Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

prof-dev

VIEWS: 4 PAGES: 130

									   Professional Software
       Development
Shorter Schedules, Higher Quality
    Products, More Successful
   Projects, Enhanced Careers

      by Steve McConnell


           Matt Sawka
                About the Author
►   Steve McConnell is has a bachelor's degree Whitman
    College and a master‟s degree in Software Engineering
    from Seattle University.
►   He has been working in the Software industry since 1984,
    including being a consultant for Microsoft.
►   From 1998-2002, he was Editor and Chief of IEEE Software
    magazine.
►   He is currently on a panel of experts that advises the
    Software Engineering Body of Knowledge project and is a
    Vice Chair of the IEEE Professional Practices Committee.
►   Currently the CEO and Chief Software Engineer of Contrux
    Software.

►   http://www.stevemcconnell.com/
►   http://www.contrux.com/
                             Purpose
►   What is software engineering?
►   How does software engineering relate to computer science?
►   Why isn‟t regular computer programming good enough?
►   Why do we need a profession of software engineering?
►   Why is engineering the best model for a software development
    profession?
►   In what ways do effective practices vary from project to project (or
    company to company), and in what ways are they usually the same?
►   What can organizations do to support a professional approach to
    software development?
►   What can individual software developers do to become full-fledged
    professionals?
►   What can the software industry as a whole do to create a true
    profession of software engineering?
                        Organization
The Software Tarpit           Organizational Professionalism
   Wrestling with Dinosaurs      Software Gold Rushes
   Fool‟s Gold                   Business Case for Better Software
   Cargo Cult Software                 Practices
         Engineering             Ptolemaic Reasoning
   Body of Knowledge             Quantifying Personnel Factors
   Novum Organum                 Construx‟s Professional
Individual Professionalism             Development Program
   Orphans Preferred          Industry Professionalism
   Raising Your Software         Engineering a Profession
         Consciousness           Hard Knocks
   Building the Community        Stinking Badges
   Programmer Writing            The Professional‟s Code
                                 Alchemy
     Part One


The Software Tar Pit
         Chapter 1:
  Wrestling with Dinosaurs

“He that will not apply new remedies
        must expect new evils,
 for time is the greatest innovator.”

           –Francis Bacon
           Wrestling with Dinosaurs
►   “No scene from prehistory is quite so vivid as that of the moral
    struggles of great beasts in the tar pits. In the mind‟s eye one sees
    dinosaurs, mammoths, and sabertoothed tigers struggling against the
    grip of the tar. The fiercer the struggle, the more entangling the tar,
    and no beast is so strong and so skillfully but that he ultimately sinks.

    Large-system programming has over the past decade been such a tar
    pit, and many great and powerful beasts have thrashed violently in it
    Most have emerged with running systems – few have met goals,
    schedules, and budgets Large and small, massive or wiry, team after
    team has become entangled in the tar No one thing seems to cause
    the difficulty – any particular paw can be pulled away. But the
    accumulation of simultaneous and interacting factors brings slower and
    slower motion. Everyone seems to have been surprised by the
    stickiness of the problem, and it is hard to discern the nature of it But
    we must try to understand it if we are to solve it.

-The Mythical Man-Month (p. 3), Fred Brooks. 1975
         Wrestling with Dinosaurs
►   Has anything changed?
     ~75% of all medium-sized projects and 90% of or more of large
      projects are subject to excessive schedule pressure.
     Overtime is the standard.
        ► “Inmany companies, programmers faced with deadlines have been
          known to spend nights in the offices.” – Fortune, 1967
     Windows NT was projected to take 1500 staff-years to complete.
        ► OS/360   took more than 3 times this amount in 1966.
     The advent of web-development poses the question is delivering
      software quickly better than delivering quality software? McConnell
      argues that this is not a new phenomena.
      Chapter 2:
      Fool‟s Gold

“Hope is a good breakfast,
  but it is a bad supper.”

      –Francis Bacon
                  Fool‟s Gold
► During   the California Gold Rush of the late 1800s,
  many were deceived by fool‟s gold – iron pyrite,
  which has the same appearance as Gold.
► The last fifty years in software development has
  produced similar results. Software Engineers
  seeking solid processes and standards have mostly
  found fool‟s gold, software practices that appear
  useless on first glance, but are actually flaky,
  brittle, and virtually valueless.
                  Fool‟s Gold
► Problem:  Looking back further in history, how
  could we build one of the ancient pyramids from
  ancient Egypt?
   The stone blocks need to be moved 10,000 meters from
    the river to their final resting place.
   You have 100 days to move the blocks.
   You have 20 people to move the blocks.
   You are allowed to use any method you‟d like.
► On average, you must move the blocks 100
  meters a day (or have a method that will speed up
  the process later on).
► How would you accomplish this?
                  Fool‟s Gold




► Option   1:
   Immediately start pushing the blocks with brute force.
   Result: You move the block 10 meters a day and fall 90
    meters/day behind.
                          Fool‟s Gold




►   Option 2:
     Analyze the problem. You decide to cut down several trees and
      use them as rollers to move the block. Create a smooth, level
      roadway to push forward.
     Result: Although there is an initial investment to find the trees, it
      still will pay off.
                        Fool‟s Gold




