feminism by stariya


									                   Radical Feminism
  Women Enslaving Themselves In the Name of Liberation

                                         by Shaun Willcock

  The Bible teaches that women are equal to men as human beings, albeit with different roles to play in
the home and in society, and with different strengths. Man, having been made stronger than woman by
the Creator, has been made by Him to be the provider and the protector. To husbands the Lord
commands: “giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the
grace of life” (1 Pet. 3:7); and, “Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and
gave himself for it.... So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies” (Eph. 5:25-28). No man
should ever treat a woman with contempt, or abuse her in any way. All women should be treated with
respect and gentleness by men.
  In heathen societies untouched by Gospel influence to any great degree, for thousands of years women
were, and still are, treated with contempt, as virtual slaves, existing merely for the service and pleasure of
men, without equality before the law, possessions to be owned rather than precious human beings to be
treasured. It was, in fact, only the influence of Christianity in certain societies that elevated the status of
women, and caused men to treat them with dignity and respect. This can be seen in the gentlemanly
attitude of men to women in those western countries deeply influenced by Christianity in the past, i.e.
particularly in western Protestant countries. In such lands, women were viewed as weaker human beings,
who should be protected, and treated with courtesy and kindness. This produced the kind of manners that
once characterised men in much of western society: standing up when a woman entered the room,
opening the door for her, pulling out a chair for her, taking off or tipping one‟s hat to her, etc. And these
societies were the better for it.
  And it was also in societies and countries influenced to a large extent by Christianity, that women were
given many freedoms of which their sisters in other lands knew nothing. For in these societies men
realised that it was simply not right to treat women as second-class citizens. And so they uplifted the
status of women more and more.
  But then came the feminist movement.
  Certain women decided to become far more radical and to make unreasonable and ridiculous demands,
in a militantly aggressive fashion. And thus the radical feminist movement was born. And what many
fail to understand is that as this sinister movement promotes the view that women in Western society
have been and still are enslaved by men, and that men, and the family structure, are evils from which
women need to be emancipated, it is in fact nothing less than a branch of Marxism with the sinister
objective of destroying the very concept and structure of the family!

A Militant Agenda Against Men
 Radical feminists are anti-family by being anti-men, anti-husbands, anti-fathers, and anti-gender-roles
that have been in place since God created man and woman and that have been practiced for 6000 years.
They have a militant agenda, and in pursuit of it they want to eradicate the two-parent family. And the
reason they want to destroy it is this: “According to their Marxist view of things, the family is a
repository of gender-oppression. Men are bourgeois; women are proletariat. Such notions, however
contrived and unoriginal, took academia by storm in the 1980s and even more so in the 1990s.”1
 Radical feminism is an entire worldview: they view all aspects of life through the lens of gender. These
radicals are absurd in their theories, but deadly serious. For example, they attack true science simply
because there are (and always have been) far more men in scientific fields than women. One radical
feminist claimed that the ideas of Newton and Bacon about scientific method were a “rape manual”,
because they spoke of “penetrating” nature‟s secrets. A radical feminist named Catherine A. MacKinnon
made the astounding claim that voluntary sexual intercourse could be compared with rape, because in a
male-dominated, patriarchal, heterosexist society, the line between voluntary consent and coercion is
blurred. Radical feminists have even claimed that Beethoven composed his masterpiece, “Ode to Joy”, to
induce men into a sexual frenzy. This is the kind of “academic contribution” the world can do without,
being utterly insane; yet radical feminists take this garbage seriously, the chips on their shoulders are so
  Truly, “feminism is a secular religion with its own high priestesses, dogmas, and initiation rituals. Its
creation myth holds that on the first day Goddess created Eve, and all was right with the world. But that
idyllic state was shattered when first patriarch Adam stumbled into the Garden, pounded on the table, and
demanded his apple.”2 Yes, for these bitter and twisted women, men are the root of all evil. They
constantly harp on and on about society being “male-dominated” and “patriarchal”. They hate this, and
fight against it with all their might. And woe betide anyone who dares to disagree with them. In their
extreme, hate-filled and militant radicalism, they have been dubbed “feminazis”.

