Fat Studies: Mapping the Field Abstract An extensive body of literature concerning obesity already exists, but this paper seeks to map the field of an emerging body of work that is critical of that dominant discourse. Although it has been most recently mobilised by the rhetoric of an assumed global obesity epidemic, or moral panic around fatness, Fat Studies has an extensive history and interdisciplinary literature which questions and problematises traditional understandings of obesity and draws upon the language, culture and theory of civil rights, social justice and social change. Fat Studies enables the reframing of the problem of obesity, where it is not the fat body that is at issue, but the cultural production of fatphobia. Given the powerful commercial, ideological and institutional interest in maintaining dominant obesity discourse, such reframing is contested. Nevertheless, this paper demonstrates that Fat Studies offers dynamic new possibilities for social scientists interested in using fat as an interrogative lens. Fat Studies: Mapping the Field This paper maps Fat Studies, an emerging interdisciplinary academic field, that is ripe for sociological exploration. Fat Studies is thrillingly complex, features multiple actors and perspectives, has potential for exciting theoretical and empirical research, combines popular and high academic discourse with social justice concerns, and is beginning to articulate an area of human life where there is a hunger, pun intended, for clarity and understanding. In this paper I consider some of the key themes and texts within Fat Studies as a means of introducing the field to those unfamiliar with it. My goal here is to show that there is much more to fat than the reductive miserlyness of dominant obesity discourse and contemporary obesity epidemic, and that work which considers fatness can be original, splendid and life-affirming. It is my aim that, as the paper progresses, readers will become aware of the richness within Fat Studies discourse, and be inspired to take on some of the work of expanding this field. So let us begin by acknowledging that there is already a vast literature available on obesity which defines fatness as a pathological medical, psychological and social phenomenon. Under the mantra of treatment and prevention, fatness is a problem that requires a solution, that is, the physical reduction of the fat body, and the elimination of the potential for individuals to become fat. Some of the writers mentioned below support that idea of fatness as pathology, yet critique various aspects – for example policy, medical evidence – which position it thus. Others regard the fixing of fat bodies as a dangerous and irrelevant goal, they argue that fatness is part of human experience and should be explored without the overriding judgement that it should be eliminated. An activist view would be that fat bodies have social value. Therefore, Fat Studies is different to dominant obesity discourse in that it is critical; it seeks to expand the understanding of fatness beyond the narrow confines of medicalisation or pathology; it often incorporates a social model which shifts the focus of interrogation away from the fat body itself and more towards positioning and contingent systems and structures; and it provides a platform for identifying, building and developing fat culture as well as extending alliances between activism and the academy. I have personal, political, professional and scholarly involvements with fat. As such, its boundaries and intersections are informed by my two decades of fat activism within a social movement that is called size acceptance, fat acceptance, fat liberation, fat politics, and by other names; it is also influenced by my personal history as a fat queer and through my budding identity as a scholar. As an activist, for example, I see that critical explorations of fatness as a social position and embodied identity have at least a 40-year history (Cooper 2009) but it is only within recent years that academics have taken a similarly probing view of dominant obesity discourse. Events such as the annual Popular Culture Association conference series in the US, which hosts a Fat Studies strand, or one-day seminars such as Fat Studies UK, which took place in York in 2008, have begun to shape the field and are supporting an accompanying literature (Tomrley and Kaloski Naylor 2009, Solovay and Rothblum 2009). However, as I shall demonstrate here, fat activism and its related critical literature already provides Fat Studies scholars with a considerable amount of material for examination, this body of work offers more than just a radical counterpoint to dominant obesity discourse, it can also be seen as a culture, one that is beginning to develop its own critical discourse. There are some limitations to this review. I have omitted material available within the health sciences in order to focus on published academic work within the social sciences. For reasons of space I have also ignored a lengthy examination of Health At Every Size, a developing critical paradigm for understanding fat and health. Similar reasons underpin my decision to exclude the network of zines, online message-boards and blogs, where a significant amount of Fat Studies commentary currently operates, or the numerous populist magazines supportive of fat activism that have come and gone over the years. I would like to add some notes on language. I use the term Fat Studies because of what I regard as its inherent critique of the medicalised concept obesity. As an activist I am interested in the use and reclamation of the word fat and I see Fat Studies as an umbrella for many perspectives, including critical theory. Fat Studies appears in the titles of two forthcoming readers and is the most common name for the field in the UK, US, Canada and Europe, where a majority of the scholarship is taking place. My PhD supervisor Dr Lee Monaghan actively resists the designantion Fat Studies and refers to his work as Critical Weight Studies (Monaghan 2008). I am aware that other writers who I would categorise as Fat Studies scholars define their work as Critical Obesity Studies, although it is unclear if this reflects a critical view of Fat Studies itself. This suggests a fragmentation or specialisation within the field, which could point to a schism between lay and professional perspectives, a reluctance to ally with fatness, a discomfort with the culturally-loaded word fat, a desire to coin new terms, or national differences. Whilst I note these differences a full discussion of them is beyond the scope of this paper. A further note on language: Sobal and Maurer (1999) open their collections with comments about social constructionism, and Murray (2008) repeatedly annotates fat and obese with inverted commas