Docstoc
EXCLUSIVE OFFER FOR DOCSTOC USERS
Try the all-new QuickBooks Online for FREE.  No credit card required.

Grants Policy Committee

Document Sample
Grants Policy Committee Powered By Docstoc
					Grants Policy Committee
 Stakeholders’ Webcast
     March 18, 2008

                   Tom Cooley
                   GPC Chair
                                1
                       Agenda

• Welcome and thank you to HUD
• Strategic planning and product update
• Transparency Act Grants Sub-Award Pilot
  update
• Post-Award Work Group/Performance
  Progress Report update
• Question & Answer panel
                                            2
                      Presenters

• Tom Cooley (NSF), Grants Policy Committee
 (GPC) Chair
• Andrea Brandon (USDA), Transparency Act,
 Grants Committee, Sub-Award Pilot Group Chair
• Michael Nelson (DOC), GPC, Post-Award
 Work Group Chair
• Diana King (HHS), GPC, Performance
 Progress Report Team Leader
• Elizabeth Phillips, Contractor for HHS/ACF   3
              The Grants Policy
                 Committee
• The GPC is a committee of the U.S. Chief Financial
  Officers (CFO) Council.
• The GPC is charged with improving the
  management of Federal financial assistance
  government-wide.
• The Committee recommends financial assistance
  policies and practices to OMB and coordinates
  related interagency activities.
• The GPC serves the public interest in collaboration
  with other Federal-wide grants initiatives.      4
Draft Strategic Plan
     Overview
• Vision & Mission
• Twin Strategic Goals
   – Streamlining and Stewardship
• Objectives
  – Consolidated and consistent
    OMB guidance
  – Uniform forms and formats
  – Standard business processes
  – GPC organizational performance
  – Community involvement
  – Training and certification
                                5
  – Audit and oversight
                Proposed Priorities

• Near-term (FY08)
  – Products currently in the Federal Register
    Process
• Federal Register Process




                                            6
      Near-term Priorities

• Additional near-term
  activities include:
  – Audit-related policies
    and processes
  – Stakeholder education
    and outreach


                             7
                  Proposed Priorities

• Mid-term (1-3 years) and long-term (4-5 years)
  – Consolidated and consistent OMB guidance on
    grants policy
  – Continued stakeholder education and outreach
  – Further development of audit processes
  – Development of training and certification
    standardization for Federal Grants
    Professionals
                                                8
                Mid-term Priorities

• Mid-term Products (1-3 years)
    • Subchapter C1, standard award
      content and format
    • A-133 Report
    • A-133 process review
    • Policy on use of Grants.gov for
      mandatory grants
    • Training competencies
                                        9
                    Long-term Priorities
• Long-term     Products (4-5 years)
 2 CFR
 • Subchapter A, General       • Cost Principles
   Matters                     • Announcement format
 • Subchapter B, Pre-award       phase 2, late
   Responsibilities              application policy
 • Subchapter C, Trafficking   • Training curriculum
   in Persons                  • Grants Profession
 • Subchapter C, Expedited       document
   Action on FFATA Flow        • Certificate program
   Down                        • Government-wide
 • Subchapter G, Lobbying        database tracking
   Guidance                      training
 • Subchapter G, Drug Free
   Workforce Policy                                10
   Grants Policy Committee
          Priorities



  Any Questions?

   Call: 202-708-0995
            or
Email: HUDTV@HUD.GOV
                         11
Transparency Act, Grant
Sub-Award Pilot Update
  Andrea Brandon, USDA



                          12
                Transparency Act Grant
                   Sub-Award Pilot
• Pilot currently set for June 23, 2008 through
  August 23, 2008
• Open to States, Local Governments,
  Universities, Tribes, Non-Profits, etc.
• Currently have 53 pilot participants (not counting
  duplicate representatives from the same
  organization)
• 10 Government; 18 Non-profits; 25 Colleges &
  Universities.; 0 Tribal Entities
                                                   13
                 Transparency Act Grant
                    Sub-Award Pilot
• FFATA Sub-Award Work Group will be working on
  DRAFT Regulations (will publish for 30 day comment
  period by the end of May 2008):

      a.30 day reporting requirement
      b.Additional data elements
      c.How to report to the Sub-Award database
      d.Liability for data (First Tier vs. Sub-Awardee)
      e.How many tiers down to report
      f. Format for data elements
      g.Whether to include deobligation data or not
      h.Thresholds
                                                          14
     Transparency Act Grant
        Sub-Award Pilot
• GPC Pre-Award Work Group is
  finalizing the DRAFT
  regulations on the use of the
  DUNS number and CCR.gov for
  grant Sub-Awards; and the
  Term and Condition to be used
  on all awards.
• DRAFT regulations will be sent
  to GPC and OMB
  simultaneously; to be published
  for 30 day comment period by
  the end of March 2008.

