Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

MADHYA_PRADESH

VIEWS: 10 PAGES: 250

									                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                  Jabalpur (M Corp)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                  Big Class I
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     33.627
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  956107
        Population (as per projection)                                 1099523
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                               9.3
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            15.2
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             9.2
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         70.4
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      4
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.7
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 4
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         68.3
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          4.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              0.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       96.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       14.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      20.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the          YES
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                     YES
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in       YES
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                     YES
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                     YES
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                 YES
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                     YES
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  YES
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         22.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         31.8
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.7            2.0           0.7




     4.0            3.4           0.6




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     2.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0            0.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




4.0   4.0




2.2   2.2
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0                          3.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     6.2                          6.2

     0.0                          0.0


     3.0                          3.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Bhopal (M Corp)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                 Big Class I
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     32.493
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 1458416
        Population (as per projection)                                 1677178
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             10.7
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           15.5
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            6.4
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         43.0
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 9
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         97.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          3.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         28.4
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                     7.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       96.8
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        8.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            5.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              75.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      1.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.7
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         12.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         33.4
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.7            1.5           1.2




     4.0            3.0           1.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     5.0            1.5           3.5




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0            0.0           0.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     3.8                          3.8
4.0   4.0




2.0   2.0




1.7   1.7
     3.0                          3.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     3.4                          3.4

     0.0                          0.0


     3.0                          3.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Indore (M Corp)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                  Big Class I
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     43.259
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 1506062
        Population (as per projection)                                 1731971
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              14.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            17.4
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            11.3
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                          Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         43.6
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.8
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      4
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.6
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 2
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         91.3
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          1.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         56.3
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       75.5
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      YES
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                             100.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      52.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.9
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         19.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         79.7
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.2            2.0           1.2




     4.0            3.2           0.8




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     5.0            0.5           4.5




     1.5            0.5           1.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     2.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     5.0                          5.0
4.0   4.0




2.0   2.0




2.4   2.4
     3.0                          3.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.3                          5.3

     0.0                          0.0


     6.0                          6.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                  Murwara (Katni ) (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                    MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                   Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                        34.189
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                     187029
        Population (as per projection)                                     215083
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                                 8.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                               16.1
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                               9.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                            Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and            Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                             71.3
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                    Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                              0.4
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                          2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                        Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                              0.6
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                     6
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                               Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                      No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                       Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                              3.8
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                              6.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                       Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                              0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open                  3.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       53.3
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            5.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      10.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         16.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         28.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.6            1.0           0.6




     4.0            3.1           0.9




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     0.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            1.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     1.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
8.0   8.0




2.0   2.0




2.1   2.1
     4.0                          4.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.6                          5.6

     0.0                          0.0


     4.0                          4.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                    Shivpuri (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     34.792
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 146892
        Population (as per projection)                                 168926
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             11.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           19.8
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            3.5
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        87.9
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.2
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     1
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                0
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        15.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         8.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                      100.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       12.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      1.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         10.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            0.5           0.5




     4.0            1.0           3.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     0.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.0           2.0




     4.0            2.0           2.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
10.0   10.0




4.0    4.0




1.8    1.8
     4.0                          4.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     3.5                          3.5

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                     Damoh (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     28.025
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 127967
        Population (as per projection)                                 147162
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             10.0
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           12.8
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            5.3
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        50.5
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                6
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        52.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                        12.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       82.5
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       12.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            9.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        3.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     NO
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         15.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.0            1.0           1.0




     4.0            3.0           1.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     1.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




0.8   0.8
     4.0                          4.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.3                          5.3

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Ujjain (M Corp)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     30.206
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  431162
        Population (as per projection)                                  495836
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                               9.4
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            16.0
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             4.9
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         30.5
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.8
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 8
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         25.0
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          6.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              0.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       86.7
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      NO
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      20.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the          YES
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                     YES
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in       YES
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                     YES
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                     YES
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  YES
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         14.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.9            1.0           0.9




     4.0            3.5           0.5




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     0.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            0.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




4.0   4.0




2.0   2.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0                          3.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     4.9                          4.9

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Khargone (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     27.400
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 103448
        Population (as per projection)                                 118965
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             14.8
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            9.5
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            3.2
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        57.5
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     0
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                0
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        69.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         1.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       92.6
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        7.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     NO
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                     YES
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         9.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         6.5
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.0            0.0           2.0