to emphasise their constructedness and contestability. I acknowledge the slippery and contextual nature of these categories, support the queer strategy of self-definition for working with subjective fat identities, and will assume that the reader is aware of such essentialist linguistic critiques. The Global Obesity Epidemic A critical obesity literature stretches back four decades but significant scholarly interest in developing this body of work is much more recent and has only begun to emerge within the last five years. The emergence of an assumed global obesity epidemic has necessitated such discourse. Where critical research into obesity had previously been the niche domain of activists and feminists, international government support of global obesity epidemic rhetoric led to much higher stakes in research, with considerable funding for anti-obesity projects, which provided an indirect platform for those who sought to analyse these developments. The fuzzy origins of what has come to be known as the global obesity epidemic can be found within a series of documents published in the late 1990s, for example, Moore et al (1997), Wilding (1997), and Popkin and Doak (1998) which were crystallised by the World Health Organization (1998) and, in the UK, Butland et al's Foresight report (2005), as well as in popular books such as Schlosser (2001). These works, and many others like them, warned of an obesity epidemic, an obesity timebomb, that would inevitably deplete worldwide health, create a massive financial burden of care, and affect children in particular. The treatment and prevention of obesity that operates within the rubric of this epidemiological literature has come under fierce attack by a number of critics through three key debates. Firstly, there is a call for a more measured approach to obesity science and a refuting of claims made about fat bodies within global obesity epidemiology, for example in Campos (2005), Gard and Wright (2005), Oliver (2006), Basham, Gori and Luik (2007), Campos et al (2006). Pieterman (2007) groups the first four books together in his short literature review of the social construction of fat, and they are very similar in the ways they examine the available medical literature on fat and health and debunk obesity science, by showing that it is a product of a social context in which fat hatred is endemic and profitable. The authors consider how the obesity epidemic fuels wider political concerns and supports particular ideological perspectives and policies. Gard and Wright diverge with discussions about the influence of feminist discourses on slenderness and the body, for example Orbach (1978), Bartky (1990), and Bordo (1993), which are themselves part of a wider feminist discourse on beauty, patriarchy and the body, for example Chernin (1983) and Wolf (1990). Basham et al propose medical treatment for the "severely obese category" (p.40) as well as a healthy living agenda that veers close to traditional anti- obesity interventions and this illustrates a contradiction within some of these texts: whilst the authors are critical of the origins and effects of the global obesity epidemic, they maintain their investment in the treatment and prevention of obesity. Secondly, Oliver (2006) points out that the WHO report was drafted by the International Obesity Task Force, a pressure group consisting of health professionals who are financially supported and who act in the interests of various commercial weight loss organisations. This raises issues about the global obesity epidemic and consumerism. He makes the provocative assertion that the global obesity epidemic is a government-sanctioned marketing strategy for multinational weight loss corporations. One of the sub-strategies of this process is the incorporation of anti-fat moral discourse within anti-obesity health promotion. Thirdly, there is concern about how global obesity epidemic rhetoric supports a moral discourse around fatness. Herndon (2005) asserts that the metaphorical war on obesity proposed by supporters of the obesity epidemic paradigm projects anxieties about nationhood, race, class and economics onto individuals and is an example of a moral panic, described succinctly by Saguy and Almeling (2005) as 'fat panic'. Saguy and Almeling (2008) continue this theme and note how morality became a significant part of the popular discourse on obesity through the processing of the original reports by the global news media. Other authors have developed and situated their work within this critical discourse. Monaghan (2008) presents his ethnography of male dieters against the presumed epidemic; similarly, Stearns (2002) and Gilman (2008) write within a historical and cross-cultural reading of the phenomenon, Swee Kian Tay (2003) locates her critical reading of obesity in Singapore, and Murray (2007) exposes health professionals' value-laden critical gaze in interpreting obesity as pathological. Harjunen (2002) and Evans et al (2008) consider the theoretical groundings of the obesity epidemic and the effects of its practical application, via policy, on young people. Wright and Harwood (2008) extend this concern further across different countries under the theoretical concept of biopedagogy, relating to the increased surveillance, regulation and self-policing of young people's bodies through socio-medical 'knowledge'. Azzarito (2008) endorses this view and argues that fatness has become a curriculum project in American schools. The academic rigour supporting these studies is a recent development in the field, yet this approach could also be contested. Gard (2008) has criticised Campos for substituting 'bad science' with 'good science' without critiquing the use of science, and much of the discourse relies on an uncritically positivist stance regarding truth and facts. Moreover, the trend for professional and scholarly remoteness from the subject matter echoes the distance between the WHO report and Foresight, for example, and the fat subjects of their research. Although some of the authors above identify as fat, fat people themselves are abstracted and largely absent from the discourse which often also fails to engage with the broader historical Fat Studies literature and activism that I will come to later. An oppositional literature The works cited above locate themselves against a dominant obesity discourse which constructs fat in 21st century Western culture through a biomedical framework concerning categorisation, illness and pathology. Chang and Christakis (2002) reveal the subtle changes in fat medicalisation over the 20th century and provide excellent examples of this discourse. But the critical literature relating to the Global Obesity Epidemic is only a fraction of the available work that adopts a critical stance against dominant obesity