professional documents
home
Upload
docsters
Upload
April 2007 Benefits of Conservation Planning United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Landowner Profile Plum Producer Has a Plan Mike Vereschagin says that his decision to convert from flood irrigation to mircrosprinkler irrigation is having a very positive impact on his 630-acre plum orchard. “Microsprinklers have cut my water use to about a quarter of what it was before, and I’m definitely getting better growth on the trees,” Vereschagin said. “Microsprinklers have cut my water use to about a quarter of what it was before, and I’m definitely getting better growth on the trees.” — Mike Vereschagin Vereschagin Farms Management Goals • More efficient water use; • Improved crop production; • Improved water quality; • Reduced erosion; • Improved pest control. Conservation Practices • Flood irrigation system replaced by microirrigation sprinklers; Vereschagin (right) is a fourthgeneration Glenn County farmer who produces dried plums, almonds, and olives on more than 1,700 acres near Orland. Irrigation water is a major expense for Vereschagin as it is for other farmers in the area. Agricultural water needs often exceed local water district supplies, especially in dry years, leading to increased prices. Rising energy costs for pumping groundwater is another significant financial concern. Vereschagin says that in recent years a lack of groundwater recharge has left his well pumps “sucking air” during the hot summer months. This motivated Vereschagin to try increasing the irrigation efficiency of his plum orchard and to develop a conservation and water management plan. In 2003, Vereschagin began working with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to develop the conservation plan for his orchards. He was interested in NRCS’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) after he learned that the program had become more supportive of orchards and speciality crops. • • • Evapotranspiration (ET) data service used for irrigation scheduling; Works with pest management advisor to monitor pest levels; Pruning and chipping instead of burning. Planning Benefits • Improved irrigation efficiency; • Improved nutrient management; • Reduced erosion; • Increased crop production; • Improved pest control; • Improved water quality; • Improved air quality. NRCS District Conservationist Rob Vlach (left) and Mike Vereschagin (right) reviewing the conservation plan. THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND PROVIDER “In the past, EQIP was more focused on field crops and range issues,” said Vereschagin. “But over time there was a greater realization that orchards can also have a positive impact on the environment.” Vereschagin said that he and his neighbors had noticed a strong outreach effort by NRCS to the orchard community. Working with NRCS staff in Willows, Vereschagin developed a comprehensive conservation plan, not only for his plum orchards, but for his entire 1,700- acre operation. The plan is a road map for Vereschagin, helping define and measure progress to help him reach his conservation goals. As part of his ten-year plan, Vereschagin used EQIP cost-share assistance to install a microirrigation system for his plum trees. The microsprinklers apply water directly to the root zone. With the flexibility this gives him and the aid of an evapotranspiration data service, Vereschagin is now able to maintain uniform soil moisture for optimum plant growth. Optimum moisture and uniformity were not possible using flood irrigation, Vereschagin said. “Flood is a lot harder on the trees. With flood irrigation it’s either really wet or really dry.” The best part is that Vereschagin is saving a lot of water and money. He can irrigate more frequently, maintaining moisture uniformity, without excessive water loss or soil erosion. He is getting excellent growth using less nitrogen fertilizer and is able to add gypsum to the water for better soil structure. “I’m now injecting gypsum into my irrigation water to get better penetration,” Vereschagin said. “It opens up the soil and makes each irrigation more efficient.” Vereschagin is also chipping rather than burning his brush and annual orchard prunings. This not only helps air quality but also helps the soil and helps to suppress weeds. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is another important part of Vereschagin’s plan. He uses traps to monitor insect activity and he receives weekly reports from a pest management specialist. This helps to keep pesticide use to a minimum. “Everything in a plan adds up,” said Vereschagin. “An improvement on one thing has an impact on something else.” Vereschagin says that for his operation conservation planning benefits are adding up to better yields, better fruit, fewer weeds and pests, lower costs, and higher profits. And as a bonus, Vereschagin was well prepared in 2005 when the Conservation Security Program (CSP) became available in his watershed. “By having done all of these practices, I qualified for level 2 CSP stewardship payments,” said Vereschagin. “And because I had a plan in place, all of my homework was done for the CSP application.” It was very simple and rewarding. I highly recommend applying for the program.” “In the past, pest management was done on a calendar basis,” said Vereschagin. “Now, using an IPM approach, we’re monitoring pest thresholds and making decisions based on what we’re actually finding.” Test results from an irrigation mobile lab showed that Vereschagin’s new irrigation system is operating as designed, with 90 percent or better uniformity throughout the orchard.
flag this doc
18
0
not rated
0
6/25/2008
English
Preview

Landowner Profile Mike Bonnheim

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 10 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Hank Stone

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 34 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Gerald Scanlan

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 11 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Alex Palmerlee

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 16 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Jesus Castillo

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 10 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Bill Longfellow

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 9 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile John DeBoni

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 9 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Al Poncia

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 11 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Kira Ezis

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 12 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Peter Carey

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 10 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Cajun James

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 15 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Joshua Sheppard

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 7 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 94 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Mike Vereschagin

FoodInspect 7/10/2008 | 15 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Landowner Profile Rickert Agricultural Services

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 8 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

QP Control of Nonconforming Work

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 51 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

QP Resolution of Complaints

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 52 | 1 | 0 | legal
Preview

Article Separation of Function

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 42 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Article Purpose and Authorities

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 36 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

GIS Special Edition Newsletter

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 56 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Import Manual

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 204 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Report of the APHIS CBP Joint Task Force on Improved Agriculture Inspection

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 47 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Directions to the Professional Development Center Via I­270 North

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 37 | 0 | 0 | legal
Preview

Article Transfer of Funds

NRCS 6/25/2008 | 49 | 0 | 0 | legal
 
review this doc