Adam Smith
Shared by: KeithAnthonyBalbin
-
Stats
- views:
- 75
- posted:
- 7/6/2011
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 20
Document Sample


The Evolution of the
Modern Capitalist System
Adam Smith (1723-1790)
• Studied at the University of
Glosgow at the age of 14 and
spent 6 years at Oxford
University
• Appointed to the chair of logic
in 1751 at the University of
Glasgow, Scotland.
• In 1752 he transferred to the
chair of philosophy.
• On his travels to France, he
was influenced by the writings
of French Economists.
• 1776 The Theory of Moral
Sentiments and an Inquiry Into
the Nature of Causes of the
Wealth of Nations was
published.
– A vehement attack of the
mercantilist system.
The Wealth of Nations (1776)
The Scottish Enlightenment
philosophical and intellectual movement of 17th and
18th centuries, circa 1688-1789. Characterized by
promotion of rationality, and rejection of old political,
economic, and social order. Not revolutionary,
however, but reformist.
Scottish Enlightenment (1688-1789)
3 main features:
1) anti-clericist and anti-feudalist. Anti-clericist, not
atheism, but rejection of authority of church and
embracing of ‘new science’ (Ideas and Technology);
2) notion of progress, advancement, dynamic view of
history, moving forward for the Nation;
3) individual self-definition, self-realization.
• Also in Scotland, Enlightenment tied to reform of
universities and education.
PEOPLE WHO INFLUENCED HIM
• Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of
the United States.
• Francis Huthcheson, one of the founding Fathers
of the Scottish Enlightenment.
• Jean D'Alembert, was a French
mathematician, mechanician, inventor,
writer, physicist, philosopher, and music theorist.
• André Morellet, was a French Economist, diplomat
and writer.
• François Quesnay, the head of the Physiocratic
school.
Adam Smith’s Attack on Mercantilism
• He was making a political argument, NOT an
economic one.
– Part of the argument was for new economic policy, but..
– An essential part of the argument was for new social and
political arrangements.
• He argued that the basic unit for social analysis should
be the nation, not the state.
• He was against the belief that trade was a zero-sum
game
– It was a positive-sum game.
– Both nations gained.
Mercantilism- The theory and system of political economy prevailing in Europe after
the decline of feudalism, based on national policies of accumulating bullion,
establishing colonies and a merchant marine, and developing industry and mining to
attain a favorable balance of trade.
CAPITALISM
Capitalism is a free market economic system in which the means
of production are privately owned and operated for profit. In
which economic intervention and regulation by the state is limited
to tax collection, and enforcement of private ownership and
contracts. It is the opposite of a controlled market, in which the
state directly regulates how goods, services and labor may be
used, priced, or distributed.
Basic Capitalist Principles
1. Goods and services are produced for profitable
exchange.
2. Human labor power is a commodity for
sale LABOR IS THE SOURCE OF VALUE.
Goods & Service
Consumer Spending
Businesses Households
Wages
Labor & Investments
Basic Capitalist Principles
3. The “Invisible Hand” of the market
– Problem How do we survive in a world
where we must depend on many others, but
where humans are by nature self-interested
individuals??
– Solution the free market, while appearing
chaotic and unrestrained, is actually guided to
produce the right amount and variety of goods by a
so-called
“invisible hand.”
– Therefore, the basic
market mechanism is
self-regulating!
Basic Capitalist Principles
4. Individuals seeking success are driven by self-
interest Profit Motive
5. The Law of Supply and Demand
– Individuals who are free to pursue their
self-interest will produce goods and services that
others want, at prices others will be
willing to pay.
Basic Capitalist Principles
6. Law of Competition
– The competitive market system compels
producers to be increasingly efficient, and to
respond to the desires of consumers.
7. A social division of labor will maximize the
satisfaction of individual wants and needs, given
scarce resources.
8. Government should interfere minimally with the
free and efficient workings of the market
– Laissez faire *“Let’s go! Lets act for ourselves!.”+
There, there it is again—the invisible hand
of the marketplace giving us the finger.
END
On the division of labour
It is the great multiplication of the productions
of all the different arts, in consequence of the
division of labour, which occasions, in a well-
governed society, that universal opulence which
extends itself to the lowest ranks of the people.-The
Wealth Of Nations, Book I, Chapter I, p. 22,
para. 10.
On competition…
In general, if any branch of trade, or any
division of labour, be advantageous to the public,
the freer and more general the competition, it will
always be the more so.-The Wealth Of Nations,
Book II, Chapter II, p.329, para. 106.
On government…
It is the highest impertinence and presumption… in kings
and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private
people, and to restrain their expense... They are themselves
always, and without any exception, the greatest spendthrifts in
the society. Let them look well after their own expense, and
they may safely trust private people with theirs. If their own
extravagance does not ruin the state, that of their subjects
never will.-The Wealth Of Nations, Book II, Chapter
III, p.346, para. 36.
On import controls
As a rich man is likely to be a better customer to the
industrious people in his neighbourhood than a poor, so is
likewise a rich nation. [Trade restrictions,] by aiming at
the impoverishment of all our neighbours, tend to render
that very commerce insignificant and contemptible.-The
Wealth Of Nations, Book IV, Chapter III, Part II,
p.495, para. c11.
human empathy
How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are
evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him
in the fortune of others, and render their happiness
necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except
the pleasure of seeing it.-The Theory Of Moral
Sentiments, Part I, Section I, Chapter I, p. 9,
para.1.
invisible hand…
[The rich] consume little more than the poor, and in spite of
their natural selfishness and rapacity…they divide with the poor
the produce of all their improvements. They are led by an invisible
hand to make nearly the same distribution of the necessaries of
life, which would have been made, had the earth been divided into
equal portions among all its inhabitants, and thus without
intending it, without knowing it, advance the interest of the
society, and afford means to the multiplication of the species.
Get documents about "