Vulnerability and Climate Change - The Development Challenge Phil O’Keefe
The Geographical Association, Newcastle, 2008
OVERVIEW
• The political economy of humanitarianism • Climate Change • Key Questions • Exogenous and endogenous pressures • Location of study area • Methodology • Key Hypothesis • Important preliminary results • Agricultural extensification, intensification and off-farm income • How vulnerable are the Chagga to climate change?
The Political Economy of Humanitarianism
•1990-2005 from 500 million to 8 billion
•20 million refugees, 40 million IDPs
•From natural disasters to complex emergencies •Reorganisation of the UN system
•Growth of international NGOs
•A need for pre-disaster planning
Climate Change Challenges
•IPPC 4 - Variability
•Stern - Project to Programme
•Post Kyoto •Carbon footprint negotiations within and between countries
CLIMATE CHANGE
• Synoptic Change; large scale system change -Global movement of ITCZ; high pressure system that dominates African weather -Regional impact of El Nino(e.g.1997); movement of the southern ocean oscillation -Deglaciation of Kilimanjaro but competing explanations; no ice in 25 years
Annual Rainfall
2500
2000
Rainfall (mms)
1500
1000
500
0
Annual Total Rainfall
Rainfall Trend
Source: Kilimanjaro Meteorological Office
Mean Yearly Temperature
31.0
30.5
30.0
Temperature °C
29.5
29.0
28.5
28.0
27.5
Mean Yearly Temperature
Temperature Trend
Source: Kilimanjaro Meteorological Office
Percentage precipitation change
20 15 10 Percent 5 0 2030 -5 2050 2100 Annual June/July/August September/October/November December/Januay/Febuary March/April/May
-10
Projected Temperature Increae °C
3 2.5 Degrees celcius 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2030 2050 2100 Annual June/July/August September/October/November December/Januay/Febuary March/April/May
Source: URT 2003
Inter-Annual Short Rain Variability
400 350 300 Rainfall (mms) 250 200 150 100 50 0
November
December
Inter-Annual Long Rain Variability
1200 1000 Rainfall mms 800 600 400 200 0
March
April
May
Source: Kilimanjaro Meteorological Office
KEY QUESTION:
HOW WILL CLIMATE CHANGE AFFECT AGRICULTURAL SMALL HOLDERS ON KILIMANJARO?
• What is vulnerability?
What is a bad year? What is more important; climate change or climate variability?
• What are the pressures?
Climate Change Changing commodity prices Government policy
• What are the coping mechanism?
Can agricultural intensification decrease vulnerability? Can agricultural extensification decrease vulnerability? What is the role of off-farm income?
WHAT IS VULNERABILITY?
The extent to which a natural or social system is susceptible to sustaining damage from climate change, and is a function of the magnitude of climate change, the sensitivity of the system to changes in climate and the ability to adapt the system to changes in climate
What is a Bad Year?
60 50 Percent 40 30 20
Bad Year Predictors
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
10
0
Bad Harvest Insufficient Food for Family
Low Crop Prices
Other
Delayed Reduced No Rain Extra Warmer Seasonal Seasonal Heavy & than Usual Rains Rainfall Prolonged Downpour
Other
Bad Year Food sources
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT; CLIMATE CHANGE OR VARIABILITY?
• Climate variability used as proxy for climate change • Therefore reducing vulnerability to climate variability is decreasing risk to climate change
Exogenous Pressures Endogenous Pressures
• Climate change/ Climate variability • Declining commodity prices • Government policy Population increase Deforestation Fire risk Subsistence food insecurity • Change of subsistence food crop • • • •
Declining coffee price and production
3.50 40.0
3.00
35.0
30.0 2.50
25.0 2.00 20.0 1.50 15.0
1.00 10.0
0.50
5.0
0.00
0.0
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Real Coffee Price
Kilimanjaro region
Killimanjaro as percentage of Tanzanian coffee production
Real Coffee Price (Price recieved/USD exchange Rate)
Projected Kilimanjaro Population
3500000 250
3000000 200 2500000
150 2000000
1500000 100
1000000 50 500000
0
1967 1978 1988 2002
0
2014
Population
Population per square kilometre
Population Per Square Kilometre
Total Population
LOCATION OF STUDY
• • • • Tanzania Mt Kilimanjaro Kilimanjaro region Moshi rural and Rombo district
ROMBO PROFILE
5,700 Height (feet) 5,200 4,700 4,200 3,700 4 3.75 3.5 3.25 3 3 2.75 2.5 2.25 2 Length (Miles) Rombo B: Homegardens with increase of maize plantations 2 1.75 1.5 1.25 1 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 Rombo
Rombo A: Traditional banana-coffee homegardens
Rombo C: Maize bean plantations increase. Crops smaller due to lack of water
Location: 37°34E to 37°38E at 3’11S
METHODOLOGY
• • • • • • • • • 2 profiles from south to east on Kilimanjaro Built on Rufiji study Questionnaire modification Pilot survey Enumerator Training Enumerator monitoring Data entry checking system 1,016 Household surveys completed over 3 weeks (Map or diagram)
KEY HYPOTHESES
• Mark: How vulnerable are the Chagga to climate change? • Paul: How are capitals accumulated on Mt. Kilimanjaro • Zahra: What are the gender aspects of food security on Mt. Kilimanjaro? • Matt: What are the government responses to famine?
OTHER DATA SOURCES
• • • • • • • Secondary survey Key informant interviews Physical asset checklist Structured observation Transect walks Theoretical context setting secondary data Location specific secondary data
ACCESS TO WATER SOURCES AS VULNERABILITY INDICATOR
Rombo A
18% 48% 34% 39% 57% 45% 52%
Rombo B
3% 1%
Rombo C
3%
Old Moshi
8% 1% 7%
Marangu
2% 2% 25%
Lower Moshi
30% 23%
25%
59%
71%
2%
45%
LEVEL OF EDUCATION RELATED TO INFORMATION
Source of information Agricultural Extension Officer Other Farmers Seed Suppliers Media Nowhere Total Level Of Education (Percentages) No Adult Primary Secondary College Schooling Education Education Education university Total
23 28
4 45 100
20 40
3 37 100
32 32 4 4 28 100
44 20 10 5 21 100
50 9 18 5 18 100
32.6 30.1 4.8 3.8 28.8 100
Differentiation of women’s coping mechanism by age
Women’s coping mechanism
Age (percentages)
18-37 38-57 57+ Total
Petty Buisness
Remittances Others Total
70
13 17 100
64
15 21 100
47
30 23 100
59
20 21 100
DIVISION OF LABOUR IN COFFEE PRODUCTION
Coffee Harvester(s) Male Parent Female Parent Male & Female Parent Children Parents & Children Others Sex (percent) Male 9 19 42 2 25 1 Female 3 44 23 3 22 5 Total 7 29 35 3 24 3 Coffee Marketer (s) Sex (percent) Male Female Total 43 20 31 2 4 17 61 13 2 5 2 34 34 25 2 4 1
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
How many cattle owned? Number Frequency Percent 0 1 510 233 50.2 23.0
How many cattle loaned from others? Number Frequency Percent 0 1 881 84 86.8 8.3
How many chickens owned? Frequenc Number y Percent 0 1-4 261 286 25.7 28.2
2
3 4 5+ Total
174
57 28 13 1015
17.1
5.6 2.8 1.3 100.0
2
3 4 5+ Total
34
5 5 6 1015
3.3
0.5 0.5 0.6 100.0
5-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49
237
156 46 12 9
23.3
15.4 4.5 1.2 0.9
50+
Total
8
1015
0.8
100.0
Total Income 2005
Money USD Percent
Total Income 2006
Money USD Percent
Median Mean Per day
133800 305523 837
112 255 0.7
Median Mean Per day
178000 370544 1015 37647320 4 16167852 5 53403000 50207600
28109200 24768600
148 309 0.8
Total
Off-farm income Remittances Bananas
Milk Livestock
310411786
146569750 45641650 40377900
15106250 22457500
258676
122141 38035 33648
12589 18715
100
47.2 14.7 13
4.9 7.2
Total Off-farm income
Remittances Bananas
Milk Livestock
313728
134732 44503 41840
23424 20641
100
42.9
14.2
13.3
7.5 6.6
Coffee
Maize Fruits Wood Other farm Beans
16822300
12268536 3634350 2567500 1670900 1550000
14019
10224 3029 2140 1392 1292
5.4
4 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.5
Coffee
Maize Fruits Beans Wood Millet
22500800
20040510 4692699 3661950 3476000 1280600
18751
16700 3911 3052 2897 1067
6
5.3 1.2
1 0.9 0.4
Distribution of income
800000
700000
600000
500000
TSH
400000
300000
200000
100000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Percentiles
Are you aware of climate change?
Yes
No Missing
953
39 24
94
4 2
What are the Impacts of climate change?
Frequency
Percent
Shorter Rain Seasons & Insufficient Rainfall Insufficient Rainfall Shorter Rain Seasons
Shorter Rain Seasons & Flood/Drought INcreases Flood/Drought Increases Insufficient Rainfall & Flood/Drought Increases
403 237 164
95 53 34
40 23 16
9 5 3
Others
8
3
CAN AGRICULTURAL EXTENSIFICATION DECREASE VULNERABILITY?
Forest limits – national park Bush Savannah no longer exists Large scale farming constraints Maize-bean shambas on lowlands due to availability of water • Finger Millet – Cow peas extreme drought adaptation, illustrates the limits of cultivation without irrigation • Population increase and landuse planning/ownership limit extensification opportunities • • • •
CAN AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION DECREASE VULNERABILITY?
• Intensifying by cash cropping or diversifying subsistence food production • Is coffee rehabilitation possible?
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF OFF-FARM INCOME?
• Options of movement -Local -Regional -National • Importance of transport • Importance of education
What is the meaning of this case study?
•Adaptation is evolution
•Coping mechanisms suggest involution
•The need for post Kyoto to be adaptation focused
•The need for pre-disaster planning