PowerPoint Presentation - Ocean Mixed Layer Dynamics and its
Shared by: hcj
-
Stats
- views:
- 17
- posted:
- 9/4/2011
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 43
Document Sample


Ocean Mixed Layer Dynamics and its
Impact on SST & Climate Variability
Michael Alexander
Earth System Research Lab
michael.alexander@noaa.gov
http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/people/
michael.alexander/presentations
Ocean Mixed layer
• Turbulence creates a well mixed
surface layer where temperature (T),
salinity (S) and density (ρ) are nearly
uniform with depth surface
• Primarily driven by vertical processes
(assumed here) but can interact with
3-D circulation T s
• Density jump usually controlled by
temperature but sometimes by salinity ∆T
(especially in high latitudes)
• Often “ measured” by the depth at
which T is some value less than SST
(e.g. ∆T = 0.5)
• Under goes large seasonal cycle
• This impacts the evolution of ocean
temperature anomalies and has
important biological consequences
∆T=Tb-Tm
Vertical Flux: Entrainment and MLD (h)
Entrainment “To pull or draw along after itself”
MLD – Mixed Layer Depth or h
When deepening:
dh/dt = we
we = M + B – D / (Dr - S)
Where
M - Mechanical Turbulence (wind stirring)
B - Buoyancy Forcing
Net surface heating/cooling (Qnet)
Precipitation – Evaporation (P-E)
D - Dissipation (eh)
- Density jump at base of the
ML
S - Shear across ML (not in all models)
When Shoaling:
we = 0 (no detrainment, h reforms closer to
the surface)
h = M /(B – D)
Seasonal Cycle of Temp & MLD
Northeast Pacific (50ºN, 145ºW)
MLD (h)
Climatological Mixed Layer Depth (m)
SST Tendency Equation
Integrated heat budget over the mixed layer:
¶Tm Q net - Q swh æ w + we ö
= +ç ÷ (Tb - Tm )- v ×ÑTm + AÑ 2Tm
¶t r ch è h ø
Variables
v – velocity (current in ML)
Tm – mixed layer temp (SST) Qnet
Tb – temp just beneath ML
h – mixed layer depth
w – mean vertical velocity
we – entrainment velocity
Qnet – net surface heat flux
Qswh – penetrating shortwave radiation
A – horizontal eddy viscosity coefficient
– density of sea water
C – Specific heat of sea water
Temperature change due
to the surface heat flux
• Over March through August a location in the North Pacific
typically receives 150 Wm-2 flux through the surface. Assuming
a constant mixed layer depth of 50 m, and no other changes in
the ocean how much will the SST change over that time?
• dTm/dt = d(SST)/dt = Qnet/ρch
SST = (Qnet/ρch) x t
• ρ = 1025 kg/m3; c = 3850 Joules/(kg °C)
SST = (150 Wm-2 / (1025 kg m-3 x 3850 Joules kg-1 °C-1 x 50
m)) * (184 days * 86400 s day-1)
• SST = 12.1°C
• => Check units (W = J s-1)
• => reasonable value for winter to summer change in SST
Surface Heat Flux Entrainment Flux
Zonal Average
Mean
Standard
Deviation
Observed Standard Deviation
of SST Anomalies (°C)
March
August
Processes for Generating
SST Anomalies
Simple model for generating SST variability
“stochastic model”
Heat fluxes associated Ocean response to flux back heat
with weather events, which slowly damps SST anomalies
“random forcing”
F -Tm
Air-sea interface
SST anomalies form dTm/dt = Qnet
ρch
Fixed depth ocean
dTm/dt = F – Tm
No currents ρch
Bottom
Stochastic SST Anomaly model II
idealized forcing and time series
Null Hypothesis for midlatitude SST variability
Stochastic Model: correspondence to the real world?
