Docstoc

resume

Document Sample
resume Powered By Docstoc
					                                JOSEPH M. MANAK
                              Greenberg Traurig LLP
                                    Shareholder
                           Patents and Intellectual Property

                           685 West End Avenue, Apt. 2A
                                New York, NY 10025
                                 (212) 865 7144(h)
                                 (212) 801 2187 (o)
                                (917) 597 2667 (cell)
                            Email: manak@pipeline.com
                          Web address: www.patattorney.com

Joseph Manak is a shareholder in the law firm of Greenberg Traurig LLP, and is located
in the firm’s New York Office. Greenberg Traurig is a U.S.-based, international full-
service business law firm with more than 1100 attorneys and lobbyists in 20 offices.
Prior to joining Greenberg as a shareholder in 1999, Joe had been a salaried partner in
the New York office of Graham & James since 1997. The Graham & James New York
office merged with Greenberg Traurig in the summer of 2001.

Joe is an intellectual property attorney, litigator, and trial lawyer who concentrates in
patent, trade secret and related antitrust litigation. He focuses his practice in
biotechnology, pharmaceutical, electronics, chemical and software patent law and
litigation, and also specializes in patent interference practice. Joe has represented
some of the largest health care companies in patent infringement actions, Hatch-
Waxman patent challenges, patent interferences, and has litigated patent and IP cases
concerning recombinant DNA technology, organic chemistry, drug delivery systems,
electrical devices, drug metabolism, high-strength fibers, aerospace and defense,
medical devices, contact lenses and food science.

Joe also supervises and prepares and prosecutes software, Internet, chemical and
pharmaceutical patent applications, practices trademark, trade dress, copyright and
related antitrust and unfair competition law, and has experience in securities and
insurance litigation and arbitration.

On the transactional side, Joe conducts IP-related M&A due diligence, and negotiates
and drafts a variety of software and technology-based licenses, patent and know-how
agreements, research and development agreements, distribution and re-seller
contracts, and similar transactions.

Some of the reported matters that Mr. Manak has handled include:

Litigations:

       Abbot Laboratories v. Paddock/Par Pharmaceuticals
       Hatch Waxman patent litigation
Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Shanghai Meihao et al.
Mult-district electronics patent litigation

Novo Nordisk v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Civil Action No. 02-332-SLR
Patent Infringement action and district court appeal of USPTO interference

PE Corp. and Roche Molecular Systems v. MJ Research
Case No. 3-98-CV-1201
Patent infringement litigation involving polymerase chain reaction

Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Yatai USA LLC et al.
Multidistrict action involving ground fault circuit interrupters

University of Rochester v. Merck
Patent Interference No. 104,289 (U.S.P.T.O. 2001)
Represent Merck in patent interference related to discovery of Cox-2 gene and
protein.

Merck Frosst Canada v. Monsanto Company
Case No. 1:99 CV 02620 (Thomas Penfield Jackson)
Represent Merck in District Court action related to Cox-2 inhibitor VIOXX

Monsanto Corp. and G.D. Searle & Co. v. Merck Inc.
Interference Nos.103,873; 103845
Represented Merck in large scale patent interference involving
cycooxegenase II inhibitors, next generation anti-inflammatories

Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. Eli Lilly and Company and Genentech Inc.
Civ. Action No. 97-4848 (AET) (D. N.J.)
Represented Novo Nordisk in patent infringement litigation concerning
recombinant DNA production of Human Growth Hormone

Eli Lilly and Company v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al.
Civ. Action No. IP 97-1834 C (S.D. Indiana)
Represented Novo Nordisk in patent infringement and validity action involving
Human Growth Hormone formulation patent

Genentech Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S and Biotechnology General
Civ. Action Nos. 95 Civ. 3474, 94 Civ. 8634, 95 Civ. 0110, 94 Civ. 1755
(S.D.N.Y.), and Intern. Trade Comm’n.
Represented Novo Nordisk in multiple patent infringement, validity and
antitrust actions in Southern District of New York and International Trade
Commission concerning recombinant DNA production of Insulin and Human
Growth Hormone.



                                        2
Emory University v. Glaxo Wellcome PLC and Biochem Pharma Inc.
Civ. Action No. 1-96-CV 1868-GET (N.D.Ga.)
Represent Glaxo Wellcome in patent infringement and validity action brought
by Emory involving enantiomeric compounds and chiral chemistry related to
AIDs drug Epivir.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Femminella et al.
Civ. Action No. 96 Civ. 336 (S.D.N.Y.)
Represented defendant in SEC enforcement action for securities fraud
relating to bond trading.

Grumman Aerospace Corporation v. TechMatics et al.
95 Civ. 966 (Platt) E.D.NY.
Represented Northrop Grumman in trade secret and unfair competition claim
against former employees concerning aerospace and automotive technology.

Marion Merrell Dow Inc. et al. v. Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
94 Civ. 1245 (Moreno) S.D. Fla.
Represented Marion Merrell Dow Inc. (now Aventis) in action concerning the
antihistamine Seldane® against generic drug manufacturers under Hatch-
Waxman Act.

Alpex Computer Corp. v. Nintendo Company Ltd. et al.
86 Civ. 1749 (KMW) S.D.N.Y.
Assisted Honorable Kimba M. Wood, U.S.D.J., and Special Master Thomas
L. Creel in trial on infringement of Alpex patent relating to computer video
games.

Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Allied-Signal Inc.
Civil Action No. 3:92CV66-MU, W.D.N.C.
Represented Allied-Signal in patent and antitrust action relating to industrial
fibers.

The Pretesting Company v. The Arbitron Company
93 Civ. 6031 (CBM) S.D.N.Y.
Represented Arbitron Co. in defense of patent, unfair competition and false
advertising action concerning automated television audience survey system.

Wesley-Jessen Corporation v. Ciba Vision Corporation
Civil Action No. 90-SLR (SLR), D. Del.
Represented Ciba-Geigy in patent action and antitrust concerning color
contact lenses.

Baxter Healthcare Corporation et al. v. Acufex Microsurgical, Inc., Civil Action
No. 88-408 JSL (RWRx), N.D. Cal./D. Mass.



                                    3
      Represented Acufex division of American Cyanamid Co. in patent action
      concerning arthroscopic surgical equipment.

      In re Nifedipine Capsule Patent Litigation,
      MDL 774 M21-51 (JFK), Multi-district.
      Represented Pfizer Inc. and Bayer AG in multiple actions concerning the
      cardiovascular drug Procardia® against generic drug manufacturers under
      Hatch-Waxman Act.

      American Cyanamid Co. v. Ethicon, Inc.
      Civil Action No. 85-3053 (JCL), D.N.J.
      Represented American Cyanamid Co. in action against Ethicon (J&J) under
      35 USC § 146 concerning priority of surgical suture invention.

      Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc. et al.
      Civ. Action No. 84-333 LON, D. Del. 697 F. Supp. 1360 (D. Del. 1988). The
      "Cookie Wars": see Wall Street Journal, Sept. 11, 1989 and U.S. News &
      World Report, Sept. 25, 1989.
      Represented P&G in large-scale trade secret misappropriation, industrial
      espionage, patent and unfair competition suit concerning P&G's invention of
      storageable crispy/chewy cookies.

      Foreign Exchange and Investment Ltd. v. Ideal Consolidators,
      Civ. Nos. 91-2334 (MTB); 91-2335 (AJL) D.N.J.
      Represented Hong Kong investment bank in action to enforce negotiable
      instruments against warehouses and shippers for fraud and diversion of
      goods shipped from Far East.

      United States v. Marine Shale Processors.
      Represented Marine Shale in action brought by the U.S. government (EPA)
      under environmental laws regarding waste facility in Louisiana.

      Sky Chefs, Inc. v. Delaware North Companies Inc.
      Represented Sky Chefs in dispute arising out of leveraged-buyout relating to
      the purchase of airline concession assets.

Transactions:

      Indian Generic Pharma Cos.
      Asset sales and stock transactions in acquisitions of U.S. generic cos.

      Bentley Pharmaceuticals
      IPO

      Ziff-Davis Interchange®/Private Bidder



                                         4
      Represented European communication company in bid for MultiMedia
      software business.

      Eastman Kodak Company/Sterling Drug Co.
      Represented international pharmaceutical company in bids to purchase
      Kodak's Sterling Drug Co. and diagnostic business.

      Sivensa S.A./FIOR
      Representation of Venezuelan industrial company in various trade secret,
      trademark, technology transfer and patent matters.

      Engelhard Inc./Degussa Corporation and Degussa AG.
      Represented Degussa in negotiations regarding proposed sale and licensing
      of Engelhard's world-wide precious metals businesses.

      IBM/Commodore International Ltd.
      Represented Commodore in negotiations concerning IBM hardware and
      software licenses relating to personal computer technology.

OTHER LEGAL EXPERIENCE:

1988 to     KAYE, SCHOLER, FIERMAN, HAYS & HANDLER
1996        New York, New York
            Associate - Litigation Dept. Technology--Patent Group

            Litigation and Counseling:

            Federal and State Court litigation and counseling in Intellectual Property,
            Antitrust, Unfair Competition, False Advertising and Commercial matters.

            Extensive experience in complex patent and technology litigation,
            including responsibility for running day-to-day aspects of patent cases,
            taking and defending of depositions, drafting briefs, arguing motions,
            witness interviews and preparation, fact investigations, expert witness
            selection and preparation, settlement negotiations and agreements, trial
            and mini-trial preparation, advise and counseling, patent infringement and
            validity opinions.

            Patent and Antitrust experience emphasized large-scale patent litigation
            and counseling for Fortune 500 companies in various industries:
            aerospace, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, medical devices, fibers,
            chemicals, computers and electronics. Provide numerous consultations
            regarding marketing and licensing proprietary products and processes
            under antitrust and misuse laws governing tie-ins, exclusive dealing and
            royalty terms.




                                          5
          Other Intellectual Property experience included patent and trademark
          prosecution; litigation and counseling involving software copyrights and
          patents, trade secrets, trademarks, service marks and false advertising
          claims.

          General practice litigation includes actions involving the Uniform
          Commercial Code and related banking regulations, Shipping and
          Admiralty, environmental laws, breach of representations and warranties
          and breach of contract.

          Licensing and Acquisitions:
          Numerous acquisition, licensing and technology transfer matters in
          complex transactions and straight licensing arrangements.

          •     Assisted in negotiating and structuring numerous technology,
                intellectual property and non-compete transactions.

          •     Experienced in drafting numerous technology and IP contracts,
                including acquisition agreements, software agreements; patent,
                know-how, copyright and trademark licenses.

          •     Conducted      due    diligence    and    advised     intellectual
                property/licensing aspects of deal for potential buyer of on-line
                MultiMedia business.

          •     Due diligence and negotiations for potential buyer/licensor of
                worldwide technology assets of precious metals business.

1986-88   MORGAN & FINNEGAN
          345 Park Avenue, New York, New York
          Litigation Associate, 1986-1988
          (Summer Associate, 1985)

          Litigation and counseling in intellectual property (copyright, patent,
          trade secret, biotechnology, trademark, gray-market and counterfeiting)
          and unfair competition cases. Drafted briefs, legal memoranda and
          opinion letters, interrogatories, assisted in depositions, document
          productions and trial preparation.

                •      Representation of Procter and Gamble in P & G v.
                Nabisco et al., a large-scale industrial espionage, trade secret
                and patent infringement litigation that resulted in a $125 MM
                settlement award to P&G in 1989.

                •     Prosecution of biotechnology and chemical patent
                applications; trademark applications.



                                      6
EDUCATION

            NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL
            New York, New York
            Juris Doctor, cum laude, June, 1986
            Class Rank: Top 15%
            G.P.A.: 3.25
            Honors: Journal of International and Comparative Law

            MANHATTAN COLLEGE
            Riverdale, New York
            Bachelor of Science, 1983
            Major: Chemistry
            G.P.A.: 3.2
            Honors: Dean's List, 1981 and 1982; American Chemical
            Society Certification; New York State Regent's Scholarship

LECTURES AND PUBLICATIONS

      "The Law of Written Description in Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology
      Patents," 23 Biotechnology Law Report 30, Number 1 (February 2004).

      “Toward Consistency and Clarity in Patent Claim Construction: Markman,
      Hilton Davis, Southwall, and Vitronics” Amer. Bar Ass’n IPL Newsletter, Vol.
      15, No. 2 Winter 1997.

      “Decisions Key to Safe Licensing,” Les Nouvelles, J.Lic. Exec. Soc. Vol. XXXI
      No. 1, March 1996.

      “Confusion in the Law of Patent Infringement: The Federal Circuit’s Decisions
      in Markman and Hilton Davis,” BIOTECH Patent News, vol. 9 No. 10, October
      1995.

      "Federal Circuit Telectronics and Chartex Decisions Clarify Infringement
      Exemption For FDA Uses," BIOTECH Patent News, vol. 7, no. 9, September
      1993.

      Licensing Executives Society
      1992 Annual Meeting -- Boca Raton, Florida
      Workshop Leader: Licensing and the Law of Tie-ins

      Columbia University School of Law
      1989-1990 Korean Legal Studies Program In International Trade
      Lecturer: weekly lectures on licensing, copyright and trademark law given to
      Korean lawyers and government officials.

BAR


                                         7
ADMISSIONS

    New York State, March 1987

    United States District Courts:
     Southern District of New York
     Eastern District of New York

    United States Patent and Trademark Office, June 1988 (Registration No.
    33,013)

BAR ASSOCIATIONS

    AIPPI
    1998

    Association of the Bar of the City of New York
    1993-present Computer Law Committee
    1994 Software Protection Subcommittee

    Controlled Release Society
    1998 to present

    Licensing Executives Society
    1991 Work Shop Committee
    1990 Legal Affairs Committee
    2004 Membership Committee

    New York Intellectual Property Law Association
    1994 Judge's Dinner Committee
    1993 Antitrust and Misuse Committee
    1990 Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee

LANGUAGES

    French

COMPUTER SKILLS

    Programming: courses in JAVA, FORTRAN, BASIC, COBOL and PASCAL.
    Applications: Word-Perfect, Microsoft Word, Access, Quicken, Lotus 1-2-3,
    Harvard Graphics, Netscape, Corel Draw, LEXIS-NEXIS, and WESTLAW.


    614879




                                       8

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:24
posted:8/26/2011
language:German
pages:8