Get documents about "SETE scores
Document Sample
CourseID2 coursenumber section iname #RESPONSES #ENROLLED overall oem
ACCT 3110 90 Cheryl Prachyl 21 25 775 797
ACCT 3120 90 Brianne Elizabeth Lowrie 10 16 772 757
ACCT 3405 90 Brianne Elizabeth Lowrie 11 33 838 786
ACCT 4270 90 Cheryl Prachyl 13 14 808 726
ACCT 4400 90 Cheryl Prachyl 10 11 776 687
AECO 4000 90 LaCrisia Rochelle Gilbert 5 17 832 804
AECO 4120 90 Rhonda Dionne Wilkinson-Ja 13 30 793 750
AECO 4420 90 Leslie Rae Roberts 3 17 836 803
AECO 4980 90 James David Renfro 7 24 860 838
AECO 4120 91 Leslie Rae Roberts 4 16 857 791
AECO 4020 92 James David Renfro 15 33 835 795
AGER 4500 90 Iftekhar Amin 12 16 768 751
AGER 4550 90 Iftekhar Amin 26 34 758 733
AGER 4560 90 Iftekhar Amin 13 16 777 733
ART 1300 90 Pamela Jean Harris 9 20 804 837
ART 1300 91 Pamela Jean Harris 13 19 839 828
ART 1300 92 Pamela Jean Harris 14 29 824 784
BCIS 3610 90 Theodore L Larson 23 47 687 779
BCIS 3610 91 Theodore L Larson 9 36 764 833
BIOL 1132 90 Elizabeth S Vise 2 12 798 790
BIOL 1710 90 David Arden Tanner 4 11 834 806
BIOL 1730 90 David Arden Tanner 4 12 848 804
BIOL 1082 91 Elizabeth S Vise 7 13 745 789
BIOL 1132 91 David Arden Tanner 15 23 824 815
BIOL 1710 91 Elizabeth S Vise 3 12 794 761
BIOL 1730 91 Elizabeth S Vise 3 7 814 784
BIOL 1710 290 David Arden Tanner 4 10 850 789
BIOL 1710 291 Elizabeth S Vise 3 13 829 786
BIOL 1132 390 Elizabeth S Vise 5 12 788 799
BIOL 1082 391 Elizabeth S Vise 8 13 755 828
BIOL 1132 391 David Arden Tanner 19 23 832 850
BLAW 3430 92 Sharon Lee Fjordbak 33 41 873 831
BUSI 4940 90 Elizabeth J Muniz 14 36 863 780
CHEM 1360 90 Jeffery Scott Thomas Gorma 3 3 822 814
CHEM 1410 90 Ruifeng Ray Liu 2 9 821 801
CHEM 1430 90 Ruifeng Ray Liu 2 8 848 801
CHEM 1360 91 Jeffery Scott Thomas Gorma 5 6 839 816
CHEM 1410 290 Ruifeng Ray Liu 3 9 812 822
CHEM 1360 390 Jeffery Scott Thomas Gorma 2 3 834 812
CHEM 1430 390 Ruifeng Ray Liu 1 8 832 799
CHEM 1360 391 Jeffery Scott Thomas Gorma 4 6 816 801
CJUS 2100 90 Gretchen Hackard Choe 21 31 828 827
CJUS 3210 90 Gretchen Hackard Choe 20 42 878 809
CJUS 3340 90 Brenda S. Hankinson 16 47 790 747
CJUS 3600 90 Vidisha Barua Worley 15 49 834 810
CJUS 3630 90 Tiffiney Y Barfield-Cottle 23 71 781 805
CJUS 3700 90 Vidisha Barua Worley 17 47 745 799
CJUS 4200 90 Gretchen Hackard Choe 13 39 842 775
CJUS 4460 90 Richard Nolan Holden 9 22 792 740
CJUS 4500 90 Soraya Karin Kawucha 17 45 851 801
CJUS 4660 90 Tiffiney Y Barfield-Cottle 14 33 712 789
CJUS 4700 90 Vidisha Barua Worley 10 33 811 852
CJUS 4901 90 Tiffiney Y Barfield-Cottle 9 29 834 793
CJUS 5800 90 Gretchen Hackard Choe 6 14 839 782
CJUS 3400 90 Tiffiney Y Barfield-Cottle 21 49 778 765
CJUS 3630 91 Arrick L. Jackson 5 10 822 809
CJUS 4500 91 Richard Nolan Holden 3 18 818 794
COMM 1010 90 Natalia Kovalyova 7 16 775 767
COMM 1010 91 Natalia Kovalyova 7 13 756 783
COMS 4300 90 Joy Dale Patton 9 11 859 817
COMS 4500 90 Joy Dale Patton 15 23 838 759
COMS 4300 91 Joy Dale Patton 6 12 830 775
COUN 5200 90 Amy L McCortney 5 7 779 778
COUN 5300 90 Eric James Green 8 8 843 731
COUN 5660 90 Christopher Stephen Simpso 4 10 792 729
COUN 5670 90 Kristin Kalynn Meany-Walen 4 16 785 780
COUN 5680 90 Eric James Green 5 14 812 812
COUN 5710 90 Jennifer Nalini Baggerly 6 14 814 795
COUN 5720 90 Yu-fen Lin 5 6 758 777
COUN 5721 90 Yu-fen Lin 2 2 828 809
COUN 5740 90 Yu-fen Lin 4 6 808 703
COUN 5790 90 Yu-fen Lin 6 9 835 758
COUN 5900 90 Jennifer Nalini Baggerly 1 4 832 799
COUN 5690 91 Eric James Green 2 6 790 774
COUN 5690 92 Ryan Patrick Holliman 7 9 827 821
CSCE 1030 90 Feng-Jen Yang 1 3 832 792
CSCE 1045 90 Feng-Jen Yang 8 10 771 789
CSCE 3535 90 Ying Liu 21 25 829 783
CSCE 4010 90 Feng-Jen Yang 12 17 766 818
CSCE 4355 90 Feng-Jen Yang 16 19 818 827
CSCE 4560 90 Ying Liu 15 16 836 841
CSCE 4905 90 Ying Liu 24 25 833 776
CSCE 1030 390 Feng-Jen Yang 1 3 830 794
DFST 1013 90 Jennifer Nalini Baggerly 12 23 877 804
DSCI 2710 90 Theodore L Larson 12 56 676 741
DSCI 3710 90 Daniel D Friesen 27 40 807 774
DSCI 5180 90 Daniel D Friesen 8 10 844 812
DSCI 2710 91 Daniel D Friesen 25 41 839 809
ECON 1100 90 John David Wong 16 28 748 669
ECON 1110 90 John David Wong 9 13 847 747
ECON 4020 91 Kevin Paul Hallett 10 26 847 813
EDAD 5610 50 George Woodrow 12 17 769 872
EDAD 5620 50 George Woodrow 14 17 771 844
EDAD 5330 90 Douglas W Shouse 10 11 833 824
EDAD 5400 90 Howard Kevan Dunlop 10 11 833 799
EDAD 5500 90 Douglas W Shouse 3 11 791 797
EDAD 5600 90 Georgetta Johnson 11 15 792 780
EDAD 5610 90 Warren Gordon Ortloff 9 15 725 767
EDAD 5620 90 Howard Kevan Dunlop 14 15 811 803
EDAD 5630 90 George Woodrow 19 22 823 811
EDAD 5650 90 Georgetta Johnson 6 12 823 854
EDAD 5680 90 Lesley Kay Forsythe 5 18 836 777
EDAD 5700 90 Douglas W Shouse 5 9 866 787
EDAD 5400 91 Howard Kevan Dunlop 13 13 829 812
EDAD 5610 91 Warren Gordon Ortloff 8 15 773 800
EDAD 5650 91 Georgetta Johnson 2 6 823 829
EDAD 5700 91 Douglas W Shouse 1 9 825 780
EDAD 5300 92 Warren Gordon Ortloff 3 11 803 788
EDAD 5400 92 Howard Kevan Dunlop 7 8 839 752
EDAD 5650 92 Georgetta Johnson 9 17 881 792
EDAD 5700 92 George Woodrow 3 10 846 783
EDBE 3470 90 Ruth J Guevara 6 17 856 767
EDBE 3480 90 Jacqueline Elena Romano 6 10 800 738
EDBE 4480 90 Oscar Figueroa 19 29 832 784
EDBE 3470 91 Azucena Garcia 11 23 738 784
EDBE 3480 92 Jacqueline Elena Romano 24 30 808 734
EDEC 3613 90 Nancy H Beaver 7 24 811 774
EDEC 4633 90 Ruth J Guevara 25 47 800 763
EDEC 4633 91 Karen Jean Walker 9 14 816 741
EDEE 3320 90 Lesley Kay Forsythe 22 31 829 755
EDEE 3380 90 Ana Coca 18 19 749 705
EDEE 4330 90 Paula Denise Johnson 16 20 772 787
EDEE 4340 90 Rhonda L. Vincent 16 18 880 809
EDEE 4350 90 Gwendolyn Joy Johnson 17 23 880 822
EDEE 4330 91 Laura Marissa Pena 17 22 601 829
EDEE 4340 91 Rhonda L. Vincent 18 22 880 829
EDEE 4350 91 Gwendolyn Joy Johnson 18 22 882 827
EDEE 4101 780 Ruth J Guevara 2 6 837 802
EDEE 4102 781 Acela H. Paliotta 2 6 793 812
EDRE 4450 90 Makita LaShell Gillespie 20 31 829 784
EDRE 4850 90 Cynthia Deanne Rodriguez 22 24 798 761
EDRE 4860 90 Cynthia Deanne Rodriguez 18 18 859 757
EDRE 4870 90 Ruth J Guevara 5 10 796 777
EDRE 4860 91 Cynthia Deanne Rodriguez 18 22 861 796
EDSE 3800 90 Lesley Kay Forsythe 5 16 859 802
EDSE 4070 90 Jacqueline Elena Romano 5 9 823 613
EDSE 4840 90 Ali Shaqlaih 8 9 811 797
EDSE 4108 780 Lesley Kay Forsythe 1 3 832 799
EDSE 4118 780 Lesley Kay Forsythe 1 3 832 799
EDSP 4320 90 Judy Annette Anderson 10 18 804 741
EDSP 4330 90 Janice Jeanette Seabrooks- 13 14 806 673
EDSP 4340 90 Janice Jeanette Seabrooks- 15 15 820 780
EDSP 4360 90 Janice Jeanette Seabrooks- 12 12 866 771
EDSP 3210 91 Martha M Walter 11 19 887 799
ENGL 1313 90 Kate Brown Warrington 13 17 859 829
ENGL 1323 90 Cindy Elaine King 5 13 728 775
ENGL 2210 90 Cindy Elaine King 11 21 690 713
ENGL 1323 91 Cindy Elaine King 4 6 684 753
ENGL 1313 92 Kate Brown Warrington 16 22 872 821
EPSY 5210 90 Cody Jean Hargrave Arvidso 6 12 733 730
FINA 3770 90 Kevin Paul Hallett 11 26 886 847
FINA 4310 91 Chialing Hsieh 21 24 860 837
FINA 4400 91 Chialing Hsieh 31 39 837 817
FINA 3770 92 Kevin Paul Hallett 20 39 818 820
FINA 3770 93 Chialing Hsieh 7 10 844 850
HIST 2610 90 Matthew Mclaurine Babcock 9 14 783 738
HIST 2620 90 Matthew Mclaurine Babcock 12 24 776 846
HIST 2610 91 Matthew Mclaurine Babcock 9 16 726 882
HIST 2620 91 Norwood Henry Andrews 6 18 839 773
HSML 3000 90 Constance L Lacy 24 33 744 776
HSML 4000 90 Constance L Lacy 12 21 837 808
HSML 3000 91 Amanda Coleman-Mason 20 33 762 795
HSML 3000 98 Amanda Coleman-Mason 17 30 813 799
KINE 3550 90 Stephen E Stork 17 45 733 673
KINE 3550 91 Stephen E Stork 19 42 777 764
LING 4030 90 Marco Shappeck 6 8 868 787
LING 3060 91 Marco Shappeck 32 39 839 773
LING 4030 91 Marco Shappeck 14 19 860 821
LSCM 3960 90 Subhro Mitra 8 8 826 738
LSCM 4530 90 Scott A Ames 14 18 842 827
LTEC 4100 90 Deborah J Gallagher 17 23 850 826
LTEC 4100 91 Angela Washington-Blair 18 22 834 816
MATH 1010 90 Byungik Kahng 10 20 856 777
MATH 1100 90 Mehmet Celik 16 23 829 843
MATH 1190 90 Mehmet Celik 22 29 859 798
MATH 1350 90 Gwendolyn Joy Johnson 2 6 794 788
MATH 1650 90 Vinod Kumar Arya 5 11 800 732
MATH 1710 90 Byungik Kahng 5 6 846 811
MATH 1780 90 Byungik Kahng 6 7 825 742
MATH 2700 90 Noureen Ara Khan 7 12 814 792
MATH 2730 90 Mehmet Celik 7 8 831 804
MATH 3000 90 Noureen Ara Khan 22 23 787 733
MATH 4050 90 Ali Shaqlaih 5 7 817 759
MATH 4060 90 Ali Shaqlaih 6 8 830 802
MATH 1010 91 Vinod Kumar Arya 4 22 757 778
MATH 1100 91 Noureen Ara Khan 3 7 798 813
MATH 1710 290 Byungik Kahng 5 6 844 787
MGMT 3330 90 Elizabeth J Muniz 15 31 817 829
MGMT 3720 90 Ayse Banu Goktan Bilhan 19 32 811 806
MGMT 3830 90 Subhro Mitra 29 34 773 688
MGMT 3850 90 Jane Anne Bryant 6 29 808 760
MGMT 3860 90 Elizabeth J Muniz 15 28 857 805
MGMT 3880 90 Lisa M Russell 13 28 819 822
MGMT 4470 90 Patricia Smallwood 16 42 761 760
MGMT 4660 90 Ayse Banu Goktan Bilhan 16 27 799 827
MGMT 4890 90 Kevin Thomas White 13 40 777 841
MGMT 5140 90 Elizabeth J Muniz 6 12 852 843
MGMT 5710 90 Patricia Smallwood 11 22 746 768
MGMT 3720 91 Scott A Ames 7 8 862 815
MGMT 3830 91 Subhro Mitra 6 8 836 749
MGMT 4660 91 Ayse Banu Goktan Bilhan 8 21 852 791
MKTG 3010 90 Laura Serviere 31 44 838 763
MKTG 3650 90 Laura Serviere 37 44 833 841
MKTG 3650 91 Laura Serviere 26 31 827 832
MKTG 3650 92 Scott A Ames 12 18 847 817
PSCI 1040 91 Walter Francis Borges 14 31 816 777
PSCI 1050 91 Walter Francis Borges 13 19 788 855
PSCI 1040 92 Walter Francis Borges 14 22 760 812
PSYC 1630 90 Suzanne Chris Manning-McGa 13 19 880 848
PSYC 3620 90 Madeline Rex-Lear 23 41 843 797
REAL 2100 90 Thomas C Terrell 11 19 882 785
RHAB 3000 90 Amanda Coleman-Mason 18 29 838 804
RHAB 3900 90 Constance L Lacy 18 22 783 714
RHAB 3975 90 Todd Gomez 11 33 809 748
RHAB 4075 90 Todd Gomez 12 35 800 819
RHAB 4175 90 Phillip Anthony Ortiz 13 38 833 811
RHAB 4475 90 Gloria H Jackson 9 23 821 798
RHAB 3000 91 Todd Gomez 6 22 765 799
RHAB 4075 91 Todd Gomez 8 30 837 818
SOCI 1510 90 David Robert Forde 22 43 790 736
SOCI 2070 90 Steven Lawrence Arxer 13 27 819 822
SOCI 3000 90 Syeda Sarah Jesmin 27 50 696 669
SOCI 3120 90 Syeda Sarah Jesmin 36 60 689 609
SOCI 3200 90 Jessica Augusta Crowe 46 51 813 771
SOCI 3220 90 Jessica Augusta Crowe 53 60 743 771
SOCI 3240 90 Helen F Potts 17 25 832 821
SOCI 3280 90 Helen F Potts 11 39 855 762
SOCI 4240 90 Helen F Potts 34 60 829 783
SOCI 4250 90 Steven Lawrence Arxer 19 30 837 791
SOCI 4340 90 Syeda Sarah Jesmin 17 38 739 712
SOCI 4350 90 Jessica Augusta Crowe 39 47 822 803
SOCI 4540 90 Steven Lawrence Arxer 44 57 793 806
SOCI 3220 91 David Robert Forde 34 58 736 785
SOCI 3330 91 Helen F Potts 22 35 873 844
SOWK 3500 90 Constance L Lacy 14 21 814 812
SOWK 4540 90 Dana Sharmon Mitchell 34 40 865 853
SPAN 1010 90 Maria Del puy Ciriza-lope 6 6 880 807
SPAN 2040 90 Maria Del puy Ciriza-lope 3 5 844 801
SPAN 1010 390 Maria Del puy Ciriza-lope 6 6 880 807
TECM 1200 90 Natalia Kovalyova 5 6 779 758
TECM 2700 90 Kate Brown Warrington 22 30 821 793
le srl
828 788
792 824
839 829
879 817
853 831
781 840
825 891
798 826
761 833
813 827
766 888
831 780
855 804
793 865
792 792
824 789
797 844
738 753
822 760
838 777
806 822
798 830
803 839
773 831
846 796
826 785
790 852
845 850
776 796
754 841
782 812
820 818
815 850
823 761
797 821
805 820
805 824
802 800
805 807
804 815
840 787
788 780
795 843
840 853
765 853
755 793
749 784
825 829
781 818
830 819
768 841
765 782
762 854
807 817
797 839
771 858
828 794
823 811
780 842
797 849
823 853
832 808
808 822
843 886
819 875
830 749
790 824
796 815
800 800
822 794
880 792
820 805
804 815
823 802
789 825
808 809
830 791
771 846
775 825
788 845
756 787
797 865
795 811
805 852
753 824
810 786
826 808
760 887
807 849
823 851
774 842
713 790
781 791
787 812
811 817
779 815
787 839
893 732
775 825
792 839
782 791
821 826
823 836
785 822
790 823
785 814
835 801
822 792
780 892
803 846
809 828
858 841
852 848
843 820
765 814
868 878
832 813
806 845
853 832
870 805
826 850
821 861
818 844
809 830
603 855
780 862
797 847
822 827
785 819
834 851
800 842
870 861
740 896
801 869
799 817
883 889
777 795
804 815
804 815
822 834
868 865
816 837
802 853
807 855
757 843
798 795
822 807
769 841
830 795
730 890
772 835
810 821
801 809
793 782
791 772
849 771
801 725
739 713
805 856
783 824
785 830
745 836
756 885
859 842
855 782
824 846
842 836
785 840
839 815
790 829
808 851
803 846
825 859
796 756
837 808
790 812
891 773
824 817
844 831
819 809
784 821
848 814
818 811
813 793
787 804
828 753
848 798
761 828
821 806
836 860
844 787
875 781
803 779
860 778
788 760
756 803
816 780
786 865
800 833
832 815
763 889
835 863
769 803
785 828
801 783
794 811
778 747
858 690
772 816
834 812
810 863
814 863
841 829
767 915
773 801
813 822
813 837
833 764
769 825
851 819
762 838
852 858
955 837
835 800
829 733
809 787
846 842
790 865
800 801
812 883
794 818
773 796
759 817
755 854
801 791
757 851
806 837
808 819
806 837
831 788
809 825
Course Content (Comment on the
Examinations (Comment on course content, subject matter, & Comments regarding the Comments regarding the course
difficulty, fairness, number, etc.) relevance of this course.) Instructor structure
Start time-5:30 but class didn't
start to 6, did not stay true to time
for presentations
On the syllabus, the course
structure was what one might
The content of the class was expect in a graduate level course.
extremely relevant to my future Students were assigned chapters
success as a school administrator. to present and there were articles
Unfortunately, many students to read that the instructor had
came late to class and took long selected to enhance the
We were required to complete breaks in the middle because the discussions. Unfortunately, the
two comprehensive projects on instructor did not challenge our instructor interrupted student
TK20, but the instructor did not thinking. The instructor never presentations so often with long
seem interested in the pieces, and required us to critique an example speeches, that the schedule was
did not adjust the workload to of communication then to suggest Dr. Woodrow always had a delayed by three weeks at one
accommodate adequate improvements. Although we had professional demeanor and was point in the semester. It is very
completion of the TK20 conversations about past well spoken. It was surprising that frustrating to prepare a
assignments. He often mentioned experiences, we did not put the he was often late and insisted on presentation, then have it put off
in class how we were not to lag information into practice in the ending the class 25 minutes early for three weeks. It is difficult to
behind in our preparations, and university classroom. The content even if a student was in the middle remain sharp and fresh on the
yet he seemed oblivious to the was mostly presented at the of a presentation. The three hour topic, and disheartening to know
time required to manage the comprehension level of Blooms class only lasted two hours most that the instructor puts little value
workload. Taxonomy. sessions. on the student's work.
TK 20 assignments a little unclear
but class is good
I enjoyed the way Dr. woodrow
encouraged us to prepare for our
the Level of difficulty was The content was stimulating and first days as adminstrators, The course was designed well and
appropriate and fair. the instructor was an expert. wlaking us step by step. was challenging.
this was a required course so I
expected the content to be I would not suggest taking this
relevant to the degree plan. professor twice in one semester.
however, from time to time we Class lines became blurred and it
Some of the assignments needed would veer off topic and therefore was confusing to both the class
clarification and were very vague. pushing us off course. and the professor.
Great class! I was allowed to think
freely and creatively throughout
the entire semester.
The instructor had a professional
demeanor, yet started class 15
I understood the course content to minutes late or later on a regular
be about administering the special basis. He said he was giving the
programs of a school district, yet I class members time to eat dinner The two hour time frame for our
was uncertain of how some of the before he started at 5:45. The three hour class often put us
topics discussed in class related to result was that class members behind in our presentation
the course. It seemed as if the came in later and brought dinner schedule. Instead of allowing
content of EDAD 5610 was often with them. They did not eat students to conclude a
merged with EDAD 5620 because before class started. The class presentation by 8:10, which would
the same instructor taught both ended at 7:45 because someone have been the usual ending time
There will be one examination classes to the same cohort back to asked if we could end early in for the class, the instructor
based on the text for the class, and back on Monday and Tuesday order to get to the parking garage interrupted the presentations and
class discussions. nights. before the attendant left. ended early at 7:45.
The course was challenging, but in
The course was very relevant to Dr. Woodrow was a fair, candid, a good way. I am much more
the number of special programs and honest instructor who inspired knowledgeable than before I
The difficulty was appropriate. involved in schools. us to think outside the box. started.
This a great instructor.
The exams were very fair.
Although the subjects are very The course covers several topics
difficult, the exams came from from depriciation, to losses, and
homework and class problems we spans journal entries and
have done in class, so with enough calculation.s Mrs Prachyl did an Excellent instructor on top of her
practice there is no reason why excellent job clarifying material game and very knowledgebale in
anyone cant pass with our class. accnt NONE
Difficult subject, but she explains
the materials well
They are not always clear There is more than enuf She know her stuff Very difficult
The Proffessor was pretty strict
about homework submissions bu
the due date, it created a lot of
pressure because it was hard to
This course is more difficult then I balance with work and school at
expected. the same time
Dr Prachyl is a great instructor. I
really can appreciate the way she
was able to asses the performance
of her classs as a whole and make
the adjustments in her teaching
methods and the way she
presented the material so that The course is difficult but you will
everyone would get a better get a better understanding if you
Fair Very Relevant understanding. work thru the material.
The course content was frustrating
trying to understand. When I felt
that I knew what I was doing, but I The instructor works the problems
still did not get the grades I from the book each class and
expected. answers homework questions.
Would have liked to have reviewed
exams in class after they were
taken
the course was good in structure, I
just would rather take exams more
often over 1 or 2 chapters
maximum but not more than 2. it
felt like a lot of information to
cover and not sure what
specifically to study and focus
more for in each chapter.This
course is not easy and I believe it
would be helpful to student to
this course is hard and it is a lot of take test more often over less
tests are difficult, we have 5 exams content to learn but the instructor chapters it would allow them to
total and our best four grades are was organized in presenting the respectful organized and explains focus more on less information
counted content well and process it better.
I want to note that as students we
The instructor is quite knowlegable should be provided access to a
The examinations were quite about the subject matter. Her tutor or accounting lab for
difficult. I do not believe enought educational and career students that need further
time was alloted to configurate the I like the subject matter. The background supports her teaching assistance in understanding the
answers to the problems. homework was helpful. style. course material.
Test are hard. The homework gives
us a good practice but the test are
not similar like the homework The course content is fair and
which makes it a little complicate good. I like how we take notes in she is a good instructor just the
to pass the test with an A. I don't class and explain the material and test she makes them very difficult
think is fair that the test be be able to ask homework and hard to pass with an A even if i
different of how the homework is. questions. spend all my time studing.
course is extremely difficult but content is overwhelming but very
very fair. useful to my career dr prachyl is an excellent instructor
Very difficult material, unfair
testing material. Good Demanding and too severe good
We have four exams in this class, The instructor explains the
and a final. The exams are We go over various topics material to the class, but
challenging, but you have to study pertaining to the accounting field. sometimes we feel lost because
a lot to be able to get a good For every chapter in the book, we the material is hard to The course structure is okay with
grade. If you don't study, most have assigned homework, and we comprehend. But she does try her me. We have four tests and a final
likely you will fail the exams. They have tests. We also go over some best to teach us how to solve exam, and we also have
are very difficult. of the problems in the book. every problem. homework for every chapter.
It is difficult to prepare for
examinations due to the nature of
the work at hand and the amount
of detail. also due to the fact that a
study guide of sorts is not specific
to the actual problems on the
exam. But the number of exams
and chances that you provide
make for a way to pass the course.
The instructor was able to
communicate effectively as well as
also teach the course to where it
The exams are a bit difficult Overall this course is a bit difficult was explained clearly na
Great professor! Would absolutely
recommend her to any student
here!
This material is a bit complex and
She is very nice and fair, she knows needs time to understand, I would
a lot about this subject and I am like to take more time in discussing
very comfortable in asking the material and working out more
questions. problems.
There is a lot of material to be There is a lot of material to be There is a lot of material to be There is a lot of material to be
covered, the book is a total covered, the book is a total covered, the book is a total covered, the book is a total
wasteof money and time if it was wasteof money and time if it was wasteof money and time if it was wasteof money and time if it was
for the professor it would be for the professor it would be for the professor it would be for the professor it would be
nearly impossible to achive sucess nearly impossible to achive sucess nearly impossible to achive sucess nearly impossible to achive sucess
in this course in this course in this course in this course
not relevant to me being a finance structure too heavy for one
Very difficult material major BAD BAD BAD semester
Most problems on the exam didn't
reflect the material given to
prepare for it. The very first test
had almost 50 Accounting
questions and it was only a 1 and a She is new, so I think she may
half hour course. 90% of the need more practice to feel
people were still seated when it comfortable and develope a better
was time to give up the exam. The lesson plan. She seemed to read
first one was way too long, but she the PowerPoints most of the time
managed to shorten them for the and spent little time on material
rest of the semester. she developed. The structure is good
Good overall subject- thought the Very fair and consistent- is always
Difficult but for this subject very book could be better- subject is my available and supports the Loved the accounting course-
relevant and fair major and enjoyed this class students challenging but learned much
The structure at the beginnig of
She needs to be louder, not the semeseter was crucial. It made
mumble things, stop assuming no room for mistakes. But it was
that we know everything, stop nice of her to change it to 5 exams
rushing through the material, and instead of just having 2. Just some
The homework assignments and be more interested in the material free advise here - accounting
the problems worked in class did that she teaches. If she's not classes should not consist of just a
not reflect the exam questions at interested in what she is teaching, midterm and final. That is too
all. what makes her think that we are? difficult for full-time students!
Great instructor, very
approachable and available to help
if you ask.
The class itself is challenging, but
this instructor definitely made it
even harder. Students expect
professors to come to class
prepared to teach the subject, and
not see them complain about how
The homework problems assigned tired they are, and talk about
in Homework Manager were random stuff with other students.
related to the chapters, however, This professor would just read off
she assigned them before she of the powerpoint slides which
taught them in class. Most of the made the class monotonous and
in class tests were not related to boring. Her way of explaining
the homework assignments and different topics was hard to
what was covered in class. understand.
The guest speakers were great. I
would have liked to have had more
speakers, and a different variety of
assignments other than just
summaries over articles.
writting all semester was not fun this course should be offered
at all earlier on the curriculum excellent instuctor a lot of common sense reminders
this course was of no use to me,
and should not be a required
course
I'm really unsure of what this
course is really about because part
Personally, I like her laid back of it seems to be professional
personality and she is easy to talk development in general and the
I have never had a course like this. to and take advice from. I think other part seems to be just
If anything, this class lacks she is fine in giving experience and accounting in particular. I think
There have been no exams in this significantly in content because I knowledge for this class. the person teaching this course
course except for the final which I along with most of my classmates However, she is very unorganized, should focus more on one than the
have not taken so I cannot believe this class is a waste of time has never given us our grades for other rather than teach things that
comment on that. I am not even being run the way it has been. I the class, and seems a bit flustered are from the business
sure this course is really necessary think this course should be tailored or tired by the end of the day. I communications class. The
for this degree if I have already closer to accounting students and wish she had more energy to teach assignments are fairly weighted I
had a business communications not just anybody looking for any us but she does crack some pretty suppose, but some of them seem
class. type of job. good jokes for accounting. pointless.
Wish she would be more
There was only 1 exam over the enthusiactic over the subject and
entire book. Not too difficult, maybe then it wouldn't feel like Next time, make the mock
mostly vocabulary. I did not like the article summaries. this class was a waste of time. interview a requirement.
Exams were difficult at times due Need to go over more problems so
to material not being discussed in that the students can have a better
the lecture or gone over in the understanding of the material that
class. is being taugt.
The instructor was a very
knowlegdeable person and made
clear explanations. However, the
instructor made the examinations
very long taking in consideration
the information covered. Also,
Examinations were loaded with examinations were somewhat
information to be complete in a vague and wordy making difficult
small time window. I enjoyed the challenge to understand.
The instructor mainly reads the
power points and doesn't explain
This class is very difficult. the subject well.
Exams didn't reflect what was
cover in the homework.
Exams were difficult and seemed
to include some problems that we Good instructor, good
had not discussed fully, but we understanding of material and
probably should have known. I enjoyed the course. subject.
exams are fair!
I know she is a great instructor,
but this course is not her specialty.
In the work problems, She had
trouble trying to explain to the
class where the numbers came
from. She had the answers to
every problem that we went over,
but without that, she would of
been loss.
The homework software is a
Fair beating. She is great.
Homework submmited through
Most of the time she is available to MyAccountingLab helped me
help us. prepare for tests
I feel like the calculations required
on the exams have been fair, but I
feel that some of the termonology
questions have not been clearly
stated.
Exams are fair and not very
difficult. They cover the material
covered in class and in the
corresponding chapters. The I enjoy how the instructor doesn't
instructor also accepts feedback The instructor explains objectives just teach directly from the text. I
on ensuring the exams are fair and with a real world perspective and can read the chapters on my own
able to be completed in the The course content was very is always open to discussion time and appreciate the instructor
allotted time. relevant to the course. regarding the objectives. using class time for discussion.
The number of examinations is
fair. The material is not too
difficult, but it would be more I think the content of this course is
helpful if the instructor explained very interesting. I think this can be I like this instructor, but there are
more the content of exams. I very useful for learning a little bit some things where I believe that
found that some of the material on more about management she could explain a little bit more
the exam was not fully covered accounting. I like this course a lot, harder material. Maybe she could
during class, and it was a little bit so that maybe a reason for why I take more time to explain at a I like the way this class is
difficult to learn on our own. enjoy the class as a whole. more detailed level. structured.
The instructor is very
knowledgable, but when it comes
Examinations were very difficult to down to testing/examinations,
understand. They were very vague she/he makes the test very very Overall, course structure was
and wordy. The content was very interesting. confusing and hard to understand. good.
The instructor only reads the
power points. The instructor does
not explain the information in
deatil.
The exams cover material that was Dr. Prachyl really knows what she
covered in class and the is talking about. She is willing to
information flows together. I like help students with any questions
how we have 4 exams and a final Although difficult, the course they may have and give further
giving students the opportunity to content is appropriate and the explanations and examples when
concentrate on specific materials work load is demanding but not needed. I think she truely loves her
at once. unreasonable. job and teaching us!!
The instructor does not give you a The instructor should do a better
review of what's going to be on job at explaining the course and
the exams. The exams were really also at telling students the
difficult since we did not know the material that will be cover in the
material that was going to be on it. The course covers a lot of material. exams.
very difficult good instructor
Her exams were very difficult and
challenging. No matter how hard I
studied, she made the questions
very tricky. It could be either of the We were avaluated in four
aswers but the difference was a different exams, quizzes, and an I think she is very hard, no matter
single word. audit case. what class she is teaching.
The number of exams and the
difficulty was reasonable.
However, I think there should have The exams were closely related to
been more time allowed for the the important matters in auditing.
exams because there was barely This course is very important but I
enough time to finish them. just found it very difficult to follow.
The exams were very difficult.
Questions were very detailed and I
believe they shouldn't be seeing as Auditing is not very interesting to
the instructur only read begin with, but this instructor only The case study, plus tests, plus
powerpoints to 'teach' the straight read through power points quizzes was a bit too much. Took
material. making it even worse. up most of my time with this class.
Amazing teaching layout. Very
Exams were fair considering open and understanding of
course content. Great subject to learn. students. Great!
Good Good good GoodGood
Wish we didnt have to do an
This teacher is fair. journal every class this teacher was very interactive
Clear preparation and appropriate Clear and organized lectures, lots I like to describe her as firm but
information that facilitates student of hands-on experience, and many fair, which is exactly the type of Excellent structure. Learned so
success. No tricks. fun activities. instructor I appreciate. much.
The sturcture of the class was a bit
disorganized at times not because
of the insturctor it was the
students feeling free to do as they
please.... take upo her time, come
in late, cell phones going off. She
did say at the first of the year to be
It is fun being in her classes. She is on time , do not sleep in her class,
I enjoyed the way she had her I really enjoy the books. They are fun and it makes one want to and careful not to text or carry on
exams because the way it was ones I want to keep in my library. come to class. She has a fresh way conversations on the phone. I do
given was an example of our There is so much area to cover it of teaching and is not a so called not know what type of acttion she
abilities. I think this is one of the would take more than one stuffy insturctor. She brings in really has to control these students
best apporoaches one can semester to grasp the entire stories of her past which is a good but UNT needs to devise some way
evaluate. YEA content. Will take more courses thing. so the instructors can take action.
I thought Professor Rhonda did a
nice job. Unlike most professors at
the University, she has a job The in class negotiations were very
The required books for the couse outside of the university. she helpful. It was a very relaxed
gave me a pretty good shared job related stories that environment which allowed
The exams were practical which understanding along with the in were applicable to our negotiation students to open up and express
was good for me. class negotiation. class. The class was never boring. themselves.
The instructor, while very nice,
was a little disorganized. It
seemed she changed the syllabus
several times. This may be
because she was not accustomed
The subject matter was interesting to teaching for two to three hours
and I learned alot about myself once a week, but at times it was
Clear and fair. while taking the class. frustrating. Fine
I felt that the structure of the
course was a little weak. There
were times when I felt that the
instructor surrendered control of
Mrs. Wilkinson-Jaynes is an class to the students. Assignments
extremely engaging and pleasant were sometimes ambiguous, as
person. She actively encourages the syllabus was not followed very
The course is very relevant. The participation and was very closely. I enjoyed the very
course content and subject matter effective at leading the class to interactive class environment, but
Examinations have been fair and would, I believe, benefit any explore new ways of relating to, I feel that we would all have
well thought out. student. and negotiating with, others. benefitted from more structure.
The instructor is very patient with
students. She will do what ever Free, but all of course like this one
n/a I love this course helps them succeed. have to be free.
I think the exams and book I think Dave Renfro was a good
analysis for this class was pretty I think the teacher could have teacher and knew what he was
fair and would give he idea of this done a better job staying on topic talking about and knew the I think the structure was organized
a nine out of ten. but was good. information well. some days.
I have had other instructors who
claim to havea Socratic teaching
method. They ask a question and
then proceed to tell youthe right
answer if you don't come by i
naturally. Renfro absolutely falls
into the category of a Socratic
Method teacher. If a concept is
gleaned by the student
immediately, he doesn;t sit
there,tell them thatthey are wrong
and then explain the correct
answer. He does make sure the
student is able to grasp concepts
and come to conclusions. For
This is definitely the most some this may take the whole The course structure fits the
stimulating class I have taken in semester or maybe even several instructor and the material
my entire education. semesters. perfectly.
the course were great.I got an
opportunity to examine myself.
Fair, Professor Renfro makes it
known from the first day of class This is the third class I have taken Professor Renfro makes his classes
what is to be expected on his Course materials were relavant to with Professor Renfro, as always an open forum, which is excellent
exams. the course he did an outstanding job. for the courses that he teach.
The class often got off topic and he
had a hard time getting everyone
back on track and I didn't really get
any help with the questions I had
about the paper. I talked to him
twice and emailed him about
The midterm was not that difficult twice. He said he would get back
for me, but I think some of the the course content was specific to to me and never did. I would have
questions were too specific like a the class and I found the book very rathered this class been online We did not go by the course
specific sentence out of the book good. To me the book was an easy instead of wasting my time syllabus we got little behind. I like
in a partiicular chapter he was read and had great examples on actually going to class. I did like the things very structured so it kind of
looking for not a concept. the subject matter. book and the course subject. bothered me.
The exams were not that difficult, The instructor was fair, a little hard
and we only had two.We were told to understand sometimes due to
well in advance when they were, his accent, but he was a good
and had all the review material. instructor.
Examinations were fair. Although
questions pertaining to videos
watched in class seemed a bit
much. There is no certain way to
know what questions would come
from vidoes and therefore nearly Would like to see up to date
impossible to take appropriate materials used regarding the Instructor was very personable The course structure was
notes. elderly. and easy to talk with. organized and timely.
He tried extremely hard to insure I believe the structure to be based
This was a gerentology course and that all students understood what on the structure of the text book.
There will only be 2 test, and I all the materials were very he was saying and understands the So, I am unsure of how to improve
believe them to be fair. accurate. information the lessons.
The content is relavant. However,
the subject matter sometimes is a
little distratcting. Classmates go off
on tangents and spend too much
talking about things that do not
really pertain to the subject. I HE is very knowledgebable but he
would rather have guest speakers keeps apologizing for his accent. I
and real world experiences so that can understand him just fine, I
I will learn more. I even gave the think he needs more confidence.
instructor information for a guest He has alot of knowledge to give
speaker but no one was ever regarding global stuff. However, I
THe exams are fair, however, invited. We were even told we need more information pertaining
there is no review and the material would have a field trip to a nursing to elderly in the metroplex, the
is quite lengthy. I find it difficult facility, but that didn't transpire ones that I will be working with. I
knowing exactly what to study. either. really miss Dr. Maudia Gentry.
I think the instructor is very
passionate about the elderly and
The class was easy to follow and he has much knowlegde to gain I like the book and the structure of
understand. Everything was clear. from. the course.
He struggled a bit in the begining
to keep the students on topic but
The exams are difficult but the then regained control mid-
questions may need re-wording. It was very interesting semester.
good need to follow him better
with visual power point and not hard to understand due to his
difficulty with out review sheet only class disscussion accent good
no review given even though
students asked. some questions filled alot of learning time with
were very difficult and did not I did not learn very much in this films, very few handouts, boring
relate. course. which disappointed me. with lecture it was good
I am not good at all in taking test. I
do not think that text show the
over all picture. Some people have
fears and this is one of mine.
When I start to take a test my
mind goes in slow motion (it has When there is only one insturctor
always been that away) teachers in a class that is teaching an
as well as insturctors know my fear enormous amount of students it
so at time there has been makes it hard on the teacher. We
modifications. Some are scared of as students forget he has a life out
spiders or elevators mine is test of the school room. He or she is a
because it does not show the over I can truly say it has been a great mother or father. To keep
all picture of what I know. I have pleasure to be in Dr. Amin's class. structure in the class room the
learned a great deal much more He is a very compasionate man insturctor needs to keep the
than I imagined. I am part of the There is so much left in this book who cares about his sutdents. He students from taking away from
old so I felt I could relate to the unfinished but it has me wanting is available to speak with him and the subject matter. There is not
problem of ageing but I found that to know more. I feel that the will devote his time to each enough time for the insturctor to
I had no clue as what I am facing course book is wonderful and well student. This is what I look for in do his/her work if there is so many
and what I have yet still to face. written. It was a good choice an isturctor. distructions made by his students.
The instructor has no applied
knowledge of this subject. I am
thankful that I got my other aging
classes out of the way and this was
my last one. I still recall much of
what I learned in my other courses
because they taught us not only
the material but how to apply it.
Which ever Administrator chose to
fire our other instructors and hire
new ones has done a disservice to
The questions were very obscure future students. Especially those
and unless you were able to I honestly can say that I do not studying gerontology. I am so glad
memorize every chapter line by recall anything from this course I am done and dont have to pay This class could have been 100%
line then you were not going to do other than what I am studying for any more classes that I get online. There was no value to
well. right now. absolutely nothing out of them. being in class.
A study guide would have been
appreciated, because there were Went the extra mile to insure
multiple chapters with masses of students understood what he was
information. Very relevant saying. It was in line with the text book.
I really miss Dr. Gentry. I believe it
was a mistake to hire someone
just because they do research and
The exams are not fair in this class. are published. I will take a social
We cover alot of information and worker any day that works with all
we do not get any kind of review. The course content is so so and the Miss Lucys in Dallas. The
When talking to the professor the subject matter is okay. Nothing professor that has alot of real
before an exam, he says not to really stood out in the class. I world contacts and know how to
worry however, i end up with a would have loved to have had interact with everyone. This
bad grade despite studying alot. more application assignments professor is good on paper but
My classmates had the same where we learned from first hand doesn't quite cut it in the class
experience too. experiences. I miss Dr. Gentry. room.
They are difficult with no review Great instructor, very respectful
but he teaches great!! Great and knowledgeable. Wish class was a little bit later.
needs more class control it got
better mid semseter. I think its
because we are older students
difficult ,,wording on exams good & relevant Clear & don;t mind the accent with more expeirences to share
need to consider a review study
guide
The exams were ok. I would hve
liked to have a review or study
guide. Many of my other classes
offer this help.
The instructor has an amazing
working knowledge of the material
and is talented at teaching. He
cares about his students and
The exams are moderately continually asks for their feedback.
difficult, due to the lack of I wish that he would structure his
understanding of what of all the course lectures more and keep
material (covered and not them consistent. Also he seems
covered) an individual is expected disorganized and needs an
to know. Each chapter in the text assistant. The students often
is very dense, and although the seem to not understand what his
material is incredibly insightful and The course content is spectacular. expectations are and are lost and
interesting, it is quite difficult to The text is one of the finest frustrated. At times it was difficult
know what to study and what not accumulations of information that to get a hold of him via office
to study. The number of questions I have ever experienced and up to hours and email. Blackboard is
and the variety of types of date and well thought out. The such a great resource and it was In order to effectively teach the
questions (essay, multiple choice course content was congruent not utilized to its potential. He material and for students to
and fill in the blank) make the with the class. The videos and never sent an announcement understand it and to excel at
structure of the test very well lectures tied in very well to the about uploaded documents and testing, there must be consistency
balanced. i think that the lectures course. Unfortunately, not all of his grades from earlier in in the class structure and material.
should have prepared us better inconsistency was a theme in the the semester are available. He This is college, yes, but we are
and should have been more course as well as too much would tell the class that he would paying a significant amount of
directly reflected in the exams. discussion time that led us to talk do something like upload a money to be taught and to learn
The very first exam was the best more and cover less of the document from class or give us a the material for which will be used
one because it followed more material in class. Discussions study guide for the last exam and in our careers in the field of
closely the lectures. could have been cut short. he never did. gerontology.
I felt as though the questions on
the exam were at times random
and the way some questions Great Professor takes constructive
weren?t specific as to what he was criticism well and is always willing
asking. to make improvements.
Dr. Amin is a great teacher who
expresses his enthusiasm for the
Exams seemed fair and relevent to topic while teaching. I would take
me. The course was very interesting. another course with Dr. Amin. The course structure was fine.
too many films, not enough
handouts, would lecture well but
the first of the semester no on the tests somehow my scores
reviews for the test but later on were lower even after studying I feel I did not learn as much as I
did give review questions. ppts.,reading material. had expected. Structure was good.
The exams themselves were not
difficult, but the wording made it
difficult to successful understand
what answer he was looking for.
Resulting in answering the Course content was good for the
question incorrectly. class. Very insightful!
He is trying very hard but we need
more instruction to past the
course and I want to find out what
I don't understand the exam and my grade is so I would no if need
we don't have reviews find to drop the class
Examinations were fair;except for
some of the material that was
taken from videos watched in
class. Sometimes the details of the All things related to the elderly are
videos were not covered and relevant these days! I would love Dr. Amin has a great sense of
nearly impossible to know that the to see more courses related to the humor and a clear understanding
information would be on a test. elderly on the schedule. of the course. Structure was fine.
My instructor didn't respond in a
timely manner to emails. Grades
not posted in a timely manner.
Instructor not available to speak
with during conference hour
stated. Overall the instructor had a
passion about his content area,
Grades not posted in a timely but I had difficulty understanding
manner. at times.
The only thing I would like to
comment on is the timeliness of
posting of grades. I have only
received 1 grade out of the whole
semester and the grades have still
Great information on minority not been posted to blackboard like I like how he created a variety of
aging. Learned alot about other he said. Would like to know where different projects. It was fun and
The wording was not always clear. ethnicities. I stand going into the final. interesting.
need to give a review guide
The tests were ok. A review or
study guide would have been
helpful.
Not clear about what needs to be
studied for the exams. Great instructor...
excellent great great teacher
Very knowledgeable, a wealth of
Difficult, but fair. Explained in understanding on all aspects of
detail. New concepts of Very interesting, held class art. Detailed, creative, and Great over all. A lot of information
memorization. attention, great class participation. challenging. for a short period of time.
too much to remember and too interesting but too much to
hard remember at one time very nice good
I believe the first exam should
have come earlier in the term
rather than covering 12 chapters The instructor is very informative
at once. It was hard to get all that and passionate about the subject
information in at once to an exam. matter.
I would have like that the
instructor would had teach the
course because I would have
learned a lot. I learned by reading
the book. He just read the power
point slides and he was very rude
to people who went to the
The course was very easy. A lot of bathroom or somewhere else. He
work is necessary, but it works The course content is very did no respect the students, he The course structure was a little bit
fine. interesting. Everything is relevant. was very rude and unprofessional. confusing at the beginning.
I like Dr. Larson I do however
would have liked to see him come
prepared for the classes. I would
have enjoyed to learn fromhis
Exams are fair the questions are experiences instead of reviewing The course structure followed the
computer generated. powerpoint slides. syllabus.
The are not centered well because
the can be any sentence in the If the instructor takes time out
book. That makes it hard to study before class to make sure what he I believe he needs to rethink how
for exams. needs to teach it will be better. to teach his class.
He reads off powerpoints, and
Easy tests doesnt really teach that well
Do not like him. the first day of
class I approached him, and asked
him a question, he answered, I
asked another question and he
interrupted me and said did you
hear what he said? (there was a
video playing on his computer)
unbelievable..." and ignored me
after that completely. There was a
lady standing by and she answered
my question instead. another day
he had mis-graded one of my
assignments and I waited after
class to bring it up to him.He said
just email me about it, why would
I email him if I am right there in
person to solve the issue? He was
very rude to some classmates too,
when people needed to step
Exams are fair, plenty of time and I like the course content is very outside the room he asked them
convenient because they are interesting and fairly easy to out loud why and where were they
online. quizzes on the other hand understand, moreover is very going, even suggested "are you the course is easy to follow and
are timed and the time allowed to useful. will be very important to going to the bathroom?" in front the book supports his lectures 100
finish them is way too short. know in real life jobs. of all the class." percent so is very reliable.
It is my opinion that the instructor
is not interested in teaching either
this course or at this school. It may The lectures by the instructior
be a good idea for him to teach were more like a powerpoint
This course is critical for my another course or move to a non- presentation done by someone at
particular major teaching position that he talked a company where they simply tell
(Entrepreneurship) and I am glad it about applying for during one of you what's already written on the
is required. his lectures. powerpoint.
Access assignments were unclear
and Dr. Larson had a difficult time
explaining how to do them since
he was unfamiliar with it himself
I think it would be more effective if
an instructor was chosen that
would do more than offer
editorials, but actually explain the
content and give exams of how to
use more computer programs.
I think this course should have
used an Access book from 2010
instead of 2007 as well as a book
The exams were fair but the that the other does not have his
quizzes were not. I think the political views and correct facts I think that the course should have
number is a good amount for the about the items that he is actually Good person once you get to know been taught in a computer lab
the time limit. talking about. him. instead of a lecture hall.
too simple, needs to be more
informative and challenging
He is a instructor that he doesn't
show that enthusiasm to teach
which makes the class boring. I
think this course should be taught
with enthusiasm because it is a
course that we as students need to
His course content was just quizzes understand clearly because
His test are good very similar to and tests and access assignment everything in business world is
the quizzes but at times hard to which he didn't really explain now computer. He find it difficult
understand the questions. much how to do. to explain the course.
This professor is awful. I have
already been in contact with the
dean about him so I know my
concerns are already known.
Overall, the instructor is very
enthusiastic about subject matter,
However The instructor lacks time
management especially during
lecture time. It would be more
beneficial to the students if you
strictly followed the power point
presentations so that the students
can have extra material to study
for examinations and they are
allowed to take notes. The teacher
The exams consist of too many seemed a little scattered with
essay questions and not enough thoughts during lectures which
time. There should be less essay kept it hard to follow what she was
questions and more multiple talking about. It really was unfair
choices for the non-science major to the students that the instructor
classes. There should be max of did not make enough time and
four chapters to study for test. required us to know the rest.
