2009 Preliminary EOG & EOC Data July 7, 2009
Changes in Reporting This Year
EOG and EOC tests had completed its 3-year period re-norming by 2008 This data is preliminary only Final DPI results may change slightly EOG retest 1 scores are being included for the first time in state accountability system EOC retest 1 scores aren’t included this year The percent proficient is used in this report
2.
Preliminary EOG Results 2009
3.
Overview of 2009 EOG Results
Reading and math scores increased at all grade levels, 3-8 District-wide reading = 11.3 percentage point gain District-wide math = 9.6 percentage point gain District-wide science = 13.4 percentage point gain for grade 5 District-wide science = 10.1 percentage point gain for grade 8
4
More on preliminary EOG info
49 elementary and middle schools = > 10 percentage point gains in reading and math 11 elementary and middle schools = > 15 percentage point gains in reading and math
◦ Kirkman Park, Triangle Lake, Guilford, Brightwood, Cone, Erwin, Bessemer, Sumner and Vandalia elementary schools; Ferndale and Allen middle schools
Achievement gap between African-American and white students has narrowed
5.
EOG Results as Measured by Percent Proficient: 2008 vs. 2009
100
79.9
80
65.6
60
70.3
72.3
56.9 54.3
40
20
0
Reading 2008 2009 regular test
Math 2009 regular test and retest 1
6.
Achievement Gap Size: 2008 vs. 2009
100
80
60
40
37.1 33.1 29.3 20.5 19.8 22.6 18.4 13.8
20
0
Reading
Math
2008 W - AA
2009 W - AA
2008 FRL (W - AA)
2009 FRL (W - AA)
7.
2009 EOG Reading by Grade
2008
Regular
2009
Regular & Retest 1
Number Tested
2009 Total Retest 1 2008 Total
Group Grade % Prof. % Prof. Gain: 08-09 % Prof. Gain: 08-09
All all All All All All All All
8.
54.3 56.9 52.1 55.2 55.8 56.2 54.4 56.3 61.0 61.7 52.0 56.6 51.2 55.5
2.6 3.1 .4 1.9 .8 4.5 4.3
65.6 63.7 64.1 66.0 70.6 65.8 63.4
11.3 11.6 8.3 11.6 9.6 13.7 12.2
32597 11294 32482 5605 5403 5523 5333 5303 5430 1964 5443 1874 5504 2042 5337 1585 5231 1838 5190 1991 5500
3 4 5 6 7 8
2009 EOG Reading Results by Group
2008
Regular
2009
Regular & Retest 1
Number Tested
2009 Total Retest 1 2008 Total
Group Grade % Prof. % Prof. Gain: 08-09 % Prof. Gain: 08-09
All all AA all AI AS H all all all
54.3 56.9 37.6 40.7 49.7 55.0 57.8 59.7 38.8 42.9 56.7 59.5 74.7 76.6
2.6 3.1 5.3 2.0 4.1 2.7 2.0
65.6 50.7 61.3 67.1 52.6 68.4 83.8
11.3 13.1 11.6 9.3 13.8 11.6 9.2
32597 11294 32482 13489 160 1702 2885 1697 12664 6393 13503 52 161
517 1733 1291 2786 560 1563 2481 12723
M all W
9.
all
2009 EOG Reading Results by Status
2008
Regular Group
2009
Regular & Retest 1
Number Tested
2009 Total Retest 1 2008 Total
Grade % Prof. % Prof. Gain: 08-09 % Prof. Gain: 08-09
non FRL FRL non LEP LEP non SWD SWD
10.
all all all all all all
71.6 74.3 36.9 40.2 56.6 59.5 21.8 26.8 58.9 61.8 28.0 30.2
2.7 3.3 2.9 5.0 2.9 2.2
81.8 49.9 68.1 35.3 70.4 39.5
10.2 13.1 11.6 13.5 11.5 11.5
16000 16597 30059 2538 26731 4915
3531 16292 7763 16140 9917 29622 1377 2249
8480 27620 2492 4812
2009 EOG Math Results by Grade
2008
Regular Test Group
2009
Regular & Retest 1
Number Tested
2009 Toatl Retest 1 2008 Total
Grade % Prof. % Prof. Gain: 09-08 % Prof. Gain: 09-08
All all All All All All All All
11.
70.3 72.3 72.8 73.3 71.7 72.9 71.6 73.1 70.8 70.6 68.9 72.6 66.5 71.3
2.0 .5 1.2 1.5 -.2 3.6 4.8
79.9 80.5 80.0 80.0 79.1 79.7 80.2
9.6 7.7 8.3 8.4 8.4 10.8 13.7
32655 5621 5409 5534 5337 5307 5447
7498 32503 1228 5416 1198 5484 1277 5356 1315 5251 1194 5203 1286 5517
3 4 5 6 7 8
2009 EOG Math Results by Group
2008
Regular Test
2009
Regular & Retest 1
Number Tested
2009 Total Retest 1 2008 Total
Group Grade % Prof. % Prof. Gain: 08-09 % Prof. Gain: 08-09
All AA AI AS H M W
12.
all all all all all all all
70.3 72.3 56.1 58.9 62.1 68.1 80.1 76.6 63.6 66.8 72.1 74.0 85.4 87.0
2.0 2.8 6.0 -3.5 3.3 1.9 1.6
79.9 68.9 78.1 85.5 76.9 81.7 91.5
9.6 12.7 16.0 5.5 13.3 9.5 6.0
32655 13500 160 1736 2896 1696 12667
7498 32503 4644 13500 35 161
262 1742 817 2797 376 1565 1364 12725
2009 EOG Math Results by Status
2008
Regular Test Group
2009
Regular & Retest 1
Number Tested
2009 Total Retest 1 2008 Total
Grade % Prof. % Prof. Gain: 08-09 % Prof. Gain: 08-09
non FRL FRL non LEP LEP non SWD SWD
13.
all all all all all all
83.3 85.6 57.6 59.6 71.3 73.9 55.2 54.8 74.5 76.5 47.3 49.3
2.3 1.9 2.6 -.4 2.0 2.0
90.6 69.7 81.0 68.0 83.7 59.7
7.3 12.1 9.6 12.8 9.2 12.4
16013 16642 30058 2597 26793 4911
1958 16241 5540 16093 6600 29534 898 2239 5363 27544 1905 4790
2009 Science Results
2008 Regular Grade 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Group All AA AI AS H M W All AA AI AS H M W % Prof. 42.5 21.6 47.6 51.1 29.2 45.2 64.9 51.2 29.5 42.3 58.4 35.9 56.8 76.4 % Prof. 47.0 27.7 30.0 51.2 30.7 47.5 70.1 54.5 35.4 47.8 53.2 46.8 59.5 76.9 Gain: 08-09 4.5 6.1 -17.6 .1 1.5 2.3 5.2 3.3 5.9 5.5 -5.3 10.9 2.7 .4 2009 Regular & Retest 1 % Prof. 55.8 35.9 40.0 60.7 39.4 58.5 79.2 61.3 43.5 52.2 60.4 53.7 64.7 82.5 Gain: 08-09 13.4 14.3 -7.6 9.6 10.3 13.3 14.3 10.1 14.0 9.9 2.0 17.8 7.9 6.0 Total 5557 2238 30 285 525 282 2197 5479 2348 23 316 434 238 2120 Number Tested 2009 Retest 1 1759 918 11 88 199 89 454 1617 981 7 82 135 65 347 2008 Total 5098 2045 21 313 449 259 2010 5272 2268 26 267 407 206 2092
14.
Preliminary EOC Results 2009
15.
Overview of 2009 EOC Results
GCS students gained in 6/10 EOCs 11 of 25 high schools = > 5 percentage point gains 5 of 25 high schools = > 10 percentage point gains
◦ The Academy at Smith, The Academy at Central, The Middle College at N.C. A&T, The Middle College at GTCC - High Point, Southeast High
U.S. History (7.7) Chemistry (7.1) and Geometry (4.7) progressed significantly
1
16.
Composite score gains
Composite score for 10 EOCs = 1.6 percentage point gain
Gain greater for ethnic groups
◦ ◦ American Indian gained 4.3 percentage points African-American gained 3.1 percentage points
◦
Hispanic gained 3.1 percentage points
Other AYP subgroups
◦ LEP = 4.4 percentage point increase
◦
◦
17.
FRL = 2.9 percentage point increase
SWD = 0.3 percentage point increase
EOC Composite: 2008 vs. 2009
100
81.0 78.2 70.6 70.7 63.0 61.4 47.2 44.1 60.8 56.5 55.9 52.7 67.4 66.9
80
60
40
20
0
All
AA 2008
AI
AS
H
M 2009
W
18.
Composite EOC Gaps: 2008 vs. 2009
100
80
60
40
34.1 33.8 25.5 25.1 21.7 20.2 10.4 7.5 11.3 13.6
20
0
W-AA
W-AI 2008
W-AS
W-H 2009
W-M
19.
2009 EOC Results by Subject
Percent Proficient EOC Algebra I English I Biology Civics & Economics US History Algebra II Geometry Physical Science Chemistry Physics
20.
Number Tested 2008 6752 6587 5522 5802 4940 3976 4879 3105 2372 322 2009 7581 6742 6142 6279 5157 3402 4757 2474 2524 362 Dif: 08-09 829 155 620 477 217 -574 -122 -631 152 40
2008 55.4 67.1 64.1 65.5 64.0 58.4 60.4 46.4 66.0 83.2
2009 54.6 65.7 64.7 65.4 71.7 59.0 65.1 42.8 73.1 84.5
Gain: 08-09 -.8 -1.4 .6 -.1 7.7 .6 4.7 -3.6 7.1 1.3
Challenges and next steps
Continuing to increase elementary and middle school students’ EOG reading achievement More rapid growth needed in high school student achievement to meet new graduation standards Better student growth in Algebra 1, English II, Civics and Economics, Physical Science Closing the achievement gaps in both EOGs and EOCs
◦ Particularly reading EOG; and, 5 major EOCs between students of color and white students, socio-economically disadvantaged students and white students.
21.
Thank You!
22.
2009 Preliminary EOG & EOC Data July 7, 2009
23.