Written and Edited By: The Heretic Assassin The question lies ahead, can a man legally practice having more than one wife? Or The Most High just kepted himself muted and defenselless while letting his elected Prophets, Priests, Kings, Messengers, Judges, to spit on the face of Our Heavenly Father? Which of the two is correct? Does the women show more wisdom that men, who Our Heavenly Father has dealt with first in that regards, while the men is stuck on getting pu$$y and overlooking the opinion that they are prohibited in practicing The LAW of POLYGAMY!! The problem with the women is that they are selfish and doesn't show any sense of support when it becomes to specific laws from Our Heavenly Father and they think the have an answer when they really don't. It's not really their faults because they are on the receiving end of the knowledge and wisom of certain MEN TEACHERS and although I respect them, the Majority of them refuse to jump out of theit CONTENT ZONE and start blasting these BOLD, PROUD, ARROGANT, AND FOOLISH WOMEN WHO KNOW THAT THEY ARE ISRAEL BUT ARE TO DEEP SEATED WITH PRIDE TO ACCEPT THE TRUTH THAT THE MOST HIGH AS CREATED MEN IN HIS IMAGE, BUT CREATED THE WOMAN IN THE IMAGE OF MAN, SO THERE FORE, THE MOST HIGH HAS PURPOSELY WITH HESITATION, LIMITED THE "CIVIL RIGHTS" OF WOMEN, BUT EXTENED THE RIGHTS OF THE MAN, BECAUSE HE CREATED US WITH A SIMLITUDE and on of the simitude is what?......WE BOTH HAVE THE IMPLEMENT TO BEGAT, WHICH MEANS TO BRING INTO EXISTANCE, BRING INTO BEING, OR BRING INTO LIFE!! Even The Honorable Apostle Paul even SUBSCRIBED TO THE OLD TESTAMENT LAWS, PROPHETS AND SAYINGS that the HEAD OF THE WOMAN IS THE MAN Peep out what he said in (1st Corinthians 11:3:7-9)
1st Corinthians 11:3.7-9 (King James Version)
3.) But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 7.) For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. 8.) For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. 9.) Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man So there it is, Paul expounding on the fact that THE MAN was SHAPED AND CARVED IN THE IMAGE OF OUR HEAVENLY FATHER, while THE WOMAN WAS CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF THEI HUSBANDS. THAT IS THE COLUMN OF ORDER THAN TH
MOST HIGH AS BESTOWED UPON US. AND EVERY DECISION HE MAKES IS WITHOUT QUESTION FLAWLESS AND WITHOUT BLEMISH!! Lets go precept upon precept, in other words, LET'S CONNECT THE MISSING PIECES OF THE PUZZLE SO WE CAN MAKE SENSE OF WHAT PAUL WAS DEFENDING (AND THAT'S FOR ALL OF YOU ANTI-PAUL CONSTITUENTS)
Genesis 1:26-27 (King James Version)
26.) And God said, Let us MAKE MAN IN OUR IMAGE, after our likeness: and let THEM (THE MEN) HAVE DOMINION over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27.) So God created MAN in his own image, in the image of God created he HIM; male and female created he them. NOTICE HOW THE AUTHOR OF THIS BOOK, MASHAH (MOSES IF YOU WILL) PUTS EMPHASIS ON THE FACT THAT THE MOST HIGH CREATED THE MAN ON HIS IMAGE AND EXLUDED THE WOMEN!! HIS WORD SAYS THAT THE MAN WAS GIVING THE LAWFUL RIGHT TO BE **OVERSEERS** OVER THE WOMAN, THE CREATURE THAT STROLLS UPON THE GROUND AND THE CREATURE THAT DWELL IN THE WATERS. ALSO NOTICE THAT AT THE END OF THE SENTENCE, THE MOST HIGH THROUGH MOSES SAYS THAT "MALE AND FEMALE" HE CREATED THEM. HE PUT EMPHASIS ON THE MAN SEPERATELY IN TERMS OF DOMINIONSHIP BY USING TERMS THAT IS ONLY REFERING TO THE MAN SUCH AS **MAN** AND **HIM**. THE SCRIPTURES JUST SAY THE HE CREATED THE FEMALE, BUT SHE WAS **NEVER** INCLUSIVE IN EARTHLY SOVEREIGNTY BECAUSE JUST LIKE PAUL SAYS, THE WOMAN WAS CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF MAN, THAT'S WHY IN THE BOOK OF GENESIS CHAPTER 6, THE WOMEN ARE REFERED TO **THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN**, ONCE AGAIN SETTING UP THE EXCLAMATION POINT THAT THE WOMEN WAS SHUT OUT IN BEING IN THE IMAGE OF OUR HEAVENLY FATHER!!!