The instructor has done a fine job
The difficulty of this course is what in teaching the material to the
is expected of a college level The content of this course is students in a way that the
biology course. perfect. students can understand it. The course structure is perfect.
Dr. Tanner is a well qualified
instructor respecting every
The content of this course dealt students needs and he maintains a
The diffuculty of this course is with important topics needed to social friendly environment
what is expected of a college level understand the basic principles of allowing students to feel
biology course. biology. comfortable being themselves. The course structure is perfect.
This instructor is a good instructor.
The final exam was too hard and I feel like if I would have had him
counted for too much of our for lecture I would have passed
grade. All this was fine. lecture. Course structure was fine.
The exams were difficult, but fair.
Dr. Muniz challenges her students The course content is relevant. I have had Dr. Muniz for several
to master the subject matter. She However, many of the concepts classes over the past few years. I don't believe I would change the
is engaging and makes the introduced were new to me. My She is a dedicated professor, who course structure, but would
material interesting. She makes previous course work did not is invested in bettering her recommend the prerequisites be
herself available to assist students prepare me for this class, as it students. I believe I am better for evaluated to ensure they are
as needed. I'm very grateful to should have. Dr. Muniz did an having had her as an instructor. preparing students for the
have had her for this class. exceptional job in closing the gap. Thank you. Business Policy class.
The higher level content, more
difficult subject matter, and Very respectful and fair..listens to Fast paced in my opinion..very
important relevance of the everyone's opinion and takes into demanding and time pressing..will
The exams are fitting for a material were all expected from consideration everyone's test your ability to manage study
capstone course. this capstone course. viewpoints. and social time.
Fair difficulty, time-consuming
material. Good relevance. Book not good. Good prof. Good structure
Dr. Muniz is a great instructor. She
is tough, but fair and expects us to
The first examination was very work hard to earn our grade. I felt
difficult considering that this class The course content with the case that she listened to the students
is not a lecture course. The second studies was very applicable to this concerns and addressed our
and third exams were still a bit course. In this course I used all of concerns about the course. She The course structure is intense and
difficult but manageable with the the information that I have learned made herself accessible to it is alot of work and material to
aid of study guides which were during my studies to complete students through email and office learn as can be expected in a
very helpful. assignments. appts. capstone class.
The instructor is very
knowledgeable about the subject
and encourages students ask
questions or provide feedback or
different perspectives on things
covered in class. She is always Course structure of being placed in
Exams are fair and have different available outside of class if a teams is great for this course
levels of difficulty and covers Course content is very helpful and student needs additional help or is because of the diffferent projects
material covered in class. is relevant to the course. having a problem in the class. that are assigned in class.
Understanding and really connects
with the students, and knows how Well structured, the first
pretty difficult but fair, if you really Learned a lot in this course that to explain the material in the presentations really prepared us
study you will do good on the will definately help, once I start my textbook and related issues in the for our final case study and
exam. career. world. presentation.
The professor was always available
for outside help and took as much
of his own time to help as the
students needed! He genuinely
cared about his students'
education. Very refreshing!
very fair. Like the review before
each test interesting Dr. Choe is a great instructor simple
fair relevant
The Exams always have questions
on them that I never remember us
covering over the test which The instructor seemed to just be
causes me to miss the majority of The course material that we went talking and she didnt really grab
those. over was average my attention while she lectured.
The course content, subject matter The instructor utilize's her time in
and relevance of this course is class and starts on time and
The examinations are really fair. directly from the course book. teaches the subject very thorougly. fair enough.
Great Great Great Great
The structure was difficult, I dont
usually do well when there are few
assignment in the course. We only
I enjoyed the way the instructor had three tests this semester and
presented the material and how that puts a lot of pressure and
This course was not so much The content of the course was she challenged us over the course percentage on each one. But over
difficult as it was interesting. enjoyable and easy to learn. of the semester. all it worked out well
Mix of questions. I did well I enjoyed learning about this
because I studied hard for the test. subject. New to me. Great person good attitude. Good!
course content was always the class is 100% lecture and tests.
addressed in class. we have gotten i would like to see homework
through almost the entire book. great instructor. her law assignments and class activities
although some things could have background definately helps her placed into the cirriculum. sitting
exams were fair and the format been covered more in depth, thoroughly teach the class. she is and hearin a hour and 20 minute
was understandable. the test overall what needed to be covered very knowledgable on the subject lecture every class perion can be
reviews helped as well. was covered. matter of the course. really boring at times.
She always review the exam a
class before the exam. N/A N/A N/A
Excellent Exams, does a thorough
test review and nearly 75% of
what she reviews is on test. Not
too difficult if you study She made criminal justice Very kind, and very knowledgeable Excellent course structure, she's
thoroughly for exams. interesting and involving. as a former prosector. interesting and I felt I learned a lot.
The instructor was great. I enjoyed
how she explains the subject and
relates it to real life situation and
applications.
I would recommend assigning a
different book as the current one
is really expensive. Also I didn't
much care for the book's
powerpoints as some of the ideas
No comment. were scattered. Professor Choe is a fair instructor. No comment.
Examinations were fairly given.
Yes, they were difficult for myself
but this is because there is a lot of
information that is being covered The course content and Really fantastic teacher. Takes her I wish that there were better ways
and I have very substantial test discussions were completely time out to help students to prepare for test examinations as
anxiety. relevant to the course itself. understand the topic of discussion. groups during the class.
A little tough but with studying
very fair.
The book choice for this class was The test reviews were great and I
great, easy to read and The instructor appeared to be well- did not feel pressured to complete
The class was quite interesting and understand. The key terms and informed, knowledgeable and the test hurriedly. Once other
informative. The powerpoints and definitions in the margins made approachable. She was available students completed the test, they
review were a great help. I really studying less cumberson. The for assistance. I enjoyed the class were allowed to leave and were
liked not having to study for more summary, key terms and review well enough to take other classes not disruptive to us who took
than four chapters for a test. questions were outstanding. taught by this instructor. longer.
Very knowledgeable. Also, a great
Covered criminal justice with a deal of personal work history that
broad stroke and touched on all makes the course very interesting Structure covered a lot of content
Fair and cover important topics of aspects of the system very well as as well as helps explain difficult or and flowed well from chapter to
course an intro course confusing concepts. chapter
informative and knowledgeable.
I really enjoy Dr. Choe; however,
the course can get a little boring. I
would suggest incorporating other
activities into the course such as
watching documentaries, movies,
court proceedings, or some other
visual aid. Also, instead of doing 4
court assignments, maybe do 2
The exams are very fair. Dr. Choe court assignments and give a
provides a review sheet which is Dr. Choe is my favorite CJ power point presentation on
extremely helpful All are appropriate instructor at UNT-Dallas. them.
Very well rounded individual. I love
the way she teaches. She makes
sure you understand the
The exams cover all the information given. She also likes to
information that we have make sure she is reaching
discussed in previous chapters and I was interested in the course everyone on every level without
she prepares us for them well. content. belittling them.
The subject matter was very
boring and repetitive but Dr. Choe
did make it fun, interesting, and a
great learning experience all at the
same time. The assignments in this
course were a great learning
experience and a great way to
start networking. I heard alot of
students complaining about having
to go to the court house. It can be
a hassle but it is well worth it.
These assignments were the most
hands on assingments I've had as
well as a great teaching tool. The
I really like the fact that we only only thing I didn't like in the course
have two exams in this course! The is having all 4 of the assignments Dr. Choe is an excellent
exam in this course was due at the same time. That makes intstructor! She is very helpful and
challenging. You had to study to me really nervous because I wasn't always willing and available to
do well but Dr. Choe gave an able to get any idea as to what she meet with us to discuss anything.
excellent exam review. was looking for. She is an inspiration to me! This course was well structured.
Instructor is one of the best at
UNT. Is very knowledgeable with
subjects and other material. A
combination of her experience and
genuine interest in teaching,
Exams medium on difficulty but Course content and subject matter makes Choe one of the favorites
fair acceptable number. very relevant to course. among students. Course structured very well.
I loved the lectures and
powerpoints. They were very She definitely understands the
helpful in learning and fully subject completely having been a
fair but challenging understanding the material former Assistant District Attorney.
I enjoyed this instructor, and I
would definitely refer her classes
to another student. Very
professional!
I enjoyed this teacher. She taught
in a very 'no nonsense' style, while
I think there should be more tests allowing the students
so that there isn't so much there was lots of related materials opportunities to explore and I think that it was a great
information condensed into each and supplemental information that exchange ideas with her and class...maybe could be a hybrid,
test. was very useful. eachother. meeting every other week.
THE EXAMS ARE AVERAGE IN THE COURSE CONTENT IS THE INSTRUCOTR IS VERY WELL THE CLASS STRUCTURE IS
NATURE RELEVANT IN NATURE SUITED TO TEACH THE COURSE EFFICIENT
I think due to the limited number
of exams in this course, it was very
difficult to remember all the Professor Choe was wonderful!!!
necessary information due to the She is a very interesting and
large number of chapters each pleasant instructor and I would
exam covered. Also, a review I absolutely loved this course. It highly recommend her courses to
sheet would have been helpful to was very interesting and exciting, other students. I wish she could be The course structure was clear and
assist in preparing for the exams. especially the court assignments! my professor for all my courses. easy to follow and understand.
Hard Easy to read! NA NA
Very relevant for the criminal
justice system that we surround Mrs. Choe is super fun. I like her
everyday.Mrs. Choe covered alot the most out of my instructors this
of helpful material that I can take semester. She is always on point,
I like the tests but I recommend with me everywhere I go. I also on time and well prepared for the
that Mrs. Choe gives test more learned that I can file a lawsuit class. She is open for questions at Having to complete the court
often covering less material. That against myself". I thought that was anytime. I would love to have her assignments really encouraged me
way theres not so much material a bit extremem that people for all of my classes, however; I not to want to commit crimes.
in each exam. Although; we're in actually do this. Overall I loved the didnt get her as one of my Seeing actual court cases really
college, I still believe that its too class. Thanks for all of your hard instructors for Spring 2011. Maybe gave me a more relevant respect
much material to remember all at work, time and effort you put in the following semester! Thanks for the law. I really enjoyed the
once. your job. " Mrs. Choe. court cases.
Dr. Choe's exams were challenging The content was not exactly my Dr. Choe is very nice and genuinely
but I studied what she went over subject because I am not going cares about her students. I can tell
in class and did fine. I wish she into law but, Dr. Choe made it that she wants us to pass her class The course structure went very
would have had three exams interesting. She went over the and makes herself available to well with the book. We did cover
instead of two because there was material very thouroughly until help us. I would definitely all of the material in the book
a lot of material on the last exam. everyone understood it. recommend her to someone else. which was a plus.
The class was interesting and I
Although I had studied, I did not learned quite a bit. However, I
earn the grades I expected on the prefer a book similar to the
tests. The final exam had more Introduction to Criminal Justice"
than 6 chapters and I feel that is book which included a summary,
too many chapters for one test. key terms and study questions. I like the idea of having a class one
Four chapters should be the This book had chapter summaries The instructor was knowledgeable, day a week but the class length
maximum. The powerpoints and but did not really appear to personable and available which can be draining. But don't change
review are wonderful. address the chapter content. " made the class interesting. it.
Covered the material in the class
and in the book. Was also very
consitent in what was asked which Very interesting. Outside project a I really liked her. Knew what she
made it easier to study for as little hard, but related to what was was talking about and was always
opposed to going in blind taught. available if needed. Very organized and informative
This should have been a online
course because we never seen the
instructor.
This instructor canceled class
almost the entire semester. I saw
her a total of 5 times throughout
the semester. She was never
there. Even when we had an exam,
she would get another professor
to fill in for her. I don't mind
canceled classes, but I paid a lot of
money for the professor to just not
come to class. Many students
complained about her never being
there. She gave a mid-term and
never went over anything that was
on the exam. I don't understand
how that happens? I'm glad she
will not be returning. I was
interested in this course, but took
nothing from it. Non-existent
fari but did not cover a lot of We had subs more than instructor very good loved the class and
testing material in class very good was there online combo
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fair Fair Very Knowledgeable and Fair Fail
When I signed up for the class I did
not see that it was a hybrid on-line
class. This needs to be better
indicated.
fair relevent to the course Excellent instructor
During the first class this professor
explained the type of exams that
would be given. During the
second class, she explained that
another type of exam would be
given. The week prior to our first
exam, she reverted back to the
type of exam discussed during the
first class, and that was done
implicitly over blackboard."
Further, the date of the exam was
not clear. Although I understand
that the professor has a right to The professor seemed very
deviate from the syllabus, this disconnected during the entire The structure of the course was
professor took it to an entirely The content of the course was semester. It took forever to get confusing because of the
different level." appropriate. grades on assignments. professor.
Instructor debated about text
content between multiple choice
and essay questions. At the end
essay question were provided to
review. At the time of the exam the instructor has knowledge
one could choose any of the two Discussion tend to start with about the subject been teaches
questions. There is only two exams chapter content but then are but need to refer more to the
given during semester. mislead by students and teaches. book.
would have preferred multiple
choice over essay, with exam
reviews.
Very knowledgeable about her
GREAT! Very fair Instructor! subject being taught! Very compassionate! Great!
Her exams are fair. The content is relevant.
The instructor is a very educated
the course is very challenging but and challenging person. This is
rewarding. It is fair in the sense I like the course content because it good because I like to be
that we are allowed the sufficient pertains to real situations and challenged in my courses so that I
time to be prepared for the social problems happening today learn the material with a deeper The structure of the course is fine
evaluations. in the criminal justice system. understanding. to me.
scale of 1 (low) 10 (high) difficulty content - 8 subject matter - 10 Knowledgeable in the field of cjus,
7 fairness 10 number 5 relevance -10 arrogant, fair scale - 5
What I observed was an instructor
that was very moody,abrupt, and
self centered. It has also come to
my attention from several other
class mates that she has made
racial comments pertaining to
black people. The students told me
she said several times Why does
she have such a hard time with
black students"? Another time she
asked a student "Why do black
people give her such a hard time"?
I find this lack of interpersonal
skills strange, becuase Dr. Worley
has six degrees and she teaches an
ethics class. I am almost interested
in relaying this inormation to FOX4
new,by email. It took alot of
courage for me to attend an
university, therefore I should be
able to enjoy my experience as a
student here at UNT and not have
to endure any type prejudices
from my instructor. I think Senator
Royce West would be disappinted
to know that the staff members at
UNT are prejudice against black
students. I can't learn in this
enviroment. I am not prejudice
against this instructor or anyone, I
need all of my instructors. My
instructors play a big part in my her power points were helpull and
future, they are my role models. I the review sheet also. the content
don't want them to hate me of class was excellent. Dr. Worley
becuase of my skin color, the idea does well with presenting the
of this is very hurtful. " inormation.
The course content relates the the instructor knows about the
The examinations are moderate subject and is relevant to the subject. Provides examples for
and fair.We are issue three test course. PowerPoint presentation each theory and terms seen
each divided into four or five relate to each chapter. Video through the book. Very helpful The course structure is flexible, we
chapter. Instructor provides review relate to class instructions and instructors expect student to read have time to complete
ahead of time. subject of each chapter. before class. assignments.
very fair. I like the reviews and
having them available a week or so
before the test gives me time to I really enjoyed Dr. Worleys view
prepare and study without having on criminal activity from other Love her! Great instructor! Very
to cram. It also makes it better for countries compared to the US. knowledgeable! Communicates
planning around other tests in She offered great insight to how well on assignments and tests!
other classes. fortunate we are to live in the US. Would definitely recommend her! Great class!!
She can be a little impatient at
times but overall I like her. The
only main issue I have is that she
really doesnt go to in depth with
the material at hand. Some things
in criminal justice need to me
examined a tad bit closer than a
slide. She sometimes flys through
the material and expects everyone
The exams are fair dealing with to pick it up. Her interaction with
material that we discuss in class as No problem with the material the class is spotty at times but she
well as material in the book. being learned.. is funny and that is a ++ for me. Ok by my standards.
Her performance of good
interpersonal relationship exhibit
excellence, a real knowledgeable
and gifted individual in her subject
specialty. The Superb ability to
communicate her ideas and
knowledge where it relates to
student?s needs. The professor
spent time with students, ensuring
that they understood subject
processes, managed to get the
most out of their abilities. The
Professionalism and morals end up
shaping our lives for the better
because of her greatness, and we
deeply admire her for those
talents. Students and UNT @
Dallas as a whole have been
graced with the presence of one Their is so much information to
Was set to course great instructor. Should this comprehend in one semester.Well
standards,however request more Materaiels were pertience to the instructor continue to remain at done, although, maybe it can be
time rather thanjust the bare subtopics and well rounded as well UNT @ Dallas we are so fortunate, cut to two-third or three-quarter
Minimum for the exam. as additional course content. it'll be two or more. rather than all at once.
I felt like you made to many
allotments for those who did not
come to class, and did not take the
time to learn what was being
taught. It upset me to see a
student turn in a term paper the
day we took our final exam. I think
I appreciate the time and effort that by outlining your expectations
you set aside to reviews for the in the syllabus that should have
exams; which were very helpful. I been enough for them to get their
felt like if you studied you would work in on time instead of taking
earn your grade. advantage.
Dr. Worley is very interesting and I
loved everything about her. She
taught at a level that was easy to
The exams were fair and covered understand and I would highly
all the material that was discussed This course is very relevant to my recommend any of her courses to It was easy to follow and
in class. major. other students. understand.
Too many chapters covered in Active, funny, cool, outgoing, open
each exam. I prefer more frequent The course content is very well for comments, and she always
exams with less chapters. appropiate for the class. shows interest in the course.
She can be rude and does not
No valid review to understand respond in a timely manner to
concepts of material for exams emails.
good very good I liked her very much, very funny good
The instructor delivered the
material in such a way that I was
interested in classroom lectures,
assignments and projects. I For me, the structure of the course
enjoyed hearing the instructor was a little difficult to work with.
This class was very enjoyable, the The content of this course is very voice her opinions and at the same Just because I was commuting
professor was fair to all students interesting to me. I truly enjoyed time was impressed at how she from Denton and it was a hybrid
and gave everyone the same how the material was delivered to was able to allow such a large class course. Its much easier for me to
ammount of opportunites to me throughout the course of this to speak their own minds and have learn when I am in class more in
succeed and speak his/her mind. semester. their voices heard. class then I do outside of class.
I have been to two other
universities and she is by far the
worst instructor I have ever had.
Her lectures were not informative
and she showed a general lack of
respect for the students in the
class. There were times when
students had to correct her on her
information in class. She made it
to where there was no reason to
ever come to class as I could be
better prepared for tests and more
informed by simply reading the
textbook. In my conversations
with other students, the majority
of the class felt the same. The
assignment given were
meaningless excercises and had
very little educational value. The
class was very unstructured and
felt like it was running itself with
minimal leadership. I cannot
stress enough how poor this
instructor is. Thankfully she is the
The instructor made the course only one of her kind I have had so
content irrelavant so it is hard to far or it would be enought to cause
comment on this section. There me to transfer schools. This The every other week format is
was no relevance to what she did woman does not belong in the great if the class has a quality
Exams were not teach"." teaching profession. instructor.
I felt she was hard to contact. She
put a lot of emphasis on using the
blackboard, and most of our class
time was spend doing assignments
online at home. In addition, when
the blackboard was down and we
were unable to submit the work by
the due date she did not keep in
touch with us to let us know what
was going on. She also took a lot of I did not feel I got my moneys
time to get our grades back to us. I worth. Half of the classes were
will not be taking another class by spent doing online work instead of
The professor did not give us the Course lectures were not directly her. Very unprofessional. She a lecture. This class was only once
opportunity to review the test related to the tests. She would expects us to have work turned in a week. I understand having one
after it was taken. Difficulty was give her opinion more than fact. on time, but she can not be every two weeks or something,
fair, but most of the material Found it difficult to take tests available or able to contact in a but I did not like the way this
tested on was not covered in class. because lecture did not relate. timely manner. course was laid out.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
I like learning about the different
drugs and how it affect people. I like the way she has her structure
none very interesting. No comment. set up.
Hard to understand at first, but
once she was told by the students
of their concerns, she slowed
down and took the time to make
sure everyone understood the
material being reviewed.
Questions are at times confusing.
This is the first criminal justice
exam that I have ever failed. My Nice person. But at times difficult
normal test average is a A. to understand.
Throughout the class i didnt know
how to study for her class. Her At times the instructor would be
reveiw sheets were just statement rude and did not show patience
over a broad subject, which could when dealing with the students. I
have been many things to know. It believe that an educator
seemed to me she liked to have effectivness is about the students Enjoyed It! It was a learning
trick questions. learning. experience.
I really enjoyed this instructor. She
The exams were challenging, but was easy to contact and gave up
fair opportunity to bring grades up.
She is fair and thorough. I like her
and her teaching style is fine. She
allows us the opportunity to ask
Some of the content (multiple questions, is open to new ideas
choice/TF questions) were difficult Course content is great for CJ and shares stories with us. I feel course structure is good. No
to understand. Make more clear. majors as well as Non CJ majors she is an asset to the University. issues.
The instructor takes offense when
students have a question about
content on the exams. The
instructor is hard to understand.
Does not provide appropriate
reviews for the exams.
To be honest this is one of the
worse instructors that I have had. I
am a senior and normally attend
the UNT Denton campus. The
quality of students differs very
much. I believe that the teacher
took this into account and
micromanaged the students
throughout the semester. We are
all adults and should be treated as
such. This instructor is very rude at
times with students. For example,
if a student disagrees with an issue
she totally dismisses the idea
The exams are fairly difficult. The because it isn't what she agrees
overall average on the entire class with. She is constantly cutting
has not ever been higher than a C, students off when they are trying
which I believe makes for a to speak. Basically she comes off
challenging class. I do like that the The course content went with as a very pompous person. She is
tests were challenging. The tests what was suppose to be covered in right and everyone else is wrong if
covered the materials accordingly. this course. they do not agree with her.
Very approachable. Well always
Difficult , But she does review work with you. Answer questions
before test. This really helps very detailed.. Helps alot.
she has a serious problem with
respect to the class. she talks
down to students, cuts people off
rudely in conversation, she talks
herself up, and holds her own
voice/opinions above anyone elses
in the class. i know im not the only
student who noticed this. i also
think that about 1/4 of the way
thru the semester the class stop
caring and participating. who
wants to have class discussions or
even work up the courage to ask a
question with a teacher like this?
she even rudely shushed" me right
in the middle of a question once
because she anticipated the rest of
the question and thought she
knew the answer. i feel like i
should be able to ask a question of
the teacher in a 3 hour class that i
good tests great content am paying to be in. "
good instructor, can get a little
the instruction is fair, will listen tense when dealing with students
and help if you have issues or dont by addressing them
understand something. course content is relevant. personaly,instead of as a class.
The exams cover an appropriate
amount of material and highlight
relevant concepts well. However,
the questions are often confusing
with options that seem very
similar, too similar. The best This is an excellent course and the Very knowledgeable and
answer" concept makes you think, instructor did a great job covering enthusiastic. Truly likes the subject
but many times it seems like there a lot of material. The content was matter and it showed in a Structure was appropriate to
are more than one good answer. " always relevant to the subject. passionate way of teaching. course.
Very fair, study the material given
and you should do well. Imformative
Dr. Choe is a GREAT
INSTRUCTOR!!!!! This was a GREAT COURSE!!!!!
The course structure was fine, the
group project at the end was a
great way to apply the things
learned from the course. If I could
suggest something for the mock
trial/group project, I would have
like to have been given more
requirements or an example of
how to apply and show our
knowledge of the content we had
learned. For my group and I we did
not establish our plan of action
untill we meet with the advisor
(the advisor was a big help and a
great idea!) Also it maybe helpful
for students to have a visual aid or
chart that organizes the
information into steps or
procedures. I know when I used
the book and the charts or graphs
The course content can be a bit in it I understood the content
confusing, there is a lot of better. Also regarding the book I
information in this course and it understood the information better
can be frustrating keep the ideas when I read the chapters before
of the course organized. As a CJ class and then had the information
major, I sometimes find it difficult reinforced in my mind by the
to keep separated all the The instuctor did a wonderful job instructor. Lastly, I would like to
I believe the exams were very fair information I am learning from my explaining the information in the add the having the powerpoints
and the exam reviews given were CJ classes, because a lot of the course and her expectations for available to print out and read was
extremely helpful. time the information overlaps. the students. extrememly helpful.
Great review........great formats for
testing.....(scantron and writing
sections)
I actually did not do as well on the I plan to pursue a career in law so
exams as I had hoped, but I don't the content was very relevant to Very knowledgeable of the subject I liked the idea of the mock trials
believe that was her fault. me. matter. as our final exam.
Dr. Choe made myself highly
motivated to learn she is a driving
force for me to continue. Dr. Choe
was Highly motivated to teach the The materials were powerpoint
the subject.When students were and book for refference. I like the
having problems, she would stay way Dr. Choe did repetition of
after class to ensure that as an cases and the power point, since it
individual student you eventually would be four chapters for test
understood presented material; purpose;It reinforced my
The exams were fair and not I enjoy talking about this subject;It Since each students' aptitude understanding of the previous and
difficult. is my major! levels varied. recent learned material.
she is awesome...very
knowledgeable and you can tell
she has a true passion for this
subject
This instructor really cares if her
students are learning the material.
If she believes that a student is
struggling and they come to her
for help she does what she can to
help them. I was struggling with
the test even though I knew the
material and she suggested I get
tested for test anxiety and I did
and ended up getting help with
different ways to help improve test
taking. With that help and
suggestion for the instructor I
The exams were all based on what The content in this course is a lot make better grades on my test not This course should be taught in a
was taught in class. They were not however it all goes together and is only for her class but other classes courtroom setting or other facility
to hard. repeatative so it wasn't so hard. as well. type setting.
fair interesting great Instructor easy to follow
Instructor very knowledgeable on
Exams fair Content relevant to course. material. Course structure good.
This instructor was a great
The exams that were given were instructor. He has a lot of respect
from the material that was taught for his students and made us feel
in the classroom. The instructor welcomed every time we walked
made sure that the class knew through the door. He never put
important information regarding down or criticized any of the
this subject and also taught us students and I respect him for
some personal experiences of his The was a good class to take, and I that. I would recommend him to Everything was taught according
own. learned a lot. future students. to plan
I enjoyed the stories you shared
related to the subject matter. I
appreciate the way you allowed us
I appreciated the way you allowed to express our points of view
the exams to be, it gave many concerning different topics, I maintained the course structure
people an opportunity to do well sometimes almost to point of too as he had already set in the course
who otherwise would have failed. much expression. Professional! syllabus.
He is very a good teacher! I would
advise other students to take him
any day. He is respectful,
interesting, and very fair.
The exam was very difficult I have
learn the lesson just had troulble
with the examinations. Exam
needs a new methond
Although the exams were difficult,
I felt that I was well prepared for
them by going to class, taking
notes and doing the study guide in
advance before the exam. The only
issue I had with the exams was
with a type of question, some of
the questions were a tricky
because of the wording and
answer choices. I agree that the Although the subject matter is not The professor did a great job
student should always read the very exciting but is something that giving oral lectures and explaining
question carefully but even after I all CJ majors should know, I felt the material. The only suggestion I
had read the question carefully I the professor did a good job giving have is that the professor use the I believe the course structured was
still had a hard time deciding the examples and keeping the material same edition of the book the loosely based on the book, but I
correct answer because the easy to understand. The book was students are using, it is easier to think the book is a bit confusing
question seemed to trick the extremely detailed and hard to get locate information discussed when the way it has structured the
reader. through. everyone is on the same page. information.
THE EXAMS WERE A TAD BIT tHE INSTRUCTOR WAS VERY
DIFFICULT BUT CASUE YOU THINK tHE COURSE CONTENT ID KNOWLEDGEABLE AND
MORE CRITICALLY AND FULLY RELEVANT TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE PASSIONATE ABOUT THE
COMPREHEND THE MATERIAL. AND TODAY'S SOCIETY. SUBJECTSHE TAUGHT.
Doesn't explain exactly what needs
to be studied. Doesn't give an
appropriate review.
I like the course contents but some She is good teacher she breaks
things the book doesnt break things down give examples and is
None. down. clear and understanding.
The instructor is good she brings
personal experience into the
The material is not hard to learn classroom to help make a point on
but hard to keep from mixing up what she is teaching. More
The exams are a little harder than with other material that dont instructors should attempt to do
in most CJ classes. belong. this. this is a very fast pace class.
instructor is fair, gives extra credit Good instructor, knows her class should be taken to a court,
option that is relevant to the material and has worked in the police station or prison to get
course. subject matter is necessary field. hands on experience.
The exams would have been fair if
there was a clear understanding of
the material to be covered on the
test. Two possible essay questions
were provided; however, if you did
not know the correct answer to
the possible questions then you The topic of this course seemed
would do poorly on the test. There interesting, but the instructor was
was a miss understanding of the ineffective in teaching this course.
answer to one of the questions on There was a group project in which
the first test, in which half of the 7 people had to write a 10 page
class had the same wrong answer. paper, along with a presentation.
Since the essay was over one Getting 7 people together to write
question, everyone that received a 10 page paper about a single
that particular question did poorly subject was extremely difficult,
on the test. There was a very and very unfair. There were so This instructor doesn't appear to
logical reason for the miss many different voices and styles in care whether the students
understanding, but the instructor the paper. Several people in the understand the material, or if they
did not ask nor care why half of group either didn't contribute, are interested. She appears to be The course was structured good.
the class missed that question. contributed poor quality of work, moody, and tends to talk down to The instructor needs to learn to
Normally, it would be a problem if or wrote half of their required the students. Students do not feel connect with all of her students.
most of the class missed one portion. It would have been better comfortable approaching her with She needs to be willing to listen to
question, but since there was only if each person was responsible for concerns in fear that the instructor concerns without making the
one question possible on the test, writing their own paper, but did will respond in her usual sarcastic student feel bad for asking a
that made a significant difference. the presentation together. tone. question.
The instructor is great when it
comes to making sure you learn
the lesson, but when it comes to
respect... she shows none for the
individuals in her class. When
others respond to questions she
ask with a comment she does not
see fit, she makes remarks, rolls
her eyes, and uses body language
I wish her exams covered more of that would belittle a student. I
all the actual chapters we read know she means well, but she
instead of one page out of the The content in this course was should really focus on her
book. very interesting to me. deliverance.
Very informative Excellent instructor!!!
She does not teach" about the
content. She just talks about it.
She is lazy about teaching and
expects us to do all the work, read
the book, understand everything.
That's fine, but then why have an
in-classroom instructor? Make it
100% online. I get NOTHING from
attending her classes but a
headache. For our major grade When a student has a question,
project, she gave us ZERO she belittles them for even asking.
instruction. No guidelines. She why do you want to know?" or
just put us in Groups and told the "shouldn't you know that She takes forever in returning
Essay exams are far too long. She students in each group that had already?!" She makes students grades to us. Honestly, there are
puts up 2 questions and fails to tell taken her previously to explain feel dumb and then we are too many students (including myself)
you to look on your exam to see what she expects. I do not want to embarassed to ask anything so we that do not even know if we are
which # you should write about. have to depend on antoher all just shut up. The bolder going to pass the class. Even after
Then gives you very little points if student's memory for my grade. students will ask questions for us the drop date! I don't know if
you don't recite the book word for She doesn't like explaining because we are too afraid of she's too busy or just doesn't care,
word. anything." getting our head bit off. " but her attitude stinks.
THE EXAMS AREIN ESSAY FORMAT
WHICH ARE EASIER THAN tHE INSTRUCTOR WAS VERY
MULTIPLE CHOICE AND SHORT INTELLIGENT AND ALLOWED FOR
ANSWER. iT HELPS YOU WITH tHE OVERALL CONTENT WAS OPEN DISCUSSION AND
TECHNICAL WRITING SKILLS. RELEVANT TO THE CLASS. FEEDBACK.
This was my first semester at a
university. I did very well at my
Course content consisted of community college and loved my
powerpoint slides during the instructors. I was caught by suprise
weeks we attended class. Dr. that there were professors like Dr.
Cottledge told us not to take notes Cottledge. She was very arrogant,
and refused to go back to slides unapproachable, and unclear on
Dr. Cottledge only had two exams that we had missed. At most, we what was required of us. I did not
which were essay exams. She gave got through four slides each class speak up in class because when
us seven days to prepare for these. time. Consequently, this did not other students did, she was not
I prefer more tests so that it leaves suffice for the material in our friendly or nice to them. She did The course stucture was
room for some mistakes and for book. Discussion was what the not seem to care about our needs unorganized and I was very
learning. She graded very harshly. whole three hours consisted of, so or questions, answering them very disappointed that we did not even
She instructed us to write five I found it unneccessary to attend vaguely. She takes a very long time get close to going through the
paragraphs for this, which I did, class because it would not matter to grade assignments also. This book. The hybrid class structure is
and then when I turned mine in, on the test if I went to class or experience with Dr. Cottledge this not what I was intending to take. I
told me that I should write more. I didn't. She even told us that she semester makes me want to find prefer to learn in a classroom
had only prepared for the five didn't take roll. I realized very another college to attend since she rather than answer a question
paragraphs, so I received a 50 on quickly that it was a waste of my is one of the few professors that every two weeks online, and take
the first exam. tuition money to take this class. teaches my major. two exams.
I really enjoy the instructor and the
The content of this course is very way she engages in the material Even though she gives a set date
important to individuals who are she is teaching. If I can pick a class to do a certain chapter sometimes
I enjoy that the essays are over planning on going into the criminal based on who is teaching it I would it doesnt stay that way depending
what is taught in class. justice field. pick her classes over any other. on the discussion.
I had no feedback on any of the
papers i submitted or the exam i
I had no feedback on what i did so turned in so i could not learn from Structure was fine, instructor did
i could make no improvements. my mistakes and improve on them not seem to care
Dr. Worley appears to really care
about whether the students learn
and understand the material. She
is a very good instructor, but her
test are very difficult, and she
gives too much busy work. The
majority of the students at UNT-
Dallas have jobs, and don't have
time for all of the busy work. I had
more assignments in this class
than my other two classes
combined. Overall, Dr. Worley is
one of the best instructors at UNT-
The exams were extremely Dallas, and I would take a class
difficult; however, Dr. Worley with her anytime. She is always
always gave us a helpful review. available, and makes a person feel
The fact that she have us the comfortable when approaching
review two weeks prior to the test All of the course content and her with a concern. She listens to The course was structured good,
was extremely helpful in doing subject matter was relevant to the the classes concerns, and is usually but again, too much busy work.
well on the test. course fair with her resolutions. This is college and not high school.
FOR HER TO BE NEW TO THE
CAMPUS SHE IS A GREAT TEACHER
THIS COURSE WAS INTERESTING AND IF YOU HAD ANY ISSUES SHE
I'VE LEARNED ALTO ABOUT MADE SURE THAT SHE WAS THERE
THEY WERE GOOD RESEARCHING TO HELP YOUR THROUGH THEM
Study guides don't match the
exams at all...
Dr. Worley has been a delight as
an instructor. Her smile and jokes
help keep the class atmosphere
light hearted, yet focused. Dr.
Worley has made my last semester
easier to take. Her class is very
scale of 1(low)to 10(high) content 8 subject matter 8 long in time, however the time is
difficulty 8 fairness 10 numbers 6 relevance 10 well spent in each class. Very well planned and focused.
I was not that interested, but that Very nice. Knew what she was
was because of the information. talking about. Willing to listen and
Very hard. Paper was hard to write. adjust if needed. Was ok. Nothing special.
very intersting course subject Instructor really knows her stuff
very fair loved learning geat job in her presentation.
THE EXAMS WERE ESSAY
FORMATED AND STIMUALTED THE COURSE CONTENT AND
AND ELEVATED YOUR LEVEL OF SUBJECT MATTER WAS RELEVANT SHE IS VERY COMPASIONATE AND
THINKING. IN NATURE. INTELLIGENT
scale of 1-10, 1 lowest 10 highest course content ,7 subject matter Harsh at times, somewhat
7 difficulty ,10 fairness, number 10 ,7 relevance ,8 arrogant, fair. fair
The course text were interesting. I
enjoyed learning new concepts of
the criminal justice process, and
The essay examination allowed the how the specific functions of the The instructor was very
students to learn the material organization flows, from crime knowledgeable regarding the
discussed in the text. And to be control policies to new prevention course. He was able to think
able to apply the reading to the programs, such as, the outside the confinements of the
policies of the criminal justice environmental design for last text from a global prospective The course structure was
organization. chance offenders. regarding crime control. appropriately outline.
none none none none
absolutely A GREAT
TEACHER...VERY FAIR,
TOO MANY BOOKS, TO MANY UNDERSTANDING. i ENJOYED THE
MIXED TOPICS AND NOT ONE VIDEO CONFERENCE SET UP AS
WERE RIGHT ON TARGET SUBJECT WELL JUST FINE
Enjoyed the class...really opened
my eye on juvenile delinquency Dr.Trulson is very challenging...he
Very Fair. and re-entry to society. wants to see you succeed. Layed out perfectly from day one.
This instructor is always available
to help with assignments or
questions.
All the information in the syllabus He's very knowledgeable able
is out line plan and simple. You what he teach and he really loves
understand everything that is Course content were OK. the what he do. He's passionate when The course was design where
require of you. He goes over the subject matter I really got into the he teaches and he make you want students could understand the
syllabus to see if any student have subject especially when we talk to participate in class. I love a requirements: 1. Assisgnments 2.
any problem with what is required about the juveniles getting a teacher like that. I learned a lot Book reports 3. Midterm 4.
of them. The grading is fair. second chance on life. out of Dr. Trulson class Reading material
The instructor was very
The contents of the course was knowledgeable regarding the
appropriate for the topic of the topic. She had excellent outside
The examination made the student class. The assignments give instructional knowledge of other The structure of the class was
learn the subject matter relating to allowed the the students to learn social problems relating to the appropriately outlined. The
the course material, not just and apply the cases to required topic of DWI, which was helpful in anaylis of the course topic was
memorizing the information. DWI topics. retaining the work. professional done.
NOT ENOUGH INTERACTIONS
EVERYTHING WAS RELIVENT TO WITH STUDENTS. NOT ENOUGH
2 WAS ENOUGH THE COURSE COVERSATIONS WAS OK
Dr. Choe was great...at first I was
nervous becuase she at the
Really enjoyed the course beginning she used court cases to
content...learned alot about help teach intoxication laws. But, I
intoxication crimes that I was really enjoyed it and now I'm
Fair. unaware of. considering Law School. Structure was very organized.
Very approachable and
Quite interesting and appropriate knowlegeable on the subject Love the fact that we did not need
Very challenging for the subject matter. matter. a text book.
She just needs to have a way to
communicate via email outside of
school, i would have to wait over
the weekend to get a response
from her, since she doesnt have a
computer at home
its fairly easy material to Very structured and lays out
This teacher is fair and is not so remember, just need to take time everything for me to turn in my
difficult. to do the assignments Very good instructor. assignments
This class is what you would
expect from a communication
course It's pretty relevent She is knowledgeable its structured ok
The instructor is a great teacher,
however there seemed to be a
The examinations are fair, communication gap between our
however the test preparations class and her in her lectures and
given to us by our instructor could tests by the way that she would
be improved for better The course content was relevant word certain things and try to
understanding. to the course itself. explain them to us. It's a good course.
Dr.Kovalyova is a great instructor
in my opinion and her passion to
The course is not difficult and the The course content is relevant to teach the course is always The course structure is good and
instructor is very fair. the course. apparent. orderly.
To tell you the truth, I was
dreading an all day SAturday class
I absolutely love Dr. Patton. She is but I really wanted to take a class
The course content and subject a great instructor and takes time on grant writing. Well, I didn't
the exams are very fair and we are matter were very relevant to this to explain things until you get it." dread one single minute of class. It
given a review to practice with course. I will be able to use the She also makes time to explain was superb. Definitely got my
before the actual exam. information in my career. things in between classes." money's worth.
n/a n/a n/a n/a
Regarding the course structure - I
just think Dr. Patton needs to
explain how the course is going to
be structured throughout the
semester so it doesn't seem
overwhelming at first. Examples of
work previously done that was
done the way she wanted it done
would be very helpful. I also think
the option of doing the grant
proposal as an individual or with a
group should be an option not
mandatory. I was lucky to have
team members who were pulled
This is a very enlightening course. their own weight but many times
Examinations were very helpful in It has definitely sparked an interest Dr. Patton is a good instructor in in group projects someone is
understanding the material we in me to possibly pursue grant my opinion. I enjoyed her this always doing more than the other
covered in hand. writing in the near future. semester. person but they get the grade.
I thought the information that she
gave was valuable and was
important to the subject we were
learning.
Very well planned content, subject
Very well planned matter, current and relevant. Very patient instructor Very good structure
I would take other classes from Dr.
Joy
It is difficult when students are
required to take tests that do not
seem to have come from the The instructor was professional
textbook. Therefore, I was and encouraged students to
satisfied that (in this class) the Material appeared to be relevant express their thoughts and
examinations were thoroughly to social times and to future career opinions; this allowed for a
based on lecture and textbook. endeavors stimulating class environment.
very good content, subject matter, she has come up with a novel way
Very Well planned relevant and current Dr. Patton is very patient with us. to teach something boring
Testing was done online, which I wish we'd had more Got the feeling that it needs to be
made it very convenient. supplemental materials She needs to speak louder restructured.
fair relevant lovely well organized
Dr. Patton is very knowledgeable
The exams were fair and on of course and course work. It was
information that we covered in a pleasure to take this course
class. under her.
The instructor has a lot of
The course content and subject knowledge about the course and is The course was great I enjoyed
Exams are fair and if you study you matters are appropriate. I learned was very helpful when I needed learning new things about my
will do very well. a lot from this course. her. community.
Professor Patton was an excellent
teacher and she knew what to talk
about to make the class interesting
They were fair. The course content was just right. and fun. I loved the course structure.
I like having four tests. This
allowed me to gauge my
understanding of the material on a This course is very relevant to
regular basis. This gave me the those pursuing careers in helping She is very attentive to students, I would have liked to be able to
opportunity to improve my grade, professions.The course content willing to work on something until meet with employees of non-
had I done poorly on the first test. and subject matter were suitable you understand it, and passionate profits in order to have more
Luckily, I did well on all four tests. for the class objectives. about her job. concrete examples of adocacy.
Part of the course was taught with
expert groups which all
exams and reviews were online. participated in. part on advocacy
This type of review and exam and the other part on course structure was good part
actually taught me quite alot. organizational profiles. Her style was very effective classroom, part online
I did not know much about
The examinations were very fair resource mapping before taking Dr. Patton is very low-key, but she
and Dr. Patton gave the class the course, but I am glad that I did. has passion for the subject matter
enough time and infomation to do The concepts learned will be and she makes her expectations The course structure was
well on each exam. benficial in so many ways. clear. She is a great instructor! excellent.
Dr. Mc is AWESOME, INTELLIGENT,
Love the content and subject and CREATIVE! Her teaching style
matter. The instructor is very helps you to visualize what you are
knowledgeable and provides learning. She is very dynamic in
information in a way that capturing your attention. Usually I
challenges you to think through am in class looking at the clock
situations. The activities provided wondering what is taking the time
were AWESOME. She took what so long to pass but in her class it is
was lecture about and made it over before I get to look at the
practical. I wish I could have had clock and I am left wondering
Very fair her form previous classes. where the time has gone.
She brought a wealth of personal
experience to our class, and I wish
that I would have had more
opportunities to study with her. I
would love to work with her in a
supervisor/intern situation. I
respect her straightforwardness,
her honesty, willingness to delve
into difficult topics, and the
VERY interesting and will help me passion that she has for counseling
fair an appropriate greatly in my work as a counselor and counselor education.
This is the best professor that I've
had at UNT or UNTD. She has real
world" experience!"
thorough and on-target tremendous, important course very excellent teacher very good
Dr. Green is by far the best
professor I've had. He does not act
like a professor he is more of a
mentor and counselor. He did not
just teach and give assigments. He
wanted to know all of us. Dr.
Green did check-in" where
everyone would go around and
just tell how they feel. Some
people were going through alot
I am glad that the mid-term and and just for him to ask "how have
final in this class was not multiple you been doing" meant alot
choice. The mid-term and final was because he did not want us just to
not to teach me how to be a good say "fine" or "good" he REALLY
test taker but to make me a better wanted to know how we were
counselor. The mid-term was a doing. If you were going through
term paper not too hard, just something and just wanted to talk
wished we had more time. The he was there. I really loved Dr.
final was ALOT of work but very Green. Can not wait to have him
much worth it at the end!! for another class."
Dr. Green is a very supportive,
professional, and caring professor.
His door was always open to his
students. This semester was
extremely challenging because of
personal matters, but he had faith
Each assignment was relevant to in me and was encouraging every
No Examinations the subject matter. step of the way.
All assignments were related to The instructor is amazing! He is an
All assignments were difficult but the subject matter of the course. expert in his field and I admire him
this instructor has high The assignments we did in class greatly! I hope to be like him
expectations for his students. were very helpful and rewarding. someday!
Exams were fair and very
applicable to real experiences out
in the community setting. I
enjoyed this Professors testing
style. It was very effective and I Awesome, Passionate about his
wish ALL other profs could do the Course content was extremely profession and us-the students, Structure was a little different, but
same :) relevant to the course. open and a very effective teacher very appreciated :)
Great content! Occassionally I felt
the material during the lectures
was a little vauge, but it was very
informative. loved the projects!!
So incredibly useful! Helped me to Cheerful, energetic, silly,
grow as a therapist and a person. wonderful instructor good structure!
Dr. Green has been a mentor,
supervisor, and wonderful
instructor. He has supported me
and believed in my potential from I love the final project that we are
the day the semester began. That doing. It has made me think
has been a tremendous help in outside of the box" and expand my
getting through the semester and horizons as a counselor and
believing in myself. potential business person."
Course content and subject matter
was relevant to course. The Case
Conceptualization, video sessions,
discussions and additional
assignments helped me to learn The instructor was great along
about my theory and practice my with his teacher assistant. He was More time is needed to practice in
No examination was given basic skills. easy to approach and very helpful. the clinic for this course.
***Please note that the first few Great course. I love the time we
questions were to be answered spent counseling; it really helped The course needs more time. It
strongly agree, not disagree!! I ease my nerves before practicum Wonderful professor!!~ He's kind, would have been nice to add in
noticed too late and couldn't go and makes me feel like a strong supportive, understanding and more specific techniques or to dig
back.****** therapist. funny!! deeper into the theory chosen.
Excellent use of video examples of
counseling styles to incorporate
into sessions. He bridged the
connection between theory and
N/A putting into action.
More engaging lectures are
needed
Extremely pleasant,
understanding, and available.
Obviously tried to cater to our
needs because she altered some
things as we progressed through
the semester. However, her
delivery of the material was a bit
dry- just reading from slides, old
videos, etc. But as the semester
went on, she tried to incorporated
more discussion and
contemporary material which
I liked this course and enjoyed made the environment more
learning about the different engaging. I appreciate her
Very fair and at an appropriate developmental theories. Very attempts and determination to
level of difficulty relevant to my degree. make the course better.
The instructor handled assessment
better than any graduate course I
have taken. Assessments were A broad and informed
purposeful--not hoop jumping." understanding of human
Quizzes, journals, term paper, and development is essential to
the final exam were all done in a effective. counseling. The use of
way to teach and appropriately multi-media was very well done. It Dr. Meany-Walen is an exceptional
assess the student's progress would have been better to have instructor. With more experience
rather than mere rote more current videos. I enjoyed the she will continue to grow and to
memorization which is not class content and valued the be of great benefit and
applicable to how the data is used power point presentations and encouragement to students for
in practice" handouts. They were excellent. years to come. Well layed-out and executed.
The instructor was structured and
cared about him students. He
The midterm was difficult but, it made the material interesting and
was appropriate for the level of Content was very informative. I I'm sure that I will take what I
education we are one. I like the enjoyed learning the basics of learned here and apply it
presentation as a final. counseling. throughout my counseling career. Excellent structure.
Many different modes of learning
were used- each evaluation was
challenging in its own way. I
learned so much in this coure
about myself and very useful,
AWESOME, hilarious, wickedly PRACTICAL information that I will
VERY fair and applicable to future intelligent, and extremely take with me throughout my
endeavors in the counseling field. appopriate to counseling field. articulate. career in counseling.
Dr. Green is the best professor I
have ever had. I felt comfortable
taking the class with him because
he used different learning styles
that really helped me understand
I think the couse was important the content, even though english is
because it gave me a general not my first language. He was very
perspective about the Counseling supportive and challenged me to I like the way the course was
They were ok. skills. go further in this journey. structured.
It is obvious that Dr. Green is
passionate about Counseling and
the children with whom he works.
Only one exam was given in this Its refreshing to have an intructor
class, but I think it was both who cares so much about the
difficult and fair. It tested the course content as well as the
materials learned up to that point. students.
Dr. Green is an excellent professor,
who is genuine, warm, and
The course content is very relative appreciates the uniqueness of
for beginning counseling students. each student. He is honest as a
The examination was appropriate It gives you the basic foundations counselor and maintains
in that it challenged us to to build and increase your skill congruency at all times. He has a The course again is structured in a
understand the material to where level. You truly gain an natural ability to put everyone at way that you grow from no
we could answer the multiple understanding in which to move ease and encourages you to trust understanding to a basic
answer section as well as forward to more intermediate and in yourself and your abilities. I understanding on how to conduct
accurately answer the essay eventually advanced counseling really enjoyed him as my first counseling sessions as a beginning
portion. courses. Graduate professor. level graduate student.
Eventhough, the final exam is in Content is somewhat dry. Good structure. Not to
essay form, it is appropriate and However, Dr. Baggerly makes this Structured, interesting, keeps me overwhelming yet, the end of the
fair. course interesting and fun. invovled in class. course was intense.
