of the Pencil Urchin Phyllacanthus imperialis New

Document Sample
of the Pencil Urchin Phyllacanthus imperialis New Powered By Docstoc
					Reference:    Biol. BUN. 185: 77-85.    (August,   1993)

               Larval Development (with Observations on Spawning)
               of the Pencil Urchin Phyllacanthus imperialis: a New
                             Intermediate Larval Form?

               RICHARD           RANDOLPH               OLSON’~2~3,J. LANE CAMERON2%4, AND          CRAIG     M. YOUNG2
               ‘Australian Institute of Marine Science, P.M.B. 3, Townsville, Queensland 4810, Australia, *Harbor
                 Branch Oceanographic Institution, 5600 Old Dixie Hwy., Ft. Pierce, FL 33450, 3Department of
              Zoology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03801, and 4DAMES & MOORE, 500 Market
                                        Place Tower, 2025 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121.

Abstract. Information for understanding the evolution-                      occur during the shift from planktotrophy to lecithotrophy
ary shift from feeding to nonfeeding in echinoderm larvae                   in echinoid larvae.
can be gained from species whose larval development
pattern appears to be intermediate between these ex-                                               Introduction
tremes. In this paper we report the development of one                          The causesand consequencesof the evolutionary shift
such species.                                                               from feeding to nonfeeding larvae has become a popular
   The pencil urchin Phyllacanthus imperialis spawned                       topic in recent years (Raff, 1987; Parks et al., 1988; Wray
synchronously with the mass spawning of scleractinian                       and Raff, 1991; Amemiya and Emlet, 1992; McMillan et
corals at Lizard Island, Australia, in two consecutive years.               al., 1992). Among echinoids, feeding larvae (plankto-
Their large yolky eggs(507 pm diameter) developed into                      trophs) are considered to be the ancestral form, and non-
nonfeeding echinopluteus larvae with two pairs of larval                    feeding larvae (lecithotrophs) are thought to be more de-
arms. The arms were identified as postoral and postero-                     rived (Strathmann, 1974). Within this group of echino-
dorsal, which are the first and third pairs in typical echi-                derms, the shift from planktotrophy to lecithotrophy is
noplutei. A larval skeleton was present, with skeletal rods                 believed to have evolved independently as many as 14
extending the length of the arms. Five primary podia of                     times (Emlet, 1990; <f Strathmann, 1974). Although the
the juvenile rudiment appeared at 2 days of age. Meta-                      potential costs and benefits of direct development have
morphosis of the larvae and settlement began 4 days after                   been well discussed(Vance, 1973; Christiansen and Fen-
fertilization. Histological examination of 2-day-old larvae                 chel, 1979; Obrebski, 1979) the reasons for shifts in de-
revealed the presence of a developing gut, but no mouth                     velopmental mode are not completely understood.
opened in what would be the oral region of a typical                            Planktotrophy among echinoid larvae is known to be
echinopluteus, or the oral surface of the juvenile rudiment                 correlated with egg size (Emlet et al., 1987). Of the 276
in older larvae. Like other cidaroid larvae, this species                   echinoids reviewed by Emlet (1990) 66% have plankto-
showed no evidence of an amniotic invagination.                             trophic development and develop from small eggs(~350
   The larva of P. imperialis appears to be a transitional                  pm), whereas 20% have lecithotrophic development and
form between the morphology of feeding and nonfeeding                       develop from larger eggs(>500 pm).
echinoid larvae. Traces of the ciliary band in the oral re-                     Before our study, only three echinoids had been re-
gion and the presenceof arms typical of the echinopluteus                   ported with planktonic larvae that do not fall into one of
larva indicate its evolutionary past, whereas the large egg                 these two groups; Brisaster latifrons, which has a feeding
size and absenceof a mouth hint at its future. This larval                  echinopluteus that develops from an egg 345 pm in di-
form provides insights into developmental changes that                      ameter (Strathmann, 1979); Clypeaster rosaceus (egg di-
                                                                            ameter = 280 pm), whose larvae are facultative plank-
   Received     11 January   1993; accepted    17 May      1993.            totrophs, having the echinopluteus form (Emlet, 1986);
78                                                   R. R. OLSON    ET   AL.

and Peronella japonica (egg diameter = 276 pm), which              als (cf: Babcock et al., 1986). Numerous P. imperialis were
produces a lecithotrophic     “pluteus” with only two arms,        observed “perched” on the tops of coral heads or mounds
but shows normal development of the echinus rudiment               of rubble; one male P. imperialis was observed spawning.
(Okazaki and Dan, 1954). Here we report a fourth “in-              In the days following collection, spawning was induced
termediate” larval form.                                           in these urchins by injecting them with 0.55 M KCl.
     The pencil urchin Phyllacanthus imperialis is a member        Freshly spawned eggs were yellow-tan and embedded in
of the order Cidaroida, which is believed to be the most           a clear gelatinous outer coating that was viscous and sticky.
primitive extant echinoid order (Paul and Smith, 1984).            Spawned eggs were held together by this coating to form
It is common on coral reefs throughout the Indo-west               a strand of eggs that floated directly to the surface as it
Pacific but, being nocturnal and cryptic, is rarely seen           was released. Mean egg diameter was 507 pm (SD = 3 1.9,
even at night. Mortensen (1938), who collected P. imper-           n = 10).
ialis in the Red Sea, reported its egg to be 500 pm in                Additional urchins were collected on 9 December (five),
diameter, but was unsuccessful in attempting in vitro fer-         and 13 December (three). None of these urchins spawned
tilization. In this paper we provide the first description of      when injected with KCl; examination of their excised go-
the larva and development of P. imperialis, which has the          nads revealed that all were spent.
echinopluteus form but is lecithotrophic.                             The following year ( 1987) a few adult P. imperialis were
                                                                   observed early in November shortly after the full moon.
                  Materials     and Methods                        The density of urchins was considerably lower, and the
                                                                   urchins were not as exposed as had been noted the pre-
    Gametes of P. imperialis were obtained from adults             vious year. Approximately      10 urchins were collected over
collected at Lizard Island, Australia, during the summers          several nights, but only males produced viable gametes
of 1986 and 1987. Urchins were spawned in the days fol-            upon injection with KCl. The few females that did respond
lowing collection by injecting 5 to 10 ml of 0.55 A4 KC1           to KC1 injection released masses of what appeared to be
into the coelomic cavity. Eggs were fertilized within 1 h          undifferentiated   yolk material. Urchins collected in late
of spawning. Embryos and larvae were maintained in an              November also were not ripe. No male P. imperialis
open 3-l beaker at room temperature (29-3 1“C) without             collected at this time spawned when injected, and those
stirring. For histological and morphological examination,          females that did spawn produced egg-like irregularly
embryos and larvae were preserved in Bouin’s solution at           shaped masses of yolk. Urchins collected on 2, 3, 4, and
20 h and 2, 3, and 4 days after fertilization. To preserve         8 December and injected with KC1 all responded similarly.
the larval skeleton, a few larvae were preserved in buffered       Full moon occurred on 5 December in 1987. On the
 10% formalin. Embryos and larvae were prepared for                morning of 9 December, two females injected with KC1
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by dehydration in               released large numbers of eggs, the majority of which were
a graded series of ethyl alcohol through amyl acetate, dried       spherical and uniform in size. About a third of these eggs
at the critical point (CO,), gold coated, then examined            were successfully fertilized. The following day ( 10 De-
and photographed using a Novascan 30 scanning electron             cember) two remaining females were spawned, and vir-
microscope. Larvae for histological examination were de-           tually all of their eggs were uniform in size and shape.
hydrated to 50% ethyl alcohol, then embedded in JB-4               Fertilization of these eggs was nearly 100%.
embedding medium (Polysciences, Inc.). Sequential sec-
tions 2-3 pm thick were cut with glass knives and stained
with Richardson’s      stain. Larval skeletal pieces were ex-      Development
posed by corrosion of the soft tissues with 5% sodium                  Oocytes were opaque (yellow-tan in color) and floated
hypochlorite (household bleach) from 4-day larvae fixed            at the surface of the water in their culture beakers. A dis-
in buffered formalin.                                              tinct fertilization membrane was noted 15 min after the
                                                                   introduction of sperm. First cleavage was observed 15 min
                              Results                              later-i.e.,    30 min after fertilization (Table I). Ten hours
                                                                   after fertilization the embryos were ciliated blastulae ro-
                                                                   tating within the fertilization membrane and were still
     On the Great Barrier                     adult P. im-
                              Reef of Australia,                   floating. Twenty hours after fertilization the embryos were
perialis are usually cryptic and nocturnal  and are rarely         hatched swimming gastrulae, still opaque yellow-tan in
encountered even on night dives. However, on the night             color, and floating (Figs. 1, 5). It was not noted whether
of 20 November 1986, approximately        20 P. imperialis         gastrulation occurred before hatching. Twenty-four       hours
were collected by divers in an area less than 10 m in di-          after fertilization there was considerable variation in the
ameter. This was 4 days after the full moon and the same           morphology of the larvae, ranging from embryos that were
night as the mass spawning of acroporid scleractinian cor-         nearly rectangular with one pair of arm rudiments (Fig.
                                                                    URCHIN      LARVAL    DEVELOPMENT                                                 79
                                        Table    I                                         larva, a stomodeal invagination       (larval mouth) never
          schedule           oJ’Phyllacanthus        imperialis                            formed. In histological sections of gastrulae, large numbers
                                                                                           of intracellular yolk-like granular inclusions can be seen
Time   since fertilization                                        Stage                    within the mesenchymal,       endodermal, and ectodermal
