XLS T11 DPANS FC FS 3

Document Sample
XLS T11 DPANS FC FS 3 Powered By Docstoc
					                                                                                   DPANS FC-FS-3 version 0.90 (T11/09-112v2) letter ballot comment resolution - 091110
                                                                                                                 Consolidated comment and resolution status
                                                 See key and summary at end




                                    Locator
Comment                             (e.g.,
number                              section or                                                                                                                 O/A/                                                                                                         blank or
(required for               Printed table or                                                                                                                   R/W                                                                                                          N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E         Page # figure #)     Comment                                                                    Proposed Resolution                /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                   version
                                                 This is a sample line. To add automatically summarized comment
                                                 lines:

                                                 1) insert empty lines between here and the required last row;

                                                 2) copy the formulas from the end of this line to the end of each
                                                 inserted line to enable counting by type;

                                                 3) enter each comment with a comment number, printed page number,
                                                 and a locator (e.g., subclause and paragraph count); and

                                                 4) if desired, indicate whether you consider the comment technical or
                                                 editorial, and/or offer a proposed resolution.

                                                 The remaining fields will be filled by work group agreement.

                                                 To sort, select only the rows between but not including here to the
                                                 required last line.

Emulex-003      T       4           2.3          In 2.3, at least two of the references under development are now           Update the references in            A   Update the references in subclauses 2.2 and 2.3 of the final T11 draft. Updates include FC-PI-3, FC-    0.92
                                                 published. Others may be before FC-FS-3 is forwarded.                      subclauses 2.2 and 2.3 of the           SATA, and SAM-4, and may include FC-BB-5, FC-GS-6, FC-LS-2, FC-SW-5, and FCP-4
                                                                                                                            final T11 draft. Updates include
                                                                                                                            FC-PI-3, FC-SATA, and SAM-4,
                                                                                                                            and may include FC-BB-5, FC-
                                                                                                                            GS-6, FC-LS-2, FC-SW-5, and
                                                                                                                            FCP-4
Emulex-012      T       22          3.5.11       Historical discrepancy in treatment of a reserved field:                   Free-for-all, though we could still O   In 3.5.11, change "Recipients are not required to check reserved bits, bytes, words or fields
                                                                                                                            fix FC-LS-2's conflict.                 for zero values." to "Recipients should not check reserved bits, bytes, words or fields
                                                 In FC-PH, reserved was defined in the glossary, and it was suggested                                               for zero values."
                                                 non-normatively to ignore it on receipt. Other standards used it without
                                                 definition (e.g., FC-GS-2).                                                                                        Those who find reason to object should open their issue by the end of the December 2009 meeting.

                                                 Sometime before the current millenium, keywords began to appear in
                                                 the editorial conventions. In these, checking the value in a reserved
                                                 field was changed to a prohibition (e.g., FC-GS-3, FC-SW-2).

                                                 But not long afterward, the keywords subclause appeared, and when it
                                                 did, checking of values in reserved fields became "not require", which
                                                 is easily interpreted as "may" (e.g., FC-FS).

                                                 One could simply say "that's how we decided to do it, so live with it",
                                                 except some very recent standards have placed the prohibition in the
                                                 keywords subclause (e.g., FC-SB-4), and some have the permissive
                                                 checking in their keywords subclause, and still have the probition in
                                                 their editorial conventions clause ☺ (e.g., FC-LS-2, FC-GS-6).

                                                 So, is it to be a free-for-all?


Cisco-004           T        34       Figure 8   F_Port should be PF_Port                                                   as suggested                      A     The change is needed in the figure, the figure legend, and the introductory paragraph to the figure.    0.92
Emulex-016      T       41          5.2.1        "An FC-0 standard (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the use of the 8B/10B        re-word to "An FC-0 standard      A     At the end of 5.1 (Overview of Transmission codes), add the paragraph:                                  0.92
                                                 transmission code as its frame transfer transmission code." should we      (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the
                                                 specify a default for FC-0 standards that were written before there        use of a transmission code as its       An FC-0 standard for a physical variant may specify a transmission code. If an FC-0 standard for a
                                                 were multiple transmission codes?                                          frame transfer transmission             physical variant does not specify a transmission code, then the physical variant shall use the 8B/10B
                                                                                                                            code. If the FC-0 standard does         transmission code (see 5.2).
                                                                                                                            not specify a transmission code
                                                                                                                            or specifies the use of 8B/10B
                                                                                                                            transmission code, then it shall
                                                                                                                            conform to 5.2.
Emulex-019      T       49          5.2.6        Resolve editor's note at bottom of page                                                                      A     Remove the note.                                                                                        0.92
Cisco-006           T        66       Table 13   The modifier byte 1 of SOFf should be B5h, not 95h.                        as suggested                      A     As recommended                                                                                          0.92
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                                                        O/A/                                                                                                             blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                                                          R/W                                                                                                              N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E      Page # figure #)    Comment                                                                        Proposed Resolution                   /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                       version
Emulex-028      T     68        5.4.1        In the last sentence of the second paragraph of 5.4.1 is the top-level         In the last sentence of the           A    As recommended                                                                                              0.92
                                             definition of the Transmitter Training Signal. It sure looks like it needs a   second paragraph of 5.4.1,
                                             "shall".                                                                       change "The Transmitter Training
                                                                                                                            Signal is a repeating series..." to
                                                                                                                            "The Transmitter Training Signal
                                                                                                                            shall be a repeating series..."

Emulex-030      T     70        5.4.2        The last sentence of the first paragraph after figure 25 describes the    Change the last sentence of the A              As recommended                                                                                               0.92
                                             order of bit transmission in a Training Frame. It is not normative.       first paragraph after figure 25
                                                                                                                       from "The information in these
                                                                                                                       fields is transmitted..." to "The
                                                                                                                       information in these fields shall
                                                                                                                       be transmitted...".
Brocade-003     T     72        Table 17     Bit 14 is defined as TF for transmitter fixed, but the bit is mainly used See document 09- for a complete O              document is 09-519v0, but in addition to what is in 09-519v0, also delete the fifth regular paragraph of
                                             to signal that speed negotiation is complete. We should rename this       explanation of the solution and                9.2 (i.e., "An FC_Port that does not support training of transmitter equalizer coefficients...").
                                             bit to be Speed Negotiation Active to prevent the deadlock condition of suggested changes.
                                             when a port is not training or doing FEC. Bit 12 should be assigned to
                                             transmitter fixed bit to accomodate the intended use of the bit.

