The OD Group
What are competencies and what are their uses?
4 October 2006 Julie Naismith
Principal, Towers Perrin
© 2005 Towers Perrin
Competencies are critical to an organization’s business performance
The Towers Perrin Linkage FrameworkTM
Employee competencies have an impact on the drivers of customer behavior and ultimately business performance
People systems and programs
Rewards and
Employee behavior
Employee behavior
Customer behavior
Customer
Business performance
Revenue growth COGS SG&A EPS Stock performance ROIC
recognition
Performance
management
Learning and
is heavily influenced by their competencies
satisfaction
Loyalty
Market share
Brand power
development
Communication Policies and
procedures
© 2005 Towers Perrin
1
They allow an organization to achieve its business strategy by defining what employees need to do
Competencies are the
combination of knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics that are important for: Organizational or functional success Personal performance Enhanced contribution
Competencies bridge what an
STRATEGY
What is the vision? What are the values? What are the key business
drivers?
organization or function wants to achieve and the specific ways it will get there by describing what employees need to do
What must employees do
exceptionally well to help the organization succeed in achieving its vision and goals?
COMPETENCIES
For competencies to be truly valuable, they should be future-focused and aligned with the organization’s strategy
© 2005 Towers Perrin
2
Competencies can be linked to the success of the organisation
Top-down approach
Driven by organization-level information More future-focused Most effective for: Enabling competencies Broad organization-wide models Applications like performance management,
Organization capabilities Top-down approach
management development, pay Bottom-up approach
Driven by individual-level information More present-focused Most effective for: Domain competencies More narrow models (job, function, role) Applications like selection, succession
Bottom-up approach Employee competencies
© 2005 Towers Perrin
3
The best competency models have three key objectives
1
Strategic
Reinforce the linkage between executing the business strategy
and the people knowledge, skills and abilities needed for success Focus not only on what is necessary for success now, but what will be critical for success in the future Enhance, but not overshadow, an organization’s focus on results
2
Focused
Include a limited number of competencies to focus employees’
attention on those that are truly critical to the organization’s success Scaled to reflect behavioral expectations for different levels of performance Expressed in clear, simple, straightforward language to support ease of application
Supported by all levels of leadership and viewed as an important
3
Integrated
tool across all business units Applied to multiple talent management programs (e.g., succession planning, learning and development, recruitment and selection, performance management) to promote consistency in terminology and focus
© 2005 Towers Perrin
4
Generally, there are two types of competency models
Domain: Function, Role or Job-based Competencies
Necessary for success in a particular function,
Organizational Competency Models
Essential to realizing organizational business
goals
Generally relevant to all employees in the
organization
Communication and Teamwork are common
examples
For some companies, these competencies may
role, or job Applicable to most, but not all, employees of a particular domain (e.g., sales, finance, human resources) Typically not applicable to all employees of the company
Usually involve knowledge in a technical,
be reflected in their Core Values
professional or process area
An example of an HR function competency is
Staffing and Facilitating Change
Organizational Competencies are the same across a company but Domain Competencies are different for various groups in the company
© 2005 Towers Perrin
5
Each type of competency model is focused on a specific segment of the employee population
Organizational competencies Competencies that are common across the organization
Role-based competencies Competencies specific to a particular role (e.g., Manager)
Job-based competencies Competencies specific to a particular job (e.g., Call Center Rep)
Function competencies Competencies specific to the technical requirements of a specific function (e.g., Sales)
© 2005 Towers Perrin
6
Scaling competencies with behavioral anchors is a critical step in the process
When implementing a competency model, and using it to assess performance, it is important to
create a common understanding of expectations by scaling the competencies to describe different levels of contribution
Scaling the model in recognizable organization-specific language allows individual employees to
better understand what is expected of them Behavioral anchors are:
Descriptive statements “Snapshots” to help communicate
Level 1
Behavioral
Competency Name and Definition Level 2
Behavioral
Level 3
Behavioral
Level 4
Behavioral
what demonstration of a competency looks like
Hierarchical Level 1 is lower than
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
Behavioral
anchor
anchor
anchor
anchor
Level 2
Cumulative The behavior described at
Competency is described in behavioral terms, to illustrate how the same competency may be performed at different levels of contribution or career progression
Level 2 implies an ability to demonstrate the behavior described at Level 1
Serve as the foundation for
employee competency assessment
© 2005 Towers Perrin
7
Here is an example of a scaled competency
ILLUSTRATIVE SALES FUNCTION COMPETENCY
Competency
Definition Negotiation Skills
Effectively persuades customers and colleagues in order to reach mutually beneficial agreements and influence important outcomes
Foundational Intermediate Negotiates standard contracts with confidence and builds trust with the negotiating party Creates a common ground by recognizing areas of agreement and focusing on areas of disagreement in a negotiation Captures the full value of an offer, accounting for all factors in a negotiation (e.g., brand, freight, consulting services) Advanced Negotiates complex contracts (multi-year, high dollar volume) maximizing the full value for all parts of the offering Adapts to different negotiation styles (cultural and behavioral) within an organization and resolves issues without negative impact on the relationship Keeps all stakeholders informed and in alignment on difficult or complex negotiation terms Strategic Negotiates global or multi-regional arrangements; develops negotiation strategies based on an in-depth understanding of the deal Alters negotiation approach to address the needs of stakeholders at different tiers in the value chain Positions self and company for the future; knows the key influencers in an organization and “pre-sells” an arrangement
Described at four levels
Negotiates simple, shortterm offers; seeks assistance with more difficult negotiations Arms self with information prior to negotiating with a customer; asks questions to understand the other party’s position Learns to ask for a commitment and persists despite initial rejection
Behavioral Anchor
© 2005 Towers Perrin
8
Competencies come to life when integrated into talent and development programs …
Integrated talent programs are developed by establishing a consistent set of expectations
(competencies), assessing individuals’ performance against them and using the information to drive talent related decisions
Succession Planning
Training
Compensation and Rewards
Development
Competency Model
Career Management
Recruitment
Selection (internal and external)
Performance Management
© 2005 Towers Perrin
9
…by creating a set of common criteria around each of the programs
Talent Programs Training
Tools and Processes
Learning objectives Content Attendee selection based on skill
Implications
People know what is needed for their
job/role
Right people learn right skills and
gaps Development
Development needs defined in terms
knowledge
People know what is expected in their
of competencies required by role/job Development program objectives
current role People know what is required to get to the next level
Identifies paths to strengthen
Career Management
Communication of requirements for
alternative career paths and/or target positions Performance Management
Basis for job/role requirements Used as basis for assessment Links performance management to
succession planning
Communicates job/role requirements
learning and development
to job incumbents and managers Provides a clear mechanism to improve individual performance
Continued…
© 2005 Towers Perrin
10
…by creating a set of common criteria around each of the programs
Talent Management Programs Selection (internal and external)
Tools and Processes
Basis for consistently defining open
Implications
Greater assurance of hired
position requirements
Interviewing protocols Redeployment tools Assessment tools - tests, assessment
employee’s success in position
Reduced turnover
centers Recruitment
Communicate requirements of open Improved self-selection
positions
Compensation and Rewards Succession Planning
Pay and recognition programs keyed Motivated employees to demonstrate
to competency demonstration
Successor candidate identification
the competencies
Increased “bench strength”
and prioritization
© 2005 Towers Perrin
11
Common competencies in use today
Problem Solving Adaptability/Flexibility Decision Making Development of Self/Others Leadership Business Insight Innovation/Creativity Results Orientation Customer Focus Teamwork Communication 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% US 60% UK 70% 80% 90% 100%
Source: 40 Towers Perrin competency projects conducted in the US and UK.
© 2005 Towers Perrin
12
Some Towers Perrin guiding principles on competencies
There is no universal set of competencies: one size does not fit all Competencies should support the key elements of the HR platforms Competencies are not a replacement for results
The number of competencies must be focused
Competencies must be validated and must be “renewed” Competency frameworks must be simple to use, owned by managers, and
linked to outcomes that are relevant to employees
© 2005 Towers Perrin
13