2008_10-26__Obamas Citizenship_ Lies and Morality Exposed

Document Sample
2008_10-26__Obamas Citizenship_ Lies and Morality Exposed Powered By Docstoc
					     Obama's Citizenship, Lies & Morality Exposed
                  Teaching Overview: A Pennsylvania lawsuit alleging that Barack
                  Obama is not a "natural-born citizen" of the U.S. took an unusual
                  twist recently, after a federally mandated deadline requiring Obama's
                  lawyers to produce a "vault" copy of his birth certificate expired with
                  no response from Obama or his lawyers. The lawsuit, filed by former
Dr. Scott Johnson Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General Philip J. Berg alleges that
                  Barack Obama was born in at The Coast Provincial General Hospital
                  at Mombasa in Kenya at 7.24 PM on August 4th 1961 (Just like his
                  own Grandmother has already confirmed) and is thus “ineligible” to
                  run for president of the United States. By failing to respond to the
                  Request for Admissions and Request for the Production of
                  Documents within 30 days, Obama has “admitted” that he was born
                  in Kenya, Berg stated this week in new court filings by violating the
                  Federal Rules of Civil Procedures. Instead of responding (because
                  they are above the law), lawyers for Obama and the DNC asked the
                  court to dismiss the case; & Judge R. Barclay Surrick did just that
                  10/25/08 and never even addressed the birth certificate issue. Berg
                  plans to appeal his case to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and
                  then to the United States Supreme Court if necessary. Obama is
                  without a doubt the most dangerous presidential candidate ever to
                  come along. We will be looking at the extensive documentation
                  proving his ties to Islam, Communism, Marxism, Socialism, Pro-
                  Homosexual & the Pro-Abortion/Infanticide movements over the
                  course of this study. We will also be talking about the rampant voter
                  fraud in America and the Electoral College.

                      Watch the Short Video for Verification:

Excellent Synopsis: My Mother's Birth Certificate - And Obama's

Democrat: Obama's grandma confirms Kenyan birth
'This has been a real sham he's pulled off for the last 20 months'
   Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court
   Lawsuit - Obama’s “Not” Qualified to be President
   Obama Should Immediately Withdraw his Candidacy for
For Immediate Release: - 10/21/08 - Complete contact details and pdfs of this press
   release and motions filed by plaintiff Berg today are at the end of this article
    obama (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the
    Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of
    “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama
    and tbe DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for
    Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is
    “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw
    his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate. The
    case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response
   by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to
   the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of
   the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore,
   Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.

OBAMA - Admitted:

1. I was born in Kenya.2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen.

3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.4. My father, Barrack Hussein
   Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me.

5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.6. My mother’s maiden name is Stanley
    Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.

7. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website “” is a
    forgery.8. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen.

9. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.10. I was not born in Hawaii.

11. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii.12. I was not born at Kapi’olani
    Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii.

13. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii.14. I am a citizen of Indonesia.
15. I never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain my U.S. Citizenship status.16. I am not a
    “natural born” United States citizen.

17. My date of birth is August 4, 1961.18. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan

19. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan.20. Pakistan was a no travel zone in
    1981 for American Citizens.

21. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter their country.22. I
   traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan.

23. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan.24. My senior campaign staff
    is aware I am not a “natural born” United States Citizen.

25. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage.26. My relatives have requested changes to the
   portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.

27. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies
    my last name.28. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth
    certificate that identifies my place of birth.

29. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.30.
    I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.

31. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of
    birth.32. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from Fransiskus
    Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine.

33. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed.34. I went to a Senator and/or
    Congressman or other public official in Hawaii to have my name changed.

35. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia.36. The United States
    Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United
    States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.

37. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or
    Vice President of the United States.38. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to
    my citizenship to the country of Indonesia.

39. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of
   Kenya.40. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law.

41. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth.42. Kenya did not
    become its own Republic until 1963.
43. I am not a “Naturalized” United States Citizen.44. I obtained $200 Million dollars in
    campaign funds by fraudulent means.

45. I cannot produce a “vault” (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in
    Hawaii.46. My “vault” (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.

47. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups or medical treatments
    for illnesses.48. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record
    of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.

49. Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have
    any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.50. I was
    born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.

51. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name
    other than Barack Hussein Obama.52. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.

53. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro.54. I took an Oath
    to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to
    practice Law.

55. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my
    United States Senate Office.56. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country
    besides the United States of America.

DNC - Admitted:

1. The DNC nominated Barrack Hussein Obama as the Democratic Nominee for
   President.2. The DNC has not vetted Barrack Hussein Obama.

3. The DNC did not have a background check performed on Barrack Hussein Obama.4.The
    DNC did not verify Barrack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the
    United States.

5. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.6. The DNC admits
   Barrack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born” United States citizen.

7. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was not born in Hawaii.8.The DNC admits
    they have not inquired into Barrack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status.

9. The DNC admits they have a duty to properly vette the Democratic Nominee for
   President.10.The DNC admits Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen adopted
   Barrack Hussein Obama.
11. The DNC admits the Credentials Committee has been aware of this lawsuit since
   August 22, 2008 as the lawsuit was faxed to our Washington D.C. Office on August 22,
   12. The DNC admits their Credentials Committee failed to verify and/or inquire into the
   credentials of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as the President of the United States.

13. The DNC admits their Credential Committee’s Report failed to address the issues of
    Barack Hussein Obama’s ineligibility to serve as President of the United States.14.The
    DNC admits Howard Dean, Chair Person has and had knowledge Barack Hussein
    Obama was born in Kenya and ineligible to serve as the President of the United States.

15. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all Democratic citizens of the United States have been
    personally injured as a result of not having a qualified Democratic Presidential Nominee
    to cast their votes upon.16. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United
    States have a Constitutional Right to vote for the President of the United States and to
    have two (2) qualified candidates of which to choose from.

17. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional right
    to have a properly vetted Democratic Presidential Nominee of which to cast their
    vote.18. The DNC admits an FBI background check is not performed on the Presidential
    or Vice Presidential Candidates.

19. The DNC admits the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the
    office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United
    States citizen.20. The DNC admits they collected donations on behalf of Barack
    Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.

21. The DNC admits Plaintiff and Democratic citizens donated money based on false
   representations that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified to serve as the President of
   the United States.22. The DNC admits if Barack Hussein Obama is elected as
   President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of our
   Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis.

23. The DNC admits Barack Hussein Obama took an Oath to uphold the United States
    Constitution.24. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to
    serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to due process of law in
    violation of the United States Constitution.

25. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as
    President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to Equal Protection of the laws in
    violation of the United States Constitution.26. The DNC admits the function of the DNC
    is to secure a Democratic Presidential Candidate who will protect Democratic citizen’s
    interests, fight for their equal opportunities and fight for justice for all Americans.
    27. The DNC admits the Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack
       Hussein Obama’s Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President
       of the United States.

    Our website now has 50.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread
       the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers, radio and TV stations.
       Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people,
       are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

    Philip J. Berg, Esquire
        555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
        Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
        Cell 610-662-3005
        (800) 993-PHIL [7445]
        Fax (610) 834-7659

                                      File                                Description
          Motion for Expedited Ruling on Plaintiff\’s Motion for Order                  67 Kb
       re Req. for Admissi
         Obama, Motion for Order deeming Request for Admissions
                                                                                        227 Kb
         Press Release Obama - DNC Admit All Allegations of
       Federal Court Lawsuit.

Is Obama a US Citizen?--Birth Certificate (Video): Posted Birth
Certificate Appears to be a Fake Document
Is Obama a US Citizen? The Birth Certificate presented by the Obama campaign has been
photo shopped. Obama has posted what appears to be a fake birth certificate on his "smears"
page to end rumors that he is not a US Citizen. If he has nothing to hide, why post a fake
document? For $10 he can get a new one. It appears the image posted on Obama's "smears"
page is a copy of what was posted by "Kos". Doesn't Obama have a certified copy? Why did his
own campaign have to copy it off a blog?

The Actual Court Case that May Overturn the Election (pdf): CIVIL
ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083,%20Motion%20for

Lawsuit Filed Against Obama-Does Not Qualify For President
Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania 08/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, [Berg is a former Deputy
Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate in
Democratic Primaries; former Chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery County; former
member of Democratic State Committee; an attorney with offices in Montgomery County, PA
and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA, filed a lawsuit in Federal Court today, Berg vs.
Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083, seeking a Declaratory Judgment and an Injunction that
Obama does not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States. Berg filed this suit
for the best interests of the Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States. 1. Where
was Obama born? Hawaii; an island off of Hawaii; Kenya; Canada; or ? 2. Was he a citizen of
Kenya, Indonesia and/or Canada? 3. What was the early childhood of Obama in Hawaii; in
Kenya; in Indonesia when he was adopted; and later, back to Hawaii? 4. An explanation as to
the various names utilized by Obama that include: Barack Hussein Obama; Barry Soetoro;
Barry Obama; Barack Dunham; and Barry Dunham. 5. Illinois Bar Application Obama fails to
acknowledge use of names other than Barack Hussein Obama, a blatant lie.

