Unions and Collective Bargaining (PowerPoint)
Document Sample


Unions and Collective
Bargaining
Labour
Lecture 1
Dr. Toke S Aidt
Practicalities
• Course material on
http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/aidt/
teaching.htm.
• Office hour: Monday 12-13, room 31.
• Supervision assignment on web-page.
Purpose of course
• Economic approaches to unions and
collective bargaining versus industrial
relations approaches.
• Focus on theoretical models and
econometrical testing rather than
institutional details.
Overview
• Lecture 1: The orthodox view and the
monopoly union
• Lecture 2: Bargaining models of unions
and and the Hicks Paradox.
• Lecture 3: Collective response and
hybrid models of unions.
• Lecture 4: Empirical evidence on union
mark-ups.
The Orthodox View
• Unions monopolise labour supply and use
threat of a strike to share supernormal profits
with firms.
• This distorts the allocation of factors of
production.
• This leads to the monopoly costs of unions:
– misallocation of labour
– the hold-up problem.
– and many others
Misallocation of labour
WU VMPL in union sector WNU
DW cost
Wu
Wc
Wnu
VMPL in nonunion sector
Hold-up problem
• Union and firm share rents.
• The size of the rent depends on
investments in capital by firm.
• Firm anticipates that it will only get a
share of the extra rent generated by its
investment.
• Firm has incentive to under-invest.
• Inefficiently low levels of investments.
A theory of unions
Collective
Objectives
agreement
Conflict
Economics Strikes
constraints lock outs
What does the union
maximize?
• Economic welfare of the members w = union wage
n = employment
• No principal agent problem t = membership
b = outside wage
UT nu ( w) (t n)u (b) Utilitarian union
EU n u ( w) (1 n )u (b)
t t
Expected utility
The same?
Union indifference curves
EU u ( w) (1 n )u (b) (u ( w) u (b)) u (b)
w n
t t
n
t
Trade off between high wages
A and high employment of members
along indifference curve
High wage and high employment
increase union welfare
B
n
Firms
Profit maximization:
w constant
production function
pq(n) wn
elasticity
price
n
w pq' (n) n n( w / p)
Labour demand function
Product market conditions
(the economic environment)
Rents available for sharing…
• Perfect competition (takes p as given)
• restrictions on entry
• no non-union foreign competitors
• fixed capital
• Imperfect competition (face product market demand)
• High correlation between imperfections
• Product differentiation
Conflict resolution
Union wants high wages and employment, but
firms are only willing to employ many at low wages.
• Monopoly union model
• Right to manage model
• Efficient bargaining model
• Strike models
The monopoly union model
• All workers in a sector are unionised.
• Decentralized bargaining.
• Union sets the wage, w
• The firm sets employment given the wage
(the right to manage).
Note: No explicit bargaining takes place.
max w EU n w (1 n )b
t t
st n n( w / p )
w
wu b 1
w u
A
wu
b
n
nu t
Union mark-up
w b 1
u Elasticity of labour
demand
wu
• The more inelastic the labour demand the higher
the mark-up.
• No mark-up if demand is perfectly elastic.
The model in action
1. The Business cycle: labour demand shifts in and out
w
If the elasticity of
normal labour demand is
constant, then
wu the union model
predicts a sticky
nominal wage.
n
recession
wu n u
2. Outside option: 0 0
b b
w
low b Outside option improves
and the union wage goes up
wu
wu with indirect effect on
employment.
Outside options bad
n
in recession?
high b counter-cyclical
reaction of union
3. Membership effects: More members have no impact
on the optimal union wage.
Empirical implications
• b affects wages, but not employment
directly.
• Membership (t) has no impact on wages
• wages are sticky.
What is next?
• Bargaining and agreement (Nash
bargaining)
• Models of unions based on bargaining:
– right to manage model
– the efficient bargaining model
• Empirical evidence on these models
Get documents about "