PRIVATE PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS:
EFFICIENT SUSTAINABLE REPLICABLE
17TH OF APRIL 2009
CONTENTS
•WHY PPP? –INVERTING THE PYRAMID – REACHING OUT • PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES -MYTHS AND REALITIES •THE GOVERNMENT STANCE •OVER COMING CHALLENGES-BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE MODEL •LEARNING FROM SUCCESSES & FAILURES-c-SAS: A CASE STUDY •LESSONS IN REPLICABILITY– PPP IN HEALTH : A CASE STUDY
OUR CLIENT
The Indian Market… 1.123 Billion
6.5mn 0.58 % = Tip of the Pyramid 1000K>
13.0 mn
1.16 % =
Upper Middle 500K-1000K
59.2 mn
Upwardly Mobile 200K-500K
5.27 % =
91.3 mn
Middle Class 90K-200K
44.13 % =
495.8 mn
Vulnerable <90K
48.86 % = 549.0 mn
213.3 mn
BPL = 19% =
Deprived BPL
Source: Registrar General; NCAER; McKinsey
…with different needs even within the same income segment.
Building Systems that give the Poor Top Priority
Low-Income Households
LARGE ENTERPRISES
Middle Class
Wealthy Enabling the Poor at the bottom of the pyramid Is a social obligation …….and can also be a commercially viable choice!
PRIVATE PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP- KEY TO SUSTAINABILITY
Institutional Spectrum
Government Procurement
Public Private Partnership Design-Build-Operate (DBO) Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO)+ Government Ownership DBFO + Private Ownership + Transfer to Govt at end of contract DBFO + Private Ownership (no transfer) Privatization
5
CONTENTS
•WHY PPP? –INVERTING THE PYRAMID – REACHING OUT • PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES -MYTHS AND REALITIES •THE GOVERNMENT STANCE •OVER COMING CHALLENGES-BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE MODEL •LEARNING FROM SUCCESSES & FAILURES-c-SAS: A CASE STUDY •LESSONS IN REPLICABILITY– PPP IN HEALTH : A CASE STUDY
Myths and Realities – Public Sector
Mutual Mistrust
Myths Private approach not fit for Poor Realities
Skilled financial prudence for Effective Sustainability Institutional support for holistic technical evaluation
Localized Needs and Stake holder Participation Concrete solutions – Best practices Build islands of excellence! Launch, Learn and Replicate
Product selection Process – L1
Top down approach ―One shoe fits all‖ Big Bang Approach
Myths and Realities – Private Sector
Mutual Mistrust
Myths Lack of ClarityGovernment Change?(*ROB-FBD.) Realities Stable PPP Policy Framework
PPP not profitable
―A sweet heart deal‖ – opaque selection Target group unfamiliarDifficult to service Govt. difficult to work with - Bureaucratic procedures
Innovative approach Key to profitability
In-built transparency
Innovative approach- Opportunity Common objective. Negotiated agreement
CONTENTS
•WHY PPP? –INVERTING THE PYRAMID – REACHING OUT • PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES -MYTHS AND REALITIES •THE GOVERNMENT STANCE •OVER COMING CHALLENGES-BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE MODEL •LEARNING FROM SUCCESSES & FAILURES-c-SAS: A CASE STUDY •LESSONS IN REPLICABILITY– PPP IN HEALTH : A CASE STUDY
THE GOVERENMENT’S PERSPECTIVE
Government of India stance towards PPP - proactive Planning Commission Documents
Guidelines for Financial Support to PPP in Infrastructure 2006 (www.infrastructure.gov.in) Report of PPP Social Sector Sub-group, 2004
FM’s Speech -Conference of State Secretaries on Infrastructure
-PPP for large investments needed in infrastructure
Rs.2.2 lakh crores—Highways by 2012 Rs.40,000 crores—Airports by 2010 Rs. 50,000 crores – Ports by 2012
Major Initiatives- Ports, Roads, Railways, Power & Civil Aviation State Government Initiatives—
Housing Project- Kolkata West Bengal Ports & Urban Infrastructure- Gujrat Roads- Maharashtra, Punjab
10
DECISION CRITERIA
Lowest capital cost of project Lowest operation & maintenance costs Lowest Bid in terms of present value of user fees Lowest present value of payments from government Highest upfront fee Highest revenue share to government Shortest Concession period
11
CONTENTS
•WHY PPP? –INVERTING THE PYRAMID – REACHING OUT • PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES -MYTHS AND REALITIES •THE GOVERNMENT STANCE •OVER COMING CHALLENGES-BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE MODEL •LEARNING FROM SUCCESSES & FAILURES-c-SAS: A CASE STUDY •LESSONS IN REPLICABILITY– PPP IN HEALTH : A CASE STUDY
Long Gestation Periods
