Docstoc

276 P MSJ - Opposition

Document Sample
276 P MSJ - Opposition Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 1 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 2 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 3 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 4 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 5 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 6 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 7 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 8 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 9 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 10 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 11 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 12 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 13 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 14 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 15 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 16 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 17 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 18 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 19 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 20 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 21 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 22 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 23 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 24 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 25 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 26 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 27 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 28 of 29

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 276

Filed 12/01/2008

Page 29 of 29


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.