This material could be VERY dry
Sometimes the quizzes were a and boring, but Dr, Baggerly has a
little tricky, but Dr. Baggerly would teaching style that is engaging anf
always make them fair. fun! AWESOME!!!!!!!!!1
They were difficult for me, special
the final test. Too many questions. Dr.Baggerly is an excellent
The comparison paper was also instructor. I like the way she used
challenging but I learned a lot from technology and role plays to make
the 2 theories I compared. the lesson more clear. It was fine.
I appreciae the way Dr. Baggerly
grouped the theories together. I
also thought that the way she
taught each theory was helpful.
First she explained the theory then
had us apply the theory to a case
vignette. Great way to show the
theory's practical use.
The final examination was too Very knowledgeable, makes the
long. Great content course content interesting.
Dr. Baggerly is a wonderful
professor who uses various aids
(powerpoints, video clips,
classroom demonstrations, group
activities, etc) to make the class
interactive and very interesting. The course is structured well that
She is genuine and has a good allows you to build an
The course content is relative and sense of humor. She is very warm understanding of each theory in
is organized in a manner that and truly knows the material the same manner for each
The examinations are challenging teaches you all components taught in the course. I look chapter. This allows for easy
in a way that allows you to gain a necessary to truly understand its forward to having her for other comparison and differences of
better understanding of the topic. underpinnings. classes. each theory.
Project was relevant to Internship
No examinations I.
My instructor was very flexible and
available. My only suggestion
would be regarding our one-on-
one meetings held twice during
the semester. Making an
appointment based on when
students arrive for class would be
helpful. If a student arrives late to Enjoyed the later meeting time as
class, she should not be the first well as only meeting every other
Internship is very relevant because one to get in for a meeting and week considering our work for the
No exams - Yes! I receive hands-on training. therefore get to leave early. course is done during the day.
i appreciated her sharing with us
her personal experiences and
clarifying values with us with
fair, thorough very relevant and interesting regard to counseling profession
The hours should not need to be
signed every two weeks and then
totaled at the end. This is annoying
to the site supervisors and
Dr. Lin did an excellent job unnecessary. To much extra paper
No comment teaching the material. Outstanding! work.
The content of this course is Dr. Lin was kind, respectful and
extremely relevant for a school approachable. She was a very I like the time to have lecture and
counselor. I value the experience I personable instructor who shared then practice/experience with a
had in this course to prepare me her knowledge in a very group. The group leadership role
for my career professional way. was extremely beneficial.
Overall, enjoyed every aspect of
this course, from the course
content, being able to facilitate a
No exams in this class, although, group as well as being part of a
the instructor was very fair, group after every class. The class Dr. Lin is a very classy professor.
approachable. Overall, I enjoyed was very small, but was very She has a very positive demeanor,
having her as a professor, and successfully regarding getting to which others feels that she is Course structure was congruent
looking forward to having her for know other students as well as the approachable. Overall, I enjoyed with the content as well as the
internship in the spring semester. teacher. her very much. professor's teaching style.
Awesome instructor. I was a bit
apprehensive since I received my
undergrad from UNT and I was
soooo famiiar with the previous
faculty; fear of the unknow, I guess
... however Dr. Lin made the
transition a learning experience.
Our course was about diversity,
however, stereotypical attitudes
was a recurring theme ... her
professionalism and attitude
quickly dispelled any myths about
Subject matter relevant to the state of UNT Dallas. With
counseling and content geared professors the caliber of Dr. Lin,
towards this need. Each unit we the students will be propelled to a
studied was a learning experience. higher level of success ... her
The journal entries were a way to expertise and experience in her
become more aware of our field makes her an asset to the
individuality and our cultures. The system and she is eager to share
genogram was a great way to her knowledge with students in a Very well structured and
explore famiy history and they way that stimulates interest and organized; the weekly journals
were very interesting; I wouldlove motivates them to explore all were excellent. Did not like the
Assignment in lieu of was fair. to have seen everyone's. aspects of the field. TK20 requirement.
very engaging. very
N/A excellent knowledgeable good grad. level structure
Awesome!!! I learned so much.
This class was some of the best Incredible. She's genuine, funny
discussions I've had. and truly cares. ideal structure. Excellent!
Great instructor!
Content was relevant to this Course structure was okay, but we
Exams were okay, but we could course. He used very good probably needed more time on lab
have had more. examples. He explains the course very well. session.
difficulty=moderate fairness=High Lab should include more practice
number=appropriate class and real time examples
The first part of the semester the
content was too business-
oriented. The second half was a
Tests were relatively easy and fair - bit more challenging, technical-
based on course material. oriented, and enjoyable.
I feel it would better help students
Fair. I would prefer if we had incoporaate the lesson if it was
studyguides that would better help spiced up in a matter that students
on focal points and key learning could better retain and understand very systematic. planned and
interests Fair subject. executed
As difficult as the material we are
overing. Questions were The instructor cares about his
completely fair, they were all students. He does his best to
covered in the material that was Course content felt like a repeat of make sure that everyone
taught. info sys 1 understands the material. Have no comment
I would prefer multiple Most content provided by the
choice/short answer to the required coarse material is
true/false/short answer that was information that any IT major Should be an online course instead
given should already know of in the classroom
The exams aren't too difficult. It The instructor knows what he's
does require studying, though. talking about. The most interesting I wish the structure would have
There is only 2 exams so it's a must The content of the course is very parts of class is when he gets off more examples of the technical
that I study. He is very fair at what basic. I was hoping to get a little topic or deeper into the topic. He things. He usually talks straight
is tested. What's in the book and more technical in how things work. starts writing on the board and he from the slides and it can become
on his powerpoint slides are The material is very relevant to IT shows a lot more of what he boring. I would like more
what's in the exam. professionals in the workplace. knows. exercises.
I think we should have more
assignments to do during the
semester and that will help us to
understand each chapter more as
also we have the opportunity to
make a better grade in class.
I don't think the course is hard if I think it covers most of the
you pay attention to the instructor important topics, subjects, It
because he explains everything teaches you the appropriate The structure is good one topic
very well. information He is a great instructor. follows the other topic
The course content was very
The exams were fair informational
midterm was fairly diffulcult, but would recommend intro to
study guide helped tremendously Content was very thorough Network at pre-requisite
Dr. Lui is great Professor in the
discipline in which he teaches in,
Examination were fair and all class were well structured and
understand. relevant and a understandable. discussion were encouraged. Structure was appropriated
He is so laid back, flexible, and
understands the plight of working
students and parents. He creates a
relaxed atmosphere. One thing
concerns me though, and that is
much of the lecture time is you've
never had this, you never learned
this, you should know this, you
should have had this by now." A
couple of students constantly
blame past instructors for what
they do not know, and I beg to
differ that it is because they were
not focused and did not take
lectures and assignments seriously
receiving grades they should not
have received. I believe this gave
Professor Liu the impression that
Information is difficult for those we were a group of bumbling
who do not have a focus on the fools. I had words in class asking
technical, but makes it pretty this student to stop with the
clear. Very fair in assignments. accusations that professors had
Work with scheduling when not taught the material. Someone
assignments and tests clash with needed to say it and ask the
other courses - very considerate to student to stop giving hard-
reschedule assignments and tests working students, instructors and
by a week. The best at test the school a bad name, and he did
preparation. Its a lot of stop. So it was worth saying. I
information but well worth the hope he knows that we are not I.T.
study time. illiterates."
Great instructor. Would
Material was easy to understand. recommend to other students.
First and last CJUS course and it Worked with my with the other Textbook was too much didn't buy
was interesting. problems I had going on. it and still passed.
Very fair on difficulty level very interesting material learned Very good overall overall balanced
Examinations were easy to
understand and answer.
i think he is doing a great job on
making exams. i think he can add
more flavor to it by adding one or He is very educated and teaches in
more essay questions to the exam. a way that we can understand the I think for a 2 credit hour course it
but that is my point of view. All good. A++++++ subject very well. good luck Sir.... has all it ask for.
The course content dealt with
They were pretty fair. course. Great instructor structure was fine
I was not interested in the course
content and, aside from the final
project, not many challenges were
Tests were based directly off of the presented during the semester to
presented course material and cause me to be more interested in The instructor presented the
were very fair. the topic. material for the course well.
fair average well taught but presented blandly none
The instructor taught it well and
The tests were somewhat The content of the course was did research on the material he I feel that the structure is
challenging. relevant to the course. was covering. appropriate.
Needs to interact more instead of
Simple and self explanatory Too simple lecture, lecture, lecture. Ok
fine fine fine fine
The subject is pretty relevant.
Going through the examples in the He uses the powerpoints too
The exams seemed fair. It was just book show how much we need to much. The material is interesting
over the book/powerpoints. There be ethical and think about what so that helps to make the class The structure is the same
is only two but that's ok with me. we do as engineers. interesting. everyday.
fair, Some people complained but i
think it was fair for the once that
studied.
difficulty=moderate fairness=High
Number=appropriate The
True/False question is not
appropriate.
Instructor did a great job
explaining the difficult topics. He
took the time to re-explain
everything numerous times. I
know some people were unable to
Tests were somewhat difficult but comprehend the material but it
only because of the course was not because of the instructors
content. inability to teach it.
the fairness, and the difficulty was
appropriate with this course. Dr.
Yang made us aware of all pitfalls Dr. Yang is one of the best
and misconception that we may Professors that this university has, course structure was good with all
encountered in the any subject matter was relevant and he's dedication is intense, and concepts learn was in direct
examinations in this course appropriate forthright. relevance to the next.
Would have liked to have more
Exams this semester were easy, Course content was relevant with The instructor did good teaching homework to help learn what is
but were very fair. the class. the class. being taught in class.
Some students take a huge
number of hours in an effort to
finish as soon as possible and our
time is very limited. It is not fair
that an instructor says to the class
that the test is over Chapters 1, 2,
3, 4, 10, 12, 14, and we take the A very good teacher, thorough,
time to study every one of these organized and able educate...not
chapters and the major test everyone is. Only would ask that if
(midterm) is over 1 homework a student asks a question that he
assignment. Not that we did not allows him or her to complete the
study the homework too, but question, fully listen, try to get a
would have focused on it if we clear understanding of what the
knew that 90% of the test was on student is asking, and offer a real,
the homework. I do not think it is genuine and helpful answer. Often
fair. Why have us study all of that he asks if there are any questions,
information that we did not need but do not allow students to
for the test and omit the Overall, loved the class. Database complete the question and then
homework as part of the has always been interesting. gives them a flipped response that
preparation? Even worse, tell a Professor Yang is well-versed, easy is not helpful, especially during so-
few students to focus on the to understand, and very organized. called" test reviews when not a
homework when speaking with It was enlightening and the labs single question can be asked
them individually, and not tell the tied everything together. The completely and no real answers
entire class this information. project was a breeze after doing are given. Listening and answering
Again, I don't think its fair. Just FYI. the labs. helps students gain clarification."
The course content was good, but
we covered a variety of topics,
each in depth, before the test. The
second half of the semester
mostly. The topics were similar,
but also very different in syntax
and application. I would prefer
going over each topic individually
(as we did), and have tests over See course content. I think it's too
each topic - not all topics at once. much with too little
It gets really confusing mixing so tests/homeworks. The amount of
many syntaxes and such. I would material is fine, we just need more
also appreciate more homework r exercises to help us understand
classwork to solidify the concepts the info as we should. There are in-
in my head. I have to know 2 or 3 class exercises, but homework
complex syntaxes in detail for the I like him a lot. He is fun to have, a requires a lot more critical
final, we've only had one good teacher, and is always thinking. Don't KILL us with work,
I think the test (midterm) could homework to help solidify the available outside of class. Hope to but if we need to know all this
have been more difficult material. have him again. stuff we need more exercises.
straightforward very interesting makes learning fun allows for review
I think we should have more
assignments to do and that will
help us practice the database
before the main project. Also, we
need more assignment related to
the book and that will help our
grade too.
This instructor allows the free
exchange of ideas along with
teaching the course in a way
Challenging and tests the limits of everyone can understand. I highly
my education of this topic. recommend him.
Exams were totally written in
essay form and a couple of
mathematical calculations. I have
carpal tunnel and it is difficult to Would like a step-by-step lab in
write and painful. The exams building a simple secure e- Very fair and considerate in
themselves were very good commerce. No hands on is a assignment and test schedule. Need lab and step-by-step secure
otherwise. problem. Need a security lab. Thank you very much. e-commerce build.
course content is obvious,which
may lead to availability of content
being readily available, which
means that when answers are
gotten of the internet, it doesnt
necessarily mean its copied word
for word, it means theres no
better way to word it than what it
unpredictable, is great experince
The course is very good because
you start creating a software
Not difficult at all, its very easy and project from the beginning with Very good, he helps you at all
fun the teacher help and instructions times Easy, understandable, and excited
I love this class.
n/a n/a n/a n/a
Dr. Lui is a professor that is
dedicated to his student, and
doesn't not allow anyone to go
Examination were fair and without the full understanding of
forthright Was structure and understandable the subject matter. Course structure was appropriate
Grading is very subjective and
large percentages loss for basic
requirement. For example, losing
5% of your grade because you did
not double-space and there were
others. No clear numerical scale
for measuring grades. Difficulty
should be included as well, when
some teams have more difficult
projects and requirements. Barely
made the grade although worked
harder that any other team. Lost
15% on phase II. Still not clear as
to why. One or two errors equated
to 15%. I sat and listened to guys
just starting phase II the day it was
due, a couple of hrs before class, I think grading needs to be more
and these individuals received a clearly defined and mathematically
90%. I would like to be able to see objective. Example, -2 points for
the distribution of grades and we each error. 5 errors is a letter
should be able to view all grade. 1 error such as not being
proposals submitted. I don't know. double-space should not cost
I was just concerned. anyone 10 points. Unfair.
very clear about what needs to be
None so far very hands on done very organized and well managed
I find everything in the class very She is fun and very helpful in
They aren't hard if you study. interesting. everything.
Overall the lectures were pretty
good. I learned alot because she
would use examples of real life of
I like the tests since they are online course and of others and we She is very funny and free spirited.
and open book it really helps us to would communicate with the I like it and she always manages to
skam the book. whole class. put a smile on us.
The subject matter and content of
the course are very relevant and
important in all aspects of life, as She is really knowledgeable,
Exams are appropriately difficult well as for my major (elementary helpful, and makes the course very I like the use of slideshows along
and fair. education). stimulating. with relevant movie clips.
The content of the course is very She is very experienced in the
interesting. It really arosued my field. She uses many visuals to help
We didnt have any exams. curiousity. her explain the material.
The instructor is perfect for this
course. I enjoyed having her as an
instructor and would really
recommend her as a professor to
my peers. Plus, she makes the
class super interesting and I'm sure
my peers would say the
samething. She increased our
curiousity in the general thought
of life. She also brought in many
activities and let us engage into
the lecture, something professors
rarely do. She also brought in
videos and personal experiences
This course was actually very very into lecture. She was probably the
interesting to my surprise. I was only professor that would actually
expecting uninteresting make the class flow and get up and
The quizes were not hard at all. information, but the whole course engage in activity. She also had us
They seemed very fair as long as and the instructor as well work in groups and then engage as
you studied the resources and the increased my curisousity. The a class. She is a great instructor
lectures given by the instructor content taught was very much and have no negative experience The course structure flowed very
you were set. useful and very well understood. from her. well. The instructor did a great job!
She was the perfect instructor was
energetic, intelligent, prompt and
easy to understand. She
encouraged us to think outside of
The examinations are very well the box" and be creative with our
explained and given moderate theories on Human Development.
time to prepare for which made The course comment was very Couldn't ask for a better instuctor.
the examinations confusion free. informative and I've learned a lot. 25 on a scale of 1-10."
She is a well knowlegeable person
with experience in her departmnet
it is very easy to understand as and it interested me to become
long as we know the topics. It is actually my favorite class. more involved. It is very understandable.
The course content and subject
This course wasn't very difficult matter was extremely interesting.
because Dr. Baggerly explained She made all of this relevant to our
everything very well. daily lives. Very good instructor. very good course structure.
She is a bit disorganized but other
than that she is a very good
instructor.
The required textbook was an Professor Larson should invest a
unnecessary expense and seldom, little more time away from class
if ever, utilized. preparing for class. Acceptable
He is the worst teacher ever. He
didn't prepare for the class, was
confused, admitted her had no
idea what he was teaching. Very
negative, several times said how
much he hates Stats and doesnt
understand the point of it. He said
he hates the class and the book
and the person who wrote the text
book, sounds like a joke but ask i wish they could get a better
anyone in his class and they will teacher maybe i would know what
not too difficult relevant information tell you he said that. this guy was talking about
Exams had almost NOTHING to do It was THE MOST frustrating class I
with what was taught in class. have ever taken in my 13 years in
Hawkes is where we did all He seems knowledgeable, college. Had me in tears more than
assignments, however he taught The material was diificult to grasp however at times he was very once from frustration of not
from pp slides and I think the since it was unrelated to the unfamiliar with the material he knowing clearly how to do the
book. assignments and tests. was trying to explain. assignments and tests!!!
I believe Dr. Larsen wasn't given a
fair chance for this class. He found
out at the last minute that he was
teaching the class and material
due from the Denton campus was
not readily available.
Dr. Larson was regulartly
unprepared, and was unable to
clearly give students clear and
direct instructions on the chapters.
This was very frustrating as a
student. If Dr.Larson does not like
the Dean or UNT-Dallas as he
Dr. Larson made this class more communicated at least every other
difficult by not being prepared. class he should not teach there. As
The University should NOT a student paying for my tuition, I
schedule a STATS class in an would appreciate being taught by
auditorium. someone who wants to be there.
I know that he is new to this
subject and was thrown in last
minute, but didn't seem prepared
to teach the course. Learned more
from Hawkes. Also the classroom
hindered the professor. You would
think that a new building would
have the latest technology. A
samart board that allows for quick
switch between PowerPoint and
writing on the board would benefit
this classroom. It was very difficult
to make the switch. Bad design
when there is no room to write
when the projection screen is
down. May want to re-think this!
I would not take this teacher
again.
He would spend too much time at
the beginning of class bashing the
department and other teachers
I disliked the way the exams were and the book. He was very
administered. It seemed like none discouraging, and therefore I was
of the course materials, or the not interested in the course
Hawkes materials was being materials. He would frequently
tested, which was the stuff that we say that we would not get it, so I
were working off of. would tune him out.
I really enjoyed this intructor. I
thought he explained everything
very thoroughly and took as much
time as needed to answer
questions the class had. Also
enjoyed his witty humor.
The instructor seems to have
problems about charisma because Course should stick to hawkes or
his classes are very boring and he don't use it at all. It is very difficult
takes a long time doing a single to do homework and quizzes using
The course content is very example. The class period is not hawkes and then take the test
interesting, but it would be more if enough apparently since he always which has a different format.
The course is difficult by the way the test were similar to the book try to rush things at the last Hawkes and the teacher go
the professor teaches it. and hawkes minute. opposite directions.
The structure of the course is well
developed. The only concern is the
book layout. It is as if the book was
Dr. Friesen is very knowledgable tore apart and contents
and is an awesome instuctor. rearranged and the book put back
Answers all questions and does together. However with the
The exams are in depth and cover Dr. Friesen ties all componenets not hesitate to explain any direction of Dr. Friesen the book
all material covered in course. together in depth. questions. was bearable.
I thought this class was fairly hard
as there were not enough Instructor was very helpful in class,
opportunities to make up a bad but in private meetings he could
test grade. Having only 2 exams Subject matter was fairly hard. be very condescending. He does Course structure just needs more
the entire semester makes one Some lectures seemed to not seem very effective at assignments that are weighted
bad exam grade very unforgiving. accomplish nothing. lecturing. heavier.
It would be great if the exam
questions are similar to the
Hawkes exams or chapter
questions. This would make the in- Good. But it would be great if the
class exams a little easier to online quizes could have more
handle. N/A Good. time to complete.
Nice guy but should dumb down.
Many dont have fundamentals
Too esoteric when explaining required and it makes the class
subject matter difficult
the exams are somewhat difficult
due to the names you use for
things such as confidence level and
others are different that what they
are called in class and it is hard to
determine what the test is asking it would be helpful if the test on
you to find because on the hawkes hawkes and the test given in class
test it actually tells you what it was the same and also it you were
wants you to do. given more time on the timed test.
Makes complex concepts even
more complex, very tough to get Course structure is ok, I like the
Not that easy, but having past Hawkes works well explaining to the level he is operating on Hawkes for actually understanding
tests available helps out alot. some of the concepts. when explaining statistics. what the hell I'm doing.
You are not really required to be in
Also has a side station to workout Very good at replying to messages the course since the modules are
Exams are only two and I think things which works great in and get things across. Great on the side but I still liked the
three would work better learning the modules instructor over all course A LOT.
Very knowledgeable and
Not enough time to complete accessible
I wish it was on Hawkes... It's kind
of hard doing it on paper when we
do everything on the computer He's the BEST!!!! I love his class Very easy to follow
There are two exams. They are
well weighted, however quite The instructor is very open to
difficult. The content is very on course. questions and willing to help. The structure is fine.
We only have two exams in this The instructor tries to explain
class. We have a midterm and a everything as clearly as possible,
final. They are a bit challenging but but sometimes you get lost
we are allowed to use our books anyways. But the instructor is very For the course structure, we have
and notes. If you have good notes, understanding and respectful. He homework from Hawkes Learning
the exams should not be very The course content is not very always asks if you have questions Systems all the time. We also have
hard. difficult, and it is very relevant. regarding the material. excel quizzes and our two exams.
The material is very difficult, but if
you pay attention in class and do
the homework, it will make things Course content is explained in full Very great instructor, he is highly
easier. measure recommended. course structure is good
Dr. Friesen knows his Statistics for
A bit confusing on some subjects sure. He does a good job of
for me personally in that I had not working through a problem that
been in a stats class in a long time. you don't understand. I do
Hawkes was a very helpful tool in sometimes feel like he uses
Consistent with previous exams understanding the materials and language that isn't always
out on Course Website. Nothing formulas. Can see how the consistent with what is in the book Enjoyed the section when we got
really out of the ordinary or material covered is relevant to real or Hawkes and that can leave you more into Data Analysis and using
something you weren't expecting world problems a bit puzzled some times. Excel as a Statistics Tool
The course is great for those that
Examinations are difficult but with are looking to find new ways to Dr. Friesen does a great job
enough study one can obtain an A. analyze information explaining the material. Structure is focused
Dr. Friesen made himself available
outside of typical classroom hours
Quizzes were generally fair and to discuss required coursework.
relative to the materials covered. His flexibility and willingness to
The number of quizzes was assist professional students is
appropriate for this course. greatly appreciated.
I think this class would be better if
offered in a lab where the excel
Dr. Friesen is a nice guy but simulations can be practiced in the
sometimes he can be windy and presence of an instructor. I tried
very abstract. He does an taking it online completely, I think
excellent job of interacting and that is a horrible format. The
showing the procedures needed to human interaction is needed, but
do the assignments. Not the most the simulation piece would be a
interesting subject matter. great addition.
Very difficult and not explained the instructor does not explain the the structure of the course is well
properly Course content is difficult to grasp material well designed
I think he is a good instructor, but I
didn't feel that he covered things
that were on his tests. He did not
go over graphs much in the second
half, but the second test was all
about the graphs.
This course is very difficult; if you
This instructor gives exams that the course content is relevant to The instructor explains the power- understand something right now
are difficult only students that the course but it should not be as point slides and has too many you need to practice or go over it
understand the economics hard as it is. Many students are writing on the lecture notes(power- so that you can understand it in
concepts would pass the test. struggling with this class. points) the future.
hard subject, excellent professor
He really knows a lot about the
subject, but not sure about the
The class really needs to be taught teaching part. You should put
by someone who knows how to Material was ok, is just the people that know how to teach
teach. teaching and that know the subject. To much material
wonderful instructor! If you do
your part he will do his. This
instructor will help you especially if
you help yourself!
This class was very difficult, but he
was very helpful, helped me to
understand in his office hours.
hard to understand just too
advanced and fast.
I feel that the there should have
been a preriquisite before taking
Exams are really difficult even The instructor is good the course this class. Macro should be taken
after you study. The course content is relevant itself was difficult. first.
the exams are very difficult. the
way he teaches and the way the he is a great instructor except he
book reads are not how he writes does not prepare students for the
tests. very good content test in my opinion better test prep
The exams are fair as they are over The course content is interesting
exactly what the instructor cover when the instructor relates real life Instructor sets a good lecture for
in lecture. examples of the material. the class. good
He is approachable and easy to
talk with about the course
material. He has a genuine
concern that the students
understand the content.
Instructor was great in regards to
Exams were fairly difficult and material and content. If needed
challenging. Exams were clear and instructor would go over things course was good and would
challenging at the same time. until fully understood the material. recommend to other students.
The course structure was easy to
The exams were very fair and The subject matter for this course The instructor has a great grasp on follow and helped me get through
reflected the course material and was very relevant and helped me economics and how they relate to the class and retain the
lectures to a tee. with other classes as well. our world as students. knowledge.
This is not a difficult course and The course content is relevant to Dr. Wong is not the best instructor The course structure is of nothing I
the instructor is fair. the course. in my opinion. have ever heard.
the exams are difficult and macro should go first then take
challenging. micro he is a good instructor hard
I felt that conducting the principal
interview and developing my own
mock intrview and responses were
some of the most enlightening The course structure was in
assignments of the course. I felt as alignment with the pacing of the
if the end of course exam was well- Dr. Shouse was amazing as an course. There was an excellent
rounded and cumulative in nature. instructor. He was interesting, balance of group assignments, and
I believe the class sessions were funny, and considerate. I enjoyed individual assignments; all of
meaningful, relevant and engaging the pacing of the course, and I which helped me get a global
and I am very thankful to have had enjoyed the concept of Teacher- perspective of Instructional
this as my first course at UNT.. See above Taught" lessons. Brava." Leadership.
The exam was fair and was not Content was very relevant to the The instructor was great. Lots of
that difficulty. course. insights. Course was well structured
The opportunity to present to the
class made me not just read the
material but also understand it. It
All the information I got during this He is really good. It was a great was a challenge for me and an
Examinations were faim either in course will be vital for me in the experience for me to have the opportunity to get some skills I will
number or difficulty. future. opportunity to be in his class. need.
Course was well organized and He was approachable. He
books were critical to the learning provided feedback and asked
process. questions to make up ponder.
Great course content; much Great instructor; extremely Remained on syllabus timeline the
N/A literature and reading knowledgeable entire semester. Good job!
Excellent
Course content was very relevant Followed syllabus to keep
Examinations were fair with to course,detailed and varied Great instructor, very professional, structure of course and updates,
subject matter from instructors delivery(lecture,discussion, knowledgeable of subject matter adjustments,reminders were
teachings. handout, reading, etc). and always helpful. constantly given by instructor.
Enjoyed readings... Very Appreciated the experiences of the Very comfortable and student
interesting... instructor as an administrator. friendly
short,effective; would have liked
to remain on syllabus schedule Good course; Dr Dunlop presented Relatable, easy to converse with, Please see above. Good course
more budget in a realistic way thorough in his explanations structure though
He was interesting and had
relevant information in regards to
Final Exam was a great way to real world instructional and
show mastery of content adminitrative issues
My professor made the classroom
environment very comfortable and
safe for the exchange of ideas and
information. His experience and
knowledge was very helpful in
assisting me to understand how
the textbook information is
applied in real life. I appreciate
All information presented in the every story that was shared. He
course is adds value to my pursuit definately left an impact on me
of education administration. The and my future endeavors. I am
experience of the teacher helped very grateful for the knowledge The course structure was fitting to
to make the information real and and experiences that were shared the schedule of a working
relevent. beyond the text book. professional.
Course content was very detailed
in line with course title and Instructor was very knowledgeable Syllabus was followed to keep
Examinations were in line with syllabus and very clear to of subject matter, very thorough in course structure and instructor
curriculum taught and very easy to understand and very relevant to instruction and very professional gave updates, reminders,
follow. my course studies. and helpful. adjustments as needed.
The instructor made the course
The examinations was on point The content was very relevant to fun and exciting. The freedom to
and clear. I understood everything the training needed for express ideas was the best part of
that was assigned for the exam. administrations. the class. Course structure was very good
I am so excited about all the new
information I acquired during this I liked the small groups because
course. I can not imagine how I The instructor is very professional we were able to learn not only
I do not have any problem related survived in the system without and he has great knowledge in the from the instructor but also from
to the examinations. that information. subject he is teaching. our classmates.
I learned how to read a school He is approachable. He give open
budget and how to find creative feedback which gave me food for
ways to implement programs. thought.
Fortunate to have been his
student.
Exam not required. Great Great Great
The requirements for the
interneship were not clear; we
were given a rubric for the
practicum and the internship with
conflicting information so it was I think more meetings would have
difficult to determine exactly what been helpful; especially, towards
was expected. the end of the semester.
Strict but fair...scary at first, but is
very effective, knowledgeable, and
Appropriate Very appropriate and interesting sweet! Appropriate pacing
Dr. Johnson is truly a professional
Very detail...spent alot of time and role-model for women
working on the essay questions. I thoroughly enjoyed...topics were aspiring to be Administrators. I
Definitely challenging very interesting learned alot. very good
i thought the instructor did a
I thought the examinations were excellent job. She was very
thorough and a good measure of I enjoyed the subject matter and professional and gave a great
the knowledge gained. the approach taken to learn it. perspective from her experiences.
I loved how she integrated the
school visits to tie in all the
information we learned in class to Very professional, and expected
our professions. nothing but the best from us.
There was an awful lot to do for
this class, but all of it was
interesting to contemplate. I
I came into this class wondering would recommend this class. Also,
how practical the application the edad program structure at
I think there was a lot to do for this would be of this topic, but Dr. UNTD is awesome and this class is
class, but all of it was relevant to Johnson did a fine job with Dr. Johnson is tough but fair. Her one I would not have expected to
the topic. I enjoyed the material. showing me the relevance. expectations are unwavering. have been so powerful.
The course content caused me to
decide that this master's degree Dr. Ortloff has been a thorough
can be used for somethingother instructor. He emphasized the
than a principalship. Community critical importance of the school
relations is a huge part of and community relations The course was structured well.
education and having experience partnership. Also, he stressed that We were able to have discussion,
as a teacher offers me a great knowledge of your community is projects, research topics and
The exams were fair and closely advantage in the education Public crucial to the first year principal's debate all while learning about
matched the objectives taught. Relations Department success. school community relations
The Instructor had very good
intentions, but limited knowledge
The course had great information, of the course made it difficult to
Examinations were of great value; as well as the book designated for follow. Assignments given didn't
however professor had limited the course was very informative, seem to have any relation to the
knowledge or ability to explain yet limited time was spent using objectives to be met by the end of
expectations the book. the semester.
The instructor was always
N/A for this course. Projects were The course content was relevant prepared for class with relevant The structure of the course was
very fair. for this course. powerpoints. aligned well.
I thought the required work was
The content was good but too similar to an online course. I did a
much busy work and not enough Dr.Ortloff is a nice guy but not a lot of 'busy' work and didn't learn
affective application. great teacher. too much.
Course was appropriate for
content.
Appropriate Very appropriate and informative Has great experiences Pacing is appropriate
I really enjoyed this class. I learned Dr. Dunlop is an AWESOME
alot about the different programs instructor. Made the class very I liked it...I would definitely
offered. enjoyable. recommend to others
This is the 3rd course I've taken
with Dr. Dunlop. He always
connects the theory and best
practices to what is actually going
on within the school district/on
campuses.
I feel that this instructor is an a
great asset to UNT Dallas. i have
taken mulitple classes with Dr.
Dunlop and feel that I have gained
knowledge that can be applied
directly to the job I am seeking.
Dr. Dunlop is more relaxed about
how he structures the class and
allowed for us to help guide the
Dr. Dunlop is a fair, and yet very topics that we covered in the most
caring professor. He understands Dr. Dunlop always strives to make Dr. Dunlop is a great addition to depth. It was a very interesting
that we all have jobs and families the course relevant to what we the edad faculty and I enjoy his class and gave me lots of great
along with our classes. need in today's work climate. classes a lot. information.
The instructor was very The structure of the course allow
knowledgeable of the subject the students to obtain and retain
The contents where within the matter, as well as, beyond. He has the course subject. The
topic of the course. The relevance an advance education that allowed assignments give where within the
The exams are appropriate and for school educators aloud him to teach and incorporate the scope of the text, that allow the
informative for the subject matter. creativity by combining other global aspect of education from students to retain and manifest
The course provokes thought disciplines, ie. business and both policy and economic the information beyond that of the
beyond the required text. criminal justice policies. prospective. course.
Not sure; have not taken yet. Great course Great instructor Great!
The instructor was very into what
The content was relevant and was he is doing. Loved the fact that he
the final is a clear reflection of the not seen as busy work. Not has been in the field and knows He structured the cource very
coursework that we have covered. overwhelming how it is. soundly.
I wish the final could be a
blackboard exam or TK20 Group/Individual presentations
assignment like the other courses. take too much time.
Dr. Woodrow is exceptionally
Highly relevant. professional.
I think the instructor is very
knowledgeable in his field. He has
alot of insight as to how education
has developed and evolved over
the years.
I have enjoyed Dr. Woodrow's
philosophical viewpoints. He
encouraged vivid discussions and
respected different viewpoints.
Relevant to today's culture in the
Fair school I would take him again. It was fine
Content were extremely rekevant Dr. Woodrow challenged me all
The examinations were fair and and I am very glad that i took the through the course. He had high
difficulty level was appropriate course expectations. Course structure was adequate
Dr Woodrow did an excellent job!
I loved his class. He always
wanted input and encouraged us
to elaborate.
Very informative and
knowledgeble. He has taught given
me a wealth of information that
will enable be to become an
effective leader
The course work was relevant to
na my career goals.
it was fine, as usual I get more
from the discussions with my
peers than most books I've read in
Very fair enjoyed the book review enjoyed the open discussions this cohort
Assignments were relevant and Dr. Johnson is patient, supportive,
enough time was given to The content was meaningful to my enlightening, and a wonderful
complete them current and future field professor
The course itself is probably
difficult to make creative and
interesting.
She knows the subject matter very She is good to everybody, a good
She fair in everything she does well teacher well tructured
Very crucial because it was
benefical when taking the Very knowledgable about course
N/A principals exams. matter.
Dr. Forsythe is very knowledgable
regarding the content of this The course structure was good. It
course. She has a wealth of had a nice variety of activities and
experience that she shared with us projects to support the
regarding specific topics. information to be learned.
We welcome Dr. Forsythe to the
UNT family. It's been a pleasure
learning from you. You caused us
to look at Curriculum in a manner The course was very organized and
never done before. Thank you. of great structure.
The portfolio and Action Research
project were time consuming and He is a master
a lot of work. It was applicable teacher/administrator and I have
though and so I learned a lot. learned so much from him.
Ny professor was extremely
knowledgable and my
understanding of the information
presented in this course was
expanded.
Dr. Shouse is a great instructor.
He is very knowledgable in his field
and has so much to share with his
students. He is very genuine and
incredibly enthusiastic about the
ED ADMIN program. I will miss
seeing him since I am graduating
this semester. Very rigorous and necessary.
He is great...very kind and willing
to go above and beyond to help! I
really enjoyed having him as a
professor.
Dr. Guavara is a fair teacher. She
has taught us so much. She does this course is relevant in the fact
not give test, after test after test. that we must be aware of the Dr. Guavara conducts herself in a
But what she does is give us extent of bilingualism in the very professional manner. she is a
projects that are fun and pertain education system and what we very structured teacher. She
to our class. She has filled us with can do as teachers to knows her stuff! She is a great role
knowledge that will follow us accommodate these students and model for future teachers. She is
throughout our teaching careers. their needs. a keeper!!!! Wonderful
Dr. Gueverra is very approachable
and willing to work with students.
I knew nothing about this subject She is very enthusiatic about her
before taking this class. I learned subject which in turn excites us
many practical things from this about the content. She stays
She is fair, and covers appropriate course that I will definitely be able updated with the most current ESL
materials related to classwork on to incorporate into my future subject matter and is very She was clear about what she
test. classrooom. knowledgeable about her subject. wanted from the students.
She was extremely fair and gave The course was relevant to the
students opportunity to do subject, she also gave us many
assignments not too close in handouts that will help us when
between. This gave students we are ready to take teacher This course was intrumental to my
enough time to prepare. certification exam. I enjoyed being in her class. career as a bilingual teacher.
Dr. Guevara is a great role model.
She teaches us what we need to
Examinations challenging, but not Course content and subject matter know now and in the future. She is Course structure followed the
difficult. relevant to this course. very knowledgeable. syllabus.
Dr. Romano is a great person, but
as a professor I would not
recommend her course. She is not
clear on her assignments. While
she was out of the country rather
than following the syllabus and the
students do indpendent work as
she had previously stated, we had
to come in and do busy work." The
work was done by us but never
The course was great. It would turned in or discussed. We are not
The only exam given was the final. have been nice to use the entire high school students we are paying
It was too long for the amount of book since it was purchased and for our education and I expected The structure of the class could
time that was given. not just parts of it. more than that. " have been more organized.
This instructor was nice as a
person! She was very unclear on
some assignments. On several
occasions, my classmates and I
were confused about assignments
and the expectations regarding the
assignments. Her work and
grading system didn't balance out
either. On one assignment she had
four different parts to it and it was
only worth 5 points. On one of our
weekly reflections, it had about 3
pages of questions that were 2 and
3 part questions, all for 10 points.
She graded hard on assignments
and half of the time we weren't
sure of what was expected.
Another thing that was hard to
deal with were the SURPRISE
ASSIGNMENTS!! I am fully aware
of the syllabus being tentative, but
I felt like it got out of hand. Before
I could finish one assignemt, there
was another assignment AND IT
WAS NOT ON THE SYLLABUS!! On
one of my papers she commented
on how bad my paper was BUT I
WAS TO THE POINT WHERE I
COULD NOT HAVE A GOOD
QUALITY OF WORD BECAUSE OF
THE QUANITY!!! IT WAS SO
MUCH, I WAS JUST TRYING TO GET
THINGS FINISHED!! Even with the
The content of this course was final. She said out final lesson plan
very interesting.I do believe we would be our final. I completed
could have gotten more from this that only to find out that we were
class than what was offered. going to take another final. This
The majority of the assignments
were very big,long, and intense.
Syllabus was given by UNT Denton
and from my understanding
teachers didnt have a saying... I
wish teacher was able to make
adjustments to syllabus as she saw
needs. We did learn but I think for
many people it took away part of
the enjoyment from the class.
What saved it was the instructor
methods of teaching. Loved that
we did not have lectures from
powerpoint. We learned from real
life examples, discussions, and
conversations. There was very
minimum pencil and paper"
lecture and I think we learned a lot
better by that way( discussions). "
Everything that was taught was
relevant. All the assignments were
great reinforcement for what we
were learning although there was
an excessive amount of them. I
feel that overall I would have
enjoyed this course more if there She's a very open and
was less emphasis on outside approachable professor. She really
The final exam in this class was assignments and presentations makes it a goal to reach out to her The course was well structured
extremely long. I barely had and more teaching on the part of students and make sure they gain and directly pertained to what
enough time to finish it. the professor. an understanding of the material. we'll be dealing with as teachers.
The things that were not clear to
me in my edre class were cleared
here.
related to material covered Great instructor!
awesome! Great at what he does...
Good. The content was good. He is a good instructor. The struture was good.
Mr. Figuereo is a charasmatic
individual who seems to have the
student's interest in mind but
consistently cancelling class is
unfair to the students who were
eager to learn. Mr. Figueroa is
capable of being an extraordinary
professor but this not show in this
class. Class, This was an e-mail he
send us stating flojiritis" as an
excuse for not coming which in
Professor does not seem to be fair aspanish means lazyness "I hope
in his grading. He took grades for all of you received my text
attendance but hardly showed up Inructure taught a few times but messages that we do not have
himself. A majority of the classes his lessons were weak in content class today, Tuesday, Nov. 2. The
were canceled yet he still epxected and retaught content I had already doctor says I have flojeralitis.
us to come to class whenever he learned in order courses more in Some of you will get that, some of There was no attention payed to
felt like having it. depth. you will not."" the structure of the course.
Mr. Figueroa is a very nice and fair
person. I do believe that he should This course should include a
be a bit more stern on students variety of projects for us. I felt the
who are slackers and leave course was too generic and didn't
everything for last. Some of these offer anymore information that I
Examinations were given in a students took advantage of his didn't already know. I was
timely manner and I felt prepared I believe this course should have leniency and I didn't find that to be expecting a lot more from this
for each one. I felt they were fair more challenging projects and fair for those of us who worked course since it is the foundation of
and were related to the assignments. At times I felt like I extra hard to get assignments in bilingual education which is my
information provided in class. wasn't being challenged enough. on time. degree path.
Exams on the material we had I think this course will help me be He is very helpful, gives advices Excellent structure, easy to follow
covered. prepared for the Exit Exams. and explains things with clarity syllabus
This instructor did a good job
The content done definitely was teaching the course and I would
The exams were fair related to the content. recommend him.
knew the subject very well. always deadlines were very flexible.
not difficult. Definitely fair. this course was very informative. encouraged everyone to assignments were very well
understandable. prepared well. very well organized. participate. explained.
Exams are in line with the I really enjoy the lay out of the Nancy Beavers is very passionate
materials covered in class. textbook. about her classes. Very interesting course.
The course structure was
balanced. There is a lot of
observations that require time in
The instructor is okay. She's not the community. This can be hard
The exam was the perfect level of my favorite but she's not a bad to do at times, especially for
difficulty. It was fair and teacher either. I feel like she is a students who work full time during
understandable. I did not like that Course content was very relevant little narrow minded on some the day. I feel as if our last two
I did not receive feedback because and interesting. I have taken many topics and is not willing to listen to semesters as an education major is
I still have no idea what I got child development classes so a lot new ideas that are mentioned for observing and learning how to
wrong on the midterm. of the content was review. during class discussion. teach.
The instructor was great and
understanding/patient with the The structure of the class was
The examinations for this class The course content was excellent students when we did not appropriate as well as the
were appropriate for the and fair. for the subject matter. understand the material. materials.
There was not enough structure in
this class. Assignments were not
clearly due at certain times. Also
grading was not done in a timely
manner and was graded in letter
grades when the syllabus was
written with a points scale.
Very understandable and Always made the class interesting
Very easy to understand interesting and she is very understanding Very good
Dr. Guevara made the class
I enjoyed that she teaches you to interesting, and shared her own
learn, and not like other experiences with the class to gain
instructors that give you busy work insight from a different
just to keep you busy. perspective.
SHe was very scattered and it was
very difficult for anyone to fllow
her schedule because she changed
The subject matter was very the outline everyday. She never
repetitive and I wish we had had a responds to emails and lets us
better textbook because the one know at the very last minute any
The exams were fair and pertsined we had was too word heavy and changes she makes. We never got
to all the matter discussed. hard to focus with. back any of our assignments. It should be an online class.
fairness very good material good teacher
The exams were at our level. The content was informational. Good instructor. The course sturcture was detailed.
She is an awesome person; very I never know exactly what will
knowledgeable, creative, caring happen when I come to class.
and inspirational, but sometimes Sometimes I have an idea. This can
We don't have many; I am Sometimes I am confused about her assignments scheduling or be stressful, but the instructor is
generally confused as to what will the requirements for the structure is confusing or flexible and things generally work
be included when we do have one. assignments. disorganized. out in the end.
The couse structure is similar to
the text in the book. Useful
information and important topics
Yes, all content pertains to the Great instructor. Respectful and that will be useful in my teaching
Challenging and fair. text/course full of knwledge. career.
The class size was too big and I feel
that I would have gotten alot more
out tof the class if it would have
been a smaller size.
She is great in explaining the
Exams on material we have content and make a connection so Very easy to follow structure in the
covered in class. Relevant to my field experience. that we understand. syllabus
She's great. I truly like her a lot.
Fairness, but a challenge. She was caring and knew her
Questions covered material in Well prepared. Group activities material. Taught lessons well, group discussions. we were always
class and book. and cooperative learning. where they were understood engaged.
The course structure was good.
The only problem many of us
students had was through TK20. It
was sort of difficult because Dr.
Examinations were difficult, but Forsythe was learning it along with
not in a horrible way. They made I learned a lot in this class. The us. However, she was a very
us think on a higher level and book was excellent and the subject Dr. K is an excellent instructor. She honest and gracious teacher. She
apply what we were learning in and content matched the course was always willing to help in any did everything she could to help
our reading or through lecture. outline. way that she could. us.
I really enjoyed having her for this
course because hse was organized
and had us discuss current issues
surrounding education and how it
ties into the past and future.
The only complaint I have is the
way tk20 was handled. I think it
would have made more sense to
divide the standards and artifacts
during the entire semester,
instead of cramming it into the
end. I feel as though my portfolio
is not diverse as it should have
been because we really did not
have ample time to work on it. I do
understand this was the first time
the professor thought this course,
but I think focusing more on tk20,
would have been helpful, since it is
pass/fail.
The content of the course was
This overall exams was fair and wonderful. I enjoyed everything
meaningful. we discuss in the class She was FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! structure was fair
Dr. Forsythe is the most
professional and knowledgable
instructors that I have ever had the
privelege of being taught by.
Excellent instructor! I just wish
there had been someone to help
out in our class on the days we
were discussing our portfolios in
TK20. She was just as new to TK20
as we were which was not her
I did not like the fill in the blank fault. We all had a lot of questions
questions on the first exam and I and it got very confusing at times
thought the multiple choice trying to upload artifacts,
questions were okay. I really liked coversheets, etc. It would have
the essay portion of the test the been nice to have someone show
best because I got the chance to I really enjoyed this course and her how things were done so she
explain what I knew and give learned a lot especially about my could then explain it to us or have
examples versus just memorizing portfolio, which will help me in someone come in and show the
facts/vocabulary. looking for a teaching job. entire class.
The exams were challenging but
fair. I believe that the exams were
a fair representation of what we
learned, and really tested our
knowledge. Since this is a class I found this instructor to be very
where we cover many topics knowledgeable, easy to
important on our exit exams it was understand, very acessible, and
nice to have her challenge us to very understanding of students'
think. needs.
the examinations were fair, the course content was relevant to
everything that was taught in the the course. the professor the professor was great,I strongly the course structure was
classroom was on the exam itself. explained everything clearly. recommend her to other students. acceptable.
I like her as a person but the class This course should have been
was unorganized and very structured around the portfolio
Reviews did not connect to the frustrating because she was and we did not even begin really
exam. Nor did they prepare you unable to explain or help with talking about it until two weeks
for the questions that were asked. Content was useful. issues that came up with TK20. before it was due.
This was my first time using TK20.
So, it was a struggle learning from
a professor that was also learning
how to use it at the same time.
But she always found the answer
She is a new instructor from to anything she didn't know and
another state, but she is highly quickly answered her emails that
knowledgable about the Texas pertained to the TK20. She also
education rules and regulations! allotted a small extension due to
She is easy to understand and very some of the difficulties we were
approachable when something is having as a class which was very
unclear. much needed and appreciated.
I wish she could just prepare
herself a little more on the
knowledge of the content. To be
very well informed of the materials
student will need for the course
such as the TK20. I wish, as I think that if we could start
mentioned before, that she could working on the TK20 since the
focus more on the materials that beginning of the semester, that
need to go in the TK20, so we dont would help out a lot. For example
have to be stressing on getting the do two or three standards every
work done that last weeks of other week or one standard per
The content was a little confusing school. She is a good instructor, week this could allow the student
since it was a portfolio class I wish but since this was her first year, I more time to go over what they
we could have worked more on believe she should have had some have and correct if needed. This is
that than other material that may knowledge and more information a portfolio class and that is what
not have been so much relevant to before the semester started. we need to be working on since
the course. Above all she is a good instructor. the beginning of the semester.
This instructor was very Pretty good would rather have
difficult this was very good useful stuff approachable and professional. more help with TK20
Among my colleague, this class has
always been referred to as the
portfolio class" when in fact, it is
much more than that. I think
students were misinformed and There should be a graded
then frustrated because they checkpoint for TK20 around the
thought not enough time was beginning-middle of the semester.
spent on the actual portfolio. The This would serve simply to see if
information we did learn in class students know how to operate
has proved to be very valuable and TK20. Many student found TK20
relevant. Dr. Forsythe did a great A very fair instructor. Always difficult and were trying to learn it
job at teaching the foundation of made herself available to her at the last minute
Exams were a bit difficult education. " students. (procrastination).
Professor Forsythe, is a great
caring and genuine teacher. In
every class she taught me
something new, she is very fit for
this job (and above it) and her
experience shines through her
instruction. She is respectful
towards all her students and is a
professional. She is a professor
that wants her students to
succeed. I would definitely go to Very useful; professor Forsythe's
her if I had any question in regards instruction made this course
to professionalism or teaching. knowlegeable.
The midterm exam was a bit
diffcult because the class created a
review sheet and that is what
everyone stuided but most of the In future classes I would suggest
information on the review sheet that the class start working on the
was not the test. I think that portfolio from the begging of the
there are too many short answer semester and turn in at least one
questions for both the midterm standard a week to be review by This instructor was great! I really
and the final exam. the professor. enjoyed taking this class!
The midterm for this class was a
bit difficult, but she went over the I learned so much in this course. Overall I like the course, but I
midterm and even took out the She knows her stuff and makes dislike TK 20. I had difficulty
difficult" questions out. " things clear. She is nice and understanding. uploading artifacts.
I like Professor Coca, however, I
felt that some things could have
been explained more through the
power points that put together. I
The midterm was simple, there liked the fact that she put the
were only 20 questions. However, The course is great and I power points on blackboard. I also
they were all true/false, which can understand why we need the feel like assignments need to be
be rather tricky. I think the test course. It will be extremely more fully explained. There are
could have include other things important to us as aspiring also a lot of assignments that have
like, multiple choice, essay, or teachers. The book was rather not been graded, so its hard to
short answer. difficult to read, though. know what to expect.
I feel like she had a lot to offer us
as future educators but did not
take the time to really
communicate with us about the
material. I do not feel as confident
as I should walking away from this
course. Our papers were not
graded until the last week of the
semester which made it
impossible to be able to have an
I feel like I could have learned idea of what we were making in
more if the teacher would have the course, it also made it
done more explaining of the impossible to fix the things we did
material instead of reading power wrong originally on the
point slides to us. The book for this assignments (for example:
I was not impressed with the type class was terrible and hard to reflections and articles). Dr. Coca is
of midterm she gave. We had a 20 understand, so clarification would very educated and she truly does
question exam over five chapters have been nice, but instead the know a lot about the classroom,
and after studying for 3 days I still power points were almost a direct but it felt as if there was too much
did not do well on the true or false copy of what was in the summary on her plate to put the type of unorganized, repetitive, and no
test. of the chapter in the book. effort needed to teach this course. explanation of assignments.
The course content was unclear
and I felt lost most of the class. While she is a great person, I feel
The class became too routine (i.e. that this class suffered due to her
discussing chapter at the various obiligations. The turn
beginning of class with groups and around time for grades was
then sitting through a powerpoint extremely slow and did not allow
presentation) The powerpoint for students like me to see how we
presentations were helpful were doing mid semester. If
revisiting material, but did not someone was needing to drop the I was never really sure what the
The midterm was 20 T/F question appreciate the reading of it word course, they would not have had purpose of this class was and why I
that I did not feel prepared for. for word. the options to do so. was having to take it.
I think Mrs. Coca has good
intentions but has a lot on her
plate. Grades were not posted in a
I don't feel like we covered the timely manner and there is no
Midterm was not properly information in the syllabus in this clarification of grading or errors on There was too much cooperative
prepared for. class. assignments. learning.
The course was taught mainly
Our midterm covered too many through powerpoints which did
chapters at one time, and did not not cover anything new we hadnt
test our knowledge. It was 20 already read. I was disappointed at Book was not easy to follow or
questions T/F and many students having a teacher read a Very nice person but was not understand and neither was the
fair this was an unfair test. powerpoint to us. prepared to teach the class. syllabus.
She was so slow grading
assignments. By the time the
midterm was administered I has 2
grades on the books, yet had
We had a midterm that we turned in more than that. It would
weren't properly taught for and it This course was to teach us about take her roughly 2 weeks to grade
was over 10-11 chapters without a lesson plans yet we were referred and whenever I would ask for
study guide. Majority of the class to the internet to reference and clarification she would refer me to
failed. learn a particular lesson plan type. a classmate.
I would recommend the instructor
to other students for courses that
involve ESL or Bilingual work. I feel
that is her specialty and passion.
This instructor very knowledgeable
One exam all true/false..fair..but Good content will be used in the and approachable, very It was good structure, would
tricky future encouraging... prefer syllabus to have dates...
Seemed to not be as prepared as
necessary. Never graded/returned
assignments. We have 5
reflections and 5 articles. Usually
you would do one, get feedback,
and then use the feedback on the
remaining assignments. Since we
never received any feedback, we
never knew if we were on the right
track. This semester is over next
week and I grades for 5
assignments, while 9 assignments
Never graded/returned still have not even been looked
assignments at/graded.
the course was very informational The instructor was very helpful the structure was great, no
no comment and I learned a lot. and explained herself well. complaints.
more consistency. we agreed to
leaving 20 minutes earlier and
making it up through extra i did not like having to collaborate
blackboard assignments but the with groups 3-4 times regarding
instructor would keep us until 9:50 each chapter. then, having to hear
or later. on days we had to the power point word for word. it
present there was no time frame was a waste of time. working with
and we had to bring in our lesson a group is nice one time around
i would like less article reviews plans for the following class. next and mentioning the main points
would like reviews that are because they did not apply to the time, the instructor to have a sign on the powerpoint would have
pertinent to the exam content for the class. up sheet sufficed
Does not grade work in a timely
manner
The course content was somewhat
unclear when it came to the
assignments given there was not
enough explanation on what
specifically needed to be done.
the instructor is well prepared for
the class is great i liked the course the subject matter. the structure is appropriate.
Assignments were not all
explained well and the end of the
It took way to long to recieve course was very confusing
grades back for work we had regarding what we needed to do
completed. to complete the semester.
instructor really knows the subject.
would have liked to have feedback
in a more timely manner.
Mrs. Johnson was unprepared
It was really unfair because some I love science, the only thing Im most of the time. She gave some
of us students till recently did not taking from this course are lesson assignments that felt repetitive.
know where we stood in the plans that my peers created and She's a great teacher but I think I would have wanted to learn more
course. The grades were recently the information that was taught she should have taught like her information that would help me
put up two weeks before the last during the last five weeks of the last five weeks from the start of for my content exam but also to
week. semester. the semester. prepare me in the classroom.
The 5E Model was implemented
throughout the semester to teach The instructor could have been a
Fairly structured, good use of us science content, and as an little more prompt with returning
Generalist questions to prepare for example for us and how to teach the grades and coming to class on
the TExES Generalist exam it, which I think was a good idea. time. not very organized
Instructor was 45min. late to each
class. Very unprofessional. When
she taught class you could tell she
didn't really want to be there.
Weeks spent on presentations
with out any instruction from the
teacher. I was very upset to have
had her as a teacher. I felt this
class was a waste of my time. She
didn't return grades in a timely
manner so my average has always
Took too long to receive the been a question. She didn't return
grades from the midterm. emails.
This course was a bit stressful due
to the instructor's lack of returning
grades to students, therefore we The course was changes after
did not know where our grade midterms which was a good thing
stood throughout the entire because in the beginning i felt I
semester wan not learning anything new
The exams that were given were I feel like the teacher was
fair. They were not difficult and sometimes not sure of what she
they did cover what we had We ended up learning more about was doing. She gave us grades very
learned, but she did not give us a science concepts towards the end. late which prevented us from
challenging questions to see what At the beginning we focused a lot knowing were we stand. I don't We did not know what to expect
we really knew. on the 5e model. believe she acted professionally. most of the time.
the instructor is great and knows
the course is good and relates to what is teaching within the the structure of the course is good
this is a great class the subject matter content i enjoyed the class
Examinations were designed to Wonderful instructor who
make you think and dig deeper for designes her assignments so that
your responses. They were hard you discover what your beliefs are
but I learned alot about the and what you can do. I learned
content they exam covered as I more about my abailities in this
researched my answers and by Assignments covered this course course than another other course I
digging deep I came out with and perfectly. We teachers really have ever taken. She is creating
A each time. learned what our abilities are!! quality teachers!!!
Very challenging work, but very
stimulating, I learned a lot from Dr.
Vincent.
The course requires us a load of
This course was very relevant, I felt work, but I think that the work
it really will prepare me for my really prepared us to become
first year in a classroom. Great instructor! better educators.
They require indepth thinking
Dr.Vincent is a great instructor!
She always gets our mind going
and knows what she's talking
about!
I really enjoyed working on the
strategies notebook. I think I Very prompt, flexible, and fair. I
learned a lot from working in that liked that if some students felt we
The quizzes were not that difficult. journal and doing the activities. should take certain assignments
Trying to find sources other than That is something I will definately out of the syllabus or change due
Hoge was somewhat difficult but want to do to help teach social dates, the instructor was willing to
necessary. studies to my students. work with us to avoid overload. Very well structured
Quizzes in this course were
difficult to me in the beginning.
but they made me research and
think critically and by the end I was This course was tough but brought
doing better out the best in me Wonderful instructor
The instructor really challenges us
as learners and teachers. I believe
she is a great teacher, but gives us
lots of assignments. The
assignments of course are of great
benefit to us because it gives us
The tests were a little difficult and the opportunity to show what we The course was structured well,
challenging, but I believe that it know and practice on what we but there was just so much to do. I
gave us the opportunity to reflect I learned a lot about social studies know. I learned a lot from this feel like assignments were
on what we had studies in class. during this course. teacher. crammed together.
good. a lot of studying, but we knew what she was teaching, great she is great willing to stay and the course is good. good syllabus.
learned a lot. instructor. work with you if any questions good structure.
Very fair and explains when you Great instructor! Always asking if
are incorrect. Always opens the their are any questions. Clearly
floor for questions or wants to make sure we
misunderstandings. understanding the concepts!!!
everything we learned was
something that I really benefited
me. I have a middle school child
Exams were challenging but very that REALLY benefited from the Wonderful, made everything clear
fair. techniques I learned! for me to understand.
I really enjoyed this course, it
related a lot of its content to our
requirements as teachers and it Ms. Johnson provided us with an
prepared us for our content excellent environment, it was very
exams. welcoming.
very relevant, incorporated useful very well organized and prompt
Fair, offers study guides and strategies to use in teaching math, with grading, flexible with
reviews over test content including using manipulatives assignments well structured
Great instructor! She was very
understanding about the fact that
this was a very busy semester for
us and was willing to accept work
late (within reason). Also did a
great job of explaining the course
material.
Very fair, no surprises, knew
exactly what to expect very relevant to my job
I have never been good at math,
but this instructor was great at
explaining a tough subject
The instructor was fantastic. She The course structure was good.
communicated with us well and We went through the chapters in
The examination were fair. The The course helped me a lot in was always available in case we order and we always knew what to
exams included al we had learned using strategies to teach students had a question or any expect each time we met because
in the lectures. specific math concepts. misunderstandings. the teacher followed the syllabus.
Fair Engaging SHE WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! fair
This course is very relevant in She's a very sweet intellectual
teaching. person.
I really like my teacher, she seems
like a good person, The only
problem that I had is that all the
topics were presemted by us
students. The reason we took this
class is to actually learn about the
different topics so us presenting
the topics did not benefit me a bit
since we are not expert in the
material, It would have been
helpful if she would have
introduced the different topics and
maybe done the presentations. I
know that many of our instructors
have several jobs but in reality we
took this classes because we want
to learn. At this point it is not
about if we get a good grade more
than anythhing has to do with
acquiring the knowledge so we can
aplly it in the classroom and I feel I
did not get that.
didn't like that chapters were
divided up and students taught the
class. I prefer to hear/listen to
professors teach a course so that i
know what THEY think is
important or critical information
that i need to know. This class
should have just been offered
online.
I would reccommend this
instructor to anyone. She is great...
besides all the course content I
loved all the real life tips she gave
us(as future teachers) throughout
the whole semester. She was very
nice and genuinely seemed to care
about us and our future career.
For this course we had three
textbooks!!!! That's ridiculous
considering I was enrolled in three I love love love this instructor. She
other classes and had to purchase was such a big help and
textbooks for those classes, too. I inspirational this semester. She
would recommend that the gave the class so much insight on
subject matter be re-evaluated to being a first year teacher and
condense the number of what's important to teach your
textbooks. students in regards to literacy.
SHe gives very good information
that will help us in our career.
I think I would have liked this class
more if it had been 3 hours on one
night instead of two nights. We
took a lot of time hearing/giving
presentations and not a lot of time
on course content. The instructor
always invited questions, but I
don't feel like we covered the
material as a whole.
This course I believe has the right
amount of assignments and
projects. At no point in the
transition of this course did I feel
overwhelmed or exhausted. I think
the assignments are relevant and Mrs. Gillespie is wonderful. She is
tie in well with the subject matter. very nice and loves all of her
I would suggest to do away with students. I was always excited to
the online discussion because I did come to class because I knew I was
not learn a thing from them. In going to learn something new. She
The test for this class were right on fact I always saw them as a chore makes this class feel very
target with the course. I always because I was not interested in welcoming and easy to tackle. She Again this course has the right
felt like I was fully prepared for the doing them. I have talked to other can be a bit disorganized but that's balance of assignments and
tests. I think they were fair and students in the class and this was just a small downside to her projects just change the online
challenging enough to inspire me the number one complain of this teaching organization. Overall she discussion because they are not
enough to study for them. course. is a great instructor! beneficial to the course.
This professor is awesome. She
went above her duties as a
professor and taught us what to
look for when we interview for
The exams were fair and related to The subject matter was related to future teaching positions and what
the content. the course. to do and not to do.
she is patient, she doesnt mind go
over something over and over.
I believe the grading system This course is helpful because it
utilized by this instructor is fear, The course content is related to taught me things relevant to my
and at the same time challenges the subject and is clearly This instructor knows her subject future teaching career, and how to
the students to learn in an presented so that all students can really well and cares about her help children become good
effective manner. learn. students. readers and writers.
relevant but need more clear
instruction. Teach and I want to learn more...cover
demonstrate before assign something that will help me with
fair homework she is helpful and professional my test.
Great professor!
fair great awesome appropriate
Such a great and organized
instructor. I wish all my instructors
were as prepared and organized at
Dr. Rodriguez.
I enjoyed this course; it dealt with Dr. Rodriguez demonstrates that
hands on activities with students The content of this course will she wants you to learn the
and I learned very useful serve me well when I start material to become a successful The structure was pretty much
information. teaching. teacher. easy to read and organized.
Course had a lot of work/
There is a focus on authentic handouts, but instructor's
assessment that is consistent with organizational skills were
the course materials and activities; Enjoyed content. Really honed my immensely helpful in making the
this works well and really displays lesson planning/ implementing Organized, insightful, flexible. course manageable and its content
what we've learned. skills. Would recommend. accessible.
Very good instructor. I will take her
again if she is teaching any other
classes that I may need.
fairness
This class understandably requires
you to do a lot of reading, and you Dr. Rodriguez is a great instructor. I have learned a lot from this
have to work with a student out This course is relevant, and very I really enjoyed her lectures. She is course and I believe the lessons I
side of class. Overall, I would say useful for my degree. I have very helpful and explains things have learned will come in hand
that this class is fair. It is not easy, learned many useful skills that I clearly. She makes herself when I am out there teaching in a
but it is not too difficult either. will take with me to my field. available if we need any help. classroom.
I think the material and
assignments taught in class are
very relevant to the course.
Exam were clear. clear, and in order. good the structure was good.
Great instructor who explains
expectations very clearly!
Instructor was very clear with
expectations and she was always
available if we need help. She is a
great instructor and I would
Learned so much in this course. recommend her to anyone.
Dr. Rodriguez is a great instructor
who made the content easy to
This course covered content that is understand for all. She took the
related to my content exam as time to make her self available if
well as preparing me for my we needed further comprehension
educational degree. on an assignment.
Very relevant for the course.
Choice Words is a good book for
Fairly easy this course as well. well structured
Loved the structure of this course!
Giving us a chance to present the
information in the chapters not
only gave us a chance to take over
the class, it also gave us a chance
to learn a lot of great strategies to
use in the classroom.
Dr. Rodriguez is very passionate
about the work she does and this
shows through when she is
teaching.
The exams were fair. They were The instructor was very
helpful because they prepared us communicative. I never had any
for our education exams. problems with her.
I think that the final exam was not
so hard.
A bit disorganized.
no recommended for friends.
She only covered 40 percent of the course must taught by other
class, chapters in the book were instructor Too much hw and
not cover by instructor. no project were unclear and no
not pertain to lecture or class. no presentation or no ideas what grading scale. Where is my work I want to learn everything about
review prepared for class. were taught by the instructor. and what is my grade? this course/
Deadlines not clearly set deadlines -
would have made things clearer to
have a syllabus with assignment
due dates.
Great Instructor
The class has a lot of materials to
My teacher is really kind and cover. I felt really interested in
helpful. She is fair on grading as these selections, they brought a
well. Besides, I learned about very deep and profound thought.
grammar and writing skills through It makes me feel more certain that
I like this course her feedback i will be a teacher
The instructor was very supportive
The course content was very and helpful; instructions for the
interesting. Several things that the assginments were well explained.
student could learned to apply The instructor was alwasy well The course structure was good. It
them in his/her own classroom to organized, and their teaching is a challengable course, but if the
establish a positive environment to methods were effective on student works hard he/she learns
improve students' learning. students. a lot from it.
The subject matter is interesting
and challenges my thinking.
I like my teacher. she's helpful,
nice and she loves to do new stuff.
Her tests come in different styles The course is fun and has a lot of
and we never know how it gonna assignments ex. essays. Thanks to
there is a lot things to do in this be, which is very risky" and that I'm motivated to study more,
I like this class course, but they arefun! interesting" and i learn more.
Very challenging.I learned a lot.
The fact that some of the quizzes
cover material that was not
explained in class was a bit
frustrating.
This class is quiet difficult while
doing observations because the
schedule time for the class is in the
morning.
His exams are fair; however the
critical thinking level required is This professor has a very good This course is a very tough course
high. Too much information to knowledge on the subject he is because of the hours of early field
study, and the questions to be teaching. It is the kind of professor experience that have to be
answer are confusing sometimes. that will make you work hard, but completed. It is very difficult to
Exams are kind of long for the time you will learn from what you're complete these hours and attend
that is given to finish them. doing. to the class at the same time.
The exams are too long for
example when writing a lesson
plan real teachers have all day to
complete to make sure everything
that is needed is written and in an Would like to have more
hour test I didn't have enough technology taught that will be
time. used in the career field.
The teacher gives a great number
of assignments and expects his
students to have time to finish
them in addition to the 55
observations hours and 10 essays
we have to turn in for the filed
experience. The instructor in this
The teacher implements many class is very respectful and
mathematical concepts that are organized. The one thing that I
not part of the course description. don't agree with is that when he's
I believe he should focus more giving a lesson he doesn't let
His exams are very lengthy.Also time on the education content students take notes. He tells them
sometimes he tells us something is than the math. I also believe the to pay attention. Not all students The class structure is very
going to be on the exams and he instructor should make more learn the same, some students and challenging because there's many
doesn't put it in there. Also emphasis on the field experience listen and write at the same time. assignments expected to be
believe he shouldn't put math assignment. In my opinion the As an education instructor he finished. I think the teacher should
problems on education exams class's main goal is to make should know that everyone has assign less essays and make only a
because it's not part of the content observations at the schools and different learning styles and he few significant projects based on
course. reflect in what we learn. should respect them. our observations and reflections.
Examinations were fair, a little
long for class period though! Material was very helpful Great teacher!
fair
Dr. Anderson is very
knowledgeable and makes
Exams cover material presented in learning the required materials
class and power points. Good book and good expirences. interesting. Enjoyable
I was dissatisfied with the
assessments we had to do in this
class. These assessments are
outdated and not widely used.
There was extreme frustration that
the library and computer lab were
not informed about the
procedures for scoring these
assessments. Fortunately, the
instructor was understanding, but I
wasted many hours on things that
should have only taken me a few
minutes, had the people in the She was wonderful. I would
library and computer lab been recommend her, but not the
trained. content. Boo.
Went over the course text twenty
percent of the time. Did not
explain how the reports were
suppose to be until after she
graded them. Did not go over any
of the state assessemnts that we
had to give. This course could of
been online because she didn't
expain in the beginning how she
wanted the assignments.
This instructor was very lively and
knowledgeable. She took time to
explain the content and put it
plainly versus professional jargon.
she is knowledgeable of
test are bit difficult, but with assessment, but lack in how to use
better lecture or review that could for education purpose only in
of been easier. psychology.
this examinations are at a level I The content of this course is The instructor is very nice to work The structure of the course is well
can understand. relevant to my degree. with. organized.
Dr. Seabrooks-Blackmore is an
amazing professor! She's
incredibly knowledgable about the
subject, I learned so much from
her class!
She is very knowledgeable about I like the meeting times of once a
The examinations a little hard the subject matter in this course. month.
this course provides many
opportunities to apply what is in I loved the way the class is
the book to what is happening in I wish she would explain projects scheduled on the Fridays and
fair and stimulating the schools more clearly Saturdays
Fair, Learned many things in this Great teacher. Learned a wealth
class I liked the course. of information. Great structure and organization.
The content was well thought out
to benefit each and every student.
It encouraged students to focus on
Though I do not like exams the their continued improvement, not I like how at the end we only had
examinations create a perverse just on their grade on any one test to do a presentation. The teacher
incentive to excel in the parallel or assignment. It helped students She encouraged the students to worked to create memorable
highly a skill rarely if ever evaluate their progress by think for themselves. Even though experiences that will stay with the
important in real life. I find we encouraging them to critique their we wanted to give up she pushed students and fuel their continued
learned more in a shorter period own work, analyze their strengths, us on. I think she was very nice learning like a good source of
of time on our projects. and work on their weaknesses. and she knew her material. protein.
This class was definetely intense,
but reasonable and very gratifying
in the end. It was a huge
challenge, but the instructor was
there the whole way to make sure
that we knew what we were doing
and understood where we were
going with the key assignment for
the class.
Extemely knowledgable and great
Adequately covers the material. Very good course, very informative teacher! The course has a nice flow.
We were not given specific
content guidelines to follow which
made it difficult to study.
We had a major project that was
to be composed throughout the
course. It was cumbersome
because it's very detailed and
requires a ton of research. There
were a lot of paraprofessionals in
the course and they noted that the
subject matter of the course is not
applicable in the modern
Exams are very thought provoking classroom. Therefore the course
and plenty of application. holds no relavance.
fair but challenging
I like her. She is fun and I felt very
It's very appropriate for special comfortable talking with her. I It was a little intimidating to begin
I like the exams they are education. We need to have was at ease and myself in her with but it was ok once I
challenging yet fair. strategies for behaviors. class. understood what was expected
I felt the blogs were unclear
sometimes and I didn't know what
I felt well prepared for the exams she wanted. My group also felt the
from her lectures and the same and when we asked about it
handouts were helpful. the same thing was said.
We were asked to complete a blog
project for this class and it turned
out to be a really neat assignment.
We all discovered great new
resources that will be useful to us
as future teachers and project
itself ended up being fun because
it was such a different way of Dr. Seabrooks-Blackmore really
doing things. I really applaud our knows her stuff, she added so
professor for thinking out of the much valuable content to this
box on this one! course!
I believe there were so many
assignments, it was difficult to stay
caught up with the big
assignments. I believe some of the
assignments were not pertinent to I really liked how she was always
the topic. Felt like there was a lot available to talk. She always had a
of busy work. smile on her face.
Only provided specific guidelines
on rubric, not on sheet that gives
instructions on assignment. Having
to look on two separate sheet's to
find what I need to include in my
projects.
COntent very extened but vital to Very organized and well planned
difficult but keeps me on my toes. know She is very knowledgable by instructor.
Although I do not think her exams
are unfair, I think the way she
grades the exams are unfair. She
counts off on every little thing,
even if it is one punctuation error Great instructor! Very
or one misspelled word. I think understanding and is always
that is a little harsh. willing to help if needed.
The instructor is wonderful,
Course content is very needed and understanding,helpful, well
Very easy if you read will be used in your career rounded person Well needed
The instructor did an excellent job
in guiding the students through
the course giving each student
high praise on the great job they
The difficulty of this course is what did while at the same time giving
is expected of a college level The content of this course is helpful advice on which areas they
English course. perfect. could improve upon. The course structure is pefect.
I really like the instructor. I think
everything when went well this
i enjoy everything n/a semster n/a
Dr. Warrington made writing for
me very easy. When I first came
into this class I had mixed feelings
Everything was great she was fair about writing in general, but now I
to everyone and didn't show It was all relevant in my eyes and can say that I'm very comfortable
favorites. I'm thankful for taking this class. to write any kind of paper now.
She is very interesting and
I found the exams to be difficult The content is necessary and cheerful. Have great energy that
yet a learning experience. helped me a lot in my writing. keep the class alive. Not sure how to respond.
Great Great Great Great
Very good instructor, easy to
follow along with her schedule,
gives a good amount of time for
The level of difficulty on the The course content from the book assignments and does not
writing assignments was was always interesting and the overload with busy work and
challenging but yet simple if we topics for our papers were also fun actually gives assignments that
just put forth effort. and challenging to write on. help us. Good
The instructor was great, she did a
great job of relating to the
The content was always diverse students and making things easy
and interesting, far different than for everyone by explaining things The course structure was fun and I
what I am use to in a English Class well and managing to keep the believe that we all enjoyed the
Exams were simple and easy. and I enjoyed it very much. entire class interested. topics that were given.
She is a great professor and she
teaches the material well.
Dr. Warrington is awesome! She
makes everything make sense
even when she doesn't quite have
The class is easy and helps make a grasp on it she still breaks it
your writing better as you go down until you fully understand it.
throughout the course. The course She makes assignments that will
We only had a few exams and the is extremely relevant since we stretch our creativity and make us
ones that we did have were easy if have assignments that deal with stronger as writers and students all
you read and understood the things that are happening now and together. We learn to work as a The structure is good and the
material. But most everything we not 20 years ago. We wrote on group. Everyone in our class we all classroom we are in fits the class.
did in the class was for our papers things that were relevant to us as worked as a team to achieve We need computers for certain
we were going to write or were students. Things that we knew exactly what we needed to get research and for some of our
writing at the time. about and were interested in. through the class. assignments.
I think curbing the number of
readings in the first week of class
would allow the the students to
work on the things related to an
essay. Since we had too many
readings, it felt like we discussed
more about the readings but had
less time talking about the
important things about the essay
like transition statements, support
and organization of paragraphs
etc. Professor could have also
used a formal paper of many great
writers to point out the important
things and structure of an essay.
Need to spend time about the
technical matter of essay writing
more than discussing great works
of writers. Overall, the professor is
great. She tried to give students
tons and tons of feedback on the
essays after she graded which
helps students a lot. She actively
encourages stdents towards
critical thinking and builds
curiousity in us to write essays.
Her explnation in class is also great
but need to hear more of it,
specifically on organization of
paragraphs, how to use support,
transition statements, in-cite
referencing, MLA citation and so
Fair enough! forth.
I don't think that she has any
respect for her students (especially
the ones that she does not like,
she does have her teachers pets)
and everything that they do, she
likes and wants all of the other
students to be just like them. She
has told in front of the whole class
that I needed to drop this class,
that I had not done some of my
posts, and I think that is just
disrespectful. She could have
pulled in the hall and talked to me
instead of telling the whole class.
We have a research paper to do
and she said we could write it on
any topic and the topic I chose, she
told me that she thought that I
should change it because some of
the other students were very
interesting and she did not think
that it would be interesting at all.
So when I sent her an email stating
I would change it to
I think that Dr. King needs to work discrimination, she told me that
for a newspaper or something like my first topic was fine. I WOULD
that. She is in a position to help us NOT IN A MILLION YEARS
learn how to write not to criticize RECOMMEND THIS INSTRUCTOR
us on what we have written. She is TO A FUTURE STUDENT IF MY LIFE
too hard on her students and DEPENDED ON IT, THEY DESERVE
makes it VERY DIFFICULT to PASS A PROFESSOR WHO WILL RESPECT
the class. The way that she talks, I THEM AND TREAT EACH AND
sometimes do not even know EVERY STUDENT AS A WHOLE AND
what she is saying. I think that she NOT COMPARE THEM TO
there were no exams in this class is talking in a foreign language. EVERYONE ELSE.
It was english to me. Plain and
simple it was good She is passionate about her stuff it's pretty good
This instructor did not explain her The course was not structured
expectations well. I also feel that well. The processor spent too
for a freshman level course the much time reading to the class as
There were no examinations in this expectations were too high. The opposed to giving practical
course. We were graded on essay Course content was relevant and professor did not connect well examples of what she wanted or
writing. appropriate. with the class. what would be appropriate.
BAD INSTRUCTOR!!!!!!!!!!!! No
patience, she yelled at us and we
are all adults and should be
Poor very difficult. She gave exams treated like so. She was very
they were way beyond the depth unhelpful on any questions I had
we discuss the topics in class. She about any assignments. she did
had way to much information to Subject matter was pretty not teach things that were on the
be tested over in a small amount interesting but the instructor test. She is one instructor i would
of time. Very UNFAIR!!!!! made it very hard to understand. not ever take again!!!!!!!!! Fair
Where do I start? The way Dr. King
teaches this course is really
confusing. Everything we do in
class is discussion, but not
discussion to what pertains to
Exams are extremely difficult. The what we are going to be tested
exam has questions over things over. She just wants our opinions
that are NEVER discussed in class. on random thing in the stories we
We will have vocab words on the were suppose to read. There are
test that have not been spoken about 30 pages or more to read
once by our instructor. Part 1 of between every class. The only way
the Exam is about 150 questions anyone can keep up in this class is
(multiple choice and fill in the to not have any other classes
blank) then part 2 is an essay during the semester. I asked her if
portion in which she wants about we can learn things that we are This instructor is out of touch with
2 pages. Both parts must be going to be tested over and she students. Horrible teacher.
completed in an hour and a half. said, That is not what we talk Actually she doesn't teach, she just
There are only 2 test, and the first about in class, you have to do that stands up in front of the class and
test is not until after the drop date, on your own." How am I suppose rambles, about NOTHING! She acts
so if u fail the first test you are to know what we are going to be like everyone in the class is a
basically screwed. The study tested over and prepared for a 2 English major, wake up call, no
sheets for the exams are no help test that account for 45% of our one in the class is an English
for the test and is nothing but total grade? It does not make any major! Grades way to harshly. Test
busy" work. As far as the essay sense. She stands in front of the way too hard for a required
portions go, she grades way to class and rambles on about course. She takes pleasure in
hard for this level of course. She nothing. her teaching style is out giving bad grades. Class work and
grades as if everyone in the class is of touch with the student. When I quizzes do not help with the test
about to receive their MBA or tried to comment on her teaching or papers. 2 test and 2 papers
something. She will harshly grade style she told me this is how she make up 80% of your final grade?
our papers but will not tell us what has done it for years and is not Something is wrong here. She
she wants. There are only 2 test going to change. This tells me that doesn't tell you what she wants in
and 2 papers, and they account for she does not care for the student your 5 page essays, we are not
80% of our total grade. I do not but just a paycheck. When a mind readers.She has us read
understand how someone can not teacher refuses to change her pages and pages of material but
tell me what she is looking for in a teaching style to help a student the things we discuss in class are Do not understand why this is
paper, but tell me my paper is not she is not there to help in any maybe over 1 topic, and it is the required. I have learned nothing
good?" means. I would not recommend topic of her choice. from this class.
Exam was not over given material,
only 25% of test was covered in Great instructor, but compares this
calss the rest was not, it was a big institution to her previous ones,
surprise and a lot of material to be and does not consider this is a
covered in one test with only 4 Content is good, but would have commuter school, and most
days to fill out a 6 page review like a heads up on what was going students work and study at the
with over 70 terms to be on the test same time
Not truly understanding of
students personal live and time
away from school. Gives extreme
Way out of hand...makes it almost amounts of reading and gave test
impossible to complete in the time and quiz th last day of class before
given. 104 difficult questions(some exam. Has no sympathy for those
not multiple choice) and a 2 page who ask for some leadway and all
essay in an hour and 20 minutes is in all hurts more than helps
almost impossible! students and their grades...
This course was unnecessarily
difficult. The professor stated she
did not want to teach to the exam.
Which is ok as long as the
expectations of what knowledge is
necessary is clearly is
communicated. This was not done.
The 7 page review for exam 1 was
given 4 days before the exam and
it was all new info that had not Not in touch with her demands on
been discussed in class at all. On students time. Did not clearly
top of all this new material we communicate expectations to
were still required to write an create a positive learning
essay and read what averaged to environment. Lectures were about
be about 60-75 pages for each nothing, a complete waste of time.
class. The test was 7 pages long, Many students felt they would be
the length alone was discouraging better suited to spend the time in
to the point where some students the library. Gave essay questions None existant. The only structure
were experiencing panic attacks. I The scope of the course was that were not discussed at all and we had was the syllabus which the
felt overwhelmed by the time outrageous. There was entirely too then picked apart our answers as if professor stuck to making only one
constraints of the exam as it also much to cover in such a short she had discussed it with us or as if exception because we ran out of
included an essay. period of time. we could read her mind. time.
THIS IS AN ELECTIVE, yet it's being
taught like it is an UPPER LEVEL
COURSE! I am in FEAR OF FAILING
AND NOT GRADUATING IN DEC
2010, DUE TO THIS CLASS!!!!!!!
The Exam is one of the MOST
difficult exams I have EVER TAKEN
IN MY ENTIRE LIFE! I think it makes
NO SENSE AT ALL for an ELECTIVE
CLASS to be made into some kind Same comments as above... the
of HARVARD CLASS! This is NOT class is simply an ELECTIVE! I pass
my field of study... I am NOT a all my classes with flying colors, I think that it is RIDICULOUS that
LITERARY MAJOR! I like the yet I am FAILING AN ELECTIVE there is this absenteeism" rule..
teacher, but the class was made CLASS.. Makes NO sense AT ALL! I HELLO... WE ARE IN COLLEGE, NOT
WAY to difficult! am VERY UPSET ABOUT THIS!!!! She talks A LOT, but I like her. HIGH SCHOOL!"
Extremely fair. Dr. King prepared
us adequately, tested us on
material covered during the
semester, gave a thorough
method of review that if
completed would ensure we knew
what we would be tested on
generally. The exam was One of the most engaging
challenging, but very fair. professors I've ever had.
Absolutely terrible class structure.
Claims that the class is not lecture
based but study discussion based. I
didn't pay nearly a thousand
dollars for the class to hear other
classmates spew out absurdities
during our discussions which had
minimal class participation. Out of
twenty students only about three
would speak up and the remainder
would stay quiet during our
discussions. Class felt like a waste
of time and I dreaded attending.
The worse part was that while
class time was squandered on
irrelevant discussions, the class
Extremely difficult and absurd. The stories are based on World discussions did not at all reflect
Gave us the study guide for the Literature beginnings so it included any of the tests. Of all my years in
exam only a weekend before the such tales as Gilgamesh, Lysistrata, Instructor is knowledgeable and college this was the least helpful
test. Definitely had to cram for it. Medea, Antigone, to name a few. kind. class to me.
I don't think that she understands
that we are non-traditional
students who has a life outside of
college. The exams and quizzes are
graded harshly. She never post
grades on ecampus so we can
follow our progress. She is
unwilling to understand different
situation that arises. I am a person
who has to be involve in the
learning process. Lecturing and not
doing any work just doesn't cut it She comes to class unpresentable.
for me. I feel like I will fail the She bites her nails while lecturing The structure for this course is not
class. in class. good at all.
This course is not difficult, it is The course content is very The instructer is very good at her
simply alot of reading that needs interesting, and i have personally lectures and the way she discusses
to be done and that can often be enjoyed the readings for this class. the reading with the class. I enjoy The course structure is somewhat
hard especially of people dont Very much relevant to the subject listening to her, she is definitely bad, there are so many readings to
have the time to read. World Literature"." not boring! be done and so little time.
We took a quiz just about
everyday, I thought that was
ridiculous, but I never complained,
because I stayed on top of my
I actaully had no problem with reading. I'm not sure how Prof.
Prof. King, until I realized the type King grades, but she's one of those
of instructor she was. I can recall teachers that marks up the whole
her saying in so many words that page. You can never understand
Even though we read the story, it's her writing nor exactly what she's
our responsibility to do more committing on,because there is
research or to expand our minds notes and scribble scrabble
further into the aurthor and the everywhere. It's like, no matter
reading." No one was going to do how hard you try to do good on an
extra research outside of class, assignment, Prof.King always finds
when we were assigned 40+ pages a way to let you know that you
to read a night. We were didn't do well at all. When we are
swamped in trying to finish the in class, she's in her own world.
reading. There wasn't time for She wants us to be as dedicated to
these exams were RIDICULOUS! I anything else! I think she makes World Literature as she is, and
honestly can say that I never the class sound good, but it's that's impossible, becuase no one
expected the exams to be this almost as though the actuall was majoring in English in our
difficult. The quizzes were fine, but reading of the stories were a class. It was either a requirement
the exams were about things we waste! Because or exams were or an elective that many people
did not even cover in the readings. based on vocabulary and intro's to thought they would take and
Our midterm was so long, that We the stories. Where were the would pass with an A. She made
had to schedule another day just questions about the story? Prof. that impossible. She didn't even
to take the other part of it! No one King even went around the class make our study guides easy to
finished on time! Out of the and pointed out people who she follow. That was a test! We had
smartest of the kids, many of the thought participated and I suppose three huge and thick books for
students failed that mid term would pass, and made everyone that class, and our study guides
exam. If many of us barley passed else feel as though they weren't never included a page number or
the final exam, it was because we The course content was fine. In a doing enough. That made me the number of the book that the
kind of knew what to expect. The class like this, you would think that extremely angry because I thought story or published work was in.
sections were to long and based all you had to do was keep up that was very unprofessional. She She expected us to mysteriously
more off of the intro or with the reading and you would could have contacted those find 10 pages (study guide) in
bibliographies of the authors pass, but unfortunately that wasn't students through email and told three books with no refrence as to
rather the story themselves! the case! them about their progress." where it would be. I guess she
The objective portion of the
midterm was extremely difficult
because of the amount of
information on the test and review The course content is a lot of
and I didn't know what to expect. information and covers a vast
However, it was fair because there amount of time. Overall, it shows
was also an additional essay and a how things were/are in different Engaging and pushes you to do
take home paper to balance it out. parts of the world. your best. It was fine.
The instructor is very disrespectful
to students in class. She does not
explain the assignments well and
changes the assignments multiple
times. When you ask for help on
assignments she is not very helpful
and many times overlooked the
questions instead of answering
them. It was asked several times
but still no response. She has no
understanding of the graduate
level student and the
I think the examinations were fair responsibilities that many hold
but were challenging. outside of school.
Very nice, had high expectations
for students despite their inability
Very difficult but fair. Difficult to grasp the concepts.
fair; however, I had to do allot of
studying. Maybe presented in a
better format would have offered Not that great, but the material
fair more clarity fair. Down to earth was do-able.
Did not explain things well. I liked
her as a person, but not a statistics
professor. It is obvious she knows
what she is talking about, but I did
not feel she explained things well.
She also made me uncomfortable
The book and projects assigned in asking questions in class because
class were more helpful than the she was sarcastic to the point of
instructor. I loved the book sometimes disrespectful. I did not
because it explained difficult experience negative energy or
material in a way I could comments directed towards me,
Take home exam that made me understand. The projects in class but the way she talked and treated
learn the material. The exam helped me critically think and some other students and
accurately and fairly tested my apply the concepts I learned from conducted her class I feel was
abilities in statistics. weekly readings. inappropriate.
Instructor identifies relationships
between and among topics and
Course is very pratical to my career what is going on in the real world
Exam are very in depth but fair and is information that everyone and we dicuss alot of scenarios The course structure is very good it
with adequate time and number of should be using in their day to day that are in the news(Current allows you to learn and apply
questions life. Affairs). course material to your life.
Faire Great One of the best instructor in UNT. Great
He explained things in such a way I think the way he structures the
that it was easy to understand. If course is fantastic. He has done a
he explained it in one way that I great job of explaining things in a
understood and another student relative sense to everyone in the
didn't he'd back up and slow down class. My only recomplaint lies
This is a course where his and try a different approach to with the requirement of
explinations of how to do the work explaining how to work out the purchasing an expensive book that
was substantially better than all problems so that each student wasn't worth a 10th of its price for
The material as a whole is a explinations given in the book. understood the concepts. He this course. The professor did
difficult one to understand. The The book was basically good for went above and beyond to make such an amazing job that I never
daily quizes were a huge help thinking of alternative numbers to sure all of his students had a good felt like I had to teach myself the
towards preparing for the use in problems, but other than grasp of the materials before he material from the book that is
examinations. that was a waste of money. moved on to the next topic. complex and hard to understand.
wonderful instructor great
speaking skills, he is always
difficult but fair managable and interesting prepared. managable
Professor Hallett is a great
instructor. I went into this class
thinking it was going to be the
most difficult one I would be
taking this semester but the
instructor explained the material
well, was extemporaneous, and is
very knowledgeable on the subject
matter. I would like to take him on
other finance related courses for
my degree.
This instructor is very
knowledgable and he will help you
The examinations are fair This course is interesting and very if needed to understand this class The course structure is relevant for
especially since the come from his realistic to what is happening or material so you can do well on what is happening in our business
lectures in class. today. mid terms. world today.
He does a good job in telling the
material but sometimes he loses
me in his outlines going ahead of
one subject then coming back to
another then jumping on to
another. Also, its not really an
The difficulty of this course is what important thing but sometimes
is expeced of a college level history the tone of his voice doesn't sound
course. The course content is perfect. enthusiastic. The course structure is perfect.
Great Great Great Great
It is a fair class. This is the BEST
history teacher I have come across I really do not take interest in
and the most TRUTHFUL teaching History, but it was not so bad with
thus far. this teacher. He is nice and fair. I am neutral.
Mr.Babcock is a pretty awesome
teacher, he brings a progressive,
The course material came from interractive approach to teaching. I
The examinations are fairly the book as well as the instructor's believe that he is a valuable pretty great ^__^, fast paced, alot
moderate. knowledge on the material. teacher at UNT-D. of work.
i think that when you give us our what is the purpose of buying the
test that its unfair to deman so book if the information its going to
much of us. the vocabulary should be on the test. you told us that
be multiple choice. what you say will be on the test.
The difficulty goes in after half of
the semester but all we can do is
pay attention and it will work out The course is very interesting to He is a very knowledgeable person
in the end. Also the fairness is me because of the different wars and he makes it clear what we It is extremely interesting in some
really well. and the truth about history. have to focus in. points.
I believe that with effort this class
exams were thorough and helped is very efficient and I believe that
the student to be able to identify the material learned here is very very respectful and thorough and
and memorize keys terms. Exams relevant to daily life and the has his students best interests in
are not difficult but challenging. learned material will be helpful mind very easy to follow
Fair Great Great great
He is a good teacher, very fair and
Fair and good class helpful.
The instructor was okay. I wasn't
The difficulty level in this course is displeased but not overly pleased
a little more extreme than any either. He presented the material
other history classes I've taken to the best of his knowledge but
simply because all of these exams he did inform us that this wasn't a
are straight memorization. This topic he specializes in so as far as
being said, he was fair with what elaboration, he elaborated very
he expected of us and we knew The course content gave the minimally. I'm sure he would be a
what to study for the tests. He students a thorough good professor in something he
made that very clear. Although, I understanding of what the history has studied in depth. He simply The course was organized
think it's common knowledge that course was supposed to present. It lectured, only a few film clips aside although we fell behind on
information students strictly was presented in a manner that from that was shown which made schedule. We still knew what to
memorize is soon forgotten. was understandable. the course monotonous. expect and when to expect it.
Amazing and nothing short of the
The course content was great, it's word. He knows his stuff and
The course is what you would rather obvious he researchs the allows students to weight in their
expect from a history class while topics in advance before class opinions on events in history then
keeping you on your toes disccussions. further explains It is structured very well
The course content is very relevant The instructer is very informative The course structure is perfect, all
The class over all is fairly easy. If to the course. The things we study and teaches the class clearly. He of the learning material is divided
you do all of your work and study, is very informational. Definitely seems very knowledgeable about into sections and taught evenly
you can most definitely get an A. history! the subject. throughout the semester.
course content is relevant to a
student who is perusing a degree instructor is highly knowledgeable the tests (quizzes) were not
were not clearly understood in human services. of subject matter. explained beforehand
I like the class structure but the
The exams was difficulty and tests. subject was o.k. She was o.k. It was not thorough.
I think the amount of work needs
I think it was difficult because the to be tone down for the class to
work was to much to do for the get full participation from
class. btu I enjoyed it. Very clear and to the point students. n/a
The instructor does not practice
what she preaches. She is behind
on her grading, although I know
that most professors are. I had
asked her about a particular
assignment and she responded
that if she did received it, she will
grade it, which I found rude
because how can I control what
malfunctions a computer has for
the assignment to not have
possibly been submitted? This
course requires public speaking,
although it was brief, and as a
courtesy, the majority of the class
is supposed to make decent
enough claps. However, there was
one incident in which I presented The course structure is not well
an event and no one clapped. She organized, and as I have
The relevance of this course is did not say anything at all, which I mentioned before, it involved
important for those who aspire to found disrespectful because for assignments designed by another
be human service professionals. other similar situations, she professor, which makes it all the
The subject matter is therefore, expressed her disappointment of more difficult because at times it
I think that the examinations are informative and related to lack of claps from the audience. did not pertain to what we discuss
for the most difficult. The only fair practical applications. However, it Therefore, this instructor has not in class. I would wish that she
aspect was when it pertain to does not really relate to the course created a respectful atmosphere posts the power point slides she
some of my assignments and content, such as assignments, for her students, which is a pity used in class, but that is not done,
when the professor allowed the especially some assignments were since some of the students are our then I wish she would at least
class to use notes, which was not designed by another professor, future human service attempt to finish discussing the
very helpful. and not my own. professionals. power point slides.
Instructor explained parts of things
once, on the first day of class, and
then never offered any other
explanation. When asked for help
she would always say check your
sylabus I've already explained that.
The class would be much better if
she would just take a few minutes
to make sure we were all on the
same page about instructions, due
dates and assignments. Not just
cover them on the first day and
then refuse to talk about it ever
again.
I did not like the fact that we did
not get review sheets. The clase I did not like that our professor did
usually covered a whole lot of not use power point files as much
information to try to figure out I feel that the course content She was an enthusiastic professor, in her lecture. Power points really
what was going to be in the covered most of the infomation in knoledgeable about the subjects. I do help when it comes to taking
exams. the course books. liked her. notes.
The examinations were difficult for The instructor did a great job
me because I was not clear on organizing this course. The subject
exactly what to study. However, it matter was highly relevant to my
could just be my way of field of study. The assignments The instructor is passionate about
externalizing information because I seemed teadious but I can now what she does and did an excellent The course structure was well
am not very efficient with multiple reflect back and see that they job at teaching and structuring the thought out. The guest speakers
choice tests. were well worth it. course. were very enlightening.
We covered alot of content
pertaining to human services and
the issues that arise. What I liked
most is Dr. Lacy took the time to
They were fair and include material that was not in She is very passionate about the It was structed well with alot of
comprehensive. the textbook. subject. work.
Although I do not like tests, maybe
adding a few more would increase Very enthusiastic and
grade point averages. experienced new things knowledgable about the subject.
The service learning assignments This course was easy to finish
Were not difficult and covered were very rewarding and relevant The instructor was not easy to get because of the time given to finish
material in we learned in class. to the course. a hold of outside of class. assignments.
I believe that she is a good person
with good intentions. But, I believe
that she's a little full of herself. I
understand that she wants to
prepare us for masters course
work, but frankly, some of us are
not going on to grad school, and
those of us who are will get grad
studies when we get there. I
enrolled in her class as an
undergrad, so that's the course
work I expect to have to contend
with. And, I was very 'put off' by
her statements that implied that
we hadn't learned anything before Not really sure how to improve it,
coming to her class, as if we had all as there seemed to be so much
the class was lacking...I really can't just fallen off trucks and dumb left out. We only occasionally
say what was missing, but there before coming to her. A lot of us reviewed assignments, and never
was something missing...almost had come from other really discussed concepts related
like she tried to teach so much, schools/programs/classes and we to readings. Considering all the
It would be helpful if the teacher that she failed to teach anything at managed to get to where we are chapters that were read, and all
taught what she wants us to know, all. She 'mentioned' some things in on our own merits. So I did not the material contained in them, I
or somehow indicates what, out of passing, but didn't teach concepts appreciate her minimizing my have to say that someone needs to
6 or 7chapters of information, she and encourage critical thinking previous efforts because her ego seriously take another look at that
considers test materials. Also, with regards to the things that tells her that she's the only teacher class, and maybe consider
reviews would be helpful. were at least mentioned. there who can teach. restructuring it.
Professor Lacy has been very
professional and I am impressed
with this class. I was taking this
I have to say I haven't done well on class for a business degree,
my test but she is very You have to do a lot of writing for however, now I am look into The syllabus is very clear. We have
encouraging telling me not to give this class but it will help you with human service. I would like to known from the first day of class
up. I will do better on my final and your analytical, and critical thank her for the Myers Briggs what was expected. If we
hopefully I will be pleased with my thinking skills. I did not want to assessment and for steering me in completed assignments on time
grade. write but I did. the right direction. there wasn't a problem.
Would like more time to complete Very innovative in teaching
examinations great methods Too many assignments
Very open and willing to help and
Fair and reasonalbe Very useful content discuss course content Pretty easy to follow
Dr. Lacy has a lot of insight about
The examinations covered this subject, she encourages
materials that were talk about in students to be self-sufficient and
class. I wish we could be directed not to expect her to be reminding
to the material that is most them about what they are
relevant for the examination so supposed to do, but at the same
that we can focus on it, since there time offers them an opportunity to
is lots of information that is Yes, the content of this course is ask her questions and advise about Exam study guides would be
covered. what i expected it to be. course related issues. helpful.
The instructor was very
knowledgeable and easy to
understand. She meet the needs
of her students as a whole. She is
The exams were reasonable and The course content was very a person that you would want to
fair. relevant to the course itself. know and learn under.
she is too busy doing everything to it is a heavy work load especially
the information was releevant to fully put herself into one thing at a for students taking more than four
they were fair this course time classes in a semester
I honestly would prefer to have
less online days. I think that it
makes the course somewhat
Thorough. Number of questions is harder to follow and discourages
fair. working together with peers.
The syllabus was unclear in two or
more assignments which I feel was
This evaluation is being completed disadvantageous. Why are two
Too many chapters are covered on I took this course because it is a the week prior to finals and grades books and so many internet
one test. We had an open book requirement. There were too have not been received for assignments necessary for this
test and I barely passed it. This many projects and no assignments turned in in October. class? Why can't one book be
was the lowest grade I have ever consideration for other classes. I This should be an indication that selected which covers the material
made on a college test and it was have not received grades yet for there are too many assignments. I as well as incorporate the internet
not for lack of studying. Obviously, assignments submitted in October. know the instructor's time is assignments. Powerpoints on each
I did not take the proper notes or This should be an indication of the valuable but my phone calls were chapter might be helpful and a
study the correct material. heavy workload. never returned. review.
Instructor is fair Course content is clear I would recommend this professor I would recommend this course
Working with Dr. Lacy is always
fun! She keeps everyone
interested even when the material We could have used more online
is boring. time vs. classroom.
All are pertenient
Dr. Lacy is a great professor that
really ensure that the student
understand and know what is The structure of the class was a bit
required in her class. Her fast pace and the assignments
standards for the class are very overwhelming for me because I
This class was very difficult and I The course materials were high and she is a very fair have no previous knowledge of
feel it was also fair. relevant for the course instructor. finance.
She helped us understand when
we didn't understand, she broke
questions down to where
everyone would understand.
good good Excellent good
The assignments were fair, difficult All information and assignments
and time consuming. were relavant to the course. Caring, knowledgeable and fair. good structure
The course structure was a bit
strange for me because I have
I enjoyed this course; and I feel as never been in a hybrid course
though the subject matter was before this semester. I did,
relevant. I feel as though what I I really enjoyed Dr. Lacy. She has a however, feel as though it allowed
learned can be applied to the real good attitude, and always is time for our service learning
Exams were fair and appropriate. world". " professional. projects and assignments.
Very helpful when you actually get Very knowledgeable about the Somewhat was not followed as we
Very easy if you read. into the field. field. were told.
The examinations in this course The course content in this course I liked the way this class was set
were very straight forward and were very helpful in understanding up. I liked that more 'hands-on'
covered the material covered in how things were done in the activies were included within in
the course. I didn't have to worry Physical Education settings. I had rather than just reading and
too much about any of the never before realized just how watching movies, for that helped
questions not being covered in much went into the activities they Dr. Stork was a very kind professor me to better understand the
class, because he made certain do in those classes, and this class and explained things in a very concepts that were being talked
that they were. helped me to learn that. thorough manner. about in calss.
We needed structure period.
At first the instructor covered the
material at a good pace, and then
it became repetitive for a good
solid month. I felt that we spent
too much time on the first area,
which is why we did not have but
one or two days to cover the rest
of the content needed for the
final. In addition, I did not
appreciate the instructor's
complaints about our class to the
other class later on in the day. It is
very unprofessional and rude to
those of us in his earlier class. Also,
I did not agree with his giving extra
The course was based on one points to students on lesson plans
exam which was not a good idea. I just because he thought they did
feel that it was not a good idea to really good! It is not fair to those
base my grade, and everyone of us who worked hard on our
else's grade on one exam! I feel lesson plans, and did not receive
that the review for the exam was extra points. Also, I did not like
messy and there was not much The course content seemed to be how one student imparticular had I felt that the course syllabus was
time put into the making of the more relevant to people who are a grade of 105, and didn't even not followed, and that that the
review. Also, the instructor did not physical education majors and know why! She claimed that timing spent per area should be
make it clear as to what he was those who want to be instructors maybe it was because she sat in worked on. Overall, I feel that the
asking for on a certain number of in that area. Overall, I felt that the the front all the time and course should have been taught
questions on the one exam we instructor could have shown to us answered all of his questions! This every now and then at a gym in
had. I am sure that the final exam how this subject can be integrated is not fair to me and the rest of the order to follow through with some
will be the same way. into the classroom. students in the early class. of the activities.
Dr. Stork, Is an excellent professor
that motivates me to engage in his
class. I was honor to have him as
my professor. He is energize and
enthusiastic to teach.I loved being
fair I loved the content. in his class never miss a day. I loved the course structured.
The review sheet given to us for
the first exam was so confusing I I don't understand how this course Does not seem to connect the
did not know what to study. The will help me in my future career. material to what he is talking
topics that were listed were not especially since the instructor about it. Don't know why we did
found in the book or my notes. focused on PE course material. thrwoing scrafs for so long.
The exams were difficult but we The course content was Very enthusiastic and willing to
learned information from them. appropriate. teach. Detailed.
No real notes given during course. Be more prepared for class. Once,
His lesson were repetitive but his he just winged the lesson. Had no
midterm was 150 questions and all powerpoints but went off his
fill in the blanks with no word bank personal notes and was scatter in
or any multiple choice. His review all areas. Did not use the book but
worksheet for the final and had his information from another
midterm was worthless. book he was familiar with. This course had no real stucture!
This course is designed for
kinesiology majors and therefore Dr. Stork is a really great man who
was not an interesting course at knows his material. I never knew
all. I think that it should be tailored there was so to learn about kicking Again if the course was tailored
Examinations were challenging for education majors since 98% of a ball and the techniques available more to education majors it would
and required a commitment on my the students in this course are to teach a child to kick a ball. be more interesting. At times I felt
part to study. The first study guide education majors. The course However, he does talk a whole lot like I wasn't learning how to teach
for the test was HORRIBLE because should focus more on teaching and sometimes the conversations a physical education class but
it was harder to decipher the study strategies for physical education are not that interesting so we more how to teach students how
guide than the actual test. The test and not so much on teaching a daydream a lot in his class. Also his to play games. Also more projects
was a bit wordy but overall was child how to kick a ball- for goofy style of teaching sometimes are needed in this course to bring
good. example. detracts from our learning. the classroom instruction to life.
This instructor was confusing and
used bad strategies to teach the
class. The instructor was also very
unprofessional, in that he let his
other section know that does not
enjoy teaching our section. There
is no rubric provided before big
assignments/projects. The
expectations of assignments are
only taught a piece at a time. The
professor also gives no explanation
for other students recieving extra
credit. He gives extra credit with
no warning to students that he will
do so. The professor has no
intentions in changing his teaching
strategies once he finds them
nonbeneficial. He states he gives
extra credit on,the way he sees
fit," to students without explaining
beforehand to students he will do
so. When I tried to reach the
professor outside of class several The structure on the rubric seems
times through e-mail, I never organized, creative, and
recieved a response. The instructor stimulating. I would have liked to
also revealed his feelings on the learn more on this subject. The
published book made by Karen professor did not follow the rubric;
Weiller, which I felt was very therefore I felt very lost and did
unprofessional. The other students not let us know he changed dates
in this class had to rely on each on assignments or teachings. I did
other for support and information. not miss one day of this class, yet I
Content that was taught with this He did not convey information in still felt lost. I wish the professor
professor had nothing to do with an efficient manner. This professor had followed the rubric. I would
Exams were confusing and no the book. I only used one page of was unprofessional, have felt more accomplished and
derivative of the book used. the book the whole semester. uncommunicative, and messy. " stimulated.
This instructor is very fun, but he
gets carried away easily and often
gets off subject. He has a lot of
experience and you can tell that he
cares about what he teaches
which is something that I respect.
Very easy
I had taken the first part of
linguistics and to me it was kind of
difficult so I really didn't want to
take the second part, but Dr.
Shappeck made the assigments
really clear; we were able to think
creativelly but also apply the
knowledge taught. I can say that I
loved this class and learned alot
The assigments were to the point and I know what I learned will help
specific and clear. me when I became a teacher.
I am honor to have such a wise
professor. Dr. Shappeck has made
this class fantastic to be in. I look
forward coming to class each day. I
I have learned in the different have learned a lot of new material.
ways I am able to teach children Dr. Shappeck is available for us if
The examinations are good. the L2. we need him. I love the course structure.
Very nice and respectful. Loves to
be involved in your class work.
The examinations are fair, the
information was reviewed after
the lessons taught and questions He is a very nice man, he make
where asked to assure that we The information is on tract and himself available for questions
were ready for testing. prudent for the subject. during and after class. N/A
The structure is fine..but would
Logistics can be very tedious probably be better if the class was
They are only difficult if you have subject, but the professor He is very patient and always asks offered an hour earlier (6pm-9pm)
not read the assigned chapters attempts to keep the class if anyone needs additional instead of (7pm-10pm). This is a
pertaining to the exam..Exams are involved and interested by relating examples and will make sure most tedious subject, and having the
multiple choice, true/false and to current affairs and things of that everyone is on same page before class late in the day can make
essay type..pretty fair. nature. continuing concept. some just tune out.
Course content was very relevant
and up to date. I think I am
starting to see logistics in
everything that I do now. From
buying a soda from the I think the structure of the coures
The Exams where quite fair for the convenience store, to going was very stable. We would general
most part. The essay questions shopping at walmart, or just going discuss chapters in class, take
stretched my ability and allowed to pump gas. Logistics and supply I think the instructor was very quizes the following week over the
me to explain in detail the answer chain management play a part in good. Attentive, and very chapters discussed, as well as
to the questions all of it. professional. other assigned duties.
The examinations were fair and at I enjoyed this course. It assisted
a right length. me with my current job.
The exams were difficult because
there were many essays that had
to be written, but I found that it
helped me out understanding the The course content was relevant.
material. One thing I wish is that I Some of the chapter were really
would like to have known what to long and brutal, but I manged to Great instructor. Will be taking
specifically study for. eventually get through it. him again in future classes.
This instructor is very fair. I really like professor Mitra.
This class could just have easily
been taken online, especially since
the daily quizes were from the
book material instead of the
classroom instruction. While some
Exams are mostly essay type classmates needed the instructors
questions, which were easily feedback, for a general concepts
completed within the time class I don't believe it was
allotted. absolutely necessary.
GOOD GOOD Great JOB TEACHING GOOD
He brings real world experience to
the classroom and explains things
using real world examples.
Very knowledgeable, fair to all
students. Has true experience
from the business world and not
just text book knowledge,
therefore the student gets a true
Very challenging and very fair education
Supply Chain Game required a
partner. Your grade is penalized if Did not enjoy the Supply Chain
you happen to pick a bad partner Game portion of class. Required
and they don't do their share of constant attention for 7 straight
the work. Should grade the game days while the game ran". I work
individually. The game partner full time and have other classes as
costs me my A in the class. well."
Good Examinations involving Instructor ties everything together
multiple choice and essay Loved the simulation game well
I would like to have more field
trips in this course/major - LSCM.
Also, should there be any activities
that should take place here at the
The instructor is very school that remotely involve
knowledgeable. I appreciate that LSCM, LSCM students be informed
All of our examinations are in he is down to earth and works at of such to be able to participate
essay form. It was a challenge, but giving individuals chances at and become knowledgeable of
Iv come accustomed to the format. The course content is good as is. proving themselves. issues here on campus.
Great instructor. One of the best
I've had in Denton or Dallas.
Only one word describes this
instructor, AWESOME!!!! He is the
type of personality the university
needs not these over educated,
over rated individuals who cannot
connect with their students. Ames
is a wonderful instructor and is
well worth both the time and
money. He motivated me
throughout the semester. He
genuinely cares about his students
and provides feedback throughout
the semester. What a genuine
person. Very down to earth. He
I only took the course because of can actually come down to the
The exmas are very straight Ames. I could have taken a students level thereby motivating the course structure is very
forward. Ames explains everything marketing class, which interests one to do their best just to make straightforward and easy to follow.
in great detail and encourages me much more but love his him proud. He gets an A+++++ in the instructor actually sticks to the
questions to clarify doubts. teaching. I actually learn with him. my grade book. syllabus!
this was a great course i learned
alot of things and would highly
recommnd this course to any
student i feel i have learned more
in this clas hen i have in most of
veryy understanding and willing to my other classes since being in
very fair good content stay after class for students high school.
I have learned a lot.For instance,in My professor makes our classroom
making brochures, web environment interesting and
Fairness page,PowerPoint, Micro Worlds. enjoyable to be in. I love it.
In my personal opinion I would not
allow this instructor back, yes
somethings that she does is good,
but she does not teach the class,
this class was to meet every week
and the instructor took it upon
herself to change the course to
every other week if that. the
the exam were ok, we were given instructor would never stay on
a review sheet for the two exams topic of the course and she would
but do i think they were fair, no I always refer to her job and what
do not how can we be tested over had happened or what they did
information that was not tought to and to her daughters, she did not
us, we basically had to teach teach the class she told stories and
ourself. and that is not good for read a power point explaining the
any class, even on internet classed chapter but not teaching the
the teacher is there to help when the course onctent was very good, chapter. I would not recommend
needed via email. not a problem at all there this instructor to anyone the course is fine jus the instructor
The exams are fair and are based Explains material well and is very
on what we have learned. It is good information to know. helpful. Very good.
This instructor goes off topic A
LOT. It was frustrating having to
sit through her random stories
when I worked all day and had a The course structure is awful.
family that I wanted to get home There is way to much weight on
to. She kept us in class for three attendance for a class that hardly
I felt as though her exams was the hours and I would say that more meets. There is no leniency for
perfect level of difficulty. They The course was okay. I did not than half of the time was NOT minor errors. The entire class is
definitely required studying, but learn much. I felt like it was a instruction. If she had used her based on 100 points. And if you
she did not throw random material waste of time and money because time more efficiently, I could have got one point off of one
in the test that no one was I only learned how to use one new been home by 8:30 instead of assignment, that was 1% of your
expecting. program. 10:30. grade.
The instructor was very fair. She
explained everything in detail. The
thing I liked the most is that she
Exams were very easy. The review The information taught in the was always available if I had a
helped very much. course was very helpful. question.
Technology in the schools is very
She was very fair and provided important in todays electronic She was very insightful and had a
information regarding what would environment. As a teacher I will be lot of experience working as a I enjoyed the fact she was very
possibly be on the test so we could incorporating technology in my teacher in the public school detailed oriencted and we knew
study. lesson planning. district. what to expect every class.
I liked the class and I tought that
They were fair, since the beginning the projects we worked on this
she explained exactly what she semester were relevant to the She is a great teacher, I would take Loved it, she is very organized,
wanted us o study. course. her again. there were never any surprises.
I liked how she lecture because
Pretty easy class that is fair in she always related stories based
work. on her lecture. Easy flow and is pretty easy
Mrs. Gallager is an awsome
instructor. She kept the class very
interesting, up-beat,and worth the
while. The evening classes are very
difficult to get through, but Mrs
I thought the exams were fair. We This course was interesting, Galleger made this class so much
were given test reviews and that relevent and I learned a lot that I fun that I didn't mind it was an The course structure was well put
was very helpful. will take with me to my field. evening class. together
COurse structure is good, but the
book does not help, he had to
Great instructor, very adjust book content,there is no
Test cover the material taught in Course content is what i needed to approachable always available for point on purchasing a book for this
an appropriate matter take college algebra successfully help course just the online material
very good taught well really tries hard, great person I loved it
Material is not so easym but
instructor made it easy to
understand. Made my class fairly Very hard content,but very Loved the instructor, very kind and good structure, did a good job
graded. interesting helpful. completing his syllabus
its pretty easy
Very good, but needs more time
great, just needs more time in avaiable for one-on-one with
fair and required great Math Lab students.
The content of this course is good ,
but the use of the computers for
math is a little fustrating not being The teacher has done a
This course is what is expected of a able to access all the information magnificent job in teaching his
college level math course. needed. class. The course structure is perfect.
organized, always prepared,
clearly stated up front, relevant willing to work with each student
fair material outside of class
He's great at explaining everything
but sometimes he goes around the
main idea. Sometimes I wish he'd
The exams were less complicated The subject matter seemed do- just get to the point but I know
versions of the homework. Easy to able in a sense. Some areas were that not all students learn that
understand and complete. difficult to understand right away. way. N/A
Even though math is not a subject
that I particurally enjoy, I feel that
being in Mehmet's class really
helped me get more out of it than I
may have originally gotten.
Exams are appropriately difficult This course is an important basis
and relevant to what we go over in for further math classes, and is He is very helpful and good at I like the way the lectures are set
class. useful in day to day life. explaining complex ideas. up.
Exams are fair. They arent difficult
unless you did not study the I am horrible at math so I took this
material given. Instructor goes class because it was required. I feel I really dislike online assignments
over all material for the exam to like math classes should only be Explains very well but class is really because I dont have access to a
make sure everyone does well. taken by math majors. boring. computer often
I feel that the exams are just hard
enough where you can effectly Dr. Mehmet is an excellent
apply yourself. instructor. they are good.
Dr. Celik is an amazing instructor.
He has helped me succeed in The structure of this course was
mathematics where others have well-defined in the syllabus. There
failed. He is ALWAYS available, are homework assignments, online
maintains good outside-of-class quizzes, in class quizzes, and
communication, and is always exams. There are plenty of
The difficulty and number of All course content and subject excited and eager to help. He is a opportunities to get points and
exams are fair in this course. matter is relevant to this course. true asset to UNTD. earn a good grade in this class.
The course content was simple The instructor was very funny and
and easy to keep up with, I think that was good for the class
These exams were very simple if everything was related to a because I feel like it released some The course structure is fast paced
you did the homework and situation that could be used in real of the tension and we were able to and sometimes it seems hard to
listened to his lectures in class. life which I enjoyed. learn in an open environment. keep up.
The Exams are very easy if you do The things he teaches are very
your homework and quizzes on hard but he makes it easy to One of the best instructors I have It is hard but with studying it is
time. understand. had. capable to master.
I am not fond of math, i have I really enjoy his teaching style, he
always dreaded taking math in really cares about us as students
college, but the content in this and wants us to understand the
class was not as hard as I had subject completely. Very good
They are adequate. imagined it to be. Useful. instructor. Over all, i think its good.
They are du=ifficult, but relevant Course cntent was explained He is a great teacher full of
to the material. thoroughly enthusiasm. The course is structured very well.
I felt like He did his best to help me
with all the problems that I was
having in the course. I am
understanding the course better
after I had a 13 year lay-off from
Math. Because He stuck with me
when I couldn't get it right away.
The instructure shows class I think the instructor does an
material pertaining to our excellent job teaching the subject
Exams are difficult but they're fair. preceived majors. matter. The course is well design.
This class had three exams and a
final and each exam has a review This instructor is very
which it really help to students. knowledgeable about the subject.
This instructor is pretty nice and
well explaning compared to most
of my teacher taken before and
am taking this semeseter. Gives
Instructor fill in the blanks extention to assignments which
questions for first exam, which This course in based on the helped me work on the
was not fair and on second exam Business area of Mathematics assignments for much more longer
multiple choice questions which which is very different the basic and prepare for quizzes and Needs more tutors in during Lab
was interesting and fair to me. math such College Algebra. examinations. times.
fair Fair although misunderstood!
Questions come from the
homework, but the difficulty
varies. I would suggest to space
out the material in the exams. Good course content in which this Good structure. Everything follows
Trying to review many sections of class is a math class that can be Excellent math instructor. He the syllabus at the beginning of the
different chapters is very difficult used in the workplace works out everything in detail. semester
Wonderful instructor that made
I thought this course has relevant class interesting, and not boring.
material that will help me in the Explains everything very clearly,
Overall fair class future with business. and thoroughly. N/A
Please allow students to leave
upon completion of the
exam/quizzes.
The content is not that advanced
because some of the things are pretty good instructor, really
things we saw in high school but it explains everything and uses the
The class is somehow difficult but really go to see it again here to board a lot which is good because
the teacher makes it easy to learn more and to know how it some teachers just go through
understand connects to business slides -
Exams and homework was
The instructors interpretation of planned correctly. The course
Exams were provided in a multiple The material was not explained the classroom setting was that material was not explained to a
choice as well as fill in the blanks. pertaining to business. More each individual was already level that met each persons
Credit was also given for clarification on business aspects familiar with the course material. I knowledge skill. Tutorials was
attempting to solve each problem were needed to gain a better personally have never taken provided but no one on one time
which encourages me to continue understanding of the usage and calculus so staying on track was a was provided. I personally hired a
to try. material. challenge. tutor to assist with the material.
He is a great instructor. Always
there to help students, great at
very fair and easy if you study the Very useful for business major teaching and making the math
review person. interesting.
Very Fair
I like the course structure. There is
great diversity in graded material
Dr. Celik is very passionate about between online homework
The exams are fairly difficult, but if math. He seems to truly care assignments, class project, quizzes,
you study and do all of the Coursework is relevant. I like how about his students, and takes the and exams, there are many
assigned homework, they are the professor links the coursework time to make sure that everyone in different ways to show
definitely fair. to real business situations. the class understands. achievement.
The professor makes assignments Stays on subject and is very
available to prepare for the test Interesting subject, easy to helpful, makes his time available
and the review are very helpful. comprehend with practice. to help students succeed. Good
the fairness level in this class was She did improve towards the last
not fair, the instructor was never the course content is relevant to few weeks of class but we needed
clear on what she wanted, and she the course, but the instructor tht the whole time of the course.
would state one thing and then needs to explain how to teach it She has improved but still needs
count off for it. better. more
she is very helpful. does a good job
of updating and respond back fast
on black board. have all the
powerpoint presentation on there
as well. she have a lot of hand on
activities. every useful for kids.
there a lot of complains from other
students in the class about her,
and the way she teaches all the materials covered in the
the math isnt difficult, its showing throughout the semester, but in class is fairly easy but using certain
how i got the answers and being my opinion she doesn a really method and being able to show all
able to explain it. im so used to good job and should continue the steps is something im not used
getting the answer great class doing what she been doing to.
this course was very hard for me, I
have never dealt with Pre-Cal or he was very understanding to my
trig before, i was not required to situtation and helped me
take these classes when i was in understand and gave me extra
high school back in the 80's. very relevant time to finish some work.
Dr. Arya is the best professor ever! we covered a lot of content which i
his exams are fair and challenging loved because it was great review i would encourage other students
sometimes to me Great man! to take his course
While the course content was
difficult the exams were fairly easy
because they were so well in line
with the course content. I would
have preferred fewer tests and
quizzes but since they were so
frequent I feel I have a better Very difficult, very good, and very Fantastic instructor; I wish I had
grasp of the course material. relevant. him for Calculus 2 next semester.
Dr. Ike is one of the only teachers
anywhere, that I have encounter,
to have the pulse of the students
as it related to calculus 1. He really
knows how to explain the subject course structure was delivered
content of the course is matter in ways that I could with relevant subjects that
examination are fair and relevant. appropriate understand and made it fun. pertained to the next.
Please incorporate teaching all
probability distributions
traditionally and with graphing Very friendly. Recognizes the
calculator. Very important ot learn glossiness in our eyes when we
how to solve these problems on don't understand, and does not
the calculator. Not included in embarass us. He just shows us
course lessons, but many online another way or another example.
lecturers demonstrate resolutions Seemed to be new at teaching
on the calculator. Much easier to probability, but got into the groove
do. soon enough.
Great professor, well structured
straight to the point and at
thesame time very helpful
NOT A DIFFICULT CLASS. I WILL
RECEIVE A D MOST LIKELY BUT
THAT IS BECAUSE I WASN'T A GREAT INSTRUCTOR. SHE
TRYING MY BEST I WAS SLACKING EXPLAINED THE WORK REALLY
OFF. WELL.
My teachers design a well-
organized course structure. It
doesn't go with her syllabus at the
I like this class, it has many new beginning but she gives us
information that i haven't been announcements of changes
learning before My teacher is very nice and helpful throughout the course
Great instructor. Encourages the
students involvement. Would
recommend to others. She worked
Fair. By far one of the easier math with me throughout the semester
courses first course I didn't have to when I had other problems going
attend tutoring to understand. on.
well organized and challengeable interesting always prepare easy to understand
This is a great teacher I understood it completely
Dr. Celik is very nice. He lets you
know when he is available and is
good with communicating what he
expects, such as when a quiz or
test is and what sections it will
cover. He offers help in the math
lab
The test were fair and good range
of questions.
it pretty difficult and it's fair to
everyone it's a hard but interesting class hes a great professor.
The first exam was fair; however, I
do not feel the last two exams The course content was difficult
were fair. It had problems not for me...maybe because we were She is not lenient with her grading Too much information for one
covered in class. rushed throughout the semester policies semester
Exams were difficult and Very nice and willing to explain
sometimes it felt as if not all the things if went to her outside of
material was covered. n/a class. n/a
Very decent easy Nice Ok
A GREAT TEACHER. SHE EXPLAINS
THE LESSONS VERY WELL.
Great
The content of the course was well
organized and the subject was well The course structure was well
The exams are at an average level explained; except for the chapter The professor is neat, good, and done. Several opportunities to
with some challenging problems of the functions which needed a well-organized. She is always improve grades were given which
that require a higher level of logic more clear explanation of the available for students when help is is a good way of motivating
knowledge. concepts. needed. students to do better.
I feel the grading is not what it
should be, credit for information
that is known at least should be
given a little more credit than is
given. The feeling that is given
sometimes from the instructor is
The examinations were fair to a more of a stupid feeling just
certain extent it went a little too because we don't know exactly
further beyond just the covered how she wants even though we
homework that was given. know what is being asked.
I like them... they are challenging relevant
I enjoyed Prof. Khan. I think that
I think that the exams were I think that this course is good but she illuminated and clarified some
difficult but I didn't put as much the time required was inordinate aspects of the course that I missed
time into this course as I would for me to do as well as I would the first time around when I took
have liked. have hoped. the class at the Denton campus.
She is a good instructor.
I think we have problems on
writing the proof, answer, when it
comes to number problem we can
do it great, but we have problems we spend much time on previous
with writing the problem, proving chapters, and we go quite quick at
theory Dr. Khan is helpful and nice the end of the semester
Examinations were fair. Excellent teacher!
The instructor is very nice and
The instructor tests us on subjects knows her subject but her teaching
that we have not covered The course content is interesting is not easy to understand and not
sufficiently, making the test but I do not see the relevance of it enough time is spent on reviewing
difficult. to middle school education. or preparing for tests.
The exams and quizzes often
contain questions on information The instructor does not always This course was not properly
that has not been covered in class seem prepared. She is usually paced. Many topics were rushed
and is not easily discovered reasonable regarding grades, after and not covered at all as presented
through the textbook. a mistake has been made. in the syllabus.
Course is difficult. The tests
challenging. Needs to learn how to teach better
The text book is not appropriate
for students learning this new
The professor is helpful to subject since it does not provide If use better textbook, this course
students learning. enough examples. yes, could be good class.
at times you get graded depending
on how she feels, and i don't like
that the people she knows get
graded softer.
required closed attention and time
exams were fair and clear. it was challengeable. she is a good teacher. to understand.
I was under the impression that
The class was too fast paced. It felt this class would introduce
like I had to recall material from all techniques to be used when
my past math classes on the spot teaching high school. This,
and the material was very spread however, was not the case as we
out meaning that too many topics covered material from all of our
were covered in one class period math courses without applying
alone and we were expected to HOW these topics are introduced
master everything for the weekly in high schools to help students
quizzes. understand the material.
I think having three exams was a
good thing. They were very fair in
that they covered what was said All content was helpful and
was going to be covered. relevant towards the course. Very good at explaining. Good.
Very good instructor and was
available for outside help when
Exams were all fair N/a needed na
I believe the exams taken in this
course were quite fair. Everything
presented on the exam was I believe the course content was
presented in some form in prior very relevant to the course. Never
classes to the exam. Also, a review did we study material that we I think we did spend too much
sheet with plenty of information to didn't need to know. We went He is a good instructor. He is time explaining how to build a
be covered on the exam was along with the book and skipped patient and takes his time proof. I think that should have
presented with enough time to material the instructor found explaining the material before been covered in a Real Analysis
study. unnecessary moving on. course.
Awesome teacher, because he
the teacher helped us connect the cared about his/her students to He is a great teacher, he knows
The class was fair, not too hard. content with the real world. develop their knowledge. how to motivate students to learn.
I really like this instructor he is well
know of the subject, he explains The only problem is that as usual
very clear. Also, he has been we did not cover all the material
patient with all the students. He we had planned in the syllabus. It
had to review on the previous is tough to teach so much content
I like this class, I like most of the courses we had taken. He and at the same time wait on the
This class is challenging. I have topics covered. It was fun to be in encourages us to learned and to students to understand all the
learned a lot in this class . this class. like Math. concepts.
exams were difficult course content was relevant good instructor course structure was good
Good teacher. I think she confused
some of us at times with her last I didn't care for all the group work
Examinations were not difficult at I think everything we did in class minute assignments but I feel like I and discussion everyday but that's
all. was relevant to the subject. learned a lot from the class. just me.
Very Fair!!! She expected us to
know what she taught! You missed
class, you messed yourself up!! She is very strict and demands She had everything planned out
Exams were perfect. respect! I loved her as a professor! just right!
The exams were fair but I was
initially intimidated because I
didn't understand how the timer The course content was clear and
worked on black board. I was relevant. However, I think it would Dr. Patton is a good instructor and
under the impression that I only work out better if we could work made the course very clear and
had 20 seconds to answer each individually on a grant proposal so understanding. She has provided The course was an overall good
question but later learned that that everyone can get the me with tools that I can use in my experience for me and was clear
was not the case. understanding of the full process. graduate studies. and understanding.
Difficult to follow the questioning.
Too difficult to understand
problems because wording is Easy to follow course content
confusing. outline NA Easy to follow course structure
Exams in this class were a bit
difficult, and by difficult I mean
confusing. We had four exams in
this class. Each exam was open
book/notes. The book helps, but
the way the questions are worded What we learn in this class is not
is what makes them confusing. only interesting, but very
Some of the questions are long, important as well for a business
and there are a lot of questions on major. We learn about preparing The instructor is very respectful
the test as well. But if you read the all kinds of business messages, and understanding. She explains We have four exams and two
book and pay attention in class, it preparing resumes, and about job the material very well, and she presentations(one team and one
makes the exams easier. interviews. cares for her students. individual).
she is very good at what she do. i didnt like the fact that it was a 3
even though they were all multiple this material is very important in she knows what she is talking hour straight course. i would have
choice or true/false it was hard but everyday life and i am glad that i about and she explains it very well rather taken it two days a week
i still passed so i am glad took this course and is good at teaching instead of once a week
I felt that the examinations were This course was relevant to the
fair, its was the amount of time subject matter. It was also a help I enjoyed they way the class was
given to take the exams that in understanding how to organize taught. I mostly enjoyed class
challenged me the most. my business. Dr. Gotkan was very personable. discussions and current events.
Difficult because of the wording. Needs more assignments so that
Some of the concepts of hard to test grade will not count as 90% of
understand. grade. She is very understanding.
The course content is quite The instructor is well equip for this
Fair and consistent interesting course The course was planned out nicely
Excellent teacher would
recommend her to anyone. I feel
like she not only brought
knowledge but her personal I like the way the class was
The exams were fair and only experiences into the classroom, structured. It was like open
difficult if you are not which made it more interesting to conversation instead of the regular
comprehending the material. me. structured classes I was use to.
Exams are not difficult if you read Instructor is friendly and fair to
powerpoints that she goes over. every student.
The Examination percentage is
Larger. Great Overall a good Professor!
exams are easy if you look at the Evaluated out of 100 points, which She does have a large weight on
material closely. She should have a is not much but works in a wierd the exams but gives them online
small curve on there though. way. Every Nice so it helps
Try and make the cousre a little
more fun. Try playing business
The case senarios were hard but games, or having students creat
thats part of the job not everything their dream job with opes and It is a faily understandable class,
will be easy or fun. I get that. It was good possibilities. but it was at times boring to me.
the exams are difficult. excellent teacher!
The course contained information
on company and corporation She is very knowledgeable in the Very structured and followed
structure, management and material and is excited about all of syllabus. When changes were
Questions were challenging, coworker traits, and best the innovations in organizational made, we were informed by email
material was well reviewed. management practices. behavior. and in class.
the instructor would read the
slides and then repeat what she
read. told the same stories over boring what's the point of coming
are online which are not too course content is a little outdated. and over. was boring. but it is easy if all she does is reads the slides
difficult. over all good the course needs to be revised to get a good grade and gives the test open book
Not all of the material is difficult, Course content is stated very Great instructor, highly
but some is. clearly. recommended course structure is good.
Dr. Mitro is new and appears to be
establishing himself well. He is
very considerate, but at times he is
difficult to follow. He conveys a
real desire to help us understand
Exams were fair. I would say the It is relevant, but not very the concepts. He is passionate
tests were moderately difficult. interesting. about the subject. The structure is good.
I have seen an improvement over
the semester. His accent was
challenging at the beginning of the
semester. His first case study
lacked adequate instruction
initially. He came back and gave
assistance about a week before it
was due. He strives to determine
I am not sure that I see the the appropriate level of difficulty I liked the math with this course.
The exams require students being relevance of this course for Human for this course. He is very However, some of the
familiar with the entire chapter. Resource Mgmt; however, it knowledgeable and his confidence inadequacies we experienced in
Essay questions are the most would be very relevant for Supply in his ability as a teacher will grow statistic courses made some of it
challenging, yet the exams are fair. Chain Management. as he gains more experience. more difficult.
difficult and requires a knowledge very knowledgable on the subject
very fair of stats matter very nice i loved it
was difficult in the beginning but
adjustments were made after
stats should be a prerequisite great instructor complaints
Stats should be a requirement
before you take this course. He is very hard to understand.
His accent is difficult to
understand. He originally was
teaching the class at a higher level
than what we could understand.
He changed the course to bring it
down to a level that we could
comprehend. He is a little slow at
communicating our grades with us
and returning emails. He isn't a
bad professor, but he wouldn't be
someone who I would take again
unless he was the only professor
offered.
Course comment was initially very
difficult, while using statistics but I
was happy when an adjustment to
Very fair. the class was made. Very good and energetic professor. Good so far.
I think Dr. Mitra is knowledgeable,
but unfortunately is not successful
at presenting the information in a
manner that can be retained. A case study was given within the
Powerpoints were used and first two weeks, on concepts that
discussed, but very little actual had not been explained fully. I
application was discussed. Its think the structure would have
easier to learn and retain a worked better had we discussed
concept when you can see how the material, applied it to a
the parts are interrelated and how business or real life course, and
The book for this course is over it will be applied in the business then did case studies in class to
500 pages and very hard to world. This is an extremely discuss and show the different
understand. Concepts are not important course that I wished we view points. I think everyone
He tries to make the tests based clearly explained or connected were able to gain more value would have benefited much better
on content discussed in class. from chapter to chapter. from. from the class.
He talks really fast, and has the
strongest accent so it makes it
truly difficult to follow along, then
asking him to explain something
further also becomes difficult.
exams are part multi choice, part Tries not too, but loses patience
essay, not too bad when explaining.
great instructor. He had an open
door policy but his attention was
always on his computer while I
talked about problems I was
having in class. I felt at times that
maybe I was being ignored. maybe
I felt the exams were pretty The book was really wordy and the unwelcoming at times. He's very
straight forward. The exams problem I found was the use of respectful, but the open door
followed his lectures proper editions. policy lacks a little structure. great work on the structure.
Instructor began teaching the
course on a much higher level than
which students can understand.
Fair but test on multiple chapters Midway of semester instructor
and was difficult to focus on improved on teaching method and
important subjects. review much better.
Dr. Mitra knows his material well
and is enthusiastic about it too. I
just think the language barrier is
difficult to get over sometimes,
but he definitely tries hard to
make an effort to make sure
everyone understands where he is
in his lecture. I believe once he
I think that the subject matter of learns to pronounce things
this course is a little dull, but correctly, students will understand Initially his syllabus was very
necessary. It is important to his lectures more. Sometimes he intimidating including 4 case
realize the way companies operate can come across as intimidating to studies and about 8-10 quizzes
to achieve efficiency and students because his sharp with 3 exams and so many
effectiveness in every level of manner in which he carries chapters to cover. He quickly
business. Some of the topics I himself, but I believe he is just changed up the structure once he
I believe the exams are fair and an believe should be introduced at a being professional. Very good realized that this was not a
accurate representation of what is much earlier level such as a potential, keep him around and let graduate level course. I appreciate
presented in this course. business class for sophomores. him grow. that.
The instructor is good but
The subject matter was somewhat sometimes I don't always
difficult in certain chapters. We understand some of his examples
needed a few more thorough during lecture. Overall the UNT should stress the
examples to understand the professor is knowlegable about prerequisites of knowing Statistics
The examinations are fair. matter statistics and management. prior to taking this course.
This course is really important, so I He is a good professor, the only
think that it will be better thing I have difficulties
Are OK, a little bit hard though implementing more interactive understanding his accent, other
with some chapters. material. than that he is good.
Fair, very challenging but not to Based a lot off of statistics and Very nice and respectful, a little stuructured for students that
the point that you will fail logistics info difficult to understand should have taken stat 1 and 2
He is a good instructor, you could
tell he wants his students to pass.
He will take the time out of his day
if you have any questions and is
The exams can be difficult but the always open for clarification.
subject itself is difficult. I believe The content is sometimes However, sometimes the subject
Dr. Mitra tries to make the exams confusing and not always well matter is not explained in good
at a level that we can pass. explained... detail.
The instructor is too book smart
and simply cannot come down to
the students level. I am definately
not happy that I paid out of pocket
for this course. I should have taken
a marketing course instead. I
struggled throughtout the
semester. The more he tried to
explain a problem the more
confusing he made it. The strong
accent provided yet another
problem and barrier. Students
would walk out of class half-way
through the lecture. He just
doesnot inspire motivation or
respect in anyway. He would take
forever to post the lecture slides,
sometimes 5 minutes before class
began, on blackboard and just flat
out didnot respond to emails. I
learned NOTHING yet paid to be
If you're going to allow one class stressed out for 15 weeks. What a
to have a take home test you waste of time, money, and energy!
should do it for ALL of your classes Its instructors like these that the
especially the night class for odds Instructor should have gone university may do without I don't
are that people that take night through book and picked out the care what type of degree they
classes work full time unlike the most important points instead of have. If they cannot relate to the
morning students who probably trying desperately to cover student in any way they have no very unorganized even his folders
only hold part-time employment. EVERYTHING and have students business teaching. TEEEERRRIBLE on blackboard were
Exams overall were very difficult. learn and retain nothing. instructor!!!!!!! unorganized!!!!
Very fair and difficult-must be
prepared Very fair and opened minded- Liked the case studies
faire GOOD Great job teaching the course good
The projects that needed to be
A lot of questions, but was very done were very time consuming Knows what she is talking about.
initiative for us to really study. but learned a lot from them. Very informative.
Thought the exams were too hard. Structure was very sloppy and
Essay expectations were not Syllabus was good, but it was not inconsistent. Needs to be
clearly defined. followed. Can be too abrasive. structured well from the beginning
Jane has a strong personality and
desires her way instead of allowing
you to display your ideas,thoughts
and viewpoints. She recommends
making changes that focus on her The structure was fluid as Jane
Exams were fair average thoughts not the students likes to say
very similar to the course. All
questions were answered in
different context throughout the Very difficult but extremely Very informative. know the
entire class. interesting material very well. exciting n/a
not so formal that the class is a
bore, but not so informal that it
comes across unprofessional. has a
firm grasp of real world experience
that makes course material
practical and easy to learn and great structure to keep it
want to learn. makes herself interesting, fun, and diverse for
very valuable information is accessible for questions, clarity of learning. i think it's brilliant the
stimulate thought. cover valid provided. hands on experience as what's expected and flexible for way the course is set up to work
material of couse. plenty of time is well as guest who give valuable the sake of knowing we're not all directly with local entreprenuers
given to complete test real world experience alike. and in groups with peers.
I loved Dr. Muniz. I have taken her
for 3 classes and she has really
helped me to open up during class
debates. She always made me feel
like I had really good points which
encouraged me to become more
involved in class discussions.
The instructor is amazing. She
Content was interesting and very always explain everything clearly
The entire course was fantastic useful. I definitely see myself using and she has a great charisma. Test
and the professor was amazing in what I have learned from the are clear, even thou there are Straight up to the point. HR is very
explaining the material. course. some confusing questions. interesting and helpful.
She is a GREAT instructor. She is
very intelligent and has a lot of
background experience in the HR
field. She is enthusiastic,
Dr. Muniz's exams are difficult and knowledgable, and involves the
require you to think instead of just class in discussions on topics. I
looking up answers. I don't like For the most part, the course would definitely recommend her
that they are in-class even though content is good and relevant. The to other students. I took this class
they are open book, open notes. I only complaint I have is in regards with her because I've had previous
would prefer to take them online. to the case studies. I do not learn classes with her and she did a
They cover an accurate number of anything from them. She does great job. I will take a lot from this
chapters and she gives us the have the class interact and discuss class because she is good at
entire class period to complete an topics and provide our input and conveying the point and explaining
exam. opinions. the information clearly. Very good minus the case studies.
The exams were difficult but ok. It was fine. She was real nice.
This is the second class I've had
with Dr. Muniz -- I would take
Exams are fair. Good mixture of Very interesting course! Many more if I could! She's my favorite
material from the book and topics covered are easy to relate to professor @ UNT Dallas. Very
application questions. She your own personal experiences in knowledgeable and creates a great
provides an outline to use as a the work place. I?ll definitely be a atmosphere for learning in the The course is well organized and
study guide - very helpful! better manager in the future. classroom. expectations are clear.
I really enjoyed the course
content. I might change my major
to Human Resource. All topics I liked the way the course was
The exams where difficult. i had to pertained to this course. I learned Dr.Muniz made the subject structured. I knew what was
read the materials well before the how organizations function on the interesting. She is very good in expected to me and the time
exams. personal level. grabbing students attention. assignments were due.
This is a class that is required for
my major and I have learned SO
MUCH! The tests are fair and very
comprehensive. I like it all. I LOVE THIS INSTRUCTOR!
This instructor, although very
competent, is not what I want
from an instructor. She is I do not like the structure very
thorough and clear about the well. There is too much emphasis
requirements, however, she posts on team presentation and team
power points on blackboard for us work, meaning that every week,
and then reads the same ones to we would have classwork that had
us for class. I don't feel that is to be done with teams. The only
The course content was relevant teaching us anything. Also, this individual work in this class was
for my degree. The subject matter semester, she kept talking about the exams. There was no quizzes.
was good. The content was how she did not have a renewed The attendance record was taken
conflicting. As I mentioned earlier, contract. It made me feel that she too seriously. She took roll at the
The exams were difficult. I do there was a conflict with what wanted pity from the students. It beginning and ending of class. If
believe they are fair but only if you edition of the book to use. I had was nice that she made the you were late or left early, you
had the correct version of the the newest one that the bookstore announcement to those who will were counted as absent for the
book. I had the newest version had and she taught from the miss her, but I think she may have whole period and after four
that was posted on efollet. The previous one. The information been using this personal absences, she stated she would
instructor taught by the previous had changed a bit with new experience to try to incorporate it lower your grade. I think that
one and some of the material was statistics and a different order of into what we learned but it didn't would only have been fair to take
different. chapters. come out right. roll at either time, not both.
Very organized/prepared, makes
Includes everything discussed in sure students are understanding
lecture and textbook.Very fair. Appropriate and very respectful instructor. Very well structured.
Professor Muniz, is a very good
instructor. UNTD needs to take
care of this professor, because she
really takes care of her students.
You will not be doing the students
or this university a favor by not
extending Professor Muniz
contract.
Examinations adequately covered She is very capable of teaching this
the book. Not a fan of human resources. class.
She did a very good job of staying
neutral on subjects and letting the
class make their own decisions.
Made things more interesting
leaving room for debate.
the exams was ok Was ok. Mrs Russell was very nice. Ok
Very Fair with challenging tests Excellent Professor Could be an on line course also.
I did like the structure very well. In
addition to 3 exams, we had
weekly online quizzes that were
due before class started. This
ensured that we read the material
before class and therefore could
participate in class discussions.
We also had extra credit that, a
requirement, we had to
This instructor is excellent. She incorporate current events with
shares her personal experiences as each chapter should we choose to
a former police officer and do so. Also, this instructor
business owner. By doing that, incorporated online classes, using
she helped us put the material Wimba, so that we could have
from the book to real life some experience with online
The content was very rich and situations. She also encouraged us meetings, since this is becoming
The exams were difficult but fair. extremely relevant for any major, to have a voice and have more frequent in the business
We are actually required to make not just business. We covered constructive conflicts in order to world. At first, I did not like it,
sure to read the figures and many topics that are relevant for learn. I think that was very however, by the end of the second
exhibits in the chapters because anyone who is going to work and appropriate since ethics is not a one, I actually felt like I learned
there were questions about them. even discussed current events. clear cut discipline. better in those classes.
She brings a lot of current topics
into the class disscusion.
The instructor has a humor side
that make the subject more
interesting and easy. Like the
Exams are a bit difficult. Notes are flexibility way of teaching interms Course structure is on point. May
important for a good grade in the Course content is intersting a of an online and in class session seem difficult to understand but its
course. Fair exam. relevent to class name. instruction. really isn't.
The instructor is enthusiastic about
the subject. She makes the class
The exams are multiple choice and very interesting by sharing her
true/false. The exams are The course content is interesting experiences, and encouraging
moderately difficult. and relevant. others to do the same. No comment.
Dr. Small wood is a very nice
teacher but I feel that I could of
gotten more out of the class The class was very unorganized
besides what she introduced. and unstructured!
Dr. Smallwood's class consists
primarily of case studies that take
about an hour and a half to
complete in groups. We are then
required to present our
conclusions every week. The case
studies can be done in 10-15
minutes so there is a lot of down
time to do nothing. I have not
learned anything from the case
studies and do not find them
Dr. Smallwood only has 2 exams relevant in learning or used as a
the entire semester, tool to prep for exams. She is too
approximately 50 questions each. focused on APA format. This is not
The exams cover extremely too a writing course, I've already
many chapters and information. completed all of my writing
They cover 5 chapters each and courses. We have logs to complete She is enthusiastic about the topic,
cover material not clearly due at the end of the semester. I however, I do not feel like I have
discussed in class therefore find the logs helpful in learned anything from this
making them extremely difficult. understanding myself better but instructor. Her exams are vague
They do not pertain to class they are not useful. The and cover way too many chapters.
lectures or notes. She does not powerpoints contain exactly what The case studies are a complete This course needs to be relevant
provide reviews and does not is in the chapters, definitions. They waste of time. I would NOT and not busy work. The course
discuss what will be covered in the are not helpful and usually only recommend her to any of my content needs to be reevaluated
exams. take an hour to complete, if that. fellow classmates. as well as the exams.
Always prepaired for class, kept The structure was in line with the
Tough but fair Very relevant students informed. text book.
we covered the text and was able
to relate these topics to everyday Professinal, knowledgeable and
The exam were fair living. efficient Structure easy to navigate
She is a nice lady.
Our course was disorganized and
the expectations were confusing.
We were given a syllabus at the
beginning of the semester with set
expectations for homework and
assignments ? only for this to be
changed almost on a weekly basis.
For example: In the beginning of
the semester, we had to turn in
case studies through blackboard
by midnight on the due date. A
few weeks into the semester, the
instructor changed the turn in
method ? telling us to bring certain
ones to class, and turn in others
Dr. Smallwood was more of a through blackboard. This then
facilitator than an instructor. She changed to bring all your case
didn?t seem very familiar with the studies to class to turn in. And
material, always reading to us eventually, in the last few weeks of
Only 2 exams for the entire directly out of the book or the class, we didn?t bring in any case
semester ? with lots of points that PowerPoint. She would ?lecture? studies and just discussed them in
comprise our grade coming from for about 45 minutes ? then make class. This is concerning because
various meaningless assignments, us break into assigned groups to case studies make up a substantial
instead of being tested on discuss the case studies that we portion of the grade in this class.
retention of the materials covered. Very interesting subject matter ? had completed for class--an It was always confusing in which
Half of Exam 1 was True/False, just not the proper instructor to exercise, in my opinion, that was a manor we would need to submit
which seemed very elementary. teach it. waste of time. our work each week.
Examinations were not an
accurate representation of the
material that was necessary to Very inadequate to teach a
absorb from the class. A multiple- leadership class. Although the
choice exam is very ineffective in a skills and experiences are evidently Reading power point slides for a
leadership class, especially when Analyzing cases in groups, and present, there is no skill present in straight 90-minute period is
creativity, teamwork, and speaking then presenting such cases to the conveying such information to inefficient. Not only is the material
are amongst the areas that the class are a simple waste of time students. Need to incorporate dull when read directly off a slide,
course material tries to gauge. and an insult to any intelligent more of a variety of exercises and but considering the content within
Moreover, questions on each of student. These types of redundant projects that challenge the the slides, a lecture is probably not
the exams were too specific, to the exercises should only be practiced students in something other than the best way to facilitate the class.
point that mundane details were at the high school level...if that. abstract theories and models. Discussions, group projects,
necessary to be retained by the The team-building aspect of it was Putting such models and theories organized argumentation, etc.
student in order to be successful; very helpful though, there just into practice would be the best would all be better ways to go
this again is an inaccurate needs to be more of a variety of way to teach such material. The about running the class and
representation of what the projects for each group to carry higher level of difficulty would meeting the objectives of a
objective of the class is. out throughout the semester. then be justified. leadership class.
She is one of the best instructors I
have ever had. She loves teaching
and she gets the class involved.
Dr. Goktan's exams are somewhat
difficult but cover relevant
material. She does provide oral in-
class exam reviews that are very
beneficial. The exams have an
appropriate amount of time
allotted and questions given so as The course content is very good. She is very enthusiastic and a great
there is not time to simply look up She provides powerpoints that are teacher. She explains things
answers. You actually need to have helpful and online websites that thoroughly and it is very beneficial
studied in order to complete the we can look at that may benefit us. that she is from Turkey because
exam in the allotted time frame The topic is very interesting and she always explains about life in
because if you simply look up she will spend as much time Turkey related to business. She is
every answer in the book, you needed on a topic to ensure we very intelligent and provides good
wont have enough time to understand. She had us watch a course material. I would
complete the exams. The few videos on international recommend her to my classmates. Very good. The powerpoints are
questions are clearly stated and management that were relevant She answers emails quickly and helpful, reviews are good,
relevant to in-class lectures. and current and very interesting. any questions we may have. websites useful and rewarding.
Fair exams but time limit could be Content very interesting and Respectful to the different cultures Would recommend this course.
more generous. pertinent. in class. Highly recommended. The structure is very workable.
very fair and easy but covered relatively difficult course that very knwoledgable about the
topic requirews knowledge of statistics subject matter great structure i loved it
Good Good Easy Good
The structure was good. We had 3
exams, 5 pop quizzes, and a
presentation. Very good diversity.
Also, at the beginning of every
class, the instructor would open by
asking what we have heard in the
I really like this instructor. She news. We would have a 10 minute
The content of this course was a explains things in different ways to or so conversation and she would
little hard for me to understand. It accommodate different learning pull up articles from the Wall
was only after about halfway in styles. She does use power point Street Journal. This actually
the semester when I realized that presentations, however, she does sparked my interest and curiousity
it is relevant for my degree in not just read them to us like so to the point that I know watch the
Exams were fair, with some HRM/Org. Beh. After that, I many other instructors do. She world news, national news, and
difficult questions that are understood and it began to get actually presents and teaches the business news to continue my
expected at this level in college. easier for me. course. learning.
The exams are fair and cover
material covered in calss. I like the
way this instructors conducts class The course content is intersting The instructor is easy going and
and exams. and is consistent with the subject. approchable. None
She does NOT give enough time on
her exams... Her 1.2 seconds per
question is ridiculous, she should
at least give the complete class She's very nice and makes sure we
time. 11:30-12:50 understand the course work
The instructor is really nice and
helpful, if you need it. She doesn't
give a lot of work. So it is
important to do well on the
The exams in this class are fair. exams. She is pretty boring, but I
They aren't hard, but you don't would recommend her to a
receive a lot time to complete student, because she is fair. As
them. So you have to really study long as you read the chapters you
and understand the terms. will do fine.
Teacher is very fair, communicates material a little difficult, but if you
procedures and assignment pay attention and read the Great instructor, highly course structure is great. Nothing
clearly. material you can understand it recommended should change.
He seemed to be rather lazy but it
worked to both our advantage and
disadvantage as a student. Twice
we were emailed the afternoon of
class that there would be no class
that night and seeing as how it was
in Dallas it was a commute for
many students. Some of us
showed up to at least one of those
classes unknowingly. Also one of
our test grades was not given to us
in a timely fashion and often it was
hard to get a response from the
instructor in a timely manner. He
promised bonus points that aren't
apparent in the grading scheme.
And since class was canceled the
The exams covered the material week before the final a power
well and followed along with what point was not posted for the final
was taught and mentioned in the chapter as had been for all others Followed the syllabus and prof.
syllabus. during the semester. updated it as needed.
The exams are a joke, you can't get
power points in a timely manner This is a very important course to He is not a teacher and does not
to prepare a review because he my degree plan and would have belong in the classroom. We There was no structure. He mainly
never knows what he is going to liked to have gotten much more never had class the full 3 hours on covered two topics and that was
cover until he gets to class. out of the course. any week. what all the tests were over.
gives great scenarios and examples
Fair and to the point made content very interesting for understanding great stucture
This is really good profesor.
Exams are confusing, and as the
only source of a grade, it can be interesting sense of humor,
frustrating. definitely a man's man
The instructor is a good instructor,
when he is there for the whole
class period. The class before the
first exam was cancelled because
he was sick. A couple of weeks
after that, he had to leave 2 hours
early(3 hour class period) in order
to have a conference call with I feel that this class should be a
The course content was relevant, China for his day job. The week split class, meaning on a normal
however, I do not like the way the before the final he cancelled class two day schedule. It is hard to
book is presented. I think it because he was sick. Both times concentrate on law of any sort for
focuses too much on we was sick, we had exams the three hours straight. I believe that
discrimination. This course is next week and still had new some quizzes should be given to
The exams were difficult. The supposed to be about employment material to cover that was still help out the grade. We only had 3
questions were fair and covered law, and all we learned about was covered on the exam. I don't think exams and an extra credit
the material that was stated and discrimination. I feel that a that is fair to the students, when, assignment. I think quizzes do
was given in a way that different book is appropriate and in the syllabus, it stated that we help students learn and it helps
encouraged study time and more law subject matter were allowed to have only two them to keep caught up instead of
learning. incorporated into the course. absences without penalty. procrastinating.
A little difficult, the second test Good demenstrations, kept me up
was really confusing and not clear. for the class period late at night.
I like how he breaks things down
into real life situations. He explains
it at a level where everyone
Exams were fair. No comment. understands. Good.
I like this instructor but I feel this
instructor is too busy to devote
time to his students. When you
respond by email he doesn't
answer or comment to let you
know that he has received your
email. The syllabus states that we
are responsible to communicate
The examinations are difficult The course content is relevant for with him concerning any issue but
because there seems to be a lot of this class and for the business I don't feel that is shown back The course structure is fair or
tricky questions which is confusing. world. towards his students. okay.
Great Professor! I would highly
recommend another peer to take a
course taught by him.
Well structured and good content.
I feel weekly assignments are
redundant and time consuming. I
did not like traveling from Denton
Demonstrates command over to South Dallas for this class. More
subject matter and good delivery sections of this class should be
Moderately difficult. Fair in Well structured material and very of information and knowledge. offered at Denton and online so
content and number relevant to course Accommodating to student needs. that students can avoid travel.
This instructor knew nothing about
Blackboard or about how to
conduct an online class. The tests
were taken from a test bank but The instructor was nice but
she did not know how to post it on showed no knowledge of being an
Blackboard. We had to download We did not really do much in this academic. She's is an adjunct and
the multiple choice/true/false test, course. We had chapters to read it showed. She was unprepared,
do it, and email it to her. This was but there was no discussion. did not know Blackboard, and did
a joke. Instructor took too long in Instructor posted some questions not know the course content. She
grading tests back and made on Blackboard but few answered. just read the textbook It would have been nice to have
promises to post grades and never These had no impact on grades so powerpoints to us when we met the course go as it was written in
did. people did not do them. face-to-face. the course syllabus.
The professor was not clear in
giving direction related to course
assignments and dates, nor was
she available to clarify any
questiong pertaining to the
confusion. On several occasions,
she would promise to post
assignments, grades, or
announcements online, but failed
to do so. Overall, I do not think
Professor Smallwood was
prepared enough to instruct this
class. There was too much stress
involved in this class.
She was very hard to get in contact
Content was relevent as well as with. Considering we only meet 4
the subject matter but the times in the semester and the rest
Examinations were fair and presentation was not creative. of the time is spent online, The structure was okay with
enough time was alloted. Only readings and slides. communication is very important. papers and exams.
The course content was very
interesting regarding how The structure of the class was
corporations conduct business. appropriately outlined. The
The subject of the course was classroom assignments were very
thought provoking on varies The instructor was very interesting. The group projects
The examination were within the chapter in the text. Specifically knowledgeable in the subject assigned allowed the student to
text of the course. The exams how corporations view their own matter. She allow the class to think develop the chapters, which
foster new learnin tools in industry and its relationship with outside the box of the course assisted in learning the subject of
retaining information. thier target markets. syllabus. the course.
Ambigiuous questions, very Course content is not the expected Maybe there was a disconnect
random questions; difficulty level connection to real life scenarios in being new to the school system, Course structure beyond
was medium. Number of current national and local news. but there was a lot of technology independent reading did not
questions on exam and number of The course is relevant, but the issues from posting and submitting appear to be a graduate level
exams are fair; however, grading is content,approach and assignments to lack of class. The classroom/online mix
inconsistent among classmates. organization can be improved. communication for several days. did not seem effeciently utilized.
The course structure was very
unfavorable. We had two weeks
without no activity at a time and
then in the course of 7 days, we
had to post on the discussion, take
an exam, and write a lengthy
paper. This makes no sense!!! Dr.
Smallwood tried to rearrange
some assignments to give us more
time but in the end, this was even
more confusing!! This was the first
class EVER that I clearly had no
clue exactly what was required
from specific assignments. Please
rearrange the course so that major
assignments are not all due in one
week and minimize changes to
assignments and guidelines during
the semester because it is very
confusing!! Very important: The
Dr. Smallwood, being an adjunct, instructor of this class was
did her best to be available changed last minute and no
Exams were from the publisher. through BlackBoard, provided cell students were notified of the
UNT, if it aspires to gain better phone, etc. Sometimes, however, change. Most classmates and I
status, should NOT use publisher's she was absent for a full week but enrolled in order to take the class
test!! I have taken classes on usually, she provided updates on with Dr. Altman because she had
assessment and test creation and The course should be mandatory! when assignments will be graded excellent reviews. I tried to call
none of the good principles were The book is quite decent, full of and such. Overall, Dr. Smallwood is UNT Dallas and get a hold of
observed with these exams. I cases that question ethics from experienced and brings a someone there to find out who the
refuse to care about any exam that every perspective! However, the corporate perspective but I do not instructor was and to
asks me for percentages of people class was too dragged out and our favor instructors who read communicate a message to
that believe this and that. Who in person meetings were boring, to students PowerPoints. I can do him/her of my absence at our first
cares to know about that say the least. Please redo the that myself :) I do believe the issue class meeting due to other
anyways? The instructor should course so that PPTs and such are here is bigger than the instructor: obligations. Try calling to see if you
redo the exams and incorporate reviewed before the class and it is the system, the school, the can go through at all!!! First of all,
topics on what was discussed in hands-on activities happen in department, etc. that confines UNT Dallas, the System, or
class. class. adjuncts. whoever, has the responsibility to
Great course structure; hybrid
Exams were not clear cut; Course content relevant to current taught with four meeting dates all
true/false answers were not trends of public policy, Instructor great, full of energy, and of which were scheduled for
always accurate. government, and social demands. knowledgeable of the industry. Saturdays. Allowed flexibility.
The web-based portion of the
course was non-existant -- the
material was limited to text ppt
She ran a great classroom -- slides and discussion boards which
encouraged discussion and weren't required (so no one
collaboration and was very posted). Also, the assignments
entertaining. She was never would close before or not be
prepared, it seemed, on the opened until after the due dates.
material -- she read the slides and The 50% web/50% classroom did
wasn't able to explain the material not work for this class as
Contained duplicate questions, This was a purely business ethics very well. I think Dr. Smallwood structured. The classroom portion
sometimes vague questions. Were course, which I will have to repeat would excel at a class that meets would have been better served
open book, open notes with no when I take BUSI 5200. Based on in a classroom weekly, especially if with case analyisis, group
time limit. Were not given the course description, I was she were able to bring current presentations throughout the
according to schedule presented at hoping for it to cover actual policy material to each class for semester, and no chapter
the beginning of the semester. development and trends. discussion. lectures!!
She knows what she is doing.
Very attention to detail. Need to Marketing is her passion as to
know the material very well. was given very well. what I learned
She is very knowledgeable and
enthusiastic. Definitely the best
professor I have had in my classes
at UNT Dallas.
The exams were challenging but
fair.
She is very charasmatic and you
The exams are thought The instructor uses all materials can see she enjoys teaching. Her
provocative which make you and realtes them to the demeanor is such that makes
develop your critical thinking skills. requirements of the class. learning fun. Course structure is good.
Great instructor would definitely
recommend to another person,
Great, challenging but lets you wish to have her for more classes
learn in future
Didn't really use the textbook.
Much of the course was over in
Exams covered what was covered class discussions, PowerPoint from LOVE the instructor. Enthusiastic
in class. made me happy to know the book (that were altered by the about the course; encouraged our
that it wasn't some out of the air instructor in to easier to enthusiasm. Used current relevant
questions as some times comprehend slides), and role topics to explain terms and
instructors like to do. playing activities in class. practices. n/a
She is an great teacher, prepares
for her class, very knowledgeable
Difficult but manageable All information was relevant and enthusiastic about the class good sourse structure
Very point to detail and cover A lot of work but very useful due Very informative. Knows her
everything that was given to study. to it being real life situations material It was given very well.
Perhaps it might be interesting to
add a group project in which sales
The presentations we were teams have to make a B2B
The exams were very difficult, required to do helped us learn to Dr. Serviere is extremely presentation to a client. That
espcially the application questions. present to an audience and learn enthusiastic when she lectures, would bring in a different aspect
Three exams were the right from each other. The feedback which makes the course on how to sell and a different type
amount. from Dr. Serviere was very helpful. interesting. She is also very fair. of client.
Dr. Serviere is a FABULOUS
teacher...she has so much passion
for teaching this class! She is very
knowledgeable about her class
Marketing" being taught. I would
definitely take a class that she has
to offer in the future. She keeps it
very interesting and needless to
GREAT! Great! say "on your toes"!" Great!
The exams used a lot of scenarios,
and I think there could have been Great teacher, lots of passion. I
more definitions and clearly stated learned a lot in her class, and
questions since the book and when I missed a few classes (even
powerpoints are more straight- while reading the book) my test 2
forward. Very relatable and useful class. grade suffered. Structured well.
excellent
This is a class where it was
required to purchase the book, but She is very fair and seems
really there isn't a need as her concerned with the development It was very good. She has done an
The tests seem to be fairly clear. lectures do a much better job than of the students to be successful excellent job of conveying the
The information is covered pretty the book of explaining the professionals onces they leave the material in a way that everyone
well during her lectures. material. university. can understand.
Dr. Serviere-Munoz challenged
students to learn the material and Dr. Serviere-Munoz introduced Dr. Serviere-Munoz connects well
be able to apply concepts content and subject matter with students. I am really
introduced in class by giving fair students in the business field disappointed to see she is not
tests. would identify in the real-world". " teaching evenings Spring 2011.
she is prepared for everything she it was a good structure because
it was hard but she helps us a lot it was a good teaching course was asked we knew what to do
The examination were difficult but The instructor comanded respect
fair and true to the course. The subject matter was clear. and maintained it. The structure was great.
The instructor is very informative,
she also stays on topic and
remains enthusiastic about the
course. She has keeps your
The exams are difficult, however it attention and engages you in the
depends on how much work you conversation to keep you involved
put into studying and coming to and to make sure you retain and Course Structure is good for this
class. are able to apply the knowledge. class.
Their was a few instances where
the prof called upon certain
students of their deficiencies in
fornt of the entire class, which in
my opinion is not ethical and
should be corrected by having the
prof discuss student performance
Well Designed course. with students not the entire class.
Content is a little redundant, but
then again it is in all of my courses. She is very understanding, and
Subject matter is fulfilling. cares about her students success. The structure of the course is
Difficulty level, the test are hard relevance is in tact with today's She is demanding of bringing out understandable, though it is
but fair. Conceptual questions. times. the best people have to offer. unconventional.
I like the course structure. I like
how we had to do sales
presentations in front of the class.
The exams are fairly difficult,but Anytime you can do something
are definitely passable if you study I beleve this course is very relevant Dr. Serviere was very personable hands on, I think you are more
the required material and come to for anyone whether they are going and seemed to be very passionate likely to benefit from it and take it
lectures. into business or not. about what she was teaching. with you.
Dr. Laura Serviere-Munoz is well
The exams were fair in that some The course content provided was versed in the concepts of
of the questions you had to really thorough in the forms of visual marketing. I would recommned
think about the correct answer aids provided on the white board her to some of my other
because some of the answers ,course book ,and power point classmates that have not taken The course structure is well
provided were almost identical. presentations. one of her courses. organized and easy to follow.
I loved the instructor! Her
enthusiam for her field is
contagious. It is refreshing to have
an instructor that is exciting about
what they are teaching. It's not
only tiring when professors
The course was interesting to me, constantly warn about what real"
however at times the material world is like, it's offensive to
I liked that the tests were seemed repetitive, similar and suggest that because I'm a I would have appreciated some
straightforward and came from slightly confusing when trying to student, I've never worked before. smaller" graded assignments to
information lectured from the differentiate one subject from I loved Dr. Serviere's consistently help boost my overall average
book. another. positive attitude!" from the test grades."
Tricky questions. Hard to understand.
The content was explained very
They were a little difficult but fair. well to the last minute. Instructor knows her materials. Structure was very organized.
She is a very good instructor and
very knowledgable about the
Her exams are well put-together subject. She makes you think
and cover the material discussed outside the box and is enthusiastic
in class. Good info, very interesting. about the subject. Very good.
I really enjoy being in this class, my
teacher was one of the most
prepared, talented, well spoken
teacher i have ever had.
The instructor is a great professor,
The Examinations in this course The course content was very I will recommend her to other The course structure was well
were fair. helpful. students. organized and understanding.
I really apreciated the effort of my
instructor, she made this class so
interesting and I learned a lot from
her.
I feel the exam is difficult because
you have to remember all the
definitions. She is a good instructor.
She is elaborates on her
explanations in a clear concise The course is well developed for
Exams are straight forward. Course content is well defined. manner. the course itself
The first exam was fairly easy. The She has her class favorites, with
second exam was extremly whom she doesn't apply the class I think the course could be a
difficult. The third exam was rules to. She does not treat the hybrid, where it meets mostly
extremly easy. students equally. online.
It was helpful for me in order to
It wasn't that difficult. Easy to The content of this course was She was good. I understood what understand some Marketing
understand. helpful. she was trying to deliver. concepts.
She is an amazing teacher and is
apparant she LOVES marketing!!!!
Test are pretty difficult. In a way
tricky the way the context is used. Very interesting considering the Talk a lot from the book, will be
But they are fair, all that needs to fact that it is everyday life issues more helpful if lessons are taught
be is study. that are taught in this course with more real life issues. The course structure is fine.
I've noticed that almost all (if not
all) courses have gone to a
powerpoint presentation format.
Some instructors are able to still
bring life to the content, while for
others its simply reading material
from a screen that could very
easily be read at home. What
students require is real-life,
applicable experience presented
Its obvious that she is passionate along WITH theories and concepts.
about this topic, and works to I am grateful that at least in this
provide examples to explain topics course the instructor was able to
clearly. do so.
Has a project worth almost half of
They are a little difficult but the entire class grade, which Great instructor to talk to and Could be a little different and put
understandable sounds ridiculous understand more time for other things
The course gives good foundation
of marketing. Learning the basis
She is very enthusiastic on the and understanding the whole
The class was fair. class, keeps the class awake. picture.
The only problem I have is
understanding her through her
thick accent. I think she is a great
I think the exams are particularly professor and is passionate about
difficult to gauge. One time I took what she teaches. She tells jokes
the first exam and I thought I did in the class but sometimes we
really well and I didn't do so well. I don't get them because of her
studied a lot but I am sure I just accent, but she is very nice and
studied the wrong thing. They you can approach her about I think everything is fine except
seem to be good in number I believe that the content is very anything. Keep her around and let maybe only 2 or 3 tests instead of
though but the fairness is kind of a relevant and should be her grow and I am sure her English four due to the length of chapters
stretch. emphasized in today's society. will get better! and number she covers.
Fair level of difficulty. Relevant and covers the topics well She is the best for the subject
The content of the course is good
test and notes and very
importantly it gave the
opportunity to experiences and She is a very friendly instructor,
Her tests were fair and easy very learn how to make a marketing fair with the grading and knows
similar to the notes she provided plan. It allow me to experiences the material and show to be
and the powerpoints. what marketing is all about. enthusmatic about the subject.
Her exams were exactly as she Hands down one of my favorite
said, gave the perfect study guide teachers I've ever had Perfect! I wouldn't change a thing
I like her teaching style very much.
She uses real life examples and
The exams are fair and if you study She explains the material well and makes every effort to make the
for them you will be able to pass you can tell she is passionate subject matter clear and
no problem. about the subject. understandable.
The instructor can go on and on
about the material, which is
Exams are not very difficult if you sometimes be boring. But I would
read the material and study what have to say that she shows a I like the structure of the course.
was presented in class and the passion for it and whats students The chapters were order and
powerpoints. Overall I think the to learn and understand the helped with the group project
exams were fair. n/a material. assigned.
Throughly explained, Professor
always made sure students knew
what materials each test would I waited until my last semester to
cover. This is the only class I have take this class because I did not
ever taken where the Professor think it would be something I
gives a quick turn around on test All materials presented were enjoyed. The professor made it
results. Thats a positive point. related to the course. Excellent Professor really interesting.
Instructor is very excited about her
subject and has command of it.
She does talk to fast at times
which makes her accent difficult to
Exams are difficult in that they Course content covers the understand but she doesn't mind
make you think and memorize. important structure of marketing repeating herself. Course structure is appropriate.
Very basic, exactly what I expected Very enthusiastic and knows the
Fair for an introductory course subject very well. Perfect
She can be more helpful with info
easy if you study everything was relevant for projects. structured well
everything she taught was relevant she was very good... too bad she
to the course & helped me really cant be my instructor for every
understand some of why people other class i have. she actually
i loved them because they were do the things they do. this course breaks the material down to a
FLUID exams which actually helped even helped me discover the name level that even my 5yr old would
me to understand the information for the disorder i have (OCD) understand i loved it
The exams was fair and we was
well prepared.
This instructor is amazing, she
makes learning fun. She jokes
around with the students and that
The exams in this class challenged promotes a good learning
me. When I first entered this class See taught to the material and environment in my opinion. I
I thought that I was not going to explained it to where we would certainly would recommend her to
do very well because I did not understand it and that made it a future student, they would
think that I would understand this easier for me to understand. I am greatly benefit from her
subject very well. I was wrong. I amazed with myself for doing so classroom. She is an awesome I just enjoyed the class and all of
am doing good. well in this class. professor. the students that were in there.
She was funny, knowledgeable,
and friendly. She was available in
She does a great justification for whatever form of communication
this topic with her teaching. The and she does a great justification
The class was difficult, but on a content was filled with information for the subject of psychology. I am
level that was achievable and that and what she taught was directly very pleased with this course and
stimulated your mind rather than relevant to what we should learn highly recommend it to future
overwhelm you with information in an introductory psychology psychology students. I wish she
that was too extreme to course. Furthermore, because of was able to teach more courses in
understand. She was very fair with her professional teaching, I now psychology. Considering some of
the grades and straight forward feel comfortable taking more the other professors methods of The course structure was relevant
with how the class was going to be advanced classes because I feel teaching, she is among the best and organized making it easy to
run and what she expected out of like I have a broad knowledge-base and was by far the best professor I learn and follow throughout the
the students. on general information. had this semester. semester.
The material on the exams was the
exact same material the instructor
went over in class, which in other
classes never seems to be the
case. Good job!
Not my subject at all which Awesome instructor very Very nice, liked attending class,
Difficult but fair. probably made it difficult. knowledgeable and very fair. liked the lecture.
The instructor is very
knowledgable about this course
The exams covered material that The course content covered and what is required to get This course could have been
was taught in class and was subjects that were specific to this students involved in learning the taught online instead of in a
relavent to the course class material lecture.
This psychology class is great for
getting a general understanding of Dr. Manning is a friendly, fair
various parts of psychology, instructor. Her way of leading a
including mental illnesses, the classroom is ideal for students who
There were several examination history of, and various generally have other things they
sections, compiled into a few, psychological theories. Most want to do, interest in the subject
thorough exams. The exams are relevant to many people are the not withstanding. Dr. Manning is
both detail and topic oriented, illnesses themselves, which are good at keeping students
questioning specifics and gone over as a separate section interested, even if they come away
understanding of the topic as a devoted to their causes, not quite sure, in which case she I have no tangible comments
whole. symptoms, and treatment answers questions clearly. regarding course structure
I enjoy learning from this
The reviews are a bit professor. She is obviously very
overwhelming. There are 3 knowledgeable in her field and I
columns of key words and like a professor that is actually
sometimes you don't really know passionate about what she teaches
what about that word you need to as oppose to just teaching out of a
know. Course content is good. book. Course structure is good.
Dreadful! I had to force myself to
come to this class. She covered
way too much information and
expected us to know everything
Very difficult exams. Expected to that came out of her mouth for the
know way too much information Interested in the course content, exams. Students expressed their
for exams. Review was 7 pages but this professor made me hate concerns and how overwhelmed
long. it. they were, but she ignored us.
The instructor encourages the
individual to learn for the sake of
learning but does not like lazy
disrespectful students. She works
with students regarding questions
pertaining to class and problems
outside of the class. She invites
students to explore contemporary
issues and develop ideas on those
while using current content
Examinations required hypo- Course content was interesting learned in her class. She challenges
deductive reasoning and the and stimulating. The class was students, so students have to be
understanding of materials three hours and that wore on me alert and expect to work.
language presented in different after the first two hours. During However, she does not have a
ways. I would recommend that time, I learned many new heavy workload but a moderate
students understanding ideas pertaining to the subject, we one that requires extra hours of
introduction to psychology before related this to the real world as studying. I have enjoyed Madeline Course structure was easy to
signing up for this class. well. Rex-Lear and her class. follow.
very reasonable. i like this class. i like the instructor very much. very reasonable.
She did an excellent job presenting
the material and engaging the
class. I thoroughly enjoyed how
knowledgeable she was regarding
The material presented in class Very relevant to course the material. She is very capable
matches the material tested. description. and I appreciate that. good
I think she could be a cool teacher,
she just didn't seem like she
wanted to be there. It is a late
course, and everyone is tired but I
didn't get any motivation from
her. She didn't seem passionate
about the material she was
teaching us, or reiterate the value
Boring, but interesting if that this class could have on us in the
makes sense. It just seemed liked future. My own personal opinion is
Hard, very hard...way too much the content went on and on and that Dr. Rex-Lear is possibly not
information its like studying for a on. We would look at 70 slides and used to teaching this age range of
final, then 11 pre-class tests on top 4 different videos in one class. All students. I mean, there are alot of
of that, a little excessive. I do of these subjects are interesting, older students at UNTD and we
however feel that your grading all subject to be on the quizzes a have a real desire for learning, and
was very fair. It seemed as though week later, so it ran on like 4 some of us are teachers ourselves.
you were a little taken back by the months of test mode. We never I feel this class could have been
low grades on the first exam, but really talked about how these made fun if she wasn't has The grading was way too hard to
you really didn't change anything matters are addressed in concerned about covering tons of keep up with, the grades were all
in your teaching techniques. I psychology at all. Never. It was like material, and instead used over the place, it seemed
usually do good on tests, I was taking a biology class. The only interactive techniques to allow us unorganized and confusing Im still
very discouraged by the grades I psychology I saw was that the to really understand the material not sure what grade I have.
got in your class, they did not questions on the test, out of the she taught. Like first hour and a Blackboard helps to structure this
reflect the type of student I am, 100 different terms, theories, half teach from slides, then next and it wasn't used. I need to be
and I study. But you were fair in definitions and experiments, none hour and a half, split us in groups, able to access my grades when I
the grading, you helped us by of them were the same as they give us scenarios, let us brain want to see them so I will know
giving extra credit, curves, etc. were explained, they were like storm ideas and ways to apply the what I am getting, and how I am
Thanks trick questions. material. doing.
Instuctor knew what she was
Exam are fair and cover the Content went along with the talking about and covered material
content that she discussed. course. well. Structure was good
In all fairness, this is a
developmental psychology class.
I'm not sure what more she could
do to make assignments more
stimulating, engaging, or creativity-
The professor could be a little inducing, but I think she does an
more helpful in helping the excellent job with the
students prepare adequately for presentation. She's clearly
examinations. The study guides" passionate about the subject, and
are very broad and basically that in itself is inspiring at times.
include all material discussed in Course content is relevant to She's straighforward but still
class." course. pleasant. Typical lecture class.
I really enjoyed this instructor.
good good good good
Too broad of a time span to fit
detailed explanations of a deep
First one was really hard. topic. Great attitude. Made learning fun!
Good structure, would change
Good teacher, interesting class time from 6-9, 10pm is SO
Loved the videos, especially the assigments and lectures. Would LATE!. Wish we had reviews that
fetal development video. Videos love to take another course with were less vague. Like specific
She is very fair in her grading. are VERY relevant and interesting. her. questions.
The instructor always made sure The instructor used tools found She is a great instructor with
to review before a test and send a outside of the classroom to explain normal expectations. I would take
review by email. the content any course she taught. I was very comfortable with it.
Wording on test could be more
clearly explained. Great content. Intelligent and knowledgeable n
Very nice and well educated. Great
Tough considering a night class. Very in depth teacher. Showed compassion. Tough in a night class
NA Na NA Na
This are overall pretty fair, but can
be difficult because to curve is
given. She drops one test so it
makes up for it but still only 2 test
the whole semester is rather She is very nice and easy to
challenging. understand
Mr. Terrell is knowledgeable and
creates an atmosphere for
Course content is relevant to the students to share their ideas and
course. comments.
GREAT PERSON BEST INSTRUCTOR
I HAVE EVER ENCOUNTERED HE
RELEVANT TO ME AS A BUSINESS TAUGHT LOTS ABOUT REAL
FAIR MAJOR ESTATE AND MUCH MORE VERY SIMPLE AND CONVENIENT
This course was very fair...it The instructor was very
teaches the basics about real The content provided was relevant knowledgeable about his teaching
estate and the awareness of to what the course was and his and a very energetic professor.
purchasing and selling a home. teaching. Never boring. The structure was very good.
This is a very relevant course to
everyone because it teaches many
things that will help people in the
future pertaining to real estate. Mr. Terrell is a great resource
Most people will be signing a lease when it comes to real estate and if
This was a very informative class or buying a house at some time in he can't legally tell you the answer
that was not at all difficult. I do their life and this teaches the to your personal real estate
believe it did it's purpose to teach rights and responsibilities related question, he will refer you to
about the principles of real estate. to this part of life. someone who can answer.
I would highly recommend
Dr.Coleman-Mason to all of my
friends, and family members, she
made our class very
interesting,and we looked forward
to coming to her class every week.
Dr. Coleman-Mason is vry
professional and she demonstrates
her knowledge of the information
She is a very good professor. she teaches in the class.
The instructor cares for each and
fairness and demands to show all of her students and no one gets
what we learned in our studies very easy to follow and well left behind in learning the course The structure was very caring and
from hands on work. meaning to the course studies. of studies. wanting to learn
Great instructor, she made this
course very interesting and I have
learned many wonderful skills that The course structure was great, it
Exam were fair. Material was relevant to course. I will implement in my life. helped learn the material properly.
Dr. Coleman is excellent. She gives
each student equal attention and
Examinations were perfect and truly empowers them in positive
realted to our coarse feedback. It flowed very well!
The course content was interesting I appreciate the educational and
I believe the exams were fair and and ideal as a foundation for those practical experience the instructor I had no problems with the way
engaging. who aspire to become counselors. brings to the classroom. the course was structured.
fair
The structure of the course was
understanding for my chossen
Kinda difficult Great I liked her. field of study.
Very challenging. Great instructor who loves her job.
dr c m is an amazing instructor. i
look forward to taking her class's
when i get the chance. if it weren't
for her i'd probably have switched the course structure was right on.
the exams were all right on. the course content was right on. colleges by now. it was perfect.
Very easy to talk with. Is willing to
Fair in number and length. explain all questions.
very good intructir respecfull to
very good exams, understandable very good course and interesting stundents and understanable. very Good
The course contents are related to I am very impressed with The structure of the class is very
The exams are fair. the course. instructor. She knows her subject. satisfactory.
Exams are fair Very relevant to the course
The instructor is very caring for all
of her students, there is no
different treatment towards any
the class was lively at all times, one individual, all of us love our
fairness in examination prepared each student participated in class instructor and she wants to see all The class is very well put together
ways so students can recall and work, no student was left out or of her students learn the course's and keeps busy in learning all
pass course. not noticed for their efforts. subject. things about the subject matter.
Pretty good Interesting Good instructor Pretty good
This course was case management Dr. Lacy is a very good instructor
and it was a very good course. The and a caring person, especially
The exam was fair. The reading applications that involves case when it comes down to education.
and the review along with he class management was explain very well She makes her self available and
discussion helped prepare me for and the instructor was very she always answer your questions
the exam. knowledgeable of the subject. and explain things to you. The class was well structure
Not to difficult. It relates to Case Management I love her! Trying
At times there can be a lack of
respect in the classroom. I do not
think that it is intentional but it
was noticed that certain students There were many times where
would always be referred to by things became confusing such as
their first names, and some only as due dates, requirements for
Mr. or Ms _____ (last name). assignments, etc.
I actually like this instructor, but
she can be very stress inducing
because she does not always give
clear instructions on what is to be
done and when it is to be done.
She had the previous semester's
assignments still on Blackboard so
the due dates were all wrong and
we were not to do all of the
assignments and it was never
clear. Assignments were not
named the same thing on
She does not really give you an Blackboard as on the syllabus so it See above. I just wish she would
idea of what may be on the exam, I find the course content very was very confusing and hard to be more clear on what is due and
or even if you will have one or not. interesting and relevant. follow. when.
The exams are a little harder than there is alot of information to She is a good instructor but gives more details about how to certain
in most classes learn in the short semester. alot of homework. assignments before they are due.
very will needed if a person is very knowledgeable about the
somewhat easy going into the field of work field of work great
She could do a better job of
maintaining blackboard
assignment dates accurate. It
Fair, appropriate to materials Boring, but necessary for the causes unnecessary stress and
given. field/. frustration. Good
The instructor for this course was a
magnificent instructor. He took
the time to make sure all students
had a thorough understanding of
Examinations for this course were The course content and subject what was required and the The structure of this course was
very fair. They assessed matter of this course was very material to be learned. He also laid out very well. It was designed
knowledge of everything that the informative, interesting, and made the course a very wonderful for students to get the most out of
instructor taught. enlightening. learning experience. it.
A little bit too many chapters
together on the test,but overall
good Very Good Very Good instructor Very needed
Dr. Gomez is a great instructor. Very well planned out course.
Not only does he teach to my level Lectures and reading went well
The course was taught perfectly. I This is an excellent course that will he has helped to elevate and together. I felt the amount of
felt that I learned a lot. It wasn't lay a solid foundation for me as I enhance my thinking skills at the material was just perfect enought
over my head but it was still prepare to take on more difficult same time. I can't wait to take to educate me properly and
challenging and I feel that it courses. I feel that because I took more of his classes. I feel that he stimulate enough curiosity to
prepared me for the next level in this course the upper level courses has a lot to offer me, and that he is make me seek out even more
my education. will be easier. a true assest to this university. information than was required.
difficult but fair good and relevant Very good instructor. Very good.
test are difficult but fair comprehensive Instructor is very knowledgeable n
the course content was relevant
the exams were fair for the course i realy enjoyed the class
I was very interested in the
material covered in this course and
know that I will be able to use
Exams were fair and not too information learned in future Amazing instructor that made
difficult. events. lectures enjoyable. Course structure was excellent.
solid, clear
The instructor was great,
magnificent, and wonderful. He
did a great job on helping students
to understand the content of the The structure of this course was
Course content was very course and taught not only from a very well laid out. It's agenda was
Exams were very fair and covered informative. I learned a lot theoretical perspective but from a helpful in assuring my complete
exactly what the instructor taught. because of the type of course this reality perspective as well. understanding of the material to
Difficulty level was not extreme. was. Excellent instructor. be learned.
I wasn't very interested in the Dr. Gomez in an excellent
subject matter originally but Dr. instructor! Regretfully, this is my He handled the class very well.
Gomez is so passionate about the first and last time taking him. I There was a few instances where a
subject and course content you wish I had taken one of his courses couple students would go off on a
The exams in this course were can't help but to get involved and sooner. He is passionate, tangent and he would politely and
challenging and I like the structure interested in the content. He interested in, and dedicated to respectfully bring the discussion
of these types of exams. They showed some really good videos teaching his students the course back to him. He was always
address both testing styles, that gave us a hands on" look at content. He is definetly a prepared, organized, and ready to
multiple choice and short answer. some of the issues." challenging instructor. go.
Exams were fair. COntent was relevent. Allow more time for discussion.
The course content covered
substance use and addiction
relative to how a person is
affected psychologically,
There are a total of three exams physiologically, biologically and
required for this course and we socially. In addition, the course
have taken two so far. The exams content covered treatment Instructor is knowledgeable and Would have preferred to be given
cover a lot of material, however, I programs, laws, government brings practical experience to the an exam every week as opposed to
believe they are fair. policies and procedures. classroom. just three during the semester.
Good old fashion teacher with
This was not to difficult but power points and the good thing is
sometimes you dont know what to that the teacher tryed to make the
expect on the test. class as interesting as possible.
The exams were ok. Some times
the true/false questions were
difficult because of the wording
and wish didn't have so many The course content and subject Dr Gomez is a good instructor. He
essay questions but the test were matter was pretty good. No is fair,understanding, and makes
fair. complaints. his classes fun. No complaints.
The study guides were very Instructor offered lost of insight
helpful. True or false were a bit about the material, and gave
tricky. Questions were relevant to examples about his own work on
course content and material This course covered material that the field that were relevant to the instructor followed the
covered. was relevant to the class. class. syllabus and stayed on track.
I believe these exams were most
certainly fair and adequately I was very intrigued by everything
difficult. I'm sure that each covered in this course. I learned
instructor might adjust their tests many new facts and ideas and
according to how they feel the even came to solidify some of my
class will perform. The instructor own beliefs in the course of
made sure to cover all relevant learning. I believe this course to I would highly recommend this
material prior to testing and even be relevant in today's society and instructor to anyone taking
gave out a review sheet (nothing I although not going into this field of courses at UNT Dallas. I found him Truly thought the structure was
ever received when attending UNT study, I know I will be able to to be very interesting and enjoyed excellent...can't think of ways to
years ago..haha) utilise information learned. lectures. improve.
Dry humor but I really enjoyed I really wish received more points
well I like taking his class for the paper!!
I was so glad that I had the
opportunity to take this professor.
He practices this and it is always
more meaningful from someone
that actually has applied
knowledge.
The students were organized to
have a chapter and then present it
to the class. It was disastrous. No
We only had one mid term and it one ever paid attention. Most of
was ridiculous. I liked the style of the material the students would
the test questions but it was a spend time presenting on was
group discussion test and I did the completely irrelevant to what the
entire thing because my other test course was about. It was He was far too busy focusing on
mates were completely painstakingly boring sitting getting his doctorate than trying to Get an actual teacher who tries to
inadequate in the material. through class every week. actually teach this class. teach the material
The structure was warm, caring
The instructor was very warm and a very good learning
fairness and encouraged to I enjoyed the course was very towards all of students and wants environment. The instructor wants
remember and learn what was interesting and was on target for to see each of the students to all students to learn and gave
taught by hands on experience. the studies. learn. opportunity to develop in this way.
Professor Ortiz is another
instructor whom I appreciate the
Examinations were fair relevant to educational and practical
actually being a substance abuse Course content was relevant and experience that he brings to the
counselor. appropriate. classroom. The course content was fine.
Easy to communicate with,
comprehensive interesting respectful and knowledgeable. n
Professor Ortiz is an amazing
teacher!! This is the second time I
have taken his class, the first one
was online. He is as great of a
teacher in class as he is online! I
will be taking him again during
winter mester!
excellent excellent excellent excellent
Good,teacher, down to earth,
Assignment were fair and not All materials were relavant to relates to the real world not just
difficult. course. text book senarios. Good Structure.
neutral
Good structure loved the group
the book for this class was very Love her. she really knows her discussion both in class and on
thorough and relavant to subject stuff and is a wealth of information blackboard
Mrs.Jackson is a awesome
professor, I really enjoyed her class
this semester!!
The instructor did not use the
syllabus as a tool for class
structure and often did not know
from one week to the next what
was supposed to be accomplished.
She had no control of class
The instructor was unaware that discutions and also tried to give
there was trouble with many of personal council to the students
the student being unable to use on their families problems with
computers from their homes even The content of the course was out recomending that the student
after she was told. The use of taught by the students with vere see a counclior who was not the
UTube was over stated as a little input from the instructor, the instructor which took away from
teaching tool and exams were not use of powerpoint by the students valuable class time. She sat at the
clearly explained prior to due left each studennt giving their own back of the class room and listened
dates Also they were not given on impression of what was important to the power points and took no
the dates established on the to know and how to use the notes, She had said at the begining
syllabus causing confusion as to material. Many of the powerpoints of class that she did not like to
when to be in class or at the were exceedingly boring and some lecture, and also that the class
computer lab whiched closed at were so bad that the script on the would be devided into groups for
10pm and I got caught in the dark slides were unreadable and many prodjects and these never
in the lab on short notice for the of the students read straight from happened. She had no personal
mid-term and was unable to the slide with no real knowledge of structure for the course and it
complete it. what they were teaching. showed. There was none.
very easy to communicate and
respect acknowledging all students
fairness, and well thought out with very good and knowledgeable on understood course the same as very good atmosphere and learn
students days before given. the course contents. well. environment
The istructor was very unclear Dr.Jackson didn't teach us
when it came to the assignments anything. Most students in the
and when a student asked her class chose a chapter out of the
about the assignment, she would book to due a presentation on
I don't know if I liked the course just say its in the syallabus. She while Dr. Jackson sat at the back of
content because I learned nothing didn't respond to e-mails. I feel like the classroom all semester. She
There were no formal exams in in this class due to the instructor I wasted my time and $800 in this did not get up and lecture all
this class. We did case evaluations. and structure of the class. class. semester.
I appreciate the practical
experience Professor Jackson
brought to the classroom. I
appreciate her emphasis on
developing students presentation
skills to prepare students to
The exams were fair and related to The course content was relevant effectively interact with persons in I had no problems with the course
real life on the job situations. and appropriate. this field. structure.
The subject matter and course
content was very relevant to this
i found this course to be course and the profession I plan to I thought the Instructor was I throughly enjoyed the way the
challanging but not to difficult. enter into. excellent. course was structured.
This course content was great and Dr. Jackson is a great professor The structure of the course was
The examinations were difficulty. very relevant. and I love her teaching style. very good.
Exams are moderate. Instructor
describe what material would be The course content of the course
in exams. Bonus point are giving in focus in sociology perspective.
each exam. Exam questions come During the semester we focus one
from book reading and class three main sociologist to explain
lectures base on sociologists. sociologist questions.
I like Dr. Forde as a person outside
of the classroom. He is a very
intelligent individual and has a
great deal of knowledge, but he
does not know how to relate to his The only thing that was consistent
The course content is interesting students. He expect you to in this course was the textbook
but it is instructed in a way that understand and grasp the material readings. We started out doing
The exam are quirky and makes it hard to fully get involved as he does but that just simply is one thing and then the next we
unbalanced. with. not the case. were doing something else.
Dr. Forde is a out going instructor,
when you need help with anything
exams where easy they pertain to the course content went hand and he is welling to listening and help the course structure is structured
the subjects we study hand with the subject matter out well, with the class and subject.
The content covered in this course
seemed a little restricted. I think
he should have relied a little more
on the text book rather than just
The difficulty was not extreme, the strictly opinions so that we would
assignments were doable and the have had a stronger base for
tests were possible to pass. He was future sociology courses. It didn't
fair as far as attendance and really INTRODUCE the class to
equality around the classroom. sociology. He was funny, fair, and educated.
He tends to stick to one central
idea and tries to base everything
off those main ideas. He should
Course content for this class is include more or include bigger
Exams for this class are challenging interesting and the instructor details pertaining to those It is an overall good required
without being too hard. makes it easy to understand. theorist. course to take.
Dr. Forde is very straight forward. Being new to sociology this
Is able to discuss any issue and semester... it was a pleasure to
place reason for sociological have encounter with an intro soci
very concise with the subject viewpoint with it. really help to class taught in such a low key
straight to the point of material matter. Able to relate course broaden your mind to be creative manner... really helped to tie the
covered in lecture content with everyday issues. in your thought process. theories and concepts together
In Dr. Forde's Sociology class, I feel Dr. Forde is strict. I was 15 minutes
extremely comfortable in learning late and could not sign the The course structure was a little
the materials because the Social Philosophy and Ethics are the main attendance sheet, but it made me rocky at first, because of how the
Theorist and their concepts are reasons for my exceptional grade come to class on time, if I wanted new teachers, such as Dr. Forde,
taught by repetition. Every point average (GPA) and because to be counted. However, he does would have to transform from
Monday and Wednesday, their there are no classes pertaining to have a side of compromise that Alabamian to Texan curriculum.
names and links of these this subject here at UNTD, Dr. had taken the time out to Classes, studies, and Testings are
Sociologists are embedded into Forde has given our class a understand our strengths like better because we are honestly
our mental notes and made known knowledgeable pattern into writing and matching;weaknesses learning the materials that were
for our future encounters Sociology which makes the subject like testing and multiple choice, made easy to learn and not hard
throughout our journey of higher more acceptable and familiar while seeking the problem and to understand. We have to know
education. while changing into the field. tackling them head on. the answers!!!
The exams were very unclear in
instructions. The tests had to be
explained numerous times to the
students. Also, the grading of the
tests seem very unclear but I think
since it is Dr. Forde's first year, he
will soon adapt and correct these
comments. Every class I have had,
if you have a doctors note, you are
excused and may make up a test, The course structure was very
but in this class, Dr. Forde seems tentative due to the late arrival of
to let you be excused no matter the book which is not under
what. And instead of making up anyone's control so it just made
the exam, he says the next one will the syllabus hard to follow at first
make up for it. This seems strange but Dr. Forde quickly and easily
to me because no matter what, fixed this issue. In this course,
the other students will have more blackboard was used very rarely,
points in their total average than to post grades and extra credit. I
someone who did not get to make feel like the TA's are a bit
up the exam. If I was to take test 1 inexperienced with this system.
and 3 but not 2, that is only 200 This is my 4th year at UNT and I
points possible whereas someone Good Department Chair and spent another year at another
who took all the exams has a experience. I feel the chair should major university and I would like
possible 300. I am not sure why I not teach the intro class because to say I comfortable using
was not able to make up the exam of his knowledge and expertise.It blackboard but the grades posted
and I hope it does not show in my sometimes makes it difficult to in this course are the most
final grade. It seems a bit unfair understand what points he make confusing I have ever seen.There is
but maybe I do not understand the Sociology is very great topic and because they are much more no structure in the grading system
grading criteria. Dr. Forde kept it interesting advanced than an intro class. it seems.
This course required heavy The course content was very
reading. In that respect it is interesting in that it relates to daily
difficult but at the same time the social problems and it has an The instructor is well educated and
content is memorized much explanation by theorist to almost percise about the content we go The structure of the course is well
quicker. everything. over. constructed.
You really have to know the
material and think like a sociologist Fair and wants you to succeed.
to help you pass your tests. You Dont be scared to ask questions
have to keep a very open mind The course is very relevent to our but be prepared for not an exact
while in the class and while learing everyday lives and helps put answer. He somewhat talks like a
the material. It is necessary to different people's lives into our politician where he kind of dances
understand the different views the perspective and we get to see how around the question and litely
instructor talks about. it would be to walk in there shoes. touches on the subject.
challenging but fair interesting material very smart well spoken individual aligned well with syllabus
Well there were only three The course content was very good I think he is a very good instructor Well the course structure is good
examinations but I think they were and well explain through out the and knows the subject that he is because there is only three exams
fair and no so hard. semester. teaching and one paper.
Dr. Axer makes this subject very
interesting and explains fully what
is expected. I am signing up for a
majority of his classes for next
semester because his teaching
style is easy to understand and his Everything is in the sylabous and
classes are challenging. he has never been off track.
Very opinionated and teaches his
opinion at times rather than just
fair enough... I did not like taking this course. the facts.
Mr. Arxer is knowledgeable about
the material. He answers
questions if you have any. He
enjoys class participation. He's
available in his office and he meets
The exams are fair, with the The content of the course is with you if needed. He helps you The structure of the class seems
multiple choice questions and with interesting. It let's you know about understand the material if you are to flow ok. I wish it was easier, but
the essays, it let's you know how thehistory and what happened in having difficulty. I enjoy him as a the more you read the more you
much you've learned. the past. teacher. know
The course structure is very fair.
The content is very relevant to the The instructor talks clearly about The course is evenly distributed
This course is not difficult, but subject and things are very the subject and doesn't hold back along the semester and so you
there is alot of reading to be done. relatable to life. any information. dont get swamped with work.
I believe he graded a bit hard on
the essay questions on the exams.
We explained the essay questions
the best we can and probably got
our point across, but if we miss a
specific term he was hoping for The instructor does well in
but did not tell us he wanted us to explaining theories and such, but
emphasize on it, he would take he tends to ramble on and I forget
points off. N/A what the point of the topic was. N/A
A very well educated professor,
This course is very interesting and I very talented and very informed
the examinations are good and fair have learned a lot on the subject Very well organized
enamination are very hard to
determined what the subject
should be
She is a nice person but it seems
that she is not that interested in
what she is teaching and often
This class is very difficult for me to changes due dates or losses
stay concentrated in because the assignmnets that have been
instructer in not going over the turned in. She doesn't clearly state
material listed in the sylibous and what is expected in projects that
she often gets off schedual. are due. Not very well structure.
Personally I have nothing against
this instructor and as my grade
demonstrates, my issues are not
about grades. This class is the
most disorganized class I have ever
had. The syllabus was not
followed at all even to the point of
counting of points on assignments
for things that were not required
by the syllabus. This instructor has
no command of the classroom and
no talent for teaching. She surely
should not be teaching on a
university level and would
question whether she should be
teaching at all. The frustration was
It is hard to comment on the never knowing what was required
content of the course as we only to the point that the class became There was no discernable
Exams were fair and consistent. covered 50% of the course. a waste of time. structure.
Exams was very difficult, She did
not explain much at all. Her
lectures had nothing to do with Her style of teaching is unusual, i
the exams at all. When you though think if she explain what she wants
you understood the class and was out of a student and also have a
ready for the exam, you found out lecture that consists of her exams
that nothing she talked about was the class will be better. She always
on the exam and also nothing on This is a good course, bu tit needs would go way off course
her study guide was on the exam. another instructor. concerning the subject at hand. There was no structure in this class
nice teacher, but needs to clear on
what is expected of assignments, confused;didn't know what to
good and fair. very interesting projects. expect when we met in class.
I felt that the multiple choice
questions were a very broad way
of testing. I never performed up
to my personal standards, never
knowing what questions I actually
got wrong as I had to set an appt
to see the test questions again.
My fault for not getting the appt,
but I have kids and a tight Could be a bit more organized, but
schedule. was a nice teacher.
this instructor is a mediocre
instructor. she seems to be easily
confused. when the class has
questions about an assignment or
requirements of an assignment,
she easily gets lost and basically
just tells you what she thinks you
want to hear so that you can stop
asking the question. her answers
aren't consistent from student to
student, which often causes great
exams were fair and covered most content was always related to the confusion among the students and
material presented in class. subject EVEN THE PROFESSOR!
the exams were not consistent
with the review. difficulty in
understanding the expectancy of lecture was sometimes vague. Not
exams. questions are not really much of an outline so it was hard Wished to have more concrete
clear and precise. to know what was relevant. lecture
mrs. Jasmin is always available in
her office. She listens to the
students, she works with the
students if their are problems in
class assignments. I enjoy her as a
teacher. I'm satisfied with her class.
She needs to maintain better
control of the class. Too many
sidebar conversations are
distracting.
The instructor was not completely
organized, and some assignments
were not clear. Grading practice
was unclear initially, and had to be
explained repeatedly for clarity.
Her accent was hard to Her points system in grading was
understand. confusing.
This course was one of the most She is extremely nice but I fear she
interesting ones I have take so far. is not authoritative enough. Once
Had there been more organization the students began to talk she has
Reviews were given, adn exams I would have learned more. I a hard time getting back into
covered most materials in the bought the book, so perhaps I'll be focus. If she controls that, she will
chapter. If you read the book, you doing more reading on teh subject be able to cover more material IN More organization, and everything
should do well. in the future. CLASS should go smoothly.
I can tell she was extremely smart
and intelligent but I don't know
how well she is suited for
teaching....she would get so
flustered with the confrontations
in the class that she would never
really answer any questions. The
people in the class didn't help
either though...they for some
The exams were always way to reasoon would have rathered
detailed for what we covered in argued than actualy have learned
class, in other words she put things or done something
on the exams that we had not I was very interested in the course productive...but either way the
covered or were maybe not even material and sometimes would instructor should have
in the book. I always felt extremely just read the book while the class commanded the class and taught
confused going into her exams, I argued about grading systems or what she was meant to teach! She
have made 88's on both exams due dates....which was another always acted like she was doing a
which I was happy with I thing that irriated me... sometimes favor by not covering material that
guess...but I still don't think the we would take 45 minutes to we never got around to but I
course material was as interesting discuss menial things like her personally came into this class
and stimulating as it could have grading system or a test grade or hoping and wanting to learn so
been. I was really looking forward something like that, which had much from this class instead I
to this course and was very nothing to do with the subject learned very little and didn't even There wasn't much structure,
disappointed. matter! It was so frustrating! enjoy coming to class. everything changed everyday!
Seemed a bit unorganized and
unsure when asked questions
regarding assignments. But overall
I enjoyed her and would take a
Fair. I love this subject. class again. ok.
The instructor allowed students to
make disrespectful comment
about other students, which create
a hostile class environment. The
instructor change the syllabus
several times within the semester
Examinations were difficult. and the degree of grading.
It a challenging course in that it Everything we talk or discuss The instructor is very nice and
requires a lot of team work or about in class is relevant to the understanding.She knows how to The course was well structured
group work outside of class. course material. communicate well to the students. and I liked the content.
dates were clear but expectations
regarding content were not very
clear. Instructor made the
comment that she was not very Prof was respectful but quite a Course structure should be a bit
impressed with a presentation that conformer. I would say be more more concrete. The changes in the
I'd done. Well when your assertive and stand your ground syllabus were pretty big and a lot
expectations are not very clear and and not make so many of students were unhappy with
were just guessing and hoping to accommodations for people. This them. Syllabuses are supposed to
get it right what do you expect. is college not high school so your be guidelines but if the
Sidenote: You have A PHD and I students need to get it together or requirements are altered so much
Test were reasonable and am never too impressed with your get on, either way not your doesnt really serve its purpose
understandable presentations. problem and let them know that. now does it.
I am sure that Dr. Jesmin is a
smart, talented teacher. I
understand that she had just
moved her family so I am willing to
cut her some slack. However, it
seemed that she was in over her
head teaching this class. We had
to skip over the last five chapters
because she could not get through
the course material. Dr. Jesmin
was never prepared, did not follow
the syllabus, and did not have
control of the classroom. There
were several instances in which
the first 30 minutes of class time
was dedicated to how she would
be grading the papers. In my
The videos were not necessary and opinion, Dr. Jesmin is not the right
I felt took away from the course. person to be teaching a course
The fact that we spent two classes that has a large class (over 30
Standard multiple choice exams. watching a Nicole Kidman movie students). I'm not sure if it was
Would prefer some short answer spoke volumes on what this class because she is new to this campus,
question to stimulate the mind. would be like. but I was thoroughly unimpressed.
pretty fair relevant
fairness course content is relevant good instructor course structure is good
Insructor was not prepared for an
overwhelming majority of class
instuction, it seemed that the days
lecture and activity was always on
the fly." No language barrier
seemed to be present, however
the instructor did not seem to
have skills of delivery in order to
be an effective instructure. The
I am not too caught up on a review instruct is very nice, and seems to
(none was provided but this is ok) course content, subject matter and have knowledge of the
however,reading chapters as my the relevance of this course is information but instructing and No structure seemed to be present
review is ok but the exam not important however the delivery of delivering the information to the at any time, there were numerous
being entirely related to the expertise was not present in order class did not seem to be an area of waiting periods within the lecture
readings is not so great. not for this course to have an impact expertise for the instructor. Plainly in order for the instructor to direct
knowing what to expect on an on my learning and making the the instructor seemed to be the class on to the next point or
exam is not great sociological puzzle whole. frazzled for the most part." topic
Dr. Jesmin does not offer any
evening hours to meet with
students although hours are listed
on her syllabus. She wants to meet
with you during the day. When
you do set up an evening
appointment with her, she does
not show up. She does not seem
Mid-term exam had questions that interested in helping with
were not in the text and when questions regarding assignments
asked where the info came from or what is expected and she
she never responded. Refused to changes grading expectations near
go over the questions/answers to the end of the semester. She
help us understand what the confused the entire class with her
correct answers were. I made a attempt to change how she would
high B, but many did not. grade.
I like the professor personally, but
We never covered material in she could not facilitate and we
class. The number of exams was I did not learn a thing this spent a lot of time arguing and not
okay, but we were ill prepared. We semester. I was very disappointed learning. It took hours to go
received study guides, but showing as the subject has the potential to through a few slides and nothing
up to class was pointless. be so interesting. was retained. This could have been 100% online.
She does not seem interested
about the topic. I think she could
Dr. Jesmin does not fully explain put more lecture and information
her requirments. into the course. Very unorganized.
My least favorite instructor. I've
heard lots of complaints
throughout the semester from
other students. Very difficult to
understand because of her accent.
She often came to class
unprepared. Had nothing for us to
discuss or do. Did not go over class
material. Made up information as
she went along and encouraged
individual discussion to fill up class
time. Played lots of movies during
class time because she had
nothing planned. Graded unfairly
and changed the grading scale as
the semester came to an end. Very
Very difficult exams. Did not cover The course content would've been unhappy with this professor! She
the material in class that was on interesting if the professor would may look great on paper, but she
the test. have followed the curriculum. cannot teach. n/a
Although I have much respect for
my professors, I have to say with
all the respect I have for Dr.
Jesmin.This evaluation is based on Unfortunately, there was no
her abilities as a professor. course structure. It was very
Unfortunately,she was by far of all difficult to get clarification on
my professors extremely lacking in assignments, exam reviews, and
her teaching skills and presence. lectures. I was very disappointed I
the exams were at some level of She had very unstructured and took this course and would not
difficulty but at times it reflected The course content dealt with the unfocused lectures, too much recommend any other student to
and did not reflect the materials sociology of health and illness. The information in a short amount of take this course with this particular
given to be studied. The grading social implications surrounding time to cover,and no clarification professor. only if there's
was at some level of fairness. healthcare. of the course content. improvement!!!
Very unorganized, let other
students turn in their work late
when I worked hard to get mine in
Examinations are difficult and if on time. Does not lecture very It's a 3 hour a day course, we could
they do not teach us the material I liked the book we had but not the well, we are teaching our self by be learning a lot more in a 3 hour
how are we suppose to do well? instructor's lectures. reading on our own. period.
I know that she means well but I
honestly didnt feel that she was
prepared for class and really had a
good understanding how to teach
the class efficiently and properly.
Dr. Jesmin is a nice person, but
sometimes her delivery is
challenging for me. I have to work
extra hard to grasp what she has
said. I have sent a couple of
emails to her with no response.
Maybe if the class wasn't so large
and she didn't only talk on one Course structure is fine. I see how
Only had one exam so far, it was the course content is relavant to side of the conference room" it the assignments and videos are
difficult, the class average was 70 the course. the topics are would be more stimulating and relevant to the class and what is
after xtra credit given. discussed are relevant as well engaging. " being read in the book.
The instructor was constantly
changing the assignments. The was no structure.
Very professional, very
The class is very fair, easy to knowledgable, engages you with Well prepared. Easy to follow and
understand and very interesting. Very informative and interesting the subject matter. understand
Her exams were worded well
What structure? Again, this class
The instructor has answered her is completely disorganized and
cell phone during class, been frustrating. We didn't receive ANY
unprepared to accept assignments feedback until way past the point
(how hard is that?), told us to just of no return. That in itself was
read the book and we will be fine completely UNFAIR. If we are
(untrue), dismissed student expected to hand in work in a
concerns over feeling timely fashion, I think it is
unprepared,continuously changed reasonable to get feedback in a
I feel considering the total lack of The subject matter is interesting, assignments, due dates, etc. so timely fashion as well. If you are
instruction for this class, the exams however we spend most of our that it is VERY confusing to keep not doing something correctly, she
were difficult. In all of my other classes watching movies and up with all of her whims. Overall, I would allow you to continue to
courses, I have scored in the top solving the aids crisis in Africa feel irritated that I am expected to make the same mistakes
5% of the class on exams, except rather than covering the material prepared yet feel that she is not repeatedly b/c you never get your
for this one which I attribute to the in the book and gaining a deeper prepared and shows a total lack of work back. I could read the book
fact that Dr. Jesmin doesn't understanding thatw ould help on interest and seems to actually at home by myself for free. That
actually teach. the exam. avoid teaching the material. isn't why I paid to take this course.
Always unorganized and unsure!
I am sad to say I am very
disappointed with my class
experience. We spent too much
time on one chapter and did not
go over other chapters at all and
were tested over them. We were
instructed to just read them on our
own. She would give an
assignment and have us to do it
again because it was not done
right. Let me say she changed her
mind how she wanted it when she
saw the assignments. There was
no specific format for doing them
prior to turning them in. She was
undecided on the grading system.
When trying to explain it in class
she herself became confused as to
her system. Her response to
helping was just read the chapters
you will do fine. I reached out to
her about my concerns and grade
and she basically that I needed
motivation and to read. She
disagreed with everything I said
but the entire class would agree
with what I was trying to express
to her. If she provided adquate
I feel the class as a whole was not The course content in the book information and for studying and
prepared for instructors exam. Her was intersting and I thought would testing people would not do so
study guide was very vague. Her have been an interesting class. poorly in her class. If she was
response was we should read the Unfortunately that was not the doing her part and people did not
chapters which we read. But we case. The material that I read on do well it is not her fault. When
did not go over 2 of the 4 chapters my own made the think of health you are not doing your part as an
at all. You can read the chapter but and illness being related to instructor your students pays the This course there really was no
who knows what to focus on when sociology that I never actually cost. I understand there is outside structure we certainly did not go
reading or be familiar with. thought about a social issues. work required in all classes and by the syllabus.
She is not clear alot,she is not
She goes all over the place for prepared and her test are all over.
instances, if she pull up something Also, I was excited about the
off the internet then after she talk course but as the professor that
about she would say sometimes, taught this class, it in turn made
we will have a test with some of I really like Sociology of Health me not interested in health and I
this and then she will. Her tests because it is in itself an interested was disappointed. I probably
are inconsistent and not relevant course so that is why I wanted to should have taken this course
with whats at hand at times. take this course another time. I have no comment.its okay
the instructor knows her material
well, i do feel however that she
needs to have a better control of
the class and not let students
make decisions for her. many
times the professor would say
something and students in
particular one girl would disagree
with her because it didnt
professor provided exam reviews accomodate her in some way and
and told us what to read, for some she would cause a big stir in the
especially one girl that was not content was very interesting and class and the professor wouldnt i like the way the syllabus was
enough and she complained about valuable to personal and business say anything almost as if the planned out i thought it was fair
everything life professor was intimidated by her and challenging
Review is given, but not when she
says it will be posted. However, Difficult to understand at times,
the tests are clear and mutiple very unorganized,there is no
choice. structure in this class.
Need to sharpen up on her English.
worst you have to read the book
and pray for the best. Know Worst class I ever take, know
lecture at all none lecture at all bad
A lot of information, would have
liked more illustrations, movies,
data, etc... The material covered Syllabus was self explanatory. A lot
were all great and interesting, of material for 3 hour class. Class
would like more examples. Class participation was good when
would be better broken into two documentaries and movies were
days verses one. A lot of Great job explaining, the concepts introduced with the books
Difficult, would prefer more review information for one day and at of Health and Illness. Very good concepts. Should don't more
on assignments during class. night, 7PM - 9:50PM after 8 hours information of Global Concepts interaction with other materials
Understanding and fair across the of work, and one class before the and Data. Michael Moore timing them into to text. The
board. 7PM class. Documentary! Africa Documentary.
Instructure must learn to speak
english, this is one reason why its
hard to learn. Its more than
reading the book.
The instructor would come to class No structure at all, I came to class
unprepared, and she wasnt very to hear other students opinions,
clear, and this class could have and I feel I am owed a refund for
been online. attending the class
The exams really does not cover This class has been a complete The instructor is a nice woman,
the actually matieral that was waste of time. This should have but she is not prepared to be an
covered in class. been an online course. instructor.
Receives knowledgeable contents The instructor is very
Examniation are fair on the sourse knowledgeable The course was structure very well
not fair. everyone failed. content? unorganized structure?
Dr. Jesmin is not available during
evening hours, she does not
explain what is expected of
students. She changes grades
which confuses me. She is not
clear as to what will be on the
exams -- she promises that she will
post exams, review of exams,
home work assignments BUT does
not post anything until a few days
before exams or due dates. She is
Were very difficult and topics easily swayed by the students ---
assigned did not come on the Very difficult to understand this she does not have control of class -- Not good --- the text book is
exams -- topics were not covered course as we never could get many are talking while she is difficult and the professor was
in class through the PowerPoint/lectures lecturing difficult to understand and follow
Would take another course with
Instructor grade fairly Interesting but sometime boring Easy to approach and talk to insturctor
I found the exams very challenging The professor encouraged us to
and the professor allowed us to voice opinions, and ask questions.
voice opinions. Even though I did She explained the material very
very well on the exams I like the well, considering this class is
fact that one exam didn't depict if I required and can be challenging
would pass of fail the class. due to the content.
more in depth to the foundation of Awesome! Very Knowledgeable appropriate, however could be
all appropriate sociology Strong delivery Available delivered online
I think the course material was
I think Mrs. Crowe was very fair boring and did not catch my
and understanding interest
Some of the content is interesting
& some is boring, but Prof. Crowe Prof Crowe is a great teacher. I feel
does a good job of bringing the like I can go to her with questions
Her exams are fair. We know what more boring content to life. She's and she was flexible if I need help
she expects from us so we are funny, which makes class more understanding an assignment. I
prepared when we take an exam. enjoyable. truely appreciate that!
Very boring class. She did not
Exams were fair, but essay exams. make it fun or interesting. Gave
She required us to write 4 pages essay exams and graded pretty
on each topic during class. rough.
Wasn't to much of an over load
She was fair in grading ..thats a plus She is passionate about her job
Grading participation and The professor was a litter dry at
attendance is a little like high first, but once the class started she
Exams count for 30% of the school, this is a upper level course, developed a rapport with the
course, wish they would carry s treat us for what we are juniors students and that started a very
higher percentage, at least 60%. and seniors. enlighten experience. no comments
Exams were fair. Course content was relevant.
Very thought provoking Alot to learn Very informative
Exams are fair. Especially when the All topics discussed in this course
exam questions sre given before Instructor explains well and goes Great personality, outgoing, deal with everyday life and I think
hand to assure a passing grade. over well needed to know topics. helpful, willing to listen. it will help me professionally
really got me interested in theory
essay exams are great subjects Great Instructor very good
Maybe narrow down the reviews
for the exam. It's a wastes of time
when she gives 10 essays but is
only 5 are on the exam and we are
expected to select 2 essay
questions. We spend all of our
time on the studying 10 questions Overall, the instructor is very
when there's only 2! I don't think knowledgeable about this course.
there's consideration of other However, she is lacking
courses that students are taking. preparation. Providing power
Overall, there is a fair grading scale points and sending emails days
on the exams. prior to class is helpful.
fair
totally cool!!
They are very challenging, but if
you've read the material, kept
notes, paid attention, or a
combination of one or more you I like her overall. She gets along
can do pretty well. I believe they well with diverse student
are fair. It was all quite interesting. population.
The examinations are very fair. good Super instructor good
The structure of the course was
very conducive to my learning.
This course was very beneficial to The exams, papers, class
me in that it provided other points participation and readings were
The exams were fair. They of view and other ways to think Dr. Crowe is very knowledgeable laid out in a manner that produced
required extensive thought and about approaching society and all about the subject matter, and good results and tied all the
research which evoked new ideas the reasons people and situations she's very approachable and fair in theorists together to help make
and ways of reasoning. are the way they are. her dealings with all students. good sense of the subject matter.
i wish teacher was more sensitive
to students of diversity instead of
saying take your paper to the
writing center email me and let me
know what it is that i need help on
exams are fine i wish questions i have struggled with this for years
were not so wordy sometimes find and i found this comment
them hard to understand disheartning
I have enjoyed my semester with
Dr. Crowe. She stayed on track and
throughly lectured on each
I believe the examines are fair. The chapter. Her method was basic
require you think and they are and it works. You are able to ask
essay which is great for me. It questions and talk about subjects.
gives me the opportunity to I really like being able to write our
explain to her in my words what I decussion questions and she
know about a particular theoury. would work them in to lecture.
I really LOVE the essay exams. This
was my 1st time doing an essay
exam. It gives us a chance to
explain the different theories in The course content is appropraite Great instructor in Socialogical
our own words. for this class. Very good theory N/a
The content is good and I like her She is nice and willing to work with
Her exams for this class is fair. teaching style. you. The course information is good.
She is organized and try to carry
She is very helpful, nice and out due dates and assignments to
understanding and listen to you be returned back in a timely
None None also. manner.
Your are very passionate about
this class and it shows you are
more energetic in this one vs the
I liked the exam process I have enjoyed this class other class
Theory wasn't a strong area for me
but I have built and improved my Once the flow for the class was
communication skills while taking Great Job, very effective and obtained, the assignments moved
Difficult, but fair. this class. understanding! very effectively.
The exams administered by this
instructor are fair and appropriate.
Your success on each test is
contingent up on your familiarity Prof. Crowe made the material
with the information provided in and each concept and theory clear
class. and concise.
The was outstanding, I wanted to
drop this course and I went and
visited with Dr. Crowe. We talked
and she gave me some valuable
tips to help with my studies. I am
a student who wanted to drop this
course into a student who cant
You can do well if you prepare The course content was good, but I wait to take this Professor course
yourself before the exam wanted to do a group project. again. This course was interesting.
exams are very appropriately content was kinda full, a lot to well structured. really like the
formatted. absorb great teacher. coursework
Very informative, really knows her
Not TOO difficult Very informative subject very well structured
they were difficult It was a lot of
information that you had to go
over for the test. no comment she was sweet and comprehensive it was organized
She is respectful and often listens I think the essay are exams are
to here students point of views. good but the lecture should be
Sometimes her students get a little conducted in a manner that brings
The exams were difficult but too loud and it is tough get back about retaining the information, in
challenges are good. on track. particular Theory.
Although I have never taken an all
essay exam I find that this is a very
good way to give exams being that
we only have two essay question
that we must answer. Find it
better than all of the multiple
choise and true false trickery test.
Mrs. Crowe's test gve you the Mrs. Crowe is a great instructor.
advantage of explaning what you Breaks it down were you are able
have learned about the lecture by to understand while applying
expressing it through two essay examples of modern issues
questioned test. I really learned a lot. throughout the lecture.
she is always is the best
professional teacher that I ever
She is the perfect teacher. this course is very helpful. She is the best teacher. have it.
Finally a wonderful professor at
Very fair. Provides study guides UNTD! She honestly made me
that if done properly, you will do The subject matter is very dry and interested in pursuing this topic in Very well laid out. All assignments
well on the exam. The number of difficult, however the professor graduate school, I have never felt are helpful in the final project and
exams and questions per exam is does a fantastic job at making it as so excited about learning, and the chapter layout is perfect in
appropriate to material learned. interesting as possible. eager to understand the topic. understanding the subject.
Dr. Crowe has lots of knowledge One small thing was that she did
but unfortunetely it does not come not make clear how long the paper
across clear. I was very interested was suppose to be. In the
in this course because I was hoping beginning she had mentioned 10-
to llok for a job in research but I 15 pages, so my groups worked
learned nothing in this class. I hard to meet the requirements.
sincerely did study but Dr. Crowe Then by the end of the semester
(although she is available to talk to she had lowered the amount to 6-
her students) did not do a good 8 pages. By then our paper was
job of helping me understand the more than met the first mentioned
content of this course. requirement.
she was available for help easy
good content but teaching style access to professor don't like her
fair but long was a little confusing teaching style course appropriately structured
Dr. Crowe is a unique lady with I didnt like the structure of the
The course content is excellent for very interesting perspesctives. She group project. The class consisted
students who are continuing on to is natural as the earth which is of 90% adult women, with many
Diffucult,but one has to expecet grad school, expecially in a social very refreshing in the world of being over the age 30. It was a
this in a senior level course. The sceince.I feel sorry for the students Sociology and Psychology. Dr. different experience to say the
test are design to see if the study who took it as an elective. It would Crowe is a aproachable and her least. Its over now so good luck to
can apply the concepts. suck to be them. office is always open. the next subjects.
At first, I did not like the instructor
but by the end of the semester I
actually appreciated and respect
her for what she taught us. Would The only thing I dislike was the
They are difficult only if you do not have liked it better if you would group activity. There was a major
read the required material. I had have taken controlled of the class problem with the free-rider
no problem but others did. better. problem.
Examinations were tedious and
difficult. Consisting of Multiple The instructor needed to work on
Choice, True False, and Short her professionalism in attire and
Answer and afterwards having a personal grooming. I was
class lecture. Nearly 100 questions The content of the course was distracted on many levels due to
on exam and she believes that her relevant to the course, however, the attire that she wore and her
class is the only class that we need the instructors teaching style was untamed hairstyle. That aside, she
to study for. not to my liking. would stutter a lot. I disliked the course structure.
If I was able to change anything
about this course, it would be the
format of the exams. We are not
tested on the knowledge the way
we`ve learned it.
n/a n/a n/a n/a
The way the material is covered in
lecture and the way the material is I think that the homework needs
covered on the exam is much to be stressed more as the steps to
different. I think that the exams completing the paper at the end of
are a little more difficult than they the semester. Perhaps homework
need to be. 5 could be split up a little more.
I like the fact that we did a lot of
The overall information we learn in class participation and group
the course can seem assignments. I feel like I learned
The terminology in the course is overwhelming when the time more through class participation
somewhat difficult. comes to take the test. and group work.
I lost interest during the lengthy
I feel as if some of the material we power point lectures. I think if the
were told to study was not on the class was more hands-on, it would She is very knowledgable when it The textbook was not needed due
exam. I think that the tests were have been a better expericence for comes to the material covered in to the fact that the professor had
too difficult. me. the course. power point lectures every night.
The test are very difficult.
The exams are extremely difficult
but the professor gives us a good
idea of what material will be She is very passionate about
covered. HOwever, each test I really like how all her research. She seems to be a good The course structure is fine but
seems like a final exam and it very assignments help us towards our instructor. However, she loves to seems like it is more for graduate
intense. final presentation. hear herself talk. school instead of undergrad.
Quanative and Qualitative Data GREAT JOB!!!! I didnt like the fact
Collection should be that we had NEW instructors but
Dr. Crowe your exams are so combined...also Stats should be Dr. Crowe teaches great and she is
confusing....please provide the required 1st! Luckly I have taken passionate about the subject...I ONE COMMENT......NO MORE
study guide two weeks before the Buisness Stats so I am aware of really enjoy taking her class! I hate GROUP PROJECTS!!!! OOOOOOO
test some of the terms....just fyi that its once a week... no more :)
The subject matters can be The instructor doesn't seem very
interesting but the instructor experienced in the University
makes it uninteresting. She only frame. Teaching skills seem lame the course structure is not good.
goes over what we know already and not so good. This have caused The only thing I can really go by is
too long with 100 questions on and stretches the time with many students to withdraw from the powerpoint on ecampus and
regular Tests (difficult) nothing to actually talk about. the class sometimes that is unclear
Maybe its the subject matter but
this course does not intrest me
because I will most likely never use
this information in a career setting
An extreme amount to learn in
Very information intensive one semester Very thorough Laid out fine
Examinations are difficult and This couse should be combined
confusing. It gives no sense of with qualitative couse material
hope when teacher feels as though due to the fact that they are
those making a D is a great grade. intertwine with one another and
Seems like more students would overlap. Alot of information
do better if allowed a study guide seemed to be existant with the
more than one week in advance. qualitative class. Good Job Dr. Crowe.
The instructor should work on
being more time efficient. Any
course content that were needed
such as power points were
The exams were extremely hard provided the day of class, hours
and did not match the reviews. before, or not at all.
I hated the group paper. It's very
difficult to write a group paper
because everybody has different
writing styles. It'd be much easier
if we were to write our paper
alone. I thought it was a very
The exams were difficult but she confusing project as well. I didn't
did provide us with a good review like that it's worth 30% of our
sheet and fair amount of time to grade since we are relying so much
prepare. on others.
I am not agree that the 30% of our
final grade is based in a team
assignment because at this
Dr. Crown has knoledge about this educational level is too hard to
subject but she does not know coordinate students' time to work
how to teach it to students. together.
If Professor Crowe's nose ring is
going to bother her perhaps she
I felt that many times the should take it out during class. It
professor walked into the appears that she is picking her
classroom on exam day with the nose while standing in front of 70
intent to intimidate students. This students - not very professional!
was demostrated by her Professor Crowe creates an
demeanor-and instructions before atmosphere of animosty in her
handing out the test, refusing to classroom. It is almost as she
clarify questionsbefore the exam purposely pits the students in
began and during the exam. Also groups against each other
the wording in her exam questions encouraging discordwithin the
were many times unclear as to groups. Many times her
what she was looking for. instuctions were unclear.
In-class assignments are busy work
and non-productive. Group
assignments are hard to
accomplish in a night class. Having She is tough and grades very hard.
said that, she lectures on topics She creates an atmosphere that is
that are relevant but the delivery not conducive to learning - it is too
to ensure we understand could be worry more about how she is
They are too long and tricky. much different. going grade our work See comments above.
fair understandable awesome!!!!
the exams were pretty difficult,
but we were warned.
Exams were too difficult.
Questions seemed to have two or
more possible answers at all times
and were worded differently than
what was taught. Most of what
was learned in class did not seem
to be what was on the exam.
Group Projects. What is the
purpose? Is this a requirement of
UNT-dallas that every class has
sometime of group project. I think
The instructor tries to be engaging, it is totally unfair when an
but I feel the test & other individual grade is determined on
The examinations are difficult. requirments are a little extreme a group effort.
Random - in thinking, teaching,
examples, assignments, and
planning. Procrastinates in
assignments and grading,
especially when an assignment No structure. Continually
needs to be graded and reviewed questioning the purpose of
for the next assignment. Waits homework assignments and
Very difficult, confusing, and until last minute to post pertinent lecture. Assignments are
meant to be meticulous and tricky. Book is good but hard to get emails and presentations or supposed to be building blocks for
Some questions not from course elaboration or better assignment instructions. Discusses term paper and presentation
material or lecture, but from a understanding of some key points. personal experiences of this class (major percentage of final grade),
secret book" no one else has but Disconnect from book material too much. Not enough concrete but confused as to how it relates
instructor. Graded VERY HARD." and lecture. examples, too much reminiscing. or why certain things are done.
The exams seemed pretty difficult.
The subject matter is difficult and See above. I happen to be
since it is required for students interested in the subject and have
doing the Applied Arts and Science taken many SOCI courses, as well
major who may not have any as a Logic course and some
sociology background, I can see statistics,and I still found some of
how some people would struggle the subject matter challenging. I like the instructor. I think she is
with the exams. But I think it's relevant. fair, and nice. It's fine.
She is a very interesting instructor
The tests were difficult but easy to and knows a lot about what she is
follow and understand talking about.
I enjoyed everything about this
class except for the group project.
My group mates did sub-par work
and everything had to be done via
email which is not very efficient
and slogging through 40 emails a
I thought the exams were fair yet The content of this course is I felt the instructor was excellent in day was extremely annoying and
challenging. appropriate. explaining concepts. time consuming.
She is very dedicated and devoted
to teaching courses!
teacher seems to ignore issues
that could possibly upset student
in ways because of the amount of
diversity at this university
She is a good professor, but must
deliver complicated content; which It is well structured and the
Tough and tedious, but that is the Well structure, but I am not can create negative feelings professor does a good job of
material... interested... toward her. maintaining it.
I think the instructor is very nice
VERY HARD and there are too but the material in this class is not
many questions on the exams that explaned very well and she makes
are paragraphs long and I get Some of the content does not her exams way to hard for people
confused by all the words. make any sense. to pass I really do not like this course
THe information is very difficult
and she is teaching on a PHD level
NA not undergraduate level. She is nice. The information is difficult.
I thought she was well prepared,
at times a little long winded, but
very informative and Would like to be able to do more
Exams are difficulty and knowledgable about the subject hands on ie: developing surveys,
preparation is vague for the test I enjoyed the course content matter. conducting actual research, etc.
Too difficult for only 10% of grade. The course is extremely relevant. I
Too many questions for such a learned a lot about polls and
small amount of the grade. surveys. A bit boring.
Touch notch TEACHER! Hat's OFF
to Dr. Pott's. Versatile, open
minded, yet still challenging.
Enlighting and informative. Need
more instructors to relate t
professor to student. Prefer to
take Dr. Pott's for Stat's. She
Rigging the Game was one of my should be for upper level student's Social but still structured. Out of
A wealth of information. Difficult best reads this semester. Thanks during night classes rather than the box class. Bring an open mind.
but well explained. Dr. Pott's, Great books. Freshmen. Looked forward to her class.
Exams were multiple choice, but
very complex. I would rather have
had fill in the blank or essay due to Seems to be very good instructor,
the difficulty of the exam. Test but makes course very time
would be like 85 question over 5 consuming. Did not like the group
different chapters, timed, and a research project, hard to meet up
broad review,review was not with students that take night
linked well with exam. classes.
Dr. Crowe has a burst of energy for
the time of the class, she gets us
(student body) up, alert and
awake. The material she lectures
on is done in a way as not to tire
us out but to teach and then she
allows us to practice what we
learned.
Dr. Crowe, is very informative. Her
love for sociology and it's many
facets comes across in her style of
teaching and her seemingly
Somewhat difficult, confusing at unlimited knowledge base about I have no complaints only kudos
times. Course content very relevant the subject. for the structure.
I do not think it was Professor
Crowe more of the subject matter
that she was teaching though. I
did not like that we were not
allowed to use our computers, it is
a college level class, so computers
should be allowed. Also, she
seemed to upload the
PowerPoint's for each class usually
an hour or so before the class
The exams were a bit difficult. It would start, which sometimes The course structure was good,
seemed like they were setup to made it difficult to print out a copy with the exception of no
trick you, wherein there could be The subject matter was very dry especially since I had a class computers. Personally, I am a
multiple correct answers for one and boring, it was hard for me to before. It would help if she could much faster typist than a writer, so
question when in reality there was focus in this class because it just upload them in the morning, so I the typing helps me concentrate
only one correct answer choice. was not interesting to me. could download before class. better.
I have learned a lot from this
She teaches the class with great course that helps me in other
Little dificult Contents are relevent knowledge classes
large class but I think there should the topic should be chosen after
have been more interaction and more classes so that the
hard but fair less lecture. she is a subject matter expert assignment is better understood.
Dr. Crowe is very enthusiastic
about sociology and research,but
she does not overpower you with
her knowledge or zeal. She does
The exams were a bit difficult, but make it interesting and easy to
they were definitely fair. understand.
Awesome, knows and cares about
the information being delivered,
open an able to answer all
questions, relates to each Awesome...I am learning so much
all appropriate for course, helped all appropriate for preparing me to student...common ground and I belive it is partly due to the
me to retain information continue in this field definitely structure of the course
Awesome professor! She is very
Exams were fairly easy. The helpful and easy to understand.
professor gave a review before Makes the class fun and keeps her
each exam. Exam questions came students interested. By far the best
straight from the notes and instructor i've had at UNT. I hope
discussion in class. she stays!
I enjoyed Dr. Potts class
tremendously,she was very
knowledgeable about the course
information. I would recommend
her to other students and I also
believe she should continually
The course content was very teach this course because of her
informative and I enjoyed learning ability of relating the course to The course structure was stable
about different qualitative individuals and not just using and I was able to understand and
methods of retrieving and terminology but also realistically work with the information
conducting research. applying it. provided.
It was a privilege to study under
Dr. Potts she is an asset to the
university.
I would like to see more exam Very personable, but her
questions come from the course comments are a little off the wall
book, instead of the professor sometimes. She definitely
personal notes. no comment. provides stimulation to the room. no comment.
Instructor is exceptional. She
explains topics very clearly and her
lectures are conducted very well. I
Exams were very fair and of Course was very informative and would look forward to taking more The course is structured
appropriate difficulty. taught very well. of her classes in the future. appropriately.
totally awesome!!!!
GREAT GREAT GREAT
Very clear and straight to the point Very clear INSTRUCTOR!!!!!!!! Very clear
Dr. Potts is a very good instructor.
The university needs more
instructor like Dr. Potts. DR. Potts
Good exams, you have to study for I have learned a lot from this needs to teach more Soci. class
them. course, and the instructor. here at U N T Dallas. course is good
Need more instructor like this
instructor.
This instructor was very interesting
and made this course meaningful.
My day of class I thought I was not
When I prepared myself for the The course content was good and going to like her but she is a great
exam I did well. at times excellant instructor. The structure was good.
Helen Potts is the best sociology it was the most well-structured
best examinations ever! we did cool stuff! professor ever! class EVER!
This instructor is always willing to
help, and her office hours are
accessible for any student
(working or not). She explains the
material very well, and never
seems to get frustrated. I have
taken classes from her in the past,
and continue to give her merit.
This professor is the complete
opposite of the professor in
qualitative research. She made
quantitative research
understandable in some many
areas. After taking her class, I
The exams are from the book and would look for problems to
class notes, if you study, you will complete on my own time. Kudos
do well. no comment. to professor Potts. no comment.
They were ok They were ok They were ok They were ok
Professional and laid back at the
same time. Dr.Potts read the class
Dr.Potts prepared us for each well and grasped when the entire"
exam and was available to assist class did not understand, she
with any questions or concern in gladly went over topics if she felt
regards to the exams everyone did not understand"
I was very afraid about taking this
course because I knew this was
going to be a hard subject. But the
first day I walked into this course I
knew it was going to be okay
because Professor Potts is an
amazing teacher, she wants her
students to fully understand the
material. I feel confident about
this class and the work because of
her!
The instructor is very helpful and
explains everything clearly. I The structure of this class was
enjoyed taking this class with her. good and easy to follow.
The exams are very exact and you Having a required course with such
have to know your material very Dr. Potts made course material, difficult material only offered at
well, to do well, but they are fair that is tidious and confusing night, one day a week made the
and Dr. Potts walks you through The couse material is tidious and understandable and taught us class harder to succeed in. I think
the process very well. confusing. well. the University failed on this level.
at some points instructions can be
confusing and when asked for help
you are made to feel like an idoit.
Alot of writing I have a writing She knows her subject very well
disability which makes it hard to and is very energetic and
write. It was very interesting to me. informative about it. It was structured well.
Dr.Cottlege makes herself
available at all times to students
The tests were fair and Dr. for any situation and goes the
Cottlege makes sure that we have extra mile to come to some sort of The course is well structured and
a clear understanding of the The course content is relevant to resolution or accommodations does not leave room for slacking or
material and plenty of time to the course and helps in getting a stressing the power of putting things off, but the work is
prepare for the essays we will have broad understanding of the communication between students manageable and very helpful for
to write about. course. and professors. the examinations.
Very knowledgeable and has a
great deal of life experience to
Testing is fair and covers relevant Interesting and allows for bring into teaching of criminal Structure is appropriate to course
subject matter discussion through open dialogue justice/corrections/sociology content
She's a great teacher, knows how
to keep the students involved, and
I would recommend this teacher
to any students going into my field
Good instructor, very
all appropriate all appropriate knowlegdgealbe could be taught online
IT'S A COMPLETE JOKE. Had to to a
group project over cocaine with 10
other classmates (my group had
mostly white kids, while our
instructor and the majority of the
class was predominantly black.)
After being told by our instructor
that our presentation was to be
roughly 50 mins in length, and
working on our assignment for
over a month, we were told once
we stood up to begin our project
that she believed ours would be
too long (we had made 55 slides
over cocaine) The group after us
had 66 slides, and the entire class
was forced to stay late to hear
their entire presentation. (I hate to
say it, but the last group was
Beyond pointless, besides a predominantly black students, she
complete waste of my time. I've didn't ONCE interrupt any of them,
had to read a total of 7 articles this nor tell them to cut their
semester 30+ pages each and then presentation shorter.) I find this
am asked to submit a critique of too be incredibly rude, and unfair
just a few paragraphs. I'm lucky to to the ENTIRE class. If a white
get my grade back within two instructor talked to a black student
weeks...two of her assignments that way, everyone would be up in
weren't even able to upload, and arms. It's reverse racism, and it's
then the instructor is unreachable SHE IS BEYOND RUDE, INSULTING, 100% unnecessary AND
through email. I don't think it fair AND HONESTLY I FEEL LIKE SHE'S unprofessional for a instructor to
to pay as much as I'm required to RACIST. THE WORST INSTRUCTOR act in that manner. I can't begin to
We've only had 2 exams the pay to attend these classes, to I'VE EVER HAD UNT. Took her at explain how pointless the
midterm and the final; they're have an instructor that acts like the South Campus, she makes the assignment of this caliber was
pointless. I learned all of this stuff she could care less. Thank God I entire campus look bad. I pity any anyway; but to be told by your
through attending DARE in grade graduate after this semester so I other student that ever has to take instructor that your power point
school. I can't believe this no longer have to deal with UNT's one of her classes and deal with seems too long, before you have
instructor even has her doctorate. often time jokes of instructors. her. even had a chance to begin
I love the foundation she lays and Interesting and teaching made the
the time she takes in preparing us concepts applicable to mundane
for the test as well as in grading. situations.
I like the way she do her test. The course content is good. I love her! I liked the way she teach.
AWESOME!!!
n/a n/a n/a n/a
Instructor challenged our thinking
The tests were appropriately The course was provocative but and was able to be neutral in
difficult and fair. relevant relation to her opinions.
It was a privilege to study under
Dr. Potts she is an asset to the
university.
Exams were fair. Content was relevant. Good instructor.
sort of combative, she seemed like
she was always ready to yell at
you, if you weren't in her click, she
very hard good left out people, not in her cliche okay
Instructor creates an atmosphere
The exams were more difficult Content is very interesting with that allows students to speak
than expected. good use of media. openly about a difficult subject.
good good good good
the exams where straight to the all course work is interesting and dr. potts, is the best professor ever the course was interesting and not
point discussable each class is a great experience.. too forward
Loved the course content. Its
everything no one wants to talk
about , the taboo or socially
unacceptable conversations. At
first I was taken back, but then I
realized, I am this way because of I love this teacher. The reason I
First test, hard..many people were social norms, social norms aren't love her is because she knows how
upset, it didnt seem like we were always right. I loved the way she to communicate with a class, steer
given the right materials to created a forum for us to learn the class, and control the class.
study..She then worked with us these subjects and her strength to She also knows what she is talking
and gave us all the necessary be willing to teach this subject. So about and you can tell she has
information on the other exams. educational, its like all the stuff actually read the material she is Good Job, easy to follow, easy to
She graded fairly and accurately on that the schools, parents, and the teaching us. She is personable and figure out, I know whats expected
her test. world didn't teach you part 1. smart. of me and when its expected.
the subject matter were great. I It was easy to follow. It was not
learn a lot. overload.
Are on an college level and if study
and go over all the material and do The teacher keeps you engaged
some thinking out side the box and the class discussion
then u will be ok. interesting.
This is the second class that I have
had with Dr. Potts and at first I
thought that I wasn't going to
enjoy but Dr.Potts is so cool and
I have to say this course was not understanding. She takes the time The course structure for this class
what I thought it would be but it to help you one on one if needed was pretty good. I think more
enlightened my knowledge on and she makes class enjoyable but review time for test should be
things that I never knew people you actually learn from how she given but overall it was one of the
I feel the exams are fair. felt. teaches. best classes I have had.
The subject matter and relevance The instructor was easy to speak
The examinations were of the course was straightforward with when needed, and extremely The readings and course structure
straightforward enough from the and easily understandable with knowledgeable of the given course were difficult at times, but to the
readings and assignments. appropriate acknowledgment. material. point.
I thought I was going to be
uncomfortable taking this class
when I first realized the subject,
but once I walked into the class
and knew who the instructor was, I
knew everything was going to be
alright. This was such an
interesting class to learn, and
Everything regarding the exams Professor Potts was the best
was fair, we were provided with teacher for it! Anything she
the material that we needed to teaches is valuable, and she is an
study for the exams. amazing teacher!
love Dr. Potts. we need more
instructors like her.
The exams are fair and within the Given the subject matter, Dr. Potts Dr. Potts is a very well versed and
context of the material presented. did an outstanding job in knowledgable regarding the
They are easy to study for, but will maintaining a sense of dignity and material and I would most The structure of the course was
challenge your understanding of respect when we discussed definitely take and recommend well organized it flowed smoothly
the subject matter. contreversial issues. any of her classes. throughout the semester
not impressive one sided, feminist, gay agenda does not respect others views gay agenda and anti hetrosexual,
The exams are pretty challenging
but it requires that I've read the
material and be present for our in
class videos to be able to pass the The course content is very relevant She is a nice but intelligent
test. to the course subject. instructor. I think it works well.
First exam was a mf(figure it out
lol) but the second exam, as we
were made more aware of the
expectations went a lot better. I
underestimated the first one but Love the instructors nonchalant
was better prepared for the first attitude, hate the conformist Structure was concrete, didn't
one, but it was over material that profs. so Kuddos to you...but have a lot if any alterations in your
we'd discussed the questions Course content was relevant and sometimes you were a bit moody syllabus, thank you. Stayed on
didn't just come out of left field appropriate and made clear and it was quite annoying schedule the whole semester
Course content is relevant to all
Fair and did a good job of covering students and the way the She is an excellent teacher who
the important issues and topics of instructor taught it left an attempts to open students minds It was appropriate for the course
our reading. opportunity for discussion to see the diversity among them content
Assignments are easy to
understand and complete. She
grades fairly Subject is interesting and fun Very friendly, easy to approach
course content was sometime
exams are fair difficult. instructor is well informed course structure is good
Dr. Axer has is very passionate
about the subject he teachesa and
I think that is what makes his
Dr. Axer stays on subject and on teaching styles interesting and his
track in reguards to the course and ways of explaining the context of
Grades very fair. its relevance. the course.
The instructor worked on
encouraging critical thinking, I really enjoyed Dr. Arxler, he is
I really appreciate the level of which I believe is essential in definitely a master of his craft and
difficulty in this class and the learning about gender and the i would recommend him to other
exams where given with fairness society around us. students.
GREAT job Dr. Arxer...there were I think it's a great idea that the
The subject matter is very many discussions that challenged course material was based on the
controversial and Dr. Arxer does a your instructions. But these master degree level. I feel
The examinations were great. I great job providing and discussions only highlighted your prepared to take the next step to
love the essay style exams! encouraging dialogue. high level of patience. the graduate school.
very handsome!!! i loved sitting on
the front row! held my interest
every class
everything was done on a
graduate level it was well put together challenges your creativity good
The course content and subject I am not a strong writer and this
Examinations were difficult but matter was very relevant to this course put a lot of emphasis on
fair. course and to my life. The Instructor was very helpful. writing.
knowledgeable, forthright, and
challenging very interesting and compelling very prepared good
Because the material is mentally The course content was very
stimulating, I appreciate writing interesting. Nothing that I would The course was accurately
papers in exchange for exams. The particularly look into, but found Professor Arxer is the best structured, starting with the basics
requirements were very clear as to something that I would like to professor I've had this semester, then developing into core areas
what was expected. discover more on my own time. he made me use my brain. about our main topic.
20 page paper for a 4000 series
class, really? Good control of classroom. Did I mention the 20 page paper?
formatted appropriately to handle very well structured to handle
more complex issues put together and relevant very intelligent, advanced readings and studies.
fair totally relevant very knowlegdeable about subject very well structured
ok good lectures are too narrator-sounding
The exams were challenging but
fair.
She needs to be more organized
and prepared for the course. I
it was difficult because we did not think she needs to gives more time
really know what she want us to to study for exams with more
work on in class. n/a material to study with. n/a
I enjoyed Professor Jesmin. She
knows her material and is
The course content was extremely knowledgeable about
appropriate and relevant to this Sociology. She is well versed and The course structure was uniform
The exams were fair. course. prepared. for the semester.
The instructor is ill prepared for
class. She is a sweet person but
cannot control the classroom. She
is not clear on what assignments
are due. Her entire syllabus had
wrong due dates. She allowed
students to take tests up to a week
later from the original exam date,
the students were not sick. This to
me shows a sign of unfairness, had
she let other students have that
option she would have seemed
fair. She is moody and will let
some students get away with
things like leaving class while
taking away class participation
points from someone else. So her
rountine is not realiable and she
shows signs of passive-agressive
behavior eventhough she comes
Course content is old and off as understanding. Overall she is
subjective. I think the class confusing and would be better if
Exams had questions that were material could be blended into she attended workshops because
worded differently from course other psychology classes but the her arrangements always change,
material. She could have given course itself needs to be retired or the class is all over with no set Course structure was confusing
essay questions. moved to a lower course section. structure. and disorganized.
The group project was very
difficult to accomplish, especially
since the majority of it had to be
completed away from cclass. With
so many students working, etc., it
was hard to really collaborate
Dr. Jesmin is a very caring together. It would also be helpful
The number of exams we had was instructor. She wants her students for Dr. Jesmin to provide details on
good. Dr. Jesmin realized that to do well and will go above and how she plans to grade the project
some chapters had so many beyond to help her students (i.e. 50% of the grade is based on
definitions, she deleted a chapter succeed. This includes providing the actual in-class presentation,
from the exam, which was much study guides and curves on test 25% is based on student
appreciated. Her exams are grades to help the class (both were evaluations of each other and 25%
extremely difficult. much appreciated). is based on the paper).
Very un-organized and not
together. She has no structure and
The exams had nothing to do with do not explain her assignments
her study guide or her lectures. well at all. Over all maybe she had
They were very difficult. And hard This is a very good subject, but the too much going on to focus on our
to understand. instructor did not do it any justice. subject. There was no structure
A little difficult to study for an The instructor is accessible, fair
exam. and understanding.
I like her, she is sweet and
knowledgeable, I hate saying this,
but I had a hard time
understanding her. She has a very
strong accent.I spent alot of time
just trying to understand her
instead of the meaning behind
what she was saying and learning The presentations, and what was
She didn't really cover all the the context of the material she due when, was very unorganized.
material on the test. I never really She would stay on one slide for 20- was teaching. She could have It seemed like the material and
knew where she came up with all 30 minutes and then skip to 10 allowed a little more interaction syllabus was thrown together at
the material that was on the test. slides down. The subject matter is between the students and the the last minute and the
She was fair in the grading though very interesting, I wish I would teacher that would have allowed instructions for the assignments
and helped by giving us curves. have learned more from this class. us to learn better. were not clear.
There was too much time into the
she was good but sometimes the course before we had a graded
assignments were unclear assignment
Instructor is unorganized.
The subject is personally not of an Sometimes she had difficulty
I have the same instructor for interest to me. I took the course explaining, but the content is not
another course, it pretty much is because I liked the time it was all that difficult. Again, she should
the same. Read through the offered. The materials taught are work on making her students
chapters, look over powerpoints in the book, if you miss a clas you respect her, because once they
and do the review. They are failry can easily catch uo by reading the start talking she can't make them
simple, all multiple choice. chapter. stop. more organization
hard to understand, does not
make things clear for projects and
expectations of work
Instructor is such a conformist,
cracks under pressure. Expected
more, teaching style was very
elementary instead of college
course level. Took two classes to
explain material that could have
The exams were fair. Although been explained within 5 mins.
some of the material covered on Always talked about how she
the exams were not discussed in expected more out of one's All over the place. Dates set by the
class, the information could have performance but the outline or syllabus were not very useful in
been read outside of class and was expectations of assignment were this course. The instructors
within the appropriate timeframe not very clear and most all of us in accolades are not representative
as it pertains to the course Course content was adequate but class have discussed on numerous of behavior and what you can
syllabus. not very difficult or stimulating. occasions and agree. expect in the course.
very informative and
knowledgeable.
the content is interesting, it
very open to questions, makes one realize the community
discussions. one lives in.
Istructor makes time for students
Instructor lectures are informative, Content and subject matter to ask questions and explains by
and the diffculty level of exams are relatively applies to the lectures in example questions asked in
in essays format. class. Very informative. classroom.
While the instructor is fairly
The exams were difficult in that inexperienced, i appreciated that
they were all essay, but fair. I While i thought this course would she was passionate about her
found this method of testing be somewhat boring, it proved to subject and came prepared as well
challenging but effective. be quite interesting and relevant. as being consistant.
Examinations are all written
essays, which in this course was Course content was interesting
okay because of the content and relevant, many things could be I like her uniqueness and her
required more writing. applied to the real world. diverse background. Structure was easy to follow.
good fair exams. i always feel like
im prepared. great teacher
Information was very informative
I loved the essay questions and the and allows me to look from a
ability to know possible questions different aspect on life and
in advance. surrounding communities. Enjoyed
I have learned a lot of new things
regarding the organization and
planning of communities. I have
sought out to learn more about my
own city actually I just attended a
Fair exams that actually stimulate festival that I did not know my city
understanding not just had before I took this class. Great
memorization of terms etc. community building skills were She is great, enjoyed her class very
Interesting.... introduced. much.
It was good I just have problems
writing due to Carpal Tunnel in Godd informative about getting to She really enjoy her subjects and
both wrist and tennis elbow know your community. puts effort into teaching it. It was structured very good.
good good good good
exams were purely essay exams. i
enjoyed that fact. it allowed you to
use what you learned from the
class to gain a good grade on the
test. it didn't weigh you down with
tedious memorization. these tests
showed that you actually grasp the
concepts from class, not what you very knowledgeable on the
can remember from bold print subject, but quite boring
throughout the textbook. nonetheless.
The instructor was a delight and
engaged us in conversation that
made us thinkabout the topics
A 15-20 page paper is completely
unnecessary, whether or not it is
an upper-level class. Perhaps if
this were a graduate level class or
the only class I had it would have
been more possible.
even though i enjoyed the end
the course was good, but should she was clear with her result of the group projects, they
I like the exams. I tend to do better be taught maybe with one text expectations, and overall enjoyed are hard to complete on so many
essay form book not three the class different schedules
I like her very much, think she is a
Very fair! Very good. very good professor. Fine, alot of work but very fair.
needs to maintain better control of
15 page research paper seems a the classroom. too many sidebar
bit much for a 4000 series class. conversations are distracting
She is great
Before I this course I would not
have been concerned with how Instructed was very
the community is developed. I knowledgeable regarding this
I think the exams are very time learned a lot and it has stimulated subject. She allowed us to have
consuming and should be my mind. I will now be more our own opinions which was
narrowed down for the sake of the involved in my community important. She was fair and stuck
time involved with studying. because of this class. to the syllabus. good structure
Dr. Crowe, seemed timid at the
The tests were all essay tests and Dr. Crowe presented the material beginning of the semester, but
Dr. Crowe did a good job to help of the course in various forms, all loosened up as time went on and The course is very essay heavy, but
us prepare for the tests and I of which were interesting and we got to see how very well versed still manageable and consistant to
would consider her grading fair. relevant to the course. she is in the subject matter. the subject matter.
I wasn't too psyched about this
course when I signed up for it, I really enjoyed Professor Crowe,
actually I just took it b/c I needed a for two reasons, she had a vast
soio class in that time slot, but I amount of knowledge and
I loved teh essay format for teh am so glad that I did. I found it so experince in the subject she was
exams....I think in this type of interesting and I really learned a teaching which made her a
course and subject essays are the lot about the importance of confident and animated instructor.
most benficial way to go for community and how community is and two because she allowed
students. I felt that with essays I the start of big changes in the group discussions to be productful
could explain myself and give a world. I think the informatuion and meaningful, they pertained to
better understanding of my that I learned in this course will the sunjects and she kept
knowledge of the subject. help make me a better teacher! everyone on task.
The content is relevant to the
Love the exams as essays!!! I think course. Not something I talk about Great instructor!! I would take a Great Great Great!!!! She is
they are diffucult but fair! outside of class though. course with her again!! awesome!
Difficult
Course content was relevant. Prior
to taking this course I would Instructor was respectful of
probably have run the other way everyone's opinion. Contained
when hearing about the things classroom, teaching style was
discussed in this course but after respectful. Honestly my favorite ACTUALLY FOLLOWED SYLLABUS,
taking this couse I am very class and one of the only teachers ONE OF MY INSTRUCTORS WHO
Examinations allow for us to be intrigued in the material. that stuck with the syllabus and ACTUALLY DID, sorry that was me
creative in developing our answers Ultimately the informations in this that taught in a stimulating style screaming but in amazement out
and I respect that course has given me more tools... and I loved this course of total respect...
I liked the instructor I just felt like
The exams were not that diffulcult. she should of been a little more
It was a lot of information in detail organized because we ran out of
to remember time.
Really enjoyed the essay exams
because this is a course that
requires critical thinking. However,
I would have preferred an exam
with some multiple choice and
then short answers. The essays Really enjoyed the documentary Dr. Crowe is a very smart, caring
took a lot of time to write and I videos. I thought they were woman. It's tough coming into a
always felt under pressure to interesting. Especially the one new situation but she handled it
finish. about Brazil! very well.
Dr.Crowe does her part to ensure
Interesting Class students pass her class
Although this professor had no The course structure is different in
exams per se, he did require two Race and ethnicity is all around us Dr. Arxer seems to be a young and that there are no exams, but I
major papers as well as class all the time in our society so I energetic rising star. He believe that it helped facilitate
assignments. believe that this is a relevant class. communicates particularly well. conversation.
The exams are actually research Mr. Arxer is very easy going and
papers. Very lengthy, but I like I have enjoyed learning about how sometimes too tolerant of rude
being able to research and create a race and ethnicity affect us in people. He is a very good
paper. today's society. instructor.
The intructor was very easygoing,
and well read in the subject. He
was there to help each individual
I am not interested at all in this student, although the class was
course. I was not interested in it large. I would take him again in
the first time that I took it. I think it any other course, because he
is a waste of time, and money, but made this intolerable course a bit
there were no exams. it it required. tolerable.
The instructor has to learn to
adjust to the diverse student
population that we have at UNT at
Dallas. He does not encourage
students to actively participate in
class because he does not want to
get off track.
Dr. Arxer was very stimulating at
times. He has opened my eyes to
other race and genders that I
never knew existed. I have learned
a lot in his class. I don't think
anyone could have done a better
job. If he is the teacher for another
class that is a requirement for me,
I would take his class and
recommend it to others.
I was pleasently suprized at the This instructor did an excelent job
Testing on a wide veraity of topics content of this course and the way at bringing the stuudents out to The structuure was easy to follow
is done on a weekly basis with it started me thinking in a more share ideas and had good control and the use of the syllabus was
enough time to complete each open mind to the people of the of the discution groups with adheared to so I always knew what
assignment. world. respect for each of his students. to expect.
Other than losing out on points
Course was not intersting to me and extra credit because of family
bacause I am not interested in this obligations the night before
topic. I needed an elective to thanksgiving, he was a fair
graduate. instructor
The content is very interesting. It He is very knowledgable in this
entices the student to participate subject and always prepared for
in class discussions. class!!!
Prof. Arxer is very smart and well
informed on his topic. The lectures
are interesting. The only think I
would like to change is that
student discussion is not
encouraged. When we are allowed
to discuss a topic, Prof. Arxer
seems to get anxious or frustrated
when more than 1 person wants
to say something. It's a large class
and I understand that he has to
maintain order. We're all adults
and being expected to raise our
hand for a every comment is
annoying. Especially when we're
not always called on when we
raise our hands. I think what he
might consider class disruption, we
consider normal class discussion.
Everyone is respectful to one
another during class, if we weren't
I would understand more strict
I think this course is interesting. I hand raising requirements. He's
am learning quite a bit. This course a great teacher, I just wish he
should be required by all students would lighten up a little. For most
b/c it gives another perspective of us we've worked all day, then
and all of us need to learn about go to school for 4 or 5 hours. By
other Race & Ethnic groups. Also, the time we've had 2+ hrs of
Prof Arxer's end of class lecture... it's nice to be able to
assignments do help me learn speak about the topic(if class time
more about that evening's lecture. permits).
He was a great instructor but
talked the whole class period
making the class seem somewhat
distant. A little boring at times but
he had his material together and
Powerpoints were very beneficial presented well just wish it was
and helpful. more creativity and interaction. Course was ok
The instructor can be quite rude,
and insensitive to ideas and
comments of the students
I believe Professor Arxer is a well The course structure was
Does not apply. We had research I felt this course was informative informed instructor. He is very extremely thought provoking and
papers for examination criteria. and inciteful. knowledgeable and versatile. informative.
Is good and appropriate for this
course and should be Appear to conduct them self
recommended for other courses wisely Satisfactory
I wish we would've had exams. He was excellent, especially
Unfortunately there were just daily The subject matter was not my considering that a good portion of
assignments and a couple of favorite, but the teacher did a our class were completely I enjoyed all the readings outside
heavily weighted papers. good job of making it less boring. disrespectful & ignorant. of the text.
I like the personal essay. it gave
me an ability to see in more
deeper about myself. it was good
The teacher is very smart, laid-
back, and knows his information.
Its a lot of content to take in, but There were disrespectful students
he breaks the information down in the class and he didn't take
were it makes since to the average charge enough to keep them in
person. check.
Interesting, well versed in the
Excellent and stimulating! topic and stimulating! flows very well
The instructor would refer to his
lectures as discussions but would
not allow the students to discuss
the topics or make comments. He The only main assignments were
spoke in such a way that was hard essays but i would have rather
to understand. taken a test.
VERY PROFESSIONAL, VERY
RESAERCH PAPERS WERE FAIR KNOWLEDGEABLE, HAS OPEN EXTREMELY DETAILED AND
AND VERY INFORMATIVE VERY INFORMATIVE DOOR POLICY VERY HELPFUL THOUGHT PROVOCATIVE
He is very respectful instructor. He
does not let anyone publicly speak
disrespectfully about another race,
I think that the subject matter was sex, or person. He is a very easy
interesting because he brings up person to talk to and can easily
topics that are popular now and break down the subject matter so
long ago. that it is easier to understand
I feel like I have learned the most
from this class as far as being able
to see sociological structures and
think more from a sociological
perspective. This class is very
difficult and Dr. Arxer's
expectations of understanding of
difficult concepts are high. This class is VERY difficult even
However, I have enjoyed his without exams. The amount of
The content is difficult, but very enthusiasm and very much respect reading is extreme and the papers
No exams relevant and interesting. his teaching style. are daunting.
Assigns alot of work to be done at
home rather than during course
hours.
No exams. Just papers. I enjoy
writing papers for this class Corse content is very interesting Great instructor course structure is good
this class was very good and the
professor was very fair to all of his I loved talking about all the racial I loved the instructor from
students iussed that were discussed begining to the end GREAT teacher Great class and teacher
I was very exicted about the couse
however the instructor does not
allow for much class discussion, it
would have been a more enriching Good teaching skills, but more
experience for all if he had class discussion
the instructor is professional and
knows his material well, however
he seems to serious and when
asked a question he would
respond by i can't answer that" he
relies to much on what scholars
and researchers say and doesn't
give us his opinion on things.
students were rarely given an
opportunity to debate and express
themselves in class. the professor
no quizzes or test, had 2 papers to course is really interesting, i seemed annoyed when students would like to have quizzes and
write and classroom assignments learned a lot from it. would debate about a topic." tests instead of writing papers
He's well versed on the subject
matter, but seemed a bit stand-
Very informative from both, a offish outside of class. He's a great
n/a historical and current perspective. instructor. Well structured
It was a very well taught course, it He is a very nice guy always willing
was interesting and i live the to go back and explain again if Very eye opening,of what is going
participation of the students in someone did not understand on society and country wise,
class. something. Exelent instructor. regarding race and ethnicity.
he was okay he did not allow a lot
the assisments were fair they were the course content was very of open conversation between him
relevant to the topic interesting and the students. it was a good class overall
Too lenghty --- PowerPoints are Does not let us interact much
Fair too lenghty when we have questions. Too long
The demand for these types of
courses will expand dramatically
and sooner than one expects. I believe Professor Amin is the best
With the explosion of the baby instructor for this course. Besides
The examinations are fair and boomers coming of retirement being well informed and
encompass what is discussed in age, this information and specialty knowledgeable, he is very The course structure was uniform
class. will be of great value. passionate about this concept. throughout the semester.
very good instructor, knows his
material and what he teaches in
good exams, very fair. learned new things I didn't know. class. good
The instructor takes his time and if
you don't understand something
he will do what he can to ensure The course structure is good and I
The exams are fair and if you study The course content is appropriate that you get the best possible would recommend this class and
you should do well. for this course. understanding. instructor to others.
The instructure was good, but the
The class was well taught but the way the tests were worded I found
test were difficult because of the it diffucult because he don't give The course was a good learning
wording. reviews. tool.
I feel like she is a fun teacher who
knows the material well, however I
feel that sometimes she made the
assignments difficult to
understand exactly what we were
supposed to be doing and what
was expected out of us. However I
feel that she kept that in mind in
regards to grading and taught
more on a level that ensured we
learned than submitted an
assignment based off of a
structured format. I enjoyed her
style and feel it could potentially
be very beneficial to many
different types of people.
The course content was relevant
to the course however the delivery
methods of submitting The instructor is highly passionate
assignments were unclear. grades about her field of study and This is a very interesting course
were not clearly listed in displayed enthusiasm in the that showed me how to think in
blackboard although the instructor course. However at times, there new ways. The textbooks were
graded assignments weekly. was too much information not very helpful in this course.
Group presentations were not delivered all at once. It was Much of the material in the main
relevant to the course and I do not difficult to take notes and follow textbook was outdated. The
have a lot of time to cultivate the power point presentations due secondary text was difficult to read
group relationships. I am aware to the instructor skipping from one due to the language style of the
that relationships are related to subject matter to the next. She author. As the instructor gave
the workforce but I am adult and always ensured that the class insight on the secondary text, the
already understand and have participated in discussions and story was very interested.
experienced working with people that made the class more However, it was not interesting to
in the workforce. interesting. read and follow.
Great teacher and I learned a lot of
new techniques and stategies that Awesome lesson, the materials Very open , very sound and alert to The course was structure and
I can apply to my life. were well taught. today's student. timely.
GREAT INSTRUCTOR AND REALLY
CARES FOR HER STUDENTS!!!!
Interesting learning the stages of
Very good and innovative in life and the different theories
good and relevant format regarding the stages.
She is one of the best teachers I
have had in my college career.
Professor Lacy makes everything
clear to the class, and wants to
I am very interested in this topic, make sure we understand all that
so everything that we learn in here she teaches. I loved this teacher so
is relevant to the career I want to much, I decided to take her again The structure of this course is
pursue. in the Spring. great! I love this class!
She loves to teach and she is
gonna make sure that everyone in
the class understands whats going
on.
I loved the fact that we had no
exams, and had much more fun
with the worksheets and
presentations. I think it might
Everything in this course was benefit the student if the
certainly informative and worksheets focused more on
interesting at times. I enjoyed our I would definitely recommend this personal opinion or stories than
discussions more than anything instructor to a person wanting to just on naming facts. I found
and loved hearing the viewpoints take a social work class. Although I myself only pulling information
of every member in the class. Our have no interest whatsoever in the from the book, and perhaps would
professor encouraged field of social work, I enjoyed have been more interested if there
communication and led many being taught by such an were certain questions asked
interesting discussions that I enthusiastic and knowledgeable about each age range?? Just a
thoroughly enjoyed. teacher. suggestion...
Great instructor!
Overall a good class for any
We watched too many movies in The instructor was good. Always a student to learn and improve on
the class. need for more improvement. diversities.
Good instructor, she is open to
opinions and gives great examples
couse content was interesting and of how to apply social work to
applicable to subject. everyday life. course structure was good
This instructor was well knowledge
in her course material, excited
about each class meeting. She
wanted to find out what her
students learned from the reading
of the article that were assign and
wanted to shared what she
learned from reading the article
also. Dr. Mitchell kept her students
interest with different movies she
wanted to share with them and
always wanted to her feed back
from her students from what
they've learn from those movies. I
really enjoyed the class.
Good instructor and unbias for the
most part. However, sometimes I Course structure is ok. Too much
Good topics that are very thought don't feel I can express my feelings information to be covered in a
N/A provoking. & thoughts freely. short amount of time.
Dr Mitchell was dynamic. I would
definitely advise students to take
her class. She made me see things
in different rays of light. She stuck
to her curriculum to make you
understand. She was concerned
and wanted to make sure her The course structure was great i
students understood. She was well deserving and made you
Course content realted to the impacted me! Overall great look back on life to realizes the
subject as a whole. teacher. aweness about it.
I feel that I became a better The professor made comfortable
student after this semester, and to discuss difficult topics and was
more understanding of other extremely respectful of everyone's
Examinations were fair. cultures. opinions.
n/a relevant to subject grades hard structured well
My only critique would be in
reference to the cultural
presentations. I would
Professor Mitchell is an amazing recommend decreasing the length
instructor. She is very well spoken and amount of presentations
and handles the delicate subject allowing for more class discussions
The course content is very matter with such class and around the articles in the text. I
No exams - instead there is an appropriate. I enjoyed learning respect. I would re-enroll in any of would prefer additional class
assigned large cultural about the subject matter! It was her classes. She sets expectations interaction due to the nature and
presentation very thought provoking. clearly which is very helpful. subject of this class.
She is a great instructor. It's just
some of words she contradicted
on them but other than that she is
a great teacher. The course was very interested.
She is a very nice instructor and
made the course very interesting
Ms.Mitchell is an awesome by showing a few documentaries
instructor. This class can be very that really made the real life
controversial and she keeps a very The subject matter was very situations that people go through
good climate of respect and she interesting because we learned set in your mind because you are The structure was well developed
will cut anyone off who starts about so many ethnic groups and seeing someones real life and not and she allowed enough time to
disrespecting a race, person, etc. cultures. an actor. get assignments turned in.
The instructor clearly loved
teaching this course and it was a
joy to be in her class. I learned a
The course content was diverse lot and experienced several
and informative. different cultures.
The only part of the class that I
dislike is the class grading the I did not understand the stucture
group presentations. I do not think I love the instructor. I think she has in the beginning but now I
that some of the students are Great subject contents that is a lot of knowledge and experience understand why she structured the
mature enough to grade fairly. relevant to the course. in this course. class the way she did.
Well organized and prepared. Very I loe the lack of test. Furthermore,
N/A Very in depth and eye opening knowledgeable I love substituting writing.
Course content, subject matter, Great structure! The group
and relevance of this course was Very sensitive to other cultures. presentations were awesome and
all of high standards. My She gives respect and demands really helped in diffusing
N/A expectation was met. respect from the students. stereotypes.
none. none. none. none.
The instructor was not well versed
on Blackboard, therefore, the
none, Social Research type of The course content is relevant to grades were not uploaded for
course. We had to submit a group the course subject and I was able viewing. We were however, able
presentation, self reflection esssay to learn more about other cultures to view our graded on Mondays in
and final paper due. in an interesting and creative way. class. I like the structure of the course.
It was good , however I would
The course content was good and She was very respectful and easy have like more class discussion
we had none touched on all kinds of diversity to understand than film watching.
The instructor of this course is
extremely personablel. She is very
knowledgeable about her field.
She is kind and always willing to
assist her students. She is firm in
what she asks of her students, but
ensures that we understand all
requirements. I would recommend
this instructor to anyone!
Subject matter is revelant to the
Very fair in grading procedures course Very soft spoken Could get out of hand at times
I kind of felt like the instructor
could have been a bit more
respectful of students viewpoints
and respect that they were
actually trying to be involved in
Content was clear, adherred to discussion and not just sitting
syllabus there like bumps on the log... Structure was adequate...
Professor Mitchell is awesome -- I The course structure ---to many
love her teaching style and i've papers, journals, relfections, film
learnt a lot from this class -- i love critiques and a host of others --
Interesting topics -- very the many interactions among these shoudl be limited as many
Lenghty and many papers stimulating teacher and students students are working
In my 3 years of college I can
honestly say she is the best
professor i've had. Although I will
be failing the class due to my
personal issues her dedication to
helping me through everything
went beyond a professors duties.
She cares about the subject and
the students. She really wants us
to learn and understand and she
does everything she can to make
that happen.
Because of the differing levels of
competency in the students, the
Appropriately difficult; fairly content was somewhat less than I
administered and graded; for the expected, but still a fair amount;
amount of material covered, the the subject matter was all very Very approachable and ready to
right number of tests. relevant. assist in the learning process. None.
Has a bit of an attitude and is not
It is fair, but teacher needs to Most of it was relevant to the opened to critism from her
explain further more on the topics course students It was fair.
Excellent instructor. I love her
There was one where I wish could viewpoint on the writings by the
be done over. No oppportunity to various authors. She is a
make up for a lower score. wonderful professor.
the course content goes at a nice She grades very hard... I dont think The structure is nice but the
pace at the end, but I would have that some of the work I turned in wiriting assignments can be very
like to be given more time in shouldnt have been graded so stressful because there is barely a
between the many writing harshly.. Ive received too many break between all of them.. the
If everything is studied thoroughlY assignments that we are required 89... Making a A is very very very assignments are too stuffed
exams can be easy to do... difficult together.
The course content pertain to
The exams for this course are fair, documents needed in workforce
moderate they are not that fields. Grammar and punctuations
difficult. Instructor gives review for sections are presented during
exams and prepare students semester. We research Good instructions, know about Course structure is good, really
before examinations. One could information and wrote research each topic, well prepare for each prepares student for workforce
ask questions about exams. papers base on our field of study. class. Help students when needed. related documents.
fair fair she is an excellent Instructor very busy
Dr. Warrington has helped me
with many different assignments.
There have been times where I
have sent her eails regarding
assignemnts around 10 at night,
and I have always had an email
There is a lot of assignments in this returned. She is a very good
class, but it is a lot of fun. instructor.
Dr. Warrington spoke in a loud and The material flowed from one
clear voice. She was not afraid to assignment into another. The
Every assignment was relevant to answer questions, but also assignments always related in
There was only one examination. the various aspects of technical emphasize personal responsibility, someway to the previous
However the exam was fair. writing. which I likes. assignment.
Dr. Warrington is one of the best
professors I have ever had. I loved
this course. If more professors
were like Dr. Warrington, more
people would graduate from
college. She genuinely cares about
the students learning, and knows I thought the course structure was
how to communicate her fine. There was a lot of work,
I felt the course content was knowledge to students so that it is almost too much, especially if you
The examinations were not easy, useful, the subject matter was understandable. She's obviously are a full-time student like me, but
but they were not overly difficult appropriate, and the course was very good at what she does. Dr. Warrington made the
either. very relevant. Extremely good. assignments/goals achievable.
The exam, the instructor always Her lecture are clearly stated and
review us before the exam. N/A easy to follow. N/A
THIS INSTRUCTOR SHOULD BE A
LITTLE MORE UNDERSTANDING
AND CARING TO THE STUDENTS
HARD AND A LOT TO STUDY ASSIGNMENTS WERE GOOD NEEDS AND EMERGENCY
This instructor was friendly and
available for help.
good
Leslie was very good in instructing
this course. She was highly skilled,
The content in this course was knowledgeable and she was able Very well structured. I like the
The exams were very fair and they great! It will help me in my to make the theories and concepts condensed Saturday format and I
included the covered material and interactions with individuals and come alive in a practical way in like the opportunity to work on
required us to transfer the theory my ability to work through order that I / we may have a full assignments / materials both
to practical application. disagreements and various issues. and complete understanding. inside and outside of class.
Leslie Roberts was an excellent
instructor. She was very fair, I did not think that I would enjoy
Examinations were not overly answered emails promptly, and this course but I found it to be one
difficult as long as the required explained and repeated materials of the best courses I've taken in a
reading and class participation had until students were able to long time. I wish that I would have
been done. understand! taken it during a longer term!
It was really interesting, and I liked She was very clear about the
that the scenarios we played out in material and fair with her
class were very realistic. This made expectations of us. I would love to
They were good exams, very fair it to where we could relate the take another course with her, as
and consistent witht he material material to our day to day lives she I really enjoyed her teaching
covered in class. and made it much more usable. style. I enjoyed the course.
She was a very sweet, funny, and
knowledgable instructor. It was
obvious that she knew the
material she was teaching
The amount of difficulty in this The content that was presented in thoroughly and enjoyed what she
course was very small. The work this course was relevant and was teaching to her classes. I
given was easy enough one didn't appropriate for the class. She would recommend this instructor The course structure was not of a
have to struggle to complete it. structured the class in such a way and also, state that she is a very difficult level but everything she
Even though it was easy, though, it that everything she taught enjoyable person to have in class. I taught us was relevant and
was still stimulating and pertained bcack to the subject of always looked forward to having important to exactly what we were
informational. the class. her class. supposed to be learning.
The examinations are easy if you
study for them. If not, then you
hava a difficult time.The instructor
is very clear on what is going to be
on the exams. She also gives us a
study guide that shows the She should have more hands on
material that is going to be The content of this course if activites so that people can learn a
covered on the exam. interesting. variety of ways. The structure is fine as is.
Very kind and caring. A bit dry at
Easy class, kind of dry at times. Relevant to my international times but it is probably due to the
Very interesting at other times. travels. Probably not for most. subject matter. Good as possible.
The content of this course is very I think Professor Pamela is a great
The difficulty is low in this class relevant to the course and easy to instructor and you can see her
and the instructor is very fair. follow. passion for the course.
She is a very liberal instructor and
lets us speak our opinions in class
with no problem or judgement of
what our perspectives are. I would
state that she is a very down to
Earth professor and is there to
help any student that needs the
help. She seems to get very into
her job, she seems to be very
interested in what she does, and I
know she goes very in depth with
her course. She is an excellent She went with the more traditional
instructor in her depth of role of setting up the course. She
She went through the whole book field..ART! I would really went through the whole book,
Even though examinations were and explained it very well through recommend her to my peers. chapter by chapter, from one to
pretty hard. I believe they were powerpoints and lecture. She also Another thing I liked about her is the next, until we got to the end of
fair, because they completely had put in some history with the art that she is willing to work with you the book. To make it interesting
all the material stated in class. she introduced. with anything. she threw in activities and movies.
Examinations are fair and well The course was very consistent The instructor was very easy going The course structure was easy to
explained. and somewhat interesting and easy to talk to. follow
Not prepared, even though he did
know the material. Takes too
much time to cover the first part of
There was too much content to the chapter and then rushes
Very random questions, not really cover and not enough time to go throught the rest, skipping thru Very extensive, it should be split
fair, too many quizes through it the powerpoint presentation into two courses
Do not feel like the instructor was
teaching or lecturing anything in
class and was donig it on purpose.
The test and quizes and projet We didn't do anything in class, test
were all online, we did not do and quizes were online and a
anything in class. project that was our grade.
Dr. Larson has a very relaxed
approach to teaching and does a
Straight forward and for the most good job of citing current Would have liked to see more
part consistent with the material examples that relate to the inclass hands on workshops over
covered. Revelent to the course overall. materials covereds. Access.
They are difficult if you don't Everything is interesting in that
study. class. She is fun and interesting.
Hard to much information to
remember in a small about of
time. we only went over each
chapter like 8 minutes a piece and
she expected us to know that
information that we never heard she did not have patience. she
of before. She said we was doing gave way to much information in a
the same work as her biology way that none of my classmate or
major students and I did not think myself understood. she made
that was fair at all. Fun Exciting everything difficult. Fair
She is a really good teacher but
sometimes I feel like she gives an
attitude and that's why i feel
intimidated. At times I wanted to I wish we could of presented the
say something but if i was wrong I material to the class and do more
If people really study then I think The material is good although feel like she was going to be a hands on projects since the course
they could pass the tests. more time is definitely needed. smart mouth about it. is called biology for educators.
The instructor is a good instructor.
I believe that she teaches very
effectively. I would only say that
she expects too much from us. We
cannot achive many of her
The lab class is a very good class. It expectations. But overall I like this
helps show the relationship instructor. She really knows the
No exams, only in the lecture between the material tought in material. I believe that she is a
portion of the course. lecture with lab activities. good instructor.
I give some credit to the instructor,
but I believe she was entering the
course with very little knowledge
of what she expected from us. I
believe she even admitted to
saying that she would never teach
the way she did to us. She seems
like she can be a very nice person,
but in my personal case and I'm
sure in the case of some of my
peers or most of them they would
agree that she was very rude at
times. Dr. Vise we honestly tried
and the reason why we wouldn't
speak out in class was, because we
were all strongly afraid of what
judgmental comment you would
make in regards to our answer. We
all as students had spoken to
actually speak up on behave of
this, but decided that we didn't
want to create any kind of
problem. I really do think that as
The content was there, it was just you say we need lots of
never really taught to us clearly. It improvements in the course of our
seemed like we just barely education, I strongly believe
touched base on everything and everyone as well as you have room
didn't really ever get an to improve. Also, you were never
understanding on anything. If the really direct about what you
They seemed to be effective, but subjects were to be specifically expected from us. Yes, in test you The course had a lot of
the only problem was that the chosen and maybe taught more in were, but when it came to projects information that wasn't able to be
instructor was never really clear depth it would have been better. and other work you weren't. I'm presented, because of the time
about what specific areas would Maybe even making this course not sure that you really enjoyed that we had in class. So it was
be covered in the test. Like the year around would help. Like the our group, but I really hope that pretty much impossible to talk
instructor said there is a lot of instructor mentioned there is a lot you gain a better experience with about the whole course in an
material. You cannot just be of material to cover it all in just groups to come in the future and amount as small as we had. It
general. one semester. I'm sure you will. For now I hope needs improvement.
The exams are very fair because
they are made from the It is very interesting but wish we
homework assignments she gives She is knowledgeable of the had more time to finish the whole
us. It is very interesting. subject. book!
The instructor will have a review
day for the exam. In that review
day a student will ask questions This instructor is very
and he will explain it to the whole knowledgeable in the subject, and
class. will work with students.
I am really interested in the
subject, and it presents important
Exams are appropriately difficult information pertaining to many I like the way the lectures are set
and graded fairly. different subject areas. Excellent teacher. up.
Labs are not to difficult, I believe it He is very strict on attendance and
is up to the student to make sure is very easy to approach. He is
they are available for all labs. If course content is pretty easy, always available to help, especially
you are there you will know makes the lab really fun and puts it if he notices the student trying and
everything. in everyday life situations. not slacking. The course is a little hard and fast.
Extensive, difficult and no
review.Set up for failure. Interesting Bad experioence
Not really necessary- the lab
sheets should be sufficient
evidence of whether the student
has grasped and understood the
material interesting great! GOOD
The exams are fair i have never
failed an exam. I do hear that
some classmates may complain
about the exam of couse he never
gives a review and maybe that is
something he should consider
I never really expected to like this
class, but the course content and
the instructor changed my mind. I really enjoy his teaching style.
This class was very informative.
Great professor who explains
materials in a manner that is
understandable. A lot of material to cover.
The examinations are based on
actually being able to apply the I think the instructor would make a
knowledge, not just understanding great research scientist, but she
the information. They are too does not know how to teach. 70%
difficult. I feel they are unfair I felt the course content was too of the class is failing, and she
because the instructor cannot difficult. Perhaps chemistry should insists she does not curve. It's
teach the information to the be a prerequisite. We covered a obvious she has vast knowledge, The course structure was fine,
students where they can lot of chemistry I did not she just does not know how to although the material was not
assimilate it. The amount of tests understand. I feel this class is not break concepts down to make explained on an understandable
was fine. relevant. them understandable to students. level.
The exams are not easy but check Excellent. Dr. Vise is VERY
for understanding of the vocab The course content is in depth interesting in her subject and The course structure is what I
and concepts biology makes learning biology fun would expect from a class
You made the material really easy
for me to understand and I had a
lot of fun in lab.
Dr. Gorman was a great instructor.
Tests included a fair number of He did a great job developing an
questions with a perfect balance of atmosphere for learning through
multiple choice, short answer, and discussion with only 6 students in
matching. All information on the the class which can be difficult. He
test was covered in class and treated each student's comments
discussed during the review and questions with the utmost
session when going over the respect and genuinely cared about The course structure was great
practice test. our understanding of the material. and exams were fairly spread out.
The content was fairly interesting. Dr. Gorman is a hands on teacher
The exams were easy if you did the Some things I just didn't really who explains things at a level
review. I did well on each one of think was relevant and other understandable by all. If you don't
the exams. things were more stimulating. get it, he will make sure you get it. N/A
difficult
Dr Jackson is stern, but fair. I
This course was filled with appreciated his knowledge of the
information that was expressive of subject, as well as, his overall
The exams were fair and covered drugs and the various effects they knowledge of the justice system
the course material without being have onour society. Very and how drugs play a role in our
over loaded with material. informative present society.
I think Dr. Jackson could be a more
effective professor for students if
he were more responsive to emails
and communications from
students. Taking a week to
respond to emails is not very
helpful if a student has a need. I
also would say that also to be
helpful to students would be to be Course structure was fine. This
more clear in explanations of his class was an elective in my degree
expectations for doing a research to fill hours and was not my first
paper. If he has certain selection but last minute due to
requirements then making sure scheduling conflict. I would say
Examinations were fair to those are on the ppt that he that it was nice to have it at the
everyone provides would be helpful as well. UCD center.
there are teachers who can stand
up there and state fact and repeat
the book, and there are teachers
who can share knowledge over a
tests were hard! lots of material. topic they are experienced in. Mr.
lots of chapters on each test. book Holden was definatly
was a tough read as well.test knowledgable. i learned, in our
questions were a bit specific. he class discussions, a lot about more
even let us bring a cheat cheat, than what was just in the
and still they were very difficult! textbook. he is A+
Instructor was hard to understand
many times, impatient, gave
sporadic assignments and forgot
often what assignments were The course structure was intensive
given. Chapters were not in order and hard to grasp as the instructor
Hard and sporadic, being tested on course content was too intensive when reading text and many since she was teaching it. It was
material that is not in the reviewed and difficult for a communication assignments were either irrelevant structured in a way that the
material and in other chapters that course and directions were not and too congested for this students did like the couse, but not
are not relevant to discussions. succinct. particular course. the material taught.
Exams are fairly dificult and fair, The content was great and the Course structure was okay, but
but quizzes are difficult and they assignments really helped out in She was okay and I really maybe we should have had 1
should be 10 questions instead of learning definitions of words appreciate her spending time with assignment every week instead of
7. better. us in learning this course. 2 assignments every week.
The first exam was a joke. There
were several typos and errors
contained in the questions, which
should render the questions void.
Probably the worst written The worst I have ever had. Very
questions I have seen. What hard to understand, as English is
happened with the second exam clearly not her first language. I
was unbelievable. The instructor thought seriously of dropping the
failed to post the exam online as class several times, just because of
she was supposed to. She then her poor teaching and
demanded that we all come in on communication style. Speaking of
our own time to take an exam that The course content was not that communicating, this was a
should have been taken during difficult, however, it seems as communication course. I would
class time. We are not here for though the instructor wanted it to think that someone teaching
her convenience; I have several be difficult, perhaps to seem more speech could do a little better than
other courses and a job. important. this.
She was rather brutal at first, quite
a few people were turned off by
her at first but she slowly warmed
Exams were so-so but that was up to the class and became kinder.
more on my part than her exams She's knowledgeable and her
being too difficult. She covered the lectures are interesting. Perhaps it
material that was on test but was the culture barrier? Mostly at
expected us to read the textbook the beginning I felt she should The course started out being a
and to rely on the textbook far have put her own communication class I loathed to one of my most
more than her lectures. Interesting. knowledge to work. interactive and enjoyable classes.
Everything was related to every
Exams were fair and there was a day life which made it very She knows what she's talking
fair amount of questions. interesting. about! It was fine.
At first, Dr. Kovalyova's
Communications class was the
most complicated of all the four
(4) classes that I have, but as the
semester thins out, I believe she
understands that we are extremely
communicative and that the
terminology would be the only two
(2) things that would hold us back
from receiving the most Almost in every medium in society
exceptional grade. Group and relationships, communication
assignments are much better in is inevitable. There is no other way Dr. Kovalyova is funny along with The course structure is a mite
her class than the other three around it and the course is intelligent, and brings humor to inconveniencing with a five (5)
(3)and we actually have fun while extremely important paralleling the class. I feel extremely vibrant hour opening in between but I like
not trying to have fun. with math/money. after attending her class and I the class and do not mind getting
Participation is the number one Communication will always be and think she brings flavor with her extra work done or taking a nap in
(#1)item in this class. is the way we live our lives. Russian accent. the spare time.
I was initially intimidated by the The course content was relevant
online test timer thinking that I and will have significant impact on Dr. Patton's teaching was
only had 20 seconds per question. my graduate studies. I have professional, flexible and relevant.
That had great impact on my learned some valuable skills for my She made expectations very clear
performance of the first test. own businesses as well as for and was available and accessible The structure of this was clear and
Overall the tests were fair. being a professional student. for questions. relevant.
teacher was great, but needs to
testing was online, which was very there could've been more speak louder and with more
convenient supplemental materials used enthusiam to keep students awake no comment
She's very knowledgeable about
the course content and she was
always there to help us when we
needed it or didn't understand
something.
Experience and hands on learning
would improve the course greatly.
Experiencing grant writing besides More hands on experience is
within a group, where none of us preferable. Experience working on
Tests were fairly easy if you have any experience, would be She is very interested in each of a project and writing a grant for
studied and knew the material. I extremely beneficial. This course if her students. She ensures each that project specifically would
would have preferred more than relative to my degree, as well as student is grasping the material, make it much easier to grasp
two tests, in case I'd had trouble the degree of anyone pursuing a and will discuss a subject until all concepts and retain the
with any of the material. career in a helping profession. students understand it. information taught.
She will be great! I appreciate her
WONDERFUL! Great! transition!
fair subject matter relevant very knowlegdeable about subject
The instructor may mean well
when giving feedback but can
come off as rude and abrasive.
Some of this may have to do with
transition, different styles of
teaching and his personality.
Towards the latter classes there
was a shift and he was not as
abrasive. I think it was difficult for
All the content was relevant but all parties to deal with the change
next semester there should be of instructors, and how the
more preparation in the program is run. It was not a
paperwork/notes and what to smooth transition which just
expect in Internship. added more stress on everyone.
This instructor is very rude,
condescending, spiteful, strongly
opinionated, and pushes his own
personal agenda. Dr. Green simply
does not know how to talk to
people in a respectful and decent
The required Professional manner. Moreover he uses his
Counseling Performance power to control people, and
Evaluation (PCPE) Practicum (that influence decisions unfairly. Many
was to be filled out twice as both a times I found myself consoling
mid-term and final grade) was not practicum peers from how he
fair because students were handled supervision and
instructed to fill out the PCPE conversations with me, and other
based on their own" evaluation of students. I have had to see a
themselves, and then the counselor myself as a result of his
instructor would provide their treatment and unfair decisions. It
evaluation of us - and discuss is fine to be direct and to the
collaboratively. However, when point, but not where 98% of the
the PCPE was submitted, I was class dreads coming each week
asked to change my scores of 2 to because of his non-tactfulness. He
a "0" or "1" because the constantly talks about
"professor" did not feel I should professionalism and ethics, but he
have rated myself that high (3 himself is not ethical or
being the highest). This is not fair. professional many times (in my
If it is "my" evaluation, then I opinion). I earned an undergrad
should rate it how "I" view myself. degree from UNT Denton, Masters
If there is a discrepancy on the at UNT Dallas, and am currently in
PCPE filled out by the professor, the last stages of this Masters -
that is fine. But it shouldn't be a and this is the ONLY instructor and
requirement that I change how "I" experience that I have EVER been
feel. Furthermore, when I change subjected to such emotional,
it. My Triadic supervisor asked me academic and verbal abuse in my
why I rated myself so though - and academic career with the
then put on another performance university. We all need
evaluation that I lack confidence. constructive and sometimes
This entire matter in how this was critical feedback. But it boils to
handled was totally unfair." how you go about doing so,
Dr. Green has made a difference in It has been an interesting
my life for the best. He came to transition for Prac. students this
UNT-D at a time where I was in semester with all of the changes
need of guidance and that have taken place this year. I
This course has been challenging development when I was on my believe that all of the new
but fair. It has been a time for way out of the program. I am faculty/staff have done an
growth and learning and Dr. Green thankful for his feedback and outstanding job of trying to make
has supported me in that. direction when I needed it most. things run smoothly this first year.
This instructor is my most
The course content was difficult understanding and helpful
but the instructor made all the preffesors I have ever had the The course structure was very
The test review were very helpful difference pleasure of taking his class clear
If you study and take time to go
over anything you don't
understand with him you should
pass them He is GREAT!
Easy Easy Good professor
I like his class but I think his course
can be confusing because there's
so many sources of information.
first his lectures, then hawkes
learning modules (they do some of Practice and homework are useful
the assignments differently to the but I think in this course there is
They are hard!!! but at least he the content is hard and teacher's methods)and third, the too much work, lecture, tests,
provides the tools to make them complicated but is important and book. so i can be easily all tangle quizzes, posts test and hawkes
do-able very useful. up. modules.
Exams are Great! Great! Open for questions at all time! Great!
Dr. Friesen goes beyond perhaps
what the average professor would
all information on test has been to make himself accessible,
adequately covered in class or relevant not sure how useful or approachable, and explicable
class assignments and you know how to relate to practical when it comes to understanding
what to expect experience the course content structure of course is adequate
He is brilliant. He knows every
formula in the entire book by
heart. He even knows what pages
to find certain formulas without
fair but challenging The textbook is horrible. even looking it up.
I wish that we covered more
questions and more examples in I think that he is a excellent
they are fair but difficult could class, subject matter was difficult instructor and would
have more questions. more me to grasp. recommended him to everyone. not really
He does a great job. I enjoy his
Interesting material. I learned alot class.
Dr. Friesen knows the subject and
can teach it. He helps the class
understand the contents he
teaches. I plan on taking one of his
Exams are a little challenging. classes next semester.
The content of this course is good
gives us enough time to learn the
Test are good very similar to the material and get tested on it. The
review he gives us and enable us notes help us to understand the He is a good instructor, he truly
to pass with an A. material clearly. knows the material of statistics.
course is difficult but fair great instructor
I really enjoy this professor. He is
so incredibly helpful through email
and during his office hours. I really
appreciate how he cares for his
students and their success.
great instructor. will and do
difficult but makes you think relevant recommend. is great perfect
There is a lot of different types of
assignments from mandatory
Exams are very difficult, but if you Dr. Freissen is very passionate hmwk, quizzes, tests, and excel
do all of the assigned hmwk and about DSCI, I have already signed assignments. This allows you to
attend the lectures they aren't up for his 3710 class next get a better understanding of the
horrible. Very in depth course content. semester! He is a great professor. course material.
The size of the class is great the The instructor is fair to everybody
only problem is the classroom we and not only that but explains the
do not have a computer lab and in material in a way that I understand
some of the chapters was needed it.He also answers questions in a
it. well manage manner.
He is passionate about this course.
He always try to tell different
stories that pertain to the lesson
so that the students have a better
understanding of the topic being
The exams were fair. discussed.
Mr. Hallet always came to class
prepared. He never missed a beat.
He knows what he is talking about.
He is very intelligent beyond his
years. Hek, I wouldnt mind having
Course content on the Bankning him as a mentor for the rest of my
Exams are difficult. YOU MUST and Regulations was very life. He is really great! I am
STUDY! I must say the final was a interesting. Mr. Hallet knows this disappointed to dicover he teaches
bit long, but overall fair and hard. subject matter very well. I would only finance & economics since my Very structured and laid out. Mr.
Creates challenging material to recommend a student learn this major is accounting. He is an asset Hallet kept you on your toes all
keep you on top of the course all information from him. He is the to the university and any future semester that is for sure. You have
semester. best from my point of view. students who take him. an inclass exam every week.
The instructor is very
knowledgeable and helpful in this
The exams were fair. They covered subject. He always had a story to
everything we went over in class tell us to better explain the
and everything that was on the Content is very relevant to my material. I will be taking another Course structure is fine. Wish he
review. degree and current events. course by him next semester. would teach in Denton.
exams are fair. excellent instructor
if you attend class exams are quite Interesting mixture of knowledge
easy and cultures it is just fine as it is
While I liked Mr. Hallett as an
instructor because he has a good
deamnor with the class however,
he could be more effective with
students if he is going to continue
using weekly quizes as a tool for
the mid-term and final exams,
then do not change the wording
up. Some students will study
exactly what the questions are
along with the answers that have
been discussed in class and then if
the questions on the exams are
worded differntly, I then fail to
understand how that helps me
learn as a student. Overall, he is
very knowledgeable of material
and made a boring subject
Mr. Hallett was fair in grading. interesting.
It is a little bit hard to understand
There are two midterms and a the professor at first. I felt that he
final and the difficulty is This course is important because was going too fast in the lecture,
reasonable. The professor explains we can now understand I little bit but after a while it got easier to
the material that would be more the news about the understand him and I even found
covered in the exam. economy. the class very interesting.
The class was not difficult at all I feel that the content was very I think this course was course was
with the assistant of my professor. relevant and will assist me in my structured well for a beginner
He made the course very easy to future goals of becoming a He was very helpful and class, it wasn't a overload of
understand. principal. informative. information.
The course content is very relevant
to my future career goals and I
have a greater understanding of Wonderful instructor with a great
school management, finance, and sense of humor. I hope to have
personnel issues. him for another course.
He's articulate and able to
Applicable to what I needed to communicate well. He is
know and followed the course respectful when speaking to us
They were fair. syllabus. and gives good feedback.
Dr. Dunlop is a very fair instructor.
The class was very interesting. The Every class he shared a current
course work was fair. It was a must article or had a current discussion
that you are present in class and about what was going on in the
turn in assignments correct and on field of education. He was very
time. interesting.
He cares about his students and is
passionate about educational
We did not have any formal tests; It was good info to know, but very issues. He is very lively and keeps We did not always follow the
they were all group projects. confusing! your attention. syllabus, but I was OK with that.
The instructor provided a lot of
real world experience and allowed
I feel that activities and us to participate in role-play. The
Instructor made examination fair, assignments will be beneficial to instructor had us to work in groups
as the exams reflected material me when I begin my career as an which helped us to form bonds
that was covered in class. administrator. with other classmates.
Dr. Dunlop did an excellent job in
teaching us the basic finance of
school while introducing us to real
life budget examples and problems
with budgeting. He took into
regard that we all work and was
very fair with our deadlines. He
made the course interesting and
fun!
THE INSTRUCTOR KNOWS HIS
SUBJECT
The content is what is needed and
The exams are appropriate. expected. Very fair. logical
The instructor is very
knowledgeable about the
education field. I value the
Examinations were project-based The subject matter covered in this information provided and
and were relevant to the type of course is beneficial to those who appreciate the fact that he was
work that would be required of me want to pursue a degree in able to do it from both a teacher
after completion of my degree. Education Administration. and an administrative position.
Content and subject matter at
Exams were appropriate for time diverted based on class He gave real-life" practical
material. participation. experience." Allowed for active participation.
The instructor created a
harmonious environment of
learning by building relationships
with students quickly. I mostly
enjoyed his speaking of issues he
faced as an administrator.
Too many article critiques take
away time that could be focused
on the projects which were
EXCELLENT assignments.
It would be greatly appreciated if
Dr. Ortloff provided more clear
and specific instructions about all
assignments.
Very busy, but gave an adequate
picture of the life of an Okay, needs to probably be spread
Fair. administrator out over two semesters.
Very pertinent information offered
in this course that will be helpful Very knowledgable about subject I like the small group setting this
N/A when I become an administrator. matter. class offers.
made it flexible for everyone. took
required for my major. course very enthusiastic about the the time to explain if something
A bit confusing. content was clear. subject. showed great interest. was not clear the firs time.
The midterm study guide was not
explained in form of the test. The
scoring of the midterm was very
misguided. The final exam came
from Denton and when asked
about the instructor said she has
not taken the time to really look at
it. And when she did, she made Subject matter was always on task
the comment that it was to easy and relevant to the course.
and she would be adding to it. However, the instructor did have a The structure was poor and the
Very unfair with course exam tendency to divert from the daily students handed in their own
content. topic. grade at the end of the semester.
fairness good material I learn a lot very good instructor clear knowledgeable
I did not feel like I was a part of
this class. It seemed to be more The course cotained some some
for the Spanish students. I felt like good information and it made me
No Comment. No Comment. it was a waste of time. more culturally aware.
she is always late to class, about 5
to 10 minutes each class but i
know she is coming from another
school, so that understandable but
well taught, a lot of great discuss she dismiss the class after class
the test was very difficult in class hours a lot of the time. everything was great
Should stay more on topic
pertaining the syllabus and not Easy at first but then overwhelmed
modify it so much. at the end.
Dr. Walker, Is a fantastic professor
that I was fortunate to have as my
This course has taught real life professor. I learned valuable
situations that I will encounter information that will help me in
while at work. I learned valuable passing the teacher certification
tips that I will use in my future exam. She makes the class
fair classroom. engaging and interesting. The course structure is excellent.
Loved this instructor, very
personable. Would love to have
her again in the future.
course content was well explained
by the instructor. Prof. Walker
introdeced the materail in a way Prof. Wlker is a wonderful,kind
test were challenging, but duable that everybody would undestand. and undestanding human being.
Pretty easy flow and not
It is a pretty fair class that I liked the classroom environment overwhelming which is good.
depending on what you want to where everyone is able to speak I liked the style of teaching, Assignments can be done in a
get out of it is how much you are out on what we think and a lot of lecture, assignments, and overall matter of time and are given
willing to work for. group participation. the classroom. enough time.
Mrs. Walker is a great instructor. I
really enjoyed her lectures
because she is very enthusiatic
about the material she teaches.
Mrs Walker made the material
very relevent by bringing in many
real life examples. She has a lot of
experience and she relates those
experiences into the lesson she
teaches and I find that very
helpful. In addition, Mrs Walker
has a very personable personality.
I really enjoyed the course She is very positive and made the
The exams for this class were very content,I have gained a lot of classroom discussions very
difficult, but fair. I really think that knowledge from it that I believe relatable. I would defenetly
it will help us when we take the will help me become a more recomend Mrs Walker to other
state exams. informed teacher. students
I would not take this instructor
again nor would I reccommend her The entire structure needs to be
Examinations were difficult but fair Content was not at all stimulating for anything! reevaluated
Mrs. Pena would have been a
better professor if she was more
prepared to teach this course.
Methods courses are very
demanding and it requires a good
teacher to give students the
There was only one exam given in needed strategies to pass the state
this course. I was relevant to the exam and teach science
course. successfully in the field.
I believe the instructor know the
content very well but did not know
how to apply it to senior level
education students. I felt that she
thought she could teach us as if we
were in middle school and not as
her soon to be colleague. I did not
feel that I was treated with respect
even though I treated her with
respect. This was an education
methods course not a content
course and I don't think this
professor knew what she was
getting into. The syllabus was not
written by her and she did not
know how to explain to us what
was on the syllabus, because she
had not read it herself. Our
information regarding assignments
was given second hand because
she could not answer the question,
so we had to wait until she talked
to her friend" the science teacher
from the other Cadre. I thought
that was unacceptable, and when
we tried to approach her as a class
regarding our concerns she did not
like it. She was not willing to make
changes at all. I do not feel that
Mrs. Pena was ready to teach at
There was only one exam given this level and it was a disservice to
and it