                                                                                           cells of the embryo (Figs. 5,6). The cells of the embryonic
            30   min                            First cleavage
            IO   h                              Ciliated blastula                          wall and the archenteron are distinctly columnar, with
            24   h                              Swimming      gastrula, some 2 arms        their nuclei arranged distally within the cells. The re-
            48   h                              4 short arms                               mainder of the cellular inclusions other than yolk-like
            12   h                              Arms elongating,       rudiment visible    bodies are also located near the nucleus; the yolk-like
            96   h                              Attachment                                bodies are stacked into columns that are generally directed
           100   h                              Arms break off
           116   h                              Fully formed juvenile                     toward the center of the gastrula (Figs. 5, 6). The blasto-
                                                                                           pore is unusually wide, with the opening (110 pm) being
                                                                                           almost one-quarter the diameter of the entire embryo
                                                                                           (Fig. 5).
2) to larvae that were beginning to develop four equal-                                       Histological cross sections through the preoral lobe of
length arms (as seen at 2 days old; Fig. 3). A few of these                               early plutei show the hydropore opening on the dorsal
larvae were swimming just below the surface of the water.                                  surface of the larva, and that the hydrocoel, juvenile gut,
The first evidence of development of the echinus rudiment                                 and perivisceral coelom have all formed (Fig. 7; compare
was apparent within the oral field of these early four-armed                               Fig. 15a). Cross sections taken near the posterior of these
plutei (Fig. 3). A band of cilia, extending along the margins                             larvae show the extent of development of the water vas-
of the arms and coursing up onto the preoral lobe, can                                    cular system with the lumens of the primordial tube feet
be seen to be just beginning to form on these larvae (Fig.                                 having formed. Except for the perivisceral coelom, all
3). Three days after fertilization four-armed plutei with                                 coelomic spaces are filled with cellular and yolky-vesicle
well-developed echinus rudiments (Fig. 4) were distributed                                inclusions (Figs. 7, 8, 9, 10). The epidermis of the larva
throughout the culture vessel. Purple pigment granules                                    is a single layer of cells nearly cuboidal in form.
appeared around the preoral lobe of the larvae and along
the arms. Many larvae 3 days old had begun to settle on                                    Three- and four-day-old   larvae
the bottom and sides of the culture beaker. At this point
virtually no larvae remained at the surface of the water.                                    At 3 days the larva is fully formed (Fig. 4), and the
Six days after fertilization all larvae had settled and meta-                             juvenile rudiment is very conspicuous. A single contin-
morphosed into juvenile urchins. These juveniles were                                      uous ciliary band runs up and down the length of each
maintained for another 3 weeks in the beaker without                                      arm. At the juncture of the posterodorsal arms the ciliary
further care (changing of water or feeding).                                              band courses up onto what appears to be the vestige of
                                                                                          the preoral lobe (Fig. 11). The preoral lobe has undergone
Description of embryology                                                                 a torsion of nearly 45” to the left, as evidenced by the
                                                                                          twisting of the ciliary band on the preoral lobe (Fig. 1 I),
    Details of the first few hours of development were not                                and the ciliary band disappears along the distal edge of
observed, but observations on fixed embryos revealed that                                 the preoral lobe (Fig. 11). Oblique sections though 3-day
there was no wrinkling       of the blastula or gastrula. Ap-                             plutei show an extensive convoluted juvenile gut and fully
proximately 15 h after fertilization a typical smooth gas-                                formed tube feet (Figs. 9, 10). Juvenile spines and pedi-
trula was formed by invagination of the blastular wall at                                 cellaria are also present (Figs. 4, 13, and 14), giving the
the vegetal pole (Fig. 5). Histological sections of gastrulae,                            impression that 3-day-old larvae are in reality juvenile
20 h after fertilization, are reminiscent of the typical gas-                             rudiments with somewhat shortened larval arms. This is
trula of feeding echinoid larvae. The ectodermal wall is                                  similar to the larvae of Eucidaris thoursi as described by
relatively thin and there is a distinct blastocoel surround-                              Emlet ( 1988).
ing the archenteron. At this time the archenteron extends                                    The juvenile rudiment, with five primary podia, de-
approximately one-third the length of the blastocoel with                                 velops out of the left side of the larva (Figs. 4, 11, 12, 13).
the distal tip bending toward the ventral surface of the                                  There is no evidence of a juvenile mouth on the oral sur-
embryo at an angle of approximately         45” (Fig. 5). The                             face of the rudiment (Fig. 12). The posterior of the larva
timing of mesenchyme migration into the blastocoel was                                    shows a striking bilateral symmetry (Fig. 14). With cross-
not observed, but in embryos 20 h old, a large clump of                                   polarized light, the larval skeleton was observed to extend
mesenchyme cells was aggregated around the tip of arch-                                   to the tips of the arms (Fig. 16). The extent of development
enteron (Figs. 1, 5) and around its base (Fig. 5). Though                                 of the larval skeleton within the body of the larva was
the archenteron bends toward the ventral surface of the                                   obscured by the development of juvenile skeletal struc-
80                                                       R. R. OLSON ET AL.

