Profile of the City of Chino Hills
Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Regional Council includes 67 Districts which represent 189 cities in the SCAG region. SCAG Regional Council District 10 includes three cities: Chino, Chino Hills, and Ontario
Represented by: Hon. Glenn Duncan
This project was funded by the Southern California Association of Governments and shared with the City of Chino Hills. SCAG regularly provides local governments with services including planning data and information, technical assistance such as GIS training, and planning assistance such as analyses of visioning, infill, real estate investment, and fiscal impact.
Southern California Association of Governments May 2009
Southern California Association of Governments Regional Council Roster May 2009 Members Hon. Richard Dixon, Lake Forest, President Hon. Jon Edney, El Centro, 1st Vice-President Hon. Gary Ovitt, Immediate Past President Hon. Victor Carrillo Hon. Mike Antonovich Hon. Mark Ridley-Thomas Hon. Chris Norby Hon. Jeff Stone Hon. Linda Parks Hon. Antonio Villaraigosa (At-Large) Hon. Art Brown, Buena Park Hon. Robin Lowe, Hemet Hon. Kelly Chastain, Colton Hon. Keith Millhouse, Moorpark Hon. Greg Pettis, Cathedral City Hon. Bonnie Flickinger, Moreno Valley Hon. Ron Loveridge, Riverside Hon. Ron Roberts, Temecula Hon. Pat Gilbreath, Redlands Hon. Larry McCallon, Highland Hon. Deborah Robertson, Rialto Hon. Paul Eaton, Montclair Hon. Glenn Duncan, Chino Hon. Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake Hon. Paul Glaab, Laguna Niguel Hon. Beth Krom, Irvine Hon. Leslie Daigle, Newport Beach VACANT Hon. John Nielsen, Tustin Hon. Leroy Mills, Cypress Hon. Bob Hernandez, Anaheim Hon. Andy Quach, Westminster Hon. Sharon Quirk, Fullerton Hon. John Beauman, Brea Hon. Larry Nelson, Artesia Hon. Gene Daniels, Paramount Hon. David Gafin, Downey Representing District 13 District 1 San Bernardino County Imperial County Los Angeles County Los Angeles County Orange County Riverside County Ventura County Los Angeles City OCTA RCTC SANBAG VCTC District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 District 10 District 11 District 12 District 14 District 15 District 16 District 17 District 18 District 19 District 20 District 21 District 22 District 23 District 24 District 25
MAY 2009 - REGIONAL COUNCIL ROSTER – PAGE 2
Hon. Barbara Calhoun, Compton Hon. Frank Gurule, Cudahy Hon. Judy Dunlap, Inglewood Hon. Val Lerch, Long Beach Hon. Tonia Reyes-Uranga, Long Beach Hon. Stan Carroll, La Habra Heights Hon. Margaret Clark, Rosemead Hon. Keith Hanks, Azusa Hon. Barbara Messina, Alhambra Hon. Robert Harbicht, Arcadia Hon. Mike Ten, South Pasadena Hon. Carol Herrera, Diamond Bar Hon. Paula Lantz, Pomona Hon. Susan Rhilinger, Torrance Hon. Judy Mitchell, Rolling Hills Estates Hon. Pam O’Connor, Santa Monica Hon. Frank Quintero, Glendale VACANT Hon. Dennis Washburn, Calabasas Hon. Bryan MacDonald, Oxnard Hon. Glen Becerra, Simi Valley Hon. Carl Morehouse, San Buenaventura Hon. Ed Reyes, Los Angeles Hon. Wendy Greuel, Los Angeles Hon. Dennis Zine, Los Angeles Hon. Tom LaBonge, Los Angeles Hon. Jack Weiss, Los Angeles Hon. Tony Cardenas, Los Angeles Hon. Richard Alarcon, Los Angeles Hon. Bernard Parks, Los Angeles Hon. Jan Perry, Los Angeles Hon. Herb Wesson, Los Angeles Hon. Bill Rosendahl, Los Angeles Hon. Greig Smith, Los Angeles Hon. Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles Hon. Jose Huizar, Jr., Los Angeles Hon. Janice Hahn, Los Angeles Hon. Thomas Buckley, Lake Elsinore Hon. Gil Coerper, Huntington Beach Hon. Ginger Coleman, Apple Valley Hon. Melanie Fesmire, Indio Hon. Nury Martinez, San Fernando Hon. Mark Calac, Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
District 26 District 27 District 28 District 29 District 30 District 31 District 32 District 33 District 34 District 35 District 36 District 37 District 38 District 39 District 40 District 41 District 42 District 43 District 44 District 45 District 46 District 47 District 48 District 49 District 50 District 51 District 52 District 53 District 54 District 55 District 56 District 57 District 58 District 59 District 60 District 61 District 62 District 63 District 64 District 65 District 66 District 67 Tribal Govt. Rep
