CLS Partial Organization Chart

Construction Phase Functional Responsibility Communication Link CLS Partial Organization Chart CLS Director M. Bancroft Project Leader M. de Jong Project Administrator L. Carter Project Manager B. Hawkins Project Admin. Ass’t. A. Shenher Construction Manager M. Heikoop Health, Safety & Environment M. Bennmerouche Commission Leader Les Dallin Project Engineer Dan Lowe Work Pkg. 6 Leader E. Hallin UAC Kathy Gough Insertion Device Leader Ingvar Blomqvist Beamline Developer(s) Beamlines 1 to >~6 Beamline Scientific Advisors CLS Inc. Staff Scientists Engineers Shops Stores Support Technical Computer Administration Beamline Consultants TRADES - CONTRACTORS - SUPPLIERS (Beamlines) “CMCF” related Organization Chart Insertion Device Leader Ingvar Blomqvist Beamline Developer Pawel Grochulski Beamline Consultants Gerd Rosenbaum Beamline Scientific Advisors Scientists Juhachi Asai, Jack Bergstrom, Ian Coulthard, Jeff Cutler, Pawel Grochulski, Emil Hallin, De-Tong Jiang, Tim May, Johannes Vogt, Brian Yates Engineers Mechanical: Dan Lowe, Jason Fielden, Electrical: Neil Johnson Shops & Install/Align Mechanical: John Greefkes, Norm Strunk, Noel Craddock, Mark Besse Electronics: Tom West, Heinz Buchmann, Bob Crosby, Don Leclair, Wayne McWilley, Roy Thompson Stores Andy Brown Randy Mackenzie Support Safety: Mohamed Benmerrouche, Chris Bergstrom Technical Simon Chow AutoCAD: John Swirsky, Chris Bodnarchuk Vacuum: Dimo Yosifov Computer Office: Skeeter Abell-Smith, Darren Gilchrist, Tim Murphy Controls: Elder Mattias, Glen Wright, Tony Wilson Accelerator: Les Dallin, Xiaofeng Shen, Mark Silzer Beamline Development • • • • • • Stage 1: Concept Design Stage 2: Preliminary Design Stage 3: Final Design Stage 4: Construct/Fabricate/Test/Install Stage 5: Commission Stage 6: Operate Stage 1: Concept Design • • • • • • • Scope Roles Organization Reference Specifications Cost Estimate Schedule Documents to be issued or revised: – – – – – – – – Conceptual Design Report Orientation Meeting Report Clarification of Issues Meeting Notes Beamline Operations Manual Beamline Layout (block diagram) Commissioning Plan QA Plan Reference Specifications Insertion Device or Source point Absorber Slits Mirrors Monochromator Detectors Shielding Positioning, bending and feedback systems Endstation instrumentation Stage 2: Preliminary Design • • • • • • • QA Plan Buy or Fabricate? Items for “configuration control” Control system and Data acquisitions Cost Estimate Schedule Documents to be issued or revised: – – – – – – – – Preliminary design report Preliminary Commissioning plan Preliminary Safety Report Procurement Strategy 3D layouts (gross dimensions only) PFD/P&ID drawings Component specifications QA Plan Preliminary Design Report&Review Take reference specifications for each device and generate a description of the required component consistent with the Quality Assurance Plan Examine each component to determine its possible impact on personnel and machine safety Generate one document for each major component and an overall document for the entire line Include budget and schedule estimates Suggest reviewer(s) for the preliminary design report Submit a copy for review by safety officers Stage 3: Final Design • • • • • Refine Procurement Strategy (Design/Build) Update Beamline Operations manual Update Cost Estimate Update schedule Documents to be issued or revised: – – – – – – – – – Final Design Report Commissioning Plan Safety Report RFP documents for design/build/buy items Detailed fabrication documents for fabricated items Detail design documents for buy items Component specifications QA Plan Procedures manual • Review Final Design Final Design Report&Review Integrate Reviewers’ Comments and return to reviewer if necessary Address any safety related concerns Modify design (if necessary) for consistency with CLS safety and access requirements, consistent with the Quality Assurance Plan Generate Final Design Report Update budget and schedule estimates Submit copy for safety review (obtain regulatory approval to construct beamline) Generate preliminary installation, commissioning and operating plans Stage 4: Construct/Fabricate/Test/Install • • • • • • • Build and test components Integrate components and test Install and test in beamline Align beamline to monuments Develop operating procedures File amendment to CLS Safety report with CNSC Documents to be issued or revised: – – – – QA Plan Training documents Procedures manual Testing & validation documentation • Review test procedures & commissioning plan • Recommend beamline commissioning start Fabrication Design (Drawings) Issue fabrication drawings or request for tender Update budget and schedule estimates Issue Construction schedule and budget Update installation, commissioning and operating plan Stage 5: Commission • • • • • Align beamline to photon beam Measure conformance to reference specifications Commission beamline File Safety & Commissioning report with CNSC Documents to be issued or revised: – – – – – – – – User Training Manual Operating Manual and Procedures Testing /verification procedures commissioning and alignment procedures Safety measurements (report) “As built” drawings Acceptance documentation for the beamline Deficiency list • check beamline performance relative to reference specifications General issues for all beamlines • • • • • Quality Assurance Program Process for beamline design teams Resources for beamline design teams Construction/commissioning Schedule Construction/operation Staffing Some Technical details for the CMCF • Current plan calls for in-vacuum small gap insertion device • Monochromator similar to that used on the SBCCAT and SER-CAT beamlines • Endstation similar to that at the SER-CAT • UMA web site tool CLS Design Parameters Circumference Periodicity Optics nx (tune) ny cx (natural chromaticity) cy Momentum compaction Number Length bx (betatron) by d (dispersion) Frequency Total voltage E (energy) Bdipole Damping times tx ty tz E-loss/turn Dipoles Total Rad. SR Power Rad. SR Power per meter m m m m MHz MV GeV T ms ms ms MeV kW@500mA kW/m m 170.88 12 10.22 3.26 -13.9 -17.7 0.0038 12 5.2 8.5 4.6 0.15 500 2.5 2.9 1.354 2.4 3.8 2.7 0.876 438 9.76 Straights center center RF CLS Reference Specifications Energy (GeV) Current (mA) x-y Coupling (minimum) Horizontal Emittance (nm-rad) Time structure Lifetime (h) Maximum uncorrected closed-orbit distortion in x or y (mm) rms uncorrected closed orbit distortion in x or y (mm) Maximum corrected closed-orbit distortion in x or y (mm) rms corrected closed-orbit distortion in x or y (mm) Long-term rms (> 10 2s) horizontal stability (mm) Short-term rms (10 -2s to 10 2s) horizontal stability (mm) Long-term rms (> 10 2s) vertical stability (mm) Short-term rms (10 -2s to 10 2s) vertical stability (mm) 2003 2.9 100 <10% < 30 multi-bunch >4 10 5 100 30 30 3 5 2 2004 - 2005 2.9 200 <1% < 20 multi-bunch >6 10 5 100 30 30 3 3 1 > 2008 < 2.9 500 < 0.2% < 18 multi-bunch or single-bunch > 10 (or Topup) 3 1 30 10 10 1 1 0.2 CLS Source Point Sizes and Machine Functions Hrms Hdiv Vrms Vdiv mm mrad mm mrad 237 278 54 BM 1 2003 190 194 72 14 2005 159 182 30 6 2008 152 276 284 39 BM 2 2003 198 243 73 10 2005 178 235 31 4 2008 173 56 86 35 ID 2003 559 45 22 9 2005 465 43 9 4 2008 441 Note: multiply by 2.354 to get FWHM values eh ev h v nm-rad nm-rad 30 3 30 3 30 3 20 0.2 20 0.2 20 0.2 17.746 0.035 17.746 0.035 17.746 0.035 bx x m 9.67 1.09 0.76 9.67 1.09 0.76 9.67 1.09 0.76 Source ID_2003 D1_2003 D2_2003 ID_2005 D1_2005 D2_2005 ID_2008 D1_2008 D2_2008 E I GeV amp 2.9 0.1 2.9 0.1 2.9 0.1 2.9 0.2 2.9 0.2 2.9 0.2 2.9 0.5 2.9 0.5 2.9 0.5 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 by y m 2.46 25.79 26.94 2.46 25.79 26.94 2.46 25.79 26.94 x x m 0.00 1.01 0.56 0.00 1.01 0.56 0.00 1.01 0.56 y y m 0.00 -4.88 -3.53 0.00 -4.88 -3.53 0.00 -4.88 -3.53 x x 0.15 0.06 0.13 0.15 0.06 0.13 0.15 0.06 0.13 'x x 0.00 0.02 -0.16 0.00 0.02 -0.16 0.00 0.02 -0.16 Insertion Devices at the CLS • Insertion device designer has been hired (Ingvar Blomqvist) • Plans are to design in house and make buy/fabricate decision based on resource constraints. For example, support structure design and fabrication will likely be outsourced. • Current plans are for at least these IDs: – Superconducting wiggler for Hard X-ray XAFS (similar to that at MAX) – Small gap in-vacuum undulator for Protein Crystallography – An elliptically polarizing