If Obama can prove U.S. citizenship, we still have the issue of muti-citizenship with
responsibilities owed to and allegance to other countries.

Berg continued:

Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their time and energy,
worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but voted for her and often
recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for
nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a fraudulent candidacy and cheated
legitimately eligible natural born citizens from competing in a fair process and the supporters of
their citizen choice for the nomination.

Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by Senator
Obama's lies and obfuscations. He clearly shows a conscience of guilt by his actions in using
the forged birth certificate and the lies he's told to cover his loss of citizenship. We believe he
does know, supported this belief by his actions in hiding his secret, in that he failed to regain his
citizenship and used documents to further his position as a natural born citizen. We would also
show he proclaims himself a Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had no
eligibility to become President except by means of lying, obfuscations and deceptions. His very
acts proves he knew he was no longer a natural born citizen. We believe he knew he was
defrauding the country or else why use the forged birth certificate of his half sister?

Americans lost money, goods and services donated in their support of a candidate who
supposedly was a natural born citizen simply because the DNC officers and party leaders
looked the other way and did not demand credentials to answer the questions and prove
whether or not Senator Obama was a legitimately natural born citizen, even in light of recent
information that has surfaced on websites on the Internet suggesting Senator Obama may not
be eligible to become President and questioning his status of multiple citizenships and
questionable loyalties! If the DNC officers and.or leaders had performed one ounce of due
diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from
making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship as a child and failed to even
perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship through an oath of allegiance at age eighteen
[18] as prescribed by Constitutional laws!

The injunctrive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction defrauds everyone
who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair representation of the voters.
Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted, fraudulent nomination process to
continue. It not only allows, but promotes an overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates
such a lack of confidence in voters of the primary process itself, so that it would cement a
prevailing belief that no potential candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect our
election process, follow the Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying and
defrauding voters to get onto the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they fraudulently
manage to get elected! It is unfair to the country for candidates of either party to become the
nominee when there is any question of their ability to serve if elected.
Watch the Video:
                                        ELECTION 2008
         2nd lawsuit challenges Obama's citizenship
 Man demands state verify birth records or remove senator from ballots
                                    Posted: October 16, 2008

By Chelsea Schilling

                                  In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's
"natural born" citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original
or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.
Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court,
calling for Secretary of State
Sam Reed to determine whether Obama

is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the
authority to "prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters" who might have
otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show
Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen.
"At this point, Mr. Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his birth
records nor supporting hospital records," Marquis wrote. "The Hawaii Health
Department has violated Federal law by ignoring formal Freedom of Information
requests for the same."
Marquis referenced prominent Pennsylvania Democrat and attorney Philip J. Berg's
lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Sen. Barack Obama and the Democratic National
Committee for proof of Obama's American citizenship.
(Story continues below)

"Mr. Obama failed to respond to the District Court's request to produce or allow access
to the official documents (should they exist) and instead filed a motion to dismiss
arguing the Plaintiff had no 'standing' or right to know," he said. "This non-response as
of 9/24/2008 in Federal court casts doubt on the veracity of the electoral system and is
the principal reason for this lawsuit."
Marquis said his late entry of the lawsuit is due to Obama's "delay and subsequent non
response to reasonable request for valid certificates."
He indicated that his requests for certification of the birth documents were rejected by
Washington's Office of the Secretary of State. Marquis requested an injunction to force
the office to confirm Obama's U.S. citizenship or remove his name from Washington
ballots. He said the agency is "specifically charged with certifying and guaranteeing the
veracity of official documents and overseeing the elections to wit the people's
confidence in the fundamental aspect of democracy is maintained."
However, Marquis continued, "To date, in this regard, Secretary of State Sam Reed has
not carried out that fundamental duty."

Related offers:
Get Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation," autographed by the author, exclusively from
WND's online store.
"The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama's War on American Values"
"NObama" magnetic bumper sticker
Whistleblower magazine's "THE SECRET LIFE OF BARACK OBAMA"
Get the book that launched the "None of the Above" political movement – personally
signed by the author. It comes with a free "None of the Above" magnetized bumper
Help spread the word about the "None of the Above" campaign with extra copies of the
magnetized bumper sticker.
Proudly display the hottest campaign button in the nation – "None of the Above." Buy
them in bulk at phenomenal prices.
Previous stories:
DNC seeks to silence lawsuit over Obama birth certificate
Democrat sues Sen. Obama over 'fraudulent candidacy'
2 campaigns seek 'truth' about Obama's birth
Obama birth certificate: Real or phony baloney?
Blogger reveals Obama birth certificate
Is Obama's candidacy constitutional?
Limbaugh shows Obama stumbles without his notes
Obama denies Michelle made derogatory remark
Obama's VP team has link to Marc Rich
Did Hamas 'un-endorse' Obama?
Nation of Islam activists on Obama camp payroll
Obama's military claims inconsistent with records
Can Obama see dead people?
Obama commits Holocaust gaffe?
Obama misrepresented tie with Palestinian activist?
Report: Obama mentored by Communist Party figure
Obama raised funds for Islamic causes
Obama worked with terrorist
Obama campaign: Mum's the word!
Obama-Farrakhan link off-limits
NBC admits bias toward Obama

Chelsea Schilling is a staff writer for WorldNetDaily

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. – Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is
canceling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to visit his suddenly
gravely ill 85-year-old grandmother in Hawaii, a spokesman said.
Robert Gibbs told reporters aboard Obama's plane that Madelyn Payne Dunham, who
helped raise Obama, was released from the hospital late last week. But he said her
health had deteriorated "to the point where her situation is very serious."
Events originally planned for Madison, Wis., and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday will be
replaced by one in Indianapolis before he makes the long flight to Hawaii. On Friday,
Obama's wife, Michelle, will sub for Obama at rallies in Akron and Columbus, in Ohio,
said campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki. Obama was expected to resume campaigning
on Saturday, at an undecided location in the West, she said.
"Sen. Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, has always been one of the most
important people in his life, along with his mother and his grandfather," Gibbs said.
"Recently his grandmother has become ill and in the last few weeks her health has
deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious. It is for that reason that
Sen. Obama has decided to change his schedule on Thursday and Friday so that he
can see her and spend some time with her."
Citing the family's desire for privacy, Gibbs would not discuss the nature of Dunham's
illness. It seemed likely that she was close to death, as Gibbs said that "everyone
understands the decision that Sen. Obama is making." Dunham turns 86 on Sunday.
It could be a momentous one in his bid for the White House against Republican John
McCain, with Election Day just two weeks away on Nov. 4.
In a campaign ad this year, Obama described his Dunham as the daughter of a Midwest
oil company clerk who "taught me values straight from the Kansas heartland" — things
like "accountability and self-reliance. Love of country. Working hard without making
excuses. Treating your neighbor as you'd like to be treated."
She's also the "white grandmother" he referred to in a speech on race.
Obama recognized Dunham when he accepted the Democratic presidential nomination
at the party's convention in Denver.
"She's the one who taught me about hard work. She's the one who put off buying a new
car or a new dress for herself so that I could have a better life. She poured everything
she had into me. And although she can no longer travel, I know that she's watching
tonight, and that tonight is her night as well," he said.
Obama last visited Hawaii in August for a week's vacation after he had clinched the

"But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be
not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken
away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand. So thou, O son
of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear
the word at my mouth, and warn them from me. When I say unto the wicked, O wicked
man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that
wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his
way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul." Ezekiel 33:6-9


DNC steps in to silence lawsuit over Obama birth
Democrat suing his own party says it's 'like they're in cahoots'

Posted: October 04, 2008
12:00 am Eastern

By Drew Zahn
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
The man suing Sen. Barack Obama and the
Democratic National Committee for proof of
Obama's American citizenship is outraged that his
own party – rather than just providing the birth
certificate he seeks – would step in to silence him
by filing a motion to dismiss his lawsuit.

As WND reported, prominent Pennsylvania
Democrat and attorney Philip J. Berg filed suit in
U.S. District Court two months ago claiming
Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen and
therefore not eligible to be elected president. Berg
has since challenged Obama publicly that if the
candidate will simply produce authorized proof of
citizenship, he'll drop the suit.

Berg told WND the longer the DNC tries to ignore    Philip J. Berg

his lawsuit or make it go away – instead of just
providing the documents – the more convinced he is that his accusations are correct.

Despite assertions by the Washington Post, and other organizations
that Obama has produced a certified Hawaiian birth certificate, Berg told WND he
remains "99.99 percent sure" that the certificate is a fake and he wants a court, not a
website, to determine its validity.