Emulex-031      T     72        5.4.3        The first paragraph of 5.4.3 contains the only definition of the Training In the first paragraph of 5.4.3,   A           As recommended                                                                                               0.92
                                             Pattern. It has no normative statements.                                  change "The Training Pattern is
                                                                                                                       composed of..." to "The Training
                                                                                                                       Pattern shall be composed of...",
                                                                                                                       and change "PRBS-11 (see
                                                                                                                       figure 26) is the output…" to
                                                                                                                       "PRBS-11 (see figure 26) shall
                                                                                                                       be the output…".
Emulex-032      T     78        6.3.4.2      In 6.3.4.2 is the only description of Loss-of-Signal in FC-FS-3. It lacks Delete subclause 6.3.4.2. Add a A              As recommended                                                                                               0.92
                                             both detail and reference, and is now in a subclause limited to 8B/10B. paragraph at the end of 6.2:
                                             It needs to be independent of transmission code, and needs to
                                             reference FC-PI-x.                                                        A receiver may provide an
                                                                                                                       indication of a Loss-of-Signal
                                                                                                                       condition (see FC-PI_x).
Brocade-008     T     81        6.4.2        We expect 8GFC links to be able to synchronize on 16GFC encoded Change: "If the link speed                   A           In 8.6.1 second item a, change                                                                               0.92
                                             patterns during speed negotiation, even though the received data is       negotiation algorithm (see 8.6) is
                                             junk. This is not a desired behavior.                                     performed using 64B/66B, then                  Counting of code violations may be used for the monitoring period to insure robustness, if available to
                                                                                                                       the pass sync_test count                       the firmware. If counted, the number of errors allowed shall be zero. If the number of errors is not zero,
                                                                                                                       shall be 1 000." to "If the link               then Transmission Word synchronization (Pass sync_test decision blocks) is not considered to have
                                                                                                                       speed negotiation algorithm (see               occurred and a different speed is negotiated or the algorithm does not converge;
                                                                                                                       8.6) is performed using 64B/66B,
                                                                                                                       then the pass sync_test count                  to
                                                                                                                       shall be 1 000. Simulations have
                                                                                                                       shown that a 64B/66B PCS may                   Counting of code violations may be used for the monitoring period to insure robustness, if available to
                                                                                                                       lock on an 8B/10B signal, so the               the firmware. If 64B/66B tranmission code is used, then code violations shall be counted for the
                                                                                                                       received data shall be validated               monitoring period. If counted, then the number of errors allowed shall be zero. If the number of errors is
                                                                                                                       before synchronization is                      not zero, then Transmission Word synchronization (Pass sync_test decision blocks) is not considered to
                                                                                                                       complete."                                     have occurred and a different speed is negotiated or the algorithm does not converge;

LSI-001         T     81        6.4.2        For 16GFC speed negotiation add the following note;                                                                  A   see Brocade-008                                                                                              0.92
                                             NOTE: Recommend check for not data error along with block-lock at
                                             16GFC. 16GFC block-lock likely with 8b10b 8GFC data.

                                             16GFC Block-Lock on 8GFC data is something observed by a few
                                             other companies during debug of RTL.
                                             - 16GFC serial 64-bit data is exactly double 8GFC serial 10-bit data.
                                             - All that is required is the data 4’b0011 or 4’b1100 occur every 66-bits.
                                             Seems it is not difficult for 10-bit encoded data and certain data
                                             patterns used during speed negotiation.

Emulex-049      T     102       8.6.4        In the list at the end of 8.6.4, item c requires a transition to a state that In the list at the end of 8.6.4, A         As recommended                                                                                               0.92
                                             no longer exists.                                                             change "After t_stbl, the Port
                                                                                                                           moves to state 40" to "After
                                                                                                                           t_stbl, the Port returns to the
                                                                                                                           FC_Port state machine (see 7.2)
                                                                                                                           indicating successful Speed
                                                                                                                           Negotiation".
Avago-001       T     107       9.2          Three Eq TAP controls in Transmitter Training have been previously                                             W         Withdrawn by request of commenting organization                                                              N/A
                                             discussed, but there was also some discussion of a five tap TX EQ on
                                             the Electrical side. (if that's true, then the 5 tap controls should be
                                             added back in.
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                                                    O/A/                                                                                                          blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                                                      R/W                                                                                                           N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E     Page # figure #)     Comment                                                                    Proposed Resolution                   /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                    version
Avago-002       T     108       9.3.2        Transmitter training of 500ms - 510ms is not sufficient for 16GFC.         Change Transmitter training to        A    In 9.3.2 change the range for train_fail_timer from "between 500 ms and 510 ms" to "between 1 s and      0.92
                                             14Gbps signals requires more complex tuning algorithms than                minimum of 1sec or ideally 3sec            1.5 s"
                                             10GBASE-KR.                                                                instead (proposed resoluption
                                                                                                                        added by request of commenting
                                             (Comment changed by request of commenting organization. Was:               organization)
                                             Transmitter Training is 500-510ms, which for a p6 DFE most likely
                                             won't be sufficient.)
Brocade-006     T     108       9.3.2        The link_test_timer is currently set from 640uS to 960uS. The upper        Change the "960 uS" to "30 mS" O           As suggested. But in a T11.2/T11.3 16GFC Protocol meeting, an additional change to the range was
                                             limit of this timer does not allow enough time for software-based          to enable software                         advised. See T11/09-519v2.
                                             implementations in large port count devices to be enabled. This is a       implementations.
                                             one-pass timer, so extending the time for software based applications
                                             would not significantly enlarge the test time.




Emulex-062      T     113       9.3.4.2.1    The Train_Init state will time out if the peer device does not negotiate   In 7.2 figure 28, change the text O        See Brocade-003.
                                             to do either transmitter training or FEC. Be careful, the suggested        in the decision box for transmitter
                                             resolution may in part conflict with another comment that is expected.     training from "transmitter training
                                                                                                                        or FEC supported?" to
                                                                                                                        "negotiated or configured for
                                                                                                                        training signal?"