(Ecclesiasticus/Sirach. 17:1-4) 1. The Lord created MAN out of earth, and turned him back to it again.
2. He gave to MEN few days, a limited time, BUT GRANTED THEM AUTHORITY OVER THE THINGS UPON THE EARTH. 3. He ENDOWED THEM (THE MEN) WITH STRENGTH like his own, and MADE THEM (THE MEN) IN HIS OWN IMAGE. 4. He placed the fear of them in all living beings, and granted them dominion over beasts and birds
Let's get into the topic/arguement in regards to POLYGAMY/MULTIPLE MARRIAGES, HAS IT BEEN BANNED LIKE THE OPPONENTS SAY? LET'S SEE WHAT OUR SAVIOR, YAHAWAH HA BAN (GOD THE SON), HA MASHIYACH (THE MESSIAH) SAYS ABOUT THIS BY GENERALLY SPEAKING IN THE LAW (WHICH INCLUDES POLYGAMY)
Matthew 5:17-19 (King James Version) 17.) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18.) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19.) Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. So the laws that his didn't put away such as the 10 Commandments, The Social Responibility Laws, Dietary Laws, Marriage Laws (including Practical Additional Wives), etc. are still applicable to us as we speak. The
Prophecies in the Scriptures and the Epistles are still applicable to us also apparently by us NEGROES fulfilling the prophecies in (Deuteronomy 28:15-68) in regards to us coming into the shores of the Western Hemisphere (The Americas) in cargo slave ships as well as the Future Prophecies in Regards to Isaiah 4:1, lets take a look at that verse since we are on the topic shall we. Isaiah 4:1 (King James Version) 1.) And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach. Some sources, most likely THESE SIMPLE ASS CHRISTIANS would say that the seven women is talking about the 7 CHURCHES in Revelation. THAT IS INCORRECT!! This is real simple, the prophecies in Revelation says that there will be Israelites that will DEPART FROM THOSE 7 CHURCHES!! So if the Israelites depart from the churches/assembly, then common sense will tell you that they are NO LONGER PART OF THE 7 CHURCHES!! The scriptures never testified of 7 diverse/separate churches takin hold of Yahawah Ha Ban (God, the Son or Jesus Christ), it says that ONE CHURCH will submit to Christ, so what's up with this bad and horrible precept of 7 women being symbolic of the 7 churches when there was always ONE CHURCH, ONE ASSEMBLY, which is the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL, THEY ARE THE REAL CHURCH!!! Listen to what this person says in this website, http://hubpages.com/hub/prophecy-isaiah on the comment board about the improper breakdown of Isaiah 4:1, " The lionswhelp
The prophecy in Isaiah did not say that the man wanted to marry the 7 women (churches), but the 7 women (signifying all) took hold of the Lamb of God holding Him tight, and not letting Him go, doing their own thing.The Lamb only wanted one righteous wife" I rest my case, The Lamb only wants one rightous wife and that is once AGAIN THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL!! Correcting the UNLEARNED AND IGNORANT WOMEN'S COMMENTS IN REGARDS TO THE RIGHTEOUS ACT OF PRACTICING PLURAL MARRIAGES. HE ARE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS BY DIFFERENT UNLEARNED ISRAELITE SISTAS WHO CAN'T STAND THE FACT THAT THE MOST HIGH HAVE GIVING US MEN EXTENDED RIGHTS COMPARED TO THE WOMEN TO PRACTICE PLURAL MARRIAGES.
(NOTE: I WILL NOT REVEAL THEIR NAMES, BUT ONLY THEIR COMMENTS FROM YOU TUBE) THIS IS FROM THE VIDEO "Let every man have one wife" ON "YOU TUBE" "I agree: marriage is monogamous as it was intended for ADAM & EVE. There were NO other wives prior to them. Also, polygamy started with CAIN's seed (Genesis 4-5), the sick sin murdering son of Adam/Eve in which YAH killed them through the flood. Sarah, Leah, Rachel, Kings David/Solomon & all paid dear prices for polygamy: YHWH NEVER said it was ok!
