Electronic Prescribing - PowerPoint

Document Sample
scope of work template
							Patricia L. Hale, MD, PhD, FACP
CMIO, Glens Falls Hospital and CTO , Adirondack Regional
Community Health Information Exchange
pathale@pathalemd.com
www.pathalemd.com
Learning Objectives
 Impact of e-prescribing on patient safety and
  reduction of medication errors
 What’s new

 Explore the training requirements for physicians

 Explore the implementation differences between
  a small medical practice and an RHIN
   7,000 Americans Die Annually
From Preventable Medication Errors




                              1.5 Million Americans Injured Annually
                                by Preventable Medication Errors
                                             Source: The Institute of Medicine of the National
                                             Academies of Science (IOM).2006
                                             Slide used by permission from SureScripts
                               The Challenge of “Prescription Hand-offs”
                               •     Illegible Handwriting
Physicians write               •     Unclear Abbreviations and Doses
4.5 billion prescriptions      •     Verbal Communication Among
                                     Physicians, Patients and Pharmacists
each year. . . .
                   On Paper!
   Over 4.5 Billion Prescriptions Written Annually…
   Less than 1 in 5 of Physicians Use e-Prescribing
   Only 20% of prescriptions are prescribed
    electronically with 80% still handwritten
   Most electronic prescriptions are still sent by FAX

      National savings from universal adoption of
            electronic prescribing systems
             could be as high as $27 billion
                  Sources: eHealth Initiative, 2004 and: Center for Information Technology Leadership, “The Value of
                  Computerized Provider Order Entry in Ambulatory Settings,” 2003.
         Rx
                                         Rx

Patient safety
   Between 1.5%-4.0% prescriptions                                 Rx
    are in error with serious patient
    risk
   Adverse drug events occur in 5%-
    18% of ambulatory patients
Quality of care - Compliance                     Illegible
   20% of scripts are never filled               handwriting
   Patient satisfaction is declining            Phone tag and
Cost of errors: $2 billion / year                 fax tag
                                                 Patient waiting
Impact on productivity*                           in the pharmacy
 Physician practice: 3 hours per day
   Pharmacy: 4 hours per day (up to 1
    call per Rx)
   Inefficient delivery
                                                                                                              Unfilled

    823 million visits to                                                             Renewals
                                                                                                                 0.4 B


     physician offices in 20001                                                                    0.5 B                                1.5 B

                                                                                                                                      Refills
    4 out of 5 patients who visit
     a physician leave with at
     least one prescription2                                                                                  1.4 B

                                                                                                      New Scripts
    65% of the US population
     (91% of Medicare) use a
     prescription medication                                                                         3.5 Billion Total Filled Prescription
                                                                                                  Transactions in 2003 increased to 4.5 in
     each year3                                                                                                      2006


1)   Pastor PN et. al. Chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Health, United States, 2002. National Center for Health Statistics. 2002.
2)   The chain pharmacy industry profile. National Association of Chain Drug Stores. 2001.
3)   Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. MEPS Highlights #11: distribution of health care expenses, 1999.
                                                                                      Best estimates for EMR
                                                                    Practice
                                                                                      adoption based on high
                                    Rx                                Size
                                                                                        quality surveys (%)
                                 InterOp
                                                                        All                         24
                                                                       Solo                         16
                                                                     Large*                         39
    150,000 Certified EMR Users                                       *”Large” is defined as > 20 physician FTEs in one
                                                                      study with 39% adoption and >50 in two another
        Certified version typically a                                studies with 47% and 57% adoption respectively.
         simple upgrade away
        Extremely low awareness
         among install base


Sources: Jha et al, Health Affairs, 10/11/06; MGMA, 2005; CDC/NCHS Nat’l Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2005; HSC
Community Tracking Study, 2006; Forrester, 2003; SureScripts estimates, 2006. Slide used by permission from SureScripts
   Ability to create a prescription electronically
   Ability to receive automated decision support during script
    creation
      Medication lists and information
      Eligibility determination
      Formulary coverage from insurer including co-pay information
      Prior authorization
      clinical decision support including Drug interactions, drug-
        allergy, etc.
   Ability to send script electronically to pharmacy using standard
    transmission messaging (NCPDP SCRIPT, ASC12)
   Ability to receive/authorize pharmacy initiated-renewals
    electronically
   Ability to determine “fill status” as a measure of compliance
    (medication history)
   Ability for pharmacy to process electronic script in their system
                                                 Slide used by permission from SureScripts
                                                                Pharmacy
Prescriber                          ProxyMed and others          and PBM
   eRx
                                                               eRx Software
Software                   SureScripts Provides:
                          New Rx, refills, renewals,
                           authorizations, change
                           Rx, Prescription history
                              from pharmacies


                                     Medimedia
                                     and others


     RxHub Provides: Eligibility, Formularies, medication claims histories
      Minutes per day




                        Prescribers   Office staff
(2006 Study: Brown University)                   Slide used by permission from SureScripts
               Pen
                     Print
                     6%


                              Fax
                             37%
                                      EDI
                                       +
                                    Decision
                                    Support
                                    61%




Source: CITL                                   Slide used by permission from SureScripts
                                                                                                           “Evidence-
                                                           <5%                           National            Based”
                                  16-40%                                 National                           Medicine
                                                                          Health         Disease
                                                     Regional                           Databases
                 7-20%            Electronic          Health           Information
 40-80%                            Medical         Information        Infrastructure
                                   Records          Networks
 Patient &      Electronic         Systems
Physicians     Prescribing
  Access
 Medical
 Websites
                                        Increased Decision Support


                                                                                                       Algorithm-driven
                                                                                                        medicine and
                                                                                                        decision making
                                                                                 Population-
                                                              Streamlined
                                                                                  based outcomes
                                         Integrated                              and cost
                      Gains in
                                                                 information
                                          database allow                          information
                       accuracy and                              retrieval:
                                          decision                                readily available
  Better informed     connectivity       support tools          valuable for
                                                                 epidemiology     to consumers,
   consumers           enhance safety                                             physicians,
                       and efficiency                                             payers
   Patients:
     Increased safety, efficiency and compliance
     Lower co-pays
   Pharmacies:
     Increased efficiency, improved care, improved patient
      satisfaction
   Payors/PBMs:
     Increased generic/formulary usage, efficiency, Rx
      compliance and prevention of ADEs (reduced costs)
   Providers:
     Increased efficiency, improved care, patient satisfaction and
      potential incentives (pay-for-performance)
   Cost of buying, installing, implementing and
    supporting a system
   Lack of reimbursement for costs, time and
    resources
   Increased time to use the system = reduced
    productivity (initially)
   Increased time required to review warnings,
    alerts and recommendations (long term)
   Still not considered a routine standard of practice
            In the past…                                           But now…
Very few pharmacies were directly connected to      Over 95% of US pharmacies are connected into
physician practices                                 a single network and growing

                                                    Computer applications can communicate directly
Electronic communications meant faxes
                                                    with each other

Only half the problem was being addressed…          Renewals can be automated in addition to new
writing new scripts                                 scripts

Software didn’t support the workflows in the        Software integrates with existing practice
practice                                            systems and smoothes office workflow

                                                    Most practices will save physician and staff time
There were few real benefits for most practices
                                                    as well as improve patient safety

                                                    Collaboration now available with payors on
There wasn’t a future path to additional benefits
                                                    patient compliance and other future functions