                    Figure 1. Scanning electron micrograph of a fractured gastrula of Phyllacanthus imperialis showing
                 mesenchyme cells (ME) aggregated around the base of the archenteron. Note the small blastocoel (BC).
                    Figure 2. One-day-old embryo showing rudiments of post-oral arms (POA) and blastopore (B).
                    Figure 3. Two-day-old larva. PDA, posterodorsal arms; TF, tube foot; POL, preoral lobe.
                    Figure 4. Anterior view of 3- to 4-day-old larva. The preoral lobe has undergone torsion nearly 45” to
                 the left from its orientation in a typical pluteus. CB, ciliary band.

tures and the general opacity of the preoral lobe. Scanning             vestibule, which is an invagination that forms on the left
electron micrographs of arm rods showed them to be fen-                 side of the larva. In cidaroids, there is no vestibule (Emlet,
estrated approximately 1 mm in length with a lattice-like                1988), but juvenile structures develop on the left side of
plate at the base (Fig. 17). The larvae of P. imperialis                the echinopluteus in the same general location as on other
swim in a typical echinopluteus fashion with the anterior-              echinoid larvae. The onset of metamorphosis can be ob-
posterior axis oriented vertically and the posterior directed           served when juvenile structures are visible on the exterior
downwards much like the orientation of a falling bad-                   of an echinopluteus larva. These juvenile structures are
 minton shuttlecock (Fig. 13).                                          called the “echinus rudiment.”
                                                                           Settlement and metamorphosis of P. imperialis larvae
Metamorphosis    and description of juvenile urchin                     began 4 days after fertilization. Larvae settled by attaching
                                                                        themselves to the side or bottom of the culture vessel with
   Metamorphosis of the echinopluteus includes the for-                 their tube feet splaying their arms out radially. Within
mation of juvenile structures such as tube feet, spines,                4 h the tissue at the tips of the arms began to retract,
and pedicellaria, and the resorption of larval tissues. In              exposing the ends of the skeletal rods. Six hours after at-
the majority of echinoids with an echinopluteus larvae,                 tachment the tissue on all arms pulled back to the main
the first appearance of juvenile structures is within the               body of the larva. Over the next 4 h the four arm rods
                                                URCHIN    LARVAL   DEVELOPMENT                                                    81