                                                                                                                        In the fifth regular paragraph of
                                                                                                                        9.2 (i.e., "An FC_Port that does
                                                                                                                        not support training of transmitter
                                                                                                                        equalizer coefficients..."), delete
                                                                                                                        ", but does not set to zero the TF
                                                                                                                        bit in the Status field of any
                                                                                                                        Training Frame".

                                                                                                                        After the sixth regular paragraph
                                                                                                                        of 9.2 (i.e., "Training of
                                                                                                                        transmitter equalizer coefficients
                                                                                                                        is based on...") add the new
                                                                                                                        paragraph:

                                                                                                                        An FC_Port that does not
                                                                                                                        support training of transmitter
                                                                                                                        equalizer coefficients and uses
                                                                                                                        the Transmitter Training Signal
                                                                                                                        should respond to training
                                                                                                                        requests as though the minimum
                                                                                                                        value, maximum value, default
                                                                                                                        value, and preset value were all
                                                                                                                        the same as the current value for
                                                                                                                        each of its coefficients.

Brocade-007     T     121       9.3.7.2.1    The second action to do while remaining in the Link_Test state says to     The test is not actually named        R    The IEEE state machine, referenced by the specification of FC synchronization, for high bit error rate is N/A
                                             determine if Transmission Word Synchronization is indicated. This is       though, so we should copy the              based on a window of testing, not a point measurement. The current minimum link wait timeout allows for
                                             different from the other synchronization tests to leave speed              text from page 94 or find a good           multiple of these windows in addition to signal stabilization.
                                             negotiation and thus causes different logic to get into normal             way to reference it.
                                             operation. We would prefer to do the pass sync test as defined in
                                             6.4.2.
Emulex-074      T     147       11.8.10      The first paragraph of 11.8.10 leaves it unclear what should be the        I don't know                          O    Unless the commenter provides understandable details, the comment will be rejected.
                                             setting of the abort sequence bits in in Class 3 frames subsequent to
                                             the first frame of the Exchange. This goes back to FC-PH-3. Before                                                    Commenter has offered T11/09-617v0.
                                             that, the field in question was ignored in all classes of service.

Emulex-075      T     147       11.8.10      The last sentence of the first paragraph of 11.8.10, introduced in FC-     I don't know.                         O    Unless the commenter provides understandable details, the comment will be rejected.
                                             PH-3, mystifies me. It seems to suggest that Class 3 frames
                                             subsequent to the first frame of an Exchange may be usable. Even in                                                   Commenter has offered T11/09-617v0.
                                             Process policy, though, the OX_ID would be unknown, and should
                                             lead to discard...shouldn't it? And if the policy is not Process, it
                                             suggests the field may need to be set properly for frames other than
                                             the first one in the Exchange.
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                                                      O/A/                                                                                                                 blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                                                        R/W                                                                                                                  N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E     Page # figure #)     Comment                                                                     Proposed Resolution                    /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                           version
Emulex-095      T     271       21.5.3.2     The first paragraph of 21.5.3.2 appears to reverse the expected events      In 21.5.3.2, change the first          A    As recommended.                                                                                                 0.92
                                             for the Sequence Initiator and the Sequence Responder. It also uses         three sentences of the first
                                             the wrong terminology for these entities.                                   paragraph from

                                                                                                                         Both the Sequence Initiator and
                                                                                                                         the Sequence Recipient use a
                                                                                                                         timer facility with a timeout period
                                                                                                                         (E_D_TOV) between expected
                                                                                                                         events. The expected event for
                                                                                                                         the Responder to Data frame
                                                                                                                         transmission is an ACK
                                                                                                                         response. The expected event
                                                                                                                         for the Initiator is another Data
                                                                                                                         frame for the same Sequence
                                                                                                                         that is active and incomplete.

                                                                                                                         to

                                                                                                                         Both the Sequence Initiator and
                                                                                                                         the Sequence Recipient use a
                                                                                                                         timer facility with a timeout period
                                                                                                                         (E_D_TOV) between expected
                                                                                                                         events. The expected event for
                                                                                                                         the Sequence Initiator to Data
                                                                                                                         frame transmission is an ACK
                                                                                                                         response. The expected event
                                                                                                                         for the Sequence Recipient is
                                                                                                                         another Data frame for the same
                                                                                                                         Sequence that is active and not
                                                                                                                         completed.

Emulex-098      T     278       21.6.2       item 2 of ordered list "P_RJT" should be class dependent                    Note P_RJT is class 2, and in      A       Change item 2 to                                                                                                 0.92
                                                                                                                         class 3 the frame is just dropped.
                                                                                                                                                                    If a valid Data frame (see 10.3.9.2) is received that contains information in the Frame_Header that is
                                                                                                                                                                    invalid or incorrect, then:

                                                                                                                                                                    a) in Class 2, a P_RJT frame shall be transmitted with the appropriate reason code as specified in
                                                                                                                                                                    14.3.3.4. Reason codes are defined such that the first error detected is returned as the reason code; and
                                                                                                                                                                    b) in any Class of Service, the received frame shall be discarded and R_RDY shall be transmitted in
                                                                                                                                                                    response to the discarded frame;

Emulex-099      T     347       G.4.3        In G.4.3, given that the time "for FC-PI-x settling" is now a variable, the in G.4.3, change the pair of          A    In G.4.1 second item a, append (see Table 20)                                                                    0.92
                                             derivation of t_txcycl is wrong (though we carefully assured that the       formulas in G.4.3 to
                                             answer doesn't change ☺                                                                                                Change the pair of formulas in G.4.3 to
                                                                                                                         = 5 * (t_rxcycl (max) + n * (100
                                                                                                                         μs) + (Transmitter Stabilization           = 5 * (t_rxcycl (max) + n * (100 μs)) + (Transmitter Stabilization Time) + margin
                                                                                                                         Time) + margin                             = 5 * (30.2 ms - .2 * (Transmitter Stabilization Time) + 5 * (100 μs)) + (Transmitter Stabilization Time) + .5
                                                                                                                         = 5 * (30.2 ms - .2 * (Transmitter         ms
                                                                                                                         Stabilization Time) + 5 * (100 μs) +       = 151 ms - (Transmitter Stabilization Time) + 2500 μs + (Transmitter Stabilization Time) + .5 ms
                                                                                                                         (Transmitter Stabilization Time) + .5      = 154 ms
                                                                                                                         ms
                                                                                                                         = 151 ms - (Transmitter Stabilization
                                                                                                                         Time) + 2500 μs + (Transmitter
                                                                                                                         Stabilization Time) + .5 ms
                                                                                                                         = 154 ms
Emulex-002      E     1         1            Our audience would probably benefit from a list of obsoleted features,      Editor to bring in a proposal.         O   Editor recommends the resolution documented in T11/09-613v0
                                             as is provided by FC-GS-6
Emulex-004      E     10        3.1.81       The word "fibre", with or without capitailzation but without being          Add a properly alphabetized and A          Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                      0.92
                                             followed by "Channel", appears several times in FC-FS-3. It appears         formatted definition of "fibre"
                                             first in the definition of "link". "fibre" is never defined.                (lower case):

                                                                                                                         fibre: a unidirectional data
                                                                                                                         communication medium used in
                                                                                                                         a manner compliant with FC-PI-x
                                                                                                                         or FC-AL-2.

