Roi on Training Feedback Template - DOC
Description
Roi on Training Feedback Template document sample
Document Sample


Initiative Overview
1. Name GWDC ROI Initiative – Phase I
2. End Date June 25, 2010
Name Phone # E-mail Address
Bryan Lindsley 651-259-7572 bryan.lindsley@state.mn.us
3. Sponsor
4. Project 651.259.7581 cristine.leavitt@state.mn.us
Cristine Leavitt
Manager
5. Process Cheryl Kartes kartes@aol.com
Facilitator
6. Committee Paul Anton Paa2@wilder.org
Members Art Berman ahberman@twincitiesrise.org
Mark Brinda 612-673-6231 mark.brinda@ci.minneapolis.mn.us
Susan Carter Susan.carter@so.mnscu.edu
Carol Dombek carol.dombek@state.mn.us
Jeremy Estenson jestenson@mnchamber.com
Martha Hegewisch martha.hegewisch@state.mn.us
Richard Joerger Richard.joerger@so.mnscu.edu
Randy Johnson rjohnson@wfdi.ws
Susan Lindoo susan.lindoo@state.mn.us
Nick Maryns Nicholas.maryns@state.mn.us
Devon Meade Meaded@unitedwaytwincities.org
Anne Olson aolson@mncounties.org
Brian Paulson paulsonb@unitedwaytwincities.org
Raymond Robertson robertson@macalester.edu
Mary Rothchild mary.rothchild@so.mnscu.edu
Deb Serum deb.serum@state.mn.us
Joann Simser joann.simser@so.mnscu.edu
Todd Wagner todd.wagner@state.mn.us
Luke Weisberg Weisberg@lukeworks.net
7. Scope, Purpose, Objectives, and Deliverables (to be refined by committee members)
Scope: Minnesota workforce development training and employment programs.
Purpose: To pool our shared knowledge and expertise to create through consensus a
standard return on investment methodology for workforce training and employment programs
that meets the objectives below by June 2010.
Objectives:
1. ROI Committee members agree on what success looks like for the ROI Initiative and
are committed to the success of the initiative and the objectives.
2. Clarity on how and who will make decisions on project issues.
3. Collect and share information on ROI methods.
4. Develop a standard ROI methodology for workforce development and training
programs that best satisfies the following criteria:
a. Manageable (easy to apply/administer; minimizes work and training for service
providers to implement)
b. Useful (relevant and timely; helps providers improve programs, helps
legislators and others understand program impacts)
c. Understandable (transparent; easily understood by experts, users, and the
general public – assumptions and limitations defined, rules of use defined)
d. Credible (trusted; measure is seen as accurate/credible by experts, users, and
the general public – relies on verified data as much as practical, process
Adopted: August 13, 2009, Last Updated: 9/14/09 1
Initiative Overview
integrity - ensures data and model integrity of applications),
e. Adaptable (measure can be used by different programs/providers)
f. Sensitive to change (collect and report data at a frequency that detects
significant variations)
5. Develop an action plan for each phase of the project:
Phase I: Evaluate existing ROI models and develop a standard model
Phases II - pilot test, evaluate, and refine the ROI measure
Phase III: Make policy and implementation recommendations as part of the
January 2011 GWDC Report to the Legislature. Include in the report:
i. Recommendations for communicating ROI results, including language
on the appropriate uses and limitations of ROI measures
ii. Recommendations for implementing a ROI workforce development and
training methodology statewide.
iii. Identify training and other implementation costs.
6. Team members feel that their perspectives were understood, that their involvement in
the project was a valuable use of their time, and that the process to achieve the
objectives was conducted efficiently and effectively.
Deliverable(s): 1) ROI methodology/template (assumptions, standard process, unique
application components/discussion), 2) Introductory page that provides background/context on
methodology (e.g., what the ROI methodology is, who the intended audience is for the measure,
value of the measure, how to apply the methodology)
8. Timeline (milestones and dates)
Phase I
Timeframe Activity
Jun-Aug 2009 Launch ROI Initiative, form committee, prepare project plan and action plan
Aug-Mar 2009 Review and evaluate ROI models
Jan–Apr 2010 Create standard ROI methodology
May-Jun 2010 Share recommended ROI methodology/approach with others
Gather feedback on methodology
Adjust methodology
Begin to plan Phases II & III
June 25, 2010 Adopt standard ROI methodology
9. Vision (what success will look like – what good results are we striving for?)
Our vision of success is pooling our shared knowledge and expertise to create through
consensus a return on investment methodology that is:
Useful (helps providers improve programs, helps legislators and others understand program
impacts),
Transparent (easily understood by experts, users, and the general public – assumptions and
limitations defined, rules of use defined),
Trusted (measure is seen as credible by experts, users, and the general public – relies on
―real‖ data as much as practical, process integrity - ensures data and model integrity of
applications),
Adaptable to different programs/providers, and
Easy to apply/administer (minimizes work and training for service providers to implement).
10. Performance Measures
Achieving ROI Initiative Objectives as defined above.
