Get documents about "Technology Handout
W
Description
Technology Handout document sample
Document Sample
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provide
1 between local and state agencies and the recommendations where needed to insure
CBP. the efficient and accurate transfer of data
between state agencies and the CBP.
a. AgNSRWG: The workgroup is co-
sponsoring a cover crop conference in
Ensuring BMPs are maintained to be as December and will continue to seek funding
2 efficient as they are reported to be. for several additional workshops on
economics and phosphorus management in
the coming year.
a. AgNSRWG: Enable local conservation
agencies to access CBP conservation
practice implementation data, water quality
Dealing with practices that may no longer be data, land use and other data sources
3 in place. through the COAST project tool or other
state systems. Mark Dubin is serving on the
COAST Development Team for agricultural
elements.
a. AgNSRWG: Completed review of all ag
BMPs under the UMD/MAWP BMP Project,
Ensuring we are all reporting the same thing
4 under the same name.
except for NUE BMP. Will complete review
of the NUE and provide recommendations to
NSC.
All a. AgNSRWG: Develop data procalls with
Workgroups the NEIEN data exchange templates with
USDA to ensure the risk of double counting
5 Quality assurance and quality control. of implemented conservation practices is
minimized. Mark Dubin is the lead on
developing the NEIEN data exchange
template with NRCS.
a. AgNSRWG: The workgroup is co-
sponsoring a cover crop conference for
6 Allocate funding based on performance. December of this year which will target
performance standards for state programs.
Capturing new, innovative, and non- a. AgNSRWG: Will identify opportunties
structural practices that are not tied to an with the private sector to encourage greater
7 organization or grant, do not fit into the partnership in tracking and reporting practice
database, and are therefore not tracked. implementation.
Provide input/feedback to Reeval. Tech.
Work Group re: their proposed
Need to ensure that decisions regarding
assumptions/recommendations re:
allocations and modeling various
8 categories of loads are reasonable and
CAFOs & SW loads (regualted & non- HIGH
regulated). And non-SW point sources? -
implementable.
Before this info. is presented to the
WQSC at Oct. 20th Conf. Call.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provide
1 between local and state agencies and the recommendations where needed to insure
CBP. the efficient and accurate transfer of data
between state agencies and the CBP.
a. AgNSRWG: The workgroup is co-
sponsoring a cover crop conference in
Ensuring BMPs are maintained to be as December and will continue to seek funding
2 efficient as they are reported to be. for several additional workshops on
economics and phosphorus management in
the coming year.
a. AgNSRWG: Enable local conservation
agencies to access CBP conservation
practice implementation data, water quality
Dealing with practices that may no longer be data, land use and other data sources
3 in place. through the COAST project tool or other
state systems. Mark Dubin is serving on the
COAST Development Team for agricultural
elements.
a. AgNSRWG: Completed review of all ag
BMPs under the UMD/MAWP BMP Project,
Ensuring we are all reporting the same thing
4 under the same name.
except for NUE BMP. Will complete review
of the NUE and provide recommendations to
NSC.
All a. AgNSRWG: Develop data procalls with
Workgroups the NEIEN data exchange templates with
USDA to ensure the risk of double counting
5 Quality assurance and quality control. of implemented conservation practices is
minimized. Mark Dubin is the lead on
developing the NEIEN data exchange
template with NRCS.
a. AgNSRWG: The workgroup is co-
sponsoring a cover crop conference for
6 Allocate funding based on performance. December of this year which will target
performance standards for state programs.
Capturing new, innovative, and non- a. AgNSRWG: Will identify opportunties
structural practices that are not tied to an with the private sector to encourage greater
7 organization or grant, do not fit into the partnership in tracking and reporting practice
database, and are therefore not tracked. implementation.
Provide input/feedback to Reeval. Tech.
Work Group re: their proposed
Need to ensure that decisions regarding
assumptions/recommendations re:
allocations and modeling various
8 categories of loads are reasonable and
CAFOs & SW loads (regualted & non- HIGH
regulated). And non-SW point sources? -
implementable.
Before this info. is presented to the
WQSC at Oct. 20th Conf. Call.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
a. Develop data procalls with the NEIEN
data exchange templates with USDA to
Address the risk of double counting BMPs ensure the risk of double counting of
9 with the NEIEN data exchange templates implemented conservation practices is
with USDA. minimized. Mark Dubin is the lead on
developing the NEIEN data exchange
template with NRCS.
a. Monitor USDA's progress on developing
data sharing guidance. Mark Dubin is the
10 lead on developing the NEIEN data
exchange template with NRCS.
b. Identify opportunities with the Bay
Address privacy/data sharing issues with the jurisdictions on how county conservation
agricultural sector. districts may be able to exchange
conservation practice implementation data
11 with agricultural consultants, agri-business
and agricultural organizations to capture non-
publically funded implementation.
a. Identify opportunties with the private
Capturing new, innovative conservation
sector to encourage greater partnership in
12 practices that are being implemented but are
tracking and reporting practice
not tracked or reported.
implementation.
Agricultural a. Incorporate into Phase 5 of the
Nutrient and Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model a
All watershedwide mass balance calculation
Sediment
Workgroups 13 method for determining potential nutrient
Reduction reductions from manure and poultry litter
Workgroup Capturing manure and poultry litter
tranportation.
transportation within and outside of the
b. Mark Dubin is the lead in gathering
watershed in order to capture where it is
information to determine the nutrient
going and where the release points are.
reduction mass balances from poultry litter
14 transport programs in MD and DE that
transport to PA. This information will be
presented at a future workgroup meeting.
a. Develop agricultural education and
outreach materials targeted to the
agricultural community, specifically to
consultants, agri-business and agricultural
organizations, to encourage trust, increase
Earning the trust of farmers who do not want
15 to be involved in government efforts.
cooperation, and expand opportunties for
tracking and reporting implemented
Expressing to farmers the benefits of
practices. Messages should include the
implementing and reporting agricultural
importance of local benefits and for
BMPs that will put a better face on
improving the public face of agriculture.
agriculture, and further express to all
localities in general the benefits to them.
b. Develop an agriculural communication
plan and supporting materials to
16 communicate CBP messages to the
agricultural community for improving
understanding and confidence.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
Develop data procalls with the NEIEN
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provideto
with USDA
1 between the risk ofstate agencies and the
Address local and double counting BMPs recommendationsdouble countingto insure
ensure the risk of where needed of
9 CBP. NEIEN data exchange templates
with the the efficient and accurate transfer of data
implemented conservation practices is
with USDA. minimized. Mark Dubin and lead on
between state agenciesis thethe CBP.
developing the NEIEN data exchange
template with NRCS.
a. Monitor USDA's progress on developing
data sharing guidance. Mark Dubin is the
10 lead on developing the NEIEN data
exchange template with NRCS.
b. Identify opportunities with the Bay
Address privacy/data sharing issues with the jurisdictions on how county conservation
agricultural sector. districts may be able to exchange
conservation practice implementation data
11 with agricultural consultants, agri-business
and agricultural organizations to capture non-
publically funded implementation.
a. Identify opportunties with the private
Capturing new, innovative conservation
sector to encourage greater partnership in
12 practices that are being implemented but are
tracking and reporting practice
not tracked or reported.
implementation.