  The feminist movement has declared war on men. “All manner of unpleasant things that happen to
women are blamed on those linear-thinking, knuckle-dragging males.”3 Men, who fight wars to protect
women, who go out into the workplace and by the sweat of their brows earn money to feed their families,
are now viewed as uncouth monsters, women-oppressors, holding women back from “achieving their full
potential”, interested only in abusing women and enslaving them. “The feminist jihad”, author Carey
Roberts notes, has “indicted the entire male species for Crimes against Womankind.”4
  Their “litany of grievances”, as Roberts points out, is never-ending. For example, one of their pet
grievances is that husbands are considered the head of the family. As he humorously puts it, “Sometimes
these men are known to actually encourage their wives to stay within the credit card limit and to stay out
of cat fights. Yes, silly, that‟s what leadership is all about.” Another grievance is that men don‟t listen to
their wives. “And considering all the women who rant and rave about patriarchal oppression, maybe
they‟re not worth listening to.”5
  The fact is, the man is the head of the family. This fact is a very stubborn one – it just won‟t go away,
despite the concerted efforts of the radical feminist movement. It is clearly laid out in Holy Scripture.
“But I would have you know, that... the head of the woman is the man” (1 Cor. 11:3). “For the husband
is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing”
(Eph. 5:23,24). “Unto the woman he said... thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over
thee” (Gen. 3:16). The man has been the head of the family since the world began, by the appointment of
the Creator, and it‟s not going to change now just because some female hotheads with an axe to grind try
to overturn the biblical order and 6000 years of human history.

  And the fact is, most of the world is patriarchal. This fact, too, is a very stubborn one, and it won‟t go
away. The world is led by males. It always has been. This is in accordance with the will of God. From
the very beginning, men have been the primary breadwinners, the government-creators, the thinkers and
the muscle behind the advance of civilization. These are the facts, and facts are very stubborn things.
This is not by any means to say that women have contributed nothing, or that they are incapable of
contributing anything. There have been great women throughout history. But women in leadership
positions have always been in the minority, not because they are dumber than men (they certainly are
not), and not because they have been held back in many societies: the truth is that most women, even
today in this age of “women‟s liberation”, do not want to be in positions of great leadership. Their
ambitions lie elsewhere, for the most part, and let us be ever thankful that this is so, for in this way men
and women complement each other, just as the Lord God intended (Gen. 3:16-19). Throughout history it
has been primarily men who have governed, men who have provided, men who have led. The man is the
breadwinner and protector, the woman is the homemaker.
  This is why women do not make good soldiers. For 6000 years, men have been the soldiers. This is as
it should be. God made man to be the protector, not woman. This is not her role. She should not be
wielding a gun on the border to defend the folks back home. It‟s not her place, and she‟s not equipped by
the Creator for it. The man is. Period. She is not as physically strong, and she cannot do what a male
soldier can do. Western countries have been caving in to the militant feminist agenda, and filling
soldiers‟ barracks with women. But to do this, they have to lower the standards for women soldiers, and
in the process lower the combat capability and readiness of the army itself.
  What‟s more, most men do not want to be protected by women. It goes against the natural order of
things, the divine order, and they are intensely uncomfortable with it because deep down they know it‟s
not the way things ought to be. Speaking personally, as an African who loves to spend time in the wild
African bush, I would feel intensely uncomfortable if I was on a hike through a game park that was led
by, and under the protection of, a female game ranger with a high-powered rifle slung over her shoulder.
I simply do not want my life to be in the hands of a lady with a gun if we were to be charged by a lion or
an elephant. Nothing against ladies with firearms – I believe they should know how to defend
themselves. But I am extremely uncomfortable with the idea of standing there helplessly while a woman,
whom by upbringing and conviction I believe I should be protecting and not the other way around,
shoves me and any other hikers behind her for protection as she prepares to do battle with whatever
dangerous animal erupts from the bush. Call me old-fashioned, but some things just ought not to be.
And if they were honest and their feminist womenfolk gave them permission to say what they really felt,
most men would agree with me.