11. Committee Member Engagement Principles (Ground Rules) How we will conduct
Adopted: August 13, 2009, Last Updated: 9/14/09 2
Initiative Overview
ourselves and work with each other
1. Contribute your thinking and experience
2. Listen to understand
3. Connect and build on ideas
4. Set cell phones on silent, check messages during breaks
5. Communicate your comments, questions, or concerns
6. Stay on topic and on time
7. Fulfill Participant Roles and Responsibilities
13. Context Boundaries of the project
Time Participating in a 2 hour meeting every 4-6 weeks and up to three hours of
Commitment: work between meetings. Annual individual time commitment: (30-60 hours)
Participant Role And Responsibilities
Sponsors: Serve as the official leader, chair, or chief
Bryan Lindsley, operating officer for the project. Some specific
GWDC Executive responsibilities include:
Director 1. Determine the purpose, goal, scope of the
work, and participant roles and
responsibilities;
2. Designate project manager;
3. Fund meeting basics;
4. Invest the necessary time;
5. Provide sufficient resources (e.g., support
services);
6. Invite participants;
7. Provide needed background information and
direction
8. Define how decisions will be made
Project Manager: Manage the ROI Initiative so that it achieves its
Cristine Leavitt purpose and objectives. Some specific tasks
Member Roles include:
and 1. Conduct research and analysis
Responsibilities: 2. Work with sponsor and committee members
to develop and implement a project plan and
action plan
3. Prepare meeting materials (may include
agendas), and meeting summaries
4. Provide progress updates
Process Facilitator Coordinate meetings to assure fair, efficient,
Cheryl Kartes timely, and productive meetings. Some specific
(Cristine Leavitt for tasks include:
Kick-off mtg only) 1. Review project participants’ roles and
responsibilities
2. Design a fair and empowering process
3. Develop and enforce ground rules
4. Prepare meeting agendas and facilitation
materials.
5. Facilitate ―productive‖ meetings – adapt the
process to meet evolving needs and
changing circumstances (see list on p. 180 of
―Clues to Achieving Consensus‖ by Mira P.
Adopted: August 13, 2009, Last Updated: 9/14/09 3
Initiative Overview
Hanson)
6. Mediate conflicts
7. Remain neutral and objective, but at the
same time challenge the team to achieve
more
Committee Support: Sustain the lean transformation by ensuring
Shannon Scheurich implementation of the new standard of work
process and sustainability practices. Some
specific responsibilities include:
1. Set meeting dates and secure meeting
space
2. Coordinate food and beverage
3. Ensure that meeting materials are available
Committee Members: Contribute your expertise and talent to achieve
Paul Anton the ROI Initiative purpose and objectives. Some
Art Berman specific responsibilities include:
Mark Brinda 1. Share pertinent information, expertise, &
Carol Dombek opinions at meetings.
Martha Hegewisch 2. Serve as ambassador of ROI information.
Randy Johnson 3. Represent unique ―stakes‖ or perspectives of
Susan Lindoo partners, customers, stakeholders
Nick Maryns 4. Listen to understand
Anne Olson 5. Build upon the ideas of others
Brian Paulson 6. Develop Committee relationships
Raymond Robertson 7. Participate in consensus deliberations
Mary Rothchild 8. Promote collaborative solutions
Deb Serum 9. Respect collective and individual efforts
Todd Wagner 10. Complete Committee assignments (e.g.,
Luke Weisberg share and review ROI methodologies)
11. Participate in Committee events (e.g.,
meetings, conference calls, etc)
Stakeholders/ Review and comment on proposed ROI
Interested Parties methodology.
WDD program
directors, Mark C.
Larson (DOT)…
Assumptions: see ROI Project Overview
Strengths: Experience with ROI measures
Diversity of Representation
Private sector driving measure
Openness/willingness to share/ willing to move forward
Shared purpose
Some private sector experience
Have other experts to invite
Weaknesses: Private sector engagement on team
We represent ―insiders‖
Politics—can be ―written off‖
Team needs other perspectives for broader/more diverse view
Data assumptions (no perfect model, need more information)
Lack of data on self-served customers (i.e., Wagner Peyser customers
Adopted: August 13, 2009, Last Updated: 9/14/09 4
Initiative Overview
Benefits: Value to legislators; taxpayers
Enrich the policy conversation—clarify meaning/content
Information for philanthropic uses/help raise funds
Leverage additional resources
ROI as a way to compare value of programs
Explore different models and values and how to frame key points
Help us in the other work we do
Dangers/Threats: May motivate some to report false data - manipulate data
Go out and get feedback
Promoting conversations that still miss each other
Some programs won’t want to reveal their assumptions/won’t buy in
Political alienation to plan ahead
Getting real data on public assistance costs to lower assumptions
Invite legislative analyst to participate in ROI project
14. Communication Requirements
- Initiative launch message/invitation – Bryan Lindsley
- Project Plan and Action Plan – Committee/Cristine Leavitt
- Meeting agendas and summaries – Cristine and Cheryl Kartes
Adopted: August 13, 2009, Last Updated: 9/14/09 5
Related docs
Other docs by met18503
Get documents about "