Docstoc

209 Revised Scheduling Order

Document Sample
209 Revised Scheduling Order Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 209

Filed 08/25/2008

Page 1 of 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O. 11 12 13 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge IT SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Following the telephone conference on August 13, 2008 and pursuant to the orders issued therein, the Scheduling Order is revised as follows: Non-Dispositive Motion Cut-Off: Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing: Dispositive Motion Cut-Off: Opposition to Dispositive Pre-Trial Motion: Reply to Dispositive Pre-Trial Motion: Dispositive Motion Hearing: Pre-Trial Conference: Trial : ORDER September 2, 2008 October 3, 2008 September 26, 2008 October 14, 2008 October 17, 2008 October 27, 2008 November 3, 2008 December 2, 2008 vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:07-cv-00026 OWW TAG REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER Complaint Filed: January 5, 2007 Trial Date: December 2, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.