Comments_NTP__90_FINAL

Document Sample
Comments_NTP__90_FINAL Powered By Docstoc
					SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL             AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                             REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                        Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                      201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                     Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                       REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                 Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                          Current
  Item                         Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                   Action             Comment Resolution                             Initials
                 Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                           Status
                                                                                                                              DESIGN BUILDER - BOOK 1
                                          Summary Work Plan, Project Management Work Plan, Outreach Plan, Construction Package Implementation Work Plan & Construction Packaging Analysis, and Schedule
                                                        Revise the organization of the 3 book
   1.             TDP            HH          General    set such that two book 1 do not exist.      JV            A       JV to revise.                          X                                                                                       Closed        HH
                                                        This has been confusing the readers.
                                                                                                                                                          Numbered section tabs have been
                                                                Add section number to the beginning of                                                    added at the beginning of each
                                                                each section of the Design Builders                                                       section. Due to the different
   2.             TDP            HH             General                                                                     JV                A                                                      X                                                   Closed        HH
                                                                Book 1. Add section number to the                                                         formatting (i.e. Word, PDF, etc.) we
                                                                footer of each page and add X page of                                                     were not able to put page numbers
                                                                ? in lieu of just page number.                                                            at the bottom of each page.
                                                                                                                                  Summary Work Plan Layout 1
                                                                Does not relate to Program WBS.
   3.             TDP            MB             General         Recommend organization at least at                          JV                C           Relates to level 6 of WBS                  A      Schedule follows Pay App requirements        Closed        MB
                                                                Level II of the WBS.
                                                                                                                                 Project Management Work Plan
                                                                WBS, Phasing codes and activity codes                                                     Nick Alizadeh is working with Art
                                              Project           are in the process of revisions to obtain                                                 Rocha of the TDP AA to implement
   4.             TDP            ALR        Management          common codes with contract 2 in order                       JV                A*          the WBS and Activity Codes                 A                                                   Closed       ALR
                                             Work Plan          to allow one BIM report for both                                                          received from the AA. This is still in
                                                                contracts.                                                                                progress.
                                                                The following additional Work Plan
                                                                sections are recommended:                                                                 Recommendation acknowledged but
    5.            TDP            MB             General                                                                     JV                B                                                      B      See Contractor Response                      Closed        MB
                                                                1. A Risk Management Plan                                                                 may be handled elsewhere
                                                                2. A TDP/Owner list of dependencies
                                                                Submit the referenced Design Builder‟s                                                    This is an internal document for the              Since the procedure is listed in your
    6.            TDP            HH              1/ 2.2                                                                     JV                C                                                      B                                                    Open         HH
                                                                Procedures. In this section.                                                              JV, not a contract document                       validation report we have to review it.
                                                                Will design builder‟s procedure apply for
                                               1/ 2.2.A.1       meetings? Who will prepare meeting
                                                                minutes and how? These same
    7.            TDP            HH             Design                                                                      JV                A           JV procedures clarified in revision.       A                                                   Closed        HH
                                                                comments apply for each phase i.e
                                               Meetings         Design Development, Construction
                                                                Documents, Construction etc..
                                                                How will the established Design
                                                                                                                                                          At incremental design reviews and
    8.            TDP            MB            1/2.2A.1         Parameters be maintained in the                             JV                A                                                      A      See Contractor Response                      Closed        MB
                                                                                                                                                          corresponding estimate updates
                                                                “Design to Budget” approach?




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
        1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
        2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                       PAGE 1 OF 50
        3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                           REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                        Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action            Comment Resolution                             Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                         Status
                                                             Should       the    contractor  forward
                                                             deliverables directly to the airport
                                                                                                                                                       No deliverables are sent directly to
    9.         TDP            MB            1/2.2A.1         stakeholder?        To this effect, a                       JV                C                                                     A      See Contractor Response                     Closed        MB
                                                                                                                                                       the Stakeholders
                                                             Communications Plan would be helpful
                                                             for all preconstruction work?
                                                             Replace “Design to Budget” with                                                           This is understood and is an industry
    10.     TDP               MIH        1/2.2, A.1.                                                                     JV                C                                                     B                                                  Closed       MIH
                                                             “Design to or under Budget”                                                               standard phrase.
                                                             How often will the schedule be
                                                             updated? What appropriate actions will                                                    Monthly. A recovery plan will be
    11.        TDP            MB           2/Schedule                                                                    JV                A                                                     A      See Contractor Response                     Closed        MB
                                                             be taken in case the activities fall                                                      implemented if necessary.
                                                             behind schedule? Recovery plan etc…
                                                             To remove potential conflicts/confusion
                                                             in the future – the Maximum Project
                                                             Budget should be defined clearly. For
                                                             example, is the Maximum Project                                                           Agreed. JV requests Owner to                     JV to ensure consistency in the use of
    12.        TDP            MB           2/Estimate                                                                    JV                B                                                     B                                                  Closed        MB
                                                             Budget the same as the Maximum                                                            define.                                          Project v/s Program.
                                                             Program Budget? The initial revision to
                                                             the estimate should be clearly titled for
                                                             similar reasons.
                                                             During negotiations the discussion was
                                                             to prepare trended estimate. It is not                                                    At 30%, 60%, and 90% design, and
    13.        TDP            HH           2/Estimate        clear how often the estimate will be                        JV                A           during construction updated               A                                                  Closed        HH
                                                             updated     and     how       will it    be                                               monthly.
                                                             reviewed/submitted/approved.
                                                             Please provide clear description for
                                                             what the intent of the first sentence is                                                  A typo. See item 13.
                                         2/4                 “The estimate will continuously be                                                                                                  A
    14.     TDP               MIH                            refined throughout then insert each                         JV                A                                                                                                        Closed       MIH
                                         Estimate            stage of the design process.” It is                                                       Please note change in final
                                                             unclear what is meant by “then insert                                                     submission.
                                                             each”
                                                             Add the following sentence to the end of
                                                             the paragraph “Design Builder shall
                                         2/5                 acquire Airport Authority acceptance of                                                   We will comply with the intent of the
    15.     TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     A                                                  Closed       MIH
                                         CR/VE               Schematic Design deliverable prior to                                                     contract documents.
                                                             commencing with Design Development
                                                             stage of design.”
                                                             This paragraph is a general statement
                                                             of the scope of work. Design Builder                                                      Correct. No changes to documents
    16.     TDP               MIH        2/B.1-3rd                                                                       JV                B                                                     A                                                  Closed       MIH
                                                             shall be held to the specific description                                                 required.
                                                             as defined in the contract documents.


  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                     PAGE 2 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                        REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                  Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                         Current
  Item                          Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                        Response                 Action             Comment Resolution                             Initials
                  Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                          Status
                                                                 How often/when will the Constructability
    17.            TDP            MB            2/CR/VR                                                                      JV                A           See item 13.                              A                                                   Closed        MB
                                                                 Reviews be conducted?
                                                                 Cost accounting and budget control:
                                                                                                                                                           They are both change orders to the
                                                                 There should be some differentiation
    18.            GPA           GWP            Sec 2.6K                                                                     JV                C           JV. Some changes could include            A                                                   Closed      GWP
                                                                 between design change orders and
                                                                                                                                                           design and construction costs.
                                                                 construction change orders.
                                                                                                                                                           Change “(Through the use of a cost
                                                                 Change “(Through the use of a cost
                                             3/B.1-3rd                                                                                                     loaded 4D Schedule.)” to “(Through
    19.         TDP               MIH                            loaded 4D Schedule.)” to “(Through the                      JV                B                                                     A                                                   Closed       MIH
                                             bullet                                                                                                        the use of a cost loaded schedule
                                                                 use of a time and cost loaded model)”.
                                                                                                                                                           linked to the model)”.
                                                                                                                                                           OK, Typo carried over from the
                                             3/B.1-6th           Change “As a data reach legacy…” to
    20.         TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                A           contract Exhibit A SOW page 12.           A                                                   Closed       MIH
                                             bullet              “As a data rich legacy…”
                                                                                                                                                           Intended meaning understood.
                                                                 General Note: What is the objective tool                                                  Two objective tools are being
                                                                 used by the Design Builder and Design                                                     utilized. HNTB and their designers
    21.         TDP               MIH        3/Procedures        Team to assure the prescribed level of                      JV                B           are using checklist‟s and the JV is       B      Have not been shown these items               Open
                                                                 completeness? Is there a checklist or                                                     performing a similar function through
                                                                 other tool available?                                                                     the use of the design QA/QC plan.
                                                                 Change the last sentence from
                                                                 “Appropriate action will be taken should
                                             3/Procedures        activities fall behind schedule.” To                                                      We will comply with the intent of the
    22.         TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     A                                                   Closed       MIH
                                             -3.                 “appropriate action will be taken, to                                                     contract documents.
                                                                 maximize the recapture of lost time,
                                                                 should activities fall behind schedule.”
                                                                 Add the following “Time lost due to
                                                                 negligence of the Design / Builder or it‟s
                                             3/Procedures        assigns shall be the sole responsibility                                                  We will comply with the intent of the
    23.         TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     A                                                   Closed       MIH
                                             -3.                 of the Design Builder and efforts to                                                      contract documents.
                                                                 recapture the time lost will be born by
                                                                 the design Builder.”
                                                   4/
   24.             TDP            MB         Constructabil                                                                   JV                A           Duplicate of item 17 comment.             A                                                   Closed        MB
                                              ity Reviews        How often?
                                                                 Please provide reference as to the
                                                                                                                                                           The Purchasing Packages and Bid
    25.         TDP               MIH        4/6.                location of the described “Purchasing                       JV                A                                                     B                                                   Closed       MIH
                                                                                                                                                           Packages are synonymous.
                                                                 Package”
                                                                 Add the following sentence to the end of
                                                                 the paragraph “Design Builder shall
                                                                 acquire Airport Authority acceptance of                                                   We will comply with the intent of the
    26.         TDP               MIH        4./7                                                                            JV                B                                                     B      The intent is not entirely clear             Closed       MIH
                                                                 Design Development deliverable prior to                                                   contract documents.
                                                                 commencing with Construction
                                                                 Documents stage of design.”
  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                      PAGE 3 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                            Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action             Comment Resolution                                Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                             Status
                                                             Add the following sentence to the end of
                                         4/C.1.-2nd          the paragraph “Design Builder shall                                                       We will comply with the intent of the
    27.     TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     B      The intent is not entirely clear                Closed       MIH
                                         Bullet              acquire Airport Authority acceptance of                                                   contract documents.
                                                             90% and 100% deliverable..”
                                                             Change the last sentence from
                                                             “Appropriate action will be taken should
                                                             activities fall behind schedule.” To
                                         4/Procedures                                                                                                  We will comply with the intent of the
    28.     TDP               MIH                            “Appropriate actions will be taken, to                      JV                B                                                     B      The intent is not entirely clear                Closed       MIH
                                         – 3.                                                                                                          contract documents.
                                                             maximize the recapture of lost time,
                                                             should the activities fall behind
                                                             schedule.
                                                             Add the following “Time lost due to
                                                             negligence of the Design / Builder or it‟s
                                         4/Procedures        assigns shall be the sole responsibility                                                  We will comply with the intent of the
    29.     TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     B      The intent is not entirely clear                Closed       MIH
                                         – 3.                of the Design Builder and efforts to                                                      contract documents.
                                                             recapture the time lost will be born by
                                                             the design Builder.”
                                                                                                                                                       This meeting to be included as
                                                                                                                                                       requested. Use the same naming as
                                         6/E.                Add “BIM Coordination Meeting” to the
    30.     TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                A           was used in the TDP-C1 Protocols          A                                                      Closed       MIH
                                         Procedures 1        list of meetings in line 5.
                                                                                                                                                       Manual: BIM Spatial Coordination
                                                                                                                                                       Meeting
                                         7/E.
                                                             Please provide reference to the                                                                                                            If the document refers to a manual that is
                                         Procedures                                                                                                    This is an internal JV document still
    31.     TDP               MIH                            mentioned “Procedures Manual” Where                         JV                C                                                     B      not available, said reference should not        Closed       MIH
                                         3, 4, 6, 7, 8,                                                                                                in draft form.
                                                             can this be located?                                                                                                                       be used
                                         and 9
                                                             2nd line, change “Appropriate action will
                                         7/F.Procedur        be taken should…” to Appropriate                                                          We will comply with the intent of the
    32.     TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     B      The intent is not entirely clear                Closed       MIH
                                         es 3.               action will be taken, to maximize                                                         contract documents.
                                                             recapture of lost time, should…”
                                           Various/          Ensure inclusion of enabling projects for
                                                             planning purposes e.g. Commissioning
    33.        TDP            MB         Deliverable/S                                                                   JV                A           As appropriate and within scope           A      See Contractor Response                         Closed        MB
                                                             of interim facilities should not be
                                             cope            overlooked.
                                                             Will the contracted O&M period, where
                                                             applicable, be factored into the timing
                                            8/F                                                                                                        1 year after final acceptance for
                                                             for re-commissioning or will the re-
                                                                                                                                                       everything. See also revised
    34.        TDP            MB         Commissioni         commissioning of all systems be                             JV                A                                                     A      See Contractor Response                         Closed        MB
                                                                                                                                                       commissioning plan submitted on
                                            ng               conducted 1 year after placing under
                                                                                                                                                       08/28/2009 for details.
                                                             service. How will integrated systems be
                                                             handled?


  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                         PAGE 4 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                        REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                    Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                    Action             Comment Resolution                      Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                     Status
                                                             The FMS solution is expected to be
                                              8/G            included in the current budget and
                                                             should be detailed in the plan as such.
    35.        TDP            MB            Facilities                                                                   JV                A                                                       A                                            Closed        MB
                                                             e.g. replace „may‟ with „will‟. Detailed
                                            Solution         coordination on the FMS is expected
                                                             through the BIM to FM Plan.
                                                             Please be sure to coordinate these
                                                             statements with the understanding
    36.     TDP               MIH        8/6.                                                                            JV                A                                                       A                                            Closed       MIH
                                                             presented in the Commissioning plan
                                                             released under separate cover.
                                                             Third line – Change “Authority
    37.     TDP               MIH        8/G.1.                                                                          JV                A                                                       A                                            Closed       MIH
                                                             approval)” to Authority acceptance)”
                                                             5th and 6th lines – Please confirm that, if
                                                             as stated, there is no budget for this
                                                             solution, a place holder has been
    38.     TDP               MIH        8/G.1.                                                                          JV                A           See new text.                               A                                            Closed       MIH
                                                             established on the trend log to assure
                                                             that this cost is not missed in future
                                                             estimates.
                                                             First sentence – change “The 3D model
                                         8/G.Procedur
    39.     TDP               MIH                            could be linked…” to “The 3D model                          JV                B           This solution is still under evaluation     B      Ongoing                               Closed       MIH
                                         es,3.
                                                             shall be linked…”
                                                             Second Sentence – change “”Key
                                         8/G.Procedur
    40.     TDP               MIH                            Personnel” could be trained…” to “”Key                      JV                A                                                       A                                            Closed       MIH
                                         es,4.
                                                             Personnel” will be trained…”
                                                             Should the Title be “Schedule” instead
    41.        TDP            HH          Page 9 / 2.3                                                                   JV                C           No                                          A                                            Closed        HH
                                                             of “Scope and Deliverable”?