broke off at their bases. Periodic upward jerking move-              opment in echinoderms. First, egg size increases; second,
ment of the spines may have facilitated this breakage.               typical pluteus structures are lost; and third, the appear-
Twenty hours after attachment all resemblance to the lar-            ance of juvenile features is accelerated.
val form was lost and small juvenile urchins remained.                    The pattern of development observed in P. imperialis
    Perhaps because the 4-day-old larva was virtually a fully        is consistent with all three of these criteria. The eggs of
formed juvenile urchin, little morphological change ap-              P. imperialis are larger than those of planktotrophs,        and
pears to have occurred either internally or externally at            some pluteal structures (such as the second and fourth
this point. Although numerous juveniles survived and                 pairs of arms and the mouth) do not develop. Finally
formed large numbers of spines, there was still no evidence          there is the rapid (when compared to planktotrophic
of a mouth on urchins 2 1 days old. The nutritional needs            forms) appearance of juvenile features. At 48 h after fer-
of the young urchins are probably met from remaining                 tilization, the juvenile gut is forming (Fig. 7), the primary
stored nutrients or possibly through uptake of dissolved             podia are visible externally (Figs. 11, 12, 13) even though
organic matter; this is similar to the early development            the larval arms have only just begun to develop, and ju-
reported for Heliocidaris erythrogramma     (Williams and            venile spines and pedicellaria are well formed.
Anderson, 1975).                                                         An important question in considering the apparent shift
                                                                     from planktotrophy      to direct development in echinoids
                         Discussion                                 is whether the loss of pluteus features occurs before, at
                                                                    the same time as, or after an increase in egg size and a
    The larva of P. imperialis is unlike any previously de-         loss of feeding ability. In P. imperialis many larval features
scribed echinoid larva. Its external form is surprisingly           have been retained despite the increase in egg size and
similar to a feeding echinopluteus,       yet it is completely      loss of feeding ability. However, there is clear evidence
lecithotrophic. The larva most similar to P. imperialis is          for the disappearance of other pluteus features. The ciliary
that of the Japanese sand dollar, Peronella japonica, which         band, which is well developed along the arms, is greatly
develops from an egg of 276~ym diameter into an echin-              reduced on the preoral lobe (Fig. 1 l), and not all pluteus
opluteus-like larva with two, three, or four arms (Okazaki          arms form. With the loss of feeding, the generation of
and Dan, 1954). The larva of P. japonica lacks a preoral            water currents around the oral region is presumably no
region and does not retain pluteal bilateral symmetry               longer necessary; these currents are known to facilitate
(Okazaki and Dan, 1954; Mortensen, 192 1). Phyllacan-               particle capture. It would be interesting to examine the
thusparvispinus, a congener also from Australia, has larger         effectiveness and structure of the preoral cilia in Clypeaster
eggs (700 pm) that develop into little more than opaque             rosaceus, which is a yolky facultative planktotroph that
spheres on which five primary podia appear just before              arises from 280~pm eggs. Since it has no obligatory need
settlement (Parks et al., 1989).                                    for particulate food material (although it does gain from
    In a review of the evolution of direct development in           feeding), are its preoral cilia reduced?
sea urchins, Raff ( 1987) identified four patterns of devel-             It is unlikely that the pluteus form in P. imperialis is
opment that could describe the transition from the feeding          secondarily derived from a brooded embryo (Strathmann,
pluteus to complete direct development (as in brooded                1974; however, see McEdward ( 1992) for an argument of
embryos). These patterns, which he loosely correlated with          re-evolution of pelagic larval development in an asteroid).
egg size, are (1) typical feeding pluteus (100 pm egg), (2)         The retention of pluteus-like       features in the larvae of
partial pluteus, non-feeding (300 pm egg), (3) direct de-          P. imperialis may be insignificant from the perspective of
velopment with a floating larva (500 ym egg), and (4)               the evolution of a form of lecithotrophic direct develop-
brooded by mother, complete direct development ( 1300               ment. More likely, the pattern of development displayed
pm egg).                                                           by P. imperialis provides insight into the transition from
    The larva of P. imperialis has features of both groups          a feeding larva to a nonfeeding larva and into the relative
2 and 3. It still has the echinopluteus form, placing it in         importance of certain larval characters in making such a
group 2, but the buoyancy of the larva and size of the egg         transition.
place it closer to group 3. Overall, it seems to be a more               In addition to its unique development pattern, P. im-
reduced larval form than Peronellajaponica       (Okazaki and      perialis also shows an interesting pattern of spawning be-
Dan, 1954) in that it is more yolky; however, it is not as         havior. At least at Lizard Island, this species spawns and
reduced as Asthenosoma ijimai (Amemiya and Emlet,                  the larvae develop coincidentally         with the scleractinian
 1992) which shows only the slightest of echinopluteus             corals of the Great Barrier Reef. In this region, more than
traits (i.e., little more than primary tube feet and two pairs       100 species of scleractinian corals mass spawn over the
of “para-arms”).                                                   course of three nights between the full and last-quarter
    Raff (1988) suggested that three major developmental           moons in late spring (Babcock et al., 1986). These are
changes occur in the shift to lecithotrophic       direct devel-   joined by many species of other taxa such as polychaetes
82                                          R. R. OLSON ET AL