Lastly, Christ spoke against it (Matthew 5 & 19) & TORAH (Deuteronomy 17 & 24). Israel is a harlot who needs correction. YHWH have mercy!!"
CORRECTION: Let's start with the Mind games this anynomus sista is trying to pull by using CAIN, the evil son of ADAM as a reason to reject POLYGAMY as a LAWFUL ACT.
Yes, it is true that CAIN pulled the trigger (symbolically speakin) and assassinated his own brother, ABEL, but let's go back even further to his Ancestors, ADAM and EVE, who originated SO CALLED MONOGAMY. Let the record show that the Sins of EVE and ADAM have contributed to WOMEN GOING THROUGH EXCRUCIATING PAIN IN THE MIDST OF THEM GIVING BIRTH TO A CHILD, US MEN HAS TO WORK OUR ASSES OFF BECAUSE OF THEIR SINS, AND WORST YET, THROUGH THE WOMAN (EVE) WE ALL DIE!! SO TECHNICALLY, EVE MAY BE "MOTHER OF ALL LIVING", BUT FOR THE MOST PART, SHE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR SUCCOMBING ALSO AS WE SPEAK TODAY AND THERE IS NO GETTING AROUND THAT. THE WOMEN IS THE MOST INFURIOR VESSEL OUT OF THE TWO GENDERS WHICH CAN RESULT AND A LOT OF DOWNFALLS BECAUSE WITHOUT THE MAN GUIDING HER WITH THE CORRECT KNOWLEDGE, SHE REMAINS GULLIABLE AND FOOLISH. THE WICKED WOMAN HAS BEEN PROVEN TIME AFTER TIME THAT THEY ARE THE MOST POSIONUS INSTRUMENT IN THE HISTORY OF HUMAN CIVILIZATION AND IT STARTED WITH THE MATRIARCH OF ALL RACES OF PEOPLE, EVE. "OF THE WOMAN CAME THE BEGINING OF SIN, AND THROUGH HER WE ALL DIE!!!."(Ecclesiasticus 25:22) AND LET ME BE CLEAR ONCE AGAIN, EVE TECHNICALLY MURDERED ALL OF THE RACE OF PEOPLE THAT WE SEEK TODAY ON THIS PLANET EARTH. WHY? BECAUSE SHE COVETED THE MASCULINITY OF HER HUSBAND, ADAM AND TRIED TO TEACH ADAM AND PURSUADE HIM TO HARKEN UNTO HER VOICE, MEANING TO LISTEN TO HER INSTRUCTIONS!!! AND THEY STARTED THE ACT OF MONOGAMY AND THROUGH THE ORIGINATORS OF MONOGAMY, WE ALL DIE!! SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF USING CAIN TO DISCREDIT THE ACT OF POLYGAMY?!?! IT'S GETTING POINTLESS AND THIS EXPLAINS WHY WOMEN DON'T HAVE ANY WISDOM UNLESS THEY ARE DEALING WITH A RIGHTEOUS MAN WHO POSSESES THE CORRECT WISDOM. WITHOUT THE MAN, WOMEN DON'T HAVE A DAMN THING, INCLUDING WISDOM!!! YHWH NEVER SAID IT WAS OK FOR POLYGAMY PRACTICING? LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT ABRAHAM, THE GREAT GRANDFATHER OF THE HEBREW ISRAELITE RACE. HE HAD THREE WIVES AND NOT ONCE YOU FIND ANY SCRIPTURES WHERE THE MOST HIGH PROTESTS
AGAINST THE ACT OF ABRAHAM PRACTICING PLURAL MARRIAGES, SO IF THE MOST HIGH DIDN'T EXPRESS HIS DISSENT OR DISCONTENTMENT, WHY IN THE HELL YOU SIMPLE ASS WOMEN BELIEVE IT?? I CHALLENGE ALL OF YOU TO SHOW ME A SCRIPTURE WHERE THE MOST HIGH VERBALLY EXPRESSED HIS DISAPPROVAL IN US MEN HAVING MORE THAN ONE WIFE?? BITCHES (SPEAKING IN A METAPHORICAL SENSE TO SINFUL WOMEN WHO ARE ON PAR WITH A DOG, NOT ALL WOMEN!!!) STOP BEING SO SELFISH!!! This is from the Web Site, http://www.biblicalpolygamy.com/polygamists/abraham/
"Abraham SO ABRAHAM PERFORMED POLYGAMY BY HAVING A TOTAL OF THREE WIVES, WHICH IS NOT MULTILPLE, BUT AN EXTRA AND ADDITIONAL WIVES. PERIOD!!!