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                 PAGE 5 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                        REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                            REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                     Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                     Action            Comment Resolution                       Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                      Status
                                                             WBS to be detailed as identified in
                                                             Appendix A under the following
                                                             schema:
                                                             1. Program
                                                                 1.1. Project
                                                                     1.1.1. Sub-Project
                                                                         1.1.1.1.  Phase
                                           10-19/2.3,
                                            2,5, 2.6         Activity ID Nomenclature and the CSI                                                      This is being coordinated with
    42.        TDP            MB                             codes to be integrated/appended to the                      JV                A                                                        A                                            Closed        MB
                                                                                                                                                       Airport Authority.
                                                             above.
                                                             Establishing and tracking of budgets
                                                             required at the Sub Project & Phase
                                                             level; Document Control must follow the
                                                             above structure.      The DB should
                                                             discuss details with TDP Project
                                                             Controls/Accounting for clarifications
                                                             across the document.
                                                             Add the following sentence to the end of                                                  “The model will be linked to a cost
                                                             the paragraph “The model will be cost                                                     loaded schedule to create 4D visual
                                                             and schedule loaded to be able to                           JV                            simulations of the construction
    43.     TDP               MIH        11/G.                                                                                             B                                                        A                                            Closed       MIH
                                                             create the 5D (cost and schedule                                                          schedule with the corresponding
                                                             driven) animation to be used for                                                          cost information to be used for
                                                             executive level summary reports                                                           executive level summary reports.”
                                                             This section should be covered in it‟s                                                    This section only references the
                                                             entirety by the Construction Quality                                                      QA/QC plan, and is intended as an
    44.     TDP               MIH        11/2.4                                                                          JV                C                                                        A                                            Closed       MIH
                                                             Management Plan. Should this section                                                      overview of the scope and
                                                             be removed in order to prevent errors?                                                    deliverables
                                                             Second Line – Which server is the                                                         This is an internal file for use buy the
    45.     TDP               MIH        16/2.5,A.                                                                       JV                B                                                        A      Just checking                         Closed       MIH
                                                             “S:\Filing System” located?                                                               JV only
                                                             What is the minimum standard on the
    46.        TDP            MB               17/F          turn-around time for all meeting                            JV                A           3 working days                               A      See Contractor Response               Closed        MB
                                                             minutes?
                                                             First sentence – Please define “All
                                                             parties…” Does this mean all D/B
    47.     TDP               MIH        17/G.                                                                           JV                B           All parties outside the JV                   A                                            Closed       MIH
                                                             personnel and assigns, or does this
                                                             reference the owner as well?




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                  PAGE 6 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                                        REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                        REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                           CONTRACTOR                                                             REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                  Group                                                                                                           Group                                                                                                                                   Current
  Item                          Initials      Page/ Para.                       Review Comment                                                Action                    Response                   Action                Comment Resolution                                            Initials
                  Name                                                                                                            Name                                                                                                                                    Status
                                                                 All Security Sensitive Information must                                                                                                    All Security Sensitive Information must be
                                                                 be marked as follows:                                                                                                                      marked as follows:
                                                                 “Warning: This document contains sensitive security                                                                                        “Warning: This document contains sensitive security
                                                                 information that is controlled under the provisions of 49                                                                                  information that is controlled under the provisions of 49
                                             17/G                CFR § 1520. No part of this document may be released                                                                                       CFR § 1520. No part of this document may be released
   48.          TDP            MB                                                                                            JV           A                                                          A                                                                     Closed        MB
                                                                 except as authorized by the Under Secretary of                                                                                             except as authorized by the Under Secretary of
                                                                  Transportation for Security, Washington DC 20591.                                                                                         Transportation for Security, Washington DC 20591.
                                                                  Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty action.                                                                                  Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty action.
                                                                 For U.S. government agencies, public availability to be                                                                                    For U.S. government agencies, public availability to be
                                                                  determined under 5 USC § 552.”                                                                                                            determined under 5 USC § 552.”
                                                        Referenced section M not valid, Please
   49.             TDP            MB         20/COR/TCO confirm location of the referenced                                         JV           A          Revise “M” to “K.”                        A                                                                     Closed        MB
                                                        section.
                                                                                                                                                           Will revise to “…costs associated
                                             20/Approved
    50.            TDP            MB                             Revisions may be initiated by team                                JV           B          with changes that have been               A                                                                     Closed        MB
                                             Revisions
                                                                 members other than the owner.                                                             approved by the Owner…”
                                                                 This column does not relate to the other
    51.            TDP            MB            22/Type                                                                            JV           C          This indicates the type of cost.          X                                                                     Closed        MB
                                                                 columns
                                                                 Second line – change “been incurred.”
    52.         TDP               MIH        23/G.               To “been incurred and substantiated as                            JV           A          Revise as stated.                         A                                                                     Closed       MIH
                                                                 a cost for this project.”
                                                                 Line 4 – Please provide clarification to
                                                                 the following “All direct taxes for
                                             23-24/J. first
    53.         TDP               MIH                            insurance, contributions, training..” I am                        JV           A                                                    A                                                                     Closed       MIH
                                             bullet
                                                                 not clear as to how taxes on insurance
                                                                 are related to Labor costs.
                                             24/Material         Do the material costs include all
    54.         TDP               MIH                                                                                              JV           B          No. Taxes are miscellaneous costs.        A                                                                     Closed       MIH
                                             Costs Bullet        applicable taxes?
                                                                 Last paragraph on the page, first
                                                                 sentence, change “Once a written
                                                                                                                                                           It must be a directive for a change.
                                                                 directive…” to “Once a written
    55.         TDP               MIH        24/K                                                                                  JV           C          Not all documents authorize               B                                                                     Closed       MIH
                                                                 document…” There should be
                                                                                                                                                           changes to the contract.
                                                                 consistency in terms. It is a written
                                                                 document per the contract documents.
                                                                 Add the following sentence to the end of
                                                                 the last paragraph “The D/B will assume
                                                                 all responsibilities and cost for the
    56.         TDP               MIH        24/K                written document if the “consult to                               JV           C          No                                        B                                                                     Closed       MIH
                                                                 define the scope of change” is not held
                                                                 within three (3) business days of receipt
                                                                 of written document.

  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                                        PAGE 7 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                        REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                  Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                            Current
  Item                          Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                  Action             Comment Resolution                                Initials
                  Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                             Status
                                                                 Please confirm that the previously
                                                                 released draft of the commissioning
                                                                 plan is updated with the information of
                                             32/Q – 2nd                                                                                                    This does not apply to
    57.         TDP               MIH                            this paragraph per the contract                             JV                C                                                     B                                                      Closed       MIH
                                             para                                                                                                          commissioning.
                                                                 documents. The Commissioning plan
                                                                 shall reflect the same understanding
                                                                 and time periods for warranties.
                                                                                        Construction Package Implementation Work Plan & Construction Packaging Analysis
                                                                 Please confirm that the logistics plan
                                                                 that is referred to is the modification of
    58.         TDP               MIH        1/bullet 2                                                                      JV                A           Confirmed.                                A                                                      Closed       MIH
                                                                 Section M Chapter 4 Logistical
                                                                 considerations
                                                                 The following procedures items are
                                                                 missing from this section of the Project
                                                                 Management Work Plan:
                                                                      Provide a process description on                                                                                                     Bullet No.1: Response to this bullet point
                                                                          how to distill results from the                                                                                            C
                                                                                                                                                                                                            is missing
                                                                          project validation report into
                                                                          definitive design criteria                                                                                                 A
                                                                                                                                                                                                            Agree with bullet No. 2
    59.            GPA           GWP             Sec 2.2              Collaboration meeting with                            JV                B           See item 30                                                                                       Open       GWP
                                                                          Contract 2 team                                                                                                            B
                                                                      Performance requirements                                                                                                             Bullet No. 3: See comments to DQMP
                                                                                                                                                           See 2.4 QMP
                                                                          evaluation/compliance, starting
                                                                          with schematic design                                                                                                      ?
                                                                                                                                                                                                            No response was provided for bullet 3
                                                                      Construction permitting
                                                                          procedure

                                                           Exception to “rip and read” initial bid
                                                                                                                                                           The overall procurement plan has
    60.            TDP            HH             3.2.2 (f) opening has not been approved by AA                               JV                B                                                     A                                                      Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                           not yet been agreed
                                                           and should be removed.
                                                Sec: 5     Provide justification for bid packaging
                                                                                                                                                           The final bid packaging strategy has
    61.            TDP            HH         Recommend strategy presented in this section                                    JV                B                                                     A                                                      Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                           not been determined
                                                ations     including cost/schedule benefit.
                                                           Several Figures and diagrams are
                                                Sec M      missing in this section and are either
   62.             TDP            HH         Figures/drawi out of date or need revisions to match                          HNTB                A                                                     C      Figures are still missing or not revised         Open         HH
                                                  ngs      the written descriptions. Please revise
                                                           or prepare new figures/drawings.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                         PAGE 8 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                        REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                  Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                            Current
  Item                          Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                  Action             Comment Resolution                                Initials
                  Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                             Status
                                                                 Superseded pages are not included
                                                                 similar to Design Volume 1, Addendum                                                      Please refer to accompanying site                CUP site logistic plan requires further
    63.            TDP            HH              Sec M                                                                      JV                A                                                     B                                                       Open         HH
                                                                 to Programmatic Document (i.e. M..2-1                                                     logistics plans.                                 discussion for lay down area
                                                                 and M.6.2-2)
                                                                 Phasing sequence C: Provide alternate
                                                                                                                                                                                                            Phasing Concept is still based on early
    64.            GPA           GWP          Sec M.S.3.3        sequence if the early gate concept is                       JV                A           See revised section M.S.3.3.              B                                                       Open       GWP
                                                                                                                                                                                                            gate concept
                                                                 deleted.
                                                                 Sequence B: Include design and
                                                  Sec            construction of temporary exterior wall                                                                                                    Revised M.3.3.36 does not include temp
    65.            GPA           GWP                                                                                         JV                A           See revised Section M.3.3.3.6.            C                                                       Open       GWP
                                                M.3.3.3.6        at North Concourse in the list of                                                                                                          exterior wall. Please add
                                                                 enabling projects.
                                                                 Viability of Early Gate Development:
                                                  Sec
    66.            GPA           GWP                             See GPA comments in Early Gate                              JV                A           GPA comments acknowledged.                A      Agree                                           Closed      GWP
                                                M.5.2.2.5
                                                                 Study
                                                                 Sequencing of the entire program is
                                                                 presented in the document including
                                                                 Landside. This requires collaboration
                                                                 with Contract 2 contractor. Final
                                                Sec M                                                                                                                                                       No additional revisions from previous July
                                                                 document would need to be either
    67.            TDP            HH                                                                                         JV                A           See revised Section M, Chapter 3.         C      09, 2009 version can be found.                   Open         HH
                                               Chapter 3         developed by both contractors for a
                                                                                                                                                                                                            Contractor response is not Valid
                                                                 complete document or two separate
                                                                 documents with appropriate linkages
                                                                 between contracts. Please recommend
                                                                 your strategy to finalize this document.
                                                  Sec M          Can not find Logistics Plans referenced
    68.            TDP            HH                                                                                         JV                            Same as 63.                               A                                                      Closed        HH
                                                  M.3.2          in here.
                                                                  Please confirm the discrepancy
                                                                 between the statement in this section
                                                                 “Construction will initially commence at
                                                                 the north rotunda area to facilitate Early
                                                                 Gates Opening”, and Page M.3,
                                                                 Paragraph M.3.3.2 “Early Gates are
                                                                 potentially scheduled to open 6 months                                                    If early gates are implemented, they
                                             MS-                 prior to rest of the project” and Page                                                    will be done early. However we are
   69.          TDP               MIH                                                                                        JV                B                                                     A                                                      Closed       MIH
                                             3/M.S.3.3           M.9 Pararaph M.5.2.2.5, Paragraph 3                                                       recommending that the early gates
                                                                 “JV Design Builder Note: The                                                              not be implemented.
                                                                 implementation of early gates is not
                                                                 feasible from two standpoints:”

                                                                 Will the four early gates be completed
                                                                 early or not?

  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                         PAGE 9 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                        REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                               REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                  Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                        Current
  Item                          Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                     Response                    Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
                  Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                         Status
                                                                 JV Recommendation to not implement
                                                  Sec            the Early Gates scenario should be
    70.            TDP            HH                                                                                       HNTB                A           A meeting will be scheduled.              A                                  Closed        HH
                                                M.5.2.2.5        presented in meeting forum to conclude
                                                                 the recommendation contained in here.
                                                                                                                                          Master Schedule
                                                                 Detailed Master Project Schedule was
                                                 Master          submitted separately as P6 File. This
   71.             TDP            ALR            Project         file is considered as a work in progress.                   JV                A                                                     A                                  Closed       ALR
                                                Schedule         Following are review comments to that
                                                                 submittal.
                                                                 Delete “(LEED)”. This abbreviation is to
   72.             TDP            ALR             C.3-2          be added to Page C.S-2, per comment                         JV                A                                                     A                                Closed         ALR
                                                                 1.
                                                                 Change phrase to “Use of natural
   73.             TDP            ALR         C.3-2/C.3.2                                                                    JV                A                                                     A                                Closed         ALR
                                                                 lighting”.
                                                 Master
                                                 Project         Two key plans were submitted which
   74.             TDP            ALR           Schedule                                                                     JV                A                                                     A                                  Closed       ALR
                                                                 explains the locations of the detailed
                                                 P6 File         activities.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                    PAGE 10 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                           REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                        REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
                  Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                          Current
  Item                          Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                    Action            Comment Resolution                              Initials
                  Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                           Status
                                                                 There are several areas that require
                                                                 more breakdown:

                                                                 a) Baggage Handling System – Two
                                                                    activities (area K1 & W2) shows 260                                                    Currently details are being
                                                                    days duration. These need to be                                                        developed for BHS procurement and
                                                                    given further detail.                                                                  construction schedule.
                                                                 b) CUP – Four activities have from 100
                                                                    to 175 days duration. These need to                                                    b) Detailed schedule will be
                                                                    show more breakdown and details.                                                       developed for CUP procurement and
                                                 Master          c) Mechanical Rooms – Activities have                                                     construction.
                                                 Project            from 200 to 305 days duration.
   75.             TDP            ALR           Schedule                                                                     JV                A                                                      A                                                   Closed       ALR
                                                                    These need to show more
                                                                                                                                                           c) Need more detailed drawings to
                                                 P6 File            breakdown and details.
                                                                                                                                                           schedule these activities.
                                                                 d) W-Tunnels GB & Caps has 100
                                                                    days duration. This needs to have
                                                                    more details.                                                                          d) Details will be added in the next
                                                                 e) There are no activities for demo &                                                     update.
                                                                    build out of the EDS area (Knuckle
                                                                    1-existing area) In the same area,
                                                                                                                                                           f)   Need detailed drawings.
                                                                    are electrical room 146 and
                                                                    mechanical room 147 to be
                                                                    removed?


                                                                                                   DESIGN VOLUME 1 - Addenda to Programmatic Documents
              Program Validation Process, Programmatic Documentation Review and Addenda, Programmatic Document Addenda, Superseded Programmatic Documents, Non-editable Documents with Comments, and Appendices
                                                                                                                                                           HNTB has requested to meet with
                                                                 We see the advantage of scheme B                                                          air carriers and/or Av Air Pros to get
                                                                 relative to user friendliness and                                                         feedback on this very subject. The
                                               Sec: Intro        efficiency. However the major air                                                         AA has not allowed meetings with
                                                                 carriers would typically prefer the                                                       these stakeholders. Until we get
                                               Par: 2.2.2                                                                                                                                                    We will Revisit issue during Schematic
    76.            GPA           GWP                             flexibility of providing full services for                HNTB                A           feedback we cannot incorporate             B                                                   Closed      GWP
                                              Ticket Lobby                                                                                                                                                   Design
                                                                 their first class passengers. During the                                                  airline needs without airline input.
                                               Fig: 2.2-7        schematic design HNTB should study if                                                     Further the conceived layout does
                                                                 special airline needs have to be                                                          not hinder the airlines using the
                                                                 incorporated into the ticket counter line.                                                kiosks and ticket counters for 1st
                                                                                                                                                           class pax.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                      PAGE 11 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                   REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                            REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                                Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                     Action            Comment Resolution                                   Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                                 Status
                                           Para: 2.2.4
                                             Ramp            We agree with the recommended                                                             Agreed, however it is not in the JV‟s
                                             Control         scheme (teardrop). This is conditioned                                                    construction cost. HNTB will attempt
    77.        GPA           GWP             Tower                                                                     HNTB                B                                                       A      Agree with Response                               Closed      GWP
                                                             on the db-solving structural and                                                          to make the tear drop scheme more
                                           Fig: 2.2-23       constructability challenges.                                                              simple to be more cost effective.

