VIEWS: 2 PAGES: 5 POSTED ON: 9/3/2011
http://www.mtxoom.com/political/ A Real Certificate of Live Birth For Obama? Very recently, the Commonwealth of Virginia required to me to obtain an embossed copy of my original birth certificate from the Oklahoma Department of Vital Records in order to qualify for a Virginia Driver's license. An earlier embossed copy of my original birth certificate, which I had obtained for 15 dollars in 1981, was considered as unacceptable, since one of the Virginia DMV supervisors, in the City of Springfield, could not "feel" the embossing on the 28 year old copy. This frustrating happening caused me to ponder, even more so, the suspicious circumstances surrounding the Obama presidential eligibility issue. With the controversy as thick as it is, especially with the recent strange dismissal of the federal case "Keyes v. Obama" by California Federal District Judge David O. Carter, the matter of whether Barack H. Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States is far from being over. The issue of Obama's eligibility to be a U.S. President is as suspicious as ever, and his obstinate refusal to produce his original Hawaiian birth certificate for public perusal, to the tune of over a million dollars that he has spent in legal costs to oppose the lawsuits against him, casts a long shadow of impropriety over his honesty and credibility. This original birth certificate, the one that is supposed to contain the same certified information that Virginia wanted from me, is the crux of the controversy. Why won't he merely allow the original birth certificate to be published in the nation's newspapers and on the Internet? The information listed on my certificate of live birth is much more than what is listed on that green document published by Obama on the Internet. I have discovered from the State of Hawaii that these green certificates of live birth may be regularly obtained, for a fee, by immigrant parents of children born in foreign countries. As opposed to what Obama claims is authoritative information on his green document, supposedly showing that he was born in Hawaii, the information contained on my certificate of live birth includes the following: 1. Place of birth a. County b. City of Town c. Name of Hospital or Institution d. Length of mother's stay - specification of time required before delivery. 2. Usual residence of mother: a. State b. County c. City of Town - specifying whether inside or outside corporate limits d. Street number 3. Full name of child 4. Date of birth 5. Sex 6. Twin or triplet - required specification of order of birtth 7. Number months of pregnancy 8. Child's weight Father of Child 9. Full name 10. Color or race 11. Age at time of birth 12. Birthplace 13. Usual occupation 14. Industry or business Mother of Child 15. Full maiden name 16. Color or race 17. Age at time of birth 18. Birthplace 19. Usual occupation 20. Industry or business 21. Other children born to this mother a. Number of other children of this mother now living b. Number of other children born alive but now dead c. Number of children born dead 22. Mother's mailing address for registration notice 23. Was a prophylactic drug used in the baby's eyes? Was a serologic test made for syphilis in this mother? Date required. 24 Certification of doctor delivering the baby - hour, date, and address required as well as mother's signature. 25. Date received by local registrar 26. Registrar's signature Thirty-eight pieces of information was required to properly complete my certificate of live birth, and if you will compare the information required on the original certificates of live birth issued by the other 49 states, you will find them almost identical, unless some radical changes have been made by the state legislatures, which I seriously doubt. Consequently, as may be clearly realized, the certificate of live birth published by Obama on the Internet is sorely lacking quite a few pieces of essential information, which to the Commonwealth of Virginia is necessary to get a mere driver's license. In my previous essay concerning Federal Judge David O. Carter's dismissal of "Keyes v. Obama," I mentioned that what Judge Carter had said going into the first stages of litigation ("that the determination of U.S. constitutional presidential eligibility goes to the core of legal certification as to whether the elected President may lawfully issue orders as the U.S. Commander in Chief of the military") does not match his sudden dismissal of the case when the U.S. Department of Justice became illegally involved. Why was the USDOJ's involvement in the case improper? Well, imagine for a moment Attorney General Eric Holder, a federal officer, being sued by one of his neighbors for assuming the position of Attorney General unlawfully, for as you know, anyone with time and money on their hands may freely file a lawsuit against anyone in tate of federal court. So, the private case is filed in federal court against Holder and he subsequently uses his influence as a federal officer to get all of the case litigation to be handled by attorneys at the U.S. Department of Justice, at taxpayer expense. As you might think, this would be very wrong and very illegal. Holder, in that particular case, would have to bear the burden, as any other citizen, of providing for his own defense by hiring a private attorney at his own expense to represent him in federal court. The mere fact that Obama has spent tax money and campaign funds contributed by his supporters, not his own money, to legally oppose being required to disclose his original birth certificate, and other health and educational records, that would assist in establishing whether he is, as he has claimed to be, a natural born citizen of the United States should greatly concern the average citizen voter. By all genuine prevailing standards, the document that Obama has furnished on the Internet to prove his presidential eligibility is totally unsatisfactory as a record of birth; and, either, an honest federal judge or the U.S. Congress should legally require Barack H. Obama, alias Barry Soetoro, to produce his original Hawaiian birth certificate and disclose it to the nation to establish that he is eligible, according to the U.S. Constitution, to be President of the United States. As I have said before, Obama must be trying to hide some very important facts from becoming public knowledge, or, else, he would not have spent over a million dollars to keep from disclosing a document that would cost him only a mere $25.00, that being a certified copy of his original birth certificate.
Pages to are hidden for
"A Real Certificate of Live Birth For Obama-"Please download to view full document