                                    15
              Transparency Act Grant
                 Sub-Award Pilot
• The OMB E-Government office will soon
  look at possible IT Solutions for the grant
  Sub-Award pilot.
• Possible identification of IT solution before
  mid April 2008.
• Once IT solution is identified; will work with
  pilot participants to finalize the instructions
  for how the pilot will take place.
                                               16
             Transparency Act Grant
                Sub-Award Pilot
• Would like more pilot participants –
  especially from the Tribal Community

• Would like to make sure that we can test
  multiple levels of Sub-Award reporting
  from the same grant in several instances
  during the pilot



                                             17
Transparency Act Grant
   Sub-Award Pilot




Any Questions?




                         18
Post Award Work Group
      & SF-PPR
   Michael Nelson, DOC
 Post-Award Work Group Chair


       Diana King, HHS
   Performance Progress Report
         Team Leader
          (by phone)
                                 19
            Post-Award Work Group
               Current Activities
• Payments
   –Request GPC approval of standard
    back office and user data elements
• Invention Report
  – Request GPC approval of Federal
    Register Notice (FRN) finalizing data
    elements

                                            20
            Grantee Performance
           and Progress Reporting
• Background:
 – P.L.106-107 required streamlining forms
 – Initial analysis revealed 800+
   performance reporting forms
 – Post Award Work Group developed a
   standard SF-PPR from 2004 – 2006
 – GPC approved the SF-PPR in Spring
   2006
                                         21
                Grantee Performance
               and Progress Reporting
• OMB approved use of SF-PPR
 – Grants Center of Excellence (COE) sponsor
 – Published for initial comment April 5, 2007
   [72 FR16796]
 – Published for final comment July 24, 2007
   [72 FR 40307]
 – Received OMB approval on November 30, 2007
 – COE electronic proof-of-concept has begun
 – Use of SF-PPR is “encouraged” by OMB, however no
   policy issuance as yet

                                                  22
Performance Progress
       Report




                       23
             Grantee Performance
            and Progress Reporting
• SF-PPR Formats
 – Cover page + supplemental information
 – SF-PPR-A, Performance Measures
 – SF-PPR-B, Program Indicators
 – SF-PPR-C, Benchmark Evaluations
 – SF-PPR-D, Table of Activity Results
 – SF-PPR-E, Activity-Based Expenditures
 – SF-PPR-F, Program/Project Management

                                           24
SF-PPR Technical Implementation
             Elizabeth Phillips
 Synectics for Management Decisions, Inc.

 Under contract with the Grants Center of
  Excellence (COE), managed by HHS
 Administration for Children and Families
                  (ACF)
                                            25
                  SF-PPR Technical
                   Implementation
• Example use of SF-PPR for Protection
  and Advocacy (P&A)
  – P&A pilot since Fall 2003
  – 8 P&A programs across 5 agencies within 3
    Federal Departments (HHS, Ed., SSA)
  – 8 unique forms to be completed by the same
    P&A grantee
  – Collaboration has resulted in agreement on a
    single data collection
  – P&A team agrees to use SF-PPR formats
                                               26
                SF-PPR Technical
                 Implementation
• Other examples of SF-PPR use
  – ACF’s Abstinence Education program
  – Administration on Native Americans
  – NSF promoting use of SF-RPPR, standard
    form for Research Performance Progress
    Report
  – Education evaluating use of SF-PPR to
    replace ED-524 currently in use


                                             27
                 SF-PPR Technical
                  Implementation
• In the future:
  – Center of Excellence (COE) will
    complete electronic prototypes
    • Protection & Advocacy reporting
    • Abstinence Education reporting

  – COE partners may opt to use SF-PPR


                                         28
             Next Steps

• The SF-PPR leads the way
  for other standard forms
  designed to streamline the
  post-award reporting
  process
• Standard and simplified
  forms allow grantees to
  spend more time on grant
  supported activities

                               29
            Post-Award Work Group
                 Forms Update
• Public comments are being reviewed and
  resolved on the following forms:
  – Research Performance Progress Report
  – Tangible Personal Property Report
  – Real Property Status Report
  – Federal Financial Report


                                           30
                 Question & Answer
                     Session
• Tom Cooley (NSF), Grants Policy Committee
  (GPC) Chair
• Andrea Brandon (USDA), Transparency Act,
  Grants Committee, Sub-Award Pilot Group Chair
• Michael Nelson (DOC), GPC, Post-Award
  Work Group Chair
• Diana King (HHS), GPC, Performance
  Progress Report Team Leader
• Elizabeth Phillips, Contractor for HHS/ACF 31
     Thank you for joining us!
     To view today’s webcast, PowerPoint
   presentation, and to submit feedback go to:
http://www.grants.gov/aboutgrants/grants_news.jsp


                                              32

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:4
posted:10/16/2011
language:English
pages:32