                                                             We are assuming that the AA wants to
                                                             preserve the capability of adding an FIS
                                                             facility in the future. Based on this                                                     HNTB was required to use the April
                                                             assumption a minimum of enabling                                                          2, 2009 as the final FIS report to
                                                             elements/infrastructure have to be                                                        follow. The previous March 2009
                                           Para: 2.2.5                                                                                                 original has no enabling elements
                                              FIS/           included in the terminal expansion
    78.        GPA           GWP                                                                                       HNTB                B           list attached. HNTB however is              A      Agree with Response                               Closed      GWP
                                                             design. The original FIS report had
                                              CBP            included a list of enabling elements.                                                     proceeding with all enabling
                                                             This list needs to be updated based on                                                    infrastructure elements for the future
                                                             the CBP validation report. See                                                            incorporation of a future FIS in the
                                                             additional comments under discussion                                                      schematic design.
                                                             on revised floor plans.
                                                             We request the following graphic
                                                             improvements of this submittal:                                                           Bullet #1 – Full size cad and pdf files            Bullet 1: We will check CAD and full size
                                           Para: 2.3                                                                                                   are provided to the Airport Authority.      B
                                                                  Increase text size to be readable                                                                                                      pdf files
    79.        GPA           GWP            Revised                                                                    HNTB                C           Bullet #2 – Provide specific example.                                                                 Open       GWP
                                                                       in 11x17 format
                                          Floor Plans                                                                                                  In our opinion the legend provides          C
                                                                  Colors: pick unique colors for                                                      clarity for the „use‟ of the spaces.               Bullet 2: Use more colors
                                                                       each element in the legend
                                                             We request additional information on                                                      Enlarged plan will be provided in the
                                                             the outbound baggage make-up                                                              future design phases. Current plan is              We will revisit this issue during Schematic
                                            Fig: 2.3-1
    80.        GPA           GWP                             (enlarged plan) including tug circulation                 HNTB                C           to route the conveyors below floor          B      Design                                             Open       GWP
                                             Level 1
                                                             and information on conveyor routing,                                                      slab of level 2 similar to the existing
                                                             e.g. below slab or in ceiling plenum.                                                     ones.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                            PAGE 12 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                   REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                              Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action            Comment Resolution                                   Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                               Status
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #1 – The TSA regional office
                                                                                                                                                       functions have been deleted from
                                                                                                                                                       the project. These shaded blue
                                                                                                                                                       areas are no longer part of the
                                                                     Provide clarification of shaded                                                  project.
                                                                      blue space between gridlines G
                                                                      & E. See drawings in GPA FIS
                                                                      study plans.                                                                     Bullet #2- This has been eliminated       A      Agree with response
                                                                                                                                                       with new apron grading and is being
                                                                     Floor elevations: F104                                                           coordinated in Schematic design
                                                                      concession space: investigate                                                    phase.                                    B      We will revisit this issue during Schematic
                                                                      floor level change south of G.L.                                                                                                  Design
                                                                      4
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #3 – Yes we are coordinating
                                                                     FIS enabling: coordinate with                                                                                                     Agree with Response
                                            Sec: 2.3                  exhibit 3.1.2 regarding gate                                                                                               A
    81.        GPA           GWP            Fig: 2.3-2                houses                                           HNTB                B           Bullet #4- Understood and is being                                                                 Closed      GWP
                                             Level 2                                                                                                   coordinated in Schematic design                  Agree with Response
                                                                     Show critical MEP & IT rooms.                                                                                              A
                                                                      IT rooms should be stacked                                                       phase.
                                                                                                                                                                                                        We will revisit this issue during Schematic
                                                                     It is noted that the revised third                                                                                         B
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #5- Noted and it has been                 Design
                                                                      floor plan will reduce the west
                                                                      concourse to a low bay space                                                     brought to the Airport Authority‟s
                                                                                                                                                       attention.                                B
                                                                     Potential office space between                                                                                                    We will revisit this issue during Schematic
                                                                      gridline, G & E assumed to be                                                                                                     Design
                                                                      standard office height. This                                                     Bullet #6 – In the Schematic Design
                                                                      space would obstruct the view                                                    phase, (2) end bays have been
                                                                      west and appear to be a                                                          eliminated resulting in deletion of
                                                                      temporary structure. Request                                                     that space, per discussions with the
                                                                      clarification of design intent.                                                  Airport Authority.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                          PAGE 13 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                   REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                        Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action             Comment Resolution                            Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                         Status
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #1 – Yes the concession core
                                                                                                                                                       and mezzanine is being reviewed
                                                                                                                                                       closely by AA TDP and Real estate
                                                                     It is our understanding that the                                                 staff and HNTB is complying to their
                                                                      3rd floor concession area is                                                     direction
                                                                      superseded by a revised                                                          Bullet #2 – These elements are
                                                                      drawing from concession study                                                    coordinated further in the Early SD
                                                                      (received GPA 7/30/09)                                                           phase based on the further input
                                            Fig: 2.3-3                                                                                                 from the Airport Authority. See
    82.        GPA           GWP                                      We concur with the                               HNTB                B                                                     A      Agree with Response                         Closed      GWP
                                             Level 3                                                                                                   submittal for Early SDs.
                                                                      improvements to the concession
                                                                      mezzanine:                                                                       Bullet #3 – These elements are
                                                                     FIS enabling vertical                                                            coordinated further in the Early SD
                                                                      transportation. Provide enabling                                                 phase based on the further input
                                                                      elements (elevator & stair                                                       from the Airport Authority. See
                                                                      shafts) for future FIS.                                                          submittal for Early SDs.
                                                                     Provide vertical transportation to
                                                                      potential 3rd floor offices.
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #1 – The AA Board has
                                                                     We believe that the roof/ceiling                                                 decided on the concession core
                                                                      design illustrated in scheme C is                                                scheme B.
                                                                      the best option. We prefer a                                                     Bullet #2 – Apron grades have been        B      No Comment
    83.        GPA           GWP           Figs: 2.3-6,               perforated metal ceiling over                    HNTB                C           modified to eliminate any change in                                                          Closed      GWP
                                                                      gypsum board for acoustical as                                                   floor elevation at the ground level       B      We will revisit this issue during SD
                                                                      well as aesthetical reasons.                                                     under the building along the west
                                                                     Show change in floor elevation                                                   concourse.
                                                                      to meet new apron.
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #1 - Apron grades have been
                                                                                                                                                       modified to eliminate any change in
                                                                                                                                                       floor elevation at the ground level
                                                                     Show change in floor elevation                                                   under the building along the west
                                                                      to meet new apron. (See GPA                                                      concourse.                                B      We will revisit this issue during SD
                                                                      drawing SK-09 section B FIS                                                      Bullet #2 – This has been
    84.        GPA           GWP            Fig: 2.3-8                report).                                         HNTB           C, C & A         superceded by design evolution, the       A      Agree with Response                         Closed      GWP
                                                                     Show how the low bay                                                             high bay now extends to the west
                                                                      concourse ceiling (Volant)                                                       concourse.
                                                                                                                                                                                                 A      Agree with Response
                                                                      merges with the high bay N/S/                                                    Bullet #3 – Agree -Moving walks
                                                                      concourse. See similar                                                           have been deleted in west
                                                                      comments on Level 2 Plan.                                                        concourse
                                                                     Delete moving walks



  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                    PAGE 14 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                           REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                   REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                          Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                     Action            Comment Resolution                             Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                           Status
                                                                                                                                                       Bullet #1 – The table B.S. 8-1 is a
                                                                                                                                                       line for line match of table B.5.2-2 in
                                                                                                                                                       the original Section B of the PD
                                                                                                                                                       comparing all the spaces.
                                                                     We need to have a clear                                                          Bullet #2 – The schematic design
                                                                      comparison between the                                                           will provide every minor space keyed
                                                                      previous areas in programmatic                                                   to the area table. The program
    85.        GPA           GWP           Sec: B.S. 8                                                                 HNTB                C
                                                                      documents and the new B.S. 8-1                                                   validation was a Program validation
                                                                      spreadsheet. The expansion                                                       of the program not a design of all
                                                                      requirement has increased from                                                   minor spaces in the plan. Not all
                                                                      317,966 S.F. to 348,002 S.F.                                                     minor spaces were shown but are
                                                                     Table B.8.2-1: Provide total                                                     certainly in the program and will be
                                                                      spaces and key spaces to floor                                                   in the schematic design.
                                                                      plan.
                                                                                                                                                       Latest schematic plans show direct
                                            Sec CS.4                                                                                                   access via stair and elevator from
    86.        GPA           GWP                                                                                       HNTB                A                                                       A                                                  Closed      GWP
                                                             Harbor police: Clarify Harbor police                                                      Harbor police office on level one to
                                                             location and circulation to ticket lobby.                                                 the ticket lobby & SSCP.
                                                             MKA recommendations regarding
                                            C.S.-15/         elimination of the longitudinal joint have
    87.        MKA           DKB                                                                                       JAMA                A                           Agree.                      A                                                  Closed       DKB
                                            C.S.10           been incorporated and the potential to
                                                             eliminate new inboard columns.
                                            C.S-10.1/        The current version is consistent with
    88.        MKA           DKB                                                                                       JAMA                A                           Agree.                      A                                                  Closed       DKB
                                            C.S-10.2         earlier MKA recommendations.
                                                                                                                                                       Those figures were annotated to be
                                            C.10-6/          Unclear why these figures are still                                                       deleted. The directions to the design
    89.        MKA           DKB             Figure          included, or why the longitudinal joint                   JAMA                B              team were to redline the report,         A                                                  Closed       DKB
                                            C.10.3-1         remains on these figures based upon                                                        which was done with the notes on
                                                             C.S.10 narrative.                                                                          the figures to delete those figures.
                                             C.10-6          Unclear why these figures are still
                                                             included, or why the longitudinal joint                                                    Those figures will be annotated for
    90.        MKA           DKB             /Figure                                                                   HNTB                B                                                       A                                                  Closed       DKB
                                                             remains on these figures based upon                                                           „DELETE THIS FIGURE”.
                                            C.10.3-3         C.S.10 narrative.
                                                             PD requirements for producing Certified
                                                             As-built drawings of existing conditions
                                              C.3-2          shall not be removed from the                                                             Cannot find this on page C.3-2 or                  Correct page No. C.S-2 para No. C.S.1
    91.        TDP            HH                                                                                       HNTB                C                                                       C                                                   Open         HH
                                                             documents unilaterally. These type of                                                     Section C3.2                                       Revise and reissue this page
                                                             items should be discussed with TDP.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                      PAGE 15 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL          AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                     Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                   201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                  Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                   REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
              Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                             Current
  Item                      Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action             Comment Resolution                                 Initials
              Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                              Status
                                                                                                                                                       Turner JV will provide only FF&E
                                                                                                                                                       items selected by AA from the 5.5
                                                                                                                                                       Responsibility Matrix – Soft Costs
                                                                                                                                                       and are included in the estimate
                                                                                                                                                       variance report. These include:
                                                                                                                                                       Holdroom seating
                                                                                                                                                       Ramp control tower furniture
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Agree with your response, however
                                                                                                                                                       IT offices/ server room furniture                respective text in the PD shall be revised
                                                             FF&E for Harbor Police, Paramedic
                                             Table                                                                                                     EDS furniture                                    and reissued to conform to your
    92.        TDP            HH                             Suite, Chapel/ Reflection Room, Media                       JV                B                                                     B                                                        Open         HH
                                            C.3.5.2-2                                                                                                  Concessions core furniture                       response. Similarly NOC is not deleted
                                                             Center,        Employee      Breakroom,
                                                                                                                                                                                                        from program and text should be revised
                                                             Concession Core Public Area, and                                                          Janitor's furnishings
                                                                                                                                                                                                        accordingly
                                                             Ramp Control Tower shall be part of                                                       West ticket lobby seating
                                                             this contract.
                                                                                                                                                       Main concourse furnishings
                                                             Revise edited notes accordingly and
                                                                                                                                                       Cruise Ship Baggage/ Staging Area
                                                             verify Cost Estimate.
                                                                                                                                                       Media/ Conference Center
                                                             Similarly, include Public seating at all
                                                             areas of the project as part of the                                                       Chapel/ Meditation Space
                                                             Contract and Cost Estimate.
                                                             Elements of the COC including the
                                          C.3-10/COC         Server Room and the Network
    93.        TDP            MB                                                                                         JV                A           Confirmed                                 A                                                       Closed        MB
                                            C.3-14           Operations Center still remains a part of
                                                             the scope
                                                             Remove       all   statements    “Airport
                                           Section C /                                                                                                 Turner JV will provide selected                  Revise statement in PD accordingly to
    94.        TDP            HH                             Authority to provide all loose FF&E                         JV                B                                                     B                                                        Open         HH
                                            C. 4-37                                                                                                    FF&E; see item 92.                               item 92
                                                             equipment.”
                                                             Sixth bullet point from the top – Tactile                                                 We will comply to CA ADA and                     This requirement was based on
                                                             warning at appropriate intervals should                   HNTB                            Federal ADA codes. If tactile                    preference by ADA community in San
    95.        TDP            HH              C.5-8                                                                                        B                                                     B                                                       Closed        HH
                                                             be    evaluated      before   unilaterally                                                warnings are required they will be               Diego. Please include an option in your
                                                             eliminating from PD.                                                                      provided.                                        finishes presentation




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
     1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
     2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                         PAGE 16 OF 50
     3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                              Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action            Comment Resolution                                   Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                               Status
                                                              Large display boards & video grade
                                                              display exclusion from TDP (E.S.7 –
                                                              three spots, E.S.8 – once, E.7.4 – one
                                                               instance):
                                                                   The addendum to PD states that
                                                                      large display & video grade
                                                                      display in decision nodes are
                                                                      “not currently included in the                                                    Please be advised that Attachment
                              HH/          Sec: ES7 &                 scope of work.” This is a                                                         “A” served as notification to the                Can not find attachment “A” revise text for
    96.         TDP                            E7                     decision made by Turner                             JV                A           Airport Authority. However, if these      C      this section to match program intent and           Open         HH
                              GWP                                                                                                                                                                        submit revised pages
                                                                      Partnership unilaterally without                                                  displays are required, the JV will
                                                                      the knowledge of the Airport                                                      make the appropriate adjustments to
                                                                      Authority. Unilaterall exclusions                                                 the estimate variance report.
                                                                      are not acceptable.
                                                                   GPA requests clarification as to
                                                                      what provisions will be made by
                                                                      the Turner partnership during
                                                                      the schematic phase to
                                                                      accommodate these displays.
                                                                                                                                                        We intend to design using the latest
              AECOM                            F.3-2
    97.                        LW                             Would you prefer to use ASHRAE 62.1                      SYSKA                B           version of T24, therefore, we will        A                                                        Closed        LW
               – TR
                                                              – 2007 instead of the 2004 version?                                                       conform to ASHRAE 62.1-2007.
                                                                                                                                                        Section F will be updated to reflect
              AECOM                        Sec: F.3.2.1                                                                                                 ICBO to ICC.
    98.                        LW                             ICBO is now the International Code                         RJA                A                                                     A                                                        Closed        LW
               – TR
                                                              Council (IC). (First Bullet)
                                                                                                                                                        The LEED v3 for New Construction
                                                                                                                                                        2009 Rating System has been
                                                                                                                                                        examined for project application.
                                                                                                                                                        After close investigation, the team
                                                                                                                                                        determined that the project would
                                                                                                                                                        benefit from remaining with the
              AECOM                            F.3-2                                                                                                    existing LEED v2.2 registration. The
    99.                        LW                                                                                        AEC                C                                                     A                                                        Closed        LW
               – TR                                                                                                                                     LEED v2.2 requirements are less
                                                                                                                                                        stringent than the LEED v3
                                                              USGBC LEED for New Construction                                                           requirements. Pursuing LEED v2.2
                                                              (LEED-NC), Version 2.2, 2005. Note:                                                       will grant the project greater
                                                              There is now LEED v3 as of 4/27/2009,                                                     flexibility in achieving LEED Silver
                                                              but perhaps this project is to stay with                                                  Certification. This item should be
                                                              V2.2. Verify and correct.                                                                 closed.
              AECOM                            H.S-2                                                                                                     “Airplane Design Group” will be
   100.        6               LW                                                                                   HNTB (LAX)              A                                                     A                                                        Closed        LW
               – TR                                           Spell out “ADG” the first time used.                                                      added for the first time use.

