VIEWS: 8 PAGES: 2 POSTED ON: 8/22/2011
22-23 October 2001, Arendal Workshop on Communicating Environmental Information Evaluation form Dear workshop participants, in order for us to evaluate this workshop, listen to your comments and suggestions, and be able to deliver a better training next time, we would much appreciate if you fill out the evaluation form below. Please do not hesitate to also report the negative points, that is the only way we can improve! GRID-Arendal staff guest Please tick off: 1 = not very good/ useful, 2 = OK, 3 = very good/ useful 1 2 3 Score* why? / comments 0 4 8 2,6 (-)Short time, no breaks Introductory and in-between Too much info, hard to digest, no qu-s and presentations discussion (+) informative, useful framework 1 8 4 2,24 (-) hard for guests Case study 1 (Arendal (+) relevant, good to feel difficulties transport) 4 10 2,73 Limited direct relevance to GA work Case studies 2 (global issues) * several people gave multiple answers What did you like most? Why? facilitators, high level of participation, case 1, case 2, introductory, bazaar, concrete examples Right mix of theory & practice, interactivity, group work What did you like least? Why? Time pressure Measuring impact theory – fuzzy, hard to apply Will you be able to use the results in your work? How? Yes, in project development 1 2 3 Score* why? How was the workshop altogether? 0 5 9 2,73 Learning by doing, good break from routine * several people gave multiple answers What would you have done differently? Cut on media, focus on other channels Bazaar longer More GA-related cases Start with unsolved real world problem Give more time for interaction with facilitators Make less tough schedule (3 days) Other comments, things you would like to mention, critiques: Workshop was good, intense, hands-on and relevant Thank you very much!
Pages to are hidden for
"STAFF 22 23 October 2001"Please download to view full document