i4i v Microsoft

Reviews
Shared by: Ingrid Burke
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1681
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
8/14/2009
language:
English
pages:
0
Case 6:07-cv-00113-LED Document 414 Filed 08/11/2009 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION i4i LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and INFRASTRUCTURES FOR INFORMATION, INC., Plaintiffs vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:07CV113 PATENT CASE FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, consistent with the Court’s contemporaneous Memorandum Opinion and Order, and in consideration of the jury verdict delivered on May 20, 2009 and the entirety of the record available to this Court, the Court ORDERS AND ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT as follows: ! Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) is found to have unlawfully infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,787,449 (the “‘449 patent”). ! ! Defendant Microsoft is found to have infringed the ‘449 patent willfully. The ‘449 Patent is valid and enforceable, and Michel Vulpe is found not to have engaged in inequitable conduct with respect to the ‘449 patent. ! i4i, LP’s and Infrastructures for Information, Inc.’s (collectively “i4i”) damage award is found not barred by laches. ! The Court awards damages to i4i for Microsoft’s infringement of the ‘449 patent in the amount of $200,000,000. 1 Case 6:07-cv-00113-LED Document 414 Filed 08/11/2009 Page 2 of 2 ! i4i is further awarded enhanced damages of $40,000,000 for Microsoft’s willful infringement. ! i4i is further awarded post-verdict damages of $144,060 per day from May 21, 2009 until the date of this Final Judgment. ! i4i is further awarded pre-judgment interest of $37,097,032 up to May 20, 2009 and $21,102 per day thereafter until the date of this Final Judgment. ! i4i is entitled to post-judgment interest as provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 for any time period between the entry of this Final Judgment and the date upon which i4i receives payment from Microsoft as ordered herein. ! Microsoft is enjoined from infringing the ‘449 Patent. The terms of that injunction are contained in a separate Order of this Court. ! Except for the Court’s more detailed injunction terms as contained in a separate Order, all relief not specifically granted herein is DENIED. ! All pending motions not previously resolved are DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of August, 2009. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 Case 6:07-cv-00113-LED Document 413 Filed 08/11/2009 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION i4i LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and INFRASTRUCTURES FOR INFORMATION, INC., Plaintiffs vs. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:07CV113 PATENT CASE PERMANENT INJUNCTION In accordance with the Court’s contemporaneously issued memorandum opinion and order in this case, Microsoft Corporation is hereby permanently enjoined from performing the following actions with Microsoft Word 2003, Microsoft Word 2007, and Microsoft Word products not more than colorably different from Microsoft Word 2003 or Microsoft Word 2007 (collectively “Infringing and Future Word Products”) during the term of U.S. Patent No. 5,787,449: 1. selling, offering to sell, and/or importing in or into the United States any Infringing and Future Word Products that have the capability of opening a .XML, .DOCX, or .DOCM file (“an XML file”) containing custom XML; 2. using any Infringing and Future Word Products to open an XML file containing custom XML; 3. instructing or encouraging anyone to use any Infringing and Future Word Products to open an XML file containing custom XML; 4. providing support or assistance to anyone that describes how to use any 1 Case 6:07-cv-00113-LED Document 413 Filed 08/11/2009 Page 2 of 2 infringing and Future Word Products to open an XML file containing custom XML; and 5. testing, demonstrating, or marketing the ability of the Infringing and Future Word Products to open an XML file containing custom XML. This injunction does not apply to any of the above actions wherein the Infringing and Future Word Products open an XML file as plain text. This injunction also does not apply to any of the above actions wherein any of the Infringing and Future Word Products, upon opening an XML file, applies a custom tranform that removes all custom XML elements. This injunction further does not apply to Microsoft providing support or assistance to anyone that describes how to use any of the infringing products to open an XML file containing custom XML if that product was licensed or sold before the date this injunction takes effect. This injunction becomes effective 60 days from the date of this order. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of August, 2009. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Shared by: Ingrid Burke
Other docs by Ingrid Burke
US Chamber of Commerce v Edmonson
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Treasury v Ahmed, et al
Views: 276  |  Downloads: 3
South Carolina v North Carolina
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
AFFAIRE HUSSUN ET AUTRES c ITALIE
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
NRO judgment
Views: 265  |  Downloads: 0
Mutsinzi Report
Views: 54  |  Downloads: 4
smith v spisak
Views: 327  |  Downloads: 0
Hollingsworth v Perry
Views: 357  |  Downloads: 0
Starr v Sony BMG
Views: 366  |  Downloads: 2
US v Vulcan Society
Views: 357  |  Downloads: 2
Jackson v DC
Views: 416  |  Downloads: 4
USA v Moussaoui
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
Al-Bihani v Obama
Views: 96  |  Downloads: 4
Farrakhan v Gregoire
Views: 325  |  Downloads: 1
Related docs