  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                          PAGE 17 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                          REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                     Group                                                                                                                          Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action            Comment Resolution                                 Initials
               Name                                                                                                      Name                                                                                                                           Status
                                                        From Paragraph H.S.3 on previous
                                                        page, there are 10 new RON positions,
              AECOM                          H.S-3      not 12. Revise this bullet point and
   101.        7               LW                                                                                   HNTB (LAX)              A           All references will be revised.           A                                                      Closed        LW
               – TR                                     check       subsequent      pages    for
                                                        consistency.
                                                        Is Figure H.S.8-1 duplicated on this
              AECOM                          H.S-5      sheet? Place the exhibit number on
   102.        8               LW                                                                                   HNTB (LAX)              A           Exhibit number will be added.             A                                                      Closed        LW
               – TR                                     sheet H.S-5 with the exhibit.
                                                        Figure H.3.2-1 and H.3.2-2 are not
                                                        included. These figures should be                                                               These Figures have been
              AECOM                          H.3-1                                                                                                                                                       The reference in PD should be specific to
   103.        9               HH                                                                                   HNTB (LAX)              B           superceded in 70% RON                     B                                                       Open         HH
               – TR                                     revised to indicate new Aircraft RON                                                                                                             HNTB set of RON docs
                                                        Parking positions or superseded.                                                                Documents
                                                        Several Figures i.e. H.3.3-3, H.3.3-4,
                                                        H.3.3-5, H.3.3-6 are indicating Aircraft                                                        These Figures have been
              AECOM            HH            H.3-17                                                                                                                                                      The reference in PD should be specific to
   104.        1                                                                                                    HNTB (LAX)              B           superceded in 70% RON                     B                                                       Open         HH
               – TR                                     and apron Layout that is out of date.                                                                                                            HNTB set of RON docs
                                                        Should these be superseded?                                                                     Documents
                                                        An updated performance parameters
                                                        document was provided during the
                                                        program       validation  period  which
                                                        superseded Sections J & K of the
                                                        Programmatic documents.                                                                                                                          Response unclear. Please clarify which
   105.        2               MB
                                          Sections J &
                                                        Please provide changes/updates to the                          Ross &                           We believe these documents were                  documents were the basis of R&B‟s
               TDP                              K                                                                                           C                                                     B                                                       Open         MB
                                                        performance parameter documents                               Baruzzini                         the basis of our report.                         report - Sections J & K or the
                                                        provided during the program validation                                                                                                           Performance Parameter documents.
                                                        period.
                                                        It is difficult to review three separate
                                                        documents.
                                                        Several gaps were identified in the                         JV
                                                        order of magnitude cost estimate.                                                               Estimate is continually being                    Baseline scope is identified in the
                                          Section J & K These are attached with this review                                                             revised. It is expected that                     Performance Parameter documents. A
   106.        2
               TDP             MB                       document. (See ATTACHMENT “A”)                                                      B           estimating programmatic documents         B      baseline cost estimate is expected from          Open         MB
                                           Page J3-6
                                                                                                                                                        would not produce a final estimate.              the D/B at the end of the 90 Day
                                                                                                                                                        Scope is still under development.                Validation period.

Design Volume 1 Appendices – Addenda to Programmatic Documents; PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS: Special Systems
                                                                                                                       Ross &
                                                              Add the requirement of a VOIP phone
   107.        3
               TDP           MB/CH              25/g                                                                  Baruzzini             A           Agreed. Report will be revised.           A                                                      Closed        MB
                                                              for a ticket agent position
                                                                                                                       and JV

                                                              Add the requirement of a VOIP phone                      Ross &
   108.        3
               TDP           MB/CH              25/h                                                                  Baruzzini             A           Agreed. Report will be revised.           A                                                      Closed        MB
                                                              for a gate agent position
                                                                                                                       and JV

  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                        PAGE 18 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                       REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                   Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                     Action           Comment Resolution                       Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                    Status
                                                                                                                       Ross &
                                                              Comment needs to be coordinated with                                                      Agreed. Coordination will be done
   109.        3
               TDP           MB/CH               41                                                                   Baruzzini             B                                                       A                                           Closed        MB
                                                              the stakeholder                                                                           during SD.
                                                                                                                       and JV
Design Volume 1 Appendices – Addenda to Programmatic Documents; PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS: Security Systems
             TDP                               Please     rephrase/remove      comment
                                               [AB1]. This section applies to devices &
                                                                                          Ross &
                                               device components as well as any new                    Understood. Will revise to indicate
   110.                 MB        16/2(a)                                                Baruzzini A                                                                                                                                            Clsoed        MB
                                               head end and distributed head end                       reference to existing components.
                                               components that may need to be             and JV
                                               installed under the TDP program.                                                                                                                            See Contractor Response
             TDP                               Comment [AB3]. Incorrect comment.
                                               During scope validation discussions
                                               TDP has requested pricing for
                                               requirements      as stated      in   the
                                               Performance Parameter document with
                                               the following framework:
                                                i. Basic extension of existing systems
                                                   at the airport into areas impacted by  Ross &
                                                                                                       This still requires clarification from
   111.      2          MB         28/6            the TDP.                              Baruzzini                                                                                                                                               Open         MB
                                                                                                                     the owner.
                                               ii. Enhancements as stated in the          and JV
                                                   Performance Parameter documents
                                                   for areas impacted by TDP
                                              iii. Extended enhancements across all
                                                   of T2W and specifically in case of
                                                   the PIDS, across the airport.

               TDP                                                                                                     Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   112.        2               MB               28/8          Comment [AB4] See comment 25                            Baruzzini                                                                                                                  Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                                                                                       and JV
               TDP                                            Comment [AB5] Incorrect comment.                         Ross &
                                                                                                                      Baruzzini                          This still requires clarification from
   113.        2               MB               29/9          The requirement has been requested by                                                                                                                                              Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
               TDP                                            Comment [AB6] Incorrect comment.                         Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   114.        2               MB               29/5          The requirement has been requested by                   Baruzzini                                                                                                                  Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
               TDP                                            Comment [AB7] Incorrect comment.                         Ross &
                                                                                                                      Baruzzini                          This still requires clarification from
   115.        2               MB               29/6          The requirement has been requested by                                                                                                                                              Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV


   NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                               PAGE 19 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                 REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                          Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                    Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                           Status
                TDP                                           Comment [AB8] Incorrect comment.                         Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   116.        3               MB               29/7          The requirement has been requested by                   Baruzzini                                                                                                         Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
               TDP                                            Comment [AB9] Incorrect comment.                         Ross &
                                                                                                                      Baruzzini                          This still requires clarification from
   117.        3               MB               29/8          The requirement has been requested by                                                                                                                                     Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
                TDP                                           Comment [AB10] Incorrect comment.                        Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   118.        3               MB               30/9          The requirement has been requested by                   Baruzzini                                                                                                         Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
                TDP                                           Comment [AB12] Incorrect comment.                        Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   119.        3               MB               31/5          The requirement has been requested by                   Baruzzini                                                                                                         Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
               TDP                                            Comment [AB13] Incorrect comment.                        Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   120.        3               MB              32/17          The requirement has been requested by                   Baruzzini                                                                                                         Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
                                                              Comment [AB15] Incorrect comment.                        Ross &
                                                                                                                                                         This still requires clarification from
   121.        3
               TDP             MB              35/2.3         The requirement has been requested by                   Baruzzini                                                                                                         Open         MB
                                                                                                                                                                       the owner
                                                              the stakeholders                                         and JV
                                                                                                                          DESIGN BOOK 2 - SPECIAL STUDIES
 2 - Existing Conditions Study, 3 - Fire Protection Outline, 4 - Seismic Joint Study, 5 - CBP Program Validation, 6 - Four Early Gate Study…,7 - BHS Systems Reports (CBIS Inbound Static Model, Outbound Carousel Static Model,, CBIS
 Preferred Alternatives Analysis Report), 8 - Smart Curb Alternatives Analysis Report, 9 - Secondary Piping Systems Review, 10 - Thermal Energy Storage Study, 11 - Geothermal Exchange Study, and 12 - Gray Water Recovery Study.
                                                                                                                       2- Existing Conditions Investigation Study
                                                              Existing Conditions Documented in SK-                                                     It will be revised in the future upon
                                                              1.01 thru 1.04 will be revised at the                   Tucker
                                                                                                                                                        issuance of the As-builts / record
   122.         TDP            HH             2.1.3.b                                                                 Sadler                C                                                       A                                  Closed        HH
                                                              completion of 12kV Service Upgrade                                                        drawings by the Airport Authority by
                                                              project. Please revise accordingly.                    Architects
                                                                                                                                                        the project.
                                                              Photo Index sheets (5) are very light                   Tucker                            Better prints/ pdfs will be inserted to
   123.         TDP            HH                2.2          colored text and not legible. Please                    Sadler                A                                                       A                                  Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        replace these sheets.
                                                              revise.                                                Architects

                                            Vol. 2/Ch.                                                                Tucker
              AECOM
   124.        4               LW                             Photo 23 – Why not use photo on P. 10                   Sadler                A           Photo will be replaced.                     A                                  Closed        HH
               – TR                          2/P. 33
                                                              that is in focus?                                      Architects
                                               6              Submit 3-D as-build model referenced                                                      Models to be provided to the AA
   125.         TDP            HH                                                                                         JV                A                                                       B                                   Open         HH
                                           Laser Scan         in here for our review.                                                                   once final BIM deliverables received.
                                                                                                                    3- Fire Protection Outline –New Comments


  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                      PAGE 20 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                             REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                         Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                    Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                          Status
                                                                                                                                                        Fire Protection Outline will be
                                                                                                                                                        updated to include Fire Suppression
                                                                                                                                                        Systems for Computer rooms.
                                                                                                                                                        Automatic Sprinkler System shall be
                                                                                                                                                        installed in the computer rooms in
                                                                                                                                                        accordance with NFPA 13: Standard
                                               Fire                                                                                                     for Installation of Sprinkler Systems,
                                                              No detail included on Fire Suppression                                                    2002 edition
   126.        3
               TDP             MB           Protection                                                                   RJA                A                                                      A                                  Closed        MB
                                                              system to be used for computer rooms
                                             Outline                                                                                                    NFPA 75: Standard for Protection of
                                                                                                                                                        Information Technology Equipment
                                                                                                                                                        may be used for installation of fire
                                                                                                                                                        suppression systems for computer
                                                                                                                                                        rooms if approved by the City of San
                                                                                                                                                        Diego. This NFPA standard has not
                                                                                                                                                        been listed for reference by the 2007
                                                                                                                                                        CBC.
                                                                                                                                                        As per CBC 2007 edition, section
                                                                                                                                                        1008.1.8.6 delayed egress locks
                                                              At emergency exit doors, delay egress                                                     shall not be permitted to be installed
                                                              equipment and methods shall be                                                            in Group A occupancies.
                                                              applied with audible warning devices
                                               Fire           and signage.                                                                              Delayed egress locks can be
   127.        2
               TDP             MB           Protection                                                                   RJA                B           permitted if approved by the               A                                  Closed        MB
                                             Outline                                                                                                    California State Fire Marshall.
                                                              Emergency doors shall not be
                                                              integrated with the fire alarm but shall                                                  The code requirements for delayed
                                                              include a local override.                                                                 egress shall be incorporated in the
                                                                                                                                                        Fire  Protection    Outline    when
                                                                                                                                                        approved by the California State Fire
                                                                                                                                                        Marshall.
                                                                                                              3 - Fire Protection Outline –Back Check Comments




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                     PAGE 21 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                          Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                    Action             Comment Resolution                             Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                           Status
                                                              This report is only an outline. Therefore                                                 The Fire Protection Outline (FPO)
                                                              It should not take precedence over                                                        provides design guidelines for the
                                                              subsequent more detailed analysis.                                                        project to be referenced when
                                                              This report lead us to believe that DB-                                                   making design decisions. It is not
                                                              Team will design fire protection strictly                                                 intended to provide a detailed outline
                                                              on the basis of the prescriptive method.                                                  at this PV Phase but as an
                                                              No consideration is given to designing                                                    introduction into the Schematic
                                                              fire protection on performance basis.                                                     Phase. The FPO will be updated in                  Provide pros and cons of prescriptive
             Introduct                                        Performance based fire protection                                                         detail for future phases as the          Turner/   design vs. performance design before
   128.        1              GWP                P1                                                                                         C                                                                                                        Open          GWP
                 ion                                          offers more flexibility in the design of                                                  project progresses.                      HNTB      closing the door on the performance
                                                              large public spaces together with some                                                                                                       based approach.
                                                              cost savings. When we brought up this
                                                              issue during the design work shop we                                                      The FPO is based on the
                                                              were told that the San Diego Building                                                     prescriptive design method and not
                                                              Department does not accept                                                                a performance based design.
                                                              performance based fire protection. We                                                     However, the San Diego Building
                                                              are requesting confirmation of this                                                       Department (SDBD) will accept
                                                              assumption by the DB Team.                                                                modifications and alternate requests.
                                                                                                                                                        P1 of the FPO states that the FPO
                                                                                                                                                        was based on review of the
                                                                                                                                                        Technical Reports AMP2
                                                                                                                                                        Programmatic Documents dated
                                                              Please state which drawings have been                                                     December 12, 2006 and FIS Study
                                                              used for this report. More specifically,                                                  dated April 2, 2009.
              Project
                              GWP                P1           is the project description based on the
   129.       2
             Descripti                                                                                                                      C           In the Schematic Design phase, the                                                             Closed      GWP
                                                              final concept drawings exclusive of the
                on                                                                                                                                      total floor area will be calculated
                                                              FIS?
                                                              Verify the total floor area.                                                              upon finalization of the floor plans
                                                                                                                                                        which will be prepared based on the
                                                                                                                                                        final program. For code purposes
                                                                                                                                                        allowable area is „unlimited‟ for Type
                                                                                                                                                        I-A construction.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                      PAGE 22 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                            REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                           Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                   Action             Comment Resolution                              Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                            Status
                                                              The classification of terminal space as
                                                                                                                                                        The FPO provides design guidelines
                                                              an atrium would have a significant
                                                                                                                                                        for the project to be referenced and
                                                              design and cost impact, due to the need
                                                                                                                                                        taken into consideration when
                                                              for smoke control and special fire
                                                                                                                                                        making design decisions. The FPO
                                                              separation and exiting requirements.
                                                                                                                                                        defines a mezzanine and the design
                                                              This report does not provide conclusive
                                                                                                                                                        parameters required. As the project
                                                 P1           information if the terminal expansion will
                                                                                                                                                        progresses the decision to design
                               GP                             be classified as a 2 or 3 story atrium. It
   130.        GWP
               3                            Atrium and                                                                                      C           the third level as a mezzanine or a        A                                                    Closed      GWP
                                                              assumes that the 3rd floor will be
                                            Mezzanine                                                                                                   story will be incorporated into the
                                                              classified as a mezzanine and not a
                                                                                                                                                        FPO. Per our project meeting with
                                                              separate floor. Because the existing
                                                                                                                                                        the SDBD on May 29, 2009 they
                                                              terminal T2 West has interconnecting
                                                                                                                                                        have agreed to accept the concept
                                                              floors at the South Rotunda, the
                                                                                                                                                        of the mezzanine provided the
                                                              classification of the third level as a bona
                                                                                                                                                        design layout meets the Code
                                                              fide floor would in our opinion trigger
                                                                                                                                                        definition of a mezzanine.
                                                              the need for smoke control.
                                                 P2                                                                                                     The listed code references are the
                               GP                             We take no exception to the applicable
   131.        GWP
               4                                                                                                                            C           applicable codes to the project as         A                                                    Closed      GWP
                                                 1            code sections listed in this report .
                                                                                                                                                        accepted by SDBD.
                                                P4
                                                              Please add occupancy definitions for                                                      The Concourse occupancy has been
   132.        5
               GWP             GP            1.Occup.                                                                                       A                                                                                                           Closed      GWP
                                                              the concourse and the concession core.                                                    added to the revised FPO.
                                             Classific.
                                                P4            Please add a paragraph concerning                                                         The FPO is a guideline applicable to
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Please explain how the entire terminal
                                             4. Fire –        applicable fire separation requirements                                                   the project and RJA recommends           Turner/
   133.        6
               GWP             GP                                                                                                           C                                                              addition can be designed as a non-                       GWP
                                            Resistance        between mixed uses per section 508                                                        the new addition to be designed as a     HNTB      separated mixed use facility.
                                            Requirem.         and table 508.3.3.                                                                        non-separated mixed use facility.
                                               P4
                                            4. Fire –
   134.        7
               GWP             GP          Resistance         See item 3 above.                                                                         See response #3                                                                                 Closed      GWP
                                           Requirem,
                                           5.6 Atriums
                                                                                                                                                        The listed requirements are typical
                                              P14                                                                                                       for the project location. The specific
                                            11. Fire –        Please define how this section of the
                                                                                                                                                        design requirements will be
                               GP          Department         code will apply to the terminal fire
   135.        GWP
               8                                                                                                                            B           addressed in Schematic Design              A                                                    Closed      GWP
                                                              fighting. Be site specific regarding fire
                                             Access,                                                                                                    phase in coordination with the
                                                              truck access and fire hydrants.
                                                                                                                                                        Airside package and Contract 2
                                                                                                                                                        team.
                                                                                                                            4 - Comments to Seismic Study


