Higher Education and the Skills Agenda
Professor Deian Hopkin
Chair, UniversitiesUK Skills Task Force Joint Chair, HE Engagement Board (DCFS/DIUS)
Aim Higher Conference, Sunderland
6 March 2008
CONTEXTS
20 YEARS OF SKILLS REFORM
• • • • • • • • 1988 1990 1992 1994 1997 1998 1999 2001 Enterprise in Higher Education Investors in People FE and HE Act Modern Apprenticeships New Deal for Young People Learning Accounts – UFI Learning and Skills Councils Cabinet Office Workforce Development Project Skills for Business Network – SSDA and SSC “Success for All “ COVEs. Launch of Skills Strategy Foster Review 14-19 White Paper Skills Strategy White Paper Leitch Review of Skills Further Education Act
• • • •
2002 2003 2004 2005
• 2006
SOME RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Degrees of Skill: Student Employability Profiles A Guide for Employers
UK Population 2006
18 year old cohort in 2020
National Statistics, 2007
Participation of 16-18 year olds in education and training
NEET
DFES 2006
The declining 18 year old cohort
2100.0 2050.0
2000.0
Thousands
1950.0
1900.0
1850.0
1800.0
1750.0
20 06 20 07 07 20 -08 08 20 -09 09 20 10 10 20 -11 11 20 -12 12 20 13 13 20 -14 14 20 -15 15 20 16 16 20 -17 17 20 -18 18 20 19 19 20 -20 20 20 -21 21 20 22 22 20 -23 23 20 -24 24 20 25 25 20 -26 26 20 -27 27 20 28 28 -2 9
Source: HEPI, Demand for Higher Education to 2020 and beyond (2007); ONS and Government Actuary's Department (2005 based projections, published in August 2006), adjusted by DfES for academic years.
The alternative demographic scenario
PROJECTED CHANGE IN AGE GROUPS 2004-2020
Government Actuary’s Department
Age and Distribution of Qualifications
Leitch Review of Skills
Key Facts
• 70% of the 2020 workforce are already beyond school-leaving age. • Only 63% of 16-17 year olds in full time education; 37% in work or in NEET • 50% of those in full time education studying level 3; but 50% below level 3. • Only 32% of 15-year olds expect to go on to university- the lowest in the OECD
DEMAND AND SUPPLY
The skills demand
Qualifications profiles across the UK, 2004
Leitch Review of Skills
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
100
150
200
250
300
50
Who goes to 2004 university? UCAS Profile (Total Base)
0
Mosaic Type / Group
- Higher Age Profile
Alex Singleton, University College London: www.spatial-literacy.org
Rural Isolation Grey Perspectives Tw ilight Subsistence
Global Connections Cultural Leadership Corporate Chieftains Golden Empty Nesters Provincial Privilege High Technologists Semi-Rural Seclusion Just Moving In Fledgling Nurseries Upscale New Owners Families Making Good Middle Rung Families Burdened Optimists In Military Quarters Close to Retirement Conservative Values Small Time Business Sprawling Subtopia Original Suburbs Asian Enterprise Respectable Rows Affluent Blue Collar Industrial Grit Coronation Street Town Centre Refuge South Asian Industry Settled Minorities Counter Cultural Mix City Adventurers New Urban Colonists Caring Professionals Dinky Developments Town Gown Transition University Challenge Bedsit Beneficiaries Metro Multiculture Upper Floor Families Tower Block Living Dignified Dependency Sharing a Staircase Families on Benefits Low Horizons Ex-industrial Legacy Rustbelt Resilience Older Right to Buy White Van Culture New Town Materialism Old People in Flats Low Income Elderly Cared for Pensioners Sepia Memories Childfree Serenity High Spending Elders Bungalow Retirement Small Town Seniors Tourist Attendants Summer Playgrounds Greenbelt Guardians Parochial Villagers Pastoral Symphony Upland Hill Farmers
Key Widening Participation Groups
Happy Families
Urban Intelligence
Ties of Community
Suburban Comfort
Welfare Borderline
Symbols of Success
Blue Collar Enterprise
Municipal Dependency
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
Average Distance from applicant home to accepting institution (2004)
Average Distance Travelled to University 2004 (All Home Acceptances)
Mosaic Type / Group
Key WP groups
Alex Singleton, University College London: www.spatial-literacy.org
Rural Isolation Happy Families Urban Intelligence Ties of Community Suburban Comfort Grey Perspectives Welfare Borderline Symbols of Success Tw ilight Subsistence Blue Collar Enterprise Municipal Dependency