Earlier last week, lawyers for Obama and the DNC filed a joint motion to dismiss Berg's
lawsuit. The fact that the DNC joined in the dismissal request has Berg fuming,
believing his party's leaders have ignored his pleas for proof in order to favor their
chosen candidate over a rank-and-file constituent.

"I think it's outrageous," Berg said. "The Democratic National Committee should be
ensuring the Democratic Party and the public that they have a qualified candidate up
there. To file a joint motion is like they're in cahoots.

"Since then, I have asked by way of press release that Howard Dean resign, because
(the DNC members) are not fulfilling their duties," Berg said.

"The DNC has a responsibility to all Democrats in this country to make sure that all of
their candidates are properly vetted and properly qualified," Berg added. "I think it's
really an outrage to the 18-plus million people who voted for Obama and the people
who donated more than $425 million to him under false pretenses."
Berg is frustrated, not only with his own party's leadership for allegedly not investigating
Obama's background, but also with the major news outlets for failing as well.

"I should also be suing the national media and their disgrace for not properly vetting,
inspecting or checking on Barack Obama.

"Look what they're doing to Governor Palin: They're opening up her closet doors, they're
going through everything personal, but no one has ever gone after Obama. It doesn't
make sense," Berg said.

Obama's website counters Berg's claims with links to articles that affirm the validity of
his citizenship and an image of a Hawaiian birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama,
born in Honolulu, Aug. 4, 1961. The webpage is part of the Obama campaign website's
"Fight the Smears" section, an effort to prevent reports that Obama claims are false
from disseminating as damaging rumors.

Berg acknowledges that as long as his lawsuit remains outstanding, the public will talk,
and he told WND he wants Obama to quickly prove him wrong or the court to quickly
prove him right.

"I've been on about 50 radio shows around the country," Berg said, "and on every one
I've put out a challenge: Barack Obama, if I'm wrong, just come forth with certified
copies of these documents and I'll close down the case."

Berg told WND, "I've had 19 million hits on my website. …Those people talk to other
people, now we're up to 20, 30, 40 million people who are aware of this controversy,
and it's going to drastically affect the entire election."

When asked what he would do if the DNC succeeded in getting his case dismissed,
Berg said he would "immediately file an appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,
and if we don't get a fair ruling there, immediately to the U.S. Supreme Court."

"We're dealing with the U.S. Constitution and it must be followed," Berg explained. "I
want the Constitution enforced; that's my main reason for doing this.

"The real outrage is that there's nothing in our system that provides that a candidate
must provide that his qualifications are true and correct before he or she runs, and that
safeguard should be put into our system by law," Berg said.

Corrupt Judge dismisses Obama birth certificate
Rules voters don't have standing to 'police' constitutional requirements
for president

Electoral College Links:

   Joseph Stalin "Those Who Cast the Votes Decide Nothing- Those who
                   Count the Votes Decide Everything"


Please see this ad which ran in New Hampshire's Manchester Union Leader newspaper
2 days before the Primary: It was an attempt to get
poll watchers to watch the polls.

GOP Vote Fraud Smoking Gun Banned From CNN,

Bev Harris from Black Box Voting ( See: ) blackballed by ALL
Networks. Her last CNN report after Ms. Harris participated in HBO 's documentary ' Hacking
Democracy ' WATCH FREE NOW AT:

Uncounted - A Documentary About A Voting System
Under Threat watch! — UNCOUNTED is an explosive new documentary that shows how the
election fraud that changed the outcome of the 2004 election led to even greater fraud in 2006 -
and now looms as an unbridled threat to the outcome of the 2008 election. This controversial
feature length film by Emmy award-winning director David Earnhardt...
As the 2008 Elections approach, three new controversial documentary films are advocating an
auditable voting system. They are taking the nation by storm and being screened internationally.
Everyone from The Media Education Foundation to Ron Paul Meetup Groups around the country
and You Tubers are taking action and sharing these documentaries with everyone. ENGAGE
OTHERS in dialog about the 2008 election process.
“The notion of stolen elections is something we assign to Third World countries but not this beacon of freedom and
democracy that we like to view
ourselves as.”
Bernie Ellis, Election integrity activist
  Read more

Exit Poll Discrepancies in 2004
“Nearly all the experts are in agreement that the exit polls could not have been so far off that they gave such distorted
results. It’s far more rational that the voting process was compromised.”
Rep. John Conyers, Chair, House Judiciary Committee
  Read more

Exit Poll Discrepancies in 2004

                                                              Click here for a printable version of this article (PDF)

“Nearly all the experts are in agreement that the exit polls could not have been so far off that they gave such distorted
results. It’s far more rational to assume that the voting process was compromised.”
~ Rep. John Conyers, Chair, House Judiciary Committee

For decades, exit polls have been used in
democracies around the world to predict with a
high degree of accuracy the outcomes of
important elections. Exit polls are much more
precise than pre-election polling in
successfully predicting the outcome of
elections. This is because they are surveying
voters immediately after they have cast their
ballots, rather than asking potential voters
before an election who they might support.

However, the 2004 presidential race had
unprecedented variations between exit poll
results and the “reported” vote in almost all
battleground states, as well as in other, less
contested states. “We’ve relied on the exit
polls for many elections now; they have a
history of at least 40 years,” contends
Jonathan Simon, Co-founder of the Election
Defense Alliance. “In 2004, we saw something very different. The discrepancy between the exit polls and the
‘reported’ vote counts was off the charts. And this was a new phenomenon.”

The 2004 exit poll, commissioned by six major news organizations, showed that John Kerry won the popular vote with
about 51% of the vote. The final tally of the voting machines showed George W. Bush with about 51% of the votes. In
10 out of 11 battleground states, the reported vote results differed significantly from what people told exit poll
interviewers. The differences ranged from 1.6% in Michigan to 9.4% in New Hampshire. In every case, the difference
favored George W. Bush. “Statistics can tell you what the chances are ... that you’d be that far off,” said Dr. Bruce
O’Dell, a data analyst with the Election Defense Alliance. “It’s between astronomically impossible and ludicrously
impossible. So it just didn’t happen by chance.”
Professor Steven Freeman, a statistician at the University of Pennsylvania, did an in-depth study of the 2004 exit
polls. His conclusions are presented in his groundbreaking academic report, “The Unexplained Exit Poll
Discrepancy.” (PDF)

Jonathan Simon of the Election Defense Alliance analyzed the 2004 exit polls and vote count data and concluded
that John Kerry won the 2004 popular vote:

“Jim Crow” Voter Suppression in the 21st Century
“The targeting of people of color is very political and very computerized.”
Harvey Wasserman, Journalist & author
  Read more

“When you see 42%, 70% and 80% undervotes in a precinct in this election, you know that’s not real. There’s
something desperately not right.”
Marybeth Kuznik, Pennsylvania poll worker
 Read more

Electronic Voting
“With all these [electronic] machines, you can alter the outcome of a national election in a way that is just
unprecedented in terms of its reach and the power to really play around.”
Andrew Gumbel, Journalist & author, “Steal This Vote”
 Read more

Privatization of our Election Process
“Voters should not have to rely on any private company for the security and the fundamental fairness of their election
system… The further you go into privatizing this activity of running elections, the more you lose control over the very
core of our democracy.”
  Lowell Finley, Deputy Secretary of State, California
  Read more

Provisional Ballots
“On Election Day, I went to my polling place and was told that my name wasn’t on the register. [But] I voted here in
the primary. And they said ‘Well, you can sign a provisional ballot.’ Come to find out later, I followed up - my vote was
never counted.”
  Bobby Jackson, Ohio resident
  Read more

2006 Mid-Term Election
“Election 2006 gives us no reason to assume that our elections are now being run fairly and honestly. Just the
opposite. Look at the pattern of the last few elections. We have every reason to believe that the 2008 election is
going to be manipulated.”
  Jonathan Simon, Co-founder, Election Defense Alliance
  Read more
Obama spells 'persecution,' warns Focus on the
Analysts see same-sex marriage, Fairness Doctrine on horizon

"Barack Hussein Obama - THE Most Liberal,
Antichristian Presidential Candidate EVER!"
Subtitle: Are the American people so disgusted with "Conservative", "christian", Bush
that they will gladly accept a President far more Liberal than Bill Clinton?

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New
World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see
it progressing in your daily news!!
Do not be deceived on this most critical point: Barack Hussein Obama is one of THE MOST
LIBERAL Presidential candidate EVER! He is far more Liberal on more issues than even
Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis or George McGovern, or even Hubert Humphrey!

As you will soon discover, Obama may be the most Liberal, Antichristian presidential candidate
ever to run on any major ticket! Since the Democrats responded to this charge with disdain and
propaganda of their own, let us look at the specific positions which would prove beyond a
shadow of a doubt that Barack Hussein Obama is truly Liberal, and therefore, truly anathema to
any genuine Conservative / Christian.

