144 Stip re 1 month Continuance of Pretrial Dates REVISED

Document Sample
144 Stip re 1 month Continuance of Pretrial Dates REVISED Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 144

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3

Mark A. Wasser CA SB #060160 LAW OFFICES OF MARK A. WASSER 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 444-6400 16) 444-6405

5

AND PRE-TRIAL DATES AND ORDER 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to the minute orders of the Court issued on May 12 and May 16, 2008 the parties hereby stipulate to amend the pre-trial portion of the scheduling order as follows: vs. COUNTY OF KERN, et aI., Defendants. Complaint Filed: January 5, 2007 Trial Date: December 3, 2008

27
28

III

1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES AND ORDER

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 144

Filed 05/28/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4

Disclosure of Expert Reports Supplemental Expert Disclosure Discovery Cut-Off: Non-Dispositive Motion Cut-Off: Non-Dispositive Mc)t!cm Hearing Dispositive Motion Hearulg

June 16, 2008 July 16, 2008 August 18, 2008 September 2, 2008 October 3, 2008 5, October 20,2008

5

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: May _ _ _ ,2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DATES AND ORDER


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.