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................. 6 I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 1 II. POPULATION ........................................................................................ 2 III. HOUSEHOLDS ...................................................................................... 7 IV. HOUSING ............................................................................................. 9 V. EMPLOYMENT ...................................................................................... 11 VI. RETAIL SALES .................................................................................... 16 VII. EDUCATION ...................................................................................... 17 VIII. REFERENCES ................................................................................... 19 THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT HAS BEEN FINANCED IN PART THROUGH GRANTS FROM THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNDER THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROGRAM, SECTION 104(F) OF TITLE 23, U.S. CODE. THE CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OFFICIAL VIEWS OR POLICY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE WAS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.X. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................. 21 X. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................... 22 NOTES: .................................................................................................... 23
I. Introduction
The purpose of this report is to offer the City of Chino Hills with updated information and to assist in their planning activities. Information with respect to, for example, demographic, socio-economic and housing, is obtained from a myriad of sources. In addition, data related to education is also included. The report focuses on the major changes in the city since 2000 in comparison with that of San Bernardino County. The information presented and interpreted in this report shows current trends, and may be utilized by the City as part of the basis for making its future policies.
STATISTICAL DATA
Category Chino Hills San Bernardino County 2,055,766 30.3 36.90% 5.70% 8.70% 0.50% 2.20% 46.00% 606,005 685,642 65.20% 3.3 58,073 225,000 700,603 Chino Hills relative to San Bernardino County 3.80% 2.5 3.40% 19.10% 2.60% 2.10% 5.80% 2.50% 3.70% 3.30% 4.90% 0.2 45,578 239,000 1.30% SCAG Region
Population (2008) Median Age (Yrs) White (Non-Hispanic) Asian (Non-Hispanic) Black (Non-Hispanic) American Indian All Other Non-Hispanic Hispanic Number of Households (2008) Number of Housing Units (2008) Home Ownership Rate Average Household Size (2008) Median Family Income ($) (2007) Median Existing Home Price (2008) ($) Number of Jobs (2008)
78,957 32.8 32.90% 28.30% 5.80% 0.30% 3.30% 29.40% 22,538 22,960 85.40% 3.5 103,651 464,000 8,769
18,636,934 33.5 35.30% 11.30% 6.80% 0.30% 2.30% 43.90% 5,849,833 6,224,661 54.70% 3.1 61,901 382,300 7,845,378
Source: Claritas, Inc. 2007, California Department of Finance, Data Quick Information Systems, SCAG.
Southern California Association of Governments 1
II. Population
Population Growth
Population 2000 - 2008
# of people 100,000 80,000
66,787 68,617 76,603 77,706 77,798 78,512 78,957
• Between 2000 and 2008, the total population of the city increased by over 12,000, reaching 78,957 in 2008. • During this 8-year period, the city’s population growth rate of 18.2 percent was lower than the San Bernardino County rate of 20.6 percent.
71,424
73,241
60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, May 2008
Annual Population Change 2000 - 2008
Percent 5.0%
4.1%
4.6%
4.0% 3.0% 2.0%
1.4% 2.7%
• Annual population growth was much higher between 2001 and 2004, ranging from 2.5 percent to 4.6 percent. • Population growth slowed significantly between 2005 and 2008.
0.9% 0.6% 0.1%
2.5%
1.0% 0.0% 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
06-07
07-08
Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, May 2008
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 2
Population by Age
Population by Age 2000 - 2012
Percent 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Age 0-4 Age 5-20 Age 21-34 Age 35-54 Age 55-64 Age 65+
2012 2007 2000
• Between 2000 and 2012, the population in Chino Hills continues to be dominated by the middle-aged working cohort (35 – 54 years old) and the school-age populations (5 to 20 years old). Together, they are projected to account for over 55 percent of the total population in 2012, decreasing from over 62 percent in 2000. • Between 2000 and 2012, the share of elder population (55 - 64 old and 65+ years old) is projected to increase from about 10 percent to about 17 percent.