                                                                                                                         Globally, change all occurences
                                                                                                                         of "Fibre" not followed by
                                                                                                                         "Channel" to lower case.
                                  Locator
Comment                           (e.g.,
number                            section or                                                                                                                     O/A/                                                                                                              blank or
(required for             Printed table or                                                                                                                       R/W                                                                                                               N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E        Page # figure #)    Comment                                                                    Proposed Resolution                    /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                        version
Emulex-005      E       10        3.1.65       what is meant by "further" in "Forward Error Correction (FEC): A further change to "Forward Error                 A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
                                               encoding of a stream of 64B/66B Transmission"                              Correction (FEC): An encoding of
                                                                                                                          a stream of 64B/66B
                                                                                                                          Transmission
Emulex-006      E       10        3.1.63       Fill word is used prolifically; however, it is very hard to find where the add definition: Fill Word: a       A        Add a definition                                                                                             0.92
                                               definition of the fill word primitive is                                   special function transmitted when
                                                                                                                          no frames or other Special                  Fill Word: a special function transmitted when no frames or other Special Functions are being transmitted
                                                                                                                          Functions are being transmitted,            (see 10.3.2).
                                                                                                                          the Fill Word for 8b/10b is IDLE
                                                                                                                          or ARBff (see 10.3.5) and the Fill          and change the last sentence of 10.3.2 from
                                                                                                                          Word for 64B/66B is IDLE (see
                                                                                                                          5.3.7.2)                                    Valid Fill Words depend on the transmission code (see 5), the topology (see FC-AL-2), and other factors
                                                                                                                          Alternatively, add the specific             (e.g., see 10.3.5).
                                                                                                                          special functions used as fill
                                                                                                                          words in 10.3.4 and just point the          to
                                                                                                                          definition to 10.3.4.
                                                                                                                                                                      Valid Fill Words depend on the transmission code (see 5.2.1 and 5.3.7.2) and the topology (see FC-AL-
                                                                                                                                                                      2) .
Emulex-007      E       13        3.1.122      "synchronization was been achieved" is poor grammar                          change to "synchronization was A          Accept proposed resolution.                                                                           0.92
                                                                                                                            achieved"
Emulex-008      E       14        3.1.134      "Special Function: A link control operation supporting a function (e.g.,     Shouldn't "frame content" be         R    Editor: That implication is exactly what was intended: to distinguish Special Functions from, for example,   N/A
                                               link initialization, frame delimiting, and interframe fill (see clause 5))   something else? It I take out the         BLSs and ELSs. A BLS or ELS appears to be " A link control operation supporting a function
                                               that is communicated by Ordered Sets rather than by frame content."          first part of the sentence I would        communicated by frame content" or a "function communicated by frame content", but they are NOT
                                                                                                                            imply that there is " A link control      Special Functions.
                                                                                                                            operation supporting a function
                                                                                                                            communicated by frame
                                                                                                                            content." or at bare minimum a
                                                                                                                            "function communicated by
                                                                                                                            frame content."

Emulex-009      E       15        3            In the second paragraph of 3.2, an unordered list is described as            In 3.2, second paragraph,            A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
                                               sequenced by alphanumeric characters. While strictly true, this is not       change "alphanumeric" to
                                               adequately specifc.                                                          "alphabetic".
Emulex-010      E       15        3.1.149      "(e.g., see FC-AL-2)" s/b "(e.g., FC-AL-2)"                                  remove "see"                         A    Accept proposed resolution, and also rearrange the sequential parenthetic items, changing                    0.92

                                                                                                                                                                      Unrecognized Ordered Set: An Ordered Set that is not defined to have meaning by this standard, but
                                                                                                                                                                      that may be defined by other standards (e.g., see FC-AL-2) (see 5.2.7.1).

                                                                                                                                                                      to

                                                                                                                                                                      Unrecognized Ordered Set: An Ordered Set (see 5.2.7.1) that is not defined to have meaning by this
                                                                                                                                                                      standard, but that may be defined by other standards (e.g., FC-AL-2).
Emulex-011      E       21        3.4.2        There has not yet been an announced global resolution to the                 No change is recommended,            A    Make no change                                                                                               N/A
                                               symbolic representation of the multiplication operation. FC-FS-3 uses        although the editor assures me it
                                               the bullet character centered vertically on the line.                        would be easy as long as we
                                                                                                                            didn't have to convert to
                                                                                                                            Lukasiewicz notation.
Emulex-013      E       23        4.1          list item k) ends in y.                                                      remove the "y"                       A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Cisco-002           E        23        4.1     spurious "y" in item k)                                                      remove it                            A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Cisco-003           E        23        4.1     "Proprietary and other command sets" is odd                                  replace with "Other ULPs"            A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-014      E       24        4.2.3        In 4.2.3, a list of standards that includes both FC-PI-x and 10GFC is        In 4.2.3, change "specified in FC-   A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
                                               now redundant, since FC-PI-x is now defined to include 10GFC.                PI-x, FC-BaseT, and 10GFC" to
                                                                                                                            "specified in FC-PI-x and FC-
                                                                                                                            BaseT"
Emulex-015      E       29        4.6.1        list item c) should end in "."                                               add "."                              A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-017      E       42        5.2.2        list item a) and b) should end in ";"                                        fix them.                            A    Accept proposed resolution and also add "and" at the end of item b).                                         0.92
Emulex-018      E       49        5.2.4        items a) and b) in list should end in ":"                                    add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-020      E       52        Table 7      9B/10B in the table title is not defined.                                    change to 8B/10B                     A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-021      E       53        Table 8      9B/10B in the table title is not defined.                                    change to 8B/10B                     A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-022      E       54        Table 9      9B/10B in the table title is not defined.                                    change to 8B/10B                     A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Cisco-005           E        55        5.3     IEEE 802.3-2008 is in red, multiple times. Also references to figures,       use black                            A    Accept proposed resolution, for several instances throughout 5.3.                                            0.92
                                               tables, and clauses later.
Emulex-023      E       59        5.3.6.2      list item c) should end in "," not ";"                                       Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-024      E       60        5.3.6.3      list item c) should end in "," not ";"                                       Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-025      E       63        5.3.6.7      list item c) should end in "," not ";"                                       Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-026      E       63        5.3.6.8      list item c) should end in "," not ";"                                       Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-027      E       64        5.3.6.9      list item c) should end in "," not ";"                                       Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-029      E       68        5.4          An FC-0 standard (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the use of the                  Change to "An FC-0 standard          A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                  0.92
                                               Transmitter Training Signal for purposes other than communication of         (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the
                                               Fibre Channel frames.                                                        use of the Transmitter Training
                                                                                                                            Signal." The purpose is limited
                                                                                                                            by the next sentence.
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                                                 O/A/                                                                                                             blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                                                   R/W                                                                                                              N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E      Page # figure #)    Comment                                                               Proposed Resolution                     /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                       version
Brocade-001     E     70        Figure 25    The voltage swings appear to take about 2UI to go up or down and this Increase the slope of the lines         A    Accept proposed resolution and in addition, at the end of the first paragraph of 5.4.1, add the sentence    0.92
                                             is too slow of a slew rate.                                           until they are less than 1/2 of a            "The electrical characteristics of the Transmitter Training Signal are specified in an FC-0 standard, and
                                                                                                                   UI.                                          when indicated in this standard, are indicated informatively."

Brocade-002     E     70        Figure 25    The second phsyical medium state "1" should be a "0".                    Change the "1" to a "0".             A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                 0.92
Avago-003       E     72        5.4.3        Transmitter Training Pattern specification omits need for a non-zero     In the first paragraph of 5.3.2,     A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                 0.92
                                             initialization value                                                     change the last sentence from

                                                                                                                      "PRBS-11 (see figure 26) is the
                                                                                                                      output of an 11-bit linear
                                                                                                                      feedback shift register that is
                                                                                                                      initialized to a value that is
                                                                                                                      randomized for each training
                                                                                                                      frame, and that implements the
                                                                                                                      polynomial"

                                                                                                                      to

                                                                                                                      "PRBS-11 (see figure 26) is the
                                                                                                                      output of an 11-bit linear
                                                                                                                      feedback shift register that is
                                                                                                                      initialized to a value that is
                                                                                                                      randomized to a non-zero value
                                                                                                                      for each training frame, and that
                                                                                                                      implements the polynomial"
Emulex-033      E     78        6.3.4.3      the first paragraph says "When in any of the Word Synchronization        Replace with "In each of the         A    Accept proposed resolution.                                                                                 0.92
                                             Acquired states each received Transmission Word is tested to             Word Synchronization Acquired
                                             determine the validity of the Transmission Word." The "when" in this     states each received
                                             sentence makes it hard to parse                                          Transmission Word is tested to
                                                                                                                      determine the validity of the
                                                                                                                      Transmission Word."
Emulex-034      E     86        Table 18     Cross references in table 18 do not have hot links                       Add hot links                        R    Editor advises this appears to be a quirk in FrameMaker, that hot links didn't carry over into the          N/A
                                                                                                                                                                continuation of the table. Editor was granted a dispensation for this sin.
Brocade-009     E     91        8            The addition of Transmitter Training to Speed Negotiation has            I would like input from the group         Editor: 7.2 was intended to provide the introduction to the initialization process. Does it fall short?
                                             complicated link initialization. We should add an introduction to help   and mainly the editor as to how
                                             summarize the initialization process.                                    to write a more complete
                                                                                                                      overview of the initialization
                                                                                                                      process. I would be glad to lead
                                                                                                                      this effort to make the process
                                                                                                                      more understandable.
Emulex-035      E     91        8.2          End of 1st paragraph "The link quality for speed negotiation purposes change to "The link quality for              Editor recommends to reject, since Transmitter Training Signal is defined to be a transmission code (see
                                             is error free Transmission Word synchronization for a minimum            speed negotiation purposes is             3.1.147 and 5.4.1)
                                             number of Transmission Words specified in clause 6 as the pass           error free Transmission Word
                                             sync_test count for the transmission code being used."                   synchronization for a minimum
                                             This is not just for a transmission code. Transmitter Training Signal is number of Transmission Words
                                             not a transmission code.                                                 specified in 6.3.3.2.3, 6.4.2, and
                                                                                                                      6.5.2 as the pass sync_test
                                                                                                                      count for specific synchronization
                                                                                                                      conditions.
Emulex-036      E     91        8.2          Second paragraph "Because the link quality requirements for speed        change to "Because the link          A    change to "Because the link quality requirements for speed negotiation are not as stringent as for other    0.92
                                             negotiation are not quite as stringent as for normal operation it is     quality requirements for speed            operations it is possible to complete speed negotiation yet have an excessive error rate in other
                                             possible to complete speed negotiation yet have an excessive error       negotiation are not quite as              operations. Determination of excessive error rate outside of speed negotiation may be ..."
                                             rate in later operation. Later determination of excessive error rate may stringent as for other operations
                                             be…" later is ambiguous.                                                 it is possible to complete speed
                                                                                                                      negotiation yet have an
                                                                                                                      excessive error rate in other
                                                                                                                      operations. Determination of
                                                                                                                      excessive error rate outside of
                                                                                                                      speed negotiation may be ..."
Emulex-037      E     92        8.3          list item a) should be split                                             change to                            A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                  0.92
                                                                                                                      a) Only point-to-point links are
                                                                                                                      supported;
                                                                                                                      b) Loop configurations that
                                                                                                                      negotiate speeds shall present a
                                                                                                                      single port to the other
                                                                                                                      negotiating port for speed
                                                                                                                      negotiation purposes;
Emulex-038      E     92        8.3          list item g) should end in ":"                                           change to "g) If a port configured   A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                  0.92
                                                                                                                      for speed negotiation is attached
                                                                                                                      to a loop, the port being attached
                                                                                                                      either:"
Emulex-039      E     92        8.3          list item c) should end in ":"                                           change to "However:"                 A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                  0.92
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                                                   O/A/                                                                                                               blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                                                     R/W                                                                                                                N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E      Page # figure #)    Comment                                                                        Proposed Resolution              /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                         version
Emulex-040      E     92        8.3          list item b) the following is confusing "Similar comments apply for all        Remove the sentence or clarify   A    Accept the proposed deletion of the confusing sentence.                                                       0.92
                                             other features described." What "other features"                               what it is refereing to.
Emulex-041      E     92        8.3          list item d) the following is vague "the normal few milliseconds"              change to "a few milliseconds"    A   Accept proposed resolution                                                                                 0.92
Emulex-042      E     92        8.3          list item f) what is the purpose of "any" in the sentence?                     change to "The algorithm          Q   No change. The word "any" answers the questionin the proposed resolution, and also refers back to the N/A
                                                                                                                            supports ports capable of up to a     overview, which explains that the negotiating ports need not negotiate the same list of speeds in order to
                                                                                                                            maximum of 4 speeds" Do they          converge.
                                                                                                                            have to be contiguous in the
                                                                                                                            range of speeds?
Emulex-043      E     92        8.3          list item g) the multiple references to "port" in this is confusing. It is not re-word                           A   Change 8.3 list item G from                                                                                   0.92
                                             clear what this item is trying to convey
                                                                                                                                                                  g) If a port configured for speed negotiation is attached to a loop, the port being attached either
                                                                                                                                                                  A) shall be attached via a port in the loop that presents a single speed to the port being attached; or
                                                                                                                                                                  B) the port in the existing loop shall conduct the speed negotiation algorithm described here with the port
                                                                                                                                                                  being attached before inserting the port being attached into the loop.