discourse. There is a much older and broader literature that is often overlooked by critical fat panic arrivistes. The earliest works of this kind are located within activism, such as Louderback's manifesto (1970), and the subsequent research produced and published by The Fat Underground, now available in the Largesse Fat Liberation Archives (http://www.eskimo.com/~largesse/Archives/). But the better-known and more heavily-referenced works of this prior body of literature are those which share some of the characteristics of critical obesity epidemic research, namely positivism, science, treatment, rational modernity, and meaning. Bruch (1957) illustrates this approach well. Her research is very much of its time, it is racist and colonialist, she regards fatness as evidence of dysfunctional psychology, and calls for its treatment, yet she is dismissive of contemporary weight loss interventions. Bruch is hardly supportive of what later came to be known as fat liberation, her position is startlingly similar to today's anti-obesity proponents, but her critical and questioning tone is radical. Bruch's legacy can be seen in Ernsberger and Haskew (1987), and later Kolata (2007), who attempt to unpack obesity science, or Tenzer (1989), Polivy and Herman (1983) and Oliver-Pyatt (2004), who propose a non-diet approach to fat health. Alternative obesity treatment models are suggested by Brown and Rothblum (1990), who discuss the possibilities for anti-oppressive practice, and Irving (2000), who describes such a size acceptance/eating disorder prevention schools programme. A more recent synthesis of Bruch's clinical work and size acceptance can be found in Health At Every Size, a non-diet paradigm for fat and health supported by health professionals including Bacon (2008), for example, and Gingras (2009). Bruch's questionable categorisation of fatness as an eating disorder underpins later feminist theory concerning slenderness and the meaning of fatness to normative-sized people, such as such as Chernin (1983), Seid (1989) and Mason- John (1996). Within rigorous, scholarly, 'objective' accounts of fat, which take a critical and oppositional view of mainstream obesity discourse, there is a body of work concerned with stigma and discrimination. This is not surprising given Goffman's (1963) sociologically influential work in the field, and also, I would argue, the desire of critical researchers to engage with and promote social justice. Goodman (1995) considers fat prejudice as part of "a wider caste system" (p.17), compares its dynamics and features, such as dehumanisation, to anti-semitism, and demonstrates the systemic nature of discrimination. Myers and Rothblum (2005) address structural anti-fat attitudes within psychology, and present the relationship between stigma, discrimination and psychological distress, and Solovay (2000) explores the legal frameworks and opportunities for fighting discrimination. Within the positivist traditions, Allison et al (1991) and Lewis et al (1997) attempt to develop measurement tools for anti-fat attitudes; Hague and White (2005) present systems for addressing anti-fat attitudes amongst teachers; Crosnoe, Frank and Strassman (2008) examine the gendered effects of body size in social networks; and Swami et al (2008) show that high levels of stigma correlate with higher BMI. Brownell et al's (2005) collection on weight bias highlights the problematic nature of 'impartial' scholarly detachment in Fat Studies. Some of its authors are affiliated with the Rudd Center at Yale University which is both critical of weight bias yet supportive of weight loss and unwilling to adopt HAES, a position seen by some fat activists as paradoxical (Robison 2007). Concern for social justice and recognition of the effects of fatphobia and discrimination lead towards the point where distinctions start to become apparent between researchers who are somewhat removed from the day-to-day experience of being fat and those who have a closer relationship to it. Although fat people are the subjects of the research I have described so far, they are often abstract presences within it, a nebulous blob of people sometimes known as 'the obese', which echoes contested approaches to fat people within more traditional medicalised obesity discourses. Goodman (1995) describes obesity science's reduction of fat embodiment as "a collection of measurements and body parts" (p.16), which could be a criticism not only of dominant obesity discourse but also of its critics. Not surprisingly, an equally abundant literature that takes an oppositional stance to dominant obesity discourses concerns fat subjectivity and embodiment, that is, how fatness is experienced, and these works tend to have been produced by those with first-hand experience of the phenomenon, for example Jenkins and Farnham (1988), both of whom were involved with the London Fat Women's Group of the late 1980s. To Braziel and LeBesco (2001), and Shaw (2006), fat identity is transgressive, it makes a mockery of cultural norms, which is why it is socially reviled. Yet other accounts reveal a more complicated contingent social construction of how we as fat people see ourselves. Millman's accounts and photographs (1980), for example, explore vulnerability and ambivalence, as does Schmidt's (1985) account of becoming disabled as a result of weight loss surgery, Murray's (2005) struggles in identifying with fat politics, or the internalised oppression described by Calogero, Herbozo and Thompson (2009); that is, fat experience as bound up in issues of survivorhood and ambiguous or negative self-image. Some social science scholars have incorporated these accounts into their research through theory, for example Harjunen's exploration of fat as a liminal state (2003); Colls' study of fat materialisation (2007); fat as an embodiment of working class rhetoric in LeBesco (2007); or Levy-Navarro's (2008) use of early modern literature to deconstruct the late-modern concept of obesity. Intersectionality is addressed by The Fireweed Collective (1999) and Monaghan (2005) with accounts of third wave feminism and masculinity respectively. A quartet of qualitative studies, Goode and Preissler's (1983) exploration of fat admirers as deviant; Gimlin's (2002) encounters with NAAFA (National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance); Swami and Tovee's (2009) research into fat admirers' perception of body size; and Scott-Dixon's (2008) ethnography of fat women in sport, suggest that fat subjectivity is a phenomenon that can illuminate the embodiment of people of all sizes. Another body of literature that spans scholarly and popular work around subjectivity concerns how behaviours associated with fatness are experienced, namely weight loss. The accounts of Cannon and Einzig (1985), Ogden (1992) and Evans Young (1995) are not necessarily critical of dominant obesity discourse, yet their problematising of diet and the body is relevant to fat subjectivity and therefore to critical discourse within fat studies. Throsby (2007, 2008) is also concerned with fat people's experience of weight loss, though she interrogates bariatric surgery; its conceptualisation as a re-birth, and the personal accounts drawn upon by fat people which avoid self-blame within the wider obesity-morality discourse. But weight loss is not the only behaviour associated with fat subjectivity, Colls (2006), for example, charts the emotional experiences of fat women shopping for clothes. Fat subjectivity forms the basis of a rich profusion of popular works, which deserve a literature review of their own. These books include memoirs by celebrities (Manheim 2000, Mo'Nique and McGee 2004, French 2008) and mortals (Bovey 2000, Klein 2008); size acceptance children's books (Jasper 1988, Newman 1991); self-help size acceptance books (Schroeder 1992, Erdman 1996, Thone 1997, Bernell and Renee 2000, Gaesser 2002, Frater 2005); fashion, crafting and project work as a means of self-expression and self-care (Soudan and French 1990, Nanfeldt 1996, Deckert 2002) and non-diet health, fitness and wellness guides for fat people (Roberts 1985, Lewis 1986, Lyons and Burgard 1990, Jonas 1997, Blank 2000, van der Ziel and Tourville 2002, Shanker 2005, Harding and Kirby 2009). Popular works about fat subjectivity segue fairly seamlessly into the literature of fat activism in writings by Schoenfielder and Wieser (1983), Jenkins and Smith (1987), Lamm (1995), Bovey (1989), Cooper (1998) and Wann (1998) who combine personal testimony with a critique of oppressive social structures. Empirical studies consider fat people's relationships to activism (Tischner and Malson 2008); use activism as a model through which to explore people's attitudes to activism (Sturmer et al 2003); and have found improved well-being amongst fat women who adopted fat activism (McKinley 2004). Finally, within the body of literature that seeks to provide an alternative set of values to dominant obesity discourses, there are a number of celebratory and appreciative works around fat, ranging from Klein's (1996) meandering and pretentious love-letter to fat; photographic collections of fat nudes (Edison and Notkin 1994, Nimoy 2007); poetry (Nichols 1984, Donald 1986, Stinson 1993, Zellman et al 2009); novels (Stinson 1994, 1996, 2004; Koppelman 2003); and fiction anthologies (Blank 2001, Jarrell and Sukrungruang 2003, 2005). Reframing the problem Oppositional literature which seeks to explore the very nature of fat subjectivity could be regarded as being part of a discourse that is trying to reframe the problem of obesity. Instead of thinking about fatness within a biomedical model, or as intrinsically tied to an energy balance paradigm where fat is always assumed to be the result of a dysfunctional bodily relationship between the number of calories consumed and the number of calories expended, it proposes that there are multiple ways of looking at the issue or, indeed, that there are multiple issues. This discourse includes works such as Neumark-Sztainer (1997), whose philosophical reflections on obesity are medicalised, yet make a case for using a variety of perspectives in conceptualising fatness. Dalton (1998), a dietician, calls for a similar multidisciplinary approach to weight management that considers size acceptance a valid intervention. Both authors persist in locating 'the problem' within fat embodiment, and therefore assume that 'the solution' lies in treating and preventing fat bodies. But Cooper (1997) and Herndon (2002) suggest a different approach by introducing theoretical possibilities for reframing the discourse away from the body by considering the ways that structural power is enacted upon fat people, and invoking the Social Model of Disability as a potential theoretical basis for reconsidering fat activism and fat subjectivity. Sobal and Maurer's (1999a,b) complimentary volumes also propose activism as a possible means of reframing meanings associated with obesity, which LeBesco (2004) consolidates in her study, and Johnston and Taylor (2008) develop in their research. The latter two works demonstrate the limitations of traditional obesity discourse, and the expansive possibilities that activism offers in challenging abjected fat identity and promoting a profound paradigm shift. Kirkland (2008) considers a central feature of this paradigm shift, that of the demand for rights by fat activists, and the promotion of a discourse that considers legal frameworks, discrimination, and the potential for redress and social justice. It would be a mistake to think that reframing fatness would be a process devoid of tension. Saguy and Riley (2005) and Kwan (2009) present it as being hostile and politically motivated, a contest for supremacy between government, activists and industry. This power struggle is not surprising given the commercial interests involved in maintaining the status quo. But there is tension within organisations too, Martin's (2002) study explores how Weight Watchers, Overeaters Anonymous and NAAFA attempt to construct alignment and loyalty with organisational values, and frames of meanings within their membership, and the ways that users comply with and resist those processes. Backlash One of the stresses that comes from reframing fatness involves a jostling for primacy between the various players within the newly expanded field, and perhaps an avoidance of moral relativism. Dominant obesity discourse is comparatively monolithic compared to this new landscape, which now demands answers to the question of where one allies oneself. Though traditional obesity discourses are undoubtedly problematic, alternative accounts are also attracting criticism and even backlash. A handful of writers are deeply uncomfortable with the notion of fat liberation, or even fat acceptance. Fumento (1997) is critical of traditional obesity science, yet he is similarly disdainful of fat liberation and supplies a number of weight loss strategies in his book. Critser (2003) critiques the American food industry and is supportive of self-acceptance, yet he stresses that self-accepting fat people are deluded and weight loss is the key to good health. Grossman (2003) articulates a popular view by asserting that fat activism is insupportable because it undermines the possibility of individuals, and society in general, being able to overcome their obesity, although this position neglects the possible personal and social benefits that such activism can bring, improved self-esteem or community-building, for example, or the health benefits of giving up dieting. Clearly these writers share a perspective that