Delhi

Document Sample
Delhi Powered By Docstoc
					                  City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                        DMC(U)
        State Name                                                        DELHI
        City category                                                     Metro
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                      36.963
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  9879172
        Population (as per projection)                                  11361048
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                               18.6
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                             12.5
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             5.8
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                           Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
                                                                       Max Marks -
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and                          0.0                      0.0
                                                                           4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                           24.4
        open defecation

        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional       Max Marks -
1A_ii                                                                                  4.0          0.0         4.0
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities                4
        Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                            1.0
        of field visit points
        No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      0
                                                                       Max Marks -
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                                      4.0          2.9         1.1
                                                                           4
        Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the total
                                                                            0.4
        field visit points
        Instances of "OD" on railway track                                  4
                                                                       Max Marks -
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                                             4.0          0.0         4.0
                                                                            4
        Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                   No
        Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                     Max Marks - 6    4.0         0.0         4.0
        arrangements for human excreta
        Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                           81.7
        arrangements of human excreta
        Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                            0.0
        feacal matter observed
        Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                     Max Marks - 9    1.5         1.5         0.0
        treated and safely disposed off
        Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                           40.4
        disposed off after Secondary treatment
        Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
        black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open               3.0
        areas
        Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                     Max Marks - 3    3.0                     3.0
        reused for non potable applications
        Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                           31.9
        used (after Secondary treatment)

        Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                     Max Marks - 3    0.0         0.0         0.0
        efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
        Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                     20.2
        Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                            0.0
        more than 50% of observation points
        Whether more than 50% of the road network
        observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                          No
        flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                               Max Marks - 4    2.0         0.5         1.5
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                     75.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                     2.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                               Max Marks - 4    0.0                     0.0
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is treated
                                                                     0.0
     and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                               Max Marks - 5    5.0         4.0         1.0
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated         2.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                     0.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                               Max Marks - 4    0.0                     0.0
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                     NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                     NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                     NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                     NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                               Max Marks - 5    4.0                     4.0
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                     YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                  YES
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                   YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                   YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                           1.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in theMax Marks - 10   0.0                       0.0
     city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                   NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                   NO
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                   NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                   NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                   NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                             Max Marks - 4   2.0                       2.0
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                   NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                     YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                     YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5   2.0                   2.0
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                    YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                     30.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.7
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4   3.0                   3.0
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3   1.5                   1.5
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the        NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                   YES
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in     NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                   YES
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                   NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                               YES
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                   YES
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                YES
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                              Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
3A   Quality of drinking water                                 Max Marks - 7    5.8                     5.8
     Number of samples passing quality tests                       25.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city          Max Marks - 7    0.0                     0.0
     Number of samples passing quality tests                       0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                             Max Marks - 6    0.0                     0.0
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         4.8
years
                  City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                        N.D.M.C.
        State Name                                                         DELHI
        City category                                                  Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                       68.265
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                    302363
        Population (as per projection)                                    347717
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                                36.0
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                              19.7
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                              12.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                           Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and          Max Marks - 4    0.0                     0.0
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                           32.5
        open defecation

        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                  Max Marks - 4    3.0         0.5         2.5
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
        Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                            0.8
        of field visit points
        No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                        1

1A_iii No open defecation visible                                      Max Marks - 4    4.0         2.0         2.0
        Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the total
                                                                            0.5
        field visit points
        Instances of "OD" on railway track                                   1

1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                             Max Marks - 4    4.0         0.0         4.0

        Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                    No
        Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                     Max Marks - 6    6.0         0.0         6.0
        arrangements for human excreta
        Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                           100.0
        arrangements of human excreta
        Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                            0.0
        feacal matter observed
        Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                     Max Marks - 9    9.0         0.5         8.5
        treated and safely disposed off
        Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                           100.0
        disposed off after Secondary treatment
        Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
        black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open               1.0
        areas
        Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                     Max Marks - 3    3.0                     3.0
        reused for non potable applications
        Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                           31.9
        used (after Secondary treatment)

        Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                     Max Marks - 3    1.0         0.0         1.0
        efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
        Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                     46.5
        Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                            0.0
        more than 50% of observation points
        Whether more than 50% of the road network
        observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                          No
        flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4        4.0         0.0          4.0
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                      100.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        0.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4        0.0                      0.0
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is treated
                                                                        0.0
     and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5        5.0         0.0          5.0
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            0.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        0.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks      Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4        0.0                      0.0
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5        8.6                      8.6
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                       YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                       YES
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                   YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                   YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                           32.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in the Max Marks - 10           0.0                      0.0
     city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                    NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                    NO
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                    NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                    NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                    NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                             Max Marks - 4            4.0                      4.0
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                   YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                     YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                     YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5   2.6                   2.6
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                    YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                     80.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4   3.0                   3.0
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3   1.5                   1.5
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the        NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                   YES
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in     NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                   YES
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                   NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                               YES
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                   YES
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                YES
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                              Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
3A   Quality of drinking water                                 Max Marks - 7    6.0                     6.0
     Number of samples passing quality tests                       17.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city          Max Marks - 7    5.6                     5.6
     Number of samples passing quality tests                       4.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                             Max Marks - 6    1.0                     1.0
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         20.9
years
                  City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                      Delhi Cantt.
        State Name                                                        DELHI
        City category                                                  Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                       61.367
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                   124917
        Population (as per projection)                                   143655
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                               30.8
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                             19.4
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             11.2
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                           Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and          Max Marks - 4    0.0                     0.0
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                           19.8
        open defecation

        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                  Max Marks - 4    4.0         0.0         4.0
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
        Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                            1.0
        of field visit points
        No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                        0

1A_iii No open defecation visible                                      Max Marks - 4    4.0         3.0         1.0
        Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the total
                                                                            0.5
        field visit points
        Instances of "OD" on railway track                                   2

1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                             Max Marks - 4    4.0         0.0         4.0

        Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                    No
        Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                     Max Marks - 6    4.0         0.0         4.0
        arrangements for human excreta
        Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                           85.0
        arrangements of human excreta
        Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                            0.0
        feacal matter observed
        Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                     Max Marks - 9    9.0         0.5         8.5
        treated and safely disposed off
        Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                           100.0
        disposed off after Secondary treatment
        Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
        black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open               1.0
        areas
        Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                     Max Marks - 3    3.0                     3.0
        reused for non potable applications
        Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                           31.9
        used (after Secondary treatment)

        Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                     Max Marks - 3    3.0         0.0         3.0
        efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
        Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                     100.0
        Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                            0.0
        more than 50% of observation points
        Whether more than 50% of the road network
        observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                          No
        flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4        3.0         0.8          2.3
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       86.7
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        3.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4        0.0                      0.0
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is treated
                                                                        0.0
     and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5        5.0         4.0          1.0
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            2.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        0.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks      Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4        1.0                      1.0
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5        8.8                      8.8
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                       YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                       YES
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                   YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                   YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                           38.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in the Max Marks - 10           0.0                      0.0
     city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                    NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                    NO
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                    NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                    NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                    NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                             Max Marks - 4            4.0                      4.0
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                   YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                     YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                     YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5   2.7                   2.7
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                    YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                     80.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.9
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4   3.0                   3.0
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3   0.0                   0.0
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the        NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                   NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in     NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                   NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                   NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                               NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                   NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                              Max Marks Marks Obtained Deduction Marks Awarded
3A   Quality of drinking water                                 Max Marks - 7    7.0                     7.0
     Number of samples passing quality tests                       20.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city          Max Marks - 7    4.2                     4.2
     Number of samples passing quality tests                        3.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                             Max Marks - 6    0.0                     0.0
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         6.3
years

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:36
posted:9/29/2011
language:English
pages:12