Observed and Theoretical Spectra for SST anomalies (SSTA)
at a location in the North Pacific Ocean
No damping
SSTA Variance
Temperature Variance
Spread (5%-95%)
Observed
Theoretical spectra
(white line) of
Atm forcing stochastic model
10 yr 1yr 1 mo
Period
Atmospheric forcing and ocean feedback can be estimated from data. Then can
then develop stochastic model and generate multiple time series to look at spread
Patterns of Surface Fluxes and SSTs:
example North Atlantic Oscillation
Contours are sea level pressure (SLP); vectors - winds
Shading left is SST anomalies, on right is the Flux anomalies
NAO north-south SLP anomaly pattern over the Atlantic
The Reemergence Mechanism
Qnet’
• Winter Surface flux anomalies
• Create SST anomalies which
spread over ML
• ML reforms close to surface in
spring
• Summer SST anomalies
strongly damped by air-sea
interaction
• Temperature anomalies persist
in summer thermocline
MLD • Re-entrained into the ML in the
following fall and winter
Namias and Born 1970, 1974;
Alexander and Deser (1995, JPO); Alexander et al. 1999
+
Reemergence in three North Pacific
regions
Regression between SST
anomalies in April-May
with monthly temperature
anomalies as a function of
depth.
Regions
Alexander et al. (1999, J. Climate)
Reemergence in the North Atlantic
Reg 2 - Northeast Atlantic (47%)
Reg 1 - Subtropical Atlantic (48%)
Timlin, Alexander, Deser,
2002, J.Climate
Reemergence of SST Tripole
Leading EOF of March SST Auto-correlation of EOF PC time series
Reemergence of the
SST North Atlantic tripole
Level of
significance
ERSSTv2 Datasets [1950-2003]
Degrees Celsius
Watanabe and Kimoto (2000); Timlin et al. 2002, Deser et al 2003,
De Coetlogon and Frankignoul 2003 : all in J. Climate
Impact of reemergence on SST Persistence:
Augmenting the Stochastic SST model
Entraining
Model (EM)
Obs (dashed)
Heat content (EM)
SST (EM)
SST (OBS)
r(t ) = exp [ -lt rch ]
Deser et al. 2003
North Atlantic Entraining
Model (EM)
Obs (dashed)
Heat content (EM)
SST (EM)
SST (OBS)
Deser et al. 2003
Heff = winter MLD for interannual variability in a stochastic model
Main Concepts
• Mixed Layers
– Processes that control its depth
– Wind stirring buoyancy forcing, density jump at base of ML
– Processes that control its temperature (SST)
• Surface heat flux
• Entrainment heat flux
• Mechanisms for the behavior of SST anomalies
• Stochastic model
• Reemergence
• Large scale patterns of atmospheric forcing organizes fluxes, shapes
SST Anomaly and reemergence patterns
• Questions?
1. What is the oceanic reemergence? 2. Surface signature of reemergence in the Labrador Sea
Auto-correlation of the Labrador SST time series
(Starting from March), e.g. for lag=1, March and April
time series are correlated, for lag =2 March and May etc.
Sea Surface
Temperature
e-folding = ~ 36 mths
Level of
significance
ERSSTv2 Datasets [1950-2003]
e-folding = ~ 4 mths
e-folding = ~ 4 mths
Degrees Celcius
Deser et al. 2003 (J.Clim)
Reemergence of the late Auto-correlation of the Labrador SST time series
(all months considered), e.g. for lag=1, Jan50/Feb50/…/Dec00
winter SST anomalies values are correlated with Feb50/Mar50/…/Jan01 values
a year after
Atmosphere forcing the ocean in winter:
NAO & the Atlantic SST tripole
March SST EOF1 (shade)
Regressed JFM SLP (contour)
PC time series: March SST (bars),
JFM MSLP (line)
Correlation=0.63
NCEP MSLP [1950-2003]
e.g. Deser and Timlin (1997), J.Clim.