  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                       PAGE 23 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                             REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                         Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                    Action             Comment Resolution                            Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                          Status
                                          Vol. 2 of 2         Recommendations relative to the earlier
                                          Seismic Joint       seismic design criteria document
   136.         MKA           DKB         Study               comments dated June 26, 2009 have                         HNTB                A                This item should be closed.           A                                                  Closed       DKB
                                                              been incorporated as they relate to
                                                              location(s) for seismic jointing.
                                                                                                                               5 – CBP Program Validation
                                                              GPA submitted design review
                                                              comments on 5/26 on HNTB‟s FIS/CBP
                                                              facility concept layout. The refined
                                                              concepts presented in the validation
                                                              report incorporate our comments and
                                                              we take no exceptions. Because the AA
                                                              decided not to go forward with the
                                                                                                                                                        Agreed and we are doing exactly as
                                            Sec. CBP          implementation of the FIS/CBP facility,
   137.        GPA
               1              GWP                                                                                       HNTB                A               the reviewer has outlined in           B      We will revisit this issue during SD        Closed      GWP
                                             Valid.           the challenge to the Design-Building
                                                                                                                                                                 schematic design.
                                                              Team will be to identify during
                                                              schematic design the essential
                                                              elements for a future FIS/CBP that must
                                                              be built under the Terminal Expansion
                                                              Project for example elevator, escalator
                                                              and stair shafts and any critical utility
                                                              shafts)
                                                                                             6 - Four (4) Early Gates Study of Building Systems Back Check Comments
                                                              Include proposed schedule of work to
                                                                                                                                                        This schedule of work analysis is
                                                              be performed including durations so
                                                                                                                                                        currently under review. Once
   138.        1
               TDP             HH             General         that AA can evaluate impact to the                          JV                A                                                                                                         Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        completed, it will be provided to the
                                                              Operations. Example being Modification
                                                                                                                                                        Airport Authority.
                                                              to existing Security Check Point.
                                                              Include Executive summary similar to
                                                              other     reports    submitted    earlier.                                                Executive Summary has been
   139.        1
               TDP             HH             General                                                                   HNTB                A                                                      A                                                  Closed        HH
                                                              Executive summary shall include your                                                      included in the Final version.
                                                              recommendations.
                                                                                                                                                        A cost benefit analysis is not
                                                                                                                                                        available at this time. However, the
                                                                                                                                                        additional cost associated with
                                                                                                                                                        providing a “stand alone” structure to
   140.        2
               TDP             HH             General                                                                     JV                B           support the baggage screening              A                                                  Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        equipment is forthcoming and is
                                                              Provide Cost Benefit analysis for                                                         expected to exceed the current
                                                              Airport‟s consideration and decision                                                      budget to implement the Four Early
                                                              making as part of this report.                                                            Gates option.

  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                     PAGE 24 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                               REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                        Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                         Status
                                                              Concurring with HH comments above
                                                              an Executive Summary should be                            HNTB
   141.        1
               GPA            GWP             General         provided that summarizes the findings                                         A           Agreed. Report will be revised.           A                                  Closed      GWP
                                                              of each section and offers a
                                                              consolidated recommendation.
                                                              We see no major building interface
                                                              issues. This assumes that the
                                          Architectural:
                                                              expansion can be structurally
   142.        1                             Existing
                                                              connected to the existing structure
               GPA            GWP            Building                                                                   HNTB                A           Agreed. No revision is necessary.         A                                  Closed      GWP
                                                              without expansion joints. At level 1
                                           interf. 3.1 &
                                                              access must be preserved to the west
                                                3.2
                                                              wall of the existing ops and mechanical
                                                              space.
                                                                                                                                                        As the requirements for the possible
                                                                                                                                                        concessions have not been
                                                 3.3          The possible required concession area                                                     determined as of yet, the required
                                                                                                                     SYSKA &
   143.       AECOM
               1               PW                5.3          is listed in the architectural section.                                       C           MEP services will be determined           A                                  Closed        HH
                                                                                                                      HNTB
                                                &5.5          Please provide the HVAC and plumbing                                                      during the design phase and
                                                              system to support the utility needs in                                                    installed per the program
                                                              the concession area.                                                                      requirements.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                    PAGE 25 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                     REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                               REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                        Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                  Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                         Status
                                                              HNTB‟s concept for adding 2 lanes to
                                                              the SSCP and a new exit lane appear to
                                                              be feasible. Here are some of our
                                                              concerns:
                                                                  1. The report assumes that the
                                                                        additional queue space can be
                                                                        accommodated on the new ped
                                                                        bridge. It also assumes that the
                                                                        smart curb and ped bridge are
                                                                        finished in time for the early                                                  We agree with these comments. The
                                                                        gates. This requires. Contract                                                  pedestrian bridge and smart cub
                                                3.7                     team needs to confirm this                      HNTB                            completion is required and
   144.        1
               GPA            GWP              SSCP                     assumption                                                          A                                                     A                                  Closed      GWP
                                                                                                                                                        understood to be viable. Please
                                                                  2. The temporary exit lane would                                                      provide construction schedule. No
                                                                        impact on ticket queuing.                                                       revision is required.
                                                                  3. The loss of concession space.
                                                                  4. There may not be enough room
                                                                        to construct a temporary wall
                                                                        around the temporary SSCP
                                                                        lanes.
                                                              We anticipate that there will be
                                                              significant congestion in the ticket lobby
                                                              and the SSCP, which would reduce the
                                                              current level of service.
                                                              Assuming the City of San Diego buys
                                                              into the concept of connecting the
                                                              building addition to the existing
                                                              structure, we see no major structural
                                               4.0            problems for the early gates.                                                             The suggestion is incorporated into
   145.        2
               GPA            GWP         StructurCons                                                                                      A                                                     A                                  Closed      GWP
                                                              We recommend the piling work for the                      JAMA                            the report.
                                           iderations
                                                              early gates be extended by one bay
                                                              beyond building enclosure (to grid 19)
                                                              to facilitate the construction of the new
                                                              concourse
                                                              Table 3.3 Water Closets total is
                                                                                                                                                        Total is 28 fixtures. Report will be
   146.       AECOM
               1               ISD                5           incorrect or add where other 10 WCs                       HNTB                A                                                     A                                  Closed       ISD
                                                                                                                                                        corrected.
                                                              are needed.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                    PAGE 26 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                 REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                          Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                    Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                           Status
                                                              Address proposed Mechanical Room                                                          It is anticipated that this new
                                                              shown on the validation plans at the 3rd                                                  mechanical room will be under
                                                              floor level at column center line 22 as                                                   construction at the time when the
                                                              part of the discussion. Why this room is                                                  “Early Gates” are ready for use and
                                                              not considered and equipment is                                                           will not be completed in time for
                                                              proposed to be installed in the roof top                                                  equipment installation. Considering
                                                              penthouse.                                                                                the fact that this equipment is to be
                                                                                                                                                        temporary, it is our contention that it
                                                                                                                                                        would be a more suitable course of
   147.        3
               TDP             HH                5.4                                                                   SYSKA                B                                                       A                                  Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        action to install the equipment
                                                                                                                                                        outside of the program space (i.e.
                                                                                                                                                        roof) such that removal of said
                                                                                                                                                        temporary equipment would be
                                                                                                                                                        easier to accommodate. The
                                                                                                                                                        possible temporary use of this
                                                                                                                                                        mechanical room can be further
                                                                                                                                                        examined during the design and
                                                                                                                                                        construction phases.
                                                              Include a discussion on the domestic                                                      As the requirements for the possible
                                                              water and hot water and sewer                                                             concessions have not been
                                                              requirements    for   new     proposed                                                    determined as of yet, the required
   148.        4
               TDP             HH                5.5          concessions at the north rotunda and at                  SYSKA                C           MEP services will be determined             A                                  Closed        HH
                                                              column line 22.                                                                           during the design phase and
                                                                                                                                                        installed per the program
                                                                                                                                                        requirements.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                      PAGE 27 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                 REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                          Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                     Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                           Status
                                                              The existing heating hot water supply &                                                       It appears that this is a possible
                                                              return piping to these four new gates                                                          course of action, however, we
                                                              area are 3” lines. This pair of 3” line is                                                      recommend installation of the
                                                              currently serving the AHU-1 & 2 located                                                    temporary roof mounted equipment
                                                              in the (E) North Mezzanine and Air                                                        due to the fact that connection to the
                                            Four (4)          Terminal Box of B-101 through B-113.                                                           existing hot water risers would
                                           Early Gates        The total (E) heating hot water flow rate                                                   involve shutting down the existing
                                            Study –           is approximately 75GPM. This will be                                                       system to make the connections or
                                            Building          easily to handle additional 31GPM of                                                         performing a wet tap of the risers
                                             System           the heating loads in the four new gate                                                      and running the new water lines in
              AECOM            PW                                                                                                                                                                   A
   149.        5                            Capacity          area. Please consider and investigate                    SYSKA                B                                                                                          Closed       PW
               MEPF                                                                                                                                      the existing concourse space. This
                                              Study           the possibility of providing the heating                                                      installation would be difficult as
                                               5.2            hot water from the existing HHW loop to                                                   scaffolding would have to be erected
                                                &             support the new equipment. This could                                                     to facilitate routing of the new piping
                                               5.3            eliminate the entire temporary roof                                                        over to the “Early Gates” area. We
                                                              mounted heating plant.                                                                    would recommend not disturbing the
                                                                                                                                                              existing space(s) or systems;
                                                                                                                                                          however, the feasibility of utilizing
                                                                                                                                                        these risers will be further examined
                                                                                                                                                                during the design phase.
                                                              Please provide the calculation to verify                                                  It has been confirmed by the AA that
                                            Four (4)          if all the existing hot, cold, hot water                                                    the maintenance personnel do not
                                           Early Gates        return lines, gas line, compressed air                                                     use the existing compressed air for
                                            Study –           line large enough to take the additional                                                  maintenance purposes. The precise
              AECOM                         Building          sizable loads to serve the four new                                                             maintenance function and
   150.        6               PW            System                                                                    SYSKA                C                                                       A                                  Closed        HH
               MEPF                                           gates.                                                                                       requirements of the hot and cold
                                            Capacity                                                                                                         water and natural gas will be
                                              Study                                                                                                     determined during the design phase
                                               5.5                                                                                                           and installed per the program
                                                                                                                                                                     requirements.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                      PAGE 28 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                               REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                     REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                  REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                           Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                     Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                            Status
                                                              Please verify if the existing hot water                                                      There is excess capacity in the
                                                              boiler/heater, air compressor, etc are                                                    existing airport boiler plant to provide
                                                              having excess capacities to handle the                                                        heating for the “Early Gates,”
                                                              additional loads from the four new                                                          however, it is our recommendation
                                            Four (4)          gates.                                                                                     that this area be heated and cooled
                                           Early Gates                                                                                                        per the temporary systems
                                            Study –                                                                                                      described in the Early Gates Study.
                                            Building                                                                                                     Per the maintenance personnel, the
              AECOM
   151.        7               PW            System                                                                    SYSKA                B             existing chiller plant does max out        A                                  Closed        HH
               MEPF                                                                                                                                      during the summer; therefore, there
                                            Capacity
                                              Study                                                                                                          would not be excess cooling
                                                                                                                                                         capacity available from the existing
                                               5.5                                                                                                      central plant for the Early Gates. As
                                                                                                                                                        mentioned in the previous response,
                                                                                                                                                        the maintenance personnel does not
                                                                                                                                                               utilize compressed air for
                                                                                                                                                                maintenance purposes.
                                            Four (4)          The possible required concession area
                                           Early Gates        is listed in the architectural section.
                                            Study –           Please provide the HVAC and plumbing
                                                                                                                                                        As the requirements for the possible
                                            Building          system to support the utility needs in
                                                                                                                                                            concessions have not been
                                             System           the concession area.
                                                                                                                                                         determined as of yet, the required
              AECOM                         Capacity                                                                 SYSKA &
   152.        8               PW                                                                                                           C            MEP services will be determined             A                                  Closed        HH
               MEPF                           Study                                                                   HNTB
                                                                                                                                                            during the design phase and
                                               3.3                                                                                                           installed per the program
                                               5.3                                                                                                                  requirements.
                                              &5.5

                                                              Provide layout of proposed electrical                                                     The proposed electrical room layout
   153.        1
              AECOM            ISD                6           room with clearances shown.                              SYSKA                C           will be provided during the                  A                                  Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        schematic design phase.
                                                              Address the additional Passenger
                                                              Loading Bridge power requirements
                                                                                                                                                        Table 6.1 in the Early Gates report
                                                              listed in paragraph 10. Either add to                  SYSKA &
   154.       AECOM            ISD               6.1                                                                                        A           has been modified to reflect this            A                                  Closed       ISD
                                                              Table 6.1 or address where the power                    HNTB
                                                                                                                                                        electrical load.
                                                              is being fed from with appropriate load
                                                              calcs and analysis.
                                                              Address the additional Baggage
                                                              Handling equipment listed in paragraph                                                    Table 6.1 in the Early Gates report
   155.       AECOM
               1               ISD               6.1          9. Either add to Table 6.1 or address                    SYSKA                A           has been modified to reflect this            A                                  Closed       ISD
                                                              where the power is being fed from with                                                    electrical load.
                                                              appropriate load calcs and analysis.
  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                       PAGE 29 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                     REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                             REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                             Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                       Response                     Action            Comment Resolution                               Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                              Status
                                                              This study shall be based on                                                              Electrical load requirements will be
                                                              independent verification of electrical                                                    thoroughly verified during the design
                                                              load requirements                                                                         phase. In our professional opinion,
   156.        5
               TDP             HH           6.1 & 6.2.2                                                                SYSKA                A           the electrical loads detailed in the         A                                                    Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        AMP Terminal System Planning
                                                                                                                                                        Technical Report are sufficient for
                                                                                                                                                        the Early Gates Study.
                                                              Please confirm that even upon                                                             Confirmed. Switchboard panels A &
                                                              completion of 12kV Service upgrade                                                        B are located downstream of the
                                                              project switchboard panels A & B will                                                     12kV distribution. The service
   157.        6
               TDP             HH              6.2.1          not have enough spare power capacity.                    SYSKA                B           upgrade will add electrical capacity         A                                                    Closed        HH
                                                                                                                                                        to the overall airport load but will not
                                                                                                                                                        increase the size of these two
                                                                                                                                                        switchboards.
                                                              Can this new electrical room be
                                                                                                                                                        It is possible to place the transformer
                                                              integrated into the new 12kV substation                                                                                                       Clarify in revised report whether a new
   158.       AECOM
               1               ISD             6.3.3                                                                   SYSKA                B           in the same room with the 12kV               B                                                     Open
                                                              space? If a completely separate room                                                                                                          electrical room is required or not.
                                                                                                                                                        substation.
                                                              is required, please state as such.
                                7 – BHS System Reports (CBIS Inbound Static Model, Outbound Carousel Static Model, CBIS Alternatives Analysis, Smart Curb Alternatives Analysis Report)
                                                              These report comments will be
   159.         TDP             AA            General
                                                              submitted separately.
                                                                                                      8 - Secondary Piping Systems Review Back Check Comments