     4.0            1.0           3.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     2.0            0.5           1.5




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     3.0            1.8           1.3




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




1.0   1.0
     0.0                          0.0




     0.5                          0.5




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     3.2                          3.2

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Sagar (M Corp)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     23.109
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 244721
        Population (as per projection)                                 281429
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              5.7
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           10.8
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            6.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        30.6
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.3
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.6
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                5
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        41.3
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         5.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                     8.8
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       77.6
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        5.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            6.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        3.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         16.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         20.2
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.2            1.0           0.2




     4.0            3.3           0.8




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     1.0            2.5           0.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0




     2.0            1.3           0.8




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




1.8   1.8
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.6                          5.6

     0.0                          0.0


     1.0                          1.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Ratlam (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                 Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                      24.750
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                   222202
        Population (as per projection)                                   255532
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                               9.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            10.0
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             5.3
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                          Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         38.8
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.8
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 8
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         32.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          5.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       83.3
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       12.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         15.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.0            1.0           1.0




     4.0            3.5           0.5




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     0.0            2.5           0.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




2.0   2.0
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.3                          5.3

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                     Vidisha (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     27.586
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  125453
        Population (as per projection)                                  144271
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              9.1
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           15.3
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            3.1
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        34.4
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.8
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.4
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                4
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        77.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         3.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                    47.9
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       75.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        9.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            2.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      YES
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      5.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.5
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the          YES
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                     YES
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         6.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         20.2
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.5           1.5




     4.0            2.9           1.1




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     3.0            1.5           1.5




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            0.0           1.0




     2.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.0                          3.8
5.0   5.0




2.0   2.0




1.6   1.6
     2.0                          2.0




     1.0                          1.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     2.1                          2.1

     0.0                          0.0


     1.0                          1.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Mandsaur (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     36.529
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 117555
        Population (as per projection)                                 135188
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              8.4
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           16.5
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                           11.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        54.4
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.9
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                8
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        38.8
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         4.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       70.3
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      10.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.4
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         16.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         54.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.7            1.5           1.2




     4.0            3.8           0.3




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     0.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     2.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0
10.0   10.0




4.0    4.0




1.5    1.5
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.6                          5.6

     0.0                          0.0


     6.0                          6.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                  Khandwa (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     29.877
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  172242
        Population (as per projection)                                  198078
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             12.7
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           10.0
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            7.2
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         35.6
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.2
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      1
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.4
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 8
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         95.0
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          2.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       86.7
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       10.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            2.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         9.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         39.4
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            0.5           0.5




     4.0            2.8           1.3




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     5.0            1.0           4.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.0           2.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




2.0   2.0
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     3.2                          3.2

     0.0                          0.0


     4.0                          4.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Dewas (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     26.783
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 231672
        Population (as per projection)                                 266423
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             12.7
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            9.2
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            4.9
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         72.5
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.2
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      0
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 1
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         76.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          2.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       71.2
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        5.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        3.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      10.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.1
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         14.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            0.0           1.0




     4.0            2.0           2.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     3.0            1.0           2.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     2.0            1.3           0.8




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




1.2   1.2
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     4.9                          4.9

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                  Singrauli (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                 Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                      20.633
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                   185190
        Population (as per projection)                                   212969
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                               7.9
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                             7.8
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             4.9
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                          Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                          72.8
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.9
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 2
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                          77.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          6.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                    54.1
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       93.7
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            2.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      NO
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     NO
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      10.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.1
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                    65.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         14.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.6            1.0           1.6




     4.0            3.7           0.3




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     3.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            0.0           1.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




1.0   1.0




0.8   0.8
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     4.9                          4.9

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                     Bhind (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     21.950
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 153752
        Population (as per projection)                                 176815
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             10.9
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            5.8
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            5.3
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        33.3
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         1.0
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     1
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.8
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                2
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        67.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         8.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       88.9
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       12.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      NO
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         15.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         2.8
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     4.0            0.5           3.5




     4.0            3.6           0.4




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     2.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.0           2.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
2.0   2.0




2.0   2.0




1.8   1.8
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.3                          5.3

