Tables and activation maps for the ALE base

Document Sample
Tables and activation maps for the ALE base Powered By Docstoc
					                             Anticipatory affect:
               Neural correlates and consequences for choice
                           Supplementary Materials

                     Brian Knutson* and Stephanie M. Greer
                           Department of Psychology
                               Stanford University




S1. Activation table and figures for the four base contrasts

S2. Results of brain activation and self-reported affect correlations




*Contact:
Brian Knutson
Bldg. 420, Jordan Hall
Stanford CA 94305 USA
650 724 2965
knutson@psych.stanford.edu
         Table S1. Activation foci from separate activation likelihood estimate meta-
         analyses for each of the four base contrasts. Whole brain, p < .001 corrected.
         Cluster = 100 mm3

Gain vs. non-gain anticipation                                Gain vs. non-gain Outcome
                                                                                                  -3
Region                    ALE (x 10-3)    R        A     S    Region                    ALE (x 10 )    R        A        S
R NAcc                           93.8      10        8    2   R Caudate                         31.0     8       16        2
R Thalamus                       40.6        4     -10   12   R NAcc                            26.5    12       10       -6
L NAcc                         100.3      -12       10   -2   R Subcallosal Gyrus               22.0     8         2      -8
R Insula                         35.2      32       18    0   L Amygdala                        34.8   -16        -2     -10
L Thalamus                       24.5       -6     -22    6   L NAcc                            23.2    -8         6      -4
                                                              L Parahippocampal
L Thalamus                        23.7        -2   -22   10   Gyrus                             18.8   -18      -26       -4
                                                              R Parahippocampal
L Medial Frontal Gyrus            35.1       0      -2   48   Gyrus                             19.8       22   -22       -4
L Culmen                          25.2       0     -60   -6
Includes 20 studies with a total of 230 foci                  Includes 12 studies with a total of 119 foci
Loss vs. non-loss anticipation                                Loss vs. non-loss Outcome
                                                                                                  -3
Region                    ALE (x 10-3)    R        A     S    Region                    ALE (x 10 )    R        A        S
                                                              R Superior Temporal
R Caudate                         51.4      10      8     4   Gyrus                             18.4       54       -4       6
R Caudate                         21.5      12     -4    16
L Putamen                         57.2 -14         10     0
L Thalamus                        27.3 -12         -4    10
L Insula                          21.8 -36         14     0
L Insula                          20.7 -38         16     6
LThalamus                         20.7       0     -8    10
Includes 12 studies with a total of 87 foci                   Includes 6 studies with a total of 32 foci
    Table S2. Studies reporting significant and non-significant correlations activation
    in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), the medial caudate (MCaud) and the Insula
    and cue-elicited affect.

                        Large-gain (+$5.00) cue                      Large-loss (-$5.00) cue
               Positive Arousal        Negative Arousal     Positive Arousal         Negative Arousal
             NAcc MCaud Insula NAcc MCaud Insula          NAcc MCaud Insula NAcc MCaud Insula
 Knutson
              +         o          .       o   o    .       .      .       .      .       .       .
  2001a
   Bjork
              +         .          .       .   .    .       .      .       .      .       .       .
   2004
 Knutson
              +         .          .       .   .    .       .      .       .      o       .       .
   2004
 Knutson
              +         .          .       o   .    .       .      .       .      .       .       .
   2005
Samanez-
  Larkin      +         o          +       o   o   o       o       o       o      o       +      +
   2007
+: Reported a significant correlation
o : Reported a non-significant correlation
. : Reported nothing

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:3
posted:8/28/2011
language:English
pages:4