a_survey_introduction

Document Sample
a_survey_introduction Powered By Docstoc
					SPA Budget Support Alignment Survey, Introduction                                                 1


Introduction
Background and objectives of the SPA’s budget support alignment
exercise

This report presents the main findings of the SPA Budget Support Working Group
(BSWG)1 monitoring exercise, which took place August-November 2003. The aim
of this exercise was to obtain information on progress made by budget support
donors in aligning and harmonising their activities in a number of PRSP countries
in Africa. The results obtained from this exercise represent the most
comprehensive data currently available on the progress of budget support
alignment with the PRS.

The exercise builds on the work of the SPA missions to Ethiopia, Rwanda and
Senegal in 2002. The missions concluded that the implementation of Poverty
Reduction Strategies (PRSs) would be strengthened if closer links could be
forged between national policy-making processes, budget cycles and reviews of
sectors and the PRS. Donors were recommended to align and harmonise their
activities behind national processes, in particular to strengthen links to the annual
PRS progress reviews and to budget cycles. The core message to donors was to
step back and allow national processes and systems to work.2

The new approach requires that donors be aware of the potential damage caused
by multiple donor demands (for example conditionalities, reviews, missions and
reporting requirements parallel to national systems for reporting and policy
making). The joint IMF-World Bank Concept Note entitled ‘Aligning Donor Budget
Support with the PRSP Process’ captures the core messages of the SPA
missions and goes beyond them by spelling out many of the operational
implications.

In order to take forward this agenda, the BSWG proposed to undertake a survey
of progress in alignment of budget support using a questionnaire (in three parts).
The survey was intended to collect useful information. However, it was also
hoped that the exercise would help partners to contribute more effectively to
implementing country-owned PRSs in countries in Africa.

That is, the purpose of the survey was to go beyond conventional information-
collection exercises. By the process of administering the questionnaires, the
intention was to: (1) stimulate dialogue between donors and governments on the
1
    The Strategic Partnership with Africa (SPA) is the forum of multilateral and bilateral
    development agencies on assistance to low-income Africa. The day to day work of the SPA is
    undertaken by a number of working groups of which the Budget Support Working Group
    (BSWG) is one. According to its work plan, the BSWG is focusing on PRS alignment issues
    arising from budget support provided by bilateral and multilateral donors. The BSWG’s main
    function is to catalyse change in specific countries: to help identify areas of misalignment; to
    suggest ways of overcoming these; and to support local initiatives. In drafting this report, the
    BSWG Co-Chairs have been assisted by David Booth and Nicola Pratt under a technical
    support contract between UK DFID and the Overseas Development Institute, London.
2
    SPA Missions to Ethiopia, Rwanda and Senegal, ‘Harmonisation of Support for Poverty
    Reduction Strategies: Synthesis Report’, 2002.
SPA Budget Support Alignment Survey, Introduction                                2


PRS-alignment issue; (2) report on the main findings of this exercise to all
respondents, SPA and OECD-DAC, in particular identifying good and bad
practices; (3) identify countries where close follow-up and support by SPA would
prove useful; and (4) lay the basis for monitoring progress annually.

The countries listed below were selected to conduct the SPA monitoring exercise.
These countries were selected because they have started a PRS process and
are current (or prospective) beneficiaries of budget, and/or balance-of-payments,
support. The Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) followed up with
government representatives to ensure the fullest possible participation. The
countries that actually responded are also listed below

 Countries selected to participate in the monitoring exercise
 Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, The Gambia, Ghana, Ethiopia, Guinea,
 Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania,
 Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda,
 Zambia

 Countries that responded to the monitoring exercise
 Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad, Ethiopia (Part 1 and Part 3 only), The Gambia,
 Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali (partially), Mozambique, Niger,
 Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia


The questionnaire

The questionnaire (reproduced in Annex 1) was in three parts.

   ■ Part One was completed jointly by government and representatives of
     all budget support donors. It aimed to obtain an overview of the PRS
     process to date. Answers were discussed during a meeting between
     government and donor representatives. As a result, almost all countries
     returned an agreed joint answer for Part One.

   ■ Part Two was completed by each budget support donor. The aim of
     Part Two was to focus on the alignment of budget (and balance of
     payments) support with national PRS and budget processes.

   ■ Part Three was completed by government representatives. The aim of
     Part Three was to obtain a view from government officials of their
     perception of how donors are aligning with national PRS processes.
     Questions were asked with regard to alignment and coordination of donors
     in reviews, missions, reporting requirements and selection of
     conditionalities, amongst other issues. Governments were asked to rate
     donors’ performance on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The purpose
     was not to embarrass donors but to identify further opportunities and
     constraints to alignment.

In each country, a lead donor was identified with responsibility for organising the
completion and return of the questionnaires. Their hard work was essential in
SPA Budget Support Alignment Survey, Introduction                                   3


ensuring the relatively high rate of return for this exercise. The role of lead donors
was to:

   ■ convene a meeting of representatives from government and budget
     support donors;
   ■ support donors in completing the questionnaires;
   ■ ensure government gets an adequate opportunity to comment on
     alignment and harmonisation;
   ■ attempt to form a consensus on key issues outlined in the questionnaire.

The process

     ■ Initial findings of this exercise were presented to the OECD DAC working
       party on aid effectiveness meeting at the end of October 2003 and to the
       PRSP-LG (Learning Group) meeting on 5 December 2003.

     ■ The final report is due to be presented at the SPA Plenary in the third
       week of January 2004.

Report structure and findings

The report has four sections. The first three sections outline the findings
corresponding to the three Parts of the questionnaire. The fourth presents
general conclusions, including some thoughts on the lessons for future efforts to
benchmark progress in alignment of budget support. The annexes include further
details on the donor responses, as well as the text of the questionnaire and the
explanatory note that accompanied it.

The main conclusion of this report is inevitably that there is still some work to do
in improving alignment of budget support programmes with PRSPs and national
systems. The challenge includes donors doing more to align their procedures and
requirements with the PRS; donors working harder at harmonising and
coordinating their procedures and requirements with one another; and
governments improving national systems and procedures related to the PRS,
particularly the rigour and effectiveness of PRS monitoring and review.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:5
posted:7/20/2011
language:English
pages:3