Docstoc

385 Minutes - Verdict

Document Sample
385 Minutes - Verdict Powered By Docstoc
					Eugene D. Lee
From: Sent: To: Subject: caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov Monday, June 08, 2009 12:53 PM caed_cmecf_nef@caed.uscourts.gov Activity in Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-DLB Jadwin v. County of Kern, et al. Jury Trial Completed

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California - Live System Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 6/8/2009 at 12:53 PM PDT and filed on 6/5/2009 Jadwin v. County of Kern, et al. Case Name: 1:07-cv-26 Case Number: Filer: Document Number: 385(No document attached) Docket Text: MINUTES (Text Only) for proceedings held before Judge Oliver W. Wanger: JURY TRIAL completed on 6/5/2009. Plaintiff's and defendant's rule 50 motions argued and submitted. The Court gives oral ruling with findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Court instructs the parties to submit closing briefs with legal positions, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on the due process claim and FMLA/FEHA claims re the bench trial no later than 4:00 PM 6/19/2009, at which time the matter will be deemed submitted. Jury question discussed and resolved. The jury returns a verdict for the plaintiff. The jury was polled, thanked and excused. The Court orders partial judgment for the plaintiff to be entered. The parties stipulate to returning the exhibits to counsel upon conclusion of the bench trial. Plaintiffs Counsel E. Lee, J. Herrington present. Defendants Counsel M. Wasser present. Court Reporter/CD Number: K. Lopez. (Timken, A)

1:07-cv-26 Electronically filed documents will be served electronically to: Eugene David Lee Joan Herrington Mark A Wasser elee@LOEL.com, attorneylee@gmail.com jh@baelo.com mwasser@markwasser.com
1

1:07-cv-26 Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.58/2164 - Release Date: 06/08/09 17:59:00

2


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.