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                         PAGE 30 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                              REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                 REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                          Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                     Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                           Status
                                                              The delta T of 16F (44F supply & 60F
                                                              return) and 40F (200F supply & 160F
                                                              return) are the current setting points at
                                                              the existing central utility plant.                                                             In conversation with plant
                                                                                                                                                        maintenance they confirmed that the
                                                              Under section #3, the preliminary                                                            current set point for the heating
                                                              calculation is based on the 180F supply                                                      water supply is 180F. They had
                                                              & 140F return heating hot water                                                            previously set the supply to 200 F
                                            Secondary         temperature.                                                                                and were encountering too many
              AECOM                           Piping                                                                                                    shut downs on high temperature cut
   160.        1               PW                                                                                       HNTB                B            out due to overshooting at that set        A                                  Closed       PW
               MEPF                          Systems
                                             Review1          All the existing cooling and heating coils                                                                 point.
                                                              at all Terminals were designed and                                                        Maintenance has indicated that they
                                                              operated at the current central utility                                                       are able to satisfy the heating
                                                              plant (CUP) setting points.                                                                demand in the Terminal Buildings
                                                                                                                                                        while operating with a 180 F supply
                                                              With the proposed setting point                                                                       temperature.
                                                              changes, please verify if the existing
                                                              coils in all existing Terminals will be
                                                              functioning properly.
                                                                                                                                                        Table 1 was primarily intended to
                                                                                                                                                        show the load estimates rather than
                                                                                                                                                        the pipe sizing. Pipe sizing data will
                                                                                                                                                        be removed from Table 1. The 10 F
                                                                                                                                                        delta T was in reference to the
   161.       AECOM
               2               PW                 3                                                                     HNTB                A           Tertiary system which can often             A                                  Closed       PW
                                                              This load estimates and pipe sizing are                                                   operate at a smaller Delta T that the
                                                              based on the 10F delta T for chilled                                                      secondary system.. However, since
                                                              water system which is different from the                                                  this report is limited to the secondary
                                                              previous calculation listed above on                                                      system, we will correct the Table to
                                                              comment, Please verify.                                                                   show the required 16 delta T.
                                                                                                                                                          The calculations also included an
                                                                                                                                                        analysis at the required 40 F delta T.
                                                                                                                                                        The 35 F analysis was only included
                                                                                                                                                         as a sensitivity check. Currently the
                                            Secondary                                                                                                      heating water is returning to the
              AECOM                           Piping                                                                                                    CUP at around a 150 F temperature,
   162.        1               PW                                                                                       HNTB                C                                                       A                                  Closed       PW
               MEPF                          Systems          This heating hot water pipe sizing and                                                        which indicates that the actual
                                            Review 5          pressure loss is based on the flow at                                                     operating heating Delta T is closer to
                                                              35F delta T of the heating hot water                                                           30 F Delta T rather than the
                                                              from the central plant; they are different                                                designed for 40 Delta T. Regardless,
                                                              from the setting point used in the Page                                                   the recommendations will remain the
                                                              1, 4 & 6 again. Please verify.                                                                             same
  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                      PAGE 31 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                          REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                  Group                                                                                                                              Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                     Response                    Action             Comment Resolution                                 Initials
               Name                                                                                                   Name                                                                                                                               Status
                                                                                                                    HNTB                                The pressure loss through the pipe
                                            Secondary
                                                                                                                                                          fittings are included in the 25%
                                              Piping
              AECOM                                                                                                                                     allowance factor for valves, fittings
   163.        1               PW            Systems                                                                                        C                                                     A                                                       Closed       PW
               MEPF                                                                                                                                      risers and drops as shown in the
                                           Review 4, 5,
                                                              Please verify if the pressure loss                                                             spreadsheet calculations in
                                               6, 7
                                                              through the pipe fittings are included.                                                               Appendix A-1.
                                                                                                                    HNTB                                  We used Adobe Professional to
                                                                                                                                                        mark up the lengths of each section
                                            Secondary
              AECOM                                                                                                                                     of pipe using a pdf original from the            Please screen all electrical 12KV
                                              Piping
   164.        1               PW                             Please modify the CAD files to                                                B           12KV set. Please let us know which        B      information; Change the revise the color          Open
               MEPF                          Systems
                                                              graphically better to show the                                                            section lengths are illegible and we             of all the marked up lengths of all the
                                            Review 11
                                                              secondary pipe routing and measured                                                          will improve on the legibility as             sections to a darker color. Delete all the
                                                              length in the sketch.                                                                                  requested.                          boxes including the numberings.
                                                                                                          9 - Thermal Energy Storage Study Back check comments
                                                              The new capital costs listed in the
                                                              “Table A” for base case study and all
                                                              four alternatives cases do not match
                                                              with the “Estimate of Construction Cost”
                                                                                                                                                            The initial TES Study submittal
                                             Thermal          included in the Appendix A.2.
                                                                                                                                                        included App A.2 Construction Costs
                                             Storage                                                                                                      dated 6/11/09. Refer to the latest
              AECOM
   165.        1               PW            Options          According to the “Appendix A.2”, the                      HNTB                B              TES Study dated 6/17/09, which         A                                                       Closed       PW
               MEPF                           Study           base case installation requires the                                                             included revised App A.2
                                                2             lowest initial cost of $7.46M while the                                                   construction costs dated 6/16/09 and
                                                              Alt 2 requires the $7.65 of the initial                                                    was presented on 6/19/09 to SDIA.
                                                              cost.

                                                              Please verify.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                         PAGE 32 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                             REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                                REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                         Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                    Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                          Status
                                                              The base case study includes one set
                                                              of redundant chiller, cooling tower and                                                   During the 6/19/09 TES presentation
                                                              associated pumps. However, all other                                                          a “Cooling System Comparison”
                                                              four alternative case studies do not                                                        Table hand out was provided. The
                                                              include any redundant chiller and                                                          handout compares Chiller Capacity,
                                                              associated pumps while one cooling                                                        Redundant Chiller Capacity and TES
                                                              tower is included as redundant unit.                                                      Capacity for all cases. Peak cooling
                                            Thermal                                                                                                         demand equals 5000 tons. The
                                            Storage                                                                                                       Base Case chiller capacity equals
                                                              According to the “Appendix A.3 Thermal                                                     5200 tons with 1000 tons redundant
                                            Options           Energy Storage Profile”, all four chillers,
              AECOM                          Study                                                                                                         chiller capacity. The ALT‟s have
   166.        1               PW                             including three existing 800 ton chillers                 HNTB                C              4700 tons chiller capacity, 0 tons      A                                  Closed       PW
               MEPF                          3, 4, 5          and one proposed/new 1,500 ton chiller,                                                    redundant chiller and 2000 tons x 8
                                                &             will be required to operate together in                                                    hrs TES capacity. The Full Storage
                                          Appendix A.3        order to provide the airport cooling                                                        TES, ALT 4, has 5000 tons x 8 hrs
                                                              needs with the consideration of the                                                                    TES capacity.
                                                              TES.
                                                                                                                                                        If the 1500 ton chiller went down, the
                                                                                                                                                        TES ALTs would still have 3200 tons
                                                              Please consider to add one set of the                                                       chiller capacity and 2000 tons TES
                                                              chiller and its associated/required                                                                       capacity.
                                                              pumps into all four alternative case
                                                              studies.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                     PAGE 33 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                    REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                          CONTRACTOR                                               REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                        Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                      Response                   Action   Comment Resolution                      Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                         Status
                                                              Alt 2 thru 4: Only one new secondary                                                         Add 1 ea 3000 gpm secondary
                                                              chilled water pump to be added for the                                                    pump for redundancy. Only 1 of the
                                                              added one 1,000 ton chiller. What about                                                    2 ea TES primary pumps is active
                                                              the additional GPM discharged out of                                                       and the other redundant. The TES
                                                              TES tank? Could the two 3,000 GPM (I                                                          primary pumps will be sized to
                                                              assume one of them is back up pump)                                                       supply water to the CUP mains. CW
                                                              be able to handle the overall pressure                                                      secondary pumps will be used to
                                                              drop from TES tank to CUP chilled                                                          distribute the water to the Terminal
                                                              water header, and then all the way to                                                                     buildings.
                                                              the Terminal building pump rooms?                                                         The existing Central Plant includes 3
                                            Thermal           Please verify.                                                                              each, 1600 gpm, secondary CW
                                            Storage                                                                                                      pumps which provide 3200 tons of
                                            Options                                                                                                         cooling based on temperature
              AECOM                          Study
   167.        1               PW                                                                                       HNTB                B                differential equal to 16 deg F.      A                                  Closed       PW
               MEPF                           4&                                                                                                            1800 tons of additional cooling
                                          Appendix A.1                                                                                                  capacity is needed to meet Terminal
                                            Sketch 4                                                                                                    2 West peak cooling demand. Term
                                                                                                                                                         2 West is currently being designed
                                                                                                                                                             with a 16 deg F temperature
                                                                                                                                                         differential which equals 2730 gpm
                                                                                                                                                        additional secondary pump capacity
                                                                                                                                                                         needed.
                                                                                                                                                         1 ea 3000 gpm secondary pump is
                                                                                                                                                          needed to meet the Term 2 West
                                                                                                                                                          chilled water demand. A second
                                                                                                                                                        3000 gpm pump would be added for
                                                                                                                                                                      redundancy.
                                                                                                                    HNTB                                    No parking revenue loss was
                                                                                                                                                          included in the cost estimate and
                                            Thermal                                                                                                      payback calculation for the 6/17/09
                                            Storage           In the cost estimate and payback                                                            TES Study. A second study (TES
              AECOM                         Options           calculation, did we take the                                                                 Optimization Study) proposal is
   168.        1               PW            Study                                                                                          B                                                     A                                  Closed       PW
               MEPF                                           consideration of the revenue loss from                                                    recommended to refine the TES tank
                                          Appendix A.1        the loss of parking spaces due to the                                                     location and include parking revenue
                                            Sketch 3          installation of the TES tank and                                                               among other items, i.e., fire
                                                              associated pumps outside the existing                                                     protection tank connection, TES tank
                                                              CUP yard?                                                                                           drain to sanitary.
                                                              Section 4.4 Capital Costs: Revise the HNTB
   169.       AECOM
               3               PW                 6           “Appendix A.5” on line 4 to “Appendix                                         A           Revise per comment.
                                                              A.4”.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                    PAGE 34 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL           AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                             REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                      Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                    201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                   Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                     REVIEWER TO COMPLETE                                                                                         CONTRACTOR                                                           REVIEWER TO COMPLETE
               Group                                                                                                   Group                                                                                                                              Current
  Item                       Initials      Page/ Para.                      Review Comment                                               Action                     Response                    Action             Comment Resolution                                  Initials
               Name                                                                                                    Name                                                                                                                               Status
                                                                                                                                                        Update TES Study to include costs
                                                                                                                                                        for all three tank locations, 1 – 3.
                                                                                                                                                        In the 6/17/09 TES Study, only
                                                              The Appendix A.1 Sketch 3 has                                                             Location #1 was used in the cost
                                          Appendix A.1        proposed three different possible                                                         estimate calculations and
                                            Sketch 3          locations for the TES tank installation.                                                  presentation. The TES Study is
   170.       AECOM
               5               PW                                                                                       HNTB                A                                                     A                                                        Closed        SS
                                               &              Which location is to be selected and                                                      being updated to include costs for
                                          Appendix A.2        used in the cost estimate calculations?                                                   Locations #2 & #3 and will be
                                                              It could potentially add a big cost to the                                                resubmitted. The final tank location
                                                              initial budget if a pair of ~2,500 ft                                                     will be determined in a second study             The updated estimate includes separate
                                                              underground cased piping needs to be                                                      (TES Optimization Study), which                  costs for the 3 locations identified in the
                                                              added.                                                                                    may consider additional sites.                   study.
                                                                                                                             10 – Geothermal Exchange Study
                                                              SHG have addressed our previous
                                                              comments dated June 18, 2009,
                                                              however to fully close some comments
                                                              further research would be required,
                                                              which would be beyond the scope of an
                                             General
   171.       AECOM             SP                            initial feasibility report. Given that we                 HNTB                                                                                                                               Closed        HH
                                            Comment
                                                              did not feel that the team wanted to
                                                              pursue the geothermal option beyond
                                                              the initial feasibility, we do not suggest
                                                              further action.

                                                                                                                             11 - Gray Water Study Comments
                                                              There is no mention in the study of
                                            Gray-water        whether the existing Purple pipe                                                                                                           Although it is stated that purple-pipe
                                                              reclaimed water infrastructure is                                                          There is no available Purple Pipe               graywater is not available, we believe the
              AECOM                        for Irrigation
   172.        2              GMS                             available to the airport, and if so,                      Syska                                near the airport facility.           B      site infrastructure should be designed            Closed       PW
               MEPF                            Study
                                                              whether the extension of this system                                                                                                       such that a connection can be made at a
                                                              into the airport campus is a more cost                                                                                                     future date when purple pipe water
                                                              effective gray water solution.                                                                                                             becomes available.
                                             General          No exceptions to SGH responses to
   173.       AECOM             SP
                                            Comment           AECOM comments dated June 18th
                                                              2009 other than the item above.
   174.




  NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
      1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
      2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                          PAGE 35 OF 50
      3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL             AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                            REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                        Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                      201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                     Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                                                                                                                     ATTACHMENT “A”

Comments on Cost Estimate Assumptions and Clarifications
LI #                   DB Cost Qualification                                                                              TDP Comment                                                             Contractor Response             Status
1.   San Diego TDP IT, Security & Special Systems                                                                                                                                                                       Closed

         Qualifications and Assumptions Document

2.       General                                                                                                                                                                                                        Closed

         The TDP IT, Security & Special Systems conceptual cost
         estimate is contained in an Excel spreadsheet with tabs for each
         system. Some assumptions relative to the basis of cost and
         basis of scope (quantities) are included on this spreadsheet and
         not reproduced here
3.       Unless otherwise noted, premise distribution system, consisting                     Pathway stated to be part of electrical estimate. See line Noted: “Pathways” was incorrect and was deleted from item Closed
         of      backbone        and      horizontal     cabling,     and                    item 4.                                                    3
         interconnect/distribution, workstation cabling and outlets, patch
         panels, frames and racks, connectivity to IP-based systems
         (CCTV, access control, EVIDS, Common Use, etc.) are
         addressed in the Premise Distribution Cabling sections of the
         estimate.
4.       Conduit, raceway, innerduct, boxes, and other passive                               Should be in division 27.             One of the improvements in Noted: However it was decided to carry budget for Closed
         infrastructure required for these systems is included in the                        Master Format2004                                                pathways in “Electrical” Div 26.
         Electrical Estimate.

5.       Electrical and environmental services and support (HVAC, fire Ok                                                                                                                                               Closed
         protection, etc.) are not included in this estimate.