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
Population by Age 2000 - 2012
# of people 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000
2012
5,000 0 Age 0-4
2007 2000
Age 5-20 Age 21-34 Age 35-54 Age 55-64 Age 65+
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
• With the exception of the youngest group (0-4 years old), population is projected to increase for all age groups from 2000 to 2012. However, the population growth is more prominent for the elderly population (5564 years old and 65+ years old), which is projected to more than double from about 6,500 in 2000 to about 13,700 in 2012.
Southern California Association of Governments 3
Population by Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino of Any Race 2000 - 2012
Percent 35% 30%
25.7% 29.4% 32.4%
25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2000 2007 2012
• From 2000 to 2007, the share of Hispanic population in the city increased modestly to 29.4 percent. Hispanic population is projected to continue to increase to 32.4 percent by 2012.
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
White (Non-Hispanic) 2000 - 2012
Percent 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2000 2007 2012
24.4% 32.9% 43.8%
• Like most cities in Southern California, the share of non-Hispanic White population declined substantially in Chino Hills from 43.8percent in 2000 to 32.9 percent in 2007 and is projected to continue to decrease to 24.4 percent by 2012.
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 4
Black (Non-Hispanic) 2000 - 2012
Percent 7%
6.1%
6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0%
5.8% 5.3%
• From 2000 to 2012, the share of non-Hispanic Black population in the city is projected to increase from 5.3 percent in 2000 to 6.1 percent in 2012.
2000
2007
2012
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
Asian (Non-Hispanic) 2000 - 2012
Percent 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2000 2007 2012
21.8% 28.3% 33.3%
• The share of the Asian population in the city increased substantially from 21.8 percent in 2000 to 28.3 percent in 2007. Asian population in the city is projected to further increase to 33.3 percent in 2012.
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
Southern California Association of Governments 5
American Indian (Non-Hispanic) 2000 - 2012
Percent 0.4%
0.30%
0.3%
0.28%
0.27%
• Between 2000 and 2012, the share of the American Indian population in Chino Hills is projected to stay stable at about 0.3 percent.
0.2%
0.1%
0.0% 2000 2007 2012
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
All Other (Non-Hispanic) 2000 - 2012
Percent 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 2000 2007 2012
3.3% 3.1% 3.5%
• During the 12-year period, the share of all other non-Hispanic population group is projected to increase slightly from 3.1 percent in 2000 to 3.5 percent in 2012.
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007 and U.S. Census Bureau: Summary File 1, 2000
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 6
III. Households
Number of Households
Number of Households 2000 - 2008
• Between 2000 and 2008, the total households in the city increased by nearly 2,500, or 12.5 percent, lower than its population growth rate of 18.2 percent.
# of households 25,000
20,039 20,393
20,872
21,144
21,880
22,070
22,147
22,433
22,538
20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, May 2008
Average Household Size
Average Household Size 2000 - 2008
Average Size 4.0
Chino Hills
3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
San Bernardino County
• In 2008, the city’s average household size was 3.5, slightly higher than the county average of 3.3.
• Between 2000 and 2008, average household size increased slightly in the city and the county, but the difference between them remained constant.
Source: California Department of Finance, E-5, May 2008
Southern California Association of Governments 7
Households by Size
Households by Household Size 2007
Percent 25% 20% 15%
10.5% 24.4% 22.7% 19.8%
• Fifty-three percent of all Chino Hills households have 3 people or fewer. • Only about 11 percent of the households are single-person households.
13.5%
10%
5.7%
• Nearly 23 percent of all households in the city have at least 5 people.
3.4%
5% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 or more
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007
Households by Income
Households by Household Income 2007
Percent 35% 30% 25% 20%
16.0% 18.6% 14.9% 29.0%
• In 2007, only 18 percent of households earned less than $50,000. • More than 48 percent of households had an annual income of more than $100,000.
