Anti Corruption
Document Sample


Anti-Corruption
USAID/Central Asian Republics
Beth Salamanca
February 10, 2004
What We’ll Cover
What is Corruption?
Why Corruption is an Issue for USAID
Types and Causes of Corruption
How Bad is it in Central Asia?
Costs & Consequences of Corruption
What Are We Doing About It?
Next Steps
What Is Corruption?
Misuse of public office for private
gain:
– Embezzlement
– Nepotism
– Bribery
– Extortion
– Influence peddling
– Fraud
What it is Not
Corruption facilitates an environment for
criminal activities such as:
– Drug trafficking
– Money laundering
– Prostitution
USAID does not address criminal activities
under its anti-corruption programs;
USAID does not focus on corruption
between private entities
Why Corruption is an Issue
for USAID
Significant obstacle to economic and
democratic development
Reduces impact and sustainability of
USAID development activities
Has destabilizing effect on a country’s
politics and economics
Types of Corruption
Systematic vs. Sporadic
– Corruption is the rule vs. being the exception to the rule
Organized vs. Disorganized
– Organized: involves a number of officials across multiple
organizations taking part in and sharing gains
Example: a customs official gets his job through a favor or bribe,
then has to share a portion of the bribes he collects with superiors
– Disorganized: Occurs opportunistically, on case-by-case basis
Example: a judge takes a bribe for a desired ruling on a case
Grand Corruption vs. Petty Corruption
– Large scale abuse of public trust vs. small scale;
Large Scale: a public official purchases an airline then denies landing
rights to other air carriers;
Petty: a Policeman extracts a bribe instead of writing a traffic ticket
Other Types of Corruption
Political – Involves elected public
official who gives preferential
treatment in exchange for votes or
campaign contributions
Bureaucratic – Involves bureaucratic
officials, e.g., tax, fire, health
inspectors who charge bribes to visit
USAID Focuses on
Systematic
Organized
Grand
- Because of corrosive effects on host
government political and economic systems
- To increase sustainability
- To leverage limited resources
How Bad is it in Central Asia?
2001 2002 2003
USA (16)
USA (17)
USA (19)
UZ (69)
KZ (73)
UZ (74) RU (74)
RU (81)
KZ (87) RU ( 87)
KZ (101)
UZ (103)
KG (119)
TJ (128)
Costs & Consequences
Political Consequences
Makes for bad government -- based motives of
corrupt officials, not on the will of the people
Reduces rule of law
Limits concept of one person, one vote—payoffs
skew elections
Erodes institutional capacity of government as
corrupt officials siphon resources
Undermines government legitimacy – reduces
peoples trust and tolerance
Costs & Consequences
Economic Costs
Increases the cost of doing business due to bribe
paying
Reduces competition by giving unfair advantage to
bribe givers
Distorts public revenues and expenditures -- contracts
go to the highest briber, not the most skilled or best
contractor
Scares away investors -- investors need predictability;
don’t want to pay ―unofficial taxes‖
Decreases government revenue base -- people loose
faith in their government so stop paying taxes
Causes of Corruption
Wide Government Authority – more likely when officials have
wide control of transactions
Little Accountability – no checks & balances; the lower the
chance of discovery, the higher the rate of corruption; officials
can get away with it if there is little oversight, transparency or
sanctions
Insufficient Incentives – incentive to be self-serving is greater
incentive to be public serving; poor wage causes need to skim
Personal Loyalties – loyalty to families, friends, ethnic groups is
the principle driver, not Rule of Law. ―Patronage System‖ is
where people gain advantage through personal rather than
official channels
Ineffective Government – induces disregard for system
Cornerstone Principles of
Anti-Corruption Policy
1. Clear national security interest in reducing
corruption to ensure stable political systems
and democracy
2. Fight against corruption must occur at national
and local levels in every country on a number of
fronts to root out and prevent corruption
3. International community plays key role in
encouraging governments to act by raising
visibility and political profile of national and
local actions
Anti-Corruption Goals
1. Unite governments under common
anti-corruption commitments
2. Help governments meet or exceed
those commitments
3. Mobilize popular will and private
sector action
4. Lead by example
3 Components of an
Anti-Corruption Strategy
1. TRANSPARENCY
2. TRANSPARENCY
3. TRANSPARENCY
• Investigate and prosecute corrupt officials
• Sustained public education and awareness program
• Help to institute preventive measures in gov’t structures
USAID Responses to
Corruption
Institutional Reforms ~ Change how public & private sectors interact
Wide Authority Limit Authority
– competitive procurement, competition in public services
Little Accountability Improve Accountability
– Reduce opportunities for corruption
Streamline tax collection, clarify customs code, e.g., Trade Facilitation &
Investment; Fiscal reform Project
– Increase transparency:
financial disclosure; increased transparency in commercial lending and banks
open budget, e.g., Fiscal Reform Project promoting transparency of the
national budget and expenditures
financial management systems, e.g., Fiscal Reform Project
– Oversight: audit capability, anti-corruption agency, hot lines, whistleblower
protection
– Sanctions: criminal/administrative sanctions, judicial reform (ABA/CEELI)
Ineffective Incentives Realign Incentives for Gov’t Employees
– Provide a living wage, increase professionalism, ethics codes, eliminate ghost
workers
USAID Responses to
Corruption
Societal Reforms ~ Mobilize public support for change
Monitor & Measure
– Survey and publish perceptions, e.g., Transparency
International -- Corruption Perception Index
Raise Awareness
– Let people know the costs of corruption – investigative
journalism, public relations campaigns, simple signage
Mobilize Public Will for Change
– Via international pressure and professional organizations,
OECD, UN, CIPE, World Bank
Anti-Corruption Team
Who We Are What We Do:
17 ACT members Develop and implement methods
Kaya Adams, DM to assess host country needs
Clifford Brown, KCO Seek opportunities for successful
Aigul Berdygulova, PS anti-corruption interventions;
Michael Fritz, DO Develop and implement anti-
Gulmira Kuanzhanova, EF corruption programs;
Oksana Lebedeva, FM Coordinate implementation of
Jessica Leonard, HE USAID and US Government anti-
John Lord, Contracts Officer corruption programs with other
Jeremiah Maurer, Web Design donors in the CAR; and
Patty McCabe, TKO Develop and carry out activities for
Ashley Moretz, TCO enhancing skills among AC Team
Gennadiy Orekhov, DM members and staff.
Robert Simmons, UCO
Any Tohill Stull, PS
Altay Toxanbayev, A&A
Mark Urban, EF
Sergey Yelkin, EW
Beth Salamanca, MS
Anti-Corruption Team
Activities
NGO Training on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Anti-Corruption Center – Transparency Kazakhstan
Anti-Corruption Websites
– Internal: http://intranet/anti-corruption/index.html
– External: http://www.zzapp.org/bsalaman/act
USAID/CAR Corruption Survey Baseline
Cross-cutting activities - all sectors, all countries
Inventory of Anti-Corruption Activities
– Matrix by SO, IR and Country
– Country Descriptions
Policy; PAAMS MO to include AC Checklist
Respond to State Department and USAID/W queries
Technical training for staff and partners
Donor Collaboration
Where We Go From Here
Anti-Corruption Specialist provides Technical Assist.
Anti-Corruption Training, Almaty - 3/4/04
Regional Anti-Corruption Assessment, 3/21 - 4/9
– Roundtables for each Tech Office; each Country Office
– Nature and extent of problem
– Determine political will for change, identify receptive
actors at national and local level
– Identify opportunities and constraints
Develop AC Strategy and Action Plan
Train the Mission on new Strategy/Action Plan
Execute the Plan
Get documents about "