Global Connections Cultural Leadership Corporate Chieftains Golden Empty Nesters Provincial Privilege High Technologists Semi-Rural Seclusion Just Moving In Fledgling Nurseries Upscale New Owners Families Making Good Middle Rung Families Burdened Optimists In Military Quarters Close to Retirement Conservative Values Small Time Business Sprawling Subtopia Original Suburbs Asian Enterprise Respectable Rows Affluent Blue Collar Industrial Grit Coronation Street Town Centre Refuge South Asian Industry Settled Minorities Counter Cultural Mix City Adventurers New Urban Colonists Caring Professionals Dinky Developments Town Gown Transition University Challenge Bedsit Beneficiaries Metro Multiculture Upper Floor Families Tower Block Living Dignified Dependency Sharing a Staircase Families on Benefits Low Horizons Ex-industrial Legacy Rustbelt Resilience Older Right to Buy White Van Culture New Town Materialism Old People in Flats Low Income Elderly Cared for Pensioners Sepia Memories Childfree Serenity High Spending Elders Bungalow Retirement Small Town Seniors Tourist Attendants Summer Playgrounds Greenbelt Guardians Parochial Villagers Pastoral Symphony Upland Hill Farmers
Graduation rates of 20-21 year olds OECD comparisons 2005
Australia Iceland New Zealand Finland Denmark Poland Netherlands Norway Italy United Kingdom OECD AVERAGE 59% 56% 51% 47% 46% 45% 42% 41% 41% 39% 36%
The growth in demand
5 yr Total TfL Resource Demand - Rail
includes LUL (PPP's and PFI's), London Rail & DLR - excludes Crossrail
7000 6000
Saf ety & Security Engineering Assurance Engineering Premises Engineering Fire Engineering**
Nos of People (FTE)
5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10
Systems Engineering** E & M Engineering** Communications Engineering Pow er Engineering** Signals Engineering** Rolling Stock Engineering** Civils & Structures Engineering Track Engineering** Commercial Management Project Management
TRANSPORT FOR LONDON – POTENTIAL SKILLS SHORTAGES
Streets, Surface Congestion Charging and Major Projects
• • • • • • Traffic Signalling Engineers CCTV Engineers Communication engineers Certain types of IT engineers Traffic engineering skills in general Project Managers/ Engineering Project Managers Network Assessment Engineers Environmental teams Transport Planning and modelling Behavioural response modelling Revenue and timetable modelling Land use planning Case management skills associated with TWA bills etc
London Underground, Crossrail and Major Projects
• Specialist Tunnelling Resource • Permanent Way Engineers • Project Managers/ Engineering Project Managers • Signalling Engineers • Line Upgrade Engineers • Communication Engineers • Power Engineers • Rolling Stock Engineers • Systems Engineers • Fire Engineers • M&E Engineers • Specialist Tramway engineering and operations resource
• • • • • • •
Chartered Engineers – Age Profile 1988-2005
30000
25000
20000
Over 60
1988 2004
15000
10000
5000
0
21-2 4 24-2 9 30-3 4 35-3 9 40-4 4 45-4 9 50-5 4 55-5 9 60-6 4 65-6 9 70-7 4 75-7 9 80-8 4 85-8 9 90+
Percentage change in enrolments by subject area, 1996/7 to 2005/06
Foundation Degrees available 2005/6
Law Retail History etc Performing Arts Media Sport Hospitality/Tourism Health Art/Design Computing Business Education
11 20 22 120 127 153 156 218 222 294 330 336 0 100 200 300 400 No of courses
Source: FDF 2006
MEETING THE DEMAND
What are HEIs already doing?
• 90% offer tailor-made courses for business on their campuses • 80% offer education on companies’ premises • 78% report that employers are actively engaged in the development of the curriculum • Nearly all HEIs have a dedicated enquiry point for business • And yet…. Only 2% of business in recent survey said they rate universities as an important source of information
What are employers looking for?
GCSE A/C
A level
Degree
Special skills
Quality
Fluency (Eng)
B/Literacy
Employability
0
20
40
60
80
100
London Skills and Employment Board, 2007
A different kind of learner?
Gateway Applications for 2009
Applications have been made by 357 Consortia, for 1020 lines, and covering 141 Local Authorities .
