Docstoc

details

Document Sample
details Powered By Docstoc
					GUEST COLUMN / CULTURE

KEEPING LANGUAGES ALIVE
The world's diverse languages should be spoken, celebrated, and preserved,
writes SHELDON SHAEFFER

Bangkok Post
18/11/2007

Not a week passes without the report of a species - ranging from Bornean orangutans to Australian
spiders - being threatened, endangered, or newly extinct. Large amounts of resources, both human and
financial, and considerable passion, of both environmentalists and developers, are expended in the
fight over whether to save the species or let it die. The preservation of biodiversity, seen as essential
for a sustainable future, has become a major battleground of this century.

If only so much passion were devoted to another kind of diversity - that of languages and cultures! For
languages - and the cultures they transmit - are in serious trouble. Ninety-seven percent of the world's
people speak only 4% of the world's languages, which means that only 3% of the world's people speak
96% of its languages.

In 1992, the linguist Michael Krauss predicted that, if nothing were done, 90 percent of the world's
6,000 or so living languages (1/3 of which are in Asia) would become extinct over the next hundred
years. Fifty percent of these he classified as "moribund" (where the language is not being taught to or
learned by children of the language group) and another 40% as "endangered" (where the conditions
exist that, if not changed, will result in the language not being passed on to the next generation). Thus,
only 10% of the world's total languages can be reasonably classified as "safe" - in other words,
languages which have very large numbers of speakers and official state support. Linguistic and
cultural diversity is under serious threat around the world.

"If nothing is done" is the key phrase here. If nothing is done, these languages and their cultures will
die; the result will be an unprecedented loss of linguistic and cultural diversity over the course of this
century. But what actually is lost - not only to scholars but also to the world as a whole? Since every
language has within it a unique world view and culture, when it dies, we lose something which can
never be replaced - among other things, of course, traditional knowledge, history and wisdom.

The world's small ethnic minority language communities represent a relatively large percentage of the
worlds illiterate population. Why? In part, because ethnic minorities are frequently marginalised from
the mainstream of their nation's social, economic and political life and institutions. They are allowed
into that mainstream life - if at all - only by leaving behind their own ethnic and linguistic identity and
taking on the language and culture of the dominant society. This is not a new process. It is the long,
well-known, well-documented, and sad history of minority communities throughout the world.

This history is happening now in Thailand and elsewhere in Southeast Asia. Linguists estimate that
over 70 languages (not dialects, by most definitions) are spoken in Thailand (with hundreds more in
the other nations of ASEAN), and that perhaps up to 50% of children in Thailand do not speak
standard Thai as a mother tongue at home. But few recognise these facts and fewer still are willing to
see such diversity as a source of richness rather than of confusion, as an opportunity rather than a
problem. And very few understand that official recognition of, and support to, minority languages
(rather than their neglect and even suppression) can help to raise the prestige of the government among
minority communities and thus enhance (rather than subvert) their loyalty to the nation.

But to ensure that language remains the "strength" of ethnic minorities, their languages must often be
further developed or revitalised to save them from extinction. Another noted linguist, Eric Crystal,
suggests several steps to be taken to protect languages from extinction For example, an endangered
language will develop if its speakers can increase their prestige within the dominant community,
increase their wealth relative to the dominant community, and increase their legitimate power in the
eyes of the dominant community. Even more important, perhaps, are the ability of the speakers of the
language to be able to write their language down and a strong presence of the language in the
education system. In other words, it is essential to ensure that the only schooling experience of
children who speak a minority language is not in a language they do not speak and often cannot
understand.

Education systems therefore play a critical role in whether languages become extinct - or are able to
survive and thrive. Because the education systems of nation-states reflect the values and aspirations of
the dominant society, the ethnic minority children encounter a major barrier to their participation in
the life of the nation when they arrive at the door of their school. Most formal education systems, in
fact, are inappropriate for, or even hostile to, indigenous groups and their languages. This is especially
true in relation to the use of such languages in school. In many countries of the world, in fact, mother
tongues are forbidden to be spoken in the classroom.

It is therefore critical, both for cultural and linguistic development and for academic achievement
(including mastery of the national language and of international language) that early education and
initial literacy - even for adults - be conducted in the learners first language or mother tongue. There
are many reasons for this. Among others, the science of learning asserts that it is necessary to begin
school from where the learners are; the starting point of learning how to read and write is the language
spoken and understood by the learner - in other words, begin with the known and move to the
unknown. More practically speaking, it is impossible to teach the majority of children how to read and
write in a language they do not understand.

The results of research overwhelmingly support bilingualism or multilingualism. A recent study by the
International Institute for Educational Planning of UNESCO in Paris showed that a strategy of
bilingualism produces better learning outcomes and higher rates of internal efficiency in schools; that
using the language understood by learners as the medium of instruction not only builds trust, initiative,
and participation in the learning process but also promotes participatory teaching method; that
encouraging the use of an (ethnic) language as the medium of instruction stimulates the production of
school and cultural materials in that language, broadens the body of knowledge to be learned to
include local knowledge, and facilitates learners integration into national social and cultural life; and,
most importantly, that education in local languages can contribute very much at the political level to
improving relations between national political leaders and the base of the! societys multilingual
population.

Papua New Guinea, not a rich country by any means, is particularly famous for both its biodiversity,
with exotic new species found every year, and its cultural and linguistic diversity, with over eight
hundred languages spoken both, no doubt, because of its unique geography of isolated mountain
valleys and small islands. Yet Papua New Guinea is able to provide initial literacy in the first three
years of primary education in over 400 languages. More and more countries in the Asia and Pacific
region are making a similar effort, in far less challenging contexts. The net result, I would argue, will
be greater mastery of both mother tongues and, eventually, national and international languages and
revitalised ethnic minorities communities, more able to play their appropriate role in supporting and
enriching the nation as a whole.

Sheldon Shaeffer is the Director of UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education

				
DOCUMENT INFO