                                                                                                                                                                  to

                                                                                                                                                                  g) If an FL_Port configured for speed negotiation is attached to a loop, the FL_Port either:
                                                                                                                                                                  A) is being attached to a port in the loop that presents a single speed and does not perform speed
                                                                                                                                                                  negotiation; or
                                                                                                                                                                  B) is being attached to a port in the loop that completes the speed negotiation algorithm described here
                                                                                                                                                                  before inserting the FL_Port into the loop.

Brocade-004     E     93        8.5          "This may cause the transmission code to change" is vague because          Suggested wording is:If a         A       Change the last paragraph of 8.5 from                                                                         0.92
                                             of the pronoun "this".                                                     PN_Port negotiates among
                                                                                                                        multiple physical variants that           This may cause the transmission code to change (e.g., from Transmitter Training Signal to 8B/10B and
                                                                                                                        use different transmission codes,         back) during speed negotiation, and may cause the transmitter to be using a different transmission code
                                                                                                                        the transmission code shall               than the receiver at some times.
                                                                                                                        change (e.g., from Transmitter
                                                                                                                        Training Signal to 8B/10B and             to
                                                                                                                        back) during speed negotiation,
                                                                                                                        and the transmitter uses a                If a PN_Port negotiates among multiple physical variants that use different transmission codes, the
                                                                                                                        different transmission code than          transmission code changes (e.g., from Transmitter Training Signal to 8B/10B and back) during speed
                                                                                                                        the receiver at some times.               negotiation, and the transmitter uses a different transmission code than the receiver at some times.

Emulex-044      E     93        8.5          list following "For FC_Ports that support the Transmitter Training         add the "thens"                      A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                             Signal:" needs "then" for each "if" ecpecially list item b)
Emulex-045      E     93        8.4          1st paragraph "This requirement maintains even ..."                        change to "This requirement          A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                                                                                                        applies even ..."
Emulex-046      E     93        8.5          Last paragraph starts with "this" what is "this"                           clarify what "this" is.              A    see Brocade-004                                                                                               0.92
Brocade-005     E     94        8.6.1        in the fifth line of the second list item a, insure s/b ensure                                                  A    Accepte proposed resolution, and also apply to two more, in the first paragraph of 23.4.4.1 and in the        0.92
                                                                                                                                                                  first paragraph of G.4.4.
Emulex-047      E     94        8.6.1        list item de) should end in ":"                                            Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution, presuming the item at issue is the second list item e.                            0.92
Emulex-048      E     95        8.7.1        You have a different state diagram notation here than what is defined      Define the alternate state           O    Editor recommends the resolution detailed in T11/09-615v0.
                                             in clause 3.                                                               diagram notation.
                                                                                                                                                                  Editor presumes that 8.6.2, 8.6.3, 8.6.4, and 8.6.5 are the intended locations of the issue, since there is
                                                                                                                                                                  no 8.7.1 and 8.6.1 is actually quite similar to the method defined in 3.3.6
Emulex-050      E     104       8.6.5        Paragraph leading into list needs a "." and a sentence to introduce the Change it.                              A    Add the recommended period and move the whole paragraph to the beginning of the subclause. The list 0.92
                                             list.                                                                                                                then is introduced consistently with the other states.
Emulex-051      E     104       8.6.6        list item b) should end in ":"                                          Change it.                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                  0.92
Emulex-052      E     105       8.6.6        list item D) are the two lines supposed to be together? "and" belongs   Change it.                              A    Change                                                                                                      0.92
                                             on a separate line
                                                                                                                                                                  D) entry into Wait_for_signal if the optional Slow_wait stage is implemented.
                                                                                                                                                                  tneg is compared against t_fail to timeout in case of Loss-of-Signal quality during negotiation; and
                                                                                                                                                                  c) ...

                                                                                                                                                                  to

                                                                                                                                                                  D) entry into Wait_for_signal if the optional Slow_wait stage is implemented;
                                                                                                                                                                  c) tneg is compared against t_fail to timeout in case of Loss-of-Signal quality during negotiation; and
                                                                                                                                                                  d) ...
Emulex-053      E     106       8.6.6        list item h_) should end in ";"                                            Change it.                           A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-054      E     107       9.2          list item A) and B) should be a) and b)                                    fix it.                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                                                       O/A/                                                                                                               blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                                                         R/W                                                                                                                N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E     Page # figure #)     Comment                                                                        Proposed Resolution                  /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                         version
Emulex-055      E     108       9.3.3        "These variables are set on decoding the values received in arriving           change to "These variables are       A    Change the third regular paragraph of 9.3.3. from                                                             0.92
                                             Training Frames (see table 16 and table 17) while the Transmitter              set on decoding the values
                                             Training Signal Transmission Word synchronization state is Word                received in arriving Training             These variables are set on decoding the values received in arriving Training Frames (see table 16 and
                                             Synchronization Acquired (see 6.5.1) during transmitter training:" is          Frames (see table 16 and table            table 17) while the Transmitter Training Signal Transmission Word synchronization state is Word
                                             hard to parse                                                                  17) during transmitter training,          Synchronization Acquired (see 6.5.1) during transmitter training:
                                                                                                                            while the Transmitter Training
                                                                                                                            Signal Transmission Word                  to
                                                                                                                            synchronization state is Word
                                                                                                                            Synchronization Acquired (see             These variables are set on decoding the values received in arriving Training Frames (see table 16 and
                                                                                                                            6.5.1):"                                  table 17) during transmitter training. They are only set while the Transmitter Training Signal Transmission
                                                                                                                                                                      Word synchronization state is Word Synchronization Acquired (see 6.5.1):
Emulex-056      E     109       9.3.3        Remove figure from the middle of the unordered list                                                                 A    Move figure 36 to the end of 9.3.1 where it is referenced, and accept the likely result of a largely empty    0.92
                                                                                                                                                                      preceding page
Emulex-057      E     110       9.3.3        first list item l) should end with a "." not ";"                               change to "."                        A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-058      E     110       9.2          list item k) should end in "; and"                                             add "and"                            A    Accept the proposed resolution, but against 9.3.3. There is no item k in 9.2, and there is an item k with     0.92
                                                                                                                                                                      the indicated problem on page 110 in 9.3.3
Emulex-059      E     110       9.2          list item l) should ent in "."                                                 change ";" to "."                    A    Right page, right issue, wrong subclause. See Emulex-057                                                      0.92
Emulex-060      E     112       9.3.4.2.1    list item r) should end in "; and"                                             add "and"                            A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-061      E     112       9.3.4.2.1    list item 3) should end in ";"                                                 add ";"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-063      E     114       9.3.4.2.5    In the second and third lists in 9.3.4.2.5, the penultimate list items lack    In the second and third lists in     A    Accept in principle. See Emulex-064 and Emulex-065.                                                           0.92
                                             an appended conjunction.                                                       9.3.4.2.5, append " and" to the
                                                                                                                            penultimate list items.
Emulex-064      E     114       9.3.4.2.5    second list item a) should end in "; and"                                      add "and"                            A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-065      E     114       9.3.4.2.5    third list item a) should end in "; or                                         add "or"                             A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-066      E     119       9.3.6.2.2    list item 3) should end in ";"                                                 add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-067      E     119       9.3.6.2.2    list item D) should end in "," (both occurances)                               change to ","                        A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-068      E     119       9.3.6.2.2    list item 4) should end in ";"                                                 add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-069      E     120       9.3.6.2.3    second list item a) should end in ":"                                          add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-070      E     120       9.3.6.2.3    list item c) should end in "," not ";"                                         change to ","                        A    Accept in principle, should be a period since it ends the sentence.                                           0.92
Emulex-071      E     129       10.3.8.3.3   list item b) should end in "."                                                 add "."                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-072      E     135       11.3.1       Resolve editor's note 2 at bottom of page                                                                           O    Editor recommends the resolution documented in T11/09-612v0
Emulex-073      E     141       11.6.3       The last paragraph of 11.6.3 duplicates the last sentence of the prior         Delete the last paragraph of         A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                             paragraph.                                                                     11.6.3.
Emulex-076      E     157       12.3.3       list item 1) should end in ":" (both occurances)                               add ":"                               A   Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-077      E     162       13.2         introduction to optional headers still references the obsoleted                In the list in the first paragraph of A   Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                             Association_Header.                                                            13.2, remove the list item for the
                                                                                                                            Association_Header and properly
                                                                                                                            format the new penultimate list
                                                                                                                            item. In figure 46, remove the
                                                                                                                            Association_Header.

Emulex-078      E     162       13.2         introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                                add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Brocade-010     E     163       Figure 46    Still shows optional Association_Header                                        Remove Association_Header            A    Accept. See Emulex-077 for details.                                                                           0.92
Emulex-079      E     168       13.3.3       list item a) should end in ";" list item b) should end in "; and"              fix them.                            A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-080      E     193       15.2         In the first line of 15.2 there is an instance of "fibre channel" (i.e., not   In the first line of 15.2 change     A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                             capitalized).                                                                  "fibre channel" to "Fibre Channel"

Emulex-081      E     195       15.3.2.2.2   introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                                add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-082      E     200       15.3.2.3.7   move table out of middle of nested list                                        fix                                  A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-083      E     207       16.4.2       list item m) should end in ";"                                                 change ".;" to ";"                   A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-084      E     221       18.4.8       list item b) and A) the or belongs after the A)                                move the or                          A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-085      E     221       18.4.8       list item f), g), and l) should end in ":"                                     add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-086      E     224       18.4.10.2    introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                                add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-087      E     240       19.3.3.3     list item b) should end in "; and"                                             add "and"                            A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-088      E     244       19.3.9.2.1   introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                                change "." to ":"                    A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-089      E     247       19.4.1       introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                                add ":"                              A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-090      E     262       20.8         list item e) should end in ":"                                                 change "." to ":"                    A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
Emulex-091      E     263       20.8         list item f) should end in ":"                                                 change "." to ":"                    A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                                    0.92
                                Locator
Comment                         (e.g.,
number                          section or                                                                                     O/A/                                                                                                                blank or
(required for           Printed table or                                                                                       R/W                                                                                                                 N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E     Page # figure #)     Comment                                                     Proposed Resolution   /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                          version
Emulex-092      E     263       20.9         list item between item c) and d) needs to be a list item.   fix                   O    Editor recommends: Change 20.9 item c from

                                                                                                                                    c) If the Sequence Recipient has specified during Login non support of relative offset for one or more
                                                                                                                                    Information Categories, the Sequence Recipient shall verify that the relative offset present bit (F_CTL bit
                                                                                                                                    3) is set to zero and reassemble each of these Information Categories using SEQ_CNT.

