Sample Conceptual Framework Computer Based Assessment
W
Description
Sample Conceptual Framework Computer Based Assessment document sample
Document Sample


Computer-based and computer-
assisted tests to assess
procedural and conceptual
knowledge
Richard C. Rayne and Glenn Baggott
School of Biological and Chemical Sciences
Birkbeck College, University of London, WC1E 7HX, UK
r.rayne@bbk.ac.uk
Pedagogical Problem…
• Biosciences are essentially practical
and experimental subjects
• Biosciences undergraduates therefore
must develop abilities to:
– acquire and apply procedural knowledge
– demonstrate understanding of concepts
that underpin procedures
– use procedural knowledge in appropriate
contexts; i.e. to develop strategic
knowledge within the domain
Knowledge framework
c.f. Shavelson et al. (2002) EARLI/Northumbria Conference keynote address
Declarative knowledge…
• “Knowing that…”
– a fact-base, or knowledge store
Procedural knowledge…
• “Knowing how to do something”
• Consists of…
– if/then rules
– sequence of steps
• Calls upon…
– declarative knowledge
Schematic knowledge…
• Having a scientifically justifiable
conception, i.e. “knowing why”
• May be used to…
– interpret problems
– troubleshoot
– explain an outcome
– predict an outcome
• Depends on…
– having an understanding of principles
• “conceptual knowledge” = combination of declarative
and procedural knowledge
Strategic knowledge…
• Knowing when, where and how to
use certain types of knowledge in a
new situation
– conditional knowledge, strategies
• what strategic knowledge is applicable here?
– essential for solving new problems
“Conceptual knowledge”…*
• a subset of schematic knowledge
– taken to equate to “understanding the
basis for a particular procedure”
* as I have used in the abstract
Knowledge framework
c.f. Shavelson et al. (2002) EARLI/Northumbria Conference keynote address
A key aim…
• Exploit the strengths of CBA to
promote development of procedural
and conceptual knowledge in
biosciences students
• Context…
– first-year module: Molecular Cell
Biology
– using “case-based” approaches in
different forms
Two Approaches
• TRIADS CBA focusing on a “classic
experiment”
– Meselson-Stahl experiment: outcome simple,
but to appreciate its power requires
understanding of several sophisticated
principles
• CaseIT! simulation software
– to teach and assess procedural and
conceptual knowledge of key molecular
biology techniques
– http://www.uwrf.edu/caseit/caseit.html
CaseIT!
• Virtual molecular biology lab
– “apparatus” for performing separation
of DNA fragments and for
identification of specific DNA
sequences
– apply molecular biology techniques in
the context of a case study of human
genetic disease
• must perform a Southern blot…
Southern Blot Procedure
• Component tasks
– obtain DNA sample and select enzyme
– perform reaction to digest the DNA
– load sample onto electrophoresis gel
– run gel; stain and destain
– transfer DNA from gel to a membrane
– select radioactive hybridisation probe
and apply to membrane
– reveal specific DNA sequences by
exposing membrane to X-ray film
Movie
• CaseIT in action
Computer-Assisted Test
• t0 = Introduction to techniques and to
CaseIT! (demonstrated in lecture)
• t+1 = Classroom session, hands-on (3 h)
– students work on cases involving Southern
blotting as the key technique
• t+5= Test session
– paper-based test with unseen case
– must use CaseIT to obtain results
– test items (short answer responses) depend
on correctly performing Southern blot
Why did we do it?
• History
– In 2002, only 4 of 40 students correctly answered an
item on a TRIADS exam which required understanding
of the Southern blot procedure
– For 2003, we devised and used the CaseIT test; it was
used again in 2004
• CaseIT! Test Results
– 2003 & 2004: extremely poor on the whole
• 2004 mean = 42%
• 30 of 66 got <35%!
– but 61 of 66 (in 2004) were able to perform the Southern
blot procedure correctly
• TRIADS Item, 2004
– 18 of 57 scored 100%
Southern blot TRIADS item
Summary
• CaseIT! provides a reasonably realistic
analogue of “real” lab techniques
– helps build understanding of rationale/
approach in “fail-safe” environment
• The CaseIT! test “forced” students to learn
blot procedure!
– have to learn a logical sequence of procedures
that mimics the learning required in the “real”
situation
• CAA/CBA need not be a “test given on a
computer”
Acknowledgements
• Funding:
– Birkbeck College Development Fund
– Higher Education Funding Council of England (HEFCE)
through FDTL4
• People at Birkbeck:
– Authorware Programmers: Dijana Maric, Ellen McCarthy,
Caroline Pellet-Many
• People elsewhere:
– Don Mackenzie and his team at the Centre for Interactive
Assessment Development, University of Derby
– Mark Bergland, author of CaseIT!, University of
Wisconsin-River Falls
References
Bergland M., et al. (2004) DNA Electrophoresis Module for
CaseIT!, version 4.0.2. http://www.uwrf.edu/caseit/caseit.html
Shavelson, R.J., Li, M., and Ruiz-Primo, M.A. (2002) Evaluating
new approaches to assessing learning. Keynote address to
the Joint Northumbria/EARLI Assessment Conference,
Newcastle, UK. August 2002.
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/SEAL/Presentation/Presentation.htm
Contact
• Dr Richard Rayne
– Lecturer in Biology and Director of the OLAAF Project
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences
Birkbeck College
University of London
Malet Street
London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7631-6253
r.rayne@bbk.ac.uk
• OLAAF web site:
– http://www.bbk.ac.uk/olaaf/
Meselson-Stahl Experiment
• Outcome:
– DNA replication is semi-conservative in
bacteria
• Component knowledge/understanding
required to understand the experiment:
– what is an isotope?
– what is density?
– how does a centrifuge work?
– how to separate molecules based on their
density? (density gradient centrifugation)
TRIADS CBA
• 2004: text and supplementary written materials
provided
– 5 items on TRIADS exam; 1 comprehension +
2 application + 2 problem solving
• 2005: TRIADS tutorial to replace (or
supplement) the paper materials
– uses animations to demonstrate concepts visually
– will test basic understanding at “component level” (i.e.
concept-by-concept)
• Recall Qs precede Comprehension Qs
• Achievement: must answer lower level to proceed
– same items as in 2004 to be used on exam to probe
conceptual understanding
M-S 1.1
M-S 1.2
M-S 1.3
M-S 2.1
M-S 2.2
M-S 2.3
M-S 3.1
M-S 3.2
M-S 3.3
M-S 4.1
M-S 4.2
M-S 4.3
M-S 5.1
M-S 5.2
M-S 5.3
Assessment Development Model
Cognitive type inventory
• ReCAP*
– Recall
– Comprehension
– Application
– Problem solving
(= analysis + synthesis + evaluation)
* Imrie (1995) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 20 (2): 175-
189.
Southern blot item 2
Related docs
Other docs by qzk17655
Sample Conference Program Please contact TWC for our special group pricing Day One Day Two Day Three
Views: 116 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "