Get documents about "Economy - Local Government Yorkshire and Humber
Document Sample
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in RSS) Indicator as 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or
Listed in RSS text REF in 2008 Response Data CD
ECONOMY
E1 Creating a Economic Growth of the region Success of the TH11
Successful and has been consistent with the Regional
Competitive Plan's Vision and Core Approach Economy
Regional Economy
The region has developed a Entrepreneurship, TH12
modern and successful economy Innovation and
which is entrepreneurial, New Business
competitive and knowledge Formation
driven and based on a modern
sectorial mix
Economic restructuring and
diversification of the region
through up skilling of the
workforce.
Cites and urban areas have Contribution to TH13
develop as key drivers of the Economy from
regional productivity. Cities and Urban
There has been a growth in Areas
business related to the region's
unique environmental assets.
There has been a significant Contribution to TH14
improvement in access from the Economy from
rural areas to economic Rural Areas
opportunities.
E2 Town Centres City and town centre are the Development in TH15/BD4
and Major Facilities focus for the services and Town Centres
activities which generate a high
level of people movement.
Vibrant and successful town Health of Town TH16
centres have been developed in Centres
the region.
E3 Land and A continuous and adequate Employment Land TH17/BD3
Premises for supply of appropriate Supply by Type
Economic employment land has been
Development provided in the region to support
regional economic development.
The Regional TH18
Employment Land
Portfolio
E4 Support for Successful, sustainable clusters Growth of TH20
Regional Priority have developed and these have Regional Industry
Sectors and been integrated with a Clusters
Clusters knowledge driven economy.
E4 Support for Successful, sustainable clusters Growth of TH20
Regional Priority have developed and these have Regional Industry
Sectors and been integrated with a Clusters
Clusters knowledge driven economy.
E5 Safeguarding Strategic employment sites Allocation in TH21 Y AVERAGE CD
Employment Land necessary to support the Plan's Local
core strategy have been Development
safeguarded and delivered. Frameworks of
Safeguarded
Employment Sites
E6 Sustainable Tourism has been recognised Contribution of TH22
Tourism and valued as a key component Tourism to the
of regional economic activity Regional
making a significant contribution Economy
to the local and regional
economy.
A diverse and sustainable Popularity of TH23 Y AVERAGE CD
tourism industry has developed Visitor Attractions
in the region. in the Region
Tourism has contributed to Tourism Related TH24 N NA NM
improving the local skills based Rural
and employment opportunities in Diversification
the region.
E7 Rural Economy The region has supported the Rural Economic TH25
development of a strong and Performance
diverse rural economy.
Safeguarding TH26 N NA NM
Distinctive Rural
Character
AMR Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Chapter REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
Economic performance (GVA) TH11A Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Index of Sustainable Economic TH11B Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Wellbeing
Unemployment TH11C Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Income levels TH11D Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Employment sector change TH11E Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Breakdown of research and TH12A N NA NM
development performed in UK
Businesses
% of businesses remaining registered TH12B Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
for Vat after 3 years of registration
% regional workforce employed in non- TH12C N NA NM
business class sectors
Location of jobs TH12D Y AVERAGE AMR/CD Chapter 3
Business start ups TH12E Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Amount of completed retail, office and HT6 Y AVERAGE AMR/CD Chapter 2
leisure development respectively
% change in economic activity and TH14A N NA NM
employment rates in rural areas.
Rural income deprivation TH14B N N NM
GVA from rural towns as a % of LA TH14C N NA NM
GVA and regional GVA
Amount of completed retail, office and HT6/BD1 Y AVERAGE AMR/CD Chapter 2
leisure development respectively
Number of LA's to have completed TH16A Y AVERAGE CD Chapter 2
town centre health checks.
Improvements to Town Centre Health TH16B Y AVERAGE CD Chapter 2
Percentage of employment land TH17A Y GOOD CD Chapter 5
completions on previously developed
land
Amount of land developed for HT5 Y GOOD AMR/CD Chapter 2 &
employment by type by LA and 3
settlement type.
Has an employment land review been TH18A Y GOOD CD Chapter 2 &
undertaken/updated for each LA, on 3
which LDF strategy is based?
Total employment change in TH11E N NA CD Chapter 3
employment by sectors
% Regional workforce employed in TH12C N NA CD Chapter 3
non-business class sectors
Research and development TH12A N NA CD Chapter 3
performed in UK Businesses
Chapter 2, 3
and 5
Tourism Employment TH22A Y GOOD AMR/CD Chapter 3
Tourism VAT Registrations per TH22B Y GOOD AMR/CD Chapter 3
10,000 population / Vat registrations
by Region
Tourist visits to the region by amount TH22C Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
of spend per visitor / LA
Chapter 3
% change in economic activity and TH14A N NA NM
employment rates in rural areas.
Rural Income Deprivation TH14B N NA NM
GVA from rural towns as a % of LA TH14C N NA NM
GVA and regional GVA
RSS Policy Indicator as Listed in RSS text 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In
ECONOMY
E1 Creating a Success of the Regional Economy TH11
Successful and
Competitive Regional
Economy
Entrepreneurship, Innovation and TH12
New Business Formation
Contribution to the Economy from TH13
Cities and Urban Areas
Contribution to the Economy from TH14
Rural Areas
Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In
Economic performance (GVA) TH11A Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Index of Sustainable Economic Wellbeing TH11B Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Unemployment TH11C Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Income levels TH11D Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Employment sector change TH11E Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Breakdown of research and development TH12A N NA NM
performed in UK Businesses
% of businesses remaining registered for Vat TH12B Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
after 3 years of registration
% regional workforce employed in non- TH12C N NA NM
business class sectors
Location of jobs TH12D Y AVERAGE AMR/CD Chapter 3
Business start ups TH12E Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
Amount of completed retail, office and leisure HT6 Y AVERAGE AMR/CD Chapter 2
development respectively
% change in economic activity and TH14A N NA NM
employment rates in rural areas.
Rural income deprivation TH14B N N NM
GVA from rural towns as a % of LA GVA and TH14C N NA NM
regional GVA
Indicator TH11 Success of the Regional Economy
Indicator TH11A Economic Performance (GVA)
YH4: Regional cities and sub regional cities and towns, E1: Creating a Succesful and
Policy Reference Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
Total GVA (£billion) by Year and Region
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
England 645.5 677.5 706.5 744.7 787.1 835.6 885.6 921.8
Yorkshire and
Humber 57.0 58.9 61.0 64.2 67.8 75.8 75.8 78.5
North East 26.6 27.3 28.3 29.6 31.1 35.1 35.1 36.7
North West 78.2 81.4 84.3 88.4 92.6 103.0 103.0 106.5
East Midlands 49.8 51.5 53.4 56.5 59.7 67.8 67.8 70.6
West Midlands 63.2 65.4 67.8 71.0 74.1 81.8 81.8 84.8
East of England 73.8 77.8 81.9 86.8 91.1 101.5 101.5 105.0
London 120.9 129.0 134.7 141.8 153.4 176.8 176.8 186.2
South East 117.9 125.0 131.1 138.7 145.5 162.3 162.3 168.6
South West 58.2 61.1 63.9 67.8 71.8 81.6 81.6 84.9
Source: ONS, Regional, Sub Regional and Local Gross Value Added
Indicator TH11 Success of the Regional Economy
Indicator TH11B Index of Sustainable Economic Wellbeing
ccesful and
Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
Indicator of Sustainable Economic Well Being
2006 Total Regional ISEW (£ Million) By Year and Region (HL 2b)
968.6 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
82.1 England 428,535 451,910 462,298 487,225 515,025
38.8 Yorkshire and Humber 31,809 32,236 35,040 36,393 40,011
111.3 North East 22,228 22,496 22,984 24,379 24,398
74.1 North West 70,210 70,759 75,055 77,740 79,299
89.0 East Midlands 33,211 35,377 36,840 39,706 40,046
109.9 West Midlands 51,398 50,805 52,874 53,353 53,195
196.8 East of England 42,877 45,854 46,117 45,925 50,116
177.2 London 59,243 67,122 67,848 76,806 85,367
89.5 South East 69,103 66,934 73,676 78,133 83,172
South West 48,325 49,851 53,169 55,192 60,326
Source: New Economics Foundation, The Regional Index of Sustainable Ec
Progress in the Region, 2008, Table 2.5
my Indicator TH11 Success of the Regional Economy
Wellbeing Indicator TH11C Unemployment
ompetitive Regional Economy Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive
8 AMR 200
onomic Well Being Unemployment Rate of working age population, as of April
each year
y Year and Region (HL 2b)
2004- 2005-
2003 2004 2005 2006 2005 2006
528,259 537,337 538,777 536,993 Barnsley 4.8 6.2
44,521 45,964 46,688 47,365 Bradford 5.4 5.7
25,380 25,097 24,984 25,183 Calderdale 3 3.7
82,265 82,476 82,700 83,146 Craven 1 !
40,538 45,039 47,156 49,274 Doncaster 4.7 6.2
55,994 56,741 56,460 57,180 East Riding of Yorkshire 3.4 4.8
50,900 52,024 51,960 50,422 Hambleton 2.2 2.8
85,115 86,163 87,752 87,679 Harrogate 1.8 1.3
79,089 79,190 75,513 72,495 Hull 7.6 6.1
65,094 64,986 65,630 64,254 Kirklees 4.2 4.2
Regional Index of Sustainable Economic Leeds 4.3 6.5
North East Lincolnshire 6.8 6.3
North Lincolnshire 4.2 5.3
Richmondshire 4 !
Rotherham 3.9 4.7
Ryedale 1.9 6.7
Scarborough 3.3 4.9
Selby 3.5 3.5
Sheffield 6.6 6.5
Wakefield 3.3 5.2
York 2.2 2.8
Source:
Annual Population survey (through NOMIS)
Notes: April 04/05/07 - March 05/06/08
! Estimate and confidence interval not
available since the group sample size is zero
or disclosive (0-2).
NOTE: data from the period Apr 07 - Mar 08
Claimant Count as a proportion of resident working ag
2001 2002
Barnsley 3.5 2.8
Bradford 4.1 3.9
Calderdale 3.3 3.2
Craven 1.4 1.2
Doncaster 3.6 3.2
EROY 2.7 2.3
Hambleton 1.3 1.3
Harrogate 1.1 1
Hull 6.1 5.6
Kirklees 2.8 2.5
Leeds 3.1 2.9
NE Lincolnshire 5.3 4.5
North Lincolnshire 3.3 2.7
Richmondshire 1.3 1.1
Rotherham 3.6 3.2
Ryedale 1.5 1.3
Scarborough 3.6 3.4
Selby 1.9 1.7
Sheffield 4 3.7
Wakefield 3 2.7
York 1.9 1.7
Source: ONS (through Nomis),
Link
Notes The working age population figures are deriv
compatible with the 2001 Census
DWP administrative data on the population o
64) who were claiming at least one key benef
Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPL
Claimant Count of resident working age population,
2001 2002
UK 1,006,416 982,737
GB 966,885 945,587
England 803,354 788,389
Wales 53,868 48,809
Scotland 109,663 108,389
N. Ireland 39,531 37,150
Eng. & Wales 857,222 837,198
Source: ONS (through NOMIS)
of the Regional Economy
yment
ing a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
king age population, as of April
ch year
2006- 2007-
2007 2008
5.7 4.12
6.4 5.3
4.7 3.8
4 !
5.8 5.02
4.5 2.49
5.1 !
! 1.16
9.1 5.86
4.4 3.89
5.1 4.93
7 5.77
5.8 3.95
! 3.13
7.4 4.44
4.7 3.26
5.2 3.24
7.9 3.39
7.4 3.68
4.9 3.9
5.4 3.34
opulation survey (through NOMIS)
5/07 - March 05/06/08
e and confidence interval not
since the group sample size is zero
ve (0-2).
ta from the period Apr 07 - Mar 08
proportion of resident working age population, as of April each year, 2001 - 2008
%
Change
(07 -08)
%
Change
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 (07 -08)
2.6 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.6 0%
3.7 3.2 2.8 3.4 3.4 3 -12%
2.9 2.3 2.2 2.8 2.9 2.6 -10%
0.9 0.9 0.7 1 1 1 0%
2.9 2.7 2.9 3.5 3.1 2.9 -6%
2.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.7 -11%
1.2 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0%
1 1 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.9 -18%
5.5 5.1 5.1 5.8 5.7 4.9 -14%
2.4 2.1 2 2.6 2.6 2.5 -4%
2.9 2.5 2.7 3.1 2.9 2.5 -14%
3.8 4 4.1 4.2 4 3.4 -15%
2.5 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.4 -11%
1.1 1.2 1 1.1 1.1 0.9 -18%
2.9 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.5 -4%
1.1 1.2 1 1.3 1.1 1 -9%
2.8 2.7 2.4 2.9 2.8 2.6 -7%
1.5 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.5 -12%
3.5 3 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.5 -11%
2.6 2.1 2.2 2.8 2.5 2.3 -8%
1.6 1.6 1.4 2 1.5 1.5 0%
ough Nomis),
ng age population figures are derived from mid-year population estimates which are
e with the 2001 Census
ministrative data on the population of working age (females aged 16-59 and males aged 16-
were claiming at least one key benefit. The figures are derived from a 100% data source – the
Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS).
resident working age population, as of April each year, 2001 - 2008
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
966,093 905,226 871,778 981,198 918,512 835,185
932,361 873,535 843,169 952,994 893,329 810,417
782,546 731,500 711,695 813,412 767,702 695,260
46,430 43,008 41,063 46,921 42,824 41,529
103,385 99,027 90,411 92,661 82,803 73,628
33,732 31,691 28,609 28,204 25,183 24,768
828,976 774,508 752,758 860,333 810,526 736,789
ough NOMIS)
Indicator TH11 Success of the Regional Economy
Indicator TH11D Income Levels
Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
Personal Income (Median Weekly Pay £) by Year and Region
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
England 397.2 411.3 425.9 437.3 450.4 462.6
Yorkshire and
Humber 360 375.5 391.5 400 412.5 425
North East 343.2 350.5 368.8 383.3 391.5 400.5
North West 370.2 383.2 395 409.5 419.6 432.7
East Midlands 369.6 385.7 391.6 412.2 423.1 429.7
West Midlands 366 378.9 392.9 404.7 416.2 430.4
East of England 415.9 431.7 447.6 456.7 466 479.1
London 479.9 496.3 509.8 526.7 537.6 553.3
South East 435.1 451 461.8 468.9 486.5 499.6
South West 367.1 383.9 396.9 406 420.5 433.4
Source: ONS, Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings
Indicator TH11 Success of the Regional Economy
Indicator TH11E Employment Sector Change
Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
Local Authority % all in % all in Difference %
employment who employment who
work in - work in -
manufacturing manufacturing
2004-2005 2007-2008 2004-2008
Barnsley 18500 16000 -2500 -14
Bradford 37000 31300 -5700 -15
Calderdale 17600 17900 300 2
Craven 2200 3900 1700 77
Doncaster 18100 15000 -3100 -17
East Riding of Yorkshire 23100 28600 5500 24
Hambleton 3600 5800 2200 61
Harrogate 8500 6200 -2300 -27
Kingston upon Hull 23900 21600 -2300 -10
Kirklees 34900 43200 8300 24
Leeds 45900 47200 1300 3
North East Lincolnshire 15200 13500 -1700 -11
North Lincolnshire 17400 14700 -2700 -16
Richmondshire ! 2100 N/A N/A
Rotherham 19700 19300 -400 -2
Ryedale 1900 4300 2400 126
Scarborough 4600 5500 900 20
Selby 7900 7300 -600 -8
Sheffield 34100 31000 -3100 -9
Wakefield 21100 19000 -2100 -10
York 10600 10300 -300 -3
Yorkshire and Humber 365900 363900 -2000 -1
Source: NOMIS - Annual Population Survey
conomy
% all in % all in Difference % % all in % all in
employment who employment who employment who employment who
work in - work in - work in - total work in - total
construction construction services services
2004-2005 2007-2008 2004-2008 2004-2005 2007-2008
9800 12000 2200 22 68600 70300
12300 17800 5500 45 150400 162600
5200 7100 1900 37 67300 67300
2100 3100 1000 48 21100 20200
17000 13400 -3600 -21 89400 99000
10400 11800 1400 13 110900 111000
2200 3600 1400 64 35000 32200
3300 5500 2200 67 63800 67900
6700 10100 3400 51 71300 75800
14400 14400 0 0 131500 131800
30000 29600 -400 -1 268700 298800
5800 6000 200 3 45100 53300
6100 7900 1800 30 46600 51200
2200 2500 300 14 19100 18700
11800 10500 -1300 -11 82200 83300
2000 2900 900 45 18100 15400
4000 4900 900 23 36600 34900
4500 3300 -1200 -27 24200 27700
16500 14200 -2300 -14 174900 197800
14000 15700 1700 12 116800 114700
8200 8700 500 6 72400 82500
188500 205100 16600 9 1714000 1816300
Difference %
2004-2008
1700 2
12200 8
0 0
-900 -4
9600 11
100 0
-2800 -8
4100 6
4500 6
300 0
30100 11
8200 18
4600 10
-400 -2
1100 1
-2700 -15
-1700 -5
3500 14
22900 13
-2100 -2
10100 14
102300 6
Indicator TH12 Entrepreneurship, Innovation and New Indicator TH12
Business Formation
Indicator TH12A Breakdown of research and development Indicator TH12B
performed in UK Businesses
E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive
Policy Reference Regional Economy Policy Reference
T
NOT MONITORED
England
Yorkshire and
Humber
North East
North West
East Midlands
West Midlands
East
London
South East
South West
Source:
Entrepreneurship, Innovation and New Business Formation
Percentage of businesses remaining registered for VAT after 3 years of
registration
E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
Three Year Business Survival Rate
Year of registration
Percentage
change 1995
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 -2002
65.3 66.7 68.3 67.6 68.2 68.2 69.4 71.2 9
64.8 65.8 68.3 66.7 68.5 66.7 69.8 71.8 10.8
62.5 65.8 67.6 67.2 67.3 67.1 68.8 70.4 12.6
63 63.5 64.5 64.9 65.6 66.2 67.8 71.4 13.3
65.2 66.3 68.3 68.4 70.1 69.5 70.7 72.2 10.7
63.4 65.6 67.2 68 68.4 69.5 69.2 70.6 11.4
67.4 69.5 70.8 70.4 70.7 70.4 71.2 72.9 8.2
62.6 63.9 65.1 63.6 64 64 65.3 66.9 6.9
68.6 70.1 71.6 70.8 71.2 71.4 72.2 73.2 6.7
68.8 69.8 71.7 70.5 70.6 71.1 72.7 74 7.6
DTI Small Business Service February 2007
Indicator TH12 Entrepreneurship, Innovation and New Business Formation
Indicator TH12C Percentage of regional workforce employed in non-business
class sectors
Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
NOT MONITORED
Source
Note:
Indicator TH12 Entrepreneurship, Innovation and New Business Formation
Indicator TH12D Location of jobs
Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
TH12D Location of Job Growth
% of total in Region
2004 2005 % Change 05
Barnsley 86,000 85,000 -1.16% 3.31%
Bradford 220,000 221,000 0.45% 8.61%
Calderdale 98,000 95,000 -3.06% 3.70%
Craven 30,000 31,000 3.33% 1.21%
Doncaster 126,000 129,000 2.38% 5.02%
East Riding 131,000 130,000 -0.76% 5.06%
Hambleton 49,000 52,000 6.12% 2.02%
Harrogate 83,000 85,000 2.41% 3.31%
Hull 140,000 135,000 -3.57% 5.26%
Kirklees 183,000 186,000 1.64% 7.24%
Leeds 459,000 458,000 -0.22% 17.83%
NE Lincolnshire 78,000 76,000 -2.56% 2.96%
N Lincolnshire 79,000 81,000 2.53% 3.15%
Richmondshire 27,000 28,000 3.70% 1.09%
Rotherham 116,000 116,000 0.00% 4.52%
Ryedale 27,000 33,000 22.22% 1.29%
Scarborough 47,000 48,000 2.13% 1.87%
Selby 31,000 34,000 9.68% 1.32%
Sheffield 276,000 280,000 1.45% 10.90%
Wakefield 153,000 154,000 0.65% 6.00%
York 113,000 111,000 -1.77% 4.32%
Region Total 2,552,000 2,568,000 0.63% 100.00%
Source Nomis; ONS
Note: Data is reported quite a few years out of date (2008 = 2005)
Indicator TH12 Entrepreneurship, Innovation and New Business Formation