15% 10% 5% 0%
Less than $15,000 $15,000$24,999 $25,000$34,999 $35,000$49,999 $50,000$74,999 $75,000$99,999 $100,000$149,999 $150,000$249,999 $250,000$499,999 More than $500,000
7.6% 3.6% 2.9% 3.9% 2.6% 1.0%
Source: Claritas, Inc., 2007
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 8
IV. Housing
Housing Production
Residential Permits Issued 2000 - 2008
# of units 800 700 600
51 1 744
500 400 300 200 100 0 2000
490 422
293 1 91 89 1 01 62
• Between 2000 and 2008, 2,903 new residential permits were issued. However, almost three quarters of these permits were permitted in the first four years between 2000 and 2003. From 2004 to 2008, the number of permits issued declined dramatically.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000-2008
Permits Issued per 1,000 Residents 2000 - 2008
# of permits 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
San Bernardino County
Chino Hills
• From 2000 to 2003, the number of permits issued per 1,000 residents was about the same between the city and the county. However, between 2004 and 2007, the city figures were much lower than the corresponding county averages. In 2008, the city and county figures were almost the same again.
Source: Construction Industry Research Board, 2000-2008 and SCAG
Southern California Association of Governments 9
Housing Values
Median Home Price 2000 - 2008
Thousands $600 $500 $400
$302 $379 $453 $550 $570 $590
• The median home sale price increased steadily and substantially from $238,000 in 2000 to $590,000 in 2007, or nearly 150 percent.
$464
$300 $200 $100 $0
$238
$262
• However, most of the increase occurred from 2000 to 2005. The median home price only increased slightly between 2005 and 2007 and declined sharply in 2008. • In 2008, the median home price in Chino Hills was $464,000, $239,000 higher than that in San Bernardino County.
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004 2005
2006
2007
2008
Source: Data Quick Information Systems, 2009
Median Home Price Appreciation Rate 2000 - 2008
Percent 30% 20%
10.1% 15.3% 25.5% 19.5% 21.4%
10% 0% -10% -20%
3.6%
3.5%
• Between 2001 and 2005, annual home price appreciation rates were all in double digits between 10 and 26 percent. • Median home price appreciation slowed to around 3.5 percent between 2005 and 2007 and posted a 21.4 percent decrease in between 2007 and 2008.
-21.4%
-30% 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
Source: Data Quick Information Systems, 2009
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 10
V. Employment
Total Jobs 2003, 2006 and 2008
# of jobs 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2003 2006 2008
7,886
9,001
8,769
• In 2008, there were a total of 8,769 jobs in Chino Hills, about 11 percent greater than the 2003 level. • Total jobs in the city included wage and salary jobs and jobs held by business owners and self-employed persons. The total job count does not include unpaid volunteers or family workers, and private household workers.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003, 2006 & 2008 and SCAG
Jobs in Manufacturing 2003, 2006 and 2008
# of jobs 250 200 150 100 50 0 2003 2006 2008
188 189 164
• Between 2003 and 2008, the number of manufacturing jobs in Chino Hills declined by 24, or 13 percent.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003, 2006 & 2008 and SCAG
Southern California Association of Governments 11
Jobs in Construction 2003, 2006 and 2008
# of jobs 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2003 2006 2008
541 487 663
• Construction jobs include those engaged in both residential and non-residential construction. • Between 2003 and 2008, construction jobs in the city decreased by 54, or about 10 percent.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003, 2006 & 2008 and SCAG
Jobs in Retail Trade 2003, 2006 and 2008
# of jobs 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 2003 2006 2008
1,378 1,655 1,595
• Between 2003 and 2008, the number of retail trade jobs in the city increased by 217, or almost 16 percent.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003, 2006 & 2008 and SCAG
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 12
Jobs in Professional and Management 2003, 2006 and 2008
# of jobs 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 2003 2006 2008
1,053 1,326 1,352
• Jobs in the professional and management sector include those employed in, for example, professional and technical services, management of companies, and administration and support. • Between 2003 and 2008, the number of professional and management jobs increased by 299, or over 28 percent.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003, 2006 & 2008 and SCAG
Southern California Association of Governments 13
Jobs by Sectors Construction 2003
Public administration 5.4% Other services 3.6% Leisure and hospitality 11.6% Transportation and warehousing and utilities 2.8% Education and health 26.5% Professional and management 13.4% Information 0.8% Finance/Insurance/ Real Estate 5.8% Agriculture 0.4% 6.9% Manufacturing Wholesale 2.4% 3.0% Retail 17.5%
• Between 2003 and 2008, there were only slight changes in the share of jobs by sector in the city. Specifically, during this period, the share of education and health jobs declined from 27 percent to 26 percent while the share of retail jobs and professional management jobs increased from 17 to 18 percent and 13 to 15 percent, respectively.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003 and SCAG
Jobs by Sectors 2008
Public administration Other services 5.0% 3.3% Construction Agriculture 5.6% 0.2% Manufacturing 1.9% Wholesale 3.4% Retail 18.2%
Leisure and hospitality 12.3%
• In 2008, the education and health sector remained the largest sector, accounting for more than one quarter of total jobs in the city. • Other large sectors included retail (18 percent), professional management (15 percent) and leisure and hospitality (12 percent).