 As Carey Roberts put it, again with some humour: “Men provided the raw muscle power and ingenuity
that became the engine for a booming economy. Patriarchs, also known as primary breadwinners,
provided sustenance and stability to their families. And male leadership enabled our country [this is said
of the USA, but true of many other western, Protestant-influenced countries as well] to prevail through
two World Wars and the Great Depression. These events left an indelible mark on the men who pulled
us through those terrible times. These brave souls can be forgiven if they sometimes burp without
covering their mouth or find it hard to talk about their feelings.”6 Precisely. Feminists may want men to
be more feminine (and I‟ll have more to say about that a little later), to “get in touch with their feminine
side” (as if they have one), and to have better manners; but men are men and women are women, and in
many ways “ne‟er the twain shall meet”.
 For the fact is, men and women are different. Another stubborn fact that just won‟t go away, no matter
how hard the feminists try. The sexes are not the same. Men excel in some fields, women in others.
Women can conceive and give birth to babies. Men cannot do this. Women love to claim that they can
do two or more things at once, which men can‟t. Perhaps they‟re right about this. If they are, this is
another area where women and men are not the same. And this is good. The Lord did not make them the
 When the Lord created woman, He provided man with a lovely creature who would teach man, by her
very presence no less than by her words, to give thought to such things as manners, kindness, gentleness,
consideration for others, etc. As such, she has been an immense blessing to man. But to feminise men?
To turn them into carbon copies of women? Their roles on this earth are different. Men are designed by
the Creator to be masculine, rougher around the edges, tougher than women. The old children‟s verse
has a lot of truth in it: “What are little boys made of? Snakes and snails and puppy dogs‟ tails. And
what are little girls made of? Sugar and spice and all things nice.” True, both men and women are
depraved sinners; but in their general deportment and conduct women have generally been softer, gentler.
And this is how it should be. This is of the Lord.

 Let us consider the effects of radical feminism on women; on men; and on boys.

The Effects of Radical Feminism on Women
 Although women‟s libbers think they‟re now “free”, in truth the very opposite is the case: they are in
fact enslaved to feminism itself. And it is a hard taskmaster indeed. Consider the facts:
 Has feminism actually helped women? Truly helped them? Have their lives been made better? Many
would argue that it has – they can now go into the workplace, and do virtually any job a man can do; etc.,
etc. But in reality, are women‟s lives truly better, as regards quality of life? The answer is a decided No.
In the words of Nancy Levant, author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women, “why are
American women, whose culture and males allowed them to have freedom from gender bondage, so
incredibly stupid with their freedom?”7 She is right, and it‟s true not only of American women. Yes,
women are now free – but in what ways? Just think about the so-called “freedoms” western women now
 Levant writes: “We are free to take vanity to bizarre standards and measures – those created by the
beauty, health, and media industries – that mandate skeletal thinness, life-long photo-youth looks,
tanning bed skin color, Botox shots in the face, fake breasts, fake fingernails”. Is this true freedom?
Surely not. Women are not free, they are now enslaved to the fashion industry.
  “We are also free,” writes Levant, “to become useless in our homes. We now hire maid services,
landscapers, pool cleaners, painters, interior decorators, cooks, nannies, teachers and tutors, caterers,
therapists, party planners, massage therapists, laundry services, etc., while losing every intuitive instinct
of our female natures.” Supposedly “liberated” women now hire people to do all the things every woman
once did for herself in her own home – and very competently, too. And now, having nothing to do
except join their men in the rat-race of the workplace or mooch around bored in their own homes because
all domestic duties are taken care of by others, they turn to extra-marital affairs and increasingly bizarre
behaviour. Is this true freedom? No – they are enslaved to the workplace, and yet think they are free to
“pursue their careers”. Millions of men have always bemoaned the drudgery of having to go out and earn
their bread in the sweat of their brows, in accordance with the curse of the Lord God upon man when he
sinned (Gen. 3:17-19); and now women are joining them in that difficult existence. Desiring to escape
the curse upon the woman (Gen. 3:16), the daughters of Eve have mistakenly thought that the curse upon
the man was somehow a lighter one to bear. They are learning, to their cost, that it is not so. They have
lost the art of homemaking as they have rushed to voluntarily place themselves under the man‟s curse.
How foolish and how heartbreakingly tragic.
  This is not to say that women must never work! Throughout history, all around the world, women have
worked, sometimes because they wanted to and often because they had to. There is nothing wrong with
this. The Bible contains examples of women who worked at secular employment. But first and
foremost, a woman is called to be a homemaker and a homekeeper. If she works because she wants to,
and yet is a wife and mother, her first and foremost duty is to her husband, her children, and her home.
So many of today‟s “liberated” women, however, don‟t know how to take care of a home, raise their
children, or create the kind of environment that a husband would love to come home to. They pursue
their careers at the expense of their families, enchaining themselves to their work desks as if their jobs
are the reason for their existence; as if they are somehow incomplete as human beings unless they can
“show everyone that they can do anything a man can do.” What a waste.

 Women are now “free” to have multiple male sexual partners. Feminism promoted the idea that women
don‟t need men to be complete – so large numbers of women made their careers their everything, not
marriage. Nowadays they are referring to “arrangements” with men rather than relationships. “Steering
clear of what they define as „sticky, mushy relationships‟ these girls prefer to schedule their men in when
they have time to see them!”8
 They are now “free” to prevent pregnancies by popping abortifacient pills, or, if they happen to fall
pregnant, they are now “free” to jettison the human results of their promiscuity via abortion. Society is
now full of women secretly carrying the terrible guilt for what they have done to their unborn children.
Pro-abortion doctors try to convince everyone that abortion is not murder, but deep down most people
know that it is. If not before the abortion, then often afterwards.
 Not all have abortions, of course; but because they mock the institution of marriage, and sleep around
with multiple partners, they usually end up having children out of wedlock – children all too often
unwanted and unloved. So, after a long day‟s work at the office, these women return home to a house
without a man, but a house in which there are children they can hardly handle because they never really
see them. They are being raised by others. All this leads to stress, and utter exhaustion for women, and
of course is devastating to the children. They grow up without fathers, in State-controlled educational
centres, being indoctrinated into the new world order.
 As Levant puts it: “We are free to have extra-marital affairs, multiple lovers, to abort children... to use
men like ATMs... and to take thousands upon thousands of family dollars for personal use in our
missions to look like (and act like) teenagers.
  “We are free to have children with as many men as we choose, and to bankrupt multiple men with
mandatory child support payments. We are then free to ignore children by paying far more attention to
maid-cleaned, spotless, and magazine-cover homes, where no cooking is achieved, no family memories
are created, and no shoes are allowed to be worn on the white carpets.... We are free to give our children
computer software to keep them addictively occupied for YEARS, and then complain about their lack of
social skills.
  “We are free to completely ignore the FACT that our children are SUFFERING with mean-spirited and
incompetent mothers – children who are hungry, starved for attention, and mistreated by non-stop
extracurricular sports regimens, drive-thru bags of dangerous food, teachers and public school
indoctrination camps, completely ignored spiritual needs, and disrespect and contempt of their children‟s
  Summarising all this, she states: “So another question begs – what does liberation mean to American
women? [and not just American women! – S.W.]. Does it mean the freedom to vote? Freedom from
historical gender bondage? Freedom from ownership? I don‟t think so. Today‟s American female is
free to be an idiot – a shallow, self-involved, pathologically vain, completely incompetent, and angry
person – angry to the tune of making the anti-depressant industry the largest profit maker, bar none, for
big pharma. Stupid is what stupid does.”9 Exactly.

  I would add another question: why is it that these things are discerned by the journalists and writers
quoted here, but not by so many professing Christian women (and men)? It seems that professing
“Christians” are so caught up in making money, having fun, and living selfishly, that they are blind to the
terrible reality that‟s staring them in the face every time they return home to their children. They are just
so busy: busy going to the beauty salon, busy soaking up the soapies on TV, busy making money. Are
these the fruits of true salvation?

