Docstoc

20 Stipuation re Service and Response

Document Sample
20 Stipuation re Service and Response Powered By Docstoc
					Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 20

Filed 04/12/2007

Page 1 of 2

Mark A. Wasser CA SB #060160 ILAW OFFICES OF M..<\RK A. WASSER 2 '400 Dpitol Mal~ Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95814 3 i Phone: (916) 444-6400 , Fax: (916) 444-6405

1

4
5
6
7
i

E-mail: mwasserrii!markwasser.com
Bernard C, Bannan, Sr.

KERN COUNTY COUNSEL
Mark Nations, Chief Deputy 1115 Truxton Avenue, Fourth Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 Phone: (661) 868-3800 Fa'C: (661) 868-3805 E-mail: rnnations@cokem.ca.us

II

9

I Attorneys for Defendants County ofKem,
II
I

I Peter Bryan, Irwin Harris, Eugene Kercher,
and William Roy

I Jennifer Abraham, Scott Ragland, Toni Smith

12

13
]4 ]5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

]6

DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.

) Case No.: 1:07-cv-26
)

17
19
20

'
VS.

Plaimiff,

] 8 I)

COUNTY OF KERN, et aI.,

) ) ) ) )

21 22 23 24 25 26
27
28

Defendants, ) 11------------)

) ORDER

STIPULATION REi SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDUUG OF RULE I 26(1) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel
as fo Hows: 1. There are multiple Defendants in this action and they were not all served on the same date but they were all served by April 6,2007 Given the varying service dates, the parties agree that all the Defendants may file an answer to the First Amended Complaint on or before April 30, 2007. Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced with respect to the scheduling of discovery or trial.
//1
STiPULATION RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO fIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDULING OF RULE 26(1) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULD<G CONFERENCE AND ORDER

1

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 20

Filed 04/12/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2
3

2. Plaintiff may supplement his First Amended Complaint by adding factual allegations regarding a letter from the California Labor Commissioner and some other matters. The supplement will be filed on or before April 24, 2007. 3. The parties will conduct the Rule 26(f) Conference on May 4,2007 at a mutually agreeable time and location. 4. In order that the parties have sufficient time to prepare effective initial disclosures and a disoovery plan, the parties request that the Court re-schedule the Mandatory Scheduling Conference to May 31, 2007.

4 5 6 7
8

9

I

Dated, April.J.L.., 2007

LAW OFFICES OF MARK. A. WASSER

III
]2
13
14
15
Dated: April 11 ,2007

Mark A. Wasser
Attorney for Defendants, County of Kern, et al.

LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE LEE

16

]7
18

By:._ _++-"-'--J.L

.-J

_

19

E e D. Lee Attorney for Plaintiff, David

Jadwin, D.O.

20
21 ORDER The parties having stipulated as hereinabove set forth and good cause appearing therefore; IT IS SO ORDERED. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference is reset to Dated: April_, 2007 _

22
23
24

25
26
27

Ul\UED STATES DISTRICT COURT
By: _

28

The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger United States District Court Judge
STIPULAnON RE: SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCHEDULING OF RULE 26(1) CONFERENCE AND MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDER

2


				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: David F. Jadwin v. Kern County: 1:07-cv-26 in the United Stated District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division before Judge Oliver W. Wanger. This was a 2009 federal employment lawsuit that went to a bench and jury trial resulting in a unanimous verdict and significant judgment for the plaintiff employee. Issues involved violations of medical leave and disability discrimination laws, as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 procedural due process violation. Plaintiff was represented by Eugene Lee, a Los Angeles, California employment lawyer.