Docstoc

76 Order Vacating Mx Prot Order

Document Sample
76 Order Vacating Mx Prot Order Powered By Docstoc
					Eugene D. Lee
From: Sent: To: Subject: caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov Friday, November 02, 2007 9:53 AM caed_cmecf_nef@caed.uscourts.gov Activity in Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG Jadwin v. County of Kern, et al. Minute Order

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Eastern District of California - Live System Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 11/2/2007 at 9:52 AM PDT and filed on 11/2/2007 Jadwin v. County of Kern, et al. Case Name: 1:07-cv-26 Case Number: Filer: Document Number: 76(No document attached) Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER: The Court has received Defendants' statement of withdrawal of motion for protective order (Doc. 73). The motion for protective order is withdrawn, and the November 5, 2007 hearing on the motion is vacated [56]. (Kusamura, W)

1:07-cv-26 Electronically filed documents will be served electronically to: Joan Elizabeth Herrington Eugene David Lee Mark A Wasser jh@baelo.com

elee@LOEL.com, attorneylee@gmail.com mwasser@markwasser.com

1:07-cv-26 Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to: David F. Jadwin 1635 Heather Ridge Dr. Glendale, CA 91207

1


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.