Education and health 25.7%
Transportation and warehousing and utilities 3.4% Information 0.8% Finance/Insurance/ Real Estate Professional and5.7% management 14 5%
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2008 and SCAG
Average Salaries
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 14
Average Annual Salary per Job 2003 and 2006
Dollars $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 2003 2006
$29,144 $31,464
• Average salaries per job in the city increased from $29,144 in 2003 to $31,464 in 2006, an 8 percent increase, which was below the inflation rate of 13 percent during the same period for Southern California.
Source: California Employment Development Department, 2003 & 2006
Average Annual Salary by Sector 2006 (in thousands)
Accommodation and Food Services Administrative and Support and Waste Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Construction Educational Services Finance and Insurance Health Care and Social Assistance Information Management of companies and enterprises Manufacturing Mining Other Services (except Public Administration) Professional, Scientific, and Technical Public Administration Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Retail Trade Transportation and Warehousing Utilities Wholesale Trade
• In 2006, the sector providing the highest salary per job in Chino Hills was Management of Companies and Enterprises ($85,404). • The Manufacturing sector provided the lowest annual salary per job ($10,800).
0
20
40
60
80
100
Salary ($)
Source: California Employment Development Department, ES-202, 2006
Southern California Association of Governments 15
VI. Retail Sales
Real Retail Sales 2000 - 2007 (in 2007 $)
Millions $500 $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
$274 $308 $322 $367 $413 $432 $436 $428
• Real (inflation adjusted) retail sales increased by over 56 percent between 2000 and 2007. • Most of the increase occurred from 2000 to 2004. Real retail sales went up only slightly from 2004 to 2006 and declined slightly between 2006 and 2007.
Source: California Board of Equalization, 2000-2007
Real Retail Sales per Person 2000 - 2007 (in 2007 $)
Thousands $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Chino Hills San Bernardino County
• Between 2000 and 2007, real retail sales per person for the city were much lower than those for the county as a whole and the gap has generally been widening since 2003. • In 2007, real retail sales per person for the city was about $5,500, less than one third of the county per capita of about $10,500.
Source: California Board of Equalization, 2000-2007 and SCAG
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 16
VII. Education
K-12 Student Enrollment 2000 - 2006
# of students 20,000
15,432 15,495
15,000
13,002
13,272
13,721
14,168
14,659
• From 2000 and 2005, total K-12 public school enrollment for schools within the city increased steadily by nearly 2,500 (19 percent) to 15,495 students. There was a decline in 2006 of 836, or 5 percent.
10,000
5,000
0
Fall 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, 2000-2006
K-6 Student Enrollment 2000 - 2006
# of students 10,000 8,000
6,857 7,819 6,982 6,997 7,113 7,749 6,872
6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Fall 2000
• Total number of public elementary school enrollment in the city followed similar trend, increasing by 13 percent between 2000 and 2005 with an 11 percent decline in 2006.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, 2000-2006
Southern California Association of Governments 17
Grades 7-9 Student Enrollment 2000 - 2006
# of students 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0
Fall 2000
3,271 3,914 3,456 3,604 3,670 3,889 3,800
• With the exception of minor drops from 2004 to 2005 and 2005 to 2006, total public school enrollment for grades 79 increased steadily from 2000 through 2006, up by 16 percent.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, 2000-2006
Grades 10-12 Student Enrollment 2000 - 2006
# of students 5,000 4,000
3,385 3,120 3,699 2,874 2,834 3,857 3,987
3,000 2,000 1,000 0
• Of all K-12 public school enrollment, total enrollment for grades 10-12 increased the most, up by over 1,100, or more than 38 percent, between 2000 and 2006.
Fall 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, 2000-2006
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 18
VIII. References
California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division California State Board of Equalization Construction Industry Research Board Claritas, Inc. Data Quick Information Systems National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Census Bureau
Southern California Association of Governments 19
IX. Methodology
Explanation of City Relative to County In the table on page 1 of this report, the reference of City “Relative to County” for absolute numbers indicates the difference between the city number and the county number. For example, the Median Age of City A being 30 and the Median Age of County B being 35 would show a relative difference of 5. For data that is a percentage, the relative difference is based on the city as a percentage of the county total. Population The population for each jurisdiction was based on California Department of Finance data. These are the official state population and housing estimates. The 2000 figure was based on U.S. Census figures for April 1, 2000 while subsequent years represent the city’s population as of January 1 of each year. Graphs for population based on age and race were tabulated using Census 2000 data and Claritas, Inc. Households The number of households for each jurisdiction was based on California Department of Finance data. The 2000 figure was based on U.S. Census figures for April 1, 2000 while subsequent years represent the city’s households as of January 1 of each year. Households by size were calculated based on Claritas, Inc. data. Housing Residential permits issued were obtained using Construction Industry Research Board data, which are collected by Counties from self-reporting of individual cities. The number of permits issued is reflective of all types of residential permit activity, including, but not limited to new units, replacement units due to demolition, and additions. The median home price was calculated based on total home sales in the city, including single family units and condominiums. The median price does not reflect the entire universe of housing in the jurisdictions, only those that sold within the calendar year. The data was compiled from Data Quick Information Systems. Employment Employment data is based on the California Employment Development Department (EDD) county totals and is adjusted by SCAG. SCAG adjusts the data by adding self-employed to the EDD wage and salary county totals. Due to EDD methodology, employment data is based on the location of a company’s payroll and not necessarily the location of physical offices. City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 20
Retail Sales Retail sales data is obtained from the California Board of Equalization, which does not publish individual point-of-sale data. All data is adjusted for inflation. Education Student enrollment data is based on public schools that are physically located within city boundaries. Data is obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics. Choice of Data Sources The following factors were considered in choosing the data sources used for this report: • Available for all jurisdictions in the SCAG region • The most recognized source on the subject • Data sources are in the public domain • Data available on an annual basis The same data sources are used for all jurisdictional profiles (except where noted) to maintain overall reporting consistency. The jurisdiction is not constrained from using other data sources for their planning activities.
The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Additional assistance was provided by the California Department of Transportation.
Southern California Association of Governments 21
X. Acknowledgements
SCAG Management Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director Huasha Liu, Director, Planning Methods, Assessment & Compliance Ping Chang, Deputy Director, Planning Methods, Assessment & Compliance Rich Macias, Director, Regional & Comprehensive Planning Sylvia Patsaouras, Deputy Director, Regional & Comprehensive Planning Joann Africa, Acting Chief Counsel Debbie Dillon, Director, Administrative Services & Human Resources Wayne Moore, Chief Financial Officer Sharon Neely, Director, Legislation Brian Williams, Director, Government, Public & Regional Affairs Project Managers Ma’Ayn Johnson, Associate Regional Planner, Planning Methods, Assessment & Compliance Javier Minjares, Senior Regional Planner, Planning Methods, Assessment & Compliance Maps Ping Wang, Senior GIS Analyst Authors Christine Fernandez, Assistant Regional Planner Matt Horton, Regional Planner Mike Jones, Associate Regional Planner Ryan Kuo, Associate Regional Planner Bernard Lee, Regional Planner Rongsheng Luo, Regional Planner Specialist Javier Minjares, Senior Regional Planner Jessica Meaney, Associate Regional Planner Alan Thompson, Senior Regional Planner Kurt Walker, Regional Planner Specialist Ming Yin, Associate Regional Planner Reproduction Pat Camacho, Office Services Specialist Catherine Rachal, Office Services Specialist Assistance from the following SCAG staff members is also recognized: Joseph Carreras, Program Manager Simon Choi, Senior Regional Planner Specialist Hsi-hwa Hu, Transportation Modeler IV Jacob Lieb, Manager Frank Wen, Manager Ying Zhou, Regional Planner Specialist
City Profile Report 2009 - Chino Hills 22
Notes:
Southern California Association of Governments 23