  There is no true freedom without freedom to dissent. And you can‟t disagree with these feminazis!
They are arrogant, rude, crude, militantly organised, and they expect every woman – and man – on the
planet to agree with them and support their cause and agenda. And those who don‟t are insulted,
sometimes assaulted, shouted down, ridiculed, and ostracised. Thus women, who naively think they have
been “liberated” from “slavery” to men, have in fact been enslaved by the very movement that claims to
have liberated them! They are not free to differ with these radical fanatics. They must go along with the
agenda – or else.
  In another article Nancy Levant writes: “I suggest to you that the „liberation‟ you [i.e. women] have
achieved through the misguidance of the feminist movement is false. I suggest that Westernized women
are often miserable, overworked, and suffering due to separation from their children. Think of it this way
– the feminist movement actually believed they could change the fundamental meaning and purpose of
womanhood, biological and instinctual gendering, and that they could culturally remove children from
mothers, and call it „liberation.‟ You are equally liberated to destroy any children that you don‟t want.
Wow. I guess that means that you have a great deal of power. Congratulations. It is far greater to be a
drugged laborer than a mother. Let us thank the feminist movement for making this clear to us dim-
witted females.”10
  This is not liberation, it‟s bondage! It‟s bondage to the movement itself, bondage to the drudgery of the
workplace, and most of all, bondage to sin. But they don‟t see it. They think they‟re free! “I‟m free to
do as I please with my body.” “I‟m free to go to work, earn my own money, live as I like.” “I‟m free to
live with any man I like, marry and divorce as I please.” “I‟m free to abort my baby, or hand him over to
the State to raise in the State‟s image.”

The Effects of Radical Feminism on Men
 The feminisation of society is having a hugely negative impact on men. It has turned men into
effeminate weaklings! They are not allowed to be truly masculine, as such masculinity is seen to be
“assertiveness” over women; they are not even allowed to have the manners of earlier generations of
“gentlemen”, as this is seen as condescending to women. And thus we have this new, feminised,
androgynous creature called the “metrosexual”, who shaves off his chest hair and is supposedly “in touch
with his feminine side”. Even paints his toe nails at times.
 A man cannot be allowed to be masculine anymore; yet “liberated” women, supposedly as tough as
men, their attitude being “I can do anything a man can do”, are now supposed to demonstrate masculine
qualities! Truly, it‟s an upside-down world.
 There are of course many reasons for the breakdown of the institution of marriage in society today, but
this is certainly one of them: feminism has made men shy away from the commitment of marriage, or
even from the very attempt to find a woman to marry; for if a man shows any interest whatsoever in a
woman, she is liable to slap him with a “sexual harassment” lawsuit even for the most innocent of
conversations, and this will ruin his life – even if he‟s eventually found innocent. Then too, there is the
fear of getting married, and then at some point having the wife take the husband to the divorce court over
some small matter and being so favoured by the women-friendly judicial system that the financial
settlement of the courts leaves him with next to nothing. Women are now using their new-found
favouritism in the courts to their advantage, making life utterly miserable for their men while knowing
that the men cannot do anything about it, or they will be in trouble with the law. Women openly admit to
using emotional blackmail to get their way, knowing that the law is all on the woman‟s side and men are
increasingly too afraid to do anything about it. They demand equal rights, but do not want to have equal
responsibilities. Instead, whenever anything goes wrong, it can conveniently be blamed on the man; and
courts are supporting this. Women are seen as “victims” who have done no wrong; it‟s all the man‟s
As one South African man put it: “Women feel superior to us men because of the rights that have been
given to them and they often misinterpret their rights to mean that they have the right to do anything and
men should not oppose them.”11
 And thus the God-created order has been overturned: women are now in charge, and men have been
turned into their obedient, apologetic servants. And in the process, the God-ordained institution of
marriage has been cast aside. Even in many marriage vows nowadays, the woman no longer promises to
“obey” her husband. This is seen as old-fashioned and oppressive. And so-called “churches” are content
to buckle to society‟s pressures and go along with this!

 And yet the irony is, astoundingly, that even though the feminist movement is so rabidly anti-male, all
the freedoms and privileges women presently enjoy in society were granted to them by men! Just ponder
this fact for a minute. Women did not win these things by their own efforts. They did not stage a
revolution or fight a war against men to gain them. They are not physically strong enough to win a war
against men, or for that matter to force men to do anything. Feminists can jubilantly and triumphantly
scream and shout all they like about “girl power” and “sisters doin‟ it for themselves”, but it‟s all
hogwash. They did not beat men into submission and force them to grant them their present freedoms
and equality. Men decided to give them these things. If men had not voluntarily decided to do so,
women would not be able to enjoy a single one of them. That‟s a fact. And yet feminists hate men, they
hate the very ones who voluntarily gave women all the freedoms they presently enjoy in western society!
Freedoms, let it be said, which are utterly unknown to women in many other societies of the world.
These bitter radical feminists have been very successful in convincing society that they are “persecuted”
and “discriminated against” and all the rest, in this “male-dominated, patriarchal” society. Well, it might
have been such a society once (and the world was a better one for it), but it certainly isn‟t so today: in
almost every sphere in western society today, men are in retreat, and women are being favoured,
promoted, advantaged. But instead of gratitude to western men who turned the tables in their favour,
they are bitter, angry, and vindictive.
 Women in the west have more “rights”, more freedoms, than any other women in the world, past or
present – and yet still these female fanatics whine and complain and demand more and still more. If they
want to know what real oppression and drudgery and suffering is, they should live for a while in a Middle
Eastern society, or in certain African or Asian societies. But no – they would rather stay in their
comfortable western lands, with all their freedoms and conveniences, and whine about being “oppressed”
and “held back” in their “male-dominated, patriarchal” society. The very same “male-dominated,
patriarchal” society, let it be noted, that has provided them with the highest standard of living, and the
greatest freedoms, that any society anywhere in the world has ever enjoyed since the world began.
The Effects of Radical Feminism on Boys
 What about the effects of feminism on boys? The feminisation of men starts with the feminisation of
young boys. This has been well-put in an article by Carey Roberts. Ponder his words:
 “Forty years ago the National Organization for Women was founded. That marked the beginning of an
unholy jihad to deconstruct masculinity. Now, a low-level hostility to all things macho pervades our
  “A toddler is warned that pointing his finger in the shape of a gun will earn him 10 minutes of time-out.
No dump trucks or military figures sully the serenity of his play area. „Go play with your Ken-and-
Barbie set,‟ his gender-enlightened parents console him.
  “Want to come out and play Cops and Robbers? Forget it, little boy!...
  “During the Saturday morning cartoons, he‟ll marvel at Wonder Woman and Firestar who easily
vanquish their male assailants...
  “At school, junior is informed that tag was banned because it promotes competition and aggressiveness,
and recess may be coming next.
  “In history class he learns memorable facts such as the West was won by brave teenage girls,
Sacagawea led the Lewis and Clark expedition, and Mary Todd Lincoln endured great hardships during
the Civil War.
  “If our aspiring man wants to play high school sports, he may be enlightened, „Sorry, but not enough
girls signed up for field hockey this year.‟ If he mentions the sex bias of Take Your Daughter to Work
Day, the female principal is likely to take him aside and warn him those remarks are creating a hostile
environment for the girls.”12
  Larry Pratt, director of Gun Owners of America, said: “One reason so many feminists are such angry
sourpusses is that God made boys and girls different, and while feminist meddling can have a negative
impact, it cannot rewire what the Creator has made. For example, it really enrages these angry gals when
boys are given dolls to play with and they turn around and use the doll‟s arm as a gun „Bang!‟
Conversely, girls take that Tonka Truck and make a crib for their baby doll in the bed of the truck.
Aaaargh! Normal people (non-feminists) tend to react to these ingrained behavior patterns with a
„Duh!‟” 13
  Yes, boys and girls are different. The Lord has made them different, and He has done so for a reason.
From childhood already, these differences become very readily apparent. But thanks to the feminist
movement, little boys are now being turned into effeminate creatures. They are growing up to believe
that girls and women rule the world – and moreover that this is how it should be. They are being taught
that males have brought nothing but misery to the world, that the true history of females has been
suppressed but is at last coming to the fore as the history books are being rewritten, and that the role of
boys and men in society is to live in perpetual guilt for being males. Society is being re-programmed in
the image of Woman.