(Genesis 17:1) 1.) And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before me, AND BE THOU PERFECT.
So answer this question Yahsharahla, since The Most High, Our Heavenly Father COMMANDED TO ABRAHAM TO BE PERFECT, MEANING TO SEPERATED HIMSELF FROM THAT WHICH IS EVIL, THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE HAD TO DEPART FROM THE ACT OF POLYGAMY RIGHT? BECAUSE ACCORDING TO Y'ALL SICK-MIDED DOCTRINE, POLYGAMY IS INCORRECT AND SINFUL SO IF THAT'S THE CASE,
THEN WHY DIDN'T THE MOST MIGH ONCE AGAIN, CONDEMN ABRAHAM FROM PRACTICING SUCH A THING? YOU CAN;T ANSWER THAT!!! AND IF YOU DO COME WITH AN ANSWER, I WILL ASSASSINATE YOU TO THE GROUND BECAUSE I KNOW I GOT THE TRUTH IN THIS REGARD. YOU JUST TRY!!!
THIS IS TOWARDS THE IDIOTS WHO THINK THAT WHEN A MAN AND A WOMAN ENGAGES IN A SEXUAL INTERCOURSE, THAT DOESN'T OFFICALLY CONSTITUTES THEM AS HUSBAND AND WIFE!!!
Exodus 22:16 (King James Version) 16.) And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife. So from our Heavenly Father through Our ancient Law Giver/Law Distributor/Mediator, Mashah (Moses or Moshe) to Israel, the proceedure is that if a man entices a maid, meaning if a man hooks up with a woman and she is not betrothed (not committed to marriage, sexually inexperienced) and he interlocks with her and performs a sexual activity, then that man and that woman has officially become HUSBAND AND WIFE!! So this wedding tradition that we seek today is pagan is unlawful. Ain't no damn way a man supposed to be spending $300 to rent a tuxedo and spend thousand of dollars to rent a Church, D.J. Wedding Cake, other meals in the following, just to please that woman, who most likely less cold feet than that man because she realizes that she is being treated like a queen, which was never our Heavenly Father's intent. Marriage is so inexpensive and Cheap brothas and sistas, which benefits that man for the most part, so brothas, if you're reading, this YOU CAN REST EASY!!!
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 (King James Version)
28.) If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; 29.) Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
In this scripture, it says the same thing, the only difference is that if a man takes a VIRGIN WOMAN BY FORCE and go into her (meaning engaging in a sexual activity) then ONCE AGAIN, THAT MAN AND THAT WOMAN OFFICALLY BECOMES HUSBAND AND WIFE, BUT THE MAN HAS TO CONFRONT HER FATHER AND COUGH SOME MONEY OUT OF HIS POCKET!!! NOTE THIS TRUTH: It is true that there were some commandments that was givin to our ancestors, The Descendants of Israel that no longer apply to us for various reasons, such as The "Thou Shall Not Abhor An Edomite" commandment in (Deuteronomy 23:7) which doesn't apply to us no more because The Children of Esau was not as much of a threat to the whole race of Israel until the Days when Haman, the Agagite (Edomite) who plotted to destroy All of the 12 Tribes which was a continuation of the Long Term Rivalry between Jacob and Esau. Then you read and scan the whole 15th Chapter of 1st Samuel where, The Most High actually commands The Israelites to destory the Entire Tribe of Amelek, who is a descendant of Esau/Edom so you know that the Deuteronomy 23:7 law was abolished because it said not to Abhor (hate) them so we couldn't lay a finger on them, but as time changes, the law changes also, so we were licensed to hate our brother Esau was attempting to assassinate the entire tribe of Amelek. Ask yourself this Israel, If I decided that I was to put you on my hit list and had intentions to pluck you out of this planet earth by murdering you, is it out of love or Abhorness and hatred. If you have common sense, you will recognize the correct answer to that. The same goes with the laws of Sacrifice. Our Savior, Yahawah Ha Ban
(God The Son) abolished the Laws of Sacrifice by becoming the Ultimate Sacrifice. So He took the place of that Ram, That Bull, That Calf, That Cow, That Sheep and because we are no longer in our homeland, how can the sacrifical law apply to us? My point in bringing those two specific laws is to say that it's not the same for The Law of Practicing Plural Marriages, the Laws of Plural Marriages still applies to us. There must be a reason why there are immeasurable numbers of women compared to the men, that right there is Our Heavenly Fathers Slick and Subtle way of still subscribing to The Law of Practicing Plural Marriages!!! You women can object all you want to, all you are doing is showing your hypocrasy and you hatred for The Most High's laws especially when it's not at your convenince which IS FRIKKEN SELFISH AND THE MOST HIGH WILL RECORD YOU SOUR BEHAVIOR FOR EXPRESSING YOU DISTASTE FOR HIS LAWS!!