6.       Millwork is not included in this estimate.                                          Ok                                                                                                                         Closed

7.       Building Management Systems costs are not included in this Why? Would complicate coordination of system interfaces Currently BMS budget is carried under MEP / BMS design       Closed
         estimate.                                                  towards maximizing the „Intelligent Building Design‟ & Fully not currently specified / “Under review; BIM to FM whichDB approach (pkging et al) should
                                                                    Integrated Fully Optimized concept.                          includes BMS design considerations – recommendations of support TDP‟s expectation of
                                                                                                                                 integration.                                            FIFO
8.       Unless otherwise noted, system debug and testing is assumed Should be part of vendor‟s cost of installation for each - Yes / However this is price breakdown as discussed and Closed
         to be 5% of the system cost, not including spares.                 system components? How is this different from agreed to in estimate meetings during week of May 29th.
                                                                            commissioning?                                     - Contractors debug - testing is completed in preparation
                                                                                                                              for commissioning activities.
9.       System engineering and design is included in equipment costs Ok                                                                                                                 Closed
         (labor and material), except as specifically noted and identified.

     NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
        1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
        2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                    PAGE 36 OF 50
        3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                       REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


10.       Access Control                                                                       Ensure coordination with other trades                                       Noted:                                                   Closed

                     Qualifications

                     1. Guard post facilities (gate arms, bollards, sliding
                        gates, speed humps, hydraulic wedges, etc.) and
                        physical security equipment are not included.
11.       2.         Door hardware is not included.                                            Ensure coordination with other trades                                       Noted:                                                    Closed
12.       3.         Defibrillator equipment is not included.                                  Where is the cost for the defibs?                                           Defibrillator equipment costs “Not included in estimate”. Closed; per discussion with the
                                                                                                                                                                           (Monitoring only, provided).                              A&E costs are included elsewhere

                                                                                                                                                                           Performance Parameters / SECURITY SCREENING CHECK
                                                                                                                                                                           POINT (SSCP)
                                                                                                                                                                              5) Access Control System – AED monitoring
                                                                                                                                                                                 a)Overview
13.       4.     New identity access & mgmt system is not included and Need to add new Smart Card ID Management System                                                     During Estimate review meeting on 6-8-09, AA Security Closed
          is assumed to be existing Network switches included as part of                                                                                                   Manager, Clint, advised team current system was
          network estimate                                                                                                                                                 capable of providing required functionality. (As a result,
                                                                                                                                                                           this was removed during week of 6/8/09, specific line item
                                                                                                                                                                           amount removed from estimate -$150,000)

                                                                                                                                                                            - (Update to Estimate, Smart Card ID Management
                                                                                                                                                                           System, added cost $150,000)
14.       5.     Door quantities from performance parameters doc pg 25 Ok, but needs validation from A&E                                                                   “To be verified during design phase”             Closed
15.       6.     Door pricing includes equipment on both sides (type A,                                                                                                                                                     Closed
          B, C).
16.       7.     Training includes user training only.                  True for all systems?      Why is technical training not This was discussed during estimate review meetings week Open; Please include technical
                                                                        included?                                                5-28 thru 6-8-09, specifically ACS - AA Security Manager training at this time.
                                                                                                                                 Clint also advised that technical training was not needed.
                                                                                                                                 (As a result of these discussions user training only was
                                                                                                                                 specified)
17.       8.     ACS will monitor defibrillator cabinets.               Ok, how many defibs are assumed?                         “To be verified during design phase”                       Closed
                                                                                                                                 “Assumption”: AED Monitoring will be provided for up to 10
                                                                                                                                 defibrillators.

                                                                                                                                                                           Performance Parameters / SECURITY SCREENING CHECK
                                                                                                                                                                           POINT (SSCP) 5) Access Control System – AED
                                                                                                                                                                           monitoring
18.       9.     Only primary ACS head end is being relocated to TDP Ok                                                                                                                                                             Closed
19.       10.    Four manned/unmanned vehicle/pedestrian gates are Why? There are only two                               Noted;                                                                                                     Closed
          included.
20.       Assumptions                                                Why this assumption? TDP is depending on the Turner - Open item R&B to validate with Hirsch;
                                                                     team to validate this price detail. Is the A&E not - (Hirsch estimate attached to response)
                                                                     coordinating with Hirsch?
      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.    A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.    B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                 PAGE 37 OF 50
         3.    C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                    REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                   1. Existing Hirsch ACS can achieve functionality,                           Pricing from Hirsch not attached.
                       reliability and availability referenced. Hirsch Velocity
                       system includes functionality for identity
                       management. Pricing from Hirsch (attached).
21.       2.       Interface between systems already exists (DVMS,                             This is not part of current conditions. What is the basis of - R&B Validated assumption;                                           Ok; Closed
          analytics, fire alarm, etc.)                                                         this assumption?
22.       3.       Existing Hirsch ACS is capable of handling new smart                        Why this assumption?           The Turner A&E has been - R&B validated with Hirsch;                                                Ok; Closed
          cards without upgrade.                                                               coordinating with Hirsch. Has Hirsch confirmed this?
23.       4.       Hirsch assistance in rebadging process for biometric                        Is this validated with Hirsch?                               - R&B validated with Hirsch;                                          Ok; Closed
          identification cards is included.
24.       5.       No elevator access control is included.                                     Why? The requirements document clearly identify the need                    Open item R&B to verify additional cost for elevator
                                                                                               for access control for certain elevator types.                              ACS;
25.       6.   PIN Pads will be the existing scramble pad type.                                Ok                                                                                                                                 Closed
26.       CCTV                                                                                 Needs coordination with electrical                                          OK                                                     Closed

                     Qualifications

                  1. Lighting for CCTV is not included.
27.       2.      Programming for CCTV expansion in existing facilities is                     Ok
          not included.
28.       3.      New DVMS is provided by the STEP program.                                    Is this a verified qualification or an assumption?                          Assumption / Open item, R&B to send RFI regarding
                                                                                                                                                                           STEP;
29.       4.         No parking facility coverage                                              Requirements included cameras for parking garage. Scope Not in C1 Scope:                                                           Closed
                                                                                               must be included in either C1 or C2
                                                                                                                                                                           Performance Parameters, Security System:
                                                                                                                                                                            - item 12) c) states;
                                                                                                                                                                            - Though there are some cameras at parking areas,
                                                                                                                                                                           the airport does not perform video surveillance in
                                                                                                                                                                           parking lots.
30.       5.    Network equipment is included in network estimate Ok
31.       6.    Amber alert cameras will be megapixel. Megapixel Ok
          camera costs quoted by IQ Invision.
32.       7.    Camera locations are as per table p37.            Are the #s validated with the architect(s)?                       “To be verified during design phase”                          Closed
                                                                                                                                    (Quantities based on AA Performance Parameters and on
                                                                                                                                    prior experience.)
33.       8.      Analytics on all door cameras (tailgate analytics from Ok, what type of analytics – loitering, tailgating,                    o Tailgating was identified as the only Closed
          Vidient quote).                                                piggybacking????      Do the costs include all testing,                    functionality that could not be achieved with
                                                                         calibration and deployment for acceptable fault tolerance?                 the existing software and Vidient quote
                                                                                                                                                    provides “Tailgating” functionality
                                                                                                                                                o Do cost include all testing? YES
34.       9.      PIDS & gate CCTV included in intrusion detection Ok
          estimate.
35.       10.     Pricing for tailgating analytics is from Vidient.      Ok
      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.    A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.    B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                              PAGE 38 OF 50
         3.    C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                          REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


36.       11.   Testing included for analytics per camera.    Ok
37.       12.   Camera pricing from Honeywell.                Ok
38.       13.   60 day storage for 280 cameras at 4CIF and 15 - How about mid term storage?                                                                                 - Open item R&B to respond;
          megapixel, 100% of the time at 10 fps.              - How about back up (long term storage media costs)?                                                         - Long term: See line item 42 for long term storage
39.             Assumptions                                   Analytics assumption conflicts with # 33                                                                     The Assumption is that STEP will include analytics for new Closed
                1. STEP will install new DVMS & analytics.                                                                                                                 PIDS

40.                  2. New STEP can achieve functionality, reliability and                                                                                                                                                            Closed
                        availability referenced
41.                  3. Assume sufficient lighting for BHS cameras &                           Lighting requirements to be coordinated with A&E                            Noted:                                                      Closed
                        exterior cameras.
42.                  4. Long term video storage included in DVMS tape or                       Ok                                                                                                                                      Closed
                        DVD.
43.                  5. Proximex SMPS has video analytic capability for                        Is this assumption validated by the DB? Potential significant                - Yes, it has been validated                            Closed
                        doors, except tailgating.                                              costs                                                                        - This is the explanation reference for line item 33.
44.       Breach Management                                                                    Why not? Automatic notification to gates must be included.                  - Automatic notification to gates in case of SSCP Breach Closed
                                                                                                                                                                           not indicated in requirements;
                     Qualifications                                                                                                                                        - R&B past experience indicates this is not a common
                                                                                                                                                                           practice, although is possible.
                     1. Terminal partitioning or automatic notification to
                                                                                                                                                                           Performance Parameters - Security Systems;
                        gates is not included.
                                                                                                                                                                           “SSCP Breach Reference”

                                                                                                                                                                           (Xii) Sterile area, Terminal 2 – West, Access though
                                                                                                                                                                           SSCP 6

                                                                                                                                                                           There are visual strobes in the concourse area for
                                                                                                                                                                           indicating a check point breach, which not all gate doors
                                                                                                                                                                           or counters can easily see.
45.                  2. Cost/scope is for expansion area of T2W only. Rest                     Ok                                                                                                                                      Closed
                        of facility is not included.
46.                  3. Systems used are TSA-accepted.                                                                                                                                                                               Closed
47.                  4. Perimeter intrusion detection system estimate                          Where and what is the basis of assumption?                                  (Estimate note Only), not intended to be an assumption or Ok, expectation that appropriate
                        included elsewhere.                                                                                                                                clarification                                             scope & related cost is covered in
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     overall estimate.
48.                  5. CCTV and DVMS systems estimates included                               Where and what is the basis of assumption?                                  (Estimate note Only), not intended to be an assumption or Ok, expectation that appropriate
                        elsewhere.                                                                                                                                         clarification                                             scope & related cost is covered in
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     overall estimate.
49.       Assumptions                                                                                                                                                                                                                Closed

                     1. Breach management consists of anti-backflow
                        system for exit lanes.
50.       2.         Only one exit lane is required.                                           Has this been validated with the A&E?                                                     o    “To be verified during design”            OK; Closed
                                                                                                                                                                                         o    Assumption based on the latest HNTB floor
      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.    A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.    B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                    PAGE 39 OF 50
         3.    C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                 REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                                                                                                                                                                             plans drawing.
51.       ACS-CUP                                                                                                                                                                                             Closed

                    Assumptions

               1. 8 controlled doors (type A) required, plus one
                  intelligent field panel.
52.       CCTV-CUP                                                                                                                                                                                            Closed

                    Assumptions

                    1. Three fixed and three PTZ IP cameras required.

53.       Intrusion Detection                                                                 Ok                                                                                                              Closed

                    Qualifications

                    1. MMW radar units are not included (provided by
                       STEP).

54.       2.     Software development for integration of radar, camera, It is required that the cost includes the extension of all base - STEP related assumption, “Cost would occur under Open
          GIS not included                                              functionality into the new space.                               STEP”
                                                                                                                                        - Open item, R&B to submit a STEP RFI to clarify;

55.       Assumptions                                                                         To provide full camera coverage of the new perimeter Confirmed;                                                 Closed
               1. Two poles around T2 expansion, one pole back to                             section. Right?
                   back fixed cameras, one PTZ.
56.            2. NEMA units at base of each pole.                                            Ok                                                                                                              Closed
57.            3. Extension of existing Infinity 2000 fence system.                           Ok                                                                                                              Closed
58.            4. Labor hrs assumes escorted access to AOA 8                                  Ok                                                                                                              Closed
                   hrs/day.
59.            5. No training required.                                                       Ok                                                                                                              Closed
60.            6. Thermal cameras included in pricing ( pg 30 ), one                          Ok                                                                                                              Closed
                   pole.
61.            7. NEMA units at base of each pole.                                            Ok (same as 56)                                                                                                 Closed
62.       COC-General                                                                         Ok                                                                                                              Closed

                    Qualifications

                    Assumptions


      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                         PAGE 40 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                         REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


               1. Workstation count is based on 30 stations total in the
                   COC. The performance parameter documents
                   contain several different estimates of the number of
                   people associated with the facility. 30 is a typical for
                   a facility of this size, and an average of the numbers
                   presented.
63.       COC-Monitoring & Control

                    Qualifications

                    1. Systems monitored other than those described in
                       assumptions below and on cost estimate are not
                       included.

64.       2.     Design & construction of monitored systems is not Which monitored systems? New systems to be monitored - Statement related to COC being removed from the Closed
          included.                                                are only those included in the new facilities for T2W. The estimate in JUNE.
                                                                   development of these systems is the responsibility of the - The COC systems have been added back into the
                                                                   DB.                                                        estimate.
                                                                                                                               - Confirmed: “New systems to be monitored are only those
                                                                                                                              included in the new facilities for T-2W”.
65.       Assumptions                                              Assumed these are included in the AOC. Right?              Confirmed;                                                Closed

                    1. The documents do not detail which operations
                       systems are to be monitored in the AOC. A typical
                       AOC includes monitoring of the following systems:

                             a.   Lightning detection and warning
66.                          b.   Runway lighting
67.                          c.   Runway sensors
68.                          d.   Maintenance management
69.                          e.   Master clock
70.                          f.   Terminal lighting control
71.                          g.   Power monitoring
72.                          h.   Local weather
73.                          i.   Regional weather
74.       Qualifications                                                                      This is in conflict with RFI response dated 5/27/09                          - Disagree; this does not conflict with RFI;         Ok; Closed
                                                                                              “Fire Alarm notification is required at the AOC”                             -    Fire Alarm notification in AOC is understood,
                        1. Fire alarm system dispatching                                                                                                                  “monitoring only”, which does not include dispatching
                           equipment/software is not included.                                                                                                            equipment as stated in qualifications.

75.       2.    Upgrade, expansion or replacement of the fire alarm Why not?                                                                                               - Fire alarm system not in special systems estimate        Closed
          system not included.                                                                                                                                             - “Extension of existing fire alarm system in MEP scope”

      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                 PAGE 41 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                         REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


76.       Assumptions                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Closed

                    1. UL listed workstation, software, programming, fiber
                       optic transceivers, patch cords, testing, etc

77.       2.     Plan on filling the first position with UL listed workstation                                                                                                                                                        Closed
          for each system – the other positions will be treated as
          secondary using workstation UL listed for each system.
78.       COC-Telephone                                                                       - The cost estimate does not include wireless or WI-FI - These items are shown in the special systems estimate Closed
                                                                                              phones or headsets.                                       excel file which are included under the COC Telephone
                                                                                                                                                        System estimate.
                    Qualifications
                                                                                                                                                         - The COC systems which were removed from the
                                                                                                                                                        estimate in June have now been included in the TDP-C1
                    1. Emergency notification system is not included.                                                                                   budget estimate.
                                                                                              - The cost estimate does not include the servers for call
                                                                                              detail, and call center. No audio visual included.
                                                                                                                                                         - Per the May 28th Special Systems Estimate Meeting
                                                                                                                                                        conference call with AA phone system representative, “The
                                                                                                                                                        existing PBX includes SMDR (i.e. Call Detail Recording –
                                                                                                                                                        CDR). Also VMS functionality: ACD, voice mail and IVR”.
                                                                                                                                                        The assumption is that a call detail server is not
                                                                                                                                                        required.

                                                                                                                                                                           - The Call Center application is provided under voice
                                                                                                                                                                          communications part of estimate; However, the Call Center
                                                                                                                                                                          server was not included.
                                                                                               - Does the design include redundancy?
                                                                                                                                                                           - Added to estimate, “Call Center server” cost
                                                                                                                                                                          ($12,000)
                                                                                               - Tie in with the airport ENS is needed
                                                                                                                                                                          - ENS not included in special system; However the ENS
                                                                                                                                                                          will be an extension of the existing system, MEP.