problematises fatness in the first place, unlike Bovey (1994, 2002), Murray (2005) and Glen (2008), who write from positions within the size acceptance movement. Whilst Bovey names a handful of fat women she admires for their fat embodiment, she is also alienated by and critical of a fat liberation movement that she feels is dictatorial, and advocates for other women who feel similarly. Personally unable to accept her own fatness, and sceptical of other fat women's ability to feel self-accepting of their bodies, Bovey changed the title of her book to reflect this position, lost weight in secret at a diet club and published a feminist weight loss book. Murray is equally critical of what she feels is an inherent narrative within fat liberation, that one comes out as fat and that there is no ambiguity or discomfort in the way that one might experience one's fatness. This contradicts her subjective reality that includes episodes of pride, disgust and shame. In a later work (2008) she critiques individualistic ideology within some parts of the fat acceptance movement and argues that people cannot choose their own realities, that everybody is implicated within social systems and that these impact upon the ways one experiences fat embodiment. Mack (2007) endorses this view in a critique of the coming out discourse that is popular within fat liberation. Glen is also dismissive of the fat liberation movement, which she argues is hostile to those who suffer eating disorders. Probyn's (2008) criticisms of the size acceptance movement, which have been widely accepted within some areas of the academy, are reserved for what she considers its theoretical underpinnings. She is aghast by what she considers limited readings of Foucault, although she does not reference Evans et al (2008) or Wright and Harwood (2008), who both provide in-depth Foucauldian analysis of fatness. Probyn attacks poor media literacy within fat liberation, but fails to address such phenomena as fat zine-making, or the Fatosphere (a network of fat bloggers), or the complex ways in which fat activists have been using and creating media for the past 40 years. By stating that feminists are not engaging with fatness, Probyn echoes Wooley and Wooley's (1979) influential argument that fat is a neglected feminist topic, and Smith's (1989) call to radical feminists to create a politics of appearance. But Probyn's own analysis is extremely limited, she seems unaware of the body of work I have outlined in this paper and has based her arguments on Orbach's (1978) highly contested understanding of fatness (Cooper 1998, Murray 2008, Tomrley 2009). Her critique is located within discourses around food poverty, energy balance, and she blames capitalism, agribusiness and "cheap and bad products" (p.402) for the preponderance of obesity. Not only does she reinforce the feminist academy's historical inability to develop a strong and rigorous understanding of fat, she merely reiterates the claims made by obesity epidemic proponents using energy balance paradigms such as Foresight (Butland et al 2005). New complexities Although flawed, Probyn's account demonstrates the complexity of viewpoints and critiques that are likely to surface as new literature emerges and Fat Studies matures; her discussion cannot be reduced to positions of pro- or anti-. Walkerdine (2008) cites Gard (2008) as a further example of this complexity, stating that his work has been adopted by the libertarian right as well as leftist activists but is ignored within mainstream obesity discourses. She proposes that Arendt's (1999) web of relations as a more fruitful model for illuminating the intricacies of the discourses and goes on to say: […] traditional modes of opposition and critique, often directed at a government, for example, simply do not even vaguely match the complexity of the current political situation. […] there is no longer a simple politics of opposition, but complex oppositional politics with intersecting claims, demands and interests. (Walkerdine 2008, p.199) This complexity is apparent within a handful of forthcoming books (Tomrley and Kalosky 2009, Solovay and Rothblum 2009, Monaghan, Aphramor and Rich 2009) which are more explicitly situated within Fat Studies than the earlier works mentioned in this review. Rothblum and Solovay divide their weighty Fat Studies Reader into subsections that address intersectionality, international perspectives, literature, history, popular culture, legal theory and civil rights, economics and political theory, education, science and public health, and fat activism. The Pop Culture Association's annual conference, which includes a strand that has been instrumental in developing Fat Studies, brings further additions: panels on Encountering and Coping with Anti-Fat Bias, fat embodiment and an examination of visual representations of fatness. These works guard against moral relativism by acknowledging the body of critical literature, maintaining their own critical perspective, and upholding a commitment to wider social justice issues. Obviously, as an emerging location for scholarly investigation, there are substantial gaps in the literature, for example: although intersectionality is an interest, there are few critical cross-cultural studies; a lack of empirical studies for HAES; little scholarship that reflects abundance of popular literature, and vice versa; virtually no theoretical or historical explanations for fat activism; and a distressing polarisation between those who wish to preserve dominant obesity discourses and those who wish to dismantle them. This literature review has shown that the works within Fat Studies cannot be written off as a recent phenomenon on a single-issue. Although the Fat Studies literature is dominated by such works, it is more than merely a critique of current obesity epidemic politicking, as contributions by cultural historians and anthropologists Schwarz (1986) and Kulick and Meneley (2005) demonstrate. I have also argued that although the body of work has roots within an oppositional literature, and that its critical nature is important, it is moving beyond that remit, as it must, to address new complexities, for example in Longhurst (2005) attempts to develop research agendas within geography that consider fatness; Guthman and DuPuis (2006), who critique obesity epidemic rhetoric from an energy balance model of fat, itself highly contested within Fat Studies; Ross and Moorti's (2005) collection of Feminist Media Studies articles on fat; or Giusti's (2009) anthology that addresses fatness and queer theory. Given the commercial and governmental pressures to treat and prevent obesity within the alleged global obesity epidemic, it is likely that Fat Studies may become co-opted by supporters of dominant obesity discourse, but I hope that Fat Studies can morph into a canon that considers the value of fat diversity, fat culture, that can address new complexities, and create possibilities for recognising fat as a perspective, a new kind of interdisciplinary lens. Acknowledgements Thanks to Dr Lee Monaghan at the University of Limerick for his support of this paper. Reference List Allison, D., Basile V., Yuker, H. (1991) 'The Measurement Of Attitudes Toward And Beliefs About Obese Persons' International Journal Of Eating Disorders 10:5, 599- 607. Arendt, H. (1999) The Human Condition, (2nd ed), Chicago University Press. Azzarito, L. (2008) '"Shape up America!" Understanding Fatness as a Curriculum Project' Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 3. Bacon, L. (2008) Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth about Your Weight, Dallas: Benbella Books. Bartky, S. (1990) Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression, New York: Routledge. Basham, P., Gori, G.B. and Luik, J. (2007) Diet Nation: Exposing the Obesity Crusade, London: Social Affairs Unit. Bernell, B. and Renee, C. (2000) Bountiful Women: Large Women's Secrets for Living the Life They Desire, Tulsa: Council Oak Books. Blank, H. (2000) Big Big Love: A Sourcebook on Sex for People of Size and Those Who Love Them, Oakland, CA: Greenery Press. –– (2001) Zaftig: well rounded erotica, San Francisco: Cleis Press. Bordo, S. (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and The Body, Berkeley: University of California Press. Bovey, S. (1989) Being Fat Is Not A Sin, London: Pandora. –– (1994) The Forbidden Body, London: Pandora –– (2000) Sizeable Reflections: Big Women Living Full Lives, London: the Women's Press. –– (2002) What Have You Got to Lose? The Great Weight Debate and How to Diet Successfully, London: The Women's Press. Braziel, J.E. and LeBesco, K. (2001) Bodies Out of Bounds: Fatness and Transgression, Berkeley: University of California Press. Brown, L. and Rothblum, E. (1990) Fat Oppression and Psychotherapy, New York: The Haworth Press. Brownell, K.D., Rudd, L, Schwartz, M.B. and Puhl, R.M. (2005) Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, and Remedies, New York: Guildford Press. Bruch, H. (1957) The Importance of Overweight, New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc. Butland, B., Jebb, S., Kopelman, P., McPherson, K., Thomas, S., Mardell, J. and Parry, V. (2005) Foresight Tackling Obesities: Future Choices – Project Report, Government Office for Science, Great Britain. Calogero, R.M., Herbozo, S., Thompson, J.K. (2009) 'Complimentary Weightism: The Potential Costs Of Appearance-Related Commentary For Women's Self- Objectification,' Psychology Of Women Quarterly, 33:1, 120-132. Campos, P. (2005) The Diet Myth: Why America's Obsession With Weight Is Hazardous To Your Health, New York: Penguin. Campos, P., Saguy, A., Ernsberger, P., Oliver, E and Gaesser, G. (2006) 'The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic?' International Journal of Epidemiology 35:1, 55-60. Cannon, G. and Einzig, H. (1985) Dieting Makes You Fat, New York: Simon & Schuster. Chang, V. and Christakis, N. (2002) 'Medical Modelling of Obesity: A Transition from Action to Experience in a 20th Century American Textbook,' Sociology of Health and Illness, 24:20, 151-177. Chernin (1983) Womansize, London: The Women's Press. Colls, R. (2006) 'Outsize/Outside: Bodily bignesses and the emotional experiences of British women shopping for clothes,' Gender, Place and Culture - A Journal of Feminist Geography, 13: 5, 529-545. –– (2007) 'Materialising bodily matter: Intra-action and the embodiment of "Fat"', Geoforum, 38:2, 353-365. Cooper, C. (1997) 'Can a Fat Woman Call Herself Disabled?' Disability & Society, 12:1 31-41. –– (1998) Fat & Proud: The Politics of Size, London: The Women's Press. –– (2009) 'Fat Activism in Ten Astonishing, Beguiling, Inspiring and beautiful Episodes' in Tomrley, C. and Kaloski Naylor, A. eds Fat Studies In The UK, York: Raw Nerve Books, 19-31. Critser, G. (2003) Fat Land: How Americans Became the Fattest People in the World, London: Allen Lane. Crosnoe, R., Frank, K., and Strassman, A. (2008), 'Gender, body size and social relations in American high schools,' Social Forces, 86:3, 1189-1216. Dalton, S. (1998) 'The dietitians' philosophy and practice in multidisciplinary weight management,' Journal Of The American Dietetic Association, 98:10, S49-S54. Deckert, B. (2002) Sewing for plus sizes: creating clothes that fit & flatter, Newtown, CT: Taunton Press. Donald, C.M. (1986) The fat woman measures up, Charlottetown, P.E.I: Ragweed. Edison, L. T. and Notkin, D. (1994) Women En Large, San Francisco, California: Books In Focus. Erdman, C. (1996) Nothing To Lose: A Guide to Sane Living in a Larger Body, New York: HarperOne. Ernsberger, P. and Haskew, P. (1987) 'Health Implications of Obesity: An Alternative View,' Journal of Obesity and Weight Regulation, 6:67, 58-137. Evans, J., Rich, E., Davies, B, Allwood, R. (2008) Education, Disordered Eating and Obesity Discourse: Fat Fabrications, Abingdon: Routledge. Evans Young, M. (1995) Diet breaking: Having It All Without Having To Diet, London: Hodder & Stoughton. Fireweed Collective (1999) The Fat Issue 67, Toronto: Fireweed. Foucault, M. (1980) 'Power and Strategies' in Power/Knowledge, Brighton: The Harvester Press, 134-145. Frater, L. (2005) Fat Chicks Rule! How to Survive in a Thin-centric World, New York: Ig Publishing. French, D. (2008) Dear Fatty, London: Century. Fumento, M. (1997) The Fat of The Land: Our Health Problem Crisis and How Overweight Americans Can Help Themselves, New York: Penguin. Gaesser, G. (2002) Big Fat Lies: The Truth About Your Weight and Your Health, Carlsbad CA: Gurze Books. Gard, M. (2008) 'Friends, Enemies and The Cultural Politics of Doing Critical Obesity Research' in Wright, J. and Harwood, V. (eds) Biopolitics and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies, London: Taylor & Francis, 31-44. Gard, M. and Wright, J. (2005) The Obesity Epidemic, London: Routledge. Gimlin, D. L. (2002) Body Work: Beauty and Self-Image in American Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press. Gilman, S. (2008) Fat: A Cultural History of Obesity, Cambridge: Polity Press. Gingras, J.R. (2009) Longing for Recognition: The joys, complexities, and contradictions of practicing dietetics, York: Raw Nerve. Giusti, J. (2009) Spilling Over: A Fat Queer Anthology, University of Minnesota Press. Glen, L.R. (2008) 'Big Trouble: are eating disorders the lavender menace of the fat acceptance movement?' Bitch Magazine: Feminist Response to Pop Culture, 38, 40- 45. Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Goode, E., and Preissler, J. (1983) 'The fat admirer,' Deviant Behavior, 4, 175-202. Goodman, W.C. (1995) The Invisible Woman: Confronting Weight Prejudice In America, Carlsbad CA: Gurze Books. Grossman, J. (2003) 'The Perils of "Fat Acceptance"', National Review, 55:22, 34-38. Guthman, J. and DuPuis, M. (2006) 'Embodying neoliberalism: economy, culture, and the politics of fat,' Society and Space, 24, 427-448. Hague, A.L. and White, A.A. (2005) 'Web-Based Intervention for Changing Attitudes of Obesity among Current and Future Teachers,' Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37:2, 58-66. Harding, K. and Kirby, M. (2009) Lessons from the Fat-o-sphere: Quit Dieting and Declare a Truce with Your Body, New York: Perigee Trade Harjunen, H. (2002) 'The Construction of an Acceptable Female Body in Finnish Schools' in Sunnari, V., Kangasvuo, J., Heikkinen, M. (eds) Gendered and Sexualised Violence in Educational Environments, Oulu University Press, 81-94. –– (2003) 'Obesity as a Liminal and Marginalised Experience', in Gender and Power in New Europe, the 5th European Feminist Research Conference, Lund University, Sweden, August 20-24, 2003, International Information Centre and Archives for the Women's Movement. Harvey, D. (2007) 'The Neoliberal State' in A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, 64-86. Herndon, A.M. (2002) 'Disparate But Disabled: Fat Embodiment and Disability Studies,' National Women's Studies Association Journal, 14:3, 120-13. –– (2005) 'Collateral Damage from Friendly Fire?: Race, Nation, Class and the" War Against Obesity"', Social Semiotics, 15:2, 127-141. Irving, L.M. (2000) 'Promoting size acceptance in elementary school children: The EDAP puppet program,' Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 8:3, 221-232. Jarrell, D. and Sukrungruang, I. (2003) What are you looking at? the first fat fiction anthology, New York: Harcourt. –– (2005) Scoot over, skinny: the fat nonfiction anthology, New York: Harcourt. Jasper, K. (1988) Are You Too Fat, Ginny? Toronto: Is Five Press. Jenkins, T. and Farnham, M. (1988) 'As I Am,' Trouble and Strife 13. Jenkins, T. and Smith H. (1987) 'Fat Liberation,' Spare Rib 182, 14-18. Johnston, J. and Taylor,J. (2008) 'Feminist Consumerism and Fat Activists: A Comparative Study of Grassroots Activism and the Dove Real Beauty Campaign,' Signs, 33:4, 941-966. Jonas, S. (1997) Just the Weigh You Are: How to be Fit and Healthy, Whatever Your Size, New York: Houghton Mifflin. Kirkland, A. (2008) Fat Rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood, New York University Press. Klein, R. (1996) Eat Fat, New York: Pantheon Books. Klein, S. (2008) Moose: A Memoir of Fat Camp, New York: William Morrow. Kolata, G. (2007) Rethinking Thin, New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. Koppelman, S. (2003) The strange history of Suzanne LaFleshe and other stories of women and fatness, New York: Feminist Press. Kulick, D. and Meneley, A. (2005) Fat: The Anthropology of an Obsession, New York: Penguin. Kwan, S. (2009) 'Framing the Fat Body: Contested Meanings between Government, Activists, and Industry,' Sociological Enquiry, 79:1, 25-50. Lamm, N. (1995) 'It's a Big Fat Revolution' in Findlen, B. (ed) Listen Up: Voices from the Next Feminist Generation, Seattle: Seal Press, 85-94. LeBesco, K. (2004) Revolting Bodies: The Struggle to Redefine Fat Identity, University of Massachusetts Press. –– (2007) Fatness as the Embodiment of Working-Class Rhetoric, in DeGenaro, W. (ed) Who Says? Working-class Rhetoric, Class Consciousness, and Community, University of Pittsburgh Press, 238-255. Levy-Navarro, E. (2008) The Culture of Obesity in Early and Late Modernity: Body Image in Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton, and Skelton, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Lewis, M. (1986) The Roly Poly Workout Book: Fit, Fat And Fruity, London: WH Allen. Lewis, R.J., Cash, T.F., Jacobi, L, Bubb, C. (1997) 'Prejudice toward fat people: The development and validation of the antifat attitudes test,' Obesity Research, 5:4, 297- 307. Longhurst, R. (2005) 'Fat bodies: developing geographical research agendas,' Progress In Human Geography, 29:3, 247-259. Louderback, L. (1970), Fat Power, New York: Hawthorne Books. Lyons, P. and Burgard, D. (1990) Great Shape, Palo Alto, CA: Bull Publishing Company. Mack, A.N. (2007) 'Closely Closeted: The Fat Acceptance Movement and Embodied Closets of Power,' paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association 93rd Annual Convention, Chicago, [online] available: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p193951_index.html [accessed 18 march 2009]. Manheim, C. (2000) Wake Up, I'm Fat! New York: Broadway Books. Martin, D.D. (2002) 'From appearance tales to oppression tales - Frame alignment and organizational identity,' Journal Of Contemporary Ethnography, 31:2, 158-206. Mason-John, V. (1996) 'Keeping Up Appearances: The Body and Eating Habits' in Godwin, N., Hollows, B. and Nye, S. (eds) Assaults on Convention: Essays on Lesbian Transgressors, London: Cassell, 64-81. McKinley, N.M. (2004) 'Resisting body dissatisfaction: Fat women who endorse fat acceptance,' Body Image, 1:2, 213-219. Millman. M. (1980) Such a Pretty Face: Being Fat in America, La Vergne TN: Lightning Source Inc. Monaghan, L.F. (2005) 'Big handsome men, bears and others: virtual constructions of "fat male embodiment"', Body & Society 11:2, 81-111. –– (2008) Men and The War On Obesity, Abingdon: Routledge. Monaghan, L.F., Aphramor, L., Rich, E. (2009) Expanding The Obesity Debate, London: Palgrave. Mo'Nique and McGee, S.A. (2004) Skinny women are evil: notes of a big girl in a small-minded world, New York: Atria Books. Moore, B.J., Koop, C.E. and Stern, J.S. (1997) The Obesity Epidemic: Nutrition Policy and Public Health Imperatives, in, Bronner, F. (ed) Nutrition Policy in Public Health, New York: Springer Publishing Co., 138-156. Murray, S. (2005) 'Doing Politics or Selling Out? Living the Fat Body' Women's Studies, 34:3-4, 265-277. –– (2007) 'Corporeal Knowledges and Deviant Bodies: Perceiving the Fat Body,' Social Semiotics, 17: 3, 361-373. –– (2008) The 'Fat' Female Body, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Myers, A.M., and Rothblum, E.D. (2005) 'Coping with Prejudice and Discrimination Based on Weight' in Chin, J.L., (ed) The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination: Disability, religion, physique, and other traits, Westport CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 112-134. Nanfeldt, S. (1996) The Plus-Size Guide to Looking Great, New York: Plume. Neumark-Sztainer, D. (1997) 'The weight dilemma: A range of philosophical perspectives,' International Journal Of Obesity, 23, 31-37. Newman, L. (1991) Belinda's Bouquet, Los Angeles: Alyson Wonderland. Nichols, G. (1984) The Fat Black Woman's Poems, London: Virago. Nimoy, L. (2007) The Full Body Project: Photographs by Leonard Nimoy, Minneapolis: Consortium. Ogden, J. (1992) Fat Chance! The Myth of Dieting Explained, London: Routledge. Oliver, J. E. (2006) Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind America's Obesity Epidemic, New York: Oxford University Press US. Oliver-Pyatt, W. (2004) Fed Up! Chicago: Contemporary Books. Orbach, S. (1978) Fat Is A Feminist Issue: How to lose weight permanently – without dieting, London: Arrow Books. Pieterman, R. (2007) 'The Social Construction of Fat: Care and Control in the Public Concern for Healthy Behaviour,' Sociology Compass, 1:1, 309-321. Polivy, J. and Herman, P. (1983) Breaking The Diet Habit, New York: Basic Books. Popkin, B.M. and Doak, C.M. (1998) 'The obesity epidemic is a worldwide phenomenon,' Nutrition Reviews, 56:4, 106-144. Probyn, E. (2008) 'Silences Behind the Mantra: Critiquing Feminist Fat,' Feminism & Psychology, 18:3, 401-404. Roberts, N. (1985) Breaking All the Rules: Looking Good and Feeling Great No Matter What Your Size, London: Penguin. Robison, J. (2007) NAAFA's Open Letter to the Rudd Center, available: http://www.naafaonline.com/dev2//about/Newsletters/Spring%202007%20NAAFA%2 0Newsletter.html [accessed: 11.3.09]. Ross, K. and Moorti, S. (2005) 'Commentary and Criticism: Is Fat Still a Feminist Issue?' Feminist Media Studies, 5:1, 83—104. Saguy, A.C. and Almeling, R. (2005) 'Fat Panic! The ―Obesity Epidemic‖ as Moral Panic,' American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia available from: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p22928_index.html [accessed 12.3.09]. –– (2008) 'Fat in the Fire? Science, the News Media, and the "Obesity Epidemic"', Sociological Forum, 23:1, 53-83. Saguy, A.C. and Riley, K.W. (2005) 'Weighing Both Sides: Morality, Mortality, and Framing Contests over Obesity,' Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 30:5, 869-923. Schlosser, E. (2001) Fast Food Nation: the dark side of the all-American meal, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Schmidt, C. (1985) 'Do Something About Your Weight,' in Browne, S.E., Connors, D. and Stern, N. (eds) With The Power of Each Breath: A Disabled Woman's Anthology, San Francisco: Cleis Press, 248-252. Schoenfielder, L. and Wieser, B. (1983), Shadow On A Tightrope: Writings By Women on Fat Oppression, San Francisco: Aunt Lute. Schroeder, C.R. (1992) Fat is Not a Four-letter Word, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Schwarz, H. (1986) Never Satisfied: Social History of Diets, Fantasies and Fat, New York: The Free Press. Scott-Dixon, K. (2008) 'Big girls don't cry: Fitness, fatness, and the production of feminist knowledge,' Sociology Of Sport Journal, 25:1, 22-47. Seid, R.P. (1989) Never Too Thin: Why Women are at War with Their Bodies, New York: Prentice Hall Press. Shanker, W. (2005) The Fat Girl's Guide To Life, New York: Bloomsbury. Shaw, A. E. (2006) The embodiment of disobedience: fat black women's unruly political bodies, Lanham MD: Lexington Books. Smith, H. (1989) 'Creating a politics of appearance,' Trouble & Strife 16. Sobal, J. and Maurer, D. (1999a) Weighty Issues: Fatness and Thinness as Social Problems, New Jersey: Aldine Transaction. –– (1999b) Interpreting Weight: The Social Management of Fatness and Thinness, New Jersey: Aldine Transaction. Solovay, S. (2000) Tipping The Scales of Justice: Fighting Weight-Based Discrimination, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Solovay, S. and Rothblum, E.D. (2009) The Fat Studies Reader, New York: New York University Press. Soudan, S. and French, D. (1990) Big Knits: Bold, Beautiful, Designer Knitwear, London: Century. Stearns, P.N. (2002) Fat History: Bodies and Beauty in the Modern West, New York University Press. Stinson, S. (1993) Belly Songs: In Celebration of Fat Women, Northampton MA. –– (1994) Fat Girl Dances with Rocks, New York: Spinsters Ink. –– (1996) Martha Moody, London: The Women's Press. –– (2004) Venus of Chalk, Ann Arbor MI: Firebrand Books. Sturmer, S., Simon, B., Loewy, M., Jorger, H. (2003) 'The dual-pathway model of social movement participation: The case of the fat acceptance movement,' Social Psychology Quarterly, 66:1, 71-82. Swami, V., Furnham, A., Amin, R., Chaudhri, J., Joshi, K., Jundi, S., Miller, R., Mirza- Begum, J., Begum, F.N., Sheth, P. and Tovee, M.J. (2008) 'Lonelier, Lazier, and Teased: The Stigmatizing Effect of Body Size,' Journal of Social Psychology, 148:5, 577-593. Swami, V. and Tovee, M. (2009) 'Big Beautiful Women: The Body Size Preferences of Male Fat Admirers,' Journal of Sex Research, 46:1, 89-96. Swee Kian Tay, C. (2003) Slim Chance, Fat Hope: Society's Obsession with Thinness, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd. Tenzer, S. (1989) 'Fat acceptance therapy (F.A.T.): A non-dieting group approach to physical wellness, insight and self-acceptance,' Women & Therapy, 8:1, 39-47. Thone, R.R. (1997) Fat – a Fate Worse Than Death: Women, Weight, and Appearance, New York: Haworth Press. Throsby, K. (2007) '"How could you let yourself get like that?" Stories of the origins of obesity in accounts of weight loss surgery,' Social Science & Medicine, 65:8, 1561- 1571. –– (2008) 'Happy Re-birthday: Weight Loss Surgery and the New Me,' Body & Society, 14: 1, 117-133. Tischner, I. and Malson, H. (2008) 'Exploring the politics of women's in/visible "large" bodies,' Feminism & Psychology, 18:2, 260-267. Tomrley, C. and Kaloski Naylor, A. (2009) Fat Studies In The UK, York: Raw Nerve Books. Tomrley, C. (2009) 'Introduction: Finding the fat, the fighting and the fabulous, or: The political, personal and pertinent imperatives of FSUK', in Tomrley, C. and Kaloski Naylor, A. (eds) Fat Studies In The UK, York: Raw Nerve Books, 9-16. van der Ziel, C. and Tourville, J. (2002) Big, Beautiful, and Pregnant: Expert Advice and Comforting Wisdom for the Expecting Plus-Size Woman, New York: Marlowe & Co. Walkerdine, V. (2008) 'Biopedagogies and Beyond,' in Wright, J. and Harwood, V. (2008) Biopolitics and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies, London: Taylor & Francis, 199-208. Wann (1998) Fat!So? Because you don't have to apologise for your size, Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press. Wilding, J. (1997) 'Science, medicine, and the future: Obesity treatment,' BMJ 315, 997-1000. Wolf, N. (1990) The Beauty Myth, London: Chatto. Wooley, O.W. and Wooley, S.C. (1979) 'Obesity and Women I – A Closer Look At The Facts' and 'Obesity and Women II – A Neglected Feminist Topic,' Women's Studies International Quarterly 2. World Health Organization (1998) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic, Geneva: World Health Organization Wright, J. and Harwood, V. (2008) Biopolitics and the Obesity Epidemic: Governing Bodies, London: Taylor & Francis. Zellman, F. (2009) Fat Poets Speak: Voices of The Fat Poet's Society, Nashville TN: Pearlsong Press.