NEWS BRIEF: "Who's the 'most liberal' candidate? Here we go again",, March 20,

"Thus, Obama's "lifetime liberal score" of 84.3 means only that, by the National Journal's math,
Obama's Senate voting record makes him more liberal than 84.3 percent of senators. And
Kucinich's "lifetime liberal score" of 79.4 means only that Kucinich is more liberal than 79.4
percent of House members. As the National Journal's Richard Cohen confirmed for us in a
telephone call this morning, you can't do an apples-to-apples comparison of the two."

Since Congressman Dennis Kucinich is consistently considered the most Liberal Congressman
ever, Obama is in a league all by himself when he surpasses Kucinich in being a Liberal!

Let us consider Obama's positions on the issues near and dear to Conservative Christians!

NEWS BRIEF: "Barack Obama Is A Baby-Killing LIAR!", Operation Rescue
* "He has a 100% pro-abortion approval rating from Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW, and
the National Abortion Federation!"

* "He voted against protecting late-term viable babies from Partial Birth Abortion!"

* "He voted against the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act!" This stance is the one which really
angered me! This law mandates that, if a baby dares to be born alive despite the best efforts of
the hospital staff to kill it, then the hospital must use every medical means available to keep that
baby alive.

Barack Hussein Obama certainly shows the wickedness of his inner heart when he opposes the
Born-Alive Infant Protection Act!

* "He wants to make abortion MORE AVAILABLE than it is now!" Some news stories out of
Denver indicate that Obama is going to adopt the false Clinton ideal of "making abortions legal
but rare"! This statement was false when Bill Clinton uttered it a decade ago and it will be even
more false if it becomes an official part of the Obama mantra.

* "He wants YOU to PAY for ALL abortions through your hard-earned tax dollars!"

* "He wants to PROTECT the abominable Roe v. Wade decision at all costs!"

Despite all these facts, "he pretends to be a “moderate” and a “Christian”—and he’s
successfully fooling good people across America into voting for him!"

Cutting Edge could not agree more! If ever there was a candidate where you needed to assume
that the truth is to be found in the opposite direction from the public rhetoric, this is the man! If
Obama ascends to the White House, discerning Christians everywhere are going to have to
assume that the truth is in the opposite direction (Read this propaganda maxim at NEWS1558,

                                            Gun Control

Now, let us turn our attention to Gun Control, an issue near and dear to all Conservative hearts.
How Liberal is Barack Obama on the Second Amendment? The Liberal position is that private
citizens have no Constitutional right to bear arms. Thus, Liberals are always trying to figure out
ways for a government to take away gun ownership and/or to limit the instances in which a
citizen can use his guns.

The National Rifle Association sent out this alert to all its members.

NEWS BRIEF: "Barack Obama's Ten Point Plan To 'Change' The Second Amendment", NRA

"Barack Obama's Ten Point Plan"

1) Ban use of firearms for home self-defense
2) Pass Federal Laws eliminating your 'Right-to-Carry'

3) Ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns

4) Close down 90% of gun shops in America

5) Ban rifle ammunition commonly used for hunting and sport shooting

6) Increase Federal taxes on guns and ammunition by 500%

7) Restore voting rights for five million criminals, including those who have been convicted of
using a gun to commit a violent crime

8) Expand the Clinton semi-auto ban

9) Mandate a government-issued license to purchase a firearm

10) Appoint judges to the U.S. Supreme Court and Federal judiciary who share his views on the
Second Amendment

Do not be deceived. Barack Obama has a foreign advisor named Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is a
Socialist Marxist at heart (Read full details in NEWS2267, "Senator Obama Has Strong Ties To
Illuminati - Communist Illuminati At That!" This reality means that one of the first points on an
Obama agenda is Gun Control. After all, no Marxist wants citizens to actually own weapons. No
absolute dictatorship in world history has wanted its citizens to own weapons; therefore, the first
step a dictatorship takes is to confiscate individually owned guns. Once guns are confiscated,
the dictator strikes quickly.

Americans do not want a pro-gun control President!

What is Obama's position on keeping America militarily strong? You might be surprised!

NEWS BRIEF: "E-mail frenzy: 'Obama plans to disarm U.S.!' Candidate pledges on YouTube
clip to gut military spending, research", By Drew Zahn,
World Net Daily, August 26, 2008

"DES MOINES, Iowa – A video the Barack Obama campaign produced last year to solicit the
endorsement of an Iowa-based advocacy group has generated more than 3 million page views
on YouTube, fueled by chain e-mails claiming the clip is evidence the presumptive Democratic
presidential nominee intends to disarm the U.S. ... The video, however, was originally posted on
YouTube by the Obama campaign itself on Oct. 22, 2007, and has been seen – in its various
repeat appearances on the site – well over 3 million times."

Before you scoff at this seemingly radical concept, take a few moments to consider what
Obama actually says on this video tape.

1) "Obama pledges to "cut tens of billions of dollars" in defense spending..."

2) "... cut investments in missile defense systems..."
3) "slow our development of future combat systems."

Remember that Obama's Foreign Policy adviser is Zbigniew Brzezinski, who advised President
Jimmy Carter during his four years (1976-1980). One of
Carter's major point of emphasis was to gut the Defense Appropriations for his four years. The
result was an Air Force which could not sustain a heavy flying schedule, a Navy which was
moribund, and an Army ill-equipped to fight sustained battles anywhere. A common thread
running throughout all the Armed Forces branches was that spending for spare parts was so
inadequate that the vast majority of military units were not up to combat status in preparedness.

During the 1980 campaign, Ronald Reagan made this disaster an integral part of his campaign,
and drew the fervent support of millions of concerned Conservative voters. As President,
Reagan lived up to his promise to completely restore the Armed Forces to combat readiness.
However, what Americans did not realize until the First Gulf War, 1991, was that Reagan had
built a brand new Armed Forces heavily armed with Depleted Uranium Munitions -- all branches
received this new D.U. weaponry! The new Armed Forces did not have to wait long to test their
new weaponry, because Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in August, 1990, and the American
military response began in January, 1991. The Pentagon never likes to wait too long after
receiving a major new weapons system to try it out.

In hindsight, Reagan could not have built his brand spanking new Depleted Uranium forces if
Jimmy Carter had not depleted the existing American Armed Forces so completely. Because
both Carter and Reagan are equally committed to the New World Order, and really are following
the same script, you have to realize that Carter's severe drawdown of American forces was
required by the Illuminati script so that Reagan could act like a hero in creating the new Armed

How else can Barack Obama be considered Liberal?

NEWS BRIEF: "Obama-Biden "most liberal ticket EVER", by Missouri Senator Kit Bond, Prime
Buzz News, Kansas City Star, August 28, 2008

"Missouri Sen. Kit Bond told reporters in a telephone conference call today two things of note:

1) Obama-Biden is the most liberal ticket in American history. His exact words: "By choosing
Joe Biden, Barack Obama has solidified the title as the most liberal ticket ever to be put forward
by the Democratic Party."

Obama, he said, has been rated by the National Journal as the most liberal senator and Biden
the third-most liberal.

Their liberal credentials will shine most brightly when it comes to taxes, the four-term GOP
senator said. Their approach will hurt small businesses and cost some workers their jobs as
their employers struggle to pay the higher tax load.

"The tax and spend policies that Senator Obama and Senator Biden have supported in the past
would significantly cripple our economy and bring about a change back to the Euro-socialism of
the '60s and '70s that produced nothing but stagnation, not growth and opportunity.”
2) The Biden selection will have almost zero impact on McCain's thinking about who his veep
should be, Bond said. In fact, he called the pick of Biden a "non-factor" in McCain's choice.

"I don't think Joe Biden presents any challenges that Senator McCain can't meet by himself."

If Senator Obama ascends to the White House, he will be far more Liberal and to the Left than
Bill and Hillary Clinton were from 1992-2000. Do you remember the policies which vexed
Conservatives during the Clinton years?

1) Hillary's "Cradle to Grave" National Health Plan -- while Conservatives possessed the political
clout to force President Bill Clinton to abandon Hillary's Socialist health program, Obama will
have the political clout on his side this time, especially if he moved to establish this system
within the first 100 days.

2) Bill Clinton said that he wanted abortion to be "rare but safe". You can expect similar rhetoric
from a President Obama, with the same dreary results -- abortion will continue to plague this

3) Bill Clinton kept his veto pen busy against Congressional bills which would outlaw Partial
Birth Abortion. Not only is Obama completely supportive of Abortion Upon Demand during all
nine months of pregnancy, he opposes the Alive Infant Act which mandates hospitals to employ
every resource at their disposal to safe a baby who is born alive during an abortion procedure!

Liberals also traditionally favor large tax burdens for the "rich" and closing investment loopholes
so that additional monies can be spent on social programs. However, the irony of history is that
"Conservative Republicans" have pursued Liberal policies! Do you remember Ronald Reagan?
He issued rhetorical broadside after rhetorical broadside against the evils of Abortion, against
huge government growth, and against budget deficits. These positions are standard
Conservative ideals, and upon these ideals, Reagan won two terms as President.

So, what does Reagan actually do in eight years? He never actually took against Abortion; he
presided over huge growth in both government bureaucracy and in budget deficits. Indeed, the
deficits became known as the "Reagan Deficits" by the time his eight years had come to an end.

How does "Conservative Christian" President Bush stack up against the Conservative ideals?
He lied as to why we needed to attack Iraq, he presided over huge growth in deficits and his
policies on the Gay-Lesbian agenda are identical to Bill Clinton (Read full details in NEWS1652,
"Concerned Women of America (CWA) Raises The Alarm On President Bush: His Policies Are
Identical To Clinton's Regarding The Gay and Lesbian Agenda!"

Therefore, Conservative American voters have been thoroughly deceived by the very
"Conservative" Republican leaders they have voted into office. Yet, we still hear that we need to
elect this so-called Conservative because we want Conservative judges and Conservative
ideals being followed. This propaganda ploy that we need to elect Conservative Republicans in
order to get Conservative judges is a huge lie. Did you know that Republican judges provided
the majority to legalize Sodomy and Abortion in Roe vs Wade? Did you know that Terri Schiavo
was killed by Republican Judges? Please take a few moments to read the truth about
Republican/Conservative Judges in NEWS2031, "Help President Bush Get His Judicial
Nominees Through Congress: Propaganda Lie"!
I hope everyone within reach of this ministry completely understands that
Conservative/Republican voters have been thoroughly deceived and betrayed by the
"Conservative" politicians we have consistently voted into office since World War I.

But, Senator Obama is one of those Liberals who are completely unabashed about his position.
If elected President, Obama will pursue a Liberal agenda which will be a combination of the
Liberal Franklin Roosevelt and William Clinton!

He will be the most Liberal President in American history.

He likely will also be the final catalyst of the destruction of this Old Order so the New World
Order can be built on its ashes. Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately
protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand
the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones.
Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open
the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have
seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we
can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

In a strong signal that Senator Obama is the Illuminati choice for President, Former Secretary of
State and Retired General Colin Powell abruptly endorsed him for the Oval Office!

NEWS BRIEF: "Former Bush Secretary of State Powell backs Obama", Reuter's News, October
20, 2008

"Retired U.S. Gen. Colin Powell, a former secretary of state in the Bush administration, on
Sunday endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama. In an appearance on NBC's
'Meet the Press', Powell backed Obama over fellow Republican John McCain, calling the
Democratic nominee a 'transformational figure' who could be an 'exceptional president'."

The words, 'transformational figure', are New Age Messianic terms! As we have pointed out on
numerous occasions, Senator Obama has been running a Presidential campaign using
Messianic slogans, symbols, and words for the past 18 months. His campaign has created and
run a website devoted to promoting Obama as a Messiah figure. Increasing numbers of people
are coming to believe that he might be a Messiah, including a number of Christians who believe
that he might turn out to be THE Biblical Antichrist.

If you have not yet read our most recent treatise on whether Obama could be the Biblical
Messiah, please read NEWS2320, "Is Obama The Coming Antichrist?"

If you have read this article prior to 9am this morning, please read it again, for we added one
important reason Obama cannot be Antichrist to the list.

Now, let us return to the news story, above, about Colin Powell suddenly announcing his
support for the Obama candidacy. Is Powell looking for a job within an Obama Administration?
"Powell, who served in the military and government for 40 years, said he is not looking for a job
in an Obama administration. However, he said, 'I've always said if a president asks you to do
something, you have to consider it' ... Powell praised Obama's "depth of knowledge" and
"steadiness," while he was critical of what he described as McCain's uncertainty over how to
deal with economic crisis."

John McCain attempted to defend himself against this monstrous blow.

"McCain, appearing on 'Fox News Sunday', said Powell's support of Obama did not come as a
surprise and said four other secretaries of state had endorsed him."

Perhaps, but Colin Powell has always been a real heavyweight Illuminati insider. From August
28-September 10, 2000, when the Illuminati was holding its three global conferences designed
to officially and spiritually "birth" the New World Order into existence, Colin Powell was the head
of all three summits (Read NEWS1395, "THREE GLOBAL MEETINGS TO PRODUCE

Therefore, Powell is a supremely powerful Illuminati insider and "mover and shaker". When he
speaks, the entire occult world listens; and, he just spoke out loudly and clearly in support of
Senator Obama.

An Islamic head of state has just "outed" Senator Obama as being a Muslim!

NEWS BRIEF: "Libyan Leader Muammar Gadhafi Reveals: Obama a Muslim who studied in
Islamic schools", World Net Daily, October 17, 2008

"Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim of Kenyan origins who studied in Islamic schools and whose
campaign may have been financed by people in the Islamic and African worlds, Libyan leader
Muammar Gadhafi said during a recent televised national rally."

" 'There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a
Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama', said Gadhafi in
little-noticed remarks he made at a rally marking the anniversary of the 1986 U.S. air raid on his

Make no mistake about it -- Senator Obama is a Muslim in his inner heart of hearts, and it does
look as though the Illuminati is planning on elevating him to the highest office in the land. What
a supreme irony! After President Bush (Skull & Bones) pursues his "war on terror" and his
invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq for seven long years, the Illuminati causes a Muslim to
ascend to the Presidency.

Will we see "payback" from a President Obama?

Christian ministries might have a lot to fear from a President Obama!k
Signs continue to mount that Senator Obama will be the 44th President of the United States!

NEWS BRIEF: "Obama takes 10-point lead on McCain", Reuter's News, October 22, 2008

"Democrat Barack Obama has expanded his national lead over Republican John McCain in the
presidential race to 10 points, according to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll released on
Wednesday. Obama leads McCain 52 percent to 42 percent among likely U.S. voters in the
latest three-day tracking poll, up from an 8-point advantage for Obama on Tuesday."

"It was the third consecutive day Obama gained ground on McCain as the two begin the final
sprint to the November 4 election. 'Obama just keeps growing, he has expanded his lead
among almost every major voting group', said pollster John Zogby. 'McCain seems to be out of
steam for the moment'."

Indeed, McCain seems to be following the plan for deliberate defeat which Senator Bob Dole
followed in 1996 in his race against President Bill Clinton. McCain's campaign seems dull and
lifeless; only Governor Palin is providing any spark!

"Obama made gains with two key swing voting blocs. His advantage with independent voters
grew to a whopping 27 points from 15 points and his edge with women voters grew to 16 points
from 13. Obama, an Illinois senator, led among all age groups and in every income group
except for the most wealthy voters. He now has the support of 21 percent of self-described
conservatives -- his best showing with those voters."

Since we know that the election is predetermined, all the polls show is what the political pundits
want us citizens to believe. Polls are manufactured to help spin the story which the
propagandists have drawn up. Remember, the skill of the propagandist lies in his ability to make
scripted events appear to unfold naturally, chaotically, and accidentally.

Both the Obama and the McCain camps have hinted that a terrible crisis will erupt within the first
six months of the 44th President's term!

NEWS BRIEF: "Biden: Obama Will be 'Tested' by World in First 6 Months of Administration",
Fox News, October 20, 2008

"Opening an avenue for the McCain campaign to push its candidate's strengths, Joe Biden says
an Obama administration would face an international challenge in its first six months ... 'Mark
my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John
Kennedy. The world is looking', Biden said.

" 'Remember I said it standing here. if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're
gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy. And he's
gonna have to make some really tough -- I don't know what the decision's gonna be, but I
promise you it will occur'."
I can also guarantee that, if a "generated crisis" will occur, it will be generated by the Illuminati
because that is their plan. If the Illuminati does not plan for a crisis this early in the new
President's term, then this statement by Senator Biden will be just another "Rumors of War".

Not to be outdone, Senator McCain also hinted at a major crisis early in the next Administration.

NEWS BRIEF: "McCain raises specter of nuclear war", AFP News, October 21, 2008

" John McCain raised the specter of nuclear war as he struggled to overcome rival Barack
Obama's widening lead in the polls with just 14 days left in the epic race to the White House.
Warning voters that the United States faces 'many challenges here at home, and many enemies
abroad in this dangerous world', McCain returned to the attack line that Obama has poor
judgment and is not ready to lead the United States."

"The next president 'won't have time to get used to the office', the Republican said at a rally on

The idea that Obama is untested is one that has resonated strongly throughout this entire
Presidential campaign, and if the election results were not fixed, American voters by the tens of
millions would vote against him for this reason alone. But, of course, the election is fixed and the
Illuminati will get their man into the Oval Office.