CHALLENGES
Cost recovery through User charges
Arbitration/ Dispute Resolution
not possible
Institutional Arrangements Efficient and well developed Financial Sector
Commercial viability of Public goods and Services cannot be guaranteed
Change in law
Stable Macro-economic Framework
―Viability Gap Funding Scheme
Balancing competing interests
Ministry of Finance, DEA, July 2005 Capital grant- 20% of total project cost
13
THE REGULATORY CHALLENGE BALANCING DIFFERENT INTERESTS Service Provider State
maximize sale/ concession value; protect users; maximize profits Maintain privileges reduce State subsidies
Current Consumers (non-poor)
Excluded Households (Poor)
-
-
reduce tariffs
expand coverage
Essentials of an Effective PPP
Build on Commonality of Objective
Leveraging off Mutual Skills & Resources
Filling Mutual Capability Gaps
Building Trust
Sustainable provision of Quality and Efficient Service Delivery
HISTORICAL PARALLELS: •Communication Revolution Through Telephony •NHAI Road Policy-Building Infrastructure- Enhancing Access and Connectivity
ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS
Stable policy framework for PPP Governments change Assurance of Transparency Investor’s need Stakeholder Involvement and Consultation Mutual Trust for (and through) Success Well-articulated and Comprehensive Agreement Flexibility & Responsiveness in Decision-Making Periodic Monitoring for Efficiency Quality & Standards of Services for Sustainability
16
THE PPP MODEL
Common Objective Public Sector Private Sector OUTCOME
EFFICIENT & QUALITY DELIVERY OF PUBLIC SERVICES **Financing Care
through Health Insurance for the Poor
•Social skills •Financial Resources
•Efficiencies •Technical skills •Risk Management
Sustainable & Efficient Service Delivery System
Leveraging mutual strengths
PARTIAL RISK GUARANTEES MITIGATE CONCERNS RELATED TO GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
A
Partial Risk Guarantee (PRG) covers lenders in case the Government does not meet its commitments
Loans
Project Company Government Undertakings
Commercial Lenders
Guarantee Indemnity Agreement
Government
World Bank
CONTENTS
•WHY PPP? –INVERTING THE PYRAMID – REACHING OUT • PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES -MYTHS AND REALITIES •THE GOVERNMENT STANCE •OVER COMING CHALLENGES-BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE MODEL •LEARNING FROM SUCCESSES & FAILURES-c-SAS: A CASE STUDY •LESSONS IN REPLICABILITY– PPP IN HEALTH : A CASE STUDY
LEARNING FROM PPP SUCCESSES & FAILURES
Success Stories:
DELHI-GURGAON EXPRESSWAY NATIONAL HIGHWAY AGENCY - ROAD FINANCING THROUGH BOTS, NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE EAST COAST ROAD- REHABILITATIONTAMILNADU TAMILNADU URBAN DEVELOPMENT FUND TIRRUPUR WATER SUPPLY PROJECT MAHARASHTRA C- SAS EXPERIENCE** PPP HEALTH MODELS**
Cautionary Lessons:
ENRON DABHOL-- POWER POLITICS BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AIRPORT PRIVATISATION PPP IN HEALTH CARE**
CASE STUDY I:
THE MAHARASHTRA EXPERIENCE
PPP-STAMPS ®ISTRATION DUTY
PROCESSES:
Tender process by Govt. of Maharashtra to appoint panel of Turnkey Solution Providers Panel of 15 agencies finalised as TSP’s including TCS,IBM,MBT,C-DAC,NIC etc. Preparation of detailed project proposal by the Dept. Pre-feasibility report & Cost estimation by the TSP’s Selection of the TSP- c-DAC- for the Stamps & Registration Dept Vendor Management software &Detailed System Study by the TSP Pilot deployment & fine tuning Operationalization
OUTCOMES:
All offices-Sub-Registrar/Joint District Registrar/DIG of Registration- computerised Enhanced Efficiency and Transparency 1.5 million documents registered annually. Revenue collection enhanced ~4500 crore Revenue Sharing Model Stakeholders Buy-in Govt/TSP/BOT Vendors User Friendly with Evidence of stamp duty payment Client Satisfaction. Security based on the strength of central system & Unique ID for each transaction Integration with the central system Reduces element of Fraud
C-SAS Architecture
ACC --> Authorised Collection Centre SR--> Sub Registrar Office
Purchaser
ACC
TransactionAmount Govt.Treasury
State Level Depository Firewall Firewall Unique IDGeneration
ACC Database
WebServer
SR Internet
Dial-up Modem Dial-up Modem
SR
Computerised Stamp Duty Administration System
ACC
Citizen
Data entry.
Connect to central server Generation of Unique No.