(Genesis 24:67) 67.) And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death. MUCH PROPS TO "MAN UP JACOB" FOR BRINGING OUT THIS SCRIPTURE BACK IN JUNE 2008 WHEN I FIRST GOT INTO THIS TRUTH WHEN THEY WAS TRYING TO EXPLAIN HOW OUR SAVIOR, YAHAWAH HA BAN/YAHAWAHSHI CAME UPON THIS PLANET EARTH THROUGH THE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH JOSEPH AND MARY, WHICH I DON'T AGREE WITH BY THE WAY. I BELIEVE WITHOUT A SHOUT OF A DOUBLT THAT MARY WAS A VIRGIN WHEN SHE GAVE BIRTH TO YAHAWAH HA BAN AND THERE ARE ARCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT THROUGH A EDOMITE NAMED, RON WYATT, BUT THAT'S A WHOLE 'NOTHER TOPIC!! AS YOU CAN SEE THAT ALL ISSAC HAD TO DO WAS TO BRING HIS WIFE, REBEKAH INTO HIS MOTHER'S TENT (HOME) AND AS A RESULT, THEY OFFICALLY BECAME HUSBAND AND WIFE. WHAT THE HELL DO Y'ALL THINK THAT WERE DOING IN THAT TENT? PLAYING PITTY PAT LIKE MAN UP JACOB SAID, OR PLAYING SUPER
CONTRA FOR THE NINTENDO CONSOLE, PLAYING SIMON SAYS, BREAKDANCING, DOING THE NEW ORLEANS SECONDLINING? NO!!! HE WAS BANGING THAT FLESH YA HEARD ME? I SAID THAT I WAS GOING TO ANALYZE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "ADDITION" AND "MULTIPLICATION" OF COURSE THERE ARE SOME SIMILARITES AND THAT SIMILARITY IS THAT THE BOTH INCREASE AND NUMBER AND NEVER REDUCE IN NUMBERS, But when you are dealing with ADDITION, you are only increasing numbers, BIT, BY BIT, BY BIT. In other words, they increase in number once at a time. It's kind of like taking one slice of PIZZA at a time and i'm going to expound later on why I put emphasis on PIZZA in regards to this breakdown. When ADDITION is being dealt with, you will recognize that it doesn't increase plentifully by THE BUNCH AT ONCE! It doesn't OVERINDULFGE IN NUMBERS!! Which gets me into the conversation in MULTIPLICATION When you are dealing with MULTIPLICATION, you will realize that there is a difference in paralells to ADDITION. TO MULTIPLY MEAN TO GAIN AN ABUNDANCE. I'MA GIVE YOU TWO EXAMPLES OF ADDITION AND MULTIPLICATION DO YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT ABRAHAM, LAMECH, JACOB, MOSES, ISSACHAR, DAVID AND OTHERS DID BY JUST ADDING AND GAINING EXTRA WIVES AND SOLOMON BY MULTIPLYING WIVES WHICH WAS HIS DOWNFALL AS PROPHECIED IN (DEUTERONOMY 17:17)!!!!!!
