Docstoc

All About NSF - writing a compelling proposal

Document Sample
All About NSF - writing a compelling proposal Powered By Docstoc
					Applying to the National Science
Foundation

                  OSP Awareness
                       Oct 2010
          ospoff@syr.edu, osp.syr.edu
                NSF’s Mission

To promote the progress of science;

to advance the national health, prosperity,
and welfare;

and to secure the national defense.

Annual budget: $7 billion (FY10 request)
                   NSF organization..…
Supports all fields of fundamental science & engineering
    (except medical (bioengineering okay))
A.   Directorates
        Biosciences; Computer & Information Science &
        Engineering; Education & Human Resources; Engineering;
        Geosciences; Math & Physical Sciences; Social,
        Behavioral & Economic Sciences
B.   Offices
        Cyberinfrastructure; Integrative Activities; International
        Science & Engineering; Polar Programs
       Programs & Opportunities

Dear Colleague Letter

Program Description

Program Announcement

Program Solicitation
                    Types of Submissions
                  - currently all thru FASTLANE -
Letter of Intent
Preliminary Proposal
Full Proposal
Variations on the theme:
                                     – Collaborative proposals
  – Grants for Rapid Response
    Research (RAPID)                 – Equipment
  – EArly-concept Grants for         – Conferences, Symposia &
    Exploratory Research               Workshops
    (EAGER)                          – International Travel
  – Facilitation awards for sci. &   – Doctoral Dissertation
    eng /c disabilities
  – Supplemental requests (REUs,
    RETs)
          Submission “Deadlines”

Target Dates – “soft”

Deadline Dates – “hard” (5:00 p.m. local)

Submission windows – time frame; end date
“hard” (5:00 p.m. local)
           NSF Proposals Convey

1) the project’s objectives and significance to
science, engineering or education;
    • It’s a great idea that’s important to NSF Project
     Description, Summary


2) the suitability of the methods proposed;
    • The approach used is the best path to take; work
      is feasible and risks are reasonable relative to
      benefits. Project Description
       NSF Proposals Convey cont’d

3) The qualifications of the investigator, project
team and grantee organization to perform the
proposed work;
    • The investigator and the team possess the
      necessary expertise to assure project
      success. Biosketches

    • All necessary resources and facilities are
      available to assure project success.
     Facilities, Equipment, & Other Resources
        NSF Proposals Convey cont’d

4) the impact of the activity on the infrastructure
of science, engineering and education; and
    • Broader impacts may include enabling the
      next generation of scientists, engineers &
      educators. Project Description


5) the cost of the project.
    • There’s value for the investment; the cost is
      “in line” with similar projects. Budget &
     Justification
                Review Criteria

What is the intellectual merit of the proposed
activity?

What are the broader impacts of the proposed
activity?

Panel, mail review, combination
                  Intellectual Merit

Significance & impact - Importance to advancing
knowledge and understanding within and across fields
Significance & innovation - Suggest and explore
creative & original concepts?
Approach – Conception & organization of the activity?
Qualifications – Qualifications of PI/team (prior work)
Capability - Access to resources?
                     Broader Impacts
  Is discovery & understanding advanced while teaching, training,
  and learning is promoted?
  Broaden the participation of underrepresented groups
  Enhance the infrastructure for research and education, e.g.,
  facilities, instrumentation, networks and partnerships
  Broad dissemination of results to enhance scientific and
  technology understanding
   How will society benefit?
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2003/nsf032/bicexamples.pdf
                   In addition…

NSF staff consider…
Integration of research and education
– … efforts that infuse education with the excitement
  of discovery and enrich research through the
  diversity of learning perspectives.
Integrating diversity into NSF programs, projects
& activities
             What’s new in 2011?

Data management plan and sharing award
products – Supplemental Doc. May include:
– What’s produced: the types of data, samples,
  physical collections, software, curriculum materials,
  and other materials;
– Standards to be used for data and metadata
  format and content (where existing standards are
  absent or deemed inadequate, this should be
  documented along with any proposed solutions or
  remedies);
      What’s new in 2011? – DMP con’t

– Policies for access and sharing including
  provisions for appropriate protection of privacy,
  confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other
  rights or requirements;
– Policies and provisions for re-use, re-distribution,
  and the production of derivatives; and
– Plans for archiving data, samples, and other
  research products, and for preservation of access to
  them.
   • Include costs for DMP in budget!
         What’s new in 2011? Cont’d

No cost sharing.
– No voluntary committed effort.
Cover page:
– Performing/Research Organization changing to
  Project/Performance Site Primary Location
  information.
   • Why? To comply with FFATA
      What’s continuing from 2010

Responsible conduct of research
– All undergraduate, graduate students and postdocs
  compensated by NSF must complete:
   • CITI RCR training (all groups)
   • Face-to-face or other approved training (Graduate
     students / postdocs)
               Possible Outline (GPG)
NOTE: Program solicitations may specify organization and
   content; these guidelines should be followed.

1. Introduction to project and it’s purpose (Introduce
   objectives in first page or two)
2. Context in which project fits
   a. State of Knowledge – what is known, what’s not
   b. Preliminary/foundational data
   c. Significance of Project… So what?
3. Project Objectives – brief list of what you will do &
   their significance
                 Possible Outline cont’d
4. Approach/Experimental Design/Methods
   a. What will you do, how will you analyze and interpret data
      and results?
   b. How do you know your methods work? (What does
      “success look like? Controls? Evaluation process?)
   c. What challenges might you encounter and how will you
      work around them?
   d. Dissemination plan (including Data Management Plan)
   e. Time line/project management
5. Broader Impacts & integration of research & education
6. Prior NSF results
                Getting Started

Review Directorate/program’s web site
Review announcement or solicitation carefully
Review what’s been funded in the past
– http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
Contact Program manager EARLY
– You want to do what… might they be interested?
  Would there be other programs interested?
                     Writing…
Start early (2 weeks before the deadline not
recommended…)
Write for the reviewers
– Ask program manager how reviewed? Panel, mail,
  both?
– Make proposal a delight to read!
– Use meaningful/informative headers
– Don’t use full justification
– White space helps!!
                       Writing ….

Have others review your narrative
–   Clear? Are review criteria addressed?
–   Any obvious holes to be filled?
–   Broader impacts meaningfully addressed?
–   Scientific experts and “generalist experts”.
Write project summary last.
– Two separate sections  Int. Merit & Broader Imp.
             Fastlane and other issues
www.FASTLANE.nsf.gov
 – Register…
 – OSP can reset passwords if you’ve forgotten yours.


Formatting – Must follow GPG unless solicitation says
otherwise…
 – http://www.nsf.gov/pubsys/ods/getpub.cfm?gpg
 – OSP does get proposals returned for non-compliance
     • Biosketches, font too small, publications non-compliance, collaborators not
       complete
     • Project summary in first person, intellectual merit / broader impacts not
       separately presented.


Grants.gov is coming…(yeh – right).
               OSP resources…

**NSF proposal checklist (osp.syr.edu / forms)
  Amy Deppa (e- apps) asdeppa@syr.edu
  Amy Graves (CAS) ajgraves@syr.edu
  Meghan MacBlane (iSchool) mtmacbla@syr.edu
  Caroline McMullin (Maxwell, SoE)
  cmcmulli@syr.edu
  Stuart Taub (LCSmith) staub@syr.edu
  Trish Lowney (narratives) plowney@syr.edu

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:10/14/2011
language:English
pages:24