Agricultural a. Incorporate into Phase 5 of the
Nutrient and Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model a
All watershedwide mass balance calculation
Sediment
Workgroups 13 method for determining potential nutrient
Reduction reductions from manure and poultry litter
Workgroup Capturing manure and poultry litter
tranportation.
transportation within and outside of the
b. Mark Dubin is the lead in gathering
watershed in order to capture where it is
information to determine the nutrient
going and where the release points are.
reduction mass balances from poultry litter
14 transport programs in MD and DE that
transport to PA. This information will be
presented at a future workgroup meeting.
a. Develop agricultural education and
outreach materials targeted to the
agricultural community, specifically to
consultants, agri-business and agricultural
organizations, to encourage trust, increase
Earning the trust of farmers who do not want
15 to be involved in government efforts.
cooperation, and expand opportunties for
tracking and reporting implemented
Expressing to farmers the benefits of
practices. Messages should include the
implementing and reporting agricultural
importance of local benefits and for
BMPs that will put a better face on
improving the public face of agriculture.
agriculture, and further express to all
localities in general the benefits to them.
b. Develop an agriculural communication
plan and supporting materials to
16 communicate CBP messages to the
agricultural community for improving
understanding and confidence.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
a. This issue should be introduced to the
Implmentation Committee for addressing at
a political discussion level. The AgNSRWG
will develop an agricultural communication
A negative connotation of the CBP is being
system in cooperation with the CBPO,
17 transmitted to farmers by the agricultural
USDA-NRCS and other partners to publish
associations.
and distribute targeted agricultural outreach
materials on the CBP to the agricultural
community, including agricultural
organizations.
a. Enable local conservation agencies to
access CBP conservation practice
Agricultural Convincing local conservation agencies of implementation data, water quality data, land
Nutrient and the importance to them for accurately and use and other data sources through the
Sediment 18 comprehensively track their conservation COAST project tool or other state systems.
Reduction efforts. Mark Dubin is serving on the COAST
Workgroup Development Team for agricultural
elements.
a. Develop agricultural education and
outreach materials targeted to the
agricultural community, specifically to
consultants, agri-business and agricultural
organizations, to encourage trust, increase
Lack of awareness about the importance of
19 tracking by the agricultural community.
cooperation, and expand opportunties for
tracking and reporting implemented
All practices. Messages should include the
Workgroups importance of local benefits and for
improving the public face of agriculture.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
This issue should be introduced to the
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange Committeeand addressing at
Implmentation templates for provide
1 between local and state agencies and the recommendations where needed to insure
a political discussion level. The AgNSRWG
CBP. will efficient an agricultural communication
the develop and accurate transfer of data
A negative connotation of the CBP is being between state agencies and the CBP.
system in cooperation with the CBPO,
17 transmitted to farmers by the agricultural
USDA-NRCS and other partners to publish
associations.
and distribute targeted agricultural outreach
materials on the CBP to the agricultural
community, including agricultural
organizations.
a. Enable local conservation agencies to
access CBP conservation practice
Agricultural Convincing local conservation agencies of implementation data, water quality data, land
Nutrient and the importance to them for accurately and use and other data sources through the
Sediment 18 comprehensively track their conservation COAST project tool or other state systems.
Reduction efforts. Mark Dubin is serving on the COAST
Workgroup Development Team for agricultural
elements.
a. Develop agricultural education and
outreach materials targeted to the
agricultural community, specifically to
consultants, agri-business and agricultural
organizations, to encourage trust, increase
Lack of awareness about the importance of
19 tracking by the agricultural community.
cooperation, and expand opportunties for
tracking and reporting implemented
All practices. Messages should include the
Workgroups importance of local benefits and for
improving the public face of agriculture.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
Riparian Specialist has been contacting
larger NGO partners to get 2008 miles, will
Capturing efforts of small volunteer groups mine grant reporting information for small
20 HIGH
and NGO partners volunteer group efforts. Future for data
collection is NEIEN reporting or CAP,
Forestry
current system has limited life.
Workgroup
a. Conducted conferences with all 6 states
including EPA (Burch), UMD (Sweeney),
Forest buffer implementation data is not
Riparian Specialist, and the various HIGH
consistently reported to CBP and FWG
reporting agencies within those states, to
21 discuss and rectify issue
Capturing non-significant industrial facilities a. Workgroup members will collect data
22 data which are only available through hard
copy permit applications
a. Work with Peter Claggett to use a hybrid
approach that uses existing sewer service
23 Projecting wastewater out to 2030 area data where available and Peter's
methodology for areas without better data
Wastewater
Treatment a. Follow up on WV's septic research
Workgroup report and MD's septic information system to
24 Reporting septic systems
come up with new recommendations for
tracking and reporting septic systems
Tracking wastewater treatment facility a. To be determined by the workgroup on
All
information including construction the November onference call meeting.
Workgroups 25 schedule,design/treatment technology and
cost information
a. Work with Jeff Sweeney and state
workgroup members to determine status of
26 Reporting nonpoint source urban BMPs December 2008 BMP data reporting to HIGH
CBPO
a. As BMP data is reported, work with Jeff
Sweeney and USWG to develop detailed list
of BMPs by categories reported by each
Adequately capturing and giving credit to state. Initiate discussion with local
27 local jurisdictions for the practices that they government to assure that similar BMP titles MEDIUM
have implemented in the urban sector / descriptions are being used - develop a list
of BMPs implemented and not credited by
CBPO.
Urban
Stormwater a. A representative from each state will
Workgroup provide a description of the following: 1)
Mechanism for tracking and reporting
stormwater BMPs to CBP; 2) Mechanism for
28 tracking maintenance; 3) Process for MEDIUM
tracking and reporting MS4 and non-MS4
Understanding the tracking and reporting BMPs; and 4) If no process exists, please
mechanisms in each CB watershed state. describe any plan to put it in place.
b. Develop a matrix that lists the regulatory
and non-regulatory requirements that are in
29 place in each jurisdiction, what sort of MEDIUM
coverage they have, etc.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will has been contacting ag
Riparian Specialist review NEIEN BMP
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provide will
larger NGO partners to get 2008 miles,
1 between local and state agencies and the
Capturing efforts of small volunteer groups recommendations where neededfor small
mine grant reporting information to insure
20 CBP. the efficient and efforts. Future forof data HIGH
and NGO partners volunteer group accurate transfer data
collection is NEIEN reporting or CBP.
between state agencies and the CAP,
Forestry
current system has limited life.
Workgroup
a. Conducted conferences with all 6 states
including EPA (Burch), UMD (Sweeney),
Forest buffer implementation data is not
Riparian Specialist, and the various HIGH
consistently reported to CBP and FWG
reporting agencies within those states, to
21 discuss and rectify issue
Capturing non-significant industrial facilities a. Workgroup members will collect data
22 data which are only available through hard
copy permit applications
a. Work with Peter Claggett to use a hybrid
approach that uses existing sewer service
23 Projecting wastewater out to 2030 area data where available and Peter's
methodology for areas without better data
Wastewater
Treatment a. Follow up on WV's septic research
Workgroup report and MD's septic information system to
24 Reporting septic systems
come up with new recommendations for
tracking and reporting septic systems
Tracking wastewater treatment facility a. To be determined by the workgroup on
All
information including construction the November onference call meeting.
Workgroups 25 schedule,design/treatment technology and
cost information
a. Work with Jeff Sweeney and state
workgroup members to determine status of
26 Reporting nonpoint source urban BMPs December 2008 BMP data reporting to HIGH
CBPO
a. As BMP data is reported, work with Jeff
Sweeney and USWG to develop detailed list
of BMPs by categories reported by each
Adequately capturing and giving credit to state. Initiate discussion with local
27 local jurisdictions for the practices that they government to assure that similar BMP titles MEDIUM
have implemented in the urban sector / descriptions are being used - develop a list
of BMPs implemented and not credited by
CBPO.
Urban
Stormwater a. A representative from each state will
Workgroup provide a description of the following: 1)
Mechanism for tracking and reporting
stormwater BMPs to CBP; 2) Mechanism for
28 tracking maintenance; 3) Process for MEDIUM
tracking and reporting MS4 and non-MS4
Understanding the tracking and reporting BMPs; and 4) If no process exists, please
mechanisms in each CB watershed state. describe any plan to put it in place.
b. Develop a matrix that lists the regulatory
and non-regulatory requirements that are in
29 place in each jurisdiction, what sort of MEDIUM
coverage they have, etc.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
All
Workgroups
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provide
1 between local and state agencies and the recommendations where needed to insure
CBP. the efficient and accurate transfer of data
between state agencies and the CBP.
All
Workgroups
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
a. Examine data sets from tidal Bay-partner
30
Sediment states to help determine how much we are
Tracking tidal region activities
Workgroup undercounting tidal region activities LOW
31
b. Track and report tidal region activities MEDIUM
a. Nonpoint source data submissions from
32 VA and MD through NEIEN that are MEDIUM
validated and complete.
Tackling issues involving the NEIEN
b. Nonpoint source data submission from
33 process MEDIUM
PA through NEIEN that are validated
c. Involve headwater states in the NEIEN if
34 MEDIUM
proposal is written, accepted, and funded
a. Workgroup and state-CBPO discussions
Watershed of sources of implementation data within
35 Risk of double counting BMPs LOW
states with emphasis on possible double-
Technical
counting
Workgroup a. WTWG, USWG, and state-CBPO
Adequately capturing and giving credit to discussions of stormwater data for the
36 local jurisdictions for the practices that they "2008" model assessment and Phase 5 LOW
have implemented in the urban sector calibration period with emphasis on
accuracy of information submitted
a. Review and evaluate needs for updating
All Understanding the tracking and reporting state Quality Assurance Project Plans
37 LOW
mechanisms in each CB watershed state (QAPP) for nonpoint source implementation
Workgroups
data
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provide
a. Examine data sets from tidal Bay-partner
30
Sediment 1 between local and state agencies and the states to help determine needed to insure
recommendations wherehow much we are *Report
Tracking tidal region activities
Workgroup CBP. the efficient and accurate transfer of data
undercounting tidal region activities LOW Progress
between state agencies and the CBP. *Report
31
b. Track and report tidal region activities MEDIUM Progress
a. Nonpoint source data submissions from
32 VA and MD through NEIEN that are MEDIUM
validated and complete.
Tackling issues involving the NEIEN
b. Nonpoint source data submission from
33 process MEDIUM
PA through NEIEN that are validated
c. Involve headwater states in the NEIEN if
34 MEDIUM
proposal is written, accepted, and funded
a. Workgroup and state-CBPO discussions
Watershed of sources of implementation data within
35 Risk of double counting BMPs LOW
states with emphasis on possible double-
Technical
counting
Workgroup a. WTWG, USWG, and state-CBPO
Adequately capturing and giving credit to discussions of stormwater data for the
36 local jurisdictions for the practices that they "2008" model assessment and Phase 5 LOW
have implemented in the urban sector calibration period with emphasis on
accuracy of information submitted
a. Review and evaluate needs for updating
All Understanding the tracking and reporting state Quality Assurance Project Plans
37 LOW
mechanisms in each CB watershed state (QAPP) for nonpoint source implementation
Workgroups
data
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2008
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec
a. Support NEIEN efforts by developing
38 NEIEN protocols at the local level and
Improving reporting tools , processes, and transmit the information electronically
Nutrient approaches b. Highlight jurisdictions' successes to help
Subcommittee 39 others move forward (ex. Upper
Susquehanna Coalition approach)
Prioritizing the issues and barriers that need a. Review of the tracking/reporting
40
addressing assignments table.
Resolving conflicts between the States'
Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grants
41 HIGH
conditions and deliverables and the CBP's
grant guidance.
Improving coordination between CBPO and
42 EPA Region 3 regarding what is required in MEDIUM
the NEIEN grants.
a. Look at the value of historic data and
come back to the NSC with
Capturing historical data (which is often not
43 recommendations on whether to spend time LOW
electronic)
gathering this data or to move forward with
new efforts.
b. Investigate whether it will be possible for
Addressing staffing concerns (Jurisdictions
CBP to help provide staffing to the
44 typically lack the necessary resources and MEDIUM
jurisdictions to collect and compile date.
staff to collect and compile data)
Chesapeake Bay
All
a. Look into the list of air BMPs that were
Program Office
Workgroups
45 LOW
Tracking air BMPs put together years ago by an air ad hoc
Staff Support group.
Addressing concerns regarding CBP's a. Set a deadline when data must be
reporting deadline (end of calendar year reported to CBP that is suitable for CBP as
46 HIGH
deadline, effectiveness of twice yearly well as jurisdictions.
reporting)
a. Put in a firewall, such as latitude and
47 Preventing double counting longitude coordinates, to prevent double HIGH
counting
a. Develop a centralized database in all of
48 MEDIUM
Improving data reporting tools and the states.
approaches b. Coordinate private sector and state
49 LOW
tracking and reporting systems.
Resolving the issue with NRCS BMP
implementation reporting as it iis currently
50 HIGH
done and the technical issues with NEIEN
node data transmission in the future.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
CBP Nutrient Subcommittee
Work Group Data Tracking and Reporting Assignments
Actions and Schedule List (as of 11/18/08)
2009
Workgroup(s) No. Issues Actions Priority Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
a. AgNSRWG: Will review NEIEN BMP ag
Support NEIEN efforts by developing
38 Inefficient transfer of tracking information data exchange templates and provide
NEIEN protocols at the local level and
1 Improving reporting tools , processes, the
between local and state agencies and and recommendations where needed to insure
transmit the information electronically
Nutrient CBP.
approaches b. Highlight and accurate transfer of data
the efficient jurisdictions' successes to help
Subcommittee 39 between state agencies and the CBP.
others move forward (ex. Upper
Susquehanna Coalition approach)
Prioritizing the issues and barriers that need a. Review of the tracking/reporting
40
addressing assignments table.
Resolving conflicts between the States'
Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grants
41 HIGH
conditions and deliverables and the CBP's
grant guidance.
Improving coordination between CBPO and
42 EPA Region 3 regarding what is required in MEDIUM
the NEIEN grants.
a. Look at the value of historic data and
come back to the NSC with
Capturing historical data (which is often not
43 recommendations on whether to spend time LOW
electronic)
gathering this data or to move forward with
new efforts.
b. Investigate whether it will be possible for
Addressing staffing concerns (Jurisdictions
CBP to help provide staffing to the
44 typically lack the necessary resources and MEDIUM
jurisdictions to collect and compile date.
staff to collect and compile data)
Chesapeake Bay
All
a. Look into the list of air BMPs that were
Program Office
Workgroups
45 LOW
Tracking air BMPs put together years ago by an air ad hoc
Staff Support group.
Addressing concerns regarding CBP's a. Set a deadline when data must be
reporting deadline (end of calendar year reported to CBP that is suitable for CBP as
46 HIGH
deadline, effectiveness of twice yearly well as jurisdictions.
reporting)
a. Put in a firewall, such as latitude and
47 Preventing double counting longitude coordinates, to prevent double HIGH
counting
a. Develop a centralized database in all of
48 MEDIUM
Improving data reporting tools and the states.
approaches b. Coordinate private sector and state
49 LOW
tracking and reporting systems.
Resolving the issue with NRCS BMP
implementation reporting as it iis currently
50 HIGH
done and the technical issues with NEIEN
node data transmission in the future.
C:\Docstoc\Working\pdf\1e1c5a02-2f3f-469e-9636-a81de0e927a5.xls
Related docs
Other docs by pgc86492
Technology Integration Lesson 3.6 Example Strategy for Problem Solving Software
Views: 17 | Downloads: 0
