CCTV that can automatically monitor criminal behaviour and track suspects
is being developed by UK scientists.
Researchers at Kingston University have created a system that uses
artificial intelligence to recognise specific types of behaviour, such as
someone holding a gun.
The technology is capable of following a person across multiple cameras.
Privacy campaigners warned that it might be used to target groups such as
However, the developers insisted that their invention would allow police
to focus on law breakers and erase images of innocent civilians.
The technology works by teaching a computer to recognise specific types
of public behaviour, known as "trigger events".
"In riot situations, it could be people running - a crowd might converge
in a certain place," said Dr James Orwell of Kingston University
"If somebody pulls out a gun, people tend to run in all sorts of
directions. These movements can be detected."
When an event is triggered, the software collates video footage from
before and after the incident to record a full history of the suspect's
"If a window was smashed and shop looted in a town centre street, the
technology would trace back to see who smashed the window and then
retrace his steps to see when and where he entered the town centre.
"The technology would also trace where the man had gone after leaving the
scene," said Dr Orwell.
The study is part of the ADDPRIV project - a European collaboration to
build a surveillance solution that acknowledges wider privacy concerns.
A key element of the system is the automatic deletion of surplus video
"There is a mainland European resistance to CCTV - tight controls on how
long you can keep data," explained Dr Orwell.
"This project addresses it by saying 'This is the event - let's wrap up
everything that's relevant, then delete everything else.'
"We're seeking to use surveillance to help control society, while
avoiding the Big Brother nightmare of everybody being seen all the time,"
Charles Farrier from anti-surveillance campaign group No CCTV believes
that excessive security powers would leave the system open to abuse.
"Merely saying 'We promise we won't track innocent people' isn't good
enough," said Mr Farrier.
"If you've got a state-run camera system and the state wants it triggered
on, say, peace activists, then they won't be bound by the same rules as