Indicator TH12E Business start ups
Policy Reference E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive Regional Economy
AMR 2008
VAT Registrations by region, 1994 - 2007 (per 10,000 resident adults)
Region 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
UK 36 35 36 39 39 38 38 36 37
East Midlands 33 32 33 35 35 34 35 34 35
East of England 39 38 39 44 41 40 41 39 41
London 57 56 58 64 67 64 63 57 56
North East 22 20 20 20 20 21 21 20 21
North West 31 30 30 33 33 32 32 31 32
South East 44 42 43 48 47 45 45 42 44
South West 38 35 37 41 40 39 39 36 39
West Midlands 33 32 32 35 35 35 35 34 35
Y&H 30 28 29 30 30 30 31 29 31
Source: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Guide to Business Start-ups and Closures Tables 1a-1e: UK, Country, Governmen
Table 1e: VAT registrations, de-registrations and start of year stock per 10,000 resi
the United Kingdom, and for each Country, Government Office Region, County and
AMR2008 Analysis Data
Region 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
UK 36 35 36 39 39 38 38 36 37
Y&H 30 28 29 30 30 30 31 29 31
Source: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Guide to Business Start-ups and Closures Tables 1a-1e: UK, Country, Governmen
Table 1e: VAT registrations, de-registrations and start of year stock per 10,000 resi
the United Kingdom, and for each Country, Government Office Region, County and
s Formation
nal Economy
10,000 resident adults)
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
40 38 37 37 42
38 36 35 35 37
43 40 40 39 43
60 59 57 57 68
24 22 22 22 28
35 33 33 32 37
47 44 43 43 48
41 38 37 37 40
37 36 34 34 36
34 32 32 31 35
a-1e: UK, Country, Government Office Region, County and District Analysis
art of year stock per 10,000 resident adults for
ment Office Region, County and District 1994-
a
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
40 38 37 37 42
34 32 31 31 35
a-1e: UK, Country, Government Office Region, County and District Analysis
art of year stock per 10,000 resident adults for
ment Office Region, County and District 1994-
Indicator TH13 Contribution to the Economy from Cities and Urban Areas
Indicator HT5 / Core Amount of completed retail, office and leisure development in Regional Centres, Sub Regional C
Indicator BD1 Principal Service Centres compared to total developed in the the region.
Policy Reference YH4: Regional cities and sub regional cities and towns,
AMR 2008
Employment Completions in the Settlement Network (Gross Internal Floorspace)
Amount of Land Developed for Employment by Type, by Local Authority Area and by Sett
Settlement Name Type B1 B2
Local Authority 1a 1b 1c
Barnsley Barnsley SRTC 2371 3957
Cudworth PT
Goldthorpe PT
Hoyland PT 158
Penistone PT
Wombwell PT
Rest of LA RLA 4420 8763
Bradford Bradford RC 12956 4559
Ilkley PT 1940 3052
Keighley PT 1945
Rest of LA RLA
Calderdale* Halifax SRTC
Brighouse PT
Rest of LA RLA
Craven Skipton PT NM NM NM NM
Rest of LA RLA
Doncaster Doncaster SRTC
Thorne PT
Mexborough PT
Rest of LA RLA 2392 6145
East Riding Bridlington PT 476 0 712
Beverley PT 0
Driffield PT 0 1552
Goole PT 0 337
Rest of LA RLA 3594 0 38292 6499
Hambleton Northallerton PT NM NM NM NM
Thirsk PT
Rest of LA RLA
Harrogate* Harrogate SRTC
Knaresborough PT
Ripon PT
Rest of LA
Hull Hull RC 5740 525 1147
Kirklees Huddersfield SRTC 1378 0 285 2835
Batley PT 0 0 0 150
Dewsbury PT 2410 0 1027 5109
Holmfirth PT 34 0 0 177
Rest of LA RLA 3200 0 926 5533
Leeds Leeds RC 43680
Wetherby PT 490
Rest of LA RLA 27190 60 9440
NE Lincs Grimsby SRTC 0 0 553 2681
Rest of LA RLA 1402 0 0 5699
Nth Lincs Scunthorpe SRTC 58 0 1351 2192
Rest of LA RLA 3014 0 0 2533
North York Moors Rest of Park NP 780 0 951 86
Richmondshire Richmond PT NM NM NM NM
Rest of LA RLA
Rotherham Rotherham SRTC 2792 1565 1673 405
Dinnington PT 1234 1747 1747 2055
Rest of LA RLA 2233 2113 2113 4019
Ryedale Malton PT
Rest of LA RLA 608 0 0 3738
Scarborough Scarborough SRTC 291
Whitby PT 73
Rest of LA RLA 5873 0 0
Selby Selby PT 36
Rest of LA RLA 119
Sheffield* Sheffield RC
Stocksbridge PT
Chapeltown PT
Rest of LA RLA
Wakefield Wakefield SRTC 3852 0 0 0
Castleford PT 1804 0 0 853
Pontefract PT
Rest of LA RLA 0 0 0 0
York York SRTC 9536 69 2245 8084
Rest of LA RLA
Yorkshire Dales Rest of Park NP 302 0 0 0
Total Regional Cities 62376 0 525 5706
Sub Regional Cities & Towns 19987 1634 6107 20445
Principal Towns 8655 1747 3823 14893
National Parks 1082 0 951 86
Rest of Local Authority 53926 2113 41391 52488
Total 146026 5494 52798 93617
Source Local Authority Audit 2008
Notes: * Indicates where Calderdale, Harrogate and Sheffield have not separated data, and only provided figure
B1a B1b B1c B2
Harrogate: 8633 0 2044 513
Sheffield 41437 0 0 6250
Calderdale 1431 0 0 4116
Figures for Calderdale. Harrogate, Sheffield not included within totals
Doncaster has added Air Related Use within total - 894sqm
Doncaster
Indicator TH13 Contribution to the Economy from Cities and Urba
onal Centres, Sub Regional Centres and Indicator HT6 / Core
gion. Indicator BD4 Amount of retail, office and leisure development in
Policy Reference YH4: Regional cities and sub regional cities and to
AMR 2008
nternal Floorspace) Completed floorspce in the Settlement Netw
al Authority Area and by Settlement Type
B8 Mixed Use Total Local Authority Settlement Name Type
B2/B8
2122 7132 15582 Barnsley* Barnsley SRTC
0 Cudworth PT
0 Goldthorpe PT
22758 22916 Hoyland PT
347 347 Penistone PT
0 Wombwell PT
2724 42494 58401 Rest of LA RLA
5064 22579 Bradford# Bradford RC
4992 Ilkley PT
1945 Keighley PT
0 Rest of LA RLA
Calderdale** Halifax SRTC
Brighouse PT
Rest of LA RLA
NM NM NM Craven Skipton PT
0 Rest of LA RLA
0 Doncaster** Doncaster SRTC
0 Thorne PT
0 Mexborough PT
22064 18207 49702 Rest of LA RLA
0 1188 East Riding Bridlington PT
0 Beverley PT
1552 Driffield PT
337 Goole PT
1185 49570 Rest of LA RLA
NM NM NM Hambleton Northallerton PT
0 Thirsk PT
0 Rest of LA RLA
Harrogate** Harrogate SRTC
Knaresborough PT
Ripon PT
Rest of LA RLA
12425 12144 31981 Hull Hull RC
2368 0 6866 Kirklees*** Huddersfield SRTC
1817 0 1967 Batley PT
7594 0 16140 Dewsbury PT
0 0 211 Holmfirth PT
5035 0 14694 Rest of LA RLA
43680 Leeds Leeds RC
280 770 Wetherby PT
15600 52290 Rest of LA RLA
233 1627 5094 NE Lincs Grimsby SRTC
0 3125 10226 Rest of LA RLA
34061 0 37662 Nth Lincs Scunthorpe SRTC
2540 0 8087 Rest of LA RLA
537 0 2354 North York Moors Rest of Park NP
NM NM NM Richmondshire Richmond PT
Rest of LA RLA
445 4952 11832 Rotherham Rotherham SRTC
0 6301 13084 Dinnington PT
101983 8449 120910 Rest of LA RLA
0 Ryedale Malton PT
2293 0 6639 Rest of LA RLA
291 Scarborough Scarborough SRTC
73 Whitby PT
2427 797 9097 Rest of LA RLA
36 Selby Selby PT
603 36920 37642 Rest of LA RLA
Sheffield** Sheffield RC
Stocksbridge PT
Chapeltown PT
Rest of LA RLA
0 0 3852 Wakefield Wakefield SRTC
0 13094 15751 Castleford PT
0 Pontefract PT
18077 17561 35638 Rest of LA RLA
1500 7645 29080 York York SRTC
0 Rest of LA RLA
411 0 713 Yorkshire Dales Rest of Park NP
17489 12144 98240 Total Regional Cities
Sub Regional
40729 21356 110258 Cities & Towns
10038 42153 81309 Principal Towns
948 0 3067 National Parks
174531 127553 452896 Rest of Local Authority
243735 203206 745770 Total
Source: Local Authority Audit 2008
d data, and only provided figures for whole LA: Notes: # Bradford data is for a 2 year period between 1.4.06
B8 Total *** Data for Kirklees is based on net not gross, with th
650 3207 * For Barnsley the area stated in rest of LA is sourced
67950 115637 Figures for Harrogate unable to be determined for AM
19796 25343 ** For Sheffield, Calderdale, and Doncaster data was
A1
Sheffield 8067
Caldedale
2391
he Economy from Cities and Urban Areas
office and leisure development in city and town centres
ties and sub regional cities and towns,
AMR 2008
d floorspce in the Settlement Network
A1 A2 B1a D2 Total
0 345 2463 2808
0
0
164 164
0
0
2065 2087 4152
12010 12010
0
455 455
-565 15478 14913
NM NM NM NM NM
0
0
0
0
2485 2485
144 0 176 0 320
281 0 0 0 281
0 0 0 0 0
135 289 0 0 424
4063 21 3895 539 8518
NM NM NM NM NM
40000 0 5740 0 45740
95 0 1378 0 1473
114 0 114
73 2410 2483
29 34 63
1567 3200 4767
2560 144 490 0 3194
0 100 43680 380 44160
4650 766 27190 11370 43976
191 22 0 0 213
12 18 1402 0 1432
183 0 58 125 366
0 0 722 3736 4458
NA NA NA NA NA
NM NM NM NM NM
180 0 2792 0 2972
0 0 1234 0 1234
168 0 2233 0 2401
0 0 0 0 0
524 15 716 0 1255
76 76
6102 6102
86 453 36 575
25 25
223 0 0 422 645
0 60 0 0 60
13 0 0 0 13
993 53 434 1155 2635
7279 601 6979 0 14859
0
204 0 302 509 1015
54570 144 6230 0 60944
8151 968 13670 547 23336
1330 902 47810 380 50422
204 0 302 509 1015
15962 873 63459 16825 97118
80217 2887 131471 18261 232835
for a 2 year period between 1.4.06 and 31.3.08 - And 15478 is
es is based on net not gross, with the exception of B1a Use
area stated in rest of LA is sourced from Barnsley AMR data return
ate unable to be determined for AMR 2008
alderdale, and Doncaster data was not broken down by settlement.