2406 Secondary schools 61 Academies 277 special schools + 7 non-maintained special schools 4 independent schools 332 colleges 108 Universities
3332 discrete institutions are partners in at least one consortium from G1 or G2, of which 2502 are secondary schools.
Gateway Applications for 2009
Regional Distribution
Region No of LAs
Number of consortia applying
Eastern England East Midlands
London
(9 LAs) (8 LAs)
(31 LAs)
39* 32
36
North East
North West
(12 LAs)
(22 LAs)
26
37
South East
South West West Midlands Yorkshire and Humberside
(16 LAs)
(14 LAs) (14 LAs)
61
37 56
(15 LAs) (141 LAs)
33 357
TOTAL
learner numbers
Gateway Applications for 2009
No of students by level
L1 Pre16 L1 L2 Post- Pre16 16 L2 L3 Post- Pre16 16 L3 Post16 Total
TOTAL 23830 7001
29678 13256 1876 20444 96085
Gateway Applications for 2009
Number of applications per Diploma line
Diploma Line Applications
Construction and the Built Environment
Creative and Media Engineering Information Technology
69
96 54 90
Society, Health and Development Business Administration and Finance Hair and Beauty Studies
Hospitality Environmental and Land Based Studies
100 165 151
142 111
Manufacturing and Product Design
42 1020
Higher Education and the Diplomas
Current FE-HE partnership work
• • • • • • • • Lifelong Learning Partnerships Aim Higher Foundation Degrees Train to Gain Plan for Growth 14-19 Diploma Consortia LSC-HEFCE Complementary Investment Decisions Work on credit transfer and progression LSC Higher Education Strategy (2006) and DIUS Higher Education Strategy (2008) • New Standard for Employer Responsiveness.
The HE Engagement Board
Universities, schools and Colleges
Ministers
UCAS QAA
Foundation Degree Forward
QCA
DFES officers
Joint Chairs And DFES secretariat
UVAC
Specialist advisers
UUK
Higher Education Academy
Employers and SSCs
GuildHE
Mission Groups
Students and parents
The conclusions of the 1994 report
• Strong enthusiasm for the Extended project • Doubts about the introduction of A* grade • 62% of admissions tutors in relevant undergraduate areas felt it was very likely, quite likely or possible that they would be admitting Advanced Diploma students to undergraduate courses from 2010. • All 19 universities committed • Among 1994 Group universities working closely with 14- 19 projects in their own localities are Lancaster, Loughborough and York
CHALLENGES FOR HE and FE
Projections of demand for HE
HEPI 2005
Projections of demand for HE
The Links in the Chain
• Improved Advice and Guidance • Raise aspirations e.g. Aim Higher; Lifelong Learning networks • New progression routes to HE for younger students e.g. 14-19 Diploma; Apprenticeships • Foundation Degrees and Work-based learning • Enhanced CPD in the workplace • Train To Gain for level 3 and above • Employer co-funded programmes
KEY QUESTIONS
• How will employer-engagement be funded? • How do universities deal effectively with workbased learning? SMEs? • Is FE not better suited for e.g. Train to Gain? • How can the HE/FE workforce be developed? • Is the current quality assurance regime appropriate? Especially for bite-sized provision and customised courses? • Is employer demand the same as student demand? • How can the skills landscape be made simpler?
FUNDING THE RIGHT PRIORITIES
• Gap between HE funding (£11 bn) and FE Adult Skills (£3 bn) • Continued focus on 18-30 for widening participation • Part-time HE less well funded and supported than full-time HE. • Even bigger gap between full time HE and full time adult FE (e.g. £1 bn for adult level 3: £11 bn for level 4) • Removal of support for ELQ (“second degrees”) • Review of HE funding due 2009: FE funding? • A comprehensive skills funding system?
Alternative modes of provision
To whom do Employers turn for education and training?
LSEB 2007
The Web 2.0 Revolution
Learning in the Workplace
The onward march of the private sector
“Higher Education Institutions play a huge role in developing the nation’s skills. However, while about £33bn is spent by employers annually on training, higher education accounts for £5 bn. Just 17 universities have over 50% of the £290m actually spent by business in HEIs. So why doesn’t business spend more on higher education? Employers may not be aware of what HEIs can offer. And what HEIs offer may not be what employers need.
What’s required is not only investment, but a shared sense of purpose as HEIs and employers, through their SSCs work together to grow the higher-level skills market.” Skills for Business Network Advertisement, Nov 2007
Thank you
deian.hopkin@lsbu.ac.uk