We believe that this public rhetoric is just "Rumors of Wars", for the following reasons:

1) The Bible speaks of cooperation amongst the final ten kings of the earth at the End of the

"For God has put it into their hearts to carry out His own purpose by acting in harmony in
surrendering their royal power and authority to the beast, until the prophetic words (intentions
and promises) of God shall be fulfilled." (Revelation 17:17; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible

This is one of THE most important Scriptures foretelling that the Kingdom of Antichrist will be
established by a global conspiracy! God has acted through His sovereign Will to place the plan
into the hearts of the final ten kings to cooperate -- act in harmony -- to carry out a course of
action which will fulfill all God's prophecies! God is glorified when His 2,600-year-old prophecies
are finally carried out to the letter!

Colin Powell even mentioned January 21 or 22, 2009, as possible dates of a major crisis, in the
remarks he made when he supported Obama for President.

Since the plan to establish the final ten kings of the earth is well known now -- NEWS1002 --
and is a plot created by the worldwide Illuminati beginning in 1773, we know that we can look to
the Illuminati Plan to see if they plan a massive crisis in the first six months of the administration
of the 44th President!

But, first, let us examine a famous quote from one of the authors of the Global Elite, to hear
from their own lips the existence of the kind of Global Conspiracy which Revelation 17:17
"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions ... Down in
the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up ... Most of the actors ... have already
taken up their roles. Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to
arise. The time for action will have come." [Peter Lemesurier, "The Armageddon Script", P. 252]

What is the plan of the Illuminati to produce Antichrist, and are there any hints as to the timing of
the next big crisis?

In full accord with Matthew 24:6-8, the Illuminati plans to stage their Antichrist through a World
War III, and this war will be comprised of the following elements:

1. Middle East -- Islamic nations surrounding Israel are designed to be the trigger to start a
Middle East conflagration, but Israel will be the major combatant. United States' forces could
well be attacked wherever they are stationed in the Middle East.

2. Korean Peninsula -- "A hair-raising nuclear confrontation in Korea, may, towards the end of
the period, threatens mankind's very survival." ["Armageddon Script", P. 223]. After U.S. forces
are fully involved in the Middle East, giving and taking fire, North Korea is to pour over the DMZ
using Weapons of Mass Destruction. Since the United States is committed by treaty to quickly
reinforce with 690,000 troops, we will immediately begin to rush military forces to the Korean
Peninsula. At that moment, North Korea will threaten to use nuclear missiles against our cities.
Since Americans believe we cannot stop even one missile -- that we are totally open to missile
attack -- we will feel that, at any moment, North Koreans nukes may start exploding in our cities.
China may intervene diplomatically on behalf of North Korea, threatening us with nuclear attack,
thus adding to the fear and making the entire episode a "hair-raising nuclear confrontation".

If people would only understand that American have a missile defense in HAARP that will totally
keep missiles away from the North American continent, they would not fall for this part of the
script. While we are speaking of HAARP capabilities, we need to ask a question: since this
capability is totally dependent upon that huge array of HAARP antennas in Alaska, how
susceptible is this array to enemy commando troops raiding it to take it out? If HAARP is
disabled, then any missile can come in, and we have ourselves a true emergency.

3. Taiwan -- After the U.S. is thoroughly engaged in both the Middle East and on the Korean
Peninsula, China is to invade Taiwan, taking her back. In June, 1999, I was invited to attend the
U.S. Naval War College's Annual Strategy Conference at Newport, Rhode Island. My verbatim
notes from this most important conference are in the Cutting Edge "Directory of All Articles",
NEWS1292 through NEWS1304.

All along the time frame in which it takes to unfold these three wars, terrorist attacks are
planned in major cities of all the developed nations in which the citizenry is still electing their
leaders. Current leaders in all these nations will use the terrorist attacks as the excuse to
dissolve the current government and impose Martial Law. These terror attacks will occur only
after World War III has begun.

Therefore, there is no question but that a next wave of terror attacks is planned. The only
question is the timing. To answer that question, we have to understand one more detail: the
short duration of this planned World War III. Since the Illuminati will plan their events around
their sacred numbers, World War III is planned to be 13 weeks long (13 is the number denoting
extreme rebellion against constituted authority).

Former Satanist, Doc Marquis, adamantly told me on a number of occasions that this 91-day
war will be the deadliest in history, because the Illuminati is going to use a wide variety of
Weapons of Mass Destruction -- Nuclear, chemical, biological.

Furthermore, not one of the planned parts of World War III will occur before the war actually
starts. Therefore, we must look at the progression which the war between Israel and her Arab
neighbors is taking. The event which shall serve as the final warning signal that this war is about
to begin is the establishment of the Palestinian State (Read full details in NEWS2095)

If this Palestinian State is declared to be a reality within the first six months of the next
Presidency, then Biden's timetable has a shot at being fulfilled. However, if this state is not
declared within that time frame, there is no chance at all that the next terror attack will occur
within the 6-month time frame.

What kind of crisis could possibly erupt so quickly in the term of the next President?

A terror attack seems to be the event at which both campaign camps seem to be pointing us.

This first story is most certainly a CIA plant, given the location of the "discovery", plus the fact
that this story uses bin Laden as the source,a man who is probably dead now! But, it is
important many times to know what the propagandist wants us to believe.

NEWS BRIEF: "Bin Laden's plan for 'global fireball' ", World Net Daily, October 20, 2008

"LONDON -- Documents recovered from a remote area along the Pakistan border have
revealed that Osama bin Laden wants al-Qaida to launch a 'global fireball' by lighting forest fires
in Europe, the United States, Australia and South America ... The documents, uncovered during
an operation led by the British intelligence service MI6, have been described by experts in that
agency as 'the most worrying [plot] that the world is facing'."

While this supposed document correctly identifies the wide area planned for the next terror
attack -- the United States, Australia and South America -- its origins are suspicious. In the past,
when the CIA or some other Western intelligence service created a bogus news story, they
reported that it was found either in a captured laptop computer or in a remote area in
Afghanistan or some other Middle Eastern country into which President Bush has extended his
"war on terror".

This story reports that the documents were discovered in " a remote area along the Pakistan
border". This location is very typical of a planted intelligence document.

Even the Homeland Security Chief got in on the act!

NEWS BRIEF: "Change in U.S. President May Spur Terror Plot: Homeland Secretary Chertoff
Warns", By Jeff Bliss, Bloomberg Financial News, October 22, 2008
"Terrorists may see the change to a new U.S. president over the next six months as a prime
chance to attack, no matter who wins the White House, Homeland Security Secretary Michael
Chertoff said. 'Any period of transition creates a greater vulnerability, meaning there's more
likelihood of distraction', Chertoff said in an interview yesterday. 'You have to be concerned it
will create an operational opportunity for terrorists'.''

I find it highly interesting that Chertoff mentioned the six month timeframe also!

It is possible that the next terror attack will occur within the first six months of the next President,
but only if World War III has begun! We must keep our eyes on Israel and the speed with which
she is moving into the scripted World War III.


warning from buzz..... They are removing all Obama articles......MINE ARE ALL GONE... HOW ABOUT

Things are being shut down to truth already......Utube said no more of those videos ..that are telling the
truth about Obama......, etc....Obama is getting with officials to stop things so voter fraud will not be
We need to be on our knees in prayer. Our way of life that we take for granted, freedom etc. could be
gone over night. martial law can be stop our comings and goings......

Larry Sinclair/Barack Obama

The Story Barack Obama and the Media Do Not Want You To Know

Stats by StatCounter

About Me
Larry Sinclair

        I have been attacked, falsely arrested and falsely charged all in an effort to hide the TRUTH
        about Barack Obama's crack cocaine use in 1999, his extra-marital affairs with me and other gay
        men, his long term intimate and sexual relationship with the MURDERED Donald Young, former
        choir director of Obama's church TUCC in Chicago. The Obama thugs have had my web sites
        shut down by startlogic one day before the DNC Convention, and they have admitted and
        bragged of being responsible for distributing my Social Security number to individuals who are
        using it illegally. On October 10 & 11, 2008 Obama supporters/surrogates did hack into two
        Hotmail accounts, one AOL account, this Blog and my original Youtube account and deleted
        every video, article, email, and file from all of them. Wake up America as these same Obots as
        recently as yesterday had the nerve to say that on November 5, 2008 I, the PUMA's, Clinton
        supporters and others who opposed Barack Obama will see what going against Obama will bring
        us. They have even stated that people opposing Obama will be arrested, sued, fired and beaten!
        And this was just posted October 20, 2008!

View my complete profile

Friday, October 24, 2008

From: "WHBC" <>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:43:41 -0500
Subject: A Letter to Pastors

October 24, 2008

Dear Preachers:

Over 11,000 of you will receive this e-mail, if these lists all work as they should, which sometimes they do

From the Middle East, last night, I picked up this news item:

From Iran, there was an underlying message for Barack Obama that if elected, he would be expected to
acknowledge the Islamic republic's standing as a regional power. (And, as sure as my name is Vineyard, I
fully expect The Mohammedan, if elected as our President, to acknowledge any and everything the other
Mohammedans want him to!!!!)

Yedidim of Israel is a collaboration of over 7,600 independent Baptist churches in America.

Iran then claims: "We will have captured the White House as well!"

Larijani was not the first Iranian leader to endorse the Democratic senator.

That comes out of a story headlined: How about a Dry Run for a Floating Dirty Bomb?

American and Israeli intelligence experts attach little credence to Tehran's assertions that Iran will not
strike first against Israel but only retaliate "painfully and destructively" for an Israeli attack on its nuclear

Indeed, according to Middle East military sources, strategists in Washington and Jerusalem warn Israel to
brace itself for a pre-emptive Iranian attack in 2009, by which time the Islamic republic is expected to
have built one or more nuclear bombs.

The sources have gone so far as to examine a list of potential delivery vehicles, ranging from ballistic
missiles and nuclear-armed bombers to a commercial jet or cargo vessel - or even a submarine striking
from mid-sea opposite Israel's Mediterranean coastal cities.

Israel's misgivings were strengthened by a confidential briefing given in London two weeks ago by Seyed
Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - and leaked to the
media this week.
He disclosed that senior officials in Tehran recommend a pre-emptive strike to forestall an Israeli attack
on Iran's nuclear installations.

Israeli officials have treated the leak as deliberately aimed at putting Jerusalem on notice that an Iranian
war initiative was in the offing unless Israel followed Washington's example and took its military option off
the table.

Tehran may play safe with unconventional means of war

Middle East military sources report that Iranian planning appears to have gone as far as ruling out military
measures in favor of unconventional weapons that would save the Iranian war machine from being struck
down by superior Israeli military capabilities, such as its ability to shoot down ballistic missiles before they
penetrate Israeli airspace – particularly since the US FBX-T radar was installed in the Negev last month.

They also accept that intruding Iranian bombers would be no match for Israeli Air force warplanes'
superior speed, technology, equipment, and armaments.

So instead of frittering away its meager missile and air force resources, Tehran will probably bank on the
element of surprise, according to US and Israeli intelligence analysts. They have found signs that one
option considered by Iranian war planners is to load a bomb or nuclear device aboard a regular
commercial flight from Tehran to Rome, Paris, or Zurich. It would be dropped over the Mediterranean and
detonated under water. Israeli experts calculate the blast would trigger a sea surge that would swamp
large sections of greater Tel Aviv and neighboring coastal towns with polluted flood water.

A similar effect might be achieved by detonating a cargo vessel with a nuclear device in its hold opposite
Tel Aviv. The ship would reach the Mediterranean through the Suez Canal.

In either case, the loss of life would be colossal, estimated at between 100,000 and a million fatalities, at
no military cost to Iran, although Israel's neighbors might also pay a price.

US, Israel invest in early spotting of radiation emissions!

America and Israel are therefore investing heavily in a crash program to develop long-range tracking
facilities for early warning of radiation emissions from air or sea craft in motion in the air or on the waters
of the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, and Mediterranean.

Middle East Sources report that this effort was redoubled after the bizarre episode of the Iranian freighter
MV Iran Deyant.

The ship was hijacked on August 21 and released by an Iranian delegation, which secretly landed in
Somalia two weeks ago and ransomed the vessel for a huge sum.

The Somali pirates who hijacked the MV Iran Deyant as it passed the Horn of Africa en route for the Suez
Canal little dreamed that many of them would find their tomb in the 44,458 weight bulk freighter.

The gang of 40 pirates, armed to the teeth with Kalashnikov automatic rifles and RPGs, seized the vessel
by their standard MO of blocking its path with speedboats and swarming aboard.

The captain put up no resistance. After dropping anchor at Eyl, a fishing village in northeastern Somalia,
the hijackers ransacked the ship to examine their prize. They discovered that the MV Iran Deyant
belonged to the state-owned Iranian Shipping Lines, which ferries cargoes past UN proliferation
regulations with the help of fake shipping documents that hide the cargo's end-users and its nature.
The story further states that the pirates succumbed to radiation from Iranian cargo!

The hold held seven locked containers. When the crew denied having codes to open them, the hijackers
smashed one and found it held packets of a substance that looked like "powdery fine sandy soil."

Three days later, the hijackers who had touched the opened packet developed serious skin burns and
loss of hair. Two weeks later, 16 were dead.

The cause of their symptoms was efficiently spirited away by the Iranian delegation.

But their description was enough for WMD experts to hypothesize that the vessel was an enormous
"floating dirty bomb."

It was heading for the Mediterranean and may have been rigged to detonate in proximity to Israel's
coastal cities after the crew had abandoned ship and taken to life boats.

An easterly wind would have driven the deadly radioactive cloud thrown up by the explosion ashore.

Chemical experts have judged the description of the pirates' symptoms as consistent with exposure to

The high exposure won by the seizure of the Ukrainian weapons vessel MV Fiana by Somali pirates
obscured the episode of the Iranian nuclear ship; it aroused no comment, even in Israel.

Israeli military sources consulted were cautious: They found some exaggeration in the way the Iranian
ship's cargo and the pirates' symptoms were described and diagnosed.

However, most reliable informants have stated that experts in Washington and Jerusalem do not rule out
the possibility that the MV Iran Deyant was conducting a dry run for a possible attack on Israel.

Nothing would have come out had the ship not run foul of pirates!

After careful calculation, Tehran intervened publicly in the US Presidential race Wednesday, October 22,
thirteen days before polling.

Iran's speaker of parliament, Ali Larijani, a powerful conservative voice, went on record as stating that
Tehran would prefer the Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama in the White House next year.
[And all the other Mohammedans in all other Sharia countries would greatly prefer THE MOHAMMEDAN
as our president, instead of our former POW.]

"We lean more in his favor because he is more flexible and rational," said the Iranian official, "even
though we know American policy will not change that much."

Talking to the press during a visit to Manama, Bahrain, Larijani added: "This risk [of a US attack on Iran]
was low before. But now I am 100 percent certain that the United States will not unleash a war against
Iran. The economic crisis has cost the United States 1,400 billion dollars and Washington is working to
resolve its internal problems and not a war."

The article states that Iranian sources confirm that the Iranian parliamentarian would not have publicly
endorsed the Democratic candidate without the highest possible authority from Tehran.
The former nuclear negotiator, seasoned in talks with Western diplomats, quite deliberately chose the
venue for his statement. Bahrain is one of America's closest allies in the Persian Gulf region and location
of US Fifth Fleet headquarters.

The underlying message for Barack Obama was that if elected, he would be expected to acknowledge
the Islamic republic's standing as a regional power.

"We will have captured the White House as well!"

Larijani was not the first Iranian leader to endorse the Democratic senator.

Last May, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that Obama's election as president would be "a positive
development for Tehran." He added that he did not believe the senator would be allowed to win.

A senior cleric close to the Iranian president followed his remarks by saying: "If Obama is elected and the
talks with Ahmadinejad come about, then we will have captured the White House as well."

Since then, Iran's rulers have assiduously followed the campaigns of the two candidates, Obama and his
Republican rival Senator John McCain, carefully assessing their chances.

Wednesday, they placed their bet.

For Tehran, Obama's main appeal lies in his acclaimed readiness to talk to Iran's leaders.

Although the Democratic candidate qualified this by saying, "Interlocutors should set a date to stop
bidding unless Iran clarifies that there are conditions under which it would suspend uranium enrichment."

On May 23, 2008, DNW 250 offered "A Projected Scenario for [Obama's] Engagement with Ahmadinejad:

Long experience has taught Middle East Iran experts that Tehran's Islamist rulers are no ping-pong

They have a built-in penchant for procrastination and interminable bargaining.

They relish every twist and turn that gives them points against their opposite numbers and, above all,
staves off a clear-cut outcome.

For the Iranians, diplomacy is a happy occasion for bazaar-style haggling, rather than a tool for solving
problems and reaching understandings.

More than once, European diplomats have tried their hand at direct engagement with Iran on its nuclear
program; after each round, they raised their hands in defeat.

They found themselves caught up in round after round of aimless palaver, while the Iranians took
advantage of the idle talk to pursue the very nuclear, strategic, and military goals which the talks were
meant to abort.

No Americans need apply, only the president!

For now, Tehran is excluding any American interlocutors except for the next president - preferably Barack
Until then, the Iranians are blocking all gestures of friendship from American sources and efforts to thaw
the contentiousness governing relations.

Earlier this year, President George W. Bush's Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, offered to set up a
quasi-diplomatic presence in Tehran. She was snubbed.

On October 4, the American Iranian Council (AIC) announced it had been granted US government
permission to open an office in Tehran as the only US-based non-government organization focusing on
peace and security issues to operate in Iran.