                                                                                                                                    If the relative offset bit (F_CTL bit 3) is set to one for any of these Information Categories, the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient shall discard the frame, and in an acknowledged class of service shall issue a P_RJT with a
                                                                                                                                    reason code of "relative offset not supported";

                                                                                                                                    to

                                                                                                                                    c) If the Sequence Recipient receives a frame in an Information Category for which the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient has specified during Login non support of relative offset, and the relative offset present bit in
                                                                                                                                    the frame (F_CTL bit 3) is set to zero, the Sequence Recipient shall reassemble that frame using
                                                                                                                                    SEQ_CNT;

                                                                                                                                    d) If the Sequence Recipient receives a frame in an Information Category for which the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient has specified during Login non support of relative offset, and the relative offset present bit in
                                                                                                                                    the frame (F_CTL bit 3) is set to one, the Sequence Recipient shall discard the frame, and in an
                                                                                                                                    acknowledged class of service shall issue a P_RJT with a reason code of "relative offset not supported";


Emulex-093      E     263       20.9         list item between item d) and e) needs to be a list item.   fix                   O    Noting that items d and e differ only in the relative offset type, and not in the results, editor recommends
                                                                                                                                    combining them by leaving out the extraneous condition: Change 20.9 list item d and e from

                                                                                                                                    d) If the Sequence Recipient has indicated during Login relative offset support for one or more
                                                                                                                                    Information Categories and specified this support as continuously increasing relative offset, the
                                                                                                                                    Sequence Recipient shall verify that the relative offset present bit (F_CTL bit 3) is set to one and
                                                                                                                                    assemble each of these Information Categories using relative offset.

                                                                                                                                    If the Sequence Initiator lacks the relative offset capability and has set the bit to zero, the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient shall use SEQ_CNT for reassembly;

                                                                                                                                    e ) If the Sequence Recipient has indicated during Login relative offset support for one or more
                                                                                                                                    Information Categories and specified this support as random relative offset, the Sequence Recipient
                                                                                                                                    shall verify that the relative offset present bit (F_CTL bit 3) is set to one and assemble each of these
                                                                                                                                    Information Categories using relative offset.

                                                                                                                                    If the Sequence Initiator lacks the relative offset capability and has set the bit to zero, the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient shall use SEQ_CNT for reassembly; and

                                                                                                                                    to

                                                                                                                                    d) If the Sequence Recipient receives a frame in an Information Category for which the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient has specified during Login support of relative offset and the relative offset present bit in the
                                                                                                                                    frame (F_CTL bit 3) is set to one, the Sequence Recipient shall reassemble that frame using relative
                                                                                                                                    offset;

                                                                                                                                    e) If the Sequence Recipient receives a frame in an Information Category for which the Sequence
                                                                                                                                    Recipient has specified during Login support of relative offset and the relative offset present bit in the
                                                                                                                                    frame (F_CTL bit 3) is set to zero, the Sequence Recipient shall reassemble that frame using SEQ_CNT;
                                  Locator
Comment                           (e.g.,
number                            section or                                                                                                     O/A/                                                                                                          blank or
(required for             Printed table or                                                                                                       R/W                                                                                                           N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E       Page # figure #)     Comment                                                            Proposed Resolution            /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                    version
Emulex-094      E       263       20.9         list item between item e) and f) needs to be a list item.          fix                            O    Editor recommends: Combine with item d as shown in Emulex-093




Emulex-096      E       273       21.5.4.4     introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                    add ":"                        A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                               0.92
Emulex-097      E       273       21.5.4.5     introductory sentence to list should end in ":"                    add ":"                        A    Accept proposed resolution                                                                               0.92
Cisco-001           E         v     Abstract   FC-LS should be FC-LS-x                                            as suggested                   A    In the Abstract, change FC-LS to FC-LS-2. The comparable reference to FC-PI-x is actually not generic,   0.92
                                                                                                                                                      but defined in the glossary as a specific list of FC-0 standards.
Emulex-001      E       xxx       Foreword     The T11 chair is still identified as Robert Snively (bless him!)   In the Foreword, change the T11 A   Accept proposed resolution                                                                               0.92
                                                                                                                  chair to Steven Wilson
                                  Locator
Comment                           (e.g.,
number                            section or                                                                                              O/A/                                                                                                           blank or
(required for             Printed table or                                                                                                R/W                                                                                                            N/A or Fix
summary)        T/E       Page # figure #)     Comment                                                              Proposed Resolution   /Q   Work Group Resolution                                                                                     version
                      z                        This is a required last row, not a comment. Do not change or sort.

Key                               moss         Final resolution listed, not reject                                                        O    Open: An action has been identified and is not complete
                                                                                                                                               Accepted: The issue has been confirmed and the work group resolution indicates any necessary
                                                                                                                                               changes. The work group resolution may differ from any that may have been proposed by the
                                  rose         Final resolution listed: reject                                                            A    commenter
                                                                                                                                               Rejected: The issue has been rejected, and the resolution indicates the reason. The resolution may also
                                  daisy        Open editorial - editor believes the resolution may be technical                           R    indicate changes found useful to improve the readability of the standard
                                               Open editorial - incorporate resolution after next meeting unless
                                  orchid       contested                                                                                  W    Withdrawn: The commenter has withdrawn the comment.
                                  none         Not considered yet                                                                         Q    Question: Answer provide to request for information or interpretation. No change needed.



Summary                           119          All                                                                                        14   not fixed yet
                                  12           All Open                                                                                   6    no change needed
                                  100          All Accepted                                                                               99   fixed in version 0.92
                                  3            All Rejected
                                  1            All Withdrawn
                                  1            All Answered Questions
                                  2            All Not Processed

                                  24           All Technical
                                  6            All Open Technical
                                  16           All Accepted Technical
                                  1            All Rejected Technical
                                  1            All Withdrawn Technical
                                  0            All Answered Technical Questions
                                  0            All Not Processed Technical

                                  95           All Editorial
                                  6            All Open Editorial
                                  84           All Accepted Editorial
                                  2            All Rejected Editorial
                                  0            All Withdrawn Editorial
                                  1            All Answered Editorial Questions
                                  2            All Not Processed Editorial

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:1
posted:8/18/2011
language:English
pages:11