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Chhatarpur (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     32.050
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 109078
        Population (as per projection)                                 125440
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             14.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           13.0
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            4.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        42.7
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.3
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     0
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                0
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        84.3
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         8.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             4.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                      100.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        6.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            7.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        4.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      30.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.7
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         13.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            0.0           1.0




     4.0            1.0           3.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     4.0            3.0           1.0




     0.0            2.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     4.0            1.5           2.5




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
8.0   8.0




2.0   2.0




2.0   2.0
     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     4.6                          4.6

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                  Gwalior (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     23.393
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 827026
        Population (as per projection)                                 951080
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              9.0
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           12.3
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            2.1
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                         40.2
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                          0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                          0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 4
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                         92.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                          6.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                          0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open              1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                    56.3
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       66.7
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       10.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                       56.7
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                             100.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.8
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                     YES
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         6.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.0            1.0           1.0




     4.0            3.0           1.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     5.0            3.0           2.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     1.0            1.0           0.0




     2.0            2.0           0.0




     1.0                          1.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.0                          3.0
5.0   5.0




2.0   2.0




1.8   1.8
     0.0                          0.0




     0.5                          0.5




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     2.1                          2.1

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                  Burhanpur (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                  MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                 Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                      30.828
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                   193725
        Population (as per projection)                                   222784
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              12.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                            16.3
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                             2.1
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                          Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and        Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                          23.9
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                                Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                           0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                      3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                    Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                           0.6
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                 7
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                           Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                  No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                   Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                          96.7
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                           4.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                   Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                           0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open               2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                    82.4
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                      100.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        7.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      YES
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the          YES
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in       YES
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                     YES
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         6.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.5           1.5




     4.0            3.3           0.8




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     5.0            2.0           3.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     2.0            1.0           1.0




     4.0            1.8           2.3




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.0                          3.8
3.0   3.0




2.0   2.0




2.0   2.0
     4.0                          4.0




     1.5                          1.5




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     2.1                          2.1

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Rewa (M Corp.)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     31.248
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 183274
        Population (as per projection)                                 210765
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              7.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           16.1
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            7.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        88.1
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.9
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                3
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        75.0
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         8.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                     4.7
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       92.5
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                       42.9
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.7
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.4
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         16.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         29.6
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.8            1.5           1.3




     4.0            3.8           0.3




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     3.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0            0.0           0.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     1.0                          1.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0
8.0   8.0




2.0   2.0




2.1   2.1
     3.0                          3.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.6                          5.6

     0.0                          0.0


     2.0                          2.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Satna (M Corp)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     24.920
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  229307
        Population (as per projection)                                  263703
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              8.7
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           11.7
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            4.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        45.2
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     2
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.6
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                3
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        71.3
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         7.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       96.1
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       10.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            8.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        5.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      NO
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      5.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.7
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         13.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.9            1.0           0.9




     4.0            3.3           0.8




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     3.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.0           2.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




2.0   2.0




1.7   1.7
     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     4.6                          4.6

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Neemuch (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     23.525
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 112852
        Population (as per projection)                                 129780
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              9.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           10.5
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            3.5
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        55.6
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.6
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.9
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                3
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        87.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         3.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       42.5
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       11.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            6.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        3.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              1.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      NO
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     NO
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      20.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.3
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     3.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         10.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         7.1
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.3            1.5           0.8




     4.0            3.8           0.3




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     4.0            1.5           2.5




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.0           2.0




     1.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
6.0   6.0




4.0   4.0




0.5   0.5
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     3.5                          3.5

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                     Guna (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     39.792
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 137175
        Population (as per projection)                                 157751
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              7.5
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           22.5
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            9.8
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        90.9
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.7
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.9
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                               20
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        20.0
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                        12.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             1.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                    60.8
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       89.3
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        9.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            3.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        1.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                       YES
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      YES
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      1.0
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                     YES
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                     YES
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         16.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          3.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     2.7            1.5           1.2




     4.0            3.8           0.3




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     0.0            3.0           0.0




     0.0            0.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     2.0            1.0           1.0




     3.0            2.0           1.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     1.0                          1.0




     0.0                          0.0
10.0   10.0




4.0    4.0




2.0    2.0
     5.0                          5.0




     0.5                          0.5




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.6                          5.6