                                                                                                                                                                           - Noted
79.            2. PBX integration with PSAP communications is not                             Ok
                   included.
80.            3. Integration with radio, digital recorder, audio visual is
                   not included.
81.            4. DAR application included under COC DARS.
82.       Assumptions                                                                         Ok

                    1. Existing PBX to provide supporting equipment.

83.                 2. Existing PBX to include VMS functionality (ACD,
      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                 PAGE 42 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL              AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                  REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                         Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                       201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                      Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                  voice mail).
84.            3. Digital recording of all incoming calls with 1 yr active
                  storage retention.
85.       COC-DARS

                    Assumptions

               1. Based on 28 channel unit, expandable to 64
                  channels.
86.       COC-AV Systems

                    Assumptions

                  1. AV scope and unit pricing based on Indianapolis
                      pricing for 2008 AOC/EOC.
87.       2.      Media room scope from performance parameters. Unit
          pricing from previous experience and projects.
88.       COC-Radio Systems

                    Qualifications

                    1. Radio coverage is only for expanded T2W, not
                       existing facilities.

89.            2. Cell coverage in the COC only.
90.            3. No new trunked mobile radio systems/devices are
                  provided.
91.            4. COC will use a distributed antenna system
92.            5. Audio recording estimate under COC-DARS
93.       COC-SOC Relocation

                    Assumptions

                    1. Existing system can achieve functionality, reliability
                       and availability referenced in security PP.

94.       Common Use Systems

          Qualifications

               1. Common use equipment will be implemented in T2W
                  only (new + existing).
      NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
         1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
         2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.          PAGE 43 OF 50
         3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                   REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009



95.             2. 120 CUSS kiosks per performance parameters pg 29.                           Spreadsheet contains 126 CUSS kiosks. This is 6 too many                     - To be verified during design;      Closed
                                                                                               as the 120 includes 6 Smart Curb Cuss Kiosks.
96.             3.   30 new ticket agent positions in new T2W.                                 Verify this #                                                                - To be verified during design;      Closed
97.             4.   34 existing ticket agent positions in existing T2W.                       Verify this #                                                                - Noted;                             Closed
98.             5.   10 new gates and nine existing gates.
99.             6.   Six Smart Curb positions.                                                 - What about scales for the Smart Curb? Where is this - Smart Curb scales are included in the millwork, Closed
                                                                                               pricing?                                              which are in contract 2 scope;

                                                                                                                                                       - To be verified during design;
                                                                                               - Validate – will there be 6 CUSS kiosks PLUS 6 ticket - However, 6 kiosks and equipment for 6 counter
                                                                                               agent workstations? Or just the CUSS kiosks?           workstations are accounted for at Smart Curb as shown in
                                                                                                                                                      special systems estimate Excel file, “Common Use
                                                                                                                                                      Systems”, Column M “Qualifications”.
100.          7. Pricing based on SITA quote.
101.       Assumptions

                1. Each kiosk will have workstation, 19” LCD monitor, ATB,
                   BTP, DCP



102.            2. Each ticket agent position requires workstation, 19”                        -Assumes that workstation has ability to support RFID - CUPPS should be able to support RFID baggage              Closed
                   monitor, ATB, BTP and DCP                                                   baggage tracking?                                     tracking. (Refer to CUPPS standards)

                                                                                                - Need credit card reader                                                   - Included
                                                                                                - Need passport reader                                                      - Included
103.          3. Each gate will have a two-position gate counter +
                 boarding area podium
104.          4. Each gate counter will have 2 workstations, monitor,
                 ATB and DCP ( no BTP )
105.          5. Each boarding area podium will have workstation,
                 monitor and 2 BGR
106.          6. Millwork is included in other estimates.
107.       EVIDS

           Qualifications

                1. No individual airline flight information systems are
                   included.

108.            2. Taxi/limo staging area display is not included.                             Why not? Section III:B:3 Flight Information Display System
                                                                                               Location Requirements:                                                                                            Needs Discussion.
       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                             PAGE 44 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                       REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                                                                               Additional      FIDS-related       system      locations     include   the
                                                                                               following:                                                                                                                           Idenitfied as a requirement in the
                                                                                                                                                                            (1) Not in Contract 1 scope                             Performance Paramter document:
                                                                                               (1)      Taxi/Limo Staging Areas                                                                                                     Special Systems III:B:3 Flight
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Information     Display   System
                                                                                                                                                                            (2) Not in Contract 1 scope                             Location Requirements.
                                                                                               (2)      Cell Phone Lot
                                                                                                                                                                            (3) R&B verified (SIDS) were not included in estimate
                                                                                               (3)      TSA checkpoints (SIDS)
                                                                                                                                                                    Added cost to estimate for SIDS ($13,107)
109.            3. Cell phone lot display is not included.                                     Why not? Section III:B:3:K:               Flight Information Display See item 108 response above;                                    Needs Discussion.
                                                                                               System Location Requirements:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Idenitfied as a requirement in the
                                                                                               Additional      FIDS-related       system      locations     include   the                                                           Performance Paramter document:
                                                                                               following:                                                                                                                           Special Systems III:B:3 Flight
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Information     Display   System
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Location Requirements.
                                                                                               (1)      Taxi/Limo Staging Areas
                                                                                               (2)      Cell Phone Lot
                                                                                               (3)      TSA checkpoints (SIDS)
110.            4. Parking garage displays are not included


111.            5. Smart curb displays and pedestrian bridge displays are
                   included.

112.            6. EVIDS locations include gate counters, jet bridges,                         What about GIDS in the hold rooms? See Section III:B:3:I:                     - GIDS Displays shown in estimate – Three per gate, Ok; Closed
                   public areas for flight arrival/departure information,                                                                                                   shown in Excel file, EVIDS sheet.
                   baggage claim, pre-flight screening and ticketing
                                                                                               GIDS displays shall be installed in the hold rooms that can
                                                                                               be made available to airlines.

                                                                                               What about SIDS? See Section III:B:1: a) There are five
                                                                                               (5) types of FIDS-based systems that shall be installed in
                                                                                               the Terminal 2 West expansion. These are:
                                                                                               (1)    Baggage Information Display Systems (BIDS)
                                                                                                                                                          (1) thru (4) shown in estimate Excel file, EVIDS sheet
                                                                                               (2)    Flight Information Display Systems (FIDS)
                                                                                               (3)    Gate Information Display Systems (GIDS)
                                                                                               (4)    Ramp Information Display Systems (RIDS)
                                                                                                                                                          (5) SIDS – Duplicate (See item 108);
                                                                                               (5)    Security Information Display Systems (SIDS)

                                                                                               Also, see Section III:B:3: K

                                                                                               k)       Additional FIDS-related system locations include the

       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                 PAGE 45 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                      REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                                                                                               following:                                                                  k) Items (1 -3) duplicate see line item 108.
                                                                                               (1)     Taxi/Limo Staging Areas
                                                                                               (2)     Cell Phone Lot
                                                                                               (3)     TSA checkpoints (SIDS)
113.            7. All signage will be 46” LCD monitors
114.            8. Monitor pricing from NEC list
115.            9. Public flight information displays will have an average of
                    eight monitors each.
116.            10. Ramp information displays (pg 32) will be 6‟ x 3‟ low                      Why are RIDS LEDs and all other EVIDS LCDs?                                 LEDs are an appropriate technology for exterior Ok; Closed
                    resolution LED signs, one per gate.                                                                                                                    applications due to brightness and environmental
                                                                                                                                                                           characteristics.
117.            11. Baggage claim carousels ( 2 ) will have 2 monitors per
                    claim unit
118.            12. Four EVIDS monitors required for back of house bag                          - Where is this in the cost estimate?                                       - The Special Systems Estimate Excel file, EVIDS sheet, Closed
                    makeup operations.                                                                                                                                     Shown in column M / Row 5
                                                                                                                                                                           “Qualifications” state;
                                                                                                                                                                            88 monitors FIDS, 30 monitors Gates (three per gate), four
                                                                                                                                                                           each for BIDS and BIKS. Includes two FIDS banks at
                                                                                                                                                                           curbside, and in two at pedestrian bridge.

                                                                                                                                                                            - Noted;
                                                                                                - Also, what about the FIDS workstation for the existing
                                                                                               AOC and any future AOC locations? This needs to be
                                                                                               included.
119.          13. Two baggage information kiosks with 2 baggage
                  information monitors per kiosk.
120.          14. Two EVIDS banks on Smart Curb.
121.          15. Two EVIDS banks on pedestrian bridges.
122.          16. Taxi/limo staging area display is not included.                              See #108 comments above
123.       Assumptions                                                                         There could be up to 6 new airlines. See Section III:A:3                     - R&B verified and identified additional cost;

                1. The only new airline interfaces required are for 3                          a)      The CUPPS shall accommodate all of the existing Added cost to estimate for up to six additional airline
                   international carriers (pg 25). Other existing carrier                      airlines in T2-W as well as any new airlines (up to six (6)) interfaces ($35,000)
                   interfaces already exist.

124.       Master Clock

           None

125.       Public Address                                                                      OK.

           Qualifications

       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                              PAGE 46 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                                          REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009



                1. Public address system upgrade to digital extends only to
                   T2W. Equipment upgrades in existing facilities are not
                   included.

126.            2. No stand-alone audio systems for tenants are included.
127.            3. System is not to be used as voice evacuation. UL-listed                     Is the voice EVAC system in the fire alarm system?                                  The existing fire alarm/life safety system is to be Ok, Closed
                   paging system for voice evacuation is not included.                                                                                                              extended to cover the fire alarm system
                                                                                                                                                                                    requirements for the terminal expansion, MEP.
                                                                                                                                                                                   The existing system includes voice messaging
                                                                                                                                                                                    with manual override capabilities at the fire
                                                                                                                                                                                    alarm control panel (FACP) by authorized/fire
                                                                                                                                                                                    department personnel.
128.          4. Pricing based on IED quote (attached) for headend,
                 microphone stations, and ancillary equipment. Speakers
                 based on vendor quotation.
129.          5. Use IP microphones (pg 41).
130.       Assumptions

                1. New audio system head end announcement control
                   system required for digital upgrade (pg 39).

131.       2.    Video paging capability will be provided by the audio
           system.
132.       CATV

           None

133.       POS

           Qualifications

                1. Concessions Point of Sale head end system is not
                   included.

134.       Assumptions

                1. POS system requires one new server, workstation and
                   software.

135.       Voice Communications


       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                                                    PAGE 47 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                                 REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


           Qualifications

                1. Servers required to support Call Center, CDR and
                   messaging applications are not included.

136.          2. Emergency Notification System (ENS ) is not included.
137.          3. PBX Integration with Radio Digital Recording, Audio
                 Visual/Video, or PSAP communications is not included.
138.       Assumptions

                1. Design assumes reuse of existing PBX.

139.       2.      Airport is not and will not be public safety answering
           point (PSAP).
140.       Network

           Qualifications

                1. Separate networks are not provided. All systems,
                   including voice, data, security, CCTV, and special
                   systems are served by a single common network.

141.            2. Pricing based on Cisco Systems quotations.
142.            3. Network architecture is based on two core switches &                         - No sketch attached.                                      - R&B provided network diagram to HNTB with 5% SD   Ok, Closed
                   two distribution switches (per attached sketch).                             - The network architecture seems to be quite simple – two (5% diagram to be attached to response)
                                                                                               core and two distribution switches.
143.          4. Edge switches are based on estimated port counts.
144.          5. Seven power over Ethernet switches are provided to
                 support WAP, COC wireless 802.11 phones, and future
                 VoIP services.
145.          6. Spare port (50 percent) capacity has been provided to
                 support future growth.
146.       Assumptions                                                                         Confirm if Cisco has anything today that supports 100Gbps Open item; R&B to verify;                             Open
                                                                                               interface. If they do, it is most likely on the optical platform.
                                                                                                Does this architecture have any optical components in it?
                1. 10 gigabit/sec single line transmission, ability to support
                   40 & 100 Gbps (p 37).

147.       Premise Distribution

           Qualifications

                1. PDS only applicable to existing facility to extent of
       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                           PAGE 48 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                         REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


                     supporting CUTE. No additional infrastructure to
                     existing facility included

148.          2. Conduit & pathway are not included in this estimate, and
                 are in the Electrical Estimate.
149.          3. UPS units for network and server units are provided.
150.          4. Spare capacity has been provided to support future
                 growth, in accordance with the PD.
151.          5. UPS is provided for the main server room.
152.          6. 1800 data outlets are provided for, based on equipment
                 counts and estimate of voice and data services in office
                 space in accordance with architectural estimate for office
                 space. WAOs provided based on 80 sf space, allowing
                 for one voice, one data per space.
153.          7. Media room requires data connectivity & AV system per
                 the PD. AV costs are in AV estimate.
154.          8. Allowance made for extension of outside plant to
                 connect to existing airfield fiber ring and Smart Curb
155.          9. Backbone cabling is provided to interface one existing
                 main communications room to the new main
                 communications room. Backbone cabling consists of
                 SM and MM fiber with 300 pair copper.
156.       Assumptions

                1. Five telecommunications rooms (TRs) are required to
                   serve expanded T2W.

157.          2. Two new TRs are required (+/- 400 sf ea). Three of the
                  TRs will be existing rooms on spine of existing
                  concourse, with expansion and upgrade as required.
158.          3. Backbone cabling in existing T2W will have to be
                  increased to accommodate CUTE.
159.          4. Project assumes one new main communication room
                  and one existing, to be used to provide switch and path
                  diversity.
160.          5. One new server room is provided for, at 2000 sf.
161.          6. The COC requires one dedicated data room.
162.          7. Communication room architectural finish provided under
                  arch estimate
163.          8. Cabling infrastructure construction in existing T2W will
                  be performed at night ( premium labor time )
164.          9. All IP devices and data outlets are served by the PDS
165.       Security Technology Enhancement Project ( STEP )                                    No considerations need to be made, regarding STEP other Related to Item 54 / R&B to submit a STEP RFI to Open
                                                                                               than the details provided in the Performance Parameters clarify;
                                                                                               documents.
           The STEP is currently a separate capital program at the airport
       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.                 PAGE 49 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL               AIRPORT – TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (TDP)                                                                                                                  REVIEW COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:                          Terminal Development Program Contract – 1                                                           DOCUMENT TITLE: NTP + 90 Day Deliverables
PROJECT NUMBER:                        201301A                                                                                             DOCUMENT DATE: July 10, 2009
PROJECT MANAGER:                       Habib Husain                                                                                        COMMENTS DUE DATE: July 31, 2009


           aimed at enhancing safety, security and situational awareness
           across the entire airport campus. It has a significant influence
           on the security elements of the TDP, and many aspects of
           STEP are included in the performance parameters for the TDP
           provided by the owner.

166.       Since it is unclear at this point precisely how much of the STEP
           should be included in the TDP estimate, the costs associated
           with this campus-wide program are treated as an optional
           allowance.

167.       Assumptions

                1. The goal of STEP is to prevent and detect unauthorized
                   entry, presence,
                   and movement in the following areas:
                    Perimeter
                    Vehicle Access Gates
                    Employee Portals
                    Terminal Lobbies
                    Terminal Roadways
                    Passenger Screening Checkpoints.

168.       2.      Technologies will be combined collaboratively to provide
           situational and domain awareness.
169.       3.STEP Phases are understood to be:
                    Phase 1: CCTV for TSA checkpoint and baggage
                       screening, plus command/control and digital video
                       management systems
                    Phase 2: CCTV migration
                    Phase 3: perimeter security
                    Phase 4: employee portal screening
                    Phase 5: terminal lobbies
                    Phase 6: terminal roadways




       NOTE: RESPONSES FOR LEAD CONSULTANT ACTION
          1.   A ACTION: AGREE FULLY WITH THE COMMENT. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE NEXT VERSION. NO RESPONSE IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.
          2.   B ACTION: AGREE PARTLY WITH AS NOTED EXCEPTIONS. THE EFFECTED DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVISED IN THE VERSION. REASONS FOR PARTIAL DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.          PAGE 50 OF 50
          3.   C ACTION: DISAGREE FULLY. REASONS FOR DISAGREEMENT ARE NOTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:20
posted:10/18/2011
language:English
pages:50