CAMS Annual Users Conference Attendee s Evaluation

CAMS Annual Users' Conference, June 11, 2002 Attendee's Evaluation Summary of non-breakout related evaluation items Number of Evaluations Strongly Agree (5) 26 26 52 87 Strongly Disagree (1) 1 0 1 Conference Structure The Conference objective were clearly defined The Conference objective were fulfilled Agree (4) 49 46 95 Neutral (3) 6 10 16 Disagree (2) 4 1 5 Doesn't Apply (0) 0 0 0 Total No Response Average 86 83 169 1 4 5 4.10 4.17 4.14 Total Conference Content The material covered was what I expected The material covered was elevant to my job. The information was helpful and pertinent to the conference. The conference materials were useful. 23 45 15 3 0 0 86 1 4.02 24 35 16 3 1 3 82 5 3.99 26 44 8 2 2 0 82 5 4.10 23 51 7 2 1 0 84 3 4.11 4.05 Total 96 175 46 10 4 3 334 14 Facilities The facility was appropriate for the Conference Strongly Agree (5) 35 Agree (4) 45 Neutral (3) 1 Disagree (2) 3 Strongly Disagree (1) 0 Doesn't Apply (0) 0 Total 84 No Response 3 Average 4.33 Overall Assessment Rating the Conference Rating of Speaker I Rating of Speaker II Strongly Agree (5) 20 22 31 Agree (4) 33 28 23 84 Neutral (3) 18 11 10 39 Disagree (2) 1 8 2 11 Strongly Disagree (1) 2 3 0 5 Doesn't Apply (0) 0 3 0 0 Total 74 72 66 212 No Response 13 15 21 49 Average 3.92 3.81 4.26 3.99 Total 73 Do you think the Conference could be improved Yes 50 No 4 No Comment 33 Do you think the Conference Was Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:42 AM Too Long 15 Just Right 48 Too Short 1 Page 1