     4.2                          4.2


     0.0                          0.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                   Chhindwara (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     34.160
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                  153552
        Population (as per projection)                                  176585
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                             14.2
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           14.1
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            5.9
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        55.4
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         1.0
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     3
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.8
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                4
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        82.5
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         2.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             3.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        0.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       95.3
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                        7.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            6.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        3.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      20.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.9
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         14.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         24.5
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     3.9            1.5           2.4




     4.0            3.5           0.5




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     4.0            1.0           3.0




     0.0            1.5           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            0.0           3.0




     3.0            1.8           1.3




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
10.0   10.0




2.0    2.0




2.1    2.1
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     4.9                          4.9

     0.0                          0.0


     1.0                          1.0
                 City Sanitation Rating Project
                            CITY SCORE SHEET
        City Name                                                    Morena (M)
        State Name                                                 MADHYA PRADESH
        City category                                                Other Class 1
        Total score for the city (with colour code)                     28.793
        Population (as per 2001Census)                                 150959
        Population (as per projection)                                 173603
        1.Total Of Output Related Indicators                              9.3
        2. Total Of Process Related Indicators                           13.9
        3. Total Of Outcome Related Indicators                            5.6
        1. OUTPUT RELATED INDICATORS DETAILS:                         Max Marks
         Access and use of toilets by urban poor and other un-
1A_i    served households (including slums) by individual and       Max Marks - 4
        community sanitation facilities
        Estimated population of the sample slums practising
                                                                        53.4
        open defecation
        Access and use of toilets for floating and institutional
1A_ii                                                               Max Marks - 4
        populations - adequate public sanitation facilities
       Proportion of Functional and working Toilets to number
                                                                         0.5
       of field visit points
       No. of instance of urination/ open defecation                     1
1A_iii No open defecation visible                                   Max Marks - 4
       Proportion of field visits where OD was visible to the
                                                                         0.5
       total field visit points
       Instances of "OD" on railway track                                9
1A_iv Manual Scavenging eliminated in City                          Max Marks - 4
       Whether Manual scavenging being practised in ULB                 No
       Proportion of total properties with safe collection
1B                                                                  Max Marks - 6
       arrangements for human excreta
       Percentage of properties having safe collection
                                                                        85.0
       arrangements of human excreta
       Total instances of breakage, ex-filtration or overflow of
                                                                         8.0
       feacal matter observed
       Proportion of total black waste water generation that is
1C                                                                  Max Marks - 9
       treated and safely disposed off
       Percentage of black wastewater treated and safely
                                                                         0.0
       disposed off after Secondary treatment
       Total no. of instance of unsafe disposal or dumping of
       black-water into water courses, water bodies, or open             2.0
       areas
     Proportion of treated wastewater that is recycled and
1E                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     reused for non potable applications
     Percentage of of treated wastewater recycled and re-
                                                                        0.0
     used (after Secondary treatment)

     Proportion of total storm-water and drainage that is
1F                                                                 Max Marks - 3
     efficiently and safely managed (3 points for 100%)
     Percentage Stormwater Coverage                                   100.0
     Percentage of drain-overflow and breakage are found in
                                                                        1.0
     more than 50% of observation points
     Whether more than 50% of the road network
     observed/reported to be prone to recurrent                         No
     flooding/waterlogging
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is
1G                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     regularly collected
     Percentage of total solid waste generated that is
                                                                       55.0
     regularly collected
     Instances of solid waste observed to be visibly littered in
                                                                       12.0
     the city
     Proportion of total solid waste generation that is treated
1H                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     and safely disposed off
     Percentage of total solid waste generation that is
                                                                        0.0
     treated and safely disposed off
     City wastes cause no adverse impacts on surrounding
1I                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     areas outside city limits
     No. of locations where land or water body outside the
     city receiving any untreated human excreta or untreated            4.0
     solid waste (including leachate)
     Instances of untreated grey water (water flowing in the
                                                                        2.0
     drains)
     2. PROCESS RELATED INDICATORS                                  Max Marks
     M&E systems are in place to track incidences of open
2A                                                                 Max Marks - 4
     defecation
     Does the ULB have a mechanism in place to monitor
                                                                        NO
     incidents of Open Defecation? (Y/N)
     If yes, is data of OD incidents collected on a monthly
                                                                        NO
     basis? (Y/N)
     Is such data reported on a regular basis (monthly) in
                                                                        NO
     public forums? (Y/N)
     Are awards/ incentives given to discourage Open
                                                                        NO
     Defecation? (Y/N)
     All sewerage systems in the city are working properly and
2B                                                                 Max Marks - 5
     there is no ex-filtration
     Has the ULB provided gear and safety equipment to the
                                                                      NO
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether Mechanical systems are being used for
                                                                      NO
     monitoring and cleaning/maintenance of sewers (Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      NO
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Does the ULB have a complaint redressal system for
                                                                      NO
     sewerage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Cost Recovery for Sewerage Services                              0.0
     Septage / sludge is regularly cleaned, safely transported
2C   and disposed after treatment, from on-site systems in       Max Marks - 10
     the city
     Has the ULB provided safety gear and equipment to the
                                                                      YES
     sanitary workers?(Y/N)
     Whether the mechnical system is in place for cleaning of
                                                                      YES
     Tanks and Pits (Y/N)
     Whether the cleaning and disposal of sludge from tanks
                                                                      YES
     and pits are monitored (Y/N)
     whether there is functioning grievance redressal
                                                                      YES
     mechanism for Septage related complaints?(Y/N)
     Are workers provided Insurance/ Provident Fund/
                                                                      YES
     Gratuity? (Y/N)
     Storm water drainage systems functioning and
2D                                                               Max Marks - 4
     maintained
     Is there centralized database/map of drainage system
                                                                      NO
     available (Y/N)
     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Is cleaning, repairs and maintenance of drains
                                                                      YES
     undertaken at one other season than pre-monsoon (Y/N)

     Solid waste management (collection and treatment)
2E                                                               Max Marks - 5
     systems are efficient
     ULB has either framed their own rules or formally
     adopted MSW 2000 rules for SW Collection and                     YES
     Treatment (Y/N)
     Percentage of households and establishments covered by
                                                                      0.0
     daily door-to-door solid waste collection system
     Proportion of the city’s streets effectively covered by
                                                                      0.9
     regular street-sweeping (at least once a day)
     Proportion of waste that is processed or recycled (in a
                                                                      0.0
     waste recycling facility operated by ULB/agents)

     Percentage of Cost Recovery for SWM Services                     0.0

     Documented operational system and clear institutional
2F                                                               Max Marks - 4
     responsibility assigned for the services
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Sewerage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Septage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Storm water drainage
     Whether written manual and procedures existing in
                                                                      NO
     practice for Solid waste management

     Sanctions for deviance on part of polluters and
2G                                                               Max Marks - 3
     institutions is clearly laid out and followed in practice
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
     offenders a)Letting out untreated human excreta in the           NO
     open (Y/N)
     State/ULB Act explicitly provides for punishing/fining
                                                                      NO
     offenders Littering
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
     in practice for a) Letting out untreated human excreta in        NO
     the open(Y/N)
     Rules and regulations are framed and being implemented
                                                                      NO
     in practice b) Littering
     There are instances of fining or punishing people in the
     last one year for following (Y/N)
     Letting out untreated human excreta in the open
                                                                      NO
     (number of instances)
     Littering (number of instances)                                  NO
     Whether monitoring system exists to point out polluters
                                                                      NO
     (Y/N)
     Whether reports produced (Y/N)                                  NO
     3. OUTCOME RELATED INDICATORS                                Max Marks
3A   Quality of drinking water                                   Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                         16.0
3B   Water Quality in water bodies in and around city            Max Marks - 7
     Number of samples passing quality tests                          0.0
     Reduction in water Bourne disease incidence amongst
3C                                                               Max Marks - 6
     city population
Percentage reduction in diarrhoeal disease over last 3
                                                         0.0
years
Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     1.8            0.5           1.3




     4.0            3.0           1.0




     4.0            0.0           4.0


     4.0            3.0           1.0




     0.0            1.0           0.0
     0.0                          0.0




     3.0            1.0           2.0




     1.0            2.0           0.0




     0.0                          0.0




     5.0            5.0           0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded

     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0
10.0   10.0




2.0    2.0




1.9    1.9
     0.0                          0.0




     0.0                          0.0




Marks Obtained   Deduction   Marks Awarded
     5.6                          5.6

     0.0                          0.0


     0.0                          0.0

								
To top