ADDITION = (1.) 2+4= 6 (2.) 4+4= 8 MULTIPLICATION =
(1.) 2x4= 8 (2.) 4x4=16
Here is another PROPER BREAKDOWN OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MULTIPLYING WIVES AND SIMPLY JUST ADDING OR GETTING EXTRA WIVES FROM: http://www.biblicalpolygamy.com/exegesis/not-multiply-wives/
"Not Multiply Wives (1_Kings 11:3-4): Solomon multiplied wives (up to 1,000!) which was prohibited and prophesied that a king would do in (Deuteronomy 17:17). But that passage in (1_Kings 11:3-4) says his father David's heart was "perfect". Indeed, as the previous verse of (Deuteronomy 17:16) also prohibits a king from multiplying horses, no one would read that to think that it suggests that a king was somehow not able to have/add more than one horse! As such, there is a clear difference between multiplying and merely adding. And this can be seen as the difference between Solomon and his father David. Where Solomon had multiplied (i.e., stored-up, hoarded), David had only added his 18+ wives. (In Genesis 25:1, "Then AGAIN Abraham took a wife... Keturah". The word,"AGAIN", there translates to add --or "augment"-- in the Hebrew. And, indeed, Abraham WAS ADDING HIS THIRD WIFE, KETURAH TO HIMSELF.) So, Solomon's sin was multiplying wives (which turned his heart away from God) while his father David had simply added wives. Hence, adding more than one wife is biblically acceptable (just as David did), whereas multiplying wives (just as Solomon did) is what
was prohibited in (Deuteronomy 17:14,17)."
DID YOU SEE THAT YAHSHARAHLA? THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN ADDING AND MULTIPLYING WIVES!!! SOLOMON'S SIN BESIDES MARRY WOMEN OUTSIDE OF HIS RACE WAS THAT HE MULTIPLYING WIVES AS OPPOSING TO JUST ADDING WIVES WHICH MEANS HE OVERINDULDGE THE WOMEN UNDER HIS BELT IN NUMBERS!! HE HAD TOO MANY WIVES FOR HIS OWN GOOD. KEEP IN MIND ON WHY WE (ISRAELITES AS ELECTED KINGS) COULDN'T HAVE MULTIPLE WIVES IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THAT WAS BECAUSE HAVING A MILITARY FULL OF WIVES WOULD CAUSE HIM TO CAST HIS ATTENTION INTO PLEASING HIS WIVES AS OPPOSED TO PLEASING THE MOST HIGH AND HELL PAUL EVEN TALKED ABOUT THIS AND HE WS REFERENG TO A MONOGAMUS MARRIAGE!!! SCRIPTUAL PROOF OF THAT? HERE IT IS:
(1st Corinthians 7:32-33)
33.) But HE THAT IS MARRIED careth for the things that are OF THE WORLD, how HE MAY PLEASE HIS WIFE. 32.) But I would have you without carefulness. He that is UNMARRIED CARETH FOR THE THINGS THAT BELONG TO THE MOST HIGH, HOW HE MAY PLEASE THE HEAVENLY FATHER:
SO THAT WAS THE REASON WHY IT WAS AGAINST THE LAW (FOR KINGS ONLY, FOR KINGS ONLY!!) TO HAVE MULTIPLE WIVES BECAUSE THEY WOULD END UP CARING FOR THE THINGS THAT ARE OF THE WORLD, OF ANY CORRUPTED SOCIETY THAT HE LABORS HARD TO KEEP HIS WIFE/WIVES CONTENT AND SATISFIED!!!! SO THERE IT IS ONCE AGAIN, SHUTING DOWN THIS IDIOTIC THEORY THAT'S BEING PUSHED BY THIS FEMALE FASCIST, FEMALE TERRORISTIC ISRAELITE MOVEMENT IN USING SCRIPTURES WITHOUT ANY WISDOM, BUT STUPIDITY IN TRYING TO
MANIPULATE MEN INTO NOT SERVING THE MOST HIGH PROPERLY. IF A MAN IS FINANCIALLY STABLE TO A POINT WHERE HE IS ABLE TO TAKE CARE THE BILLS, UTILITIES, HIMSELF, HIS FIRST WIFE, CHILDREN AND AND EXTRA LOOT ON THE SIDE TO TAKE CARE OF ANOTHER WIFE, THEN I SAY GO FOR IT!! BUT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE THE FINANCAIL CONTENTMENT IN OBTAINING ANOTHER WIFE, DON'T DO IT, BECAUSE THAT WILL CAUSE TENSION BETWEEN THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD (APPARENTLY THE MAN) THE FIRST WIFE AND THE SECOND WIFE, NOT TO MENTION, CHILDREN, BUT IN THE NEWLY AND UNDEFILED KINGDOM, YOU BEST BELIEVE THAT MEN WOULD BE PRACTICING POLYGAMY PERFECTLY WITHOUT HESITATION AND THE ISRAELITE WOMEN WILL LOVE IT!!! TO BE CONTINUED............