A2 B1a D2 Total
8067
1487 1487
Indicator TH14 Contribution to the Economy from Rural Indicator TH14 Contribution to the Eco
Areas Rural Areas
Indicator TH14A Percentage change in economic activity Indicator TH14B Rural income deprivati
and employment rates in rural areas.
E1: Creating a Succesful and Competitive E1: Creating a Succesf
Policy Reference Regional Economy Policy Reference Competitive Regional E
NOT MONITORED NOT MONITORED
Contribution to the Economy from Indicator TH14 Contribution to the Economy from
Rural Areas Rural Areas
Rural income deprivation Indicator TH14C GVA from rural towns as a
percentage of Local Authority GVA
and regional GVA
E1: Creating a Succesful and E1: Creating a Succesful and
Competitive Regional Economy Policy Reference Competitive Regional Economy
NOT MONITORED
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in RSS) Indicator as Listed in 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of
RSS text REF in 2008 Response
E2 Town Centres and City and town centre are the focus Development in Town TH15/BD4
Major Facilities for the services and activities which Centres
generate a high level of people
movement.
Vibrant and successful town Health of Town Centres TH16
centres have been developed in
the region.
In AMR or AMR Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Data CD Chapter REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
Amount of completed HT6/BD1 Y AVERAGE AMR/CD Chapter 2
retail, office and leisure
development respectively
Number of LA's to have TH16A Y AVERAGE CD Chapter 2
completed town centre
health checks.
Improvements to Town TH16B Y AVERAGE CD Chapter 2
Centre Health
Indicator TH15 /
Core Indicator BD4 Development in Town Centres
Indicator HT6 / Core
Indicator BD4 Amount of retail, office and leisure development in city and town centres
Policy Reference YH4: Regional cities and sub regional cities and towns,
YH5: Principal Towns,
YH7: Location of Development,
E1: Creating and Successful and Competitive Regional Economy,
E2: Town Centres and Major Facilities
AMR 2008
Amount of retail, office and leisure development in city and town centres
Percentage within
Local Authority A1 A2 B1a D2 Total developed town centres
Barnsley 2065 345 4714 0 7124 31.61
Bradford 11900 15478 27378 29.31
Calderdale 1487 1487 NM
Craven NM NM NM NM NM NM
Doncaster 2485 2485 NM
East Riding 4623 310 4071 539 9543 0.10
Hambleton NM NM NM NM NM NM
Harrogate
Hull* 40000 0 5740 0 45740 100.00
Kirklees 1878 0 7022 8900 53.56
Leeds 7210 1010 71360 11750 91330 0.56
NE Lincolnshire 203 40 1402 0 1644 0
N Lincolnshire 183 0 780 3861 4824 0.00
North York Moors 2377 2377 0.00
Richmondshire NM NM NM NM NM NM
Rotherham 348 0 6259 0 6607 0.03
Ryedale 524 15 716 0 1255 0.00
Scarborough 0 0 6178 0 6178 1.23
Selby 86 453 36 25 600
Sheffield 8067 41437 0 49504 0.47
Wakefield 1229 113 434 1577 3353 21.71
York 7279 601 6979 0 14859 41.41
Yorkshire Dales 204 0 302 509 1015 16.45
Total 88283 2886 176773 18261 286203
Source: Local Authority Audit 2008
Notes: Hull - A1 data is only monitored within the town centre and not the LA area as a whole
Figures for Harrogate unable to be determined for AMR 2008
Indicator TH16 Health of Town Centres
Indicator TH16A Number of LA's to have completed town centre health checks.
Indicator TH16B Improvements to Town Centre Health
AMR 2008
Local Authority Settlement Name Type Has a town centre Date of health
health check been check
Barnsley Barnsley SRTC None undertaken NA
Cudworth PT
Goldthorpe PT
Hoyland PT
Penistone PT
Wombwell PT
Rest of LA RLA
Bradford Bradford* RC Yes Jun-08
Ilkley PT Yes Jun-08
Keighley PT Yes Jun-08
Rest of LA* RLA Yes (2) Jul-08
Calderdale Halifax SRTC
Brighouse PT
Rest of LA RLA
Craven Skipton PT Yes Aug-04
Rest of LA RLA Yes (4) Aug-04
Doncaster Doncaster* SRTC Yes Jul-08
Thorne PT Yes Feruary 2007
Mexborough PT Yes Feruary 2007
Rest of LA* RLA
East Riding Bridlington PT Yes 2008
Beverley PT Yes 2008
Driffield PT Yes 2008
Goole PT Yes 2008
Rest of LA RLA Yes (7) 2008
Hambleton Northallerton PT NM NM
Thirsk PT
Rest of LA RLA
Harrogate Harrogate SRTC
Knaresborough PT
Ripon PT
Rest of LA RLA
Hull Hull RC None undertaken NA
Kirklees Huddersfield SRTC Yes Sep-07
Batley PT Yes Mar-08
Dewsbury PT Yes Dec-07
Holmfirth PT Yes Oct-07
Rest of LA RLA Yes (2) Oct-07
Leeds Leeds RC Yes: City Centre Sep-07
Wetherby PT Yes 2006
Rest of LA RLA
NE Lincs Grimsby SRTC Yes Feb-08
Rest of LA RLA
Nth Lincs Scunthorpe SRTC Yes Aug-05
Rest of LA RLA Yes (5) Aug-05
North York Moors Rest of Park NP None undertaken
Richmondshire Richmond PT NM
Rest of LA RLA
Rotherham Rotherham SRTC No
Dinnington PT
Rest of LA RLA
Ryedale Malton PT Yes 2006
Rest of LA RLA Yes (3) 2006
Scarborough Scarborough SRTC NM NM
Whitby PT
Rest of LA RLA
Selby Selby PT Yes 2002
Rest of LA RLA
Sheffield Sheffield RC Yes 2007
Stocksbridge PT Yes 2003
Chapeltown PT Yes 2003
Rest of LA RLA
Wakefield Wakefield SRTC Yes Apr-07
Castleford PT
Pontefract PT
Rest of LA RLA
York York SRTC Yes Jun-07
Rest of LA RLA
Yorkshire Dales Rest of Park NP NA NA
Total Regional Cities
Sub Regional Cities & Towns
Principal Towns
National Parks
Rest of Local Authority
Total
Source Local Authority Audit 2008
.
2008
Improvements carried out
NA
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Will be used to inform LDF
NM
NA
The health check contributes to the decision making processes in
assigning regeneration funds. The town has recently been subject to a
Local Public Service Agreement which used the data to guide the design
and monitor the impact of specific improvement works.
Additional pedestrianised street in town centre
None
None
Not aware of any
Not aware of any
NM
None
Health checks have contibuted to justification for permitting a large
retail development
No
No
Yes
NA
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in RSS) Indicator as Listed in 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or
RSS text REF in 2008 Response Data CD
E3 Land and A continuous and adequate Employment Land TH17/BD3
Premises for supply of appropriate Supply by Type
Economic employment land has been
Development provided in the region to
support regional economic
development.
The Regional TH18
Employment Land
Portfolio
AMR Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Chapter REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
Percentage of employment land TH17A Y GOOD CD Chapter 5
completions on previously developed
land
Amount of land developed for HT5 Y GOOD AMR/CD Chapter 2 &
employment by type by LA and 3
settlement type.
Has an employment land review TH18A Y GOOD CD Chapter 2 &
been undertaken/updated for each 3
LA, on which LDF strategy is based?
Indicator TH17 / Core
Indicator BD3 Employment Land Supply by Type
Indicator TH17A / Percentage of employment land completions on
Core Indicator BD2 previously developed land
Policy Reference E3: Land and Premises for Economic Development
AMR 2008
Completed floorspace on previously developed land, 2008
Total completed Total completed % completed
Local Authority floorspace sq/m floorspace on PDL floorspace on PDL
Barnsley 97,246.0 68,441.4 70%
Bradford 29,516.0 26,632.0 90%
Calderdale 25,343.0 25,387.0 100%
Craven NM 1.0 100%
Doncaster 48,808.0 21,904.0 45%
East Riding 52,648.0 13,189.4 25%
Hambleton NM NM 5%
Harrogate 11,858.0 8,664.1 73%
Hull 31,981.0 27,030.0 85%
Kirklees 39,878.0 32,106.0 81%
Leeds 96,740.0 63,590.0 66%
NE Lincolnshire 15,320.0 9,556.0 62%
N Lincolnshire 45,749.0 43,208.3 94%
North York Moors 2,354.0 773.0 33%
Richmondshire NM NM NM
Rotherham 145,826.0 122,611.0 84%
Ryedale 6,639.0 4,703.4 71%
Scarborough 9,461.0 NM 14%
Selby 37,678.0 37,678.0 100%
Sheffield 115,637.0 NM NM
Wakefield 55,241.0 21,347.0 39%
York 29,080.1 18,195.9 63%
Yorkshire Dales 713.0 50.0 7%
Total 897,716.1 545,067.4 61%
Source: Local Authority 2008 Audit
Notes: 1 calculation based on external floorspace
2 this is based on employment allocations data
Indicator TH17 / Core
Indicator BD3 Employment Land Supply by Type
Indicator TH17A /
Core Indicator BD2 Percentage of employment land completions on previously developed land
Policy Reference E3 Land and Premises for Economic Development
AMR 2008
Completed floorspace on previously developed land, 2005 - 2008
Local Authority 2005 2006 2007 2008
Barnsley 51% 93% 94% 70%
Bradford 20% 86% 100% 90%
Calderdale 100% 100% 100% 100%
Craven N/M N/M N/M 100%
Doncaster 84% 40% 14% 45%
East Riding 92% 99% 94% 25%
Hambleton 0% 0% 0% 5%
Harrogate 90% 74% 89% 73%
Hull 0% 100% 60% 85%
Kirklees 76% 97% 75% 81%
Leeds 69% 85% 62% 66%
NE Lincolnshire 22% 57% 15% 62%
N Lincolnshire 100% 81% 96% 94%
North York Moors 22% 1% 33%
Richmondshire 0% 0% N/M NM
Rotherham 97% 83% 97% 84%
Ryedale 100% 0% 11% 71%
Scarborough 63% 73% 100% 14%
Selby 0% 10% 100% 100%
Sheffield 94% 82% 94% NM
Wakefield 34% 39% 45% 39%
York 59% 58% 52% 63%
Yorkshire Dales N/A N/A 48% 7%
Y&H Total 67% 62% 58% 61%
Source: Local Authority 2008 Audit
Notes: * 4 year average
Indicator TH17 /
Core Indicator BD3 Employment Land Supply by Type
Indicator HT5 / Amount of completed retail, office and leisure development
Core Indicator BD1 Principal Service Centres compared to total developed in th
Policy Reference E3: Land and Premises for Economic Development
AMR 2008
Employment Completions in the Settlement Network (G
Amount of Land Developed for Employment by Type, by
Settlement Name Type B1
Local Authority 1a
Barnsley Barnsley SRTC 2371
Cudworth PT
Goldthorpe PT
Hoyland PT 158
Penistone PT
Wombwell PT
Rest of LA RLA 4420
Bradford Bradford RC 12956
Ilkley PT 1940
Keighley PT
Rest of LA RLA
Calderdale* Halifax SRTC
Brighouse PT
Rest of LA RLA
Craven Skipton PT NM
Rest of LA RLA
Doncaster Doncaster SRTC
Thorne PT
Mexborough PT
Rest of LA RLA 2392
East Riding Bridlington PT 476
Beverley PT
Driffield PT
Goole PT
Rest of LA RLA 3594
Hambleton Northallerton PT NM
Thirsk PT
Rest of LA RLA
Harrogate* Harrogate SRTC
Knaresborough PT
Ripon PT
Rest of LA
veloped land Hull Hull RC 5740
Kirklees Huddersfield SRTC 1378
Batley PT 0
Dewsbury PT 2410
Holmfirth PT 34
Rest of LA RLA 3200
Leeds Leeds RC 43680
008 Wetherby PT 490
Rest of LA RLA 27190
% Average NE Lincs Grimsby SRTC 0
2005 to 2008 Rest of LA RLA 1402
Nth Lincs Scunthorpe SRTC 58
77% Rest of LA RLA 3014
74% North York Moors Rest of Park NP 780
100% Richmondshire Richmond PT NM
NM Rest of LA RLA
46% Rotherham Rotherham SRTC 2792
77% Dinnington PT 1234
NM Rest of LA RLA 2233
NM Ryedale Malton PT
61% Rest of LA RLA 608
82% Scarborough Scarborough SRTC
71% Whitby PT 73
39% Rest of LA RLA 5873
93% Selby Selby PT 36
14% Rest of LA RLA
NM Sheffield* Sheffield RC
90% Stocksbridge PT
45% Chapeltown PT
63% Rest of LA RLA
53% Wakefield Wakefield SRTC 3852
NM Castleford PT 1804
39% Pontefract PT
58% Rest of LA RLA 0
NM York York SRTC 9536
62% Rest of LA RLA
Yorkshire Dales Rest of Park NP 302
Total Regional Cities 62376
Sub Regional Cities & Towns 19987
Principal Towns 8655
National Parks 1082
Rest of Local Authority 53926
Total 146026
Source Local Authority Audit 2008
Notes: * Indicates where Calderdale, Harrogate and Sheffield have not
B1a
Harrogate: 8633
Sheffield 41437
Calderdale 1431
Figures for Calderdale. Harrogate, Sheffield not included within
Doncaster has added Air Related Use within total - 894sqm
Doncaster
Indicator TH17 /
by Type Core Indicator BD3
, office and leisure development in Regional Centres, Sub Regional Centres and Indicator HT5 / Core
ompared to total developed in the the region. Indicator BD1
Economic Development Policy Reference
AMR 2008
ons in the Settlement Network (Gross Internal Floorspace) Complete
oped for Employment by Type, by Local Authority Area and by Settlement Type
B1 B2 B8 Mixed Use Total Local Authority
1b 1c B2/B8
3957 2122 7132 15582 Barnsley*
0
0
22758 22916
347 347
0
8763 2724 42494 58401
4559 5064 22579 Bradford#
3052 4992
1945 1945
0
Calderdale**
NM NM NM NM NM NM Craven
0
0 Doncaster**
0
0
6145 22064 18207 49702
0 712 0 1188 East Riding
0 0
0 1552 1552
0 337 337
0 38292 6499 1185 49570
NM NM NM NM NM NM Hambleton
0
0
Harrogate**
525 1147 12425 12144 31981 Hull
0 285 2835 2368 0 6866 Kirklees***
0 0 150 1817 0 1967
0 1027 5109 7594 0 16140
0 0 177 0 0 211
0 926 5533 5035 0 14694
43680 Leeds
280 770
60 9440 15600 52290
0 553 2681 233 1627 5094 NE Lincs
0 0 5699 0 3125 10226
0 1351 2192 34061 0 37662 Nth Lincs
0 0 2533 2540 0 8087
0 951 86 537 0 2354 North York Moors
NM NM NM NM NM NM Richmondshire
1565 1673 405 445 4952 11832 Rotherham
1747 1747 2055 0 6301 13084
2113 2113 4019 101983 8449 120910
0 Ryedale
0 0 3738 2293 0 6639
291 291 Scarborough
73
0 0 2427 797 9097
36 Selby
119 603 36920 37642
Sheffield**
0 0 0 0 0 3852 Wakefield
0 0 853 0 13094 15751
0
0 0 0 18077 17561 35638
69 2245 8084 1500 7645 29080 York
0
0 0 0 411 0 713 Yorkshire Dales
0 525 5706 17489 12144 98240 Total
1634 6107 20445 40729 21356 110258
1747 3823 14893 10038 42153 81309
0 951 86 948 0 3067
2113 41391 52488 174531 127553 452896
5494 52798 93617 243735 203206 745770
Source:
, Harrogate and Sheffield have not separated data, and only provided figures for whole LA: Notes:
B1b B1c B2 B8 Total
0 2044 513 650 3207
0 0 6250 67950 115637
0 0 4116 19796 25343
gate, Sheffield not included within totals
ated Use within total - 894sqm
2391
Employment Land Supply by Type
Amount of completed retail, office and leisure development in Regional
Centres, Sub Regional Centres and Principal Service Centres compared to total
developed in the the region.
E3: Land and Premises for Economic Development
AMR 2008
Completed floorspce in the Settlement Network
Settlement Type A1 A2 B1a D2 Total
Name
Barnsley SRTC 0 345 2463 2808
Cudworth PT 0
Goldthorpe PT 0
Hoyland PT 164 164
Penistone PT 0
Wombwell PT 0
Rest of LA RLA 2065 2087 4152
Bradford RC 12010 12010
Ilkley PT 0
Keighley PT 455 455
Rest of LA RLA -565 15478 14913
Halifax SRTC
Brighouse PT
Rest of LA RLA
Skipton PT NM NM NM NM NM
Rest of LA RLA 0
Doncaster SRTC 0
Thorne PT 0
Mexborough PT 0
Rest of LA RLA 2485 2485
Bridlington PT 144 0 176 0 320
Beverley PT 281 0 0 0 281
Driffield PT 0 0 0 0 0
Goole PT 135 289 0 0 424
Rest of LA RLA 4063 21 3895 539 8518
Northallerton PT NM NM NM NM NM
Thirsk PT
Rest of LA RLA
Harrogate SRTC
Knaresborough PT
Ripon PT
Rest of LA RLA
Hull RC 40000 0 5740 0 45740
Huddersfield SRTC 95 0 1378 0 1473
Batley PT 114 0 114
Dewsbury PT 73 2410 2483
Holmfirth PT 29 34 63
Rest of LA RLA 1567 3200 4767
Leeds RC 2560 144 490 0 3194
Wetherby PT 0 100 43680 380 44160
Rest of LA RLA 4650 766 27190 11370 43976
Grimsby SRTC 191 22 0 0 213
Rest of LA RLA 12 18 1402 0 1432
Scunthorpe SRTC 183 0 58 125 366
Rest of LA RLA 0 0 722 3736 4458
Rest of Park NP NA NA NA NA NA
Richmond PT NM NM NM NM NM
Rest of LA RLA
Rotherham SRTC 180 0 2792 0 2972
Dinnington PT 0 0 1234 0 1234
Rest of LA RLA 168 0 2233 0 2401
Malton PT 0 0 0 0 0
Rest of LA RLA 524 15 716 0 1255
Scarborough SRTC
Whitby PT 76 76
Rest of LA RLA 6102 6102
Selby PT 86 453 36 575
Rest of LA RLA 25 25
Sheffield RC
Stocksbridge PT
Chapeltown PT
Rest of LA RLA
Wakefield SRTC 223 0 0 422 645
Castleford PT 0 60 0 0 60
Pontefract PT 13 0 0 0 13
Rest of LA RLA 993 53 434 1155 2635
York SRTC 7279 601 6979 0 14859
Rest of LA RLA 0
Rest of Park NP 204 0 302 509 1015
Regional Cities 54570 144 6230 0 60944
Sub Regional
Cities & Towns 8151 968 13670 547 23336
Principal Towns 1330 902 47810 380 50422
National Parks 204 0 302 509 1015
Rest of Local Authority 15962 873 63459 16825 97118
Total 80217 2887 131471 18261 232835
Local Authority Audit 2008
# Bradford data is for a 2 year period between 1.4.06 and 31.3.08 - And 15478 is
*** Data for Kirklees is based on net not gross, with the exception of B1a Use
* For Barnsley the area stated in rest of LA is sourced from Barnsley AMR data return
Figures for Harrogate unable to be determined for AMR 2008
** For Sheffield, Calderdale, and Doncaster data was not broken down by settlement.
A1 A2 B1a D2 Total
Sheffield 8067 8067
Caldedale 1487 1487
Indicator TH17 / Core
Indicator BD3 Employment Land Supply by Type
Amount of completed retail, office and leisure development in Regional
Indicator HT5 / Core Centres, Sub Regional Centres and Principal Service Centres compared
Indicator BD1 to total developed in the the region.
Policy Reference E3: Land and Premises for Economic Development
2008
Yorkshire and Humber Settlement Network - Employment Completions and Losses, 2007/2008
Network B1 B2 B8 Mixed Use Total
1a 1b 1c B2/B8
Regional Cities 62376 0 525 5706 17489 12144 98240
Sub Regional Cities & Towns 19987 1634 6107 20445 40729 21356 110258
Principal Towns 8655 1747 3823 14893 10038 42153 81309
National Parks 1082 0 951 86 948 0 3067
Rest of Local Authority 53926 2113 41391 52488 174531 127553 452896
Total 146026 5494 52798 93617 243735 203206 745770
Source Local Authority Audit 2008
Indicator TH17 / Core
Indicator BD3 Employment Land Supply by Type
Indicator TH21 Employment Land Available - By Type
Policy Reference E3: Land and Premises for Economic Development
AMR 2008
es, 2007/2008
Employment Land Available - By Type
% of Total Local Authority B1 B2 B8
13.17% Barnsley* Not Monitored by Type
14.78% Bradford* Not Monitored by Type
Calderdale** 16.25 66.9 22.25
10.90% Craven* Not Monitored by Type
0.41% Doncaster 38.44 0 11.43
60.73% East Riding* Not Monitored by Type
Hambleton NM NM NM
100.00% Harrogate 1.84 0.42 0.8
Hull* 0 0 0
Kirklees 15.62 21.15 0
Leeds 333.19 242.76 172.45
NE Lincolnshire* Not Monitored by Type
N Lincolnshire 362.735 290.0336 342.353
North York Moors 6.78 0
Richmondshire NM NM NM
Rotherham* Not Monitored by Type
Ryedale* Not Monitored by Type
Scarborough 4.55 0.7 0.07
Selby 229.39 41.42 13.41
Sheffield*** NM NM NM
Wakefield 46.12 22.79 34.58
York 20.85 4.18 2.38
Yorkshire Dales* Not Monitored by Type
Total 1075.765 690.3536 599.723
Source: Local Authority 2008 Audit
Notes:
* not stated by type. Within the Yorkshire Dales 0.35ha are designated for B1 use, but the re
** a further 100.58ha of allocated employment land available as part of the adopted UDP (bu
*** For Sheffield thr following data was provided in relation to this indicator
Sheffield B1a B1b, B1c, B2 and B8
45.47-83.86 187.17-261.54
AMR 2008
Core Indicator BD3 Change in Employment land available, by typ
Year B1 B2 B8
2005 860 747 571
2006 726 1079 644
2007 597.41 375.79 307.93
2008 1075.765 690.3536 599.723
% Change (05 - 07) 25% -8% 5%
Source: Local Authority 2005 - 2008 Audit
e
c Development
2008
Available - By Type
Mixed Use B2 and B8 Total
red by Type 66.99
red by Type 170.67
0 105.4
red by Type 4.372
216.57 266.44
red by Type 474.5
NM 34
NM 3.06
0 157.52
56.15 92.92
0 748.4
red by Type 612.08
0 995.1216
0 6.78
NM NM
red by Type 249
red by Type 3.03
19.48 24.8
129.79 24.8
NM NM
253.63 357.12
5 32.41
red by Type 7.63
680.62 4437.0436
nated for B1 use, but the remaining amount is for all uses
part of the adopted UDP (but not allocated to specific use class.
2008
ment land available, by type 2005 - 2008
Total
Mixed Use (B2 and B8)
N/M 4992
N/M 5245
502.37 4219.018
680.62 4437.044
N/A -11%
Indicator TH18 The Regional Employment Land Portfolio
Policy Reference E3: Land and Premises for Economic Development
AMR 2008
Employment Land Review
Local Authority Assessment Undertaken Date of Assessment
Barnsley Yes 2004
Bradford Yes Dec-07
Calderdale Yes Oct-08
Craven Yes Aug-08
Doncaster No
East Riding Yes Ongoing
Hambleton No
Harrogate Yes Jan-06
Hull Yes Mar-08
Kirklees Yes Apr-07
Leeds Yes Apr-06
NE Lincs Yes
Nth Lincs Yes
North York Moors No
Richmondshire Yes Jan-07
Rotherham Yes May-07
Ryedale Yes April 2006
Scarborough Yes May-06
Selby Yes Jul-07
Sheffield Yes
Wakefield Yes 2005/2006
York No
Yorkshire Dales No
Source: Local Authority Audit 2008
olio
Development
AMR 2008
Employment Land Review
Comments
Review not assessed in SHLAA as yet
Final Report Due October 2008
Work on the SHLAA commenced during the 07/08 monitoring year
Work in progress, due to be published Oct 2008
Parts 1 and 2 of The Review have been undertaken the 3rd part will continue to be updated
until the Prefered Options stage of the DPD regarding employment.
No immeidate plans to undertake
April 2008 update to be completed by end of October 2008.
April 2006 onwards, still in progress.
Yes - currently awaiting final publication.
Used to aid allocation of new employment sites in the Housing and Employment DPD
Preferred Options document. Review to be finalised and published in October 2008.
Refresh of the 2006 ELR being undertaken.
Carried out 2005/06 as part of Employment Technical Paper
Similar to the SHLAA, York has not as yet completed its ELR, work is at an advanced stage
and it is anticipated this will be finalised in Autumn 2008
Will form part of evidence base for Core Strategy
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in Indicator as Listed 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or
RSS) in RSS text REF in 2008 Response Data CD
E4 Support for Successful, sustainable Growth of Regional TH20
Regional Priority clusters have developed Industry Clusters
Sectors and Clusters and these have been
integrated with a
knowledge driven
economy.
AMR Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Chapter REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
Total employment change in TH11E N NA CD Chapter 3
employment by sectors
% Regional workforce employed TH12C N NA CD Chapter 3
in non-business class sectors
Research and development TH12A N NA CD Chapter 3
performed in UK Businesses
Indicator TH20 Growth of Regional Industry Clusters
Policy Reference E4: Support for Regional Priority Sectors and Clusters
AMR 2008
Employment and Output in Priority Sectors 1998-2007
Sector 1998 2007 % Annual Growth (98-07
FTE Output £m FTE Output £m FTE
Chemicals 31,090 1,740 20,205 1,702 -4.70%
Digital and New Media Industries 129,178 3,900 174,097 7,147 3.40%
Advanced Engineering and Materials 154,581 4,794 116,204 4,836 -3.10%
Food and Drink 64,183 2,628 49,681 2,468 -2.80%
Environmental Industries 169,038 6,458 215,672 7,778 2.70%
Healthcare 10,250 339 11,056 632 0.80%
Total 558,319 19,859 586,915 24,564 0.60%
Experian Business Strategies/ Yorkshire Forward Regional Econometric Model
Source: October 2008
Progress in the Region, 2008
Indicator TH20 Growth of Regional Industry Clusters
Indicator TH11E Total employment change in employment by sectors
rs
E4: Support for Regional Priority Sectors
Policy Reference and Clusters
% Annual Growth (98-07
Output £m NOT MONITORED
-0.20%
7.00%
0.10%
-0.70%
2.10%
7.10%
2.40%
al Econometric Model
Indicator TH20 Growth of Regional Industry Clusters
Indicator TH12C % Regional workforce employed in non-business class
sectors
E4: Support for Regional Priority Sectors
Policy Reference and Clusters
NOT MONITORED
Indicator TH20 Growth of Regional Industry Clusters
Indicator TH12A Research and development performed in UK
Businesses
E4: Support for Regional Priority Sectors
Policy Reference and Clusters
NOT MONITORED
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in RSS) Indicator as Listed in RSS 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of
text REF in 2008 Response
E5 Safeguarding Strategic employment sites Allocation in Local TH21 Y AVERAGE
Employment Land necessary to support the Plan's Development Frameworks
core strategy have been of Safeguarded
safeguarded and delivered. Employment Sites
In AMR or AMR Sub 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Data CD Chapter Indicator REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
CD Chapter 2, 3
and 5
Indicator TH21 Allocation in Local Development Frameworks of Safeguarded Employment Sites
Indicator TH17 / Core
Indicator BD3 Employment Land Available - By Type
Policy Reference E5: Safeguarding Employment Land
AMR 2008
Employment Land Available - By Type
Mixed Use B2 and
Local Authority B1 B2 B8 B8
Barnsley* Not Monitored by Type
Bradford* Not Monitored by Type
Calderdale** 16.25 66.9 22.25 0
Craven* Not Monitored by Type
Doncaster 38.44 0 11.43 216.57
East Riding* Not Monitored by Type
Hambleton NM NM NM NM
Harrogate 1.84 0.42 0.8 NM
Hull* 0 0 0 0
Kirklees 15.62 21.15 0 56.15
Leeds 333.19 242.76 172.45 0
NE Lincolnshire* Not Monitored by Type
N Lincolnshire 362.735 290.0336 342.353 0
North York Moors 6.78 0 0
Richmondshire NM NM NM NM
Rotherham* Not Monitored by Type
Ryedale* Not Monitored by Type
Scarborough 4.55 0.7 0.07 19.48
Selby 229.39 41.42 13.41 129.79
Sheffield*** NM NM NM NM
Wakefield 46.12 22.79 34.58 253.63
York 20.85 4.18 2.38 5
Yorkshire Dales* Not Monitored by Type
Total 1075.765 690.3536 599.723 680.62
Source: Local Authority 2008 Audit
Notes:
* not stated by type. Within the Yorkshire Dales 0.35ha are designated for B1 use, but the remaining amount is for all uses
** a further 100.58ha of allocated employment land available as part of the adopted UDP (but not allocated to specific use
*** For Sheffield thr following data was provided in relation to this indicator
Sheffield B1a B1b, B1c, B2 and B8
45.47-83.86 187.17-261.54
AMR 2008
Core Indicator BD3 Change in Employment land available, by type 2005 - 2008
Mixed Use (B2
and B8)
Year B1 B2 B8 Mixed Use (B2
and B8)
2005 860 747 571 N/M
2006 726 1079 644 N/M
2007 597.41 375.79 307.93 502.37
2008 1075.765 690.3536 599.723 680.62
% Change (05 - 07) 25% -8% 5% N/A
Source: Local Authority 2005 - 2008 Audit
ed Employment Sites
Total
66.99
170.67
105.4
4.372
266.44
474.5
34
3.06
157.52
92.92
748.4
612.08
995.1216
6.78
NM
249
3.03
24.8
24.8
NM
357.12
32.41
7.63
4437.0436
he remaining amount is for all uses
P (but not allocated to specific use
pe 2005 - 2008
Total
4992
5245
4219.018
4437.044
-11%
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in RSS) Indicator as Listed 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or
in RSS text REF in 2008 Response Data CD
E6 Sustainable Tourism Tourism has been recognised Contribution of TH22
and valued as a key component Tourism to the
of regional economic activity Regional Economy
making a significant contribution
to the local and regional
economy.
A diverse and sustainable Popularity of Visitor TH23 Y AVERAGE CD
tourism industry has developed Attractions in the
in the region. Region
Tourism has contributed to Tourism Related TH24 N NA NM
improving the local skills based Rural Diversification
and employment opportunities in
the region.
AMR Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Chapter REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
Tourism Employment TH22A Y GOOD AMR/CD Chapter 3
Tourism VAT TH22B Y GOOD AMR/CD Chapter 3
Registrations per 10,000
population / Vat
registrations by Region
Tourist visits to the TH22C Y GOOD CD Chapter 3
region by amount of
spend per visitor / LA
Chapter 3
Indicator TH22 Contribution of Tourism to the Regional Economy
Policy Reference E6: Sustainable Tourism
AMR 2008
Contribution of all Tourism to the regional economy, 2007 (millions)
Trips Nights Spending
Yorkshire and the Humber 10.35 30.12 1427
England 101.83 305.79 16432
Source: UK Tourist 2007, Tourism Volumes and Values in 2007
Bradford
Calderdale
Craven
Doncaster
East Riding of York
Hambleton
Harrogate
Kingston upon Hull
Kirklees
Leeds
North East Lincolns
North Lincolnshire
Richmondshire
Rotherham
Ryedale
Scarborough
Selby
Sheffield
Wakefield
York
Yorkshire and Hum
Source:
Notes:
Indicator TH22 Contribution of Tourism to the Regional Economy
Indicator TH22A Tourism Employment
Policy Reference E6: Sustainable Tourism
AMR 2008
% Working age in employment who work in - distribution, hotels an
January - December 2004 January - December 2005
Employed in Employed in
Local Authority Sector % of Workforce Sector % of Workforce
Barnsley 18,000 18.7 15,700 16.7
Bradford 44,300 22.4 39,900 19.9
Calderdale 16,800 19.2 14,900 17
Craven 5,600 22.2 5,100 19.6
Doncaster 24,600 20.2 24,900 20.1
East Riding of Yorkshire 25,200 17.6 28,300 19.1
Hambleton 9,000 21.4 7,900 19.1
Harrogate 16,400 21.7 15,200 19.9
Kingston upon Hull 21,500 20.9 22,000 22.1
Kirklees 36,900 20.6 38,400 21.1
Leeds 76,700 22.6 72,300 21.5
North East Lincolnshire 13,500 20.3 13,400 20.5
North Lincolnshire 13,300 19.3 14,400 20.9
Richmondshire 4,100 19 3,900 18.4
Rotherham 23,300 20.5 20,500 18.2
Ryedale 4,500 19.3 5,100 21.1
Scarborough 12,300 28.1 10,100 21.6
Selby 6,900 18.7 7,700 20.5
Sheffield 37,700 17.2 35,300 15.5
Wakefield 33,200 22.1 29,100 19.7
York 20,300 22.6 19,400 21.7
Yorkshire and Humber 464,100 20.7 443,700 19.7
Source: NOMIS Annual Population Survey; January 2004 - December 2007
Notes: Total workforce is derived using all people of working age (aged 16 - 59/64)
Data from the period Apr 05 - Mar 06has been reweighted in line with the latest ONS estimates - this
AMR 2008
ent who work in - distribution, hotels and restaurants
January - December 2006 January - December 2007 % Change 2004 - 2007
Employed in Employed in
Sector % of Workforce Sector % of Workforce Employed in Sector
17,100 18.1 17,500 18.0 -3%
42,400 20.4 49,300 23.6 11%
14,600 15.9 13,900 15.2 -17%
4,600 17.5 4,300 16.4 -23%
24,600 19.9 26,000 20.4 6%
30,300 19.6 24,200 15.6 -4%
10,200 26.0 8,800 22.5 -2%
14,800 19.6 12,900 16.7 -21%
23,800 21.9 22,400 20.5 4%
32,200 17.6 33,800 18.1 -8%
77,400 20.6 69,700 19.1 -9%
15,300 21.8 17,500 24.8 30%
14,800 20.3 14,900 20.4 12%
2,900 12.1 3,700 16.5 -10%
20,000 18.0 21,800 19.6 -6%
3,200 13.9 4,600 20.6 2%
17,100 38.6 10,900 26.0 -11%
6,100 17.4 5,900 15.6 -14%
41,500 18.3 48,600 20.5 29%
31,600 20.8 36,200 24.8 9%
21,500 22.1 21,900 22.6 8%
465,700 19.9 468,700 20.0 0.3%
aged 16 - 59/64)
in line with the latest ONS estimates - this has meant AMR2008 has amended figures found in AMR2007
Indicator TH22 Contribution of Tourism to the Regional Economy
Indicator TH22B Tourism VAT Registrations per 10,000 population / VAT registrations by Region
Policy Reference E6: Sustainable Tourism
AMR 2008
Tourism VAT Registrations per 10,000 population
