Docstoc

132 Stip re DFJ Examinations

Document Sample
132 Stip re DFJ Examinations Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 132

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 1 of 3

2 3

Mark A. Wasser CA SB #060160 LAW OFFICES OF MARK A. WASSER 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 16) 444-6400 444-6405

PLAINTIFF AND ORDER 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO THE ORDER OF THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel that Plaintiff, David F. Jadwin, shall submit to a mental and psychiatric examination by Dr. Robert Burchuk on Monday, May 19, 2008 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and Thursday, May 29 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in Dr. vs. COUNTY OF KERN, et aI., Defendants. Complaint Filed: January 5, 2007 Trial Date: December 3,2008

1
STIPULATION RE EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF AND ORDER

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 132

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2
3

Burchuk's office at 23522 Califa Street, Woodland Hills, California. Dr. Burchuk's telephone is 818-922-4900. The examination shall consist of an oral interview and evaluation and the one Memory Mallmgermg test orocedlure

4 raw test scores, dIsclosed to PlaJllltltt

evalua1:ion to be conldm;ted

Rick

~arKaslan,

on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 at 1

a.m.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 16, 2008

Mark A. Wasser Attorney for Defendants, County of Kern, et al. LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE LEE By:

lsi Eugene D. Lee (as authorized on 5/16/08)
Eugene D. Lee Attorney for Plaintiff, David F. Jadwin, D.O.

2
STIPULATION RE EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF AND ORDER

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 132

Filed 05/16/2008

Page 3 of 3

1

ORDER

2
3

The parties having stipulated as hereinabove set forth and good cause appearing

21

22
23

24
25

26

27
28

3
STIPULATION RE EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF AND ORDER


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.