Its purpose would be to promote governmental, NGO and person-to-person contacts between the US and

This week former Democratic Senator (D-Louisiana) Bennet Johnston, current head of a Washington
publications relations company, appealed to his former colleagues for donations of $50 each to help the
AIC get started.

But on October 21, the project was killed before it was born by Tehran:

Interior Minister Ali Kordan, made this contemptuous statement to reporters: "The Interior Ministry will
never issue permission for the American Iranian Council office to open in Tehran. It is the ministry which
should make decisions on any request by countries. But no request has been submitted to the ministry to

This announcement took the AIC and its backers in Washington by surprise.

They view themselves as an informal pro-Iranian lobby in the US capital.

They campaigned hard against the Bush Administration's advocacy of penalties and sanctions for Iran's
refusal to given up uranium enrichment and fought against any thought of a US military strike against the
Islamic republic's nuclear reactors.

Now, the American Iranian Council finds itself shut out of Tehran and told in effect, like all Americans,
however sympathetic: Don't call us, we'll call you.

And Preachers, you and I have all day today, Friday, plus seven more days in October, and then three
days in November to do what we are going to do in an effort to effect this election.

If The Mohammedan gets elected President of the USA, then, in addition to the statement above,

"We will have captured the White House as well," you and I have to worry about the following:

1. Supreme Court Appointments

They will all be Pro-Abortion;

They will all be anti 2nd Amendment;

They will all be against our "Freedom of Speech," running so hard against it, that sooner rather than later,
we will be facing THOUGHT POLICE in America.
2. The Mohammedan will be cowed by the tough times financially, either he, or McCain will face, and will
turn more and more to His Socialist Ideas.

3. The Mohammedan will become easy prey for all the rest of the Mohammedans as the Iranians




Subject: Read Obama' s books

This has been circulating, but it needs to continue, because this man B. Hussein Obama is a dangerous
threat to the world, not just our country. Just like Hitler, his own words condemn him. His great oratory is
empty and his real motivation is found in his books.

From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began
to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'

From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity
against my mother's race.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of
himself, maybe. And white.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty
to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my
own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought
in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'

And FINALLY the Most Damning one of ALL of them!!!

From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'

Would you still vote for this man? If so, you are racist, you are Muslim, your god is mammon, or all the
The primary reason is you have no "fear or love of God"!
'Gay' pedophilia and Obama
October 20, 2008 By Linda Harvey

I'd been wondering what Kevin Jennings was doing these days. Jennings is the founder and long-time head of the radical homosexual group
GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. GLSEN's mission has been to plant "gay" clubs and training programs in as
many schools as possible. GLSEN now claims 4,000 "gay-straight alliances" exist, although this number is doubtful.

Certainly, there are way too many. The group's target has been to place these clubs in all U.S. schools, K through 12. If you think a
kindergartener signing up for a "gay" club is ludicrous, you are not alone.

But Jennings has moved on to better things. He's now the Obama campaign fundraising co-chair for the "LGBT" community – that's "lesbian,
gay, bisexual and transgendered." You can listen to Jennings lay out the rights-oriented rhetoric in two interviews with Joe Solmonese of the
Human Rights Campaign, on the website "LGBT for Obama."

Their conversation, reviewing Jennings' record, dwells on preventing bullying of "gay" kids. Jennings constructed this Trojan horse for access
to schools despite the ability of every community to punish school bullying without accommodating the "gay" agenda. This smokescreen
hides the pornographic reality of GLSEN's "support" for kids under Jennings' leadership.

Remember the book "Queering Elementary Education," with the gushing blurb on the back from Obama's radical "social justice" colleague
Bill Ayers? Well, the same book has a foreword written by Jennings. In researching GLSEN over the years, I've found horrific elements of
what can only be called child sexual corruption. The more closely one reads the GLSEN material, the worse it gets.

Just about every type of sexual practice imaginable is apparently acceptable and even worthy of "celebration" by any age student or teacher
as far as GLSEN is concerned. GLSEN also supports gender-distortion through cross-dressing, even for elementary school children.

Is this the kind of "school reform" Obama has in mind?

Some of GLSEN's recommended reading material implicitly condones criminal sexual contact between adults with minors. Many such
incidents are described in erotic and nostalgic passages. I've yet to see "warnings" about the episodes in these books, which surely mislead
thousands of vulnerable kids. I wrote in detail about what I will share below in 2002, yet the books in question, and many more just as
objectionable, are still offered by GLSEN for sale on its site.

The problem starts with Jennings' own writings in books like "One Teacher In 10." Jennings' dream world is one where openly "gay" teachers
serve as role models who influence students' sexual conduct. In the first edition of this book, Jennings, a former teacher, relates his
encounter with a homosexually inclined male student:

Toward the end of my first year, during the spring of 1988, Brewster appeared in my office in the tow of one of my advisees ... to whom I had
been "out" for a long time. "Brewster has something he needs to talk with you about," she intoned ominously. ... On a hunch, I suddenly
asked, "What's his name?" Brewster's eyes widened briefly, and then out spilled a story about his involvement with an   older man        he
had met in Boston. I listened, sympathized, offered advice. He left my office with a smile on his face. ... ("One Teacher in 10: Gay and
Lesbian Educators tell their Stories," Alyson Publications, 1994.)

What did Jennings recommend to Brewster that brought a smile to his face? It sounds like he affirmed this teen/adult homosexual
relationship, instead of contacting the boy's parents or the authorities. Is this just the kind of wisdom we hope Obama consultants use
in formulating education policy? Child predators as implementers of "social justice," perhaps?

The book "Growing Up Gay/Growing Up Lesbian," recommended on the GLSEN website for kids in grades seven to 12, describes two 10-
year-old boys in a very graphic sexual encounter (pp.99-100). In the same book, an adult man named Eliot reflects on his youth:

My first experience was with a much older man, a   friend of Derek's [his father]. ... When I was 15, he must have been 29, 30 ... I seduced
him. ... It was a wild night. We did everything.

This is the dearest fantasy of pedophiles and pederasts – the pretense that the youth   seduces them.
Another GLSEN recommended book, "Rainbow Boys," features an episode of homosexual sex between one of the main characters, a 17-
year-old boy, and a 29-year-old man he has just met via the Internet ( p. 148). Again, a great influence for kids.
Fluid sexual activity and homosexual experimentation is another common theme in GLSEN-recommended books. "My sexuality is as fluid,
infinite, undefinable, and ever-changing as the north-flowing river. ... Sexuality is not black or white ... it is gray. ... I know that defining myself
is not so simple. ..." writes a 16-year-old in "Revolutionary Voices : A Multicultural Queer Youth Anthology" (p.167).

Another girl writes in the same book: "I am a 15-year-old dyke artist and activist. I've got flaming pink hair and a     passion for genderf–k in
both directions" (p. 28).

I could go on and on, unfortunately. The GLSEN "Book Link" introduction states that the selections are recommended to "... empower our
mission to ensure safe schools for all LGBT students."

So finally, then, this is what is meant by "safe schools": lots of weird, early sex by kids, some of it with adults.

Obama needs to remove Kevin Jennings immediately from this position. And voters need some answers to the following questions:

     •     Does Obama believe children are "born gay" and should be able to declare this identity in grade school and join a "gay" club?
           Kevin Jennings does.

     •     Does Obama believe consensual relationships between 15-year-olds and 29-nine-year-olds are OK? Jennings thinks so. (Some
           think Planned Parenthood does, too – another question for Obama.)

     •     Does Obama believe a "safe" school is one where no one can criticize homosexual behavior? Jennings does.

     •     Does Obama believe that, with the CDC reporting HIV rates rising around 12 percent per year for 13 to 24-year-old males who
           have sex with males (MSM), we still cannot tell our boys to abstain from homosexual behavior? Will he appoint clueless federal
           health officials? Kevin Jennings would approve.

     •     Does Obama believe kids can decide at age 9 or 10 that they were born in the wrong body, want to switch genders and have
           schools support this disorder? Jennings does.

     •     Does Obama believe the Christian moral standard that homosexuality is wrong needs to be suppressed and depicted as "hateful"
           in the public square, including schools? Jennings does.

     •     Does Obama believe that if     same-sex     "marriage" is legalized, this new "law" should be shoved down the throats of all
           children and their parents via social engineering in public schools? Jennings does.

     •     Does Obama believe that "social justice" and "school reform" require students to not just tolerate, but approve of homosexuality
           and gender change? That the "yuck" factor simply will not be allowed, because it reflects bigotry? Jennings does.

If we want a totalitarian, pansexual society, with its accompanying disease, dysfunction and abuse, and no room for nobility, goodness and
tradition, then we need to make sure we vote for Obama with all his various revolutionary hangers-on, including Jennings.

If, on the other hand, we envision another America, it's time to speak up now.

Shared By: