Docstoc

Earle v Centrica.pub

Document Sample
Earle v Centrica.pub Powered By Docstoc
					Earle v Centrica plc
Martin Cox of DLA Piper's Costs Unit recently acted on                                                their profit costs by delegating matters which would normally
behalf of the defendant in the case of Earle v Centrica plc in                                        be viewed as solicitors' work to third parties who could claim
which he successfully challenged the cost of the claimant's                                           as disbursements that which the solicitor would normally
medical expert and agency fees.                                                                       have been expected to perform within the predictable fee
                                                                                                      structure. Any doubt as to reasonableness had to be
In this case the claimant sought payment of a disputed
                                                                                                      resolved in favour of the paying party. The claimant was
amount of costs after the settlement of a personal injury
                                                                                                      only entitled to recover the record production fee of £50 and
claim. The claimant sustained injuries and consequential
                                                                                                      the medical expert's fee of £285, Stringer -v- Copley and
loss as a result of a road traffic incident for which the
                                                                                                      Claims Direct Test Cases Tranche 2 Issues, Re considered.
defendant was to blame. The claimant's solicitors gave
notice of the claim and settled it for £3,850 in general and                                          Details of medical experts direct fees are available to
special damages together with costs sought at £2,422.10 but                                           subscribers and authorised users on our Internet based
paid only as to £1,907.72. The defendant's insurers                                                   Medical Experts Database Service (MEDS). If you have any
challenged the quantum of the medical expert and agency                                               queries about the use of MEDS please contact Alan Jacobs,
fees and sought clarification before paying what they                                                 Partner in DLA Piper's Insurance Group on alan.
contended was proper. The claimant issued proceedings for                                             jacobs@dlapiper.com or at +44 (0)121 262 5743.
the balance of the costs of £514.38. The claimant was
                                                                                                      If you would like further advice in connection with any of the
entitled to recover costs and disbursements to be calculated
                                                                                                      issues raised in this case, please contact Martin Cox in DLA
in accordance with CPR Part 45 (II) (Road traffic accidents -
                                                                                                      Piper’s Insurance Group Costs Unit on martin.cox@dlapiper.
fixed recoverable costs). The disputed disbursements
                                                                                                      com or at +44 (0)114 283 3413.
consisted of an invoice from MDL Medical Administration Ltd
for £25 (plus VAT of £4.38), a GP note release charge of
£50, and an invoice for £435 for the expert's report. The                                             This document was previously published in October 2005
claimant contended that the use of medical agencies served                                            under the company name DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary UK
to streamline litigation and was a moderating influence on                                            LLP.
medical fees.
Held: There was no principle which precluded the fees of a
medical agency being recoverable between the parties,
provided it was demonstrated that its charges did not exceed
the reasonable and proportionate costs of the work if it had
been done by solicitors. The agency fees could not be
charged as though the work had been done by the solicitors
since the expert's fee had to be a disbursement. The
agreement between the agency and the expert provided for a
fee of £285. The rules were designed to deliver a moderate
and predictable scheme of costs. There was an obvious risk
that solicitors would seek to circumvent the restrictions on


The matters covered in this publication are intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. They are not
intended, and should not be used, as a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper UK LLP will accept no
responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. If you would like further advice, please contact Alan Jacobs
or Martin Cox on 08700 111 111.




                                                                                                      Regulated by the Law Society
                                                                                                      DLA Piper UK LLP and DLA Piper Scotland LLP are part of DLA Piper, a global legal
                                                                                                      services organisation, the members of which are separate and distinct legal entities.
                                                                                                      For further information please refer to www.dlapiper.com/structure
                                                                                                      A list of offices can be found at www.dlapiper.com
                                                                                                      UK switchboard +44 (0) 8700 111 111

                                                                                                      MANDP Ref: BD/Earle v Centrica plc

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:8
posted:8/24/2011
language:English
pages:1