Summary
• Forcing of SST (mixed layer temperature
– Net heat flux key term, Ekman transport & entrainment also
important
– SST anomalies larger in summer than winer due to shallow MLD
• Processes that impact extratropical SST variability
– Stochastic atmospheric forcing
– Reemergence
• Atmospheric Bridge
– Tropical Pacific => Global SSTs
– Impacts in both winter and summer
– Influence of air-sea feedback on extratropical atmosphere complex
• Other Processes that influence SST variability
– Cloud - SST feedbacks
– Ocean currents & Rossby waves in western N. Pacific
– Changes in the Thermohaline Circulation
Additional Topics
• The flux components and their variability
• Schematic of the mixed layer model
• Pattern of atmospheric circulation (SLP) and the
underlying fluxes)
• Basin-wide reemergence
• The Pacific Decadal Oscillation
• Wind generated Rossby waves and its relation to
SSTs
• The Latif and Barnett mechanism for the PDO and
“problems” with this mechanism
Atmosphere-Ocean Ice Model
Atmospheric GCM
– NCAR CAM2–T42 resolution
Ice
Thermodynamic portion of NCAR CSIMv4
Ocean
Mixed layer Model (MLM)
• An individual column model with a uniform mixed layer
• Atop a layered model that represents conditions in the pycnocline
• Prognostic ML depth
• Same grids as the atmosphere (128 lon x 64 lat)
• 36 vertical levels (from 0m to 1500m depth)
• higher resolution close to surface and a realistic bathymetry
• Flux correction needed to get reasonable climate
• Cassou et al. 2007 J Clim; Alexander et al. 2000 JGR, Alexander et al 2002 – J.Clim ;
Gaspar 1988 – JPO
Mixed Layer Ocean Model
Qnet Qcor
h
Qwe Tm1 (MLD)
Tb1
Qswh
CA
Mean ML Budget terms (Wm-2) in January
From an AGCM couple to a mixed layer ocean model
Surface Flux
Qnet
Ekman
Qek =
rcvek(Tm)
Entrainment
Qwe =
rcwe(Tb-Tm)
Mean Mixed
Layer Budget
terms (Wm-2)
in August
Standard
Deviation of
the Mixed
Layer Budget
Terms (Wm-2)
in January
Standard Deviation of Fluxes in August
Results from an AGCM- Ocean MLM
Qnet
W m-2
Qwe =
rcwe(Tb-Tm)
W m-2
Qwe /
Qnet
Wind Generated Rossby Waves
L Atmosphere
ML Ocean
Thermocline
Rossby
West East
Waves
1) After waves pass ocean currents adjust
2) Waves change thermocline depth, if mixed layer reaches that
depth, cold water can be mixed to the surface
Observed Rossby Waves & SST
Correlation Obs SST hindcast
With thermocline depth anomaly KE Region: 40°N, 140°-170°E
SSTOB
S
March SSTfcst
Forecast equation for SST based on integrating wind stress
(curl) forcing and constant propagation speed of the
(1st Baroclinic) Rossby wave
Schneider and Miller 2001 (J. Climate)
Forecast Skill: Correlation with Obs
SST Wave Model & Reemergence
Wave Model Reemergence
years
Schneider and Miller 2001 (J. Climate)
Climatological heat fluxes August
Zonal
Average of
the
standard
deviation of
the mixed
layer
budget
terms
Observed SST (C) / SLP (mb) Warm-Cold (50-
03)
DJF
JAS
Evolution of the leading pattern of SST variability
as indicated by extended EOF analyses
No ENSO; ENSO;
Reemergence No Reemergence
Alexander et al. 2001, Prog. Ocean.
Upper Ocean: Temperature and mixed layer
depth
El Niño – La Niña model composite: Central North Pacific
Alexander et al. 2002, J. Climate
ENSO SST & MLD in Western N. Pacific
Region
Niño – Niña: NCEP Ocean Temp & White MLD (1980-2001)
La Niña MLD
°
C
El Niño MLD
Get documents about "