►   Option 3:
     Implement option 2, but balance the pushers with pullers and add
      log-movers, so that a group is always moving extra logs in front of
      the block.
     Result: An improvement on option 2, the block will be continuously
      moving.
                      Fool‟s Gold
► Howdoes software development relate to ancient
 Egyptian pyramids?
   Change the pyramid block to a software development
    project.
     ► You   have 100 days to complete a project. This means you
        either have to complete 1/100 of the source code each day or
        you need to schedule some parts taking less time than others.
   Avoid “last-minute” syndrome (Option 1)
     ► The  development team has little concern near the beginning of
        the project, but has a frenzied push at the end of the
        development cycle.
                          Fool‟s Gold
►   How does software development relate to ancient Egyptian
    pyramids?
     Also avoid “code-and-fix” development (Option 2)
        ► Put a brute force of programmers on the project without properly
          planning or design of the software. The project team will show initial
          progress but will be unable to finish strong. Most effort will go into
          defects.
                      Fool‟s Gold
► The   Silver Bullet Syndrome
   An elephant could be capture to pull block. However, after it is
    captured, it tramples 2 workers and runs off. The managers then
    think they should‟ve spent time learning to handle the elephant.
                          Fool‟s Gold
►   As project planning matures, the amount of effort spent
    on later stages should be manageable.
►   Despite the downfalls, “code-and-fix” is still heavily used
    today for two reasons:
     It provides initial signs of progress
     It requires no training
                   Fool‟s Gold
► Focusing   on Quality
   If an organization can remove ~95% of their defects
    before a release, they can minimize the amount of
    effort spent on correcting them later.
                       Fool‟s Gold
► Software      isn‟t “soft”.
► Let‟s suppose you are designing a system to
  print a set of 5 reports, and eventually 10
  reports.
    How the reports can be “soft”:
      ► Isten an upper limit on thee number of reports?
      ► Will the future reports be similar to the initial five reports?
      ► Will all of the reports always be printed?
      ► Will they always be printed in the same order?
      ► To what extent will the user be able to customize the reports?
      ► Will users be allowed to define their own reports?
      ► Will the reports be customizable and definable on the fly?
      ► Will the repots be translate to other languages?
                            Fool‟s Gold
     How the reports can be “hard”:
        ► Defining  more than 10 reports.
        ► Defining a new report that is different form the initial set of reports.
        ► Printing a subset of the reports.
        ► Printing the reports in a user-defined order.
        ► Allowing the user to customize reports.
        ► Translating the repots to another language that users the Latin
          alphabet.
        ► Translating the reports to a another language that uses a non-Latin
          alphabet or reads right-to-left.
►   Bottom Line: Flexibility costs money. Limiting flexibility
    can save money in the short term, but can incur higher
    costs later on the development life-cycle.
              Chapter 3:
   Cargo Cult Software Engineering

“In the South seas there is a cargo cult of people. During the war they
     saw airplanes with lots of good materials, and they want the same
       thing to happen now. So they‟ve arranged to make things like
    runaways, to put fires along the sides of runways to make a wooden
       hut for a man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head for
    headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas – he‟s the
      controller – and they wait for the airplanes to land They‟re doing
      everything right. The form is perfect. It looks exactly the way it
   looked before. But it doesn‟t work. No airplanes land. So I call these
  things cargo cult science, because they follow all the apparent precepts
     and forms of scientific investigation, but they‟re missing something
                   essential, because the planes don‟t land.”

                            –Richard Feynman
Cargo Cult Software Engineering
► Process-orientedvs. Commitment-oriented
  Development styles
   Process-oriented
     ► Relies on a carefully defined process, planning, scheduling,
       and directly application of Software Engineering best-
       practices.
     ► This succeeds because the organization is constantly
       improving on their best practices.
   Commitment-oriented
     ► Also  known as “hero-oriented” or “individual empowerment”,
       this style relies on hiring the best people and asking them for
       total commitment to a project. They work with completely
       autonomy something work 60-100 hours a week until a
       project is completed.
     ► This style succeeds because it utilizes individual motivation.
 Cargo Cult Software Engineering
► Imposters:
   Process-oriented imposter (Bureaucratic)
     ► Observes successful companies using best-practices (such as
       NASA‟s Software Engineering Laboratory), see that they have
       many meetings and documents and emulate the deliverables
       only.
   Commitment-oriented imposter
     ► Observe  successful companies like Microsoft, and emphasize
       the long hours and large compensation packages, not the fact
       that the employees of Microsoft love to create software.
► Cargo-cult engineering is simply using a
  development style “just because” or “because
  the company requires it”, rather than using the
  style advantageously.
            Chapter 4:
Software Engineering, Not Computer
              Science


  “A scientist builds in order to learn; an
     engineer learns in order to build.”

                –Fred Brooks
                            SE not CS
►   Like other engineering disciplines, Software Engineering
    can be tailored for several objectives:
       Minimal defects
       Maximum user satisfaction
       Minimal response time
       Good maintainability
       Good extendibility
       High robustness
       High correctness.
►   Unlike other disciplines in which risk relies on the physical
    materials, Software Engineering carries risk in optimizing
    the project goals.
       Short schedule
       Predictable delivery date
       Low cost
       Small team size
       Flexibility to make mid-project feature-set changes.
                    SE not CS
► What  is the best way to think of software
  development? Is it a science? Art? Craft?
  Something else?
   ~40% of developers today have degrees in Computer
    Science.
   Scientists learn what is true, how to test hypotheses,
    and how to extend their knowledge.
   Engineers learn what is true, useful, and how to apply
    their knowledge to solve a problem.
► Is   Software Engineering just a buzzword?
   Some object to Software development being classified
    as engineering because the commercial market
    doesn‟t allow for the careful, time-consuming
    engineering process to be completed.
           Chapter 5:
        Body of Knowledge


“Truth will sooner come out of error than
              from confusion.”

             –Francis Bacon
              Body of Knowledge
► To be an expert in a field, a person needs to
  know around 50,000 pieces of information.
► But with software engineering evolving, how can
  anyone know enough to be considered an
  expert?
► Essence vs. Accident
   No Silver Bullet – Essence and Accidents of Software
    Engineering – Fred Brooks, 1987.
   Essence – properties that something must have.
       ► Wheels on a car
       ► Software engineering: Specification, Design, and Verification.
   Accident – optional properties.
       ► Air-Conditioning
       ► Software   Engineering: Coding and testing.
             Body of Knowledge
► Computer    programs are complex.
   At the center, the goal is to define underlying real-
    world concepts and debugging that understanding.
► Software   must be flexible and have the ability to
 change.
   If a program is successful, more people will use it and
    it will be adapted to be used outside of its original
    scope.
► Software   is “invisible.”
   It‟s not possible to create a 2-d or 3-d geometric
    model of the system.
           Body of Knowledge
► In  1968, NATO held its
  first conference on
  Software Engineering.
► McConnell estimates
  that in 1968, the
  average half-life of
  knowledge was about
  10 years, with only
  about 20% of that
  knowledge at the
  Stable Core.
         Body of Knowledge
► By2003, McConnell
 estimates that the
 average half-life of
 knowledge was
 about 30 years,
 with about 50% of
 that knowledge at
 the Stable Core.
        Body of Knowledge
► How can we categorize the Software
 Engineering “body of knowledge” (SWEBOK)?
           Body of Knowledge
► What   sources contribute to the SWEBOK?
             Body of Knowledge
► Whatinformation is contained within SWEBOK?
► SWEBOK Knowledge Areas
   Software Requirements
     ► The discovery, documentation, and analysis of the functions
       to be implemented in software.
   Software Design
     ► Definition of the basic structure of the system at the
       architectural and detailed levels, division into modules,
       definition of interfaces for modules, and choice of algorithms
       within modules.
   Software Construction
     ► Implementation of the software including detailed design,
       coding, debugging, unit testing, technical reviews, and
       performance optimization. This area overlaps somewhat with
       Software Design and Software Testing.
             Body of Knowledge
► SWEBOK     Knowledge Areas
   Software Testing
     ► Allactivities associated with executing software to detect
       defects and evaluate features. This includes planning, test-
       case design as well as the tests themselves: development,
       unit, component, integration, system, regression, stress, and
       acceptance.
   Software Maintenance
              and enhancement of existing software, related
     ► Revision
       documentation, and tests.
   Software Configuration Management
     ► Identification,documentation, change control of all
       deliverables generated on a project (source code, content,
       requirements, etc…).
   Software Quality
     ► Allactivities associated with providing confidence that a
       software item conforms or will conform to technical
       requirements.
             Body of Knowledge
► SWEBOK     Knowledge Areas
  Software Engineering Management Plan
    ►Planning,  tracking and controlling of software
      projects, work, and organizations.
  Software Engineering Tools and Methods
    ►Tolls and methodologies support (CASE tools,
      reusable libraries, formal methods and practices,
      etc…).
  Software Engineering Process
    ►Activities related to improving development quality,
      timeliness, productivity, and other characteristics.
  http://www.swebok.org/
             Chapter 6:
           Novum Organum


“A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.”

               –Francis Bacon
                 Novum Organum
►   In the 1620s, Francis Bacon
    published Instauratio Magna
    which attempted to redefine
    scientific inquiry. Within this
    work is an essay, Novum
    Organum which challenges his
    colleagues to focus on scientific
    methodologies rather than
    deductive reasoning when
    studying the world. His view of
    the scientific method had three
    steps:
     Purge your mind of prejudices
      (superstition)
     Collect observations and experiences
      systematically.
     Stop, survey what you‟ve seen, and
      draw an initial conclusion.
               Novum Organum
► Whatdoes it mean to have a Software
 Engineering “profession”?
   According to the Code of Federal Regulations, a
    profession has:
     ►A  requirement for extensive learning and training
     ► A code of ethics imposing standards higher than those normally
       tolerated in the marketplace.
     ► A disciplinary system for professionals who breach the code
     ► A primary emphasis on social responsibility over strictly
       individual gain, and a corresponding duty of its members to
       behave as members f a disciplined and honorable profession.
     ► A prerequisite of a license priori to admission to practice.
                Novum Organum

► IsSoftware
  Engineering a
  profession?
   The Software
    Engineering Institute
    (SEI) has identified 8
    elements of a mature
    profession.
                   Novum Organum

► Elements   to a mature profession:
   Initial Professional Education
     ► Completing   a university program in their field.
   Accreditation
     ► The university program is accredited by an oversight body that
       determines if the program provides adequate education.
       Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)
       oversees American engineering programs.
   Skills Development
     ► Education  is not enough to develop full professional capabilities,
       some type of further experience is needed to perform the job
       individually with a satisfactory level of competence.
                    Novum Organum

► Elements   to a mature profession:
   Certification
     ►A  professional is requirements to pass one or more exams that
       ensures they have a minimum level of knowledge.
   Licensing
     ► Similarto certification, this is a mandatory exam administered by
       a overrunning authority.
   Professional Development
     ► Ongoing professional education to maintain or improve a worker‟s
       knowledge and skills.
                   Novum Organum

► Elements   to a mature profession:
   Professional Societies
     ►A  Community of like-minded individuals who put their professional
       standards above their self-interest.
   Code of Ethics
     ► Ensures   that a profession‟s practitioners behave responsibly.
   *Organizational Certification
     ► Organizations   must also be certified.
                   Novum Organum

► Maturity   Levels for the elements
   Nonexistence
     ► The   element simply doesn‟t exist.
   Ad Hoc
     ► The   element exists, but only in isolated instances
   Established
     ► The   element exists and is clearly identifiable.
   Maturing
     ► The element has existed for many years and is being maintained
       and improved.
                  Novum Organum

► How    does Software Engineering rank?
     Initial Professional Education – Ad Hoc to Established
     Accreditation – Established
     Skills Development – Established
     Licensing – Ad Hoc
     Professional Development – Ad Hoc
     Professional Societies – Established
     Code of Ethics – Established
     Organizational Certification - Established
       The Software Tar Pit Summary
► Wrestling with Dinosaurs
    Has anything changed?
► Fool‟s Gold
    Building the Egyptian Pyramids
    Code-And-Fix, Last-Minute, Silver-Bullet
    Software isn‟t “soft.”
► Cargo Cult Software Engineering
    Process-Oriented vs. Commitment-oriented
► Software Engineering Not Computer Science
► Body of Knowledge
    SWEBOK
► Novum Organum
    What is a profession?
        Part Two


Individual Professionalism
                  Chapter 7:
               Orphans Preferred
“Wanted: Young, skinny, wirey fellows not over 18. Must be
  expert riders willing to risk death daily. Orphans preferred.
                        Wages $25/week.”
                      -Pony Express, 1860

 “We realize the skills, intellect, and personality we seek are
   rare, and our compensation plan reflects that. In return,
      we expect TOTAL AND ABSOLUTE COMMITMENT to
      project success – overcoming all obstacles to create
            applications on time and within budget.”
         –Jobs Rated Almanac, 1995 for an SE posting.
                    Orphans Preferred
►   “The stereotypical programmer is a shy young man who works in a
    darkened room, intensely concentrating on magical incantations that
    make the computer do his bidding. He can concentrate for 12 to 16
    hours at a time, often working through the night to make his artistic
    vision a reality. He subsists on pizza and Twinkies. When interrupted,
    the programming creature responds violently, hurling strings of cryptic
    acronyms at his interrupter – “TCP/IP, RPC, RCS, ACM, and IEEE!” he
    yells. The programmer breaks his intense concentration only to attend
    Star Trek conventions and watch Monty Python reruns. He is sometimes
    regarded as an indispensable genius, sometimes as an eccentric artist.
    Vital information is stored in his head and his head alone. He is secure
    in his job, knowing that, valuable as he is, precious few people compete
    for his job.”
                 Orphans Preferred
►   Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator
     Extroversion (E) vs. Introversion (I)
        ► Extroverts are focused on the outside world, people. Introverts
          focus on the world of ideas.
     Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N)
        ► How  a person deals with decision-making data. Sensing persons
          focus on facts, concrete data and experience. Intuitive people look
          for possibilities and focus on conceptual theories.
     Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)
        ► How  a person makes a decision. The thinkers make objective,
          analytic decisions, where as feelers rely on emotions and feelings.
     Perceiving (P) vs. Judging (J)
        ► Theperceiving person is flexible and likes open-ended possibilities,
          where as the judging person prefers control and order.
             Orphans Preferred
► Meyers-Briggs     and Software Developers
   Most Software Developers (25-40%) are ISTJ.
     ► 50-75% of programmers are introverts, compared to 25% in
      the general population.
         About 60% of software developers have at least a Bachelors,
          compared to 30% of the general population.
     ► 80-90%   of programmers are Thinking (T) compared to 50%
       of the general population.
     ► There‟s a 50-50% split of programmers between Sensing (S)
       and Intuition (N).
             Orphans Preferred
► Meyers-Briggs     and Designers
   Great Designers…
     ►  can general move in-between categories.
     ► have a mastery of common tools.
     ► aren‟t afraid of complexity.
     ► seek out constructive criticism.
     ► have experienced failed projects.
     ► are not afraid of the brute-force approach.
     ► must be creative.
     ► have a restless desire to create.
                Orphans Preferred
► Total   and Absolute Commitment
   Although working 12 to 16 hours may seem extreme,
    it‟s not out of the realm of possibility. Many Microsoft
    programmers working this or more during the
    development of Windows NT.
     ► “Work       pervades their existence. Friends fade into the
          background. The ties of marriage fray or rip apart. Children
          are neglected or deferred. Hobbies wither. Computer code
          comes to mean everything. If private dreams are nursed at
          al, it is only to ease the pain of creating NT.” – P. Zachary
   Programmers tend to show a loyalty to the project,
    even if their loyalty to the company is waning.
   Some programmers aim to be “hero” programmers,
    who take on mountains of work and hours.
                Orphans Preferred
►   Demographics                    Highest level of      % of
     The average programmer        Education             developers
      age peaks between 30-35
      years old (which is about     High school or less     11.8%
      10 years younger than
      most professions).              Some college,         17.2%
     72% of computer and
                                        no degree
      information science BSs
      and 83% of Ph. D‟s were       Associate‟s degree      11.0%
      men.
     Only 17% of high-schoolers
                                     Bachelor‟s degree      47.4%
      taking the AP Computer
      Science test were female.
      This is the lowest % of all    Graduate degree        12.8%
      AP tests.
                  Orphans Preferred
► Job    Prospects
Job breakdown for software workers               Current Software prsnl in US
 Computer and information scientists, research               28,000
           Computer programmers                             585,000

  Computer software engineers, applications                 380,000
Computer software engineers, systems software               317,000
          Computer systems analysts                         431,000
  Network systems and data comm. analysts                   119,000
          Other computer specialists                        203,000
                     Total                                 2,063,000
             Chapter 8:
Raising Your Software Consciousness
“If a man will begin with certainties, he shall
   end in doubts; but if he will be content to
       begin with doubts, he shall end in
                  certainties”

               -Francis Bacon
Raising Your Software Consciousness
► Inthe 1970s, Charles Reich published, The
  Greening of America, which identified 3 types of
  awareness
   Consciousness I (Con I): Pioneer mentality
       ► Great   emphasis on independence and self-satisfaction
   Consciousness II (Con II): Gray flannel suit mentality
       ► The corporate man. Knowing how to get along with other and
        playing by the rules
   Consciousness III (Con III): Enlightened Independence
       ► Operates on the basis of principles, with little regard for the
        rules of Con II and without the selfishness of Con I.
Raising Your Software Consciousness
► Inthe 1970s, Charles Reich published, The
  Greening of America, which identified 3 types of
  awareness
   Consciousness I (Con I): Pioneer mentality
       ► Great   emphasis on independence and self-satisfaction
   Consciousness II (Con II): Gray flannel suit mentality
       ► The corporate man. Knowing how to get along with other and
        playing by the rules
   Consciousness III (Con III): Enlightened Independence
       ► Operates on the basis of principles, with little regard for the
        rules of Con II and without the selfishness of Con I.
Raising Your Software Consciousness
► Consciousness       and Software Development
   Con I – Self Reliance
     ► Software    developers who are “Lone Rangers”. They have little
       tolerance for other ideas.
     ► Little training is needed. This approach works adequately in
       small projects.
   Con II – Rules
     ► Rules   allow programmers to work with others.
   Con III – Principles
     ► Programmers    understand that the rules from Con II are based
       on principle. Programmers focus on the underlying effective of
       their actions on software development.
              Chapter 9:
       Building the Community
“If any human being earnestly desires to push on
  the new discoveries instead of just retaining and
   using the old; to win victories over Nature as a
     worker rather than over hostile critics as a
        disputant; to attain, in fact, clear and
 demonstrative knowledge instead of attractive and
   probable theory; we invite him as a true son of
             Science to join our ranks.”

                 -Francis Bacon
          Building the Community
► It‟simportant to remember that we‟re not simply
  lone-ranger programmers, or even programmers
  for one company, but rather a community of
  professionals.
    IEEE
    ACM
► These organizations can provide solutions to
  common problems or articles to further your
  understanding of the field.
             Chapter 10:
      Architects and Carpenters
“Engineers produce plans Builders implement
       the plans to produce a product.”

              -Terri Maginnis
         Architects and Carpenters
►   As Software Engineering continues to develop, a wider
    range of abilities will begin to distinguish itself.
     Average software developers
     Highly skilled software developers
     Unlicensed software engineers/certified software technologists
      (coders).
     Professional Software Engineers
►   The average person who earns a professional degree earns
    50% more than someone without.
►   The average person who earns a master‟s degree will earn
    25% more than someone without.
        Architects and Carpenters
► Job   Specialization
   The Surgical
    Team, proposed
    by Fred Brooks in
    The Mythical Man-
    Month
         Architects and Carpenters
► Job   specializations today
   Technology
        ► Software   Technologist
            Knowledge of specific technologies (Microsoft, Novell, Oracle,
             Apple)
   Software Engineering
        ► Software   Engineers
            Architecture, configuration control, cost estimation, customer
             support, database administration, education and training, function
             point counting, human factors, information systems, integration,
             maintenance and enhancement, measurement, network, package
             acquisition, performance, planning, process improvement, quality
             assurance, requirements, reusability, standards, systems software
             support, technical writing, testing, tools development.
        Architects and Carpenters
► Team    Specializations
     Construction lead
     Design lead
     Planning and tracking lead
     Project business manager
     Quality assurance lead
     Requirements lead
             Chapter 11:
         Programmer Writing
“Read not to contradict and confute, nor to
 believe and tae for granted, nor to find talk
 and discourse, but to weigh and consider.”

              -Francis Bacon
                Programmer Writing
►   “The gap between the best software engineering practice
    and the average practice is very wide – perhaps wider than
    in any other engineering discipline. A tool that
    disseminates good practice would be important.”
        – No Silver Bullet, Fred Brooks
►   According to McConnell, there are six types of authors:
       Recent retirees
       University professors
       Seminar instructors
       Consultants
       Think-tank developers
       Developers working on production software.
►   Who should be writing our documentation?
                 Programmer Writing
►   “In this distribution of functions, the scholar is the delegated intellect.
    In the right state, he is, Man Thinking. In the degenerate state, when
    the victim of society, he tends to become a mere thinker, or, still
    worse, the parrot of other men's thinking.

    …I learn immediately from any speaker how much he has already
    lived, through the poverty or the splendor of his speech. Life lies
    behind us as the quarry from whence we get tiles and copestones for
    the masonry of today. This is the way to learn grammar. Colleges and
    books only copy the language which the field and the work-yard
    made.“
          -Excepts from ‟The American Scholar‟ by Ralph Waldo
          Emerson (1837), http://www.emersoncentral.com/amscholar.htm

►   Is there a disconnect between academia and the work-force? Are we
    still thinking for ourselves? Or merely “thinking” of what others have
    thought through?
               Programmer Writing
►   “James Fenimore Cooper syndrome”
     In The Deerslayer, Cooper writes that 6 Indians climbed onto
      sapling to board a scow coming downstream.
     Mark Twain described this as a fantasy situation. Because of his
      knowledge of riverboat piloting, he knew this situation was not
      plausible with the sapling or with the dimensions of the scow.
     This syndrome represents a practitioner calling into the question
      the writings of a scholar.
►   Does the Software Engineering literature suffer from James
    Fenimore Cooper Syndrome?
              Individual Professionalism
►   Orphans Preferred
     Meyers Briggs and Software Engineering demographics
►   Raising your Software Consciousness
     The Greening of America
►   Building the Community
      IEEE and ACM
►   Architects and Carpenters
     Specializations
►   Programmer Writing
     „The American Scholar‟
     James Fenimore Cooper Syndrome
         Part Three


Organizational Professionalism
           Chapter 12:
      Software Gold Rushes
“Prosperity doth best discover vice, but
  adversity doth best discover virtue.”
             -Francis Bacon

“The root of all superstition is that men
       observe when a thing hits,
       but not when it misses.”
            -Francis Bacon
                Software Gold Rushes
►   In 1848, gold was discovered in riverbeds in California.
    Many self-proclaimed entrepreneurs set out to make their
    fortune. This made up the California Gold Rush. But, by
    mid-1849, the majority of the easily found gold was
    collected. Many miners would spent hours a day digging
    through freezing water looking for any traces of the metal.
    By the 1850s, most miners had joined corporations to
    continue their hunts.
►   Software development experienced a similar phenomena.
    There are a few success stories (Bill Gates and Paul Allen of
    Microsoft; Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak of Apple, Bob
    Frankston and Dan Bricklin of VisiCalc), but many failures as
    well.
             Software Gold Rushes
► Much of the “software gold rush” is characterized by high-
  risk projects, long hours, hacking, informal or no processes,
  little-to-no documentation, and very little quality assurance.
► Post-gold rush development has en emphasis on lower-risk,
  high capital projects, larger teams, formal processes, and
  general standards. There isn‟t an effort to rush projects out
  the door, but rather do thorough testing.
► Post-gold rush consumers are generally more demanding on
  the products that they are looking to buy.
► Many companies that survive a gold-rush would not be able
  to survive a second.
              Chapter 13:
Business Case for Better Software Practices

  “When you can measure what you are
 speaking about, and express it in numbers,
you know something about it; but when you
    cannot measure it, when you cannot
express it in numbers, your knowledge is of
     a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
             -Lord Kelvin, 1893
   Business Case for Better Software Practices
► Development     practices pay off
   In 1994 James Herbsleb prepared a study of 13
    organizations‟ “business value” (similar to Return On
    Investment).
     ► In 1995, systemic improvements increased the ROI anywhere
       from 500-900%.
   In 1997, Rini van Solingen found an increase ranging
    from 700-1900%.
   In 2000, Caspers Jones found that the ROI could easily
    be in the double digits (over 1000%).
   In 2001, Watts Humphrey found an ROI increase of
    500%.
   Business Case for Better Software Practices
► Current    organizational effectiveness
   A study funded by the SEI found that those organizations who implemented
    a change to their development practice found an average of 35% gain in
    productivity, 19% schedule reduction, and post-release defects were reduced
    by 39%.
   The same study found that for the best-case scenarios, 58% productivity
    could be gained over 4 years, a compounded gain of 500% was achieved, a
    23%/year schedule reduction (with a 91% reduction over 6 years), and post-
    release defects were reduced by 99%.
   Business Case for Better Software Practices
Organization                        Results
BDN International                   ROI 300%
Boeing Information System           Estimates within ~20%, $5.5 million saved
                                    in 1 year, ROI 775%
Computer Sciences Corporation       65% reduction in error rate
General Dynamics Decision Systems   70% reduction in rework; 94% defect rate
                                    reduction (drr), 2.9*productivity gain
Harris ISD DPL                      90% drr, 2.5*productivity gain, ROI 900%
Hughes                              $2 million reduction in costs, ROI 500%
IBM Toronto                         90% drr, 80% reduction in rework
Motorola GED                        2-3*productivity gain, 2-7*cycle reduction
                                    time, ROI 677%
Philips                             ROI 750%
Raytheon                            ROI 770%
Schlumberger                        4*reduction in released defects
  Business Case for Better Software Practices
Organization                       Results
Siemens                            90% reduction in released defects
Telcorida                          Defect 1/10 industry aver, customer
                                   satisfaction up from 60% to 91%
Texas Instruments – Systems        90% reduction in delivered defects
Thomson CSF                        ROI 360%
U.S. Navy                          ROI 410%
USAF Ogden Air Logistics Center    ROI 1,900%
USAF Oklahoma City Air Logistics   ROI 635%
USAF Tinker Air Force Base         ROI 600%
   Business Case for Better Software Practices

Practice                            12-month ROI   36-month ROI
Formal code inspections             250%           1,200%
Formal design inspections           350%           1,000%
Long-range technology planning      100%           1,000%
Cost and quality estimation tools   250%           1,200%
Productivity measurements           150%           600%
Process assessments                 150%           600%
Management training                 120%           550%
Technical staff training            90%            550%
   Business Case for Better Software Practices
► Performanceimprovements with the Capability
 Maturity Model (CMM)
      Business Case for Better Software Practices
►   Performance improvements with the Capability Maturity Model (CMM)
      In general for average organizations,
                   Effort = 2.94 * (KLOC)^1.10
      NASA‟s Software Engineering Laboratory‟s (SEL) effort calculation has
                   Effort = 1.27 * (KLOC)^.986
      The .986 is especially important because it means they are achieving
        a slight economy of scale.
►   COCOMO II
      Only three of the 22 factors used to calculate effort were changeable
       at the individual project management level: Level of Documentation,
       Architecture and Risk Resolution, and Development for Reuse. Most
       of these factors are at the organizational level and cannot be easily
       changed.
       Business Case for Better Software Practices
10 questions to ask about software activities
1.    How much are you spending on software development?
2.    What percentage of your projects are currently on time and on budget?
3.    What is the average schedule and budget overrun for your projects?
4.    Which of your current projects are most likely to fail outright?
5.    What percentage of your project costs arises from avoidable rework?
6.    How satisfied (quantitatively) are users of your software?
7.    How do the skills of your staff compare to the industry averages?
8.    How do the capabilities of your organization compare to similar
      organizations?
9.    How much (quantitatively) has your productivity improved in the past
      12 months?
10.   What is your plan for improving the skills of your staff and the
      effectiveness of your organization?
      Chapter 14:
 Ptolemaic Reasoning
  “All models are wrong;
 some models are useful.”
        -George Box

“Knowledge itself is power.”
      -Francis Bacon
            Ptolemaic Reasoning
► Ptolemy  was an astronomer who lived around
  A.D. 100 and theorized that the sun revolved
  around the earth.
► His theory was eventually replaced by Copernicus
  when his data showed findings that contradicted
  Ptolemy.
► In the same way, real-world data supports an
  object-oriented development process.
           Ptolemaic Reasoning
► Capability    Maturity Model
   Developed by the Software Engineering Institute.
   There are five software levels:
     ► Level   1: Initial
         Software development is chaotic. This is the default level where
          the organization generally relies on the “code-and-fix
          development” model.
     ► Level   2: Repeatable
         Basic project management practices are established on a
          project-by-project basis. The strength of the organization lies
          on its ability to repeated experiences.
           Ptolemaic Reasoning
► Capability    Maturity Model
     ► Level   3: Defined
          The organization adopts standardized technical and
           management processes across the organization. A group is
           assigned to monitor the software process.
     ► Level   4: Managed
          Project outcomes become highly predictable. A standard
           process is identified and variations can be detected.
     ► Level   5: Optimizing
          The focus of the organization is on proactive identification of
           process improvements. It has the ability to measure changes to
           the process and identify their strengths and weaknesses.
   Conway‟s Law: The structure of a computer program
    reflects the structure of the organization that built it.
         Ptolemaic Reasoning
► Navigating   the Capability Maturity Model

          1991                            2002
         Ptolemaic Reasoning
► Navigating   the Capability Maturity Model
               Ptolemaic Reasoning
►   CMM and Risk Management
     Cheyenne Mountain ATAMS project
       ► The   project team was able to…
            complete the project in 1/5th of the projected time.
            complete the project in ½ of the estimated time.
       ► Overall,they were able to deliver the software one month ahead of
         schedule and within budget.
       ► Eighteen months after release, only two defects were discovered.
►   Would developers like CMM?
     In a survey of 50 organizations, 20% of level 1 organization
      rated staff morale as “good” or “excellent”.
     At Level 2, 50% of the staff rated morale as “good” or
      “excellent”.
     At Level 3, 60% of the staff rated morale as “good” or
      “excellent”.
     Most developers working in a level 5 environment don‟t want to
      work for an organization that is less than level 5.
           Ptolemaic Reasoning
► What   does it take to implement CMM?
   Commitment from top management (and follow-
    through)
   Establishment of a Software Engineering process
    group (sometimes multiple groups).
   Appropriate training in middle management and
    various technical positions.
► What   is success?
   Success = Planning * Execution
   As an organization moves up CMM levels, they will find
    that lower levels seem valuable and less effective.
           Chapter 15:
  Quantifying Personnel Factors
“Personnel attributes and human relations
activities provide by far the largest source of
     opportunity for improving software
                 productivity.

             -Barry W. Boehm
     Quantifying Personnel Factors
►   Personnel Experience
     In a study conducted by Sackman, Eriskon, and Grant, they
      found that the variance in time-to-completion for a programming
      problem varied almost 20-to-1 among a programmers with 7+
      years of experience.
     Other studies have found similar findings ranging anywhere from
      5-to-1 to 10-to-1.
     In some cases, the programmers were unable to complete the
      problem.
     In a group of 7 random programmers, there‟s a 50/50 change
      that at least one of the programmers will produce negative
      productivity.
►   COCOMO II
     There are 7 factors that are influenced by experience:
      Application experience (1.51), Communications factors (1.53),
      Language and tool experience (1.43), Personnel continuity
      (1.51), Platform experience (1.40), Programmer capability (1.76),
      Analyst capability (2.00).
     Quantifying Personnel Factors
►   Physical Environment
     In these war-games, the environment played a factor. Of the top
      25% of programmers, most have bigger, private offices (~78 ft2)
      with fewer interruptions
►   Motivation
     Microsoft provides each group with a “morale budget” which the
      team can spend on anything from plaques, to t-shirts, to dinner
      and movies.
     Microsoft allows programmers to accommodate family situations.
►   Seniority
     Because programming experience plays such a large factor in
      development, many companies have found success in have
      senior personnel help with each project.
              Chapter 16:

Construx‟s Professional Development Program
Construx‟s Professional Development Program

► Construx‟s     Software Development objectives
   Skills enhancement
     ► Improve    the skills of the employees
   Career pathing
     ► Provides   a structured path for improvement and career choice.
   Support for common software job titles
     ► Have a full list of titles: software developers, testers, business
       analysts, project managers, architects, etc…
   Consistency
     ► Provide   a consistent means for evaluation
   Generlizability beyond Contrux
     ► Provide   a generic framework for other companies to model.
Construx‟s Professional Development Program

► Construx‟s     Knowledge Areas (SWEBOK)
     Software   Requirements
     Software   Design
     Software   Construction
     Software   Testing
     Software   Maintenance
     Software   Configuration Management
     Software   Quality
     Software   Engineering Management
     Software   Engineering Tools and Methods
     Software   Engineering Process
Construx‟s Professional Development Program

► Construx‟s    Capability Levels
   Introductory
     ► Employee can perform basic functions in an area under
      supervision. Professional development is occurring.
   Competency
     ► Employcan perform effective, independent work and serve as a
      role model for the less experienced. Occasionally mentors
   Leadership
     ► Employeeperforms exemplary work and regularly coaches
      employees and provides some leadership direction.
   Mastery
     ► Employee  can perform reference work and has deep experience.
      Usually, the employee has taught classes or written papers.
      They are recognized outside of Construx.
  Construx‟s Professional Development Program

  ► Construx‟s        Capability Levels



                                       Experience
                           Introductory Competency Leadership   Mastery
            Introductory   Introductory Competency Competency   -
Knowledge
            Competency     Competency Competency Competency     -
            Leadership     Competency Competency Leadership     Mastery
            Mastery        -           -            Mastery     Mastery
Construx‟s Professional Development Program

► Construx‟s   Professional Development Ladder
   Each engineer is giving a rating between 9-15, based on
    their knowledge and experience. A 12 is considered to
    by a full professional.
   Most engineers don‟t go beyond because it requires
    career-long commitments to the company to the
    Software Engineering field.
► Construx‟s   Culture
   Professional Development Plan, Mentoring Program,
    Professional Development Plaques, Training Program,
    Salary Structure, SE Discussion groups, Level-12
    recognition.
          Organizational Professionalism
►   Software Gold Rushes
     Gold Rush vs. Post-Gold Rush software
►   Business Case for Better Software Practices
     Process improvements and their effect on business
►   Ptolemaic Reasoning
     CMM
►   Quantifying Personnel Factors
     COCOMO II
     Environment, Motivation, etc…
►   Contrux‟s Professional Development Program
       Development objectives
       CKAs
       Capability Levels
       Ladder-based Careers
       Part Four


Industry Professionalism
           Chapter 17:
     Engineering a Profession
“Engineering can provide a life of genuine
    satisfaction in many ways, especially
through ministering in a practical manner to
    the needs and welfare of mankind.”

             -Vannevar Bush
      Engineering a Profession
► Engineeringfeats of the past
     Reims Cathedral

                            Sydney Opera House
          Engineering a Profession
►   Maturation Cycle of an Engineering Discipline
     There are 3 stages in the development of a discipline
        ► Craft
             Work is performed by talented amateurs. There is little-to-no concept of
              scalability.
        ► Commercial
             Workers are more economically driven. The focus is on quality in the
              products and production processes.
        ► Professional   Engineering
             A corresponding science is developed to better understand the engineering
              problem and this science is then applied on a wider scale to many of the
              common engineering problems of the discipline.
     As a discipline matures, solutions to common problems are codified
      (equations, models, components) so that they can be reused.
          Engineering a Profession
►   The science behind software
     Unlike Physics, the science behind the Civil Engineering that built
      the Reims Cathedral, Software Engineering doesn‟t have an exact
      science behind it.
     Software Engineering artifacts
        ► Architectures, software   design procedures
        ► Design patterns
        ► Requirements
        ► User Interface elements and procedures
        ► Estimates
        ► Planning data (project plans, procedures)
        ► Test plans, cases, data, procedures
        ► Technical review procedures
        ► Source code, construction procedures, integration   procedures
        ► Software configuration management procedures
        ► Post-project reports
        ► Organizational structures
                Chapter 18:
                Hard Knocks
“Natural abilities like natural plants, that need
   pruning by study; and studies themselves
  do give forth directions too much at large,
  except they be bounded in by experience.”

                -Francis Bacon
Hard Knocks
                    Hard Knocks
► IsComputer Science relevant to Software
  Engineering?
   Notice the decline of Computer Science and IS degrees
    from 1985-1997.
       ► The decline was due to Computer Science curriculum's becoming
        irrelevant to the workplace.
   There‟s an upsurge from 1998-2000.
       ► The Gold Rush and dot-com booms fueled a resurgence
        interested for incoming freshmen.
              Hard Knocks
► ShouldSoftware Engineering follow the same path
 as other engineering disciplines?
                      Hard Knocks
►   Academic development of Software Engineering
     The first Master‟s degree in Software Engineering was offered by
      Seattle University in 1982.
     University of Sheffield‟s Computer Science department (UK) offered
      an undergraduate Software Engineering degree in 1988.
     Rochester Institute of Technology offered the first US
      undergraduate course in 1996.
     25% of Software Engineering programs are offered in the US.
     In 2003, ~24 institutions offered an undergraduate Software
      Engineering degree.
     Should Software Engineering focus on software or engineering?
►   Accreditation
     The Computer Science accrediting board requires that their students
      make a ”scholarly contribution” to computer science, but no
      industry experience.
     ABET requires “non-academic engineering experience.”
             Chapter 19:
           Stinking Badges
“Badges? We ain‟t got no badges. We don‟t
  need no badges. I don‟t have to show you
            any stinking badges.”

            -Gold Hat Bandito,
     The Treasure of the Sierra Madre
                    Stinking Badges
► Certification
    A voluntary process culminating in an exam that is
     administered by a professional society.
    Typically, both education and experience are required.
    There are some certifications that are available.
      ► Institutefor Certification of Computing Professionals‟ Associate
        Computing Professional and Certified Computing Professional
      ► Microsoft‟s Microsoft Certified Professional
      ► Novel‟s Certified Network Engineer
      ► Oracle‟s Oracle Certified Professional
      ► Apple‟s Apple Certified Server Engineer
      ► IEEE‟s Certified Software Development Professional.
                     Stinking Badges
►   Licensing
     A mandatory legal process culminating in an exam that is
      administered by a governing agency.
     Typically, this is required to protect the public (doctors, architects,
      lawyers).
►   Can Software Engineering be licensed?
     „There is no generally agreed upon body of knowledge for software
      engineering.‟
        ► SWEBOK
     „Knowledge is software engineering changes so quickly that exams
      will be out of date by the time they‟re offered.‟
        ► Review   the contents of SWEBOK.
                    Stinking Badges
►   Can Software Engineering be licensed?
     „No reasonable test for software engineering skill could be put into a
      multiple-choice format. Indeed, no exam-based practices could
      adequately ensure competency of software engineers.‟
        ► Other complex disciplines already have exams (medicine, law, etc…).
          Why is this any different?
     „The breadth of sub-disciplines involved in software would make
      licensing all of the sub-disciplines impractical.‟
        ► The medical profession has several exams for different specialties.
          Only software development that will impact the public‟s health and/or
          welfare would need to be explicitly licensed.
     „The fundamentals of Engineering Exam required for licensing
      existing professional engineers is inappropriate for those receiving a
      computer science degree.‟
        ► Some   undergraduate degree programs focus on the engineering
          discipline, but more work would need to be done to adopt this exam.
                       Stinking Badges
►   Is licensing a bad idea?
     „Licenses would unduly restrict the number of people who could
      practice software engineering at a time when demand for software
      engineers is increasing.‟
        ► Not    all Software Engineers would be required to have a license.
     „When an engineer receives a license, it will be good for life, which
      is inappropriate considering that software engineering‟s body of
      knowledge is changing so rapidly.‟
        ► Review SWEBOK and note that other licenses help keep professionals
          up-to-date.
     „Licensing can‟t guarantee that every individual who‟s licensed will
      actually be competent. Licensing will give the public a false sense
      of security.‟
        ► Like other disciplines, only certain Software Engineers would need to be
          licensed.
                      Stinking Badges
►   More on Licensing
     Texas currently offers a “bootstrap” Professional Engineering license
      for Software Engineers.
     One side-effect of being licensed is that you‟re legally accountable
      for your work.
     Licensed engineers would have the final say on methodology
      choices.
     3 paths to general licensing
        ► Specialtyin engineering that focus on software
        ► Create a software engineering specialty exam
        ► Create a Professional Software Engineering credential.

►   Engineering students in Canada receive an iron ring to
    symbolize their commitment to society.
            Chapter 20:
       The Professional‟s Code
“Although there is a little bit of Peter Pan in
 each of us, maturity brings with it the desire
 to contribute to the communal welfare. The
     fulfillment of this yearning, I repeat,
    provides the engineer with his primary
              existential pleasure.”

            -Samuel C. Florman
        The Professional‟s Code
►A  code of ethics is required for all professions.
► Software Engineering Code of Ethics and
  Professional Practice (joint venture with ACM/IEEE)
   http://www.acm.org/serving/se/code.htm
   There are two guiding philosophies…
     ► “Software  engineers shall commit themselves to making the
       analysis, specification, design, development, testing and
       maintenance of software a beneficial and respected profession.
       In accordance with their commitment to the health, safety and
       welfare of the public, software engineers shall adhere to the
       following Eight Principles: “ (Preamble short-version)
          The Professional‟s Code
►   Software Engineering Code of Ethics and
    Professional Practice
       There are eight guiding principles…
        1. Public: Software engineers shall act consistently with the
                public interest.
        2. Client and Employer: Software engineers shall act in a manner
           that is in the best interests of their client and employer,
           consistent with the public interest.
        3. Product: Software engineers shall ensure that their products
           and related modifications meet the highest professional
           standards possible.
        4. Judgment: Software engineers shall maintain integrity and
           independence in their professional judgment.
           The Professional‟s Code
►   Software Engineering Code of Ethics and
    Professional Practice
       There are eight guiding principles…
        5. Management: Software engineering managers and leaders
           shall subscribe to and promote an ethical approach to the
           management of software development and maintenance .
        6. Profession: Software engineers shall advance the integrity and
           reputation of the profession consistent with the public interest.
        7. Colleagues: Software engineers shall be fair to and supportive
           of their colleagues.
        8. Self: Software engineers shall participate in lifelong learning
           regarding the practice of their profession and shall promote an
           ethical approach to the practice of the profession.
            The Professional‟s Code
►   Why is the Code needed?
       All professions are required to have a Code.
       Death-march projects
        ►   Developers debate unachievable schedules.
       Low-ball bidding
        ►   Developers should provide realistic estimates.
       Code-and-fix development
        ►   Inconsistent with developing quality code.
       Knowledge stagnation
        ►   Developers cannot perform professionally without keeping up-
            to-date on professional issues.
                Chapter 22:
                 Alchemy
“Q: What are the most exciting/promising software
   engineering ideas or techniques on the horizon?

A: I don‟t think that the most promising ideas are
  on the horizen. They are already here and have
    been here for years but are not being used
                      properly.”

                 -David L. Parnas
                        Alchemy
Best Practices                         Year Described
Automated estimation tools             1973
Evolutionary delivery                  1988
Measurement                            1977
Productivity environments              1984
Risk management planing                1981
Change board                           1978
Throwaway user interface prototyping   1975
JAD sessions                           1985
Information hiding                     1972
Design for change                      1979
Source code control                    1980
Incremental integration                1979
Branch-coverage testing                1979
Inspections                            1976
SEI‟s CMM                              1987
Software Engineering Process Groups    1989
                           Alchemy
►   If so many of the best-practices have been in existing for
    15+ years, why haven‟t they been implemented on a
    wide-spread scale?
       Many organizations fear changing what‟s worked previously.
       Not all best-practices work in practice.
       Many companies fear the risk involved in changing.
                              Alchemy
►   How can we diffuse information?
       The Agricultural Extension
        ►   Research Subsystem
               Research professors producing innovative results that are later
                diffused to the group.
        ►   State Extension Agents
               Connect the Research Subsystem to the County agents.
        ►   County Extension Agents
               Persons who help local farmers choose what innovations that
                should use.
        ►   SEI acts as software‟s Research Subsystem
       NASA‟s SEL producing guidebooks ad training courses.
               Industry Professionalism
►   Engineering a Profession
     What is a profession?
     Is Software Engineering a profession?
►   Hard Knocks
     History of Software Engineering
►   Stinking Badges
     Certification vs. Licensing
►   The Professional‟s Code
     Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice
►   Alchemy
     Best-practices
     Diffusing information
                              Overview
The Software Tarpit               Organizational Professionalism
   Wrestling with Dinosaurs          Software Gold Rushes
   Fool‟s Gold                       Business Case for Better Software
   Cargo Cult Software                     Practices
         Engineering                 Ptolemaic Reasoning
   Body of Knowledge                 Quantifying Personnel Factors
   Novum Organum                     Construx‟s Professional
Individual Professionalism                 Development Program
   Orphans Preferred              Industry Professionalism
   Raising Your Software             Engineering a Profession
         Consciousness               Hard Knocks
   Building the Community            Stinking Badges
   Programmer Writing                The Professional‟s Code
                                     Alchemy

								
To top