Sub Region 2004 2005 2006 2007 % Change
2006-2007
Humber
EROYC 110 100 135 120 -11%
Hull 80 70 75 75 0%
NE Lincolnshire 35 30 30 30 0%
N Lincolnshire 55 65 45 45 0%
North Yorkshire 310 280 280 265 -5%
Craven 30 25 25 25 0%
Hambleton 35 30 40 40 0%
Harrogate 70 70 80 65 -19%
Richmondshire 30 25 15 15 0%
Ryedale 35 35 25 25 0%
Scarborough 80 65 65 60 -8%
Selby 35 25 30 30 0%
York UA 65 65 45 45 0%
South Yorkshire 370 350 290 295 2%
Barnsley 60 60 50 45 -10%
Doncaster 80 75 85 85 0%
Rotherham 55 65 50 55 10%
Sheffield 175 145 105 110 5%
West Yorkshire 690 610 620 605 -2%
Bradford 135 125 130 135 4%
Calderdale 85 75 75 65 -13%
Kirklees 130 120 125 125 0%
Leeds 225 195 195 195 0%
Wakefield 110 100 95 85 -11%
Yorkshire and Humber 1,720 1,565 1,525 1,485 -3%
Source: BERR Enterprise Directorate Analytical Unit
Use of Standard Industrial Classification Code H - Hotels and Restuarants as proxy for
Tourism
http://stats.berr.gov.uk/ed/vat/VATStatsTables2a2d2007.xls
y Indicator TH22 Contribution of Tourism to the Regional Economy
n / VAT registrations by Region Indicator TH22C Tourism VAT Registrations per 10,000 population / VAT reg
Policy Reference E6: Sustainable Tourism
AMR 2008
ation
% Change Number of Overseas Residents' Visits to the UK Region
2004-07 Region 1999 2000 2001 2002
East Yorkshire 13 18 12 18
9.1 Hull UA 61 44 32 33
-6.3 North Yorkshire 433 427 331 343
-14.3 South Yorkshire 167 165 149 167
-18.2 West Yorkshire 236 263 279 296
Total Y&H 910 917 803 857
-14.5 Total England 21506 21484 19320 20542
-16.7 Spending by Overseas Residents' Visits to the UK Region (£million)
14.3 1999 2000 2001 2002
-7.1 East Yorkshire 4 4 3 6
-50.0 Hull UA 14 18 12 17
-28.6 North Yorkshire 95 89 105 95
-25.0 South Yorkshire 63 66 47 74
-14.3 West Yorkshire 63 78 90 100
-30.8 Total Y & H 239 255 257 292
Total England 11030 11359 9922 10313
-20.3 Source: Office of National Statistics: Travel Trends 1999 - 2006
-25.0 Notes: References Table 5.12 (AMR2004) and Table 5.9 (AMR2005);
6.3 No 2007 or 2008 update available
0.0
-37.1
UK Residents Trips (millions
-12.3 1998 1999 2000 2001
0.0 Y&H 9.2 10.4 13.1 11
-23.5 England 101.9 123.3 140.4 131.9
-3.8 UK Residents Trips - Spend (£mil
-13.3 1998 1999 2000 2001
-22.7 Y&H 1691 1452
England 19890 20278
-13.7 Source: 2000-2004 Data from StarUK; 2005/06 data from www.tourism
otels and Restuarants as proxy for
Regional Economy
r 10,000 population / VAT registrations by Region
MR 2008
ents' Visits to the UK Region (000s)
2003 2004 2005 2006
25 19 22 17
57 56 65 69
352 435 414 409
179 230 239 211
324 376 392 511
937 1116 1132 1217
21126 199362 25323 27586
Region (£million)
2003 2004 2005 2006
8 6 5 4
19 11 20 42
98 117 103 132
58 61 61 90
101 143 188 183
284 338 377 451
10417 11343 12302 13793
el Trends 1999 - 2006
4) and Table 5.9 (AMR2005); Data sets may have been
e
UK Residents Trips (millions)
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
12.2 13.1 10 11.84 10.07 10.35
134.9 121.3 101.4 138.65 101.83 100.17
esidents Trips - Spend (£millions)
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
1595 1930 1584 1782 1397 1427
20787 20560 18960 22668 16212 16531
05/06 data from www.tourismtrade.org UK Travel Survey
Indicator TH23 Popularity of Visitor Attractions in the Region
Policy Reference E6: Sustainable Tourism
AMR 2008
Annual Visitor Attractions Survey - Top 10 Paid and Free Attactions in
Top 10 - Paid Name of Attraction Local Authority District
Attractions
1 Flamingo Land Theme Park and Zoo Ryedale
2 York Minster York
3 Eureka! The Museum for Children Calderdale
4 Harewood House Leeds
5 RHS Garden Harlow Carr Harrogate
6 Magna Science Adventure Centre Rotherham
7 Whitby Abbey Scarborough
8 Clifford's Tower York
9 Beningbrough Hall & Gardens (NT) Hambleton
10 Skipton Castle Craven
11 Yorkshire Air Museum York
12 Bronte Parsonage Museum Bradford
13 Scarborough Castle Scarborough
14 Nostell Priory (NT) Wakefield
15 Brodsworth Hall and Gardens Doncaster
16 Hemsworth Water Park and Playworld Wakefield
17 St Leonard's Farm Park Bradford
18 Nunnington Hall Ryedale
19 Burnby Hall Gardens and Museum Trust East Riding of Yorkshire
20 Treasurer's House (NT) York
Top 10 - Free Name of Attraction Local Authority District
Attractions
1 Xscape Castleford Wakefield
2 Sheffield Winter Gardens Sheffield
3 Rother Valley Country Park Rotherham
4 National Railway Museum YORK
5 Trans Pennine Trail Barnsley
6 Chevin Forest Park Leeds
7 Thrybergh Country Park Rotherham
8 The Priory Church of St Maryand St Cuthb Craven
9 Whitby Lifeboat Museum (RNLI) Scarborough
10 Cliffe Castle Museum Bradford
11 Beverley Minster East Riding of Yorkshire
12 Bradford Industrial Museum & Horses Bradford
13 Pontefract Museum Wakefield
14 The Craven Museum & Gallery Craven
15 Dewsbury Museum Kirklees
16 Pontefract Castle Wakefield
17 Ropewalk Contemporary Art and Craft North Lincolnshire
18 Sheffield Cathedral Sheffield
19 Wakefield Museum Wakefield
20 Red House Kirklees
Source: Visitor Attractions Survey - UK Tourism Survey - 2007
Visit Britian - Domestic Tourism Statistics
http://www.tourismtrade.org.uk/MarketIntelligenceResearch/DomesticTourismStatistics/VisitorAttractions/d
AMR 2008
ey - Top 10 Paid and Free Attactions in Yorkshire and Humber 2007
Category Visitor 2006 Visitor 2007 Estimate/ Exact % Change 07-06 Adult Child
Admission Admission
Charge Charge
Leisure/themepark 1,302,195 1,310,285 estimate 1 20 20
place of worship 895,000 815,000 estimate -9 5.5 0
museum/gallery 250,364 243,576 estimate -3 7.25 7.25
historic house 221,880 242,864 exact 9 13.15 8.15
garden 193,889 218,745 estimate 13 6 2.2
science/technology 155,210 133,715 exact -14 9.95 7.95
place of worship 114,814 125,217 exact 9 5 2.5
castle/fort 122,493 116,215 exact -5 3 1.5
historichouse 98,194 104,726 na 7 5.3 2.5
castle/fort 88,207 93,767 na 6 5.6 3
museum/gallery 77,000 80,000 estimate 4 5 3
museum/gallery 78,851 75,673 estimate -4 5.5 2
castle/fort 71,579 74,395 exact 4 4 2
other historic property 57,939 70,838 na 22 7 3.5
historichouse 63,330 64,944 exact 3 8.5 4.3
country park 60,000 60,000 estimate 0 0 1.5
Leisure/themepark 50,000 60,000 estimate 20 3.95 3.5
historichouse 51,332 58,987 na 15 6 3
museum/gallery 56,840 58,100 estimate 2 4 1.8
historichouse 58,237 54,938 na -6 5.8 2.9
Category Visitor 2006 Visitor 2007 Estimate/ Exact % Change 07-06 Admission
Charge
Leisure/themepark 3,476,000 3,742,081 na 8 Free
garden 2,000,000 2,200,000 na 10 Free
countrypark 827,474 903,502 exact 9 Free
museum/gallery 902,149 812,891 estimate -10 Free
other 700,766 700,000 na 0 Free
country park 500,000 500,000 estimate 0 Free
countrypark 350,000 300,000 estimate -14 Free
place of worship 119,340 135,870 estimate 14 Free
museum/gallery 110,000 110,000 estimate 0 Free
museum/gallery 57,250 86,847 exact 52 Free
place of worship 60,000 64,000 estimate 7 Free
museum/gallery 54,490 56,459 exact 4 Free
museum/gallery 57,421 53,137 exact -7 Free
museum/gallery 46,826 50,304 exact 7 Free
museum/gallery 33,280 37,803 exact 14 Free
castle/fort 53,024 34,536 exact -35 Free
museum/gallery 25,405 33,633 exact 32 Free
place of worship 25,000 30,000 exact 20 Free
museum/gallery 34,498 28,522 exact -17 Free
historichouse 24,953 25,100 exact 1 Free
esticTourismStatistics/VisitorAttractions/default.asp
Indicator TH24 Tourism Related Rural Diversification
Policy Reference E6: Sustainable Tourism
AMR 2008
NOT MONITORED
RSS Policy Outcomes (as listed in Indicator as Listed 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or
RSS) in RSS text REF in 2008 Response Data CD
E7 Rural Economy The region has supported Rural Economic TH25
the development of a Performance
strong and diverse rural
economy.
Safeguarding TH26 N NA NM
Distinctive Rural
Character
AMR Sub Indicator 2008 AMR Monitored Quality of In AMR or AMR
Chapter REF in 2008 Response Data CD Chapter
Reported In Reported In
% change in economic activity and TH14A N NA NM
employment rates in rural areas.
Rural Income Deprivation TH14B N NA NM
GVA from rural towns as a % of LA TH14C N NA NM
GVA and regional GVA
Percentage change in economic activit
Indicator TH25 Rural Economic Performance Indicator TH14A and employment rates in rural areas.
Policy Reference Policy Reference
E7: Rural Economy E7: Rural Economy
AMR 2008 AMR 2008
NOT MONITORED NOT MONITORED
ge change in economic activity
oyment rates in rural areas. Indicator TH14B Rural Income Deprivation Indicator TH14C
Policy Reference Policy Reference
Economy E7: Rural Economy
R 2008 AMR 2008 AMR 2008
NOT MONITORED NOT MONITORED
GVA from rural towns as a
percentage of Local Authority
GVA and regional GVA
E7: Rural Economy
AMR 2008
Indicator TH25 Safeguarding Distinctive Rural Character
Policy Reference E7: Rural Economy
AMR 2008
NOT MONITORED