Payment
Imprint of No. & 2 D Bar code
Registration
Unique ID& Proof
CONTENTS
•WHY PPP? –INVERTING THE PYRAMID – REACHING OUT • PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES -MYTHS AND REALITIES •THE GOVERNMENT STANCE •OVER COMING CHALLENGES-BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE MODEL •LEARNING FROM SUCCESSES & FAILURES-c-SAS: A CASE STUDY • LESSONS IN REPLICABILITY – PPP IN HEALTH : A CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY II- PPP IN HEALTH
PARTNERSHIP PROFILE
Profile of Private Partners: From individual physicians to a large corporate hospital
Partnership Models: From contracting to voucher scheme
Complexity: From simple diet to complex community - based health insurance
Value: From Rs. 27 to > Coverage of Hospitalization
Nature of Services: From emergency transport to tele-Cardiology
Location: From remote hills / islands to urban slums
CBHI & PPP schemes for the unorganised sector
Community-based health insurance schemes
State government schemes
~ 8-10 million people covered
Punjab Haryana Rajasthan Jammu Kashmir Himachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Uttranchal Sikkim Delhi Meghalaya
Assam Jibon Jyoti scheme launched in July 2005 aims to cover entire population of 30,000,000
A Utta B s i r J h s Nagaland Gujarat MadhyaPra Pradesh h a Manipur a des m a r West BengalMizoram h Tripura r Orissa k Maharashtra Chhattisgarh hAndhra Pradesh a Goa n Karnataka Karnataka d
Yashasvani
Assam
Andhra Andhra Pradesh aims PradeshArogyaSri -state to cover 86%
population
Kerala
Tamil NaduA & N Islands
Kerala
Kerala Katumb-shree launched in 2006 with ICICILombard for BPLs
Lakshadweep
Overview of the Case Studies..1-4
Case/ State SMS Hospital Jaipur, Rajasthan Arpana Swasthya Kendra, Delhi Uttaranchal Mobile Hospital and Research Centre, Bhimtal
Services Radiological (CT/MRI) Diagnostics/ Drugs & Medical Supplies store Management of Maternity health center under RCH Clinical diagnostic services through health camps, lab tests; Hilly people Super-specialty clinical and surgical services; Hospital Management
Benefits to the Poor Patients Free for all BPL Patients Free drugs (20% patients). Free Lab Tests, ANCs, select surgeries, community health services, sanitation, IEC Free to all BPL cardholders.
Rajiv Gandhi Hospital, Raichur Karnataka
40% beds are for BPL patients; Free OPD services to poor.
Overview of the Case Studies…..5-8
Case/ State Karuna Trust, Karnataka
Services Management of PHCs and sub-centers; 24-hrs clinical services
Benefits to the Poor Patients All patients given free servicesdiagnosis, consultation, treatment and drugs.
Karnataka Integrated Telemedicine & Telehealth
Yeshasvini Health Insurance Scheme Karnataka Rogi Kalyan Samiti, JP Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
Tele-diagnosis and consultation in cardiac care and specialist care
Hospitalization and care for more than 1600 surgeries
Free diagnosis, medicines and treatment for the BPL patients
Only for the members of farmers’ cooperatives and their dependents
Hospital autonomy- for Free to BPL patients, others pay decentralized management nominal user charges
Overview of the Case Studies…..9-12
Case/ State Emergency Ambulance, Theni, Tamil Nadu AP Urban Slum Health Project, Adilabad, Andhra Services 24-hrs ambulance for emergency deliveries & obstetrics care Maternity and child health services; Institutional deliveries Benefits to the Poor Patients 10% of the patients provided free transport. Services exclusively for slum population. All services free
Arogya Raksha Scheme, Andhra Pradesh
RNTCP, Mahavir Trust Hospital, Hyderabad, Andhra
Low cost health insurance, for limited hospitalization
Surveillance, treatment of TB patients& drug delivery under DOTS
Only for the BPL patients who undergo sterilization in a government hospital
Free for all patients
Overview of the Case Studies…..13-16
Case/ State Bhagajatin Hospital, Kolkata West Bengal Mobile (Boat) Health Service in Sunderbans, WB Shamlaji Hospital, Sabarkantha, Gujarat Chiranjeevi Yojana, Gujarat Services Outsourcing of Laundry, Kitchen, Cleaning Diagnostics; Consultationhealth clinics; Drugs; Health promotion Management of a government built CHC; 24hrs services Institutional deliveries through private obstetricians and gynecologists Benefits to the Poor Patients Food (diet) is free for BPL inpatients All services are supposed to be free; Beneficiary population is assumed to be BPL Except surgeries all services are free for poor patients
Scheme is primarily for women from poor families, with prior ANCs from a govt. hospital
WHY HEALTH INSURANCE?
Financial Exposure
End of life care Expenses
Medical expenses for Chronic conditions
Catastrophic Expenses
Consumer Financial Exposures
Unaffordable Risks
Expenses for routine medical expenses, preventive care
Income Risk
Key Actors
REGULATOR
Payor Private
Facilitator s
Low income households
Provider
Donor Agencies
Payer Public
WE WELCOME YOUR VIEWS-----
RAJNI SEKHRI SIBAL