201 Revised Scheduling Order _Proposed_

Document Sample
201 Revised Scheduling Order _Proposed_ Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 201

Filed 08/19/2008

Page 1 of 1

1

2
3 4

5
6

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.

9

10 Case No.: 1:07-cv-00026 OWW TAG
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
11

Plaintiff, 12 vs.
13

Complaint Filed: January 5, 2007 Trial Date: December 2, 2008 Defendants.

COUNTY OF KERN, et aI.,

14
15

16 17 18
19

Following the telephone conference on August 13, 2008 and pursuant to the orders issued therein, the Scheduling Order is revised as follows: Non-Dispositive Motion Cut-Off: Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing: Dispositive Motion Cut-Off: Opposition to Dispositive Pre-Trial Motion: Reply to Dispositive Pre-Trial Motion: Dispositive Motion Hearing: Pre-Trial Conference: Trial:
ORDER

20 21

22
23 24
25

September 2, 2008 October 3, 2008 September 30, 2008 October 14, 2008 October 17, 2008 October 27, 2008 November 3, 2008 December 2, 2008

IT SO ORDERED. Dated: August _ _ , 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
By:. _

26 27 28 The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

I
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.