 It is vitally important for Christian parents to fight back against this radical feminisation of society.
They need to teach their boys to be boys, and their girls to be girls. They must teach their boys to be
masculine and their girls to be feminine. They must teach them about the God-ordained roles of men and
 Remember the days when boys used to take risks, play cops and robbers, play hunters in the woods,
shoot pellet guns, go fishing, and come home with their knees scraped and all covered in dirt? This is
what little boys are made of! And it‟s all excellent training for adult life. Now look around you: where
are such boys today? They‟re sitting inside with their eyes glued to the TV or to dumb computer games,
their brains in neutral, and if they go outside at all they are first kitted out with more protective wear than
a soldier going to war.

The Destruction of the Family in Accordance with Marxist Objectives
 So: what has feminism achieved?
 It has destroyed the concept of different roles for each member of the family, based on biblical truth.
The husband is no longer seen as the head of the home – the pushy, bossy woman is in charge, the
effeminate husband has no backbone, and the children are out of control, disrespectful, lazy,
undisciplined, with no sense of responsibility and a huge sense of entitlement. And that‟s in the homes
where a husband still exists. Feminism, quite simply, has destroyed the family. It has achieved what it
set out to do. And most women and men are so conditioned, so brainwashed by their television sets, that
they don‟t even know what has happened, or why.
 And all of this plays into the hands of the Communistic one-worlders behind the scenes. For in their
ceaseless quest for a Marxist world, they know that the family unit must be wiped out. They want to
destroy the family, they want children to grow up without that God-ordained support structure, and in a
State-controlled educational facility, and they want people to grow old all alone, without the loving
companionship of a spouse or the care of their children – so that they can be more easily manipulated and
controlled! It‟s all about people control. It is Marxism at work. And it is working extremely well.
 This was admitted by someone in the Rockefeller clan, which is a major player amongst those seeking
to create a one-world government. When Aaron Russo, author of America: Freedom to Fascism, spoke
in support of the women‟s movement to this person, the reply was: “We...created the women‟s
movement, and we promote it. And it‟s not about equal opportunity. It‟s designed to get both parents
out of the home and into the workforce, where they will pay taxes. And then we can decide how the
children will be raised and educated.” 14
 Another vital part of the one-worlders‟ plan is population control. And this explains their fanatical
support for abortion the world over. This is why the feminist movement is so intent upon promoting
abortion worldwide, under the guise of “a woman‟s right to do as she pleases with her own body”.
Calling it “Planned Parenthood” is a cover. If they were honest, it would be called “Planned Population
 Foolish western women who blithely, and blindly follow the utterances of the high priestesses of the
feminist movement are nothing but useful idiots for the one-worlder‟s cause! “If American women [and
indeed, western women in general! – S.W.] weren‟t so glued to their mirrors, anti-depressants, angers,
and ill health due to life-long diets, they might realize that massive population reduction, and its
connection to global politics and the pharmaceutical and „health‟ industries, is MANDATED. The
feminist movement has been pushing depopulation under the guises of „women‟s rights‟ for decades.
Now, ladies, it‟s not so much of a stretch to understand the connection between abortion „rights,‟
reproductive legislation, and the mental health movement, which specifically targets women and
children, to realize that other „agendas‟ are afoot and off and running. When you are talking about
massive global population reduction, you are, in fact, talking about the control of women, their bodies,
their unalienable and biological rights to pregnancies and babies, and marriage.”15
 All this drove Levant to write: “And to the world‟s feminists – I say this: You are the dumbest women
who have ever walked on the face of the Earth. Week by week, day by day, you are losing every right
you thought you invented. You fell hook, line, and sinker into the dialectic, and you are nothing but
dictator pawns to the larger mission of total control over people and freedom. What a shame when
arrogance literally beats brains useless. What a crime and a shame when you brutally victimize the very
people you claim to represent – much like all other destroyers of human freedom.”16

  Yes, the irony of it all is that the feminist movement, while purporting to be all about freeing women
from “bondage” to men, has in fact brought women into bondage to the feminist movement, which is
itself nothing but a puppet of the advocates of global people-control. Women have become slaves, in the
name of freedom! The plan has been diabolically clever: keep women (and men) so engrossed in
themselves, and in entertainment, that they don‟t see what is happening to themselves and their families;
fill their every waking moment with careers, and beauty treatments, and entertainment, so that they have
no time in the day to truly think and are too exhausted at night to be able to read and think and see
through the smokescreen; keep them so busy, tired and unhappy that they feel they can‟t cope and must
attend “therapy” sessions with some so-called “expert”, who‟s really as mixed-up and confused as they
are but who has the authority to dope them up with medication that perpetuates their zombie-like state
and thus keeps them from ever thinking for themselves, or reading for themselves, and thus figuring out
what‟s actually going on. Keep their children away from them as much as possible, via State educational
facilities and after-care facilities, and hours of homework, and sports, and hours of TV and musical
entertainment, so that although they pass each other in the same house, parents and children are really
leading separate lives and are essentially strangers to each other.
  And to top it all, call all this “women‟s liberation”, the freedom to do as she pleases, to live her life the
way she wants to!

 Radical feminism is rebellion, plain and simple. Rebellion against the God-given order. It is a rebellion
that is destroying western society. And it is a trap into which even professing Christians are liable to fall,
if they are not on their guard. The crying need of the times is for Christians to be well taught about what
the Word of God says about the roles of husbands, wives, and children, and to put it into practice; to
understand what true womanhood and true manhood is all about. Remember the commandment of Holy
Scripture: “Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil” (Exod. 23:2). Go against the grain! Swim
against the tide! Let your own life, and your family structure, be a reflection of the biblical pattern! “Be
not conformed to this world” (Rom. 12:2)!
  Human nature being what it is, we just never get the right balance. Not wanting women to be the virtual
slaves they are in various Middle Eastern countries, western society has swung the pendulum so far in the
other direction that “freedom” for women means licence to live lower than animals if they want. Which
would we rather have? Women as virtual slaves, or women fornicating, aborting their children, and
using their acquired power to grind men underfoot? Frankly, I don‟t want either extreme. The
unregenerate are destined to always swing from one extreme to the other. Only in Christ is the right
balance set out, and maintained: the husband as the head of the home, the provider and protector; the wife
as the homemaker; the children in their proper place, under parental care and guidance until they are
adults. This alone is the God-ordained pattern, and the only key to true and lasting happiness.

Shaun Willcock is a minister of the Gospel. He lives in South Africa and runs Bible Based Ministries.
For other pamphlets (which may be downloaded and printed), as well as details about his books, audio
messages, news articles, etc., please visit the Bible Based Ministries website, or write to the address
below. If you would like to be on Bible Based Ministries‟ electronic mailing list, please send your

                                  Bible Based Ministries

                  This pamphlet may be copied for free distribution if it is copied in full

                      Contending for the Faith Ministries
                                  (Distributor for Bible Based Ministries)
                                           42055 Crestland Drive
                                            Lancaster, CA 93536
                                          United States of America


1.Radical Feminists: Useful Idiots, by Steven Yates, August 1, 2006. NewsWithViews.com.
2.Blame It On the Patriarchy, by Carey Roberts, August 12, 2006. NewsWithViews.com.
3.Winner of the Coveted 2006 Award for Political Incorrectness, by Carey Roberts, December 31, 2006.
4.Blame It On the Patriarchy.
5.Blame It On the Patriarchy.
6.Blame It On the Patriarchy.
7.The Cultural Devastation of American Women, by Nancy Levant, August 22, 2006.
8.Weekend Witness, August 12, 2006.
9.The Cultural Devastation of American Women.
10.Feminism and the Control of Womanhood, by Nancy Levant, January 9, 2007. NewsWithViews.com.
11.Echo [Witness supplement], August 10, 2006.
12.With Feminized Men, Who Will Fight the War on Terror? by Carey Roberts, August 26, 2006.
13.Feminism’s Assault on Self Defense, by Larry Pratt, January 19, 2007. NewsWithViews.com.
14.Radical Feminists: Useful Idiots.
15.Female Hypocrisy, a Feminist Condition, by Nancy Levant, September 5, 2006.
16.Feminism and the Control of Womanhood.


To top