undulator for Soft X-ray Spectromicroscopy – A conventional undulator for the SGM Front Ends • Design and construction to be out-sourced • Possible vendors are being qualified; includes at least one consortium with a local connection • An expert from the APS (Dr. Deming Shu) has assisted us in the specification of the front end design • Expect to be ready to go out to an outside vendor for the design by February 2001 Canadian Macromolecular Crystallography Facility • Plan to build an ID and a second beamline later • Pawel Grochulski has been hired and will participate in construction and commissioning of a “model” beamline at the APS (SER-CAT) • Automation and robotic sample mounting will be part of the design of both beamlines • SSRL developed software (BLU-ICE) is being considered for the CMCF • A new proposal must be written and submitted for the second beam line Insertion Device Delivery Plan • Have hired an internationally recognized Insertion Device specialist: Ingvar Blomqvist (currently still in Sweden) • Ingvar will design the required magnetic structures which may be assembled off-site • Have identified four possible vendors: Danfysik, STI, Accel and SPring8 • These structures will be tested and adjusted onsite in the CLS Magnet Measurement Room; some final magnetic field adjustment may be done on location Small Gap Undulator Parameters 6 mm gap 18 mm gap 12 mm gap 24 mm gap Small Gap Undulator vertical field Radia simulation of small gap undulator vertical field (6 mm gap) X Z 0 0.75 0.5 Bz T   0.25 0    0.25 0.5 0.75  75  50  25 Y   0 mm 25 50 75 Radia simulation: vertical field integral (6 mm gap) Y 0 0.15 Iz T   0.1 0.05 0 mm   0.05 0.1  40  20 X   0 mm 20 40 Small Gap Undulator vertical field 18 mm gap Vertical field X Z 0 0.1 Bz T   0.05 0  0.05  0.1  75  50  25 Y   0 mm 25 Y 0 50 75 Vertical field integral 0.03 Iz T   0.02 0.01 0  0.01  40  20 X mm   0 mm 20 40 SGU Magnetic Structure Risks with an SGU •you need a large volume UHV vacuum chamber •you need a double set of girders, one set inside the vacuum chamber and one set outside. The alignment of the two magnet assemblies relative to each other is difficult. •some the RF fingers and the conducting sheet carrying the image current through the undulator presents engineering challenge. •the control of gap and taper must be more precise due to the short period and small gaps. •protection of the magnet blocks during baking by water cooling. •Standard undulator has about 200 poles in the magnet assembly and takes about 4 months of bench time to assemble, test and shim. With an SGU, the same process takes about 7 months because there are typically more poles (shorter periodicity) and the final assembly and alignment is complicated by the vacuum tank. •SGU has a potentially different impact on the machine than a “large gap” device IF it is the defining vertical aperture during some part of its operation. •Shimming can be done with the same degree of precision so there is no greater magnetic impact on the ring for an SGU compared to an LGU Protein Crystallography • • • • • PI Louis Delbaere: Louis.Delbaere@usask.ca Wavelengths: 1.9 – 0.68 Angstrom, 6.5 – 18 keV Resolution: 1.6 x 104 using Si(220) Typical Crystal size: 20 – 50 mm Design goal: flux of 1013 photons/sec into a 50 x 100 mm area • Design will be modeled after beamlines at SBCCAT and SER-CAT (APS) Staffing & Resources for Protein Crystallography • Minimize engineering and drafting resources required by utilizing existing designs as much as possible • Pawel Grochulski has been hired as a beamline developer – Began work November 1, 2000 – Became familiar with PX project in first two months – Spends first four months of 2001 building the SERCAT beamline at the APS and doing some user support at the SBC-CAT as a visiting scientist Issues for Protein Crystallography beamline • Insertion device type: conventional small gap in vacuum undulator or super conducting “out of vacuum” undulator – A feasibility study will be done by an outside contractor – Experience from MAXLAB will be used in making this decision (superconducting wiggler is being built and tested there) Protein Crystallography Beamline Layout Protein Crystallography Endstation