        Figure 5. Light micrograph (LM) section of the gastrula of P. imperialis. Note blastopore (BP) and
     blastocoel (BP).
        Figure 6. LM close-up of the tip of the archenteron (AE), showing migration of yolk-filled mesenchyme
     cells into the blastocoel (BC).
                                                 URCHIN     LARVAL     DEVELOPMENT                                                 83

                   Figure Il. Dorsal view of 3- to 4&y-old larva. Note ciliary band which diminishes as it extends up
                onto the preoral Iok.
                   Figure 12.   View of the “oral region” of the juvenile rudiment from a 3day-old larva showing absence
                of mouth.
                   Fimre 13. Swimming orientation of 3- and 4-day-old larva,
                   Figwe  14.   Posterior view of a larva that is ready to settle. Note the presence of juvenile spines and
                dicellaria (PD).

(PA Hutchings, pers. comm,) and holothurians (RR0 pers.                 larvae are initially quite buoyant and develop near the
observation). In the two years that we observed P. im-                  surface of the water.
perialis, its spawning coincided with that of the corals,                   It would be easy to speculate that direct development
and similar to corals, it settled out of the water column               as observed in P. imperia/is could be a response to selective
4 to 6 days after fertilization (Babcock and Hey-ward,                  pressures that have caused this species and corals to eon-
 1986). Additionally, both P. imperiah larvae and coral                 verge on a similar pattern of development. However, direct

                   Figure 7, LM cross section through the preoral lobz of 2-&y-old larva. HY, hydropore; HC, hydroccel;
                G, gut. See Figure I5a for reference.
                   Figure 8. LM cross section through the body of a Z-day-old larva. FOA, preoral arm: G, gut; TF, tube
                foot, See Figure 1Sa for reference.
                   Figure 9.   LM sagittal section through the ptebral lobe of a J-day-old larva. See Figure I5b for r&rem%.
                   Figure 10, LM rag&al section through the preoral lobe and arms of a 3day-ald larva. See Figure 15b
                for rference.
84                                                           R. R. OLSON ET AL.