Automation was being driven by a few Health         State and nation-wide initiatives now occur
Plans and small software vendors                    involving all major stakeholders
   Economic Incentives
       Grant and Loan Programs
       Reimbursement for Utilization
       Pay for Performance
       Malpractice Insurance Premium Reductions
       Healthcare IT Suppliers group discounts, etc
       Pharmacies or Transaction Brokers Defray Costs
   Policy Incentives and Programs
     Accreditation (JCAHO 2005 Hospitals’ National Patient Safety Goals,
        others in development)
       Employer Programs (Leapfrog and others)
       Medicare support for economic incentives
       DOQ-IT
       CCHIT certification of inpatient and ambulatory EMRs
       Mandates ???
   Voluntary program
   Mandatory National eRx Standards for Medicare
     Initial standards 2005; Pilot program 2006, Final Standards 2009
     Recommendations delivered by NCVHS
   Information Requirements include
     Lower cost, therapeutically appropriate alternatives
     Interactive, real-time to the extent feasible
   Encourages Physician Adoption:
     Permits use of appropriate messaging
     Modifies anti-kickback regulation for hospital, physician groups and plan
      administrators to allow them to give out eRx hardware and training
     Allows plans to pay-for-technology and pay-for-cost effective
      performance in Medicare Advantage Plans
     $50MM of federal grant money in 2007 (but must be budgeted)
   Preempts State Laws contrary to the national standards or
    those that restrict the ability to carry out the new law.
   Progress-to-date
       Issued Notice of Proposed Rule-Making (10/05)
       Issued final rule naming foundation standards (11/05)
       Pilot programs competed and reports submitted (2/06)
    Deadline for    Launch 1-yr                                          All Medicare
    Secretary to      voluntary                         Deadline for    providers using
                                       Evaluation       Secretary to
      develop       ePrescribing                                       ePrescribing must
                                     results of pilot   finalize and
    ePrescribing   pilot program;                                       adopt finalized
                                     program due to        release
     Standards     plans can offer                                         standards
                                        Congress         standards
                         P4P



Sept 1, 2005       Jan 1, 2006        Apr 1, 2007       Apr 1, 2008       April 2009
   RAND – New Jersey BCBS NJ, Caremark mail order, Walgreen
    retail pharmacy
   Brigham & Women’s Hospital - CareGroup Health system in
    Boston use in EMR and e-prescribing “Gateway” utility
   Achieve – tech vendor for long term care industry in Midwest
    with it’s own pharmacies
   Ohio University Hospital Health System and Ohio KePRO
    QIO - 300 hospital physician practices
   Surescripts - with practices in Florida, Mass, Nevada, New
    Jersey and Tennessee with a variety of software vendor
    systems and assortment of chain and independent
    pharmacies
   Med History – recommended to be included as ready for
    adoption. Main challenge is ensuring the data is collected and
    reconciled from a large number of sources to be sure history is
    complete.
   Formulary and Benefits – recommended to be included as
    ready for adoption. Issues:
      Systems must adequately match patient to health plan
      Payers vary in the level of information provided making
       data difficult to interpret
      Should support real-time changes in patient status as
       patient moves between benefit plans
   Prescription Fill Status Notification – recommended to be
    included as ready for adoption. However many pharmacies do
    not currently have the ability to track patient pick-up status
    accurately and questionable prescriber demand for this if the
    info is already available in the med history.
   Prior Authorization – NOT recommended for implementation
    – Limited experience at pilot sites to evaluate this function and
    there are work flow and other issues which suggest a need to
    have more work done to improve the standard.
   Structured and Codified Sig - NOT recommended for
    implementation – needs additional work with reference to
    field definitions and examples as well as naming conventions
    and clarification of field use.
   RxNorm – (standard for name, dose and form of
    drugs) – Not recommended for implementation –
    Dictionary standard requires further evaluation
    and refinement.
   Recommended updates to SCRIPT v8.1 – Need to
    further refine the standard to be able to:
     update prescriptions without having to create a new
      order,
     send a refill from the facility to the pharmacy without
      physician intervention,
     update patient information outside the context of
      prescriptions
   Prescriber staff (“surrogate prescribers”) played a much
    more important role in the process than anticipated.
   Never fully replaces need for paper-based prescribing
   Causes a shift in pharmacy work flow
   Poor adoption and use of medication history
   Long term care site reported a reduction in new
    prescription rate which may indicate reduction in
    accumulation of multiple medication
   Not enough data yet on effects on safety or change in use
    of generic medications.
The National ePrescribing Patient Safety Initiative
                    (NEPSI)

  A Coalition of the Nation’s Most Prominent Technology Companies,
       Healthcare Benefit And Medical Provider Organizations




   “Dedicated to improving patient safety by providing free
    electronic prescribing for every physician in America”



                                               Slide used by permission from NEPSI
National Sponsors   Technology Sponsors




                    Health Benefit Sponsors



                    Search Sponsor



                    Connectivity Sponsors
                The “ATM of Healthcare??”
   eRx NOW™ from Allscripts described as:
     Simple: Web-based E-prescribing Software
          Easy To Install and update
          Easy Interoperability
          Custom search engine from Google
          Formulary information available
     Safe
        Comprehensive Allergy and Drug Interaction Checking
     Secure
        Secure anytime, anywhere access
        Rigorous credentialing and authentication


                    www.nationaleRx.com

                                              Slide used by permission from NEPSI
Slide used by permission from SureScripts
Slide used by permission from SureScripts
 Pharmacy Health Information Exchange™,
        operated by SureScripts®




E-Prescribing E-Refills   Rx History   Eligibility       Formulary


                                        Slide used by permission from SureScripts
                                                 System
       Company                      Product               E-Prescrib.   E-Refills   Rx History* Formulary* Eligibility
                                                  Type

A4 Health Systems      Healthmatics® EMR          EMR


Allscripts             TouchWorks/ TouchScript   EP/EMR


Allscripts/NEPSI       eRx NOW™                  EP/EMR


ASP.MD                 ASP.MD                     EMR


athenahealth           athenahealth               EMR


Axolotl                Axolotl                   EP/EMR


BCBS/AL                InfoSolutions              EP


BMA Enterprises        Chart Management System    EMR


Bond Medical           BondMedical, Inc           EMR


Cerner                 Community Health Record    EP


ChartConnect           MedManager                EP/EMR


DAW Systems            ScriptSure                 EP


DrFirst                DrFirst Rcopia             EP

eClinicalWorks, Inc.   eClinicalWorks             EMR

                                                  Slide used by permission from SureScripts
   GoldRx certification status
      No longer based on just compliance to standards
      Identifies which vendors are not just testing and
       marketing interoperability but are truly delivering
       and committed to:
          Customer Education
          Proven Pharmacy Interoperability
          Advanced Medication Management
          Workflow Enhancements & Demonstrable
           Expert Experience with Electronic Prescribing
           Process

                                            Slide used by permission from SureScripts
   The first products to achieve
    GoldRx certification
    announced in Feb 2007:
        TouchWorks EHR(Allscripts)
        ChartConnect EMR
        Rcopia (DrFirst)
        NextGen EMR
        eScript (RelayHealth)
        Pocketscript (Zix)




        Slide used by permission from SureScripts
Created by the National
Association of Chain Drug
Stores, the National
Community Pharmacists
Association and SureScripts




Last Year: RI was #1, MA was
#3, MI was #10, WA and NJ not
on last years list and FL and VA
were in last year’s Top 10

                                   Slide used by permission from SureScripts
Certification Commission for Health Information
Technology (CCHIT)
CCHIT Certification EMR ePrescribing Criteria            2007   2008   2009
                                                         l
Send an electronic prescription to pharmacy
Send a query for formulary information                          l

Send a query for medication history to PBM or pharmacy          l
and import medication list into EHR
Respond to a request for a refill sent from a pharmacy   l

Receive medication fulfillment history                          l

Respond to a request for a prescription change from a           l
pharmacy
                                                                l
Send a cancel prescription message to a pharmacy

Send electronic prescription to pharmacy including                     l
structured and coded SIG instructions
                    RxHub              SureScripts

Source of Data      Claims data from   Dispensed Drug Data
                    PBMs               from Pharmacies
Interoperability    Pass-through       Repository
Model
Details Included    No sig             Sig (unstructured)


Regional Coverage   Plan dependent     Pharmacy dependent


Pricing             $$$                $


          44
45
46
   A4 Health            InstantDx           OA Systems
   Achieve
   Allscripts           iScribe             Phytel
   Athena Health        MA Share            Purkinje
   Bond Medical
   Catalis Health       McKesson            Relay Health RxNT
   Cerner               MDAnywhere          SafeMed
   DrFirst
   eClinical Works      MdOffices           Script IQ
   eHealth Solutions    Medical Info Sys    ScriptRx
   EmDeon/WebMD
   EPIC                 MedicWare           Scriptsure
   Gold Standard        MedKeeper           Sequel Systems
   H2H Solutions
   Health Vision        MedPlus             SSIMED
                         Medport             STI Con
                         NewCrop             Synamed
                         NextGen             Zix Corporation

Bold = in production
          47
Health care professionals can register for an
ICERx.org account at www.ICERx.org or call
1.888.ICERX.50 (888-423-7950).
   During periods of emergency, licensed health care
    professionals who have registered on ICERx.org
    can login to the online prescription database,
    where they will have access to:
     Evacuee prescription history information and the
      name of the provider who wrote the prescription and
      the pharmacy that filled it
     Available patient clinical alerts, including drug
      interaction, therapeutic duplication and elderly alerts
     Clinical pharmacology drug reference information,
      including drug monographs, interaction reports and
      the drug identifier tool
As of February 2nd, 2004 - 25 States         As of February 2nd, 2007 - 48 States and
 cleared for electronic prescribing      Washington, D.C. cleared for electronic prescribing




                                       Slide used by permission from SureScripts
     Not shown: HI: 42%; AL: 24%; As of November 9, 2006
52
   Access to more than 160 million patient prescription information
    records via payers and PBMs, through the growing list of RxHub
    certified technology partners. Direct contracts with payers and PBMs
    represent additional access to more than 50 million patients.
   An increase in transaction volumes of 50% from 29 million
    transactions in 2005 to more than 43 million transactions in 2006. These
    transactions were real-time requests for patient eligibility and benefits,
    formulary, and medication history information, made at the point-of-
    care in the ambulatory and acute care settings from clinicians across the
    United States.
   A ten-fold increase in true electronic prescriptions, which includes the
    transmission of patient-specific clinical decision support information at
    the point of prescribing, to retail and mail order pharmacy locations of
    the patient’s choice.
   No two medical practices are alike – evaluation
    of current processes is critical in determining
    best product and implementation plan
   Physicians learn by apprentice model – be sure
    there is a physician champion
   Evaluate requirements for physician training
    early and plan schedules to accommodate
    decreased productivity
   Workflow is a critical factor in success
   Staff roll in the prescribing process is a major
    influence on potential success and usually
    underestimated
   Time for training and implementation should be
    maximized (consider vendor recommendations
    as a MINIMUM)
When implementation of electronic prescribing is
  through a regional health information network
  new issues arise which include:
 Management of shared medication lists

 Management of shared problems lists

 Opportunity for aggregated medication history
  data
 Increased concerns about secondary use of
  prescriber data
   More options for stand alone, certified EMR and
    information network based electronic prescribing
    products
   Increased connectivity of pharmacies and PBMs
   Increased functionality to improve office efficiency
    (electronic refills)
   Support for implementation through programs like
    DOQ-IT and others
   Grant, P4P and other funding opportunities
   New educational material and resources are available
“We tried dedicating this computer to deciphering our
                doctors' handwriting."
                     Cartoon by Dave Harbaugh
Contact me at: pathale@pathalemd.com

Web site with further information and links:
www.pathalemd.com

						
Related docs
Other docs by wanghonghx
025-2008+bipolar+disorder+rh
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
pag03latina
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Semicolon_HANDOUT[1]
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0