Docstoc

73 KC Withdrawal of Mx Prot Order

Document Sample
73 KC Withdrawal of Mx Prot Order Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 73

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 1 of 2

2 3 4 5

Mark A. Wasser CA SB #60160 LAW OFFICES OF MARK A. WASSER 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 444-6400 Fax: (916) 444-6405 E-mail: mwassen1Vmarkwasser.com

Bernard C. Barmann, Sr. KERN COUNTY COUNSEL 6 Mark Nations, Chief Deputy 1115 Truxton Avenue, Fourth Floor 71 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Phone: (661) 868-3800 8 Fax: (661) 868-3805 I E-mail: mnations@co.kern.ca.us 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants County of Peter Bryan, Harris, Eugene Kercher, 11 ,Jennifer Abraham. Scott Ragland, Smith I William . 12 I
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
II

DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.
Plaintiff, vs,

) Case No.: 1:07-cv-00026-0WW-TAG ) ) DEFENDANTS' WITHDRAWAL OF November 5, 2007 Time: 9:30 a.m. ) Place: U.S. Bankruptcy Courthouse, ) Bakersfield Courtroom 8
)

) ) )

MOTION

COUNTY OF

et al., Defendants.

) Trial Date: August 26, 2008 ) ) ------------)

~

Date Action Filed: January 6, 2007

TO PLAINTIFF AND HIS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Defendants hereby withdraw their motion for protective order, currently set for hearing on Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

27 28

III III
1

DEFENDANTS' WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG
1 Respectfully submitted,

Document 73

Filed 11/01/2007

Page 2 of 2

2
3 Dated: November 1,2007 LAW OFFICES OF MARK A WASSER

4

5
6

By:

/s/ Mark A Wasser Mark A Wasser Attorney for Defendants, County of Kern, et al.

7
8

9 10 11 12 13 14
15

16

!7
18

19
20 21

I

22
23

24
25

26
27 28

2
DEFENDANTS' WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.