                                 b                                       b’


                      Figure    15. Diagrammatic representation of locations of light micrograph sections shown in Figure 7
                    (a:a’), Figure 8 (bb’), Figure 9 (c:c’) and Figure 10 (dd’).

lecithotrophic development in echinoids is not limited to                     throgramma (Williams        and Anderson, 1975) produce lar-
the Great Barrier Reef, or even to tropical regions. Phyl-                    vae that are ecologically similar to P. imperialis, yet these
lacanthus parvispinus (Raff, 1987) and Heliocidaris ery-                      species live in temperate habitats where the corals are not
                                                                                  It is difficult to determine exactly why a species un-
                                                                              dergoes mass spawning (Babcock et al., 1986); however,
                                                                              further examination of the spawning behavior of P. im-
                                                                              perialis across a broader geographic region might show
                                                                              patterns that point more clearly to the exact environ-
                                                                              mental cues that trigger such behavior. This type of study
                                                                              might also show whether the pattern of development ex-
                                                                              hibits any geographic variation that could provide insights
                                                                              into the evolutionary reasons for an invertebrate to shift
                                                                              its pattern of development from feeding to nonfeeding.

                                                                                  This project was supported in part by a Harbor Branch
                                                                              postdoctoral fellowship. We thank the Lizard Island Re-
                                                                              search Station for providing field facilities and the Aus-
                                                                              tralian Institute of Marine Science for logistical support.
                                                                              Field assistance was provided by A. R. Davis, E. M. Ley-
                                                                              decker, R. Z. McPherson, M. B. Olson, K. Osborne, L.
                                                                              Sullivan, and P. Watts. Special thanks to P. Dixon for
                                                                              videotaping metamorphosis and to P. Linley for assisting
                                                                              with SEM. This paper has benefited from discussions with
                                                                              R. Emlet and R. Raff. Harbor Branch Oceanographic In-
                                                                              stitute Contribution #965. University of New Hampshire,
                                                                              Center for Marine Biology Contribution #28 1.

                                                                                                        Literature        Cited
                                                                              Amemiya,   S., and R. B. Emlet.    1992.   The development and larval
                                                                                  form of an echinothurioid   echinoid, Asthenosoma  ijimai, revisited.
                                                                                  Biol. Bull. 182: 15-30.
                                                                              Babcock, R. C., G. D. Bull, P. L. Harrison,  A. J. Heyward, J. K. Oliver,
                                                                                  C. C. Wallace, land B. L. Willis. 1986. Synchronous spawnings of
   Figure 16. Light micrograph of the larval skeleton of P. imperialis            105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Biol.
highlighted with cross-polarized light.                                           90: 379-394.
   Figure 17. S.E.M. of a skeletal rod from one arm of a 4-day-old            Babcock, R. C., and A. J. Heyward.   1986.  Larval development of certain
larva of P. imperialis.                                                           gamete-spawning scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 5: 11 l- 116.
                                                                    URCHIN        LARVAL    DEVELOPMENT                                                                               85

Christiansen,     F. B., and T. M. Fenchel. 1979.             Evolution      of marine      Okazaki,     K., and K. Dan. 1954.         The metamorphosis        of partial larvae
     invertebrate   reproductive      patterns. Theor. Popul. Biol. 16: 267-282.                of Peronellu juponicu Mortensen,           a sand dollar. Biol. Bull. 106: 83-
Emlet, R. B. 1986.         Facuhative      planktotrophy   in the tropical echinoid             99.
     Clypeuster rosaceus (Linneaus)              and a comparison        with obligate      Parks,     A. L., B. A. Parr, J. Chin, D. S. Leaf, and R. A. Raff.
    planktotrophy       in Clypeuster suhdepressus (Gray)            (Clypeasteroida:            1988.     Molecular     analysis of heterochronic      changes in the evolution
    Echinoidea).     J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 95: 183-202.                                      of direct developing       sea urchins. J. Evol. Biol. 1: 27-44.
Emlet, R. B. 1988.         Larval form and metamorphosis            of a “primitive”        Parks, A. L., B. W. Bisgrove, G. A. Wray, and R. A. Raff. 1989.                Direct
    sea urchin,      Euciduris thonursi (Echinodermata:Echinoidea:Cida-                         development      in the sea urchin Phyllucunthuspurvispinus (Cidaroidea):
    roida), with implications       for developmental    and phylogenetic        studies.       Phylogenetic      history and functional        modification.   Biol. Bull. 177:
    Biol. Bull. 174: 4-19.                                                                          96-109.
                                                                                            Paul, C. R. C., and A. B. Smith. 1984.           The early radiation and phylogeny
Emlet, R. B. 1990.           World patterns of developmental        mode in echinoid
                                                                                                  of echinoderms.    Biol. Rev. 59: 443-48 I.
     echinoderms.        Pp. 329-335 in Advances in Invertebrute Reproduction,              Raff, R. A. 1987.        Constraint,   flexibility,    and phylogenetic  history in
     Vol. 5, M. Itoshi and 0. Yamashita, eds. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.                       the evolution    of direct development         in sea urchins. Dev. Biol. 119:
Emlet,      R. B., L. R. McEdward,                and R. R. Strathmann.             1987.           6-19.
     Echinoderm        larval ecology viewed from the egg. Pp. 5% 136 in Echi-              Raff,    R. A. 1988.       Direct developing       sea urchins: a system for the study
     noderm Studies, Vol. 2, M. Jangoux and J. M. Lawrence, eds. Bal-                             of developmental        processes in evolution.         Pp. 63-69 in Echinoderm
     kema, Rotterdam.                                                                            Biology, R. Burke, P. Mlandenov,               P. Lambert,     R. Parsley, eds. Bal-
McEdward,          L. R. 1992.       Morphology      and development       of a unique            kema Press.
     type of pelagic larva in the starfish Pteruster te.sse/utus(Echinoder-                 Strathmann,       R. R. 1974.        Introduction       to function    and adaptation      in
     mata: Asteroidea).        Biol. Bull. 182: I77- 187.                                        echinoderm       larvae. Thulussia Jugos. 10: 321-339.
McMillan,         W. O., R. A. Raff, and S. R. Palumhi.           1992.     Population      Strathmann,       R. R. 1979.       Echinoid larvae of the Pacific northeast (with
     genetic consequences of developmental             evolution in sea urchins (genus           a key and comment           on an unusual type of planktotrophic             develop-
     Heliociduris). Evolution 46: 1299- 13 12.                                                   ment). Can. J. Zool. 57: 610-616.
                                                                                            Vance, R. R. 1973.             On reproductive       strategies in marine benthic in-
Mortensen,        T. 1921.     Studies of the Development and Larval Forms of
                                                                                                 vertebrates.    Am. Nut. 107: 339-352.
     Echinoderms. G.E.C. Gad., Copenhagen.                                                  Williams, D. H. C., and D. T. Anderson. 1975.                   The reproductive    system,
Mortensen,        T. 1938.      Contributions     to the study of the development                embryonic      development,       larval development,        and metamorphosis        of
     and larval forms of echinoderms            IV. Kgl. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., Skr.              the sea urchin Heliociduris erythrogramma (Val.) (Echinoidea:                    Echi-
     Naturvid.      Math. Afd. (9), 7(3): l-59.                                                  nometridae).      Aust. J. Zool. 23: 37 l-403.
Ohrehski,      S. 1979.      Larval colonizing      strategies in marine benthic in-        Wray, G. A., and R. A. Raff. 1991.                  The evolution       of developmental
     vertebrates.     Mur. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1: 293-300.                                          strategy in marine invertebrates.            Trends Rex Ecol. Evol. 6: 45-50.

Shared By: