Gary Joseph Bonas II 23255 Bungalow Court Valencia, California 91355 This morning, 09-19-08, which Ms. Feinstein left me a personal message on my 661714-4011 private/work line, which message in total reads, verbatim: Hello Ms. Cooper, This is Joe Leberonie from Senator Dianne Feinstein’s office. Um, I need you to fax in a form that actually says what the federal agency involved is. I can’t get it from the letters that you wrote. I can’t see where you mention it, the specific federal agency involved and besides that I know you said on the privacy release form to look at your CD, but We are not allowed to print CD’s sent into the Senator’s office from constituents. We are not allowed to put them into government computers. I think you can understand the reasons why. So, if you wouldn’t mind faxing in or mailing in another privacy release form or just a sheet of paper with your name and contact info and the actual federal agency involved it would be greatly appreciated. [End Transcript] We responded, by regular mail the very same day of the call, in our 09-19-09 legal mail to the Honorable Senator Feinstein, identifying exactly the federal agency involved, verbatim: A. [I]t's a ... transfer program ... the federal government has in cooperating with the states. -- "the [MAX] WIC price [not lawful cost pricing, of] ... cereal tends to be the barometer for … prices."1
Exactly six days later, 09-25-08, I the honorable senator dated and signed a letter to me, Gary Joseph Bonas II, not Ms. Cooper, who is the only one at this point who communicated with the senator about the identified matters. In response to Ms. Cooper’s correspondence, Senator Feinstein shifted and wrote to me, after perusing the contents of the CD, “off the government computers”. Gary Joseph Bonas II 23255 Bungalow Court Valencia, California 91355 January 17, 2009 Senator Barbara Boxer 312 N. Spring Street, Suite 1748 Los Angeles, CA 90012
1
Senator Dianne Feinstein United States Intel Committee One Post Street, Suite 2450 San Francisco, Calif. 94104
KEN ELZINGA T&T, @4140:-4141:4.
1
Greetings Senator Feinstein: This is a brief response to your request for my personal authorization to begin an investigation regarding my past 8 years and my INDSIDE JOB before and during the Bush Reign and explanation for my delay in granting you my authorization in that regard. First, a brief dated correspondence timeline of the sequence our debriefings is in order, beginning with our first correspondence (with some gaps) & ending with the last for the record: Ex Ex Ex Ex Ex Ex 05-21-08 06-27-08 07-08-08 07-23-08 08-08-08 09-19-08 A) B) C) D) E) F) Ex Cooper’s B.B. Debriefing - The Honorable Senator Feinstein Senator Feinstein To Cooper About IT, Checking Arnold S. 1st Cooper To Senator Feinstein, Thank You For The Jurisdiction Bonas To Senator Feinstein Re: State Troop Problem & My Alias’ Senator Feinstein To Cooper, Taking Over From Arnold S. Power Senator Feinstein Calls Cooper’s Line (Joe Leberonie (SP?), verbatim:
Hello Ms. Cooper, This is Joe Leberonie from Senator Dianne Feinstein’s office. We are not allowed to print CDs sent into the Senator’s office; We are not allowed to put them into government computers; Um, I need you to fax in a form that actually says what the … agency involved is. I can’t get it from the letters that you wrote. Us To Senator Feinstein, Identifying the Agency(s) involment:
09-19-08
[I]t's a ... [money laundering] transfer program ... the [agency] … has in cooperating with the [governors A-Z, some mayors, all DAs - local troops, called] states. -- "the [MAX] WIC price [not lawful cost pricing – USC 1983] ...."2 Ex 09-25-09 A) B) C) D) E) Ex Senator Feinstein directly To Gary Joseph Bonas II, verbatim:
I understand your concern; I will … do all that I can to help; [B]efore I can begin my inquiry, I need a privacy release form [aka, I need express written authorization from you, Mr. Bonas]; As soon as we receive it, we will go to work on your case; & I look forward to hearing from you [Mr. Bonas]. Senator Boxer To Bonas, Two Page Details 700 (G-BUSH) Thanks
10-10-08
Second, the current intelligence contained on the enclosed CD provides more details to assist our honorable Senate, Judiciary and the first family with the new transition. Third, I have been working with a wonderful group of people, serving here in Valencia. I have enclosed some of the proof in that regard. Related to that, I have a very, very dear friend who would like direct access to his small business grant money to build his own restaurant. He,
2
The Agency’s Dr. Ken Elzinga, Trial Transcript Transporter, at page 4140:-4141:4. 2
like Nina & Ms. Cooper, in my view, based on firsthand experience with him, isa most worthy person; his strength of character has been personally confirmed to me, which fits this criteria: A Woman (or Man) of Good Character..... A Student of Fair Ability......... With Ambitious Purposes........... A Congenial Disposition........... Possessed of Good Morals.......... Having a High Sense of Honor and A Deep Sense of Personal Responsibility3 Accepting Of & Not Judging Different Temperaments, Talents & ConVictions We would like to do that together. Given the current state of things, We’d sure appreciate access to our grant funds, e.g., as soon as possible. Fourth, in part, to explain my delay in personally authorizing the Honorable Senator in opening her “open to the public” formal investigation about IT & me, the last reign is now over, which was the key factor in not extending my authorization in a more timely way. I’ve attached, hard copy, some past and current “bits of proof” relating to the double jeopardy play set in motion on April 5, 2001 by both Bush Senior and Junior’s agents, four days before the “IT Pelican Brief” was due, including: A) B) C) D) E) Bush-Stone Partners Plot to To File Split Double Jeopardy Actions against me Bush-Stone Cheng Calculating To Subvert Removal & Joinder Owed Process Bush-Stone Russi Team lying to the Central District About It (Page 26 & 25) Stone-Noonan’s Bush Bribing Judge Mud et al To Pretend A ConViction is Stone-Noonan Bush’s Bar intentionally publishing fiction about Me & It
Fifth, for those who don’t yet know, There Is No Plea Because A Judge Is Banished From Being A Party. There Is No Plea Contract Because Two Parties Must Sign IT. There is No Conviction Because The Plea Is Missing Mogin, Noonan & Lerach’s Signature, and I know they won’t argue that Judge Mud was their Attorney, and not D.A. Carol Buck, who didn’t want her signature on it and a whole lot other papers she filed, by fraud, like Paul Phingst, who communicated (telephone lines) with A.G. in the relevant time frame. Indeed, the facts are sealed, like these gentlemen did when they secretly filed their action “under seal” against me, pretending that they held a grand jury, which is a dirty fraud set in motion by both the players and the court: Fraud [by the Private Reserve Republic’s Bar Christian inquisition courts] … occurs when “a [Court, Esq.] party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the [United] judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter . . . .”4 It requires “the most egregious conduct involving a
3
4
The Jordan Standard
3
Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989); Geo. P. Reintjes Co., Inc. v. Riley Stoker Corp., 71 F.3d 44, 48 n.5 (1st Cir. 1995).
corruption of the judicial process itself.”5 The courts’ power to deal with such fraud is inherent and rooted in equity, for courts “cannot lack the power to defend their integrity against unscrupulous marauders . . . .”6 Sixth, the following “cut & pasted” analysis might the honorable Senate fit a “clean up” brief targeting the Regional Reserve Bar, Inc’s operatives Jeff Bliech, Charles Murry, Dan Barrios & Joanne Remke, Sheldon Sloan among others who kindly put their names on papers confirming their own “open court” confession. A. And [in] the [Bar, Inc.] cartels that I know of … nobody wants to be the enforcer because it's so costly. Everybody says, "That would be a great idea. You do it over there, or you do it over here. "And so … [10th Amen desertion] enforcement gets done, if one firm does it, it may get a side payment from the others for doing it, or else they all do it. And so this is ….7 That's point number one. [T]he … policing measure against a [non Cartel conforming member] … in the cartel ….8 [S]econdly, and more … pertinently, when somebody [like Cash] refuses to play ball with Bar, Inc. Cartel leaders] … and a [D-Bar] cartel is a potent one, an objective one and there's deterrents, then they learn their lesson and they stop [playing ball] ....9
A. A.
(a)
The [Bar backed] schedule and its [slander & libel] enforcement mechanism constitute price-fixing, since the record shows that the schedule, rather than being purely advisory, operated as a fixed, rigid price floor. The … schedule was enforced through [forbidden] discipline by [Remke] the State Bar [Inc.] ….10 Warmest Regards, Gary Joseph Bonas II
5
Roger Edwards, LLC v. Fiddes & Son Ltd., 427 F.3d 129, 133 (1st Cir. 2005) (quoting 11 Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2870 (2d ed. 1995)). 6 Aoude, 892 F.2d at 1119. 7 Bush’s Cartel Meister, Dr. Ken Elzinga, trial testimony at page 4033:17-24. 8 Bush’s Cartel Meister Dr. Ken Elzinga, trial testimony at page 4033:27-28. 9 Bush’s Cartel Meister Elzinga, trial testimony at page 4034